Added: 2 years ago
From: jperryam
Views: 23,512
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (136)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I watched Bill Black and his various interviews over two years ago. I'm surprised that people are just now listening to him. He's a sharp guy and the cronies know it, they just don't like that he's not on their side.

  • 28 - 30 minutes is longer then most attention spans... regular news shows are set up to be sound bites of info, whether it's fact or spin is anyone's guess, and society has been reduced to believing they suffer from ADD.

  • Bushie is gone. Who should be arrested today?

  • @xmenrus - As I'm sure you understand, leaving the crime scene does not make the perpetrator any less responsible for the crime. The list of all the people who should be arrested is far too long to fit into a YouTube comment box that only allows 500 characters.

  • @jperryam The uncomfortable fact is that all senators and congressmen and presidents, including Reagan,and Eisenhower, and Truman (who I considered as HONEST because he left office $50.000 in debt to retire in his mothers home), all know that the couinry was robbed by the little mama's boy, F. Roosevelt,in HJR 192, they all know the country was taken into bankruptcy in 1933.United States Congressional Record, Rep. James Traficant, Jr went to jail for saying so.

    Vol. 33, page H-1303.

  • @xmenrus Now that is one of the most bat shit crazy things I've read all day.

  • @wjksea That's because you are ignorant. If you stay quiet in public people won't now you are stupid with the facts of history. Take 5 years off; study political history, economics, finance. My formal education is: Banking, economics, and history.

    Now shut up you big dummy!

  • @xmenrus Ha, so assuming you think I'll cower and acquiesce to your demand I sit down and shut up? I can imagine the technical training you received from a corporate corrupted school of business and economics and the history lesson you received from the likes of Oral Roberts U. A grand display would have you take your gold standard debate before Nouriel Roubini. His brain versus your pea brain and me placing my bet on the winner.

  • @wjksea I told you to shut up dummy. Get some larning; until lthen stay in the peanut gallery.

  • @xmenrus Quiet moron, I'm listening to Bill Black, not you, the skid mark in his shorts.

  • The BANKERS have mass murdered 1.3 MILLION noncombatant middle east people, mostly iraqi, by buying a war of aggression.

    Arrest ALL Bankers !!!

  • The banking sector is one of the most regulated in the U.S. The definition of insanity...

  • @furyofbongos I thought I had read the most bat shit crazy thing today.

  • ANd do tell me, how does Blacks thesis hold up

    if applied to Fannie and Freddie.

    Looks like the same thing to me. Yet, the American public is STILL quite about the continued losses that pile up daily at Fannie and Freddie.

  • @mgmfish Is that the Fannie Freddie big government scapegoat trick?

  • with regulation there would be no boom . no regulation was a deliberate stratergy by the brokers , ceo's & all the way past paulson & white house! they could have had regulator bodies years ago.. why dont the experts do the right thing? because thier all enjoying your money buying and selling amongst them selves. rating agents faulsifying the credability of toxic loans, increasing the borrowers debt which in the end thier mortgages & loans should have been protected and not held responsible!

  • Great Vid! This is only Tapping the Surface!

  • Regulations?? I say the regulations are not what we need, at least no the kind of regulation system. The root of problem is still the banking system where comercial and investment banks can get gigantic amount of loans from the FEDERAL RESERVE to carry out these frauds.

  • I agree to a certain extent. Certain regulations that are in place now are part of the reason our economy started to fail. However, some regulations, such as ones that protect investors, are needed. The ones that force companies to make sub-prime loans to people that can't afford them need to go away.

  • surely you must be able to see that it is necessary to regulate the banks and financial houses. Otherwise it is impossible to stop them carrying out these frauds? How else do you suggest it be done?

    The conditions that made this collapse possible were created by deregulation. That is so obvious I feel silly having to say it.

  • Get government out of the business of manipulating the economy. This manipulation creates opportunities for the unscrupulous to manipulate people in positions of responsibility.

    This manipulation caused the Great Depression. The Fed pumped cheap money in, then clamped down causing the train wreck.

    The solution then? More power to the same fools.

    They never consider the fact that the use of force is not the answer to all problems.

  • What most people dont seem to get is that the fed is not the government.

    Government is not the problem. Government is the place where legislation is enacted, but the will driving the legislation originates outside government.

    The US government was long ago usurped by capital and has been serving the will of the financial oligarchs, not the American people, ever since.

    What is needed is representative and accountable government.

  • I agree. The Fed is an unaccountable quango, not the government exactly, But unaccountable government is the reason it exists.

    I agree we need better representation. I am in favor of proportional representation according to population in one house.

    I also think we need a second house whose makeup is PR according to taxes paid. This house would only decide spending and borrowing, not general policy.

  • The Fed was foisted on the American people by a quiet coup in 1913, funded by the bankers. It is above the law. Search 'greenspan admits' on YT.

    Democracy is the ideal system for the oligarchs. Their rule is hidden behind the screen of apparent democratic representation. Politicians, whom they fund, do their bidding. The will driving national policy in America originates outside gov in the boardrooms of the elite. America is ruled by a financial elite, and almost no one notices.

  • yes, but what the US has is not democracy. A system where you can actually decide who gets to vote for you in the legislature would actually work against the power of money in politics.

    Of course, a more democratic system also can lead to populist policy without regard to cost, which is why we need spending decided in proportion to who pays the taxes.

  • The problem with American democracy is that it is dominated by money. A politician's primary constituency are those who fund their campaign, not those who vote for them.

    I cannot agree with your suggestion that the rich should have more of a say. That is actually what the problem is at the moment. US gov policy is being determined by a wealthy elite through their think tanks and lobbies etc.

    Social justice, fairness, equal access to education and universal health care etc is the way to go.

  • it is not the rich that have more say. it is the corrupt rich. Not all rich people are corrupt and those who are not do not pay off senators.

    Proportional representation according to population will interrupt this corruption.

    If you pick a party very close to your own values, its much harder for reps from very parties aligned with very specific beliefs to deviate from those when they vote.

  • And congressional elections would be much less costly in such a scenario because picking the party most aligned with your beliefs is much easier than figuring out which of the two bipolar parties is lying to you the least.

    I am not advocating that the rich determination all policy. The rich do not even pay all the taxes! And they are very diverse as well. But those who are paying the taxes have the right to say in how those dollars are spent. Currently there is no constraint at all.

  • It is really is a mess and difficult to see how it can be fixed. PR is probably better I agree.

    Capitalism as we have it today guarantees rule by a financial oligarchy. Power concentrates in few hands. Capitalism is a flawed system; and I believe it is not viable going forward.

    I tthink the oligarchs know this too and their NWO will be basedd on a different system.

  • I guess capitalism is unviable IF you think the current American system is capitalism. It is not!

    Capitalism is limited government and a free market. We don't have either. In a free market, government doesn't manipulate interest rates to create financial bubbles.

    In a free market, government does not lend money to people regardless of their ability to pay back. It doesn't lend money at all.

    No, this is not capitalism.

  • I agree that the current system is not free market capitalism.

    But I would argue that the current system is the inevitable outcome of unregulated capitalism - where economic and political power is usurped by a small elite.

    What looks like gov interference is really the elite using gov to their own advantage.

    The laws are passed in congress, but the will driving what is passed is outside in the think tanks and lobbies of the elite.

    Your politiciians are hostage to the elite.

  • That doesn't mean the decision making system cannot be reformed to interrupt these bad patterns.

    That takes an education project to be sure, but it can only begin when people believe it can be done.

  • I agree it can be changed and I hope eventually it will...I dont expect that to happen any time soon.

  • things never change until the moment that they do

  • @siddhaam Free market capitalism is when I use my money to get my way. Are you confusing business competition with capitalism? Capitalism is making money and attaining power via capital. The greatest form of capitalism is monopoly capitalism. This ultimate achievement of capitalism is profit maximization and low overhead, no service or product provided is ideal as that's part of overhead. Just keep the money coming. If the slaves can work without eating all the better.

  • @musclegrab Yes, it is capitalism when private wealth buys politicians and gets them to bid on behalf of a few over the rest. Capitalism means monetary wealth rules. Why is it that people have been so brain washed in this country as to sanctify capitalism? Where in the constitution is it written that the United States is a union of capitalism. Capitalism came before the United States in the form of the British Empire.

  • @musclegrab Which means truly get everything that money can buy including politicians and a government tailored to their special interests needs. Sorry, I don't agree with a system that gives the power to the highest bidders. That's what old Europe was all about and the wealth divide was stifling.

  • @siddhaam There is nothing wrong with the concept of democracy but I'll agree, there is a smoke screen in place and the masses have been plodding along blindly through it.

  • saying we don't need regulations is like saying human beings don't need laws..the problem is never the regulation, but how its implemented and/or enforced...if people create a regulation, and simultaenously create a loophole or back door, then you can't fault the regulation, the blame lies in the person who drafted it, especially when that is intentionally done....

  • Comment removed

  • i see no problem with that...bad businesses should be allowed to fail..but that has nothing to do with what i was talking about...

  • regulation is interfering with business arrangements people make amongst themselves. regulation is government using force to decide things rather than people deciding for themselves what they will do.

    Also, Congress makes laws, while regulations are written by entities like the FCC and these get arbitrarily changed all the time when a new president comes in. So regulations are really against the rule of law. Legal principles re not followed, but decisions of appointed officials are.

  • There is a proper role for LAW and that is the enforcement and protection of basic rights.

    Not imaginary rights such as the right to force someone else to pay for your health care, but real rights like the right to own a printing press and do whatever you please with it.

  • i appreciate where you're coming from...I view LAW as regulation.....but I guess what you're saying is when regulation contradicts law, the problems begin...I agree with that wholeheartedly...Regulation in my opinion should compliment LAW not provide loopholes for it...so my overall point was regulation in and of itself is not a bad thing if used properly...I guess the proper use has been our problem throughout the years

  • The problems begin when rights are violated. When regulation violates someone's right to their property, its wrong.

    For example, instead of deciding for itself what should be done with the airwaves, the FCC should enable ownership of the available bandwidth and ensure these are not violated and that their use does not step on other rights.

    There is no justification for regulating what people can say over these airwaves anymore than there is for printing press police.

  • so you don't think there should be any allowances and prohibitions on what can be said over public airwaves? are you telling me that it should be left up to the individual and anything goes? I can't see how you can create a moral society this way...You can't have it both ways...you can't have a moral and ethical society while letting any and everyone to do what he wants...there has to be some guidelines, some parameters...no?

  • i'm challenging the whole concept of "public" airwaves. Why should government be deciding what is transmitted through the air when it does not have the right to decide what words can come out of your mouth?

    The question is a moral society according to who? Are you against free speech if people are going to say things you think are immoral?

    People have the right to express themselves. There is no right to interfere with the expressions of others.

  • i totally understand, appreciate and vehemently disagree with you...because what you're basically saying is you want to live in a world with NO laws, and have people do whatever they please...I think if you really sat down and considered what type of world we would have with no laws, rules or regulations, you would be able to envision what type of chaotic world this would be.

  • I am all for laws that establish and protect rights

    this does not mean having no laws

    but it definitely means less dictating to others who they should live their lives.

  • don't you see the inherent problem with statements like "less dictating"...I mean like you said, who gets to decide what is too much? well I'm a firm believer, of letting Countries set up their own system, Socialist, democracy etc. and let individuals decide where and how they want to live instead of trying to get everyone to live under one system...

  • legal principles called rights can be used to determine what is too much. Its a common practice in many countries actually.

    individuals deciding how they want to live is another concept called freedom

  • Bernanke, Geithner, Rubens, Summers, Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan & the Federal Reserve Bank know exactly what they are doing by collapsing the US Dollar:

    The purpose of this financial crisis is to take down the U.S. dollar as the stable datum of planetary finance and, in the midst of the resulting confusion, put in its place a Global Monetary Authority [GMA - run directly by international bankers freed of any government control] -a planetary financial control organization" - Bruce Wiseman

  • European & American state aid is interlocked into the International Bank of Settlements, which is tied to World Bank, which is tied into the IMF, which is like all things: Tied into Goldman Sachs!

    AIG is run by Edley of Goldman Sachs!

    All roads lead to: Goldman Sachs!

    Why don't sheeple want to be independent of Goldman Sachs & JP Morgan?

    Instead their lives are dictated to by a bunch of arbitrage wielding sycophants & sociopathic criminals who profit by destroying the system!

  • Hidden from news last week:

    Americas 6th largest financial collapse: Colonial Bank!

    The FDIC is run by Sheila Bair, a Lawyer, and the dean at the Isenberg Institute. Her and her staff of Zio-clowns are not about to arrest the directors, the executive management, the auditors, or the investment oversight board.

    This clueless clown belongs behind the counter of a McDonalds. He is cooking the 'Health Scheme' where doctors, hospitals, and Hispanic immigrants get a $ trillion dollars.

  • Take money from the competent & give to incompetent?

    Daschle, Killefer, & Geithner tax-cheats!; Berney Madoff fraud; Barney Frank was arrested for running a male prostitution ring from his own house when he was supposed to have oversight of Freddie Mack; Sen Dodd for mortgage fraud; US Trade Rep Ron Kirk a tax cheat; etc

    Tax-exempt foundations are used to conceal and protect wealth from taxes, and to reward corrupt politicians who "went along."

    Is it now time American citizens break the law?

  • @musclegrab Regulations are laws and laws can be helpful and sometimes not but without laws, the criminals are the winners and good people merely take it in the shorts until they fight back and regulate.

  • @akprince213 Yeah, after I got sick on that lead tainted peanut butter, that company never got a jar of peanut butter sold to me again. Your idea of regulation isn't practical and safe enough for my liking and I think many others would agree. It's like, just take the traffic lights away, if enough small cars get creamed by SUVs the owners of them will buy SUVs next time if they survive.

  • In my opinion, what needs to be focused upon, is this. Just take the gloves off, and list the names of all of these financiers and look for a common denominator. Many of us see this lopsidedness in the financial institutions. Unfortunately, we also get labeled right away as racists, bigots, or anti-this or that just for being critical concerning a specific group of people. The majority of the Obama administration are of this "taboo" ilk.. How long must we be silenced? Why is it taboo to ask?

  • These kinds of risks only arose when the government lowered standards for the loans Fannie and Freddie had to write. It was these loans that were repackaged as AAA.

    On top of removal of all standards, the Federal Reserve dumped trillions in cheap money into the situation.

    So, while business exploited this situation, it originated with government policy.

    In any case, glad to see the Left is starting to wake up to the nature of the problem, even if they miss the true origin of it.

  • Makes sense if you believe Washington and Wall Street operate independently. But it's easy to see that what we're really dealing with here is one big "good ol' boy" network.

    There is nothing "federal" about the Federal Reserve. It's a group of private bankers that has been manipulating monetary policy since 1913. Geithner was the N.Y. Fed president before his current job. Paulson went from CEO of Goldman Sachs straight to Treasury. The list goes on.

    The policy originated on Wall Street.

  • right u r jperryam

    this nonsense has to end

  • @musclegrab the government has nothing to do with rating a credit default swap.

    moody's for example.. the govenment had nothing to with their fraud.

    quit defending this market..its not free.. and its not capitalism

  • @musclegrab I'm assuming you know little of William Black. He comes across as a liberal, lefty democrat far more than a republican. Your absolution to business exploitation says little good about your view of the role of business and the trust society can have in it if sociopathic unethical behavior is that which business doesn't have a responsibility to stand against but rather exploit to at every turn to make a profit.

  • Paranoia and irresponsible accusations. There is no evidence that the bad loans were deliberate. They don't have to be "deliberate" to be bad. This guy is trying to make a name for himself and sell books. Bunch of nonsense.

  • Are you suggesting that Black was lying when he quoted Fitch as saying there was evidence of fraud in nearly every file they examined? Just because they're called "liars loans" it doesn't mean the people seeking them are the only ones lying. Please feel free to post a response video detailing your position that it's all nonsense. Sorry, but 5 sentences with zero backup doesn't exactly make your claim credible.

  • Great video! William K. Black could not be more right.

    911insidejob08 is right, the right side of the media as well as the left have lost all integrity. There are a few exceptions like Bill Moyers and Lou Dobbs. The New World Order, the Global Elite and the Zionists own and control it all. They also have their shills on both sides of the fence. and Oh Ya 911 Was An Inside Job!!

  • Right, and another thing, I'm tired of people being in denial about things unfolding right in front of our faces. Just like tagging Verichip conspiracy, and then 3 nights ago I'm at the computer and they have Verichip (picture and all) on MSNBC's home page in a feature spun with a header "10 Technologies We Can Look Forward to in the Future."

  • Wow John, I finally got a chance to sit down and watch this, what an eye opener!

  • Impeach Obama

  • Great vid-great channel-this is a lot like what I'm blogging about; in fact, it occurs to me that today, with mainstream news attacking bloggers with increasing regularity, it can't be ignored that there's an amazing coincidence that most of the 'dissemination' of news by bloggers is to aid heavy criticism of the news, of the mainstream media, of the brainless, pretty species that has cynically been put in place to read the State's News to us. Mainstream media is protecting 'cover-up' as a tool.

  • This is why if it ever comes to be that they're able to restrict/shut down/entirely overtake alternative media we must never, ever, EVER revert back to relying on standard chatterbox sellout shills like Hannity, Limbaugh, Beck, and so on because they are dishonest and have no integrity. They have proven their allegiance to the globalists, not to this country to all you people who are impressed that people like Hannity are now suddenly posing as if he's with the people by covering the tea party

  • unfortunatly, those people are the only people that know what they are talking about

  • "unfortunatly, those people are the only people that know what they are talking about"

    this statement is completely untrue. there is a plethora of sources on the internet who have been championing the truth about this intentional Ponzi Scheme, raping the American citizens. it takes a little more effort to find this information than just plopping down on the recliner and channel surfing, but is it not important enough to posterity to put forth that effort? the truth IS out there. find it!

  • and by the way, as your name suggests. if you think 911 was an inside job, then get off this page, and why dont you join the terrorists in the middle east and bomb more places

  • The gvt wouldn't be interested in hiring me to do its dirty work, lol. I'm not interested in enslaving the world, I'll leave that to them. And of course to you too with your mindless groupthink and permission for them to expand their empire at the expense of the poor. When they're releasing bioweapons in this country while telling us Al-Qaeda did it you'll still be waving your flag like a glooming idiot.

    Besides, it was our country who bombed Iraq in March of 2003 for no reason, REMEMBER??

  • well, i know you are obviously not going to believe this either, but we actually did have a reason. it was no more retarded to you guys as obama signing a 700 billion dollar stimulous bill.

  • No - wrong again. I believe Bush signed one in October 2008.

    Most people are figuring out Bush=Obama. I still have hope one day you might also.

  • No, Bush never accomplished anything but was simply good at getting people to vote for him. Then he used the government to wreck the economy and our foreign policy.

    Obama is completely different. He never accomplished anything but was simply good at getting people to vote for him. Now he's using the government to wreck the economy and our foreign policy.

    So, totally different.

  • Right!

    Too funny. It's hard to believe after all this ppl actually haven't caught on to the facade, that ppl in the presidential cabinet are CFR/Trilateral members and merely go back to their banker/CEO positions once the republicans get thrown out of office and that they're simply replaced by new members of CFR/Trilateral when the democrats take over

    And then like a revolving door, new members of the CFR/Trilateral take over the republcn cabinet when the democrats eventually get defeated

  • This video definitely needs to be watched and the potential extent of the corruption seriously considered.

    Great commentary!

  • Tim Geitner has "I'm Lying" written all over his face all the time. I can't believe his people even allow him on TV.

  • I believe this was able to happen because of the repeal of the glass/steigal act to which geithner was part of,, and look who profited from it...many Clinton people...so it isn't just Bush.

  • false left/right paradigm, meanwhile they all go out to dinner and vacation together...

  • the moyers/black interview is one of the most impressive things i've seen on what's going on. i highly recommend it. after seeing it my thought was we need to start a citizen's impeachment of geitner. watch the video!

  • I hope people watching this on TV are hearing what is being said.

  • And Geither's father and Obama's mother worked closely together in banking projects in Indonesia for the Ford Foundation. There are no coincidences with these people.

  • hi

    why this information made it to TV? because it is being traced to bush's administration and can be blamed on him. the more important truth, that obama currently is doing criminal things much worse than that, is not spoken out

    that this video got on TV is actually beneficial for the guys who constructed the financial collapse

  • ok after seeing the full video i retract my statement that this video is beneficial to those individuals who constructed the financial collapse

    i cant believe this made it to TV. normally, information like this is held back with as much force as possible, meaning speakers with knowledge like mr. black's are not allowed on TV

    a lot of high ranked people will not like this at all

  • Thanks for coming back to clarify. I'd say if the high ranked people can't handle exposure of the ugly truth, they should stop creating it.

  • Thanks

  • Seems like a compromised report due to Moyers and the expected pushjob attacking Bush and stacking AIG-panic-esque buzzwords like greed CEOs and regulation.

    I blame the government for meddling and forcing loans, and then failing to act. The Democrats hold a larger share of blame.

    Every member of Congress should be drug tested once a month, and I would vote for the majority of them to be thrown out onto the street right now.

    There should have been zero bailouts.

  • Is it not obvious that Wall Street and their Beltway bedfellows (most of whom no doubt stood to gain personally from all this fraudulent activity) worked together to make it all happen? I think the first thing we need to do is stop drawing distinctions between democrats and republicans. That just makes us prey for the "divide and conquer" trap. Zero bailouts: Agreed 110%. Drug testing every member of Congress: Good idea. Let's have term limts too.

  • Comment removed

  • Honestly you need to stop trying to solely point a finger at Bush... both sides of the political aisle are equally to blame. The entire system needs to be flushed including Banks, Unions, Government political parties and especially the FED. We won't be able to fix this until we get rid of the sources that created our problems, our founding fathers were a damn smart bunch of folks we need to get back to what they were trying to achieve.

  • Not pointing the finger solely at Bush. The title of the vid should make that clear. Plenty of blame to go around for sure. But it was the non-existent regulation during the eight years of his administration (as Black points out) that allowed the problem to become far worse.

  • Take a little step back and look at those years and the legislation that both Democrats and Republicans tried to get passed to but were effectively blocked by the other party when either one was in coontrol. Our Government needs an enema and the parties need to be flushed away. Just my opinion of course but our current system is counter productive.

  • Agreed. Actually, I think "counter productive" is being too kind.

  • Great video. The man speaks the truth. END THE FED!

  • please...if anyone here believes that auto companies would lower their prices one CENT if they had slave labor building cars please thumbs down this comment...labor cost has little to do with the cost of autos...

  • please see salbuchi..very important videos...

  • i wish i could give this video 5 stars more than once..this is very important info...ofcourse we are all terrorist because we want to know the truth...

  • you re correct sir.."they pay better" its terrible..see Salbuchi's videos...he is a great complement to this information..

  • The more I see the sicker I see they are.

  • This blaming of the banks for our current situation is a little misguided. Certainly they are culpable, but it's like giving an 6 year old kid a loaded gun and getting pissed when he kills somebody. These loans would not have been possible without the artificially low interest rates available to banks at the FED discount window. The blame for this crisis should fall squarely on the shoulders of Alan Greenspan.

  • The Federal Reserve is responsible. This crisis was deliberate in order to loot the country.

  • You shpuld change your name to wise old f*rt,because you are right .call the congressional switchboard and tell them you want congress to support hr1207 audit the fed,,,202-224-3121

  • Obama wants to control the internet. You can see why. Barry is going to be exposed too, and HE KNOWS IT!

  • Open to a global currency? Who died and made Geithner GOD? The arrogance of these people who are supposed to be serving US. Wake up sheeple!

  • I agree 100% until it got to regulation.

    Regulation is important, but what really needs to happen is fraud law enforcement.

  • I completely agree and would like to add:

    Regulation can either be good or bad (positive or negative). It is regulation that can declare fraud legal.

    1 < 0 <- 1 not just 1 < 0.

  • Fraud law enforcement for sure. Totally agreed. But it's regulation that keeps fraud from happening. And I agree with insultant that regulation can be good or bad: Good for people interested in a fair, legitimate system, and bad for criminals who want to rip off the taxpayers, because it makes scams (like the one we're living through now) harder to perpetrate.

  • the rich and powerful are screwing the american people over.

  • this is a great video

  • After 9/11, the attacks, the Justice Department transfers 500 white-collar specialists in the FBI to national terrorism. Well, we can all understand that. But then, the Bush administration refused to replace the missing 500 agents. So even today, again, as you say, this crisis is 1000 times worse, perhaps, certainly 100 times worse, than the Savings and Loan crisis. There are one-fifth as many FBI agents as worked the Savings and Loan crisis.-William K Black

  • Great video! I've know this for years. The average American needs to open their eyes to the truth. Thanks for sharing.

  • The30 minute version tells about the repeal of the Glass Stegal Act of 1933 by the Clinton Adminstration. Just one Rockefeller CFR controlled US Government Puppet after another following his Zionist NWO orders. Rothschild's RIIA and the international bankers of the Federal Reserve were also involved it pushing through this legislation. Clinton and his Cabinet should be the first ones to meet their maker Lucifer at the GALLOWS. Hell let's face it; the last 3 adminstrations must answer for this.

  • lets get this msg to the rest of the world, to whom it affects

  • thanks jp I will check out the full version. yes the collapse was fully orchestrated going many years back

  • J.P.

    Hi from Chile buddy. We gonna make a big party when we defiet this NWO fkrs. You will be my special guest. Caipiriña palm trees and chicks will be for weeks. in the mean time keep up the good work bro.

    Peace

  • Black also says that the current administration is denying the gravity and the responsibility of this banking sham because they are terrified that the WHOLE SYSTEM WILL COLLAPSE. This reminds me of cancer patients who deny the presence of a palpable lump in their breasts, because they are afraid they have cancer and hope it will go away, finally to find themselves on a death bed. Denial is a primaive response which increases the probability that the thing feared will arrive. FACE THE TRUTH.

  • Black says that the entire US banking system is a Ponzi scheme i.e. A FRAUD that is based on deceit and programed criminal betrayal of trust. Think what this means about America. I can't stress enough to read Dante's Divine Comedy: The Inferno, Last Circle of Hell, Canto XXIII etc. "The traitors of their own people".

    If you know that the US economic system is based on FRAUD and you still continue to live and work there, something is wrong with your discernment capacity. GET OUT OF THE USA

  • hey JP,

    this ain't just from bush jr. this goes back several administrations. sad thing is that there are only about 500 or so ppl. both dems and pubs who are perpetrating this. imagine campaign promises on both sides said "balance budget, government reform. etc..." both sides spout it and neither side acts to do anything but make it worse. both sides not just the left or the right. it's all a charade to keep the population distracted from what is really going on.

  • Agreed, my friend. No difference between the two parites at all. As I said in my reply to tommcreynoldscom above, I was simply reiterating a point that Black made in the interview...

  • you da man sir.

  • You left out that the change in banking law was signed by Clinton. Dont be a dull Bush basher only. We do not have 2 Parties. We have ONE. ONE with 2 factions Call it the Demopublicans or the Republicrats. These guys are working together. They want to make us think that they are fighting each other. Like Peter Schiff said. Obama is Bush on steriods. What has changed?? Still a War, BIgger Government. LOts of spending. We have been FOOLED.

  • I agree completely. It's not just about bashing Bush. I was simply reiterating the point that Mr. Black made in the interview. I'm sure if your point was made to him directly, he would agree as well and offer a clarification. Thanks...

  • Great post and thank you. I'm recording and saving the full clip.

  • thanks

  • ole Johnny boy .... be cool dude ... this is gonna start some long overdue sh*t ... uhhh ... hopefully ... throw em all out and vote in some newbies that are gonna want to do the right thing .... let em learn on the job ... anything is better than what we've had and what we now got ... we are sheep .... pretty soon some of us may actually make a noise over this stuff .... but probably not soon enough ... business as usual as long as I got mine ....

  • Thanks T -

    Right on, my friend. Throw 'em all out indeed. Two things that I think are critical and that we should focus on at the same time: REAL campaign finance reform and TERM LIMITS for Congress, just like the presidency. One group I think everybody should check out: DownsizeDC (dot org)...

    And on a personal note, the better half says "cool things" are happenin' with our little project. Can't wait to hear it!

  • 06:54

    06:54

    Folks..... find the truth ...

    06:54

    06:54

    Beware of Imposters

    06:54

    06:54

  • There is something going on with YouTube political/activist videos. They are loading very slow.  Funny that three ABBA videos that I watched from three different channels worked just fine. Thanks again John. I will post this on my facebook page.

  • Thank you!!

  • Looks to me like Obama is getting off to the same start as President George W. Bush did. Promising integrity and honesty and transparency. Then delivering the opposite. I remember Bush promising the most honest Presidency in history.

  • AND expanding on them.....

  • Excellent , as always. I saw your video on AIG as well and was wondering if you read the piece by  Matt Taibbi called "The Big Takeover"? I thought it was a good read.

  • Bloomberg reported the total cost of the bailout as 12.8 trillion dollars. 14 times the amount of currency in circulation. We are fucked.

  • Very good information!!

  • agree.... great interview. 5/5

  • A MUST SEE BY ALL.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more