A beautiful fairytale of the REAL -and- ROYAL world... when an unknown Belle in an aussie bar meets her danish Prince Charming and, years later, they become one lovely and HAPPY royal couple and parents!! DREAMS can come true!! Their being "two"gether was meant to be ... and the 'Fairy Godmother' looking over them were the OLYMPIC GAMES!! Best of luck from GREECE!!
I like the Danish Royal Family. They are very interesting Royal there is why the Danish is the happiest people on Earth. They have a very caring Royal Family and especially Crown Prince Frederick and Crown Princess Mary and their family is great.
if they have crown infront of princess/prince that means that they are blood. if they dont have that infront of princess/prince then that means that they married in.
@elinheartstristin. No I´m sorry, but in Denmark they have Crown infront of Prince and Princess if they are going to be king and queen, when the old king or queen die.
Frederiks brother is only titled prince, because he is not the first in the row to inherit the the Crown. But Crown Princess Mary was not even royal or Danish before she got married, but anyway she is going to be our queen, when our regent
Queen Margrethe dies, because she married the first in the row to the crown.
@BimborgBroadcast Are Mary going to be our regent? I thought it was Frederik who was going to be our regent? And I didnt know a foreigner could be our regent?
@Blackie3391 You are right Frederik is going to be our regent. When he becomes King, and his wife Mary is going to be Queen, but not regent queen as queen Margrethe is now.
@Blackie3391 Hey Blackie, You seems to be wellinformed about the Danish royal family. So if you don´t know about the law of The Danish succession, then I can recomand Wikipedia or simply google " Danmark" and read from there, And then come with peace and visit our beautiful country.
@Blackie3391 I thought so, but then again, why waste our time talking about the law of The Danish succession, when we both know how it works? Any way the royal family dont have any political power. they are important the same way as the little mermaid, tivoli,the Muhamed drawings, lego, Christiania and Hans Christian Andersen. They all in diferent ways contribute to Denmarks reputation arround the world.
Noble family?? Don't you know that at least two of Frederiks friends have been involved with cocaine. And don't you know that they produce alcohol, which destroys millions of families all over the world. Don't you know that Frederik is now involved with the IOC, which is just another corrupt organization. This family is a disgrace to Denmark
In fact all of us are already a mix of everything,the difference is that the royal families intermixed more often in the past 2000 years,and have the respective lineage books,while we commoners,intermixed,and we didn´t even knew about it,until the discovery of the human genome.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
luk det tåbelige kongehus med de modbydelige uspekulere lede dovne royale bistandklienter fra amalienborg der ikke gider arbejde - nasseprinsesse og nasseprins mig her og der
Længe leve Hr. Jensen, som igennem hele livet har slidt og slæbt for Danmark og for den royale familie så de kunne leve på 1. række, mens han har måttet tage til takke med en mørk 2. værelses lejlighed på Nørrbro. Tak til Hr. Jensen som finder sig i at han nu har måttet vente i 5 måneder på den hofteoperation, som egentlig burde have fundet sted for 3 måneder siden. Hr. Jensen siger tak for de få minutter hjemmehjælpen kigger forbi om ugen, mens de royale parasitter griner...
Adskillige undersøgelser har vist at kongehuset tjener deres 'løn' ind flere gange alene på de generede turistindtægter. Så du aner tydeligvis ikke hvad du taler om, hvilke formentlig ikke er atypisk for din type.
Hvor har du det postulat fra og hvad er det for undersøgelser du snakker om? Når LANGT de fleste mennesker i verden ikke engang ved at vi har et konstitutionelt monarki, så tvivler jeg stærkt på, at du har ret. Turisterne kommer ikke her til landet for at se de kongelige, men derimod de slotte, som du og jeg betaler for. Monarkiet er et udemokratisk organ og er et konservativt levn fra gammel tid. Hvor andre lande har afskaffet det forlængst, holder nogle Danskere troligt fast...
i noget som kun er et signal om at vi forskelsbehandler folk i det her land. De folk som lader sig manipulerer til at tro, at det er godt for vores økonomi er pr. definition også dem som støtter løgnen omkring religioner samt holder hånden over vores korrupte politikere.
Din argumentation røg sig vist lidt en tur der. Det er pre-gymnasie lærdom at bruge argumentet "hvis du ikke ser verden som jeg, er du blevet manipuleret og løget for'. Du er vel ikke Skizofren eller bare en anelse paranoid? Holder politiet foran dit hus hele dagen? ;)
Du er svær at tage højtidelig når du ikke engang kan dokumenterer dine påstande.
Når du ikke kan finde TV2's program, må du da være i stand til at finde nogle af de "adskillige" andre undersøgelser du snakker om?
Hvis argumentation var det lige som røg der?
Man vil aldrig være i stand til at dokumentere det lort du lukker ud og iøvrigt vil det være naivt at tro at bare fordi kongelige idiotisk "goodwill kigger forbi, så afstedkommer det profit til DK.
De populæreste attraktioner i DK er Tivoli, Christiania og Legoland. Den store økonomiske vinder ved at beholde det kapitalistiske lort er idioterne selv og salg af deres helt igennem usmagelige vin. Jeg synes du skal reviderer din opfattelse af dit synspunkt på parasitterne og overveeje om vi ikke kan bruge de penge mere fornuftigt. Det samme vil jeg gøre, hvis du kan bevise din påstand, men indtil da må du bare opfattes som en nar ;-)
Jeg håber du forstår, at jeg har svært ved at tro på dit økonomiske forsvar af at kongehuset skulle være en god forretning for Danmark, når du ikke kan bevise det. Og du har stadigvæk ikke skaffet belæg for din dumme udtalelse, som du heller ikke kan.
Når vi er i en tid, hvor fattigdommen bliver stadig større i Danmark, kritisk syge der dør som følge af alt for lange ventetider på visse operationer samt regeringens beslutning om nu, at begrænse varigheden af at modtage SU,
så har vi bestemt ikke plads til et kongehus og det er tåbeligt at forsvare et sådant i en tid, hvor vi har så alvorlige problemer i vores samfund, som nogle fjolser betegner som et velfærdssamfund.
De kongelige er ikke bedre ambassadører for landet end de fleste andre danskere er. At kalde de kongelige for gode ambassadører for Danmark vidner om at du igen bruger en cliché, som der ikke er hold i. Joachim er en rendyrket snob, hans far er alkoholiker og har endnu ikke lært
at snakke vores modersmål eller et ordentligt engelsk og har i det hele taget svært ved at indordne sig under det helt klare rollemønster, som der nu engang er blandt sådanne mennesker. Vores kommende konge er ikke i stand til at formulerer sig klart og tydeligt og har en ven, som er blevet smidt i spjældet pga kokainsalg og vores dronning er sørme også en fin ambassadør......for tobaksindustrien. Vi skal heller ikke glemme, at de tjener penge på vin, som er et giftstof og på lang sigt
er med til at ødelægge tiværelsen for mange tusinde mennesker. Jeg var lige ved at glemme at Frederik med stor sandsynlighed bliver ambassadør for IOC, som er bundkorrupt.
Set på denne baggrund har jeg meget svært ved at se at jeg tager fejl. Men der er derimod flere eksempler på, at det er dig, som tager nogle tåber i forsvar. Men du er bare endnu et eksempel på at man kan bilde folk hvad som helst ind og hvis de får det at vide tilpas mange gange,
"Kongelig idiotisk goodwill kigger forbi".. Goodwill kan ikke 'kigge forbi', det er et abstrakt ord, noget man får... En af de former får goodwill jeg taler om, er diplomatiske og forretningsmæssige fordele, jeg forventer ikke du forstå det, men det ændre ikke på at de kongelige er gode ambassadører for Danmark.
TV2's 'Dags Dato' gennemgik tallene for et par år siden, desværre har det ikke været muligt at finde programmet. En del turister kommer for at se vores fine slotte (som derigennem betaler sig selv), andre for at se livgardens vagtskifte, ved særlige lejligheder dronningen og alt det andet 'halløj' der følger med. Alt det genere en masse penge, det samme gør det at vi kan 'sende' dronningen eller en af prinserne ud på 'diplomatiske' rejser, det giver goodwill man ikke kan betale sig fra.
Unfortunately, you did not know Islam well and you saw this mad feebleminded Kkir bin Laden and his group are fighting and blowing up in the world, even Muslim countries themselves did not recognize the terrorism you have the wrong idea about Islam, we believe that the terrorist bin Laden is the decision of America to serve its objectives in the presence of some Places. Clicks on the biography of the Prophet Muhammad to know who is the Prophet of Islam
God curse you, from Espoo another monotheistic religions and Allah in this life and the afterlife Oh sons of adultery, 80% of your illegitimate children, boys incest and animals Akram Tstaf you on your dirty you to condemn the denomination you exercise your women sex with dogs and call themselves human beings you dirtiest Animals FUCK TO ALL DANISH PEOPLE
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
This is a completely uncaring cruel family. They wear fur from all kinds of tortured animals and only this week Margrethe was pictured tasting and buying Foie Gras, made from force feeding geese and ducks till their liver swells to 10 times it's normal size and causing terrible suffering. I'm ashamed of this royal family.
I think it's also cruel for humans to freeze but i find other options than wearing fur from tortured animals. Perhaps you've never heard of fake fur? Why do you support animal cruelty? TAKE A LOOK AT ANIMAL CRUELTY videos ON YOU TUBE ANd SEE EXACTLY HOW THESE FUR ANIMALS ARE PRODUCED. It's horrific. Stop turning a blind eye.
Actually humans have been killing animals for tens of thousands of years in order to get food and clothes. I do not consider killing an animal to be cruel or unnatural in any way, especially not if the killing takes place in an efficient manner. Where I live there are many mink-farms and the Minks have good lives and are killed quickly without too much pain.
Who's talking of killing??? I'm talking about animal cruelty in the months /years before they are killed. Denmark is the worlds biggest producer of mink. They are imprisoned in tiny cages and mentally tortured before being electrocuted orally and anally. You obviously know nothing about animals or the conditions they are kept in. Denmark is a particularly cruel land ,i know ,i live there.
Only people with no compassion eat /wear animals from factory farms where animals are kept in horrible unnatural conditions , imobilised, force fed, stuffed with drugs, cramped , overcrowded, stressed. At least only eat organic animals who get a slightly better life.
Instead of believing that animals have a good life as i previously said look at the videos of animal cruelty on you tube. Their is absolutely no need to either eat or wear abused animals.
Sorry, but I just don't believe in that. Sure you can find exampels of animals who have bad lives in captivity but to say that life in a cage is much, much worse than life in the wild is to humanize an animal in a way that there is no basis for. Life in the wild where an animal has to fight for it's survival is also cruel. To romantizise wildlife like that shows the alienation towards nature and death that modern man is suffering from.
I have to give up , you obviously didn't read a word i said. Anybody with the slightest regard for animals or capable of compassion would never dismiss all this cruelty. Wild animals have a good life in a tiny cage?? Your nuts. Everyone of the 30 million minks produced in Denmark(to highlight just one form of cruelty) has a terrible tortured life. You choose to ignore it and pretend. You must feel in good company when the Danish royal family are ,like you, supporters of animal cruelty.
But when animals are domesticated they are not wild animals anymore. The animals that we use in farming are not the same as the ones who live in nature - they change physically and develop different instincts, especially if you deliberately try to breed certain characteristicas as we have done with cows, pigs, dogs and other animals. You're nothing but a crazy pervert who value animals higher than humans. Go marry a donkey, I hear that's legal in some countries.
Animals Don't change their instincts. However this is beside the point. I am talking about the cruelty involved in factory farming for food and clothes especially fur. These animals are treated shockingly as though they weren't alive at all. People like you choose to ignore this and pretend it doesn't exist because you never see it. Your true uncaring character comes out when you resort to calling me a pervert for caring about animals. I doubt you care for anyone but yourself.
Animals don't change? Ever heard about the theory of evolution? All living organisms change if the environment they live in change. F.ex. the dogs we have nowadays are bred to be sometimes aggressive, sometimes nice family dogs, sometimes specialized for hunting or sniffing up drugs ect. They are quite different from their wolf ancestors - the symbiosis with man has made them different. Oh and I've seen plenty of animals, I grew up on a farm.
Yes dogs can be domesticated. Minks , racoons , silver fox etc can't be. ALL this is irrelevant to the cruelty i'm talking about. NO animal deserves to be abused in tiny cages, immobilised , force fed, drugged, electrocuted, skinned alive, boiled alive and much more. I wrote virtually the same in my last comment to you, you ignored it all.
I'd bet that over time such animals can indeed be domesticated, all other animals in farming have been altered to be human ressources for food and clothes. These animals just haven't been under human control for as long as the traditional ones have.
It's not a question of betting it is a proven fact these animals can't be domesticated but you obviously don't understand , the conditions these animals are subjected to is shocking , domesticated or not , so domestication is irrelevant to the issue. No animal can be altered for human resources unless you are giving it an acceptable organic life. Anything less than organic is abuse and cruelty.
No, it's a proven fact that any animal that enters into a symbiotic relationship with another species or is subjected to a different environment than the one it's adapted to, either changes or goes extinct. Of course the question is, how long does it take for any significant change to take place? That can be very different from species to species.
Not true but assuming you are right why are minks, racoons and silver foxes after hundreds of years in captivity not domesticated then? I'M sure a zooligist could tell you the thruth.
I saw Princess Mary last year with a Swakara jacket on, this is a particularly brutal form of animal cruelty where a sheep is slaughtered some days b4 she gives birth. The lamb is then cut out of her womb alive and it is skinned for a swakara for its tightly curled undeveloped wool coat.
Well, I've been to minkfarms and I don't think there's anything excessively cruel about the way they are kept. I don't believe in unnecessary cruelty of course, but I'm not soft either. For me it's just natural to exploit nature. Peopel who live on farms have a different view of life and death than cityfolks do.
People living on the old fashioned type of farms that are few and far between today treated their animals acceptably. We are talking about factory farms where most produced today for consumption and clothes come from.They have a terrible life. I have worked with animals , owned them lived on farms and am a qualified riding instuctor so am experienced in animal affairs.
Well, what is a terrible life? Nature is cruel also. I just saw a video here on youtube where a pack of lions ate a calf alive. Then suddenly they were chased away and the halfdead calf, missing it's ears and with it's guts hanging out, stumbled back to it's herd. I felt sorry for it. At least we humans kill quickly.
Not nice for that calf obviously nature can be cruel. In a factory farm this calf would be made to stand in crate so small it can't turn or move forward, fed only milk for months before being slaughtered.
I am NOT AGAINST KILLING ANIMALS , i am against cruelty to animals. Months /years in a factory farm , no room to move, force fed/overfed, drugged and denied every chance to act on any natural instinct. Stress , boredom and a lot of pain, castration without painkillers, de beaked forced to grow so bones don't follow the tempo. Ever seen the slaughter process for chickens? It's horrific. There is a case for organic animals but factory farms never.
If you have seen and accepted the conditions of minks this is proof you have no feelings. As i said in England they have recognised the torture and fur farms are against the law.
I just have a different perspective on life. When I was a child I once saw a pig being butchered. First it was shot in the head, then my father hung it up by it's hind legs and cut it's throat with a knife, so the blood pumped down into a bucket. Then it was cut open and the guts pulled out. I didn't feel sorry for it, like I don't feel sorry for mink.
I have followed through many of my horses in the slaughter process as it was my duty to be with them at the end and know all about the process of a bolt gun and cutting the throat. These animals and pigs like your father slaughtered were the LUCKY ones. Go to a factory farm or a modern day slaughter house and see the difference.
That paragraph about humanising animals takes the biscuit !! By taking them from their own wild enviroment and caging them up one IS trying to humanise them. Their is no basis for cruelty it is easily avoidable with a little thought. Nobody needs to eat or wear animals that have been abused.You are the one alienating nature by forcing these animals out of nature. Some hunting is justifiable and closer to nature but imprisoning animals and treating them so badly is never so.
How can you say this? At the same time you have a film with the same family as a favorit. I don't get it ... do you want to insult us (even though you state that racism and intolerance is bad) or maybe you are just NOT THAT INTELLIGENT.
This has been flagged as spam show
A beautiful fairytale of the REAL -and- ROYAL world... when an unknown Belle in an aussie bar meets her danish Prince Charming and, years later, they become one lovely and HAPPY royal couple and parents!! DREAMS can come true!! Their being "two"gether was meant to be ... and the 'Fairy Godmother' looking over them were the OLYMPIC GAMES!! Best of luck from GREECE!!
MsCobaltBlue 9 months ago
Where did the audio go?
whitehat1 11 months ago
@whitehat1 Hi I don't know? It has happened before for me, and it's impossible to get in contact with the company "YouTube" about the problem.
BimborgBroadcast 11 months ago
Leve Kongehuset, Leve Frederik og Mary.
EmilTakagi 1 year ago
I like the Danish Royal Family. They are very interesting Royal there is why the Danish is the happiest people on Earth. They have a very caring Royal Family and especially Crown Prince Frederick and Crown Princess Mary and their family is great.
jadeyo91 1 year ago 3
Afskaf monakiet
SRWellington1 1 year ago
@SRWellington1 smut hjem i dit hul landsforræder
EveGallente 11 months ago
if they have crown infront of princess/prince that means that they are blood. if they dont have that infront of princess/prince then that means that they married in.
elinheartstristin 1 year ago
@elinheartstristin. No I´m sorry, but in Denmark they have Crown infront of Prince and Princess if they are going to be king and queen, when the old king or queen die.
Frederiks brother is only titled prince, because he is not the first in the row to inherit the the Crown. But Crown Princess Mary was not even royal or Danish before she got married, but anyway she is going to be our queen, when our regent
Queen Margrethe dies, because she married the first in the row to the crown.
BimborgBroadcast 1 year ago 2
@BimborgBroadcast thanks for the corrections. i knew i had something wrong:)
elinheartstristin 1 year ago
@BimborgBroadcast Are Mary going to be our regent? I thought it was Frederik who was going to be our regent? And I didnt know a foreigner could be our regent?
Blackie3391 1 year ago
@Blackie3391 You are right Frederik is going to be our regent. When he becomes King, and his wife Mary is going to be Queen, but not regent queen as queen Margrethe is now.
BimborgBroadcast 1 year ago
@BimborgBroadcast Haha sorry to say but mary is still only going to be a princess - Prince Henrik is not our king but he is Margrethe's husband.
Blackie3391 1 year ago
@Blackie3391 When Crownprince Frederik becomes king, the moment his mother dies. Then Crownprincess Mary becomes queen Mary, the same moment.
BimborgBroadcast 1 year ago
Comment removed
Blackie3391 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@BimborgBroadcast How come that Prince Henrik (HM Margrethe 2 husband) is not "King Henrik" - Hes French if I remember correct
Blackie3391 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@BimborgBroadcast How come that Prince Henrik (HM Margrethe 2 husband) is not "King Henrik" - Hes French if I remember correct
Blackie3391 1 year ago
@Blackie3391 Hey Blackie, You seems to be wellinformed about the Danish royal family. So if you don´t know about the law of The Danish succession, then I can recomand Wikipedia or simply google " Danmark" and read from there, And then come with peace and visit our beautiful country.
BimborgBroadcast 1 year ago
@BimborgBroadcast Actually Im not that wellinformed about the Danish Royal Family as I should be
And I do read a lot about Denmark, especaly the history.
By the way, I dont need to visit the country - since Im Danish myself, even got the Scandinavian blonde hair and blue eyes
I love my country a lot, maybe a bit too much sometimes
Blackie3391 1 year ago
@Blackie3391 I thought so, but then again, why waste our time talking about the law of The Danish succession, when we both know how it works? Any way the royal family dont have any political power. they are important the same way as the little mermaid, tivoli,the Muhamed drawings, lego, Christiania and Hans Christian Andersen. They all in diferent ways contribute to Denmarks reputation arround the world.
BimborgBroadcast 1 year ago
@BimborgBroadcast Of course they are important, its them who represent Denmark and their family have ruled Denmark ever since the viking ages
And all of those things you say are only a fracture of what Denmark has to offer.
Blackie3391 1 year ago
cause the danish prince is together with mary who is from austailia.
smik2630 1 year ago
o,O
No3rby 1 year ago
Afskaf monarkiet
sortkapel 1 year ago
why is there australian flag at the begining?
knight7fox2 2 years ago
The Prince's wife (Princess Mary) is an Australian citizen ;)
GTA188199 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It is just too bad that this noble family has had its blood watered down by this Aussie
Renaissanceman86 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Noble family?? Don't you know that at least two of Frederiks friends have been involved with cocaine. And don't you know that they produce alcohol, which destroys millions of families all over the world. Don't you know that Frederik is now involved with the IOC, which is just another corrupt organization. This family is a disgrace to Denmark
VikingInvaders 2 years ago
In fact all of us are already a mix of everything,the difference is that the royal families intermixed more often in the past 2000 years,and have the respective lineage books,while we commoners,intermixed,and we didn´t even knew about it,until the discovery of the human genome.
ViriathusVingathor 2 years ago
Its too bad the that the original rulers of western europe had their Noble family waterdown by the caucus man from eastern europe...
GOOGLE
--WILD MEN AND MOORS--
SUPERIORcarbonL1L2L3 2 years ago
@Renaissanceman86: Well they were pretty much a mix of everything already. Hardly any danish blood left in them so a bit of Aussie won't hurt
DALLASot 2 years ago
royals have blue blood?
can anyone tell me what is blue blood??
those monarchic countries can not say that everyone is born equal
some are born to pay taxes, some are born to live on taxes
astridbelge 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
luk det tåbelige kongehus med de modbydelige uspekulere lede dovne royale bistandklienter fra amalienborg der ikke gider arbejde - nasseprinsesse og nasseprins mig her og der
crawdi 2 years ago
Hvorfor fanden skal man stemme mod monarkiet? Jeg synes, at det er en dejlig tradition!
AJ5OG 2 years ago 31
Helt enig! En republik är som ett land utan själ...!
SuperMadameX 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Stem blankt til tronfølgeloven d. 7. juni hvis du er imod monarkiet.
Zakopane20004 2 years ago
THIS COUPLE IS A DREAM!
Tiana3009 2 years ago 16
The more important Prince and Princess of World.
PTphones 2 years ago
Crownprince and Crownprincess, please!
winner4real4life 2 years ago
cool music...
rasmusx15 3 years ago
LÆNGE LEVE KONGEHUSET!!!
kraemer878 3 years ago
Længe leve Hr. Jensen, som igennem hele livet har slidt og slæbt for Danmark og for den royale familie så de kunne leve på 1. række, mens han har måttet tage til takke med en mørk 2. værelses lejlighed på Nørrbro. Tak til Hr. Jensen som finder sig i at han nu har måttet vente i 5 måneder på den hofteoperation, som egentlig burde have fundet sted for 3 måneder siden. Hr. Jensen siger tak for de få minutter hjemmehjælpen kigger forbi om ugen, mens de royale parasitter griner...
VikingInvaders 3 years ago
hele vejen hen til banken
SKÅL DANMARK
VikingInvaders 3 years ago
Adskillige undersøgelser har vist at kongehuset tjener deres 'løn' ind flere gange alene på de generede turistindtægter. Så du aner tydeligvis ikke hvad du taler om, hvilke formentlig ikke er atypisk for din type.
Balder699 2 years ago
Hvor har du det postulat fra og hvad er det for undersøgelser du snakker om? Når LANGT de fleste mennesker i verden ikke engang ved at vi har et konstitutionelt monarki, så tvivler jeg stærkt på, at du har ret. Turisterne kommer ikke her til landet for at se de kongelige, men derimod de slotte, som du og jeg betaler for. Monarkiet er et udemokratisk organ og er et konservativt levn fra gammel tid. Hvor andre lande har afskaffet det forlængst, holder nogle Danskere troligt fast...
VikingInvaders 2 years ago
i noget som kun er et signal om at vi forskelsbehandler folk i det her land. De folk som lader sig manipulerer til at tro, at det er godt for vores økonomi er pr. definition også dem som støtter løgnen omkring religioner samt holder hånden over vores korrupte politikere.
VikingInvaders 2 years ago
Din argumentation røg sig vist lidt en tur der. Det er pre-gymnasie lærdom at bruge argumentet "hvis du ikke ser verden som jeg, er du blevet manipuleret og løget for'. Du er vel ikke Skizofren eller bare en anelse paranoid? Holder politiet foran dit hus hele dagen? ;)
Balder699 2 years ago
Du er svær at tage højtidelig når du ikke engang kan dokumenterer dine påstande.
Når du ikke kan finde TV2's program, må du da være i stand til at finde nogle af de "adskillige" andre undersøgelser du snakker om?
Hvis argumentation var det lige som røg der?
Man vil aldrig være i stand til at dokumentere det lort du lukker ud og iøvrigt vil det være naivt at tro at bare fordi kongelige idiotisk "goodwill kigger forbi, så afstedkommer det profit til DK.
VikingInvaders 2 years ago
De populæreste attraktioner i DK er Tivoli, Christiania og Legoland. Den store økonomiske vinder ved at beholde det kapitalistiske lort er idioterne selv og salg af deres helt igennem usmagelige vin. Jeg synes du skal reviderer din opfattelse af dit synspunkt på parasitterne og overveeje om vi ikke kan bruge de penge mere fornuftigt. Det samme vil jeg gøre, hvis du kan bevise din påstand, men indtil da må du bare opfattes som en nar ;-)
VikingInvaders 2 years ago
Det er muligt du opfatter mig som en 'nar', men det ændre ikke på det faktum at du tager fejl.
Balder699 2 years ago
Jeg håber du forstår, at jeg har svært ved at tro på dit økonomiske forsvar af at kongehuset skulle være en god forretning for Danmark, når du ikke kan bevise det. Og du har stadigvæk ikke skaffet belæg for din dumme udtalelse, som du heller ikke kan.
Når vi er i en tid, hvor fattigdommen bliver stadig større i Danmark, kritisk syge der dør som følge af alt for lange ventetider på visse operationer samt regeringens beslutning om nu, at begrænse varigheden af at modtage SU,
VikingInvaders 2 years ago
så har vi bestemt ikke plads til et kongehus og det er tåbeligt at forsvare et sådant i en tid, hvor vi har så alvorlige problemer i vores samfund, som nogle fjolser betegner som et velfærdssamfund.
De kongelige er ikke bedre ambassadører for landet end de fleste andre danskere er. At kalde de kongelige for gode ambassadører for Danmark vidner om at du igen bruger en cliché, som der ikke er hold i. Joachim er en rendyrket snob, hans far er alkoholiker og har endnu ikke lært
VikingInvaders 2 years ago
at snakke vores modersmål eller et ordentligt engelsk og har i det hele taget svært ved at indordne sig under det helt klare rollemønster, som der nu engang er blandt sådanne mennesker. Vores kommende konge er ikke i stand til at formulerer sig klart og tydeligt og har en ven, som er blevet smidt i spjældet pga kokainsalg og vores dronning er sørme også en fin ambassadør......for tobaksindustrien. Vi skal heller ikke glemme, at de tjener penge på vin, som er et giftstof og på lang sigt
VikingInvaders 2 years ago
er med til at ødelægge tiværelsen for mange tusinde mennesker. Jeg var lige ved at glemme at Frederik med stor sandsynlighed bliver ambassadør for IOC, som er bundkorrupt.
Set på denne baggrund har jeg meget svært ved at se at jeg tager fejl. Men der er derimod flere eksempler på, at det er dig, som tager nogle tåber i forsvar. Men du er bare endnu et eksempel på at man kan bilde folk hvad som helst ind og hvis de får det at vide tilpas mange gange,
VikingInvaders 2 years ago
så begynder de sgu til sidst, at tro på det
@Balder669, vågn op og se verden som den er.
VikingInvaders 2 years ago
"Kongelig idiotisk goodwill kigger forbi".. Goodwill kan ikke 'kigge forbi', det er et abstrakt ord, noget man får... En af de former får goodwill jeg taler om, er diplomatiske og forretningsmæssige fordele, jeg forventer ikke du forstå det, men det ændre ikke på at de kongelige er gode ambassadører for Danmark.
Balder699 2 years ago
TV2's 'Dags Dato' gennemgik tallene for et par år siden, desværre har det ikke været muligt at finde programmet. En del turister kommer for at se vores fine slotte (som derigennem betaler sig selv), andre for at se livgardens vagtskifte, ved særlige lejligheder dronningen og alt det andet 'halløj' der følger med. Alt det genere en masse penge, det samme gør det at vi kan 'sende' dronningen eller en af prinserne ud på 'diplomatiske' rejser, det giver goodwill man ikke kan betale sig fra.
Balder699 2 years ago
My dear "brother" Frederik! I come from the danish noble-family: Gagge.
Greetings from Sweden!
Ulf Sawert
Caecarulf 3 years ago
why the australian flags?
adlerzwei 3 years ago
She is Australian.
oversove 3 years ago
Because Mary Donald is from Australian.
IrisKarls 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Unfortunately, you did not know Islam well and you saw this mad feebleminded Kkir bin Laden and his group are fighting and blowing up in the world, even Muslim countries themselves did not recognize the terrorism you have the wrong idea about Islam, we believe that the terrorist bin Laden is the decision of America to serve its objectives in the presence of some Places. Clicks on the biography of the Prophet Muhammad to know who is the Prophet of Islam
alshammery508 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
God curse you, from Espoo another monotheistic religions and Allah in this life and the afterlife Oh sons of adultery, 80% of your illegitimate children, boys incest and animals Akram Tstaf you on your dirty you to condemn the denomination you exercise your women sex with dogs and call themselves human beings you dirtiest Animals FUCK TO ALL DANISH PEOPLE
alshammery508 3 years ago
Now that´s what you call an idiot!
idriveayugo 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
By God to this country despicable and morally decadent people and caused other religions
alshammery508 3 years ago
well that's was shitty formulated :P
but fuck islam anyway :D
reamyglad 3 years ago 5
hey you are a sand-monkey man. Im sorry you people missed the human evolution.
IvarTheBoneIess 3 years ago
love the music :D
IvarTheBoneIess 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
haha jævla danske maur som vifter på det stygge flagget sitt.
OsloWestSide 3 years ago
og i norge stikker man det norske flaget sit op i røven din.
IvarTheBoneIess 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
feed the poor with your tax paying money, not pomp
melindajlaidlaw 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Danish Royal Family Are Cows.
Who comes first the cow or the Dane?
zazaan 3 years ago
Mary looks so beautiful and graceful. But I think all that waving must have made her tired!
JaneAustenRules 4 years ago 3
The danish and Australian flag look really good together!!
Racerwheelchairgirl 4 years ago 4
Have you considered growing a brain ?....
woofdk 4 years ago
Bless Denmark & long live the queen !!! <3 <3
elvoord 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This is a completely uncaring cruel family. They wear fur from all kinds of tortured animals and only this week Margrethe was pictured tasting and buying Foie Gras, made from force feeding geese and ducks till their liver swells to 10 times it's normal size and causing terrible suffering. I'm ashamed of this royal family.
jonwp 4 years ago
Maybe you should care a bit more about humans...
erikfofo 4 years ago
I DO care about humans BUT I DON'T AGREE WITH HUMANS SUPPORTING ANIMAL CRUELTY.
jonwp 4 years ago
I think it's cruel for humans to freeze, so I support the right of the human race to use fur to keep itself warm :-)
erikfofo 4 years ago
I think it's also cruel for humans to freeze but i find other options than wearing fur from tortured animals. Perhaps you've never heard of fake fur? Why do you support animal cruelty? TAKE A LOOK AT ANIMAL CRUELTY videos ON YOU TUBE ANd SEE EXACTLY HOW THESE FUR ANIMALS ARE PRODUCED. It's horrific. Stop turning a blind eye.
jonwp 4 years ago
Actually humans have been killing animals for tens of thousands of years in order to get food and clothes. I do not consider killing an animal to be cruel or unnatural in any way, especially not if the killing takes place in an efficient manner. Where I live there are many mink-farms and the Minks have good lives and are killed quickly without too much pain.
erikfofo 4 years ago
Who's talking of killing??? I'm talking about animal cruelty in the months /years before they are killed. Denmark is the worlds biggest producer of mink. They are imprisoned in tiny cages and mentally tortured before being electrocuted orally and anally. You obviously know nothing about animals or the conditions they are kept in. Denmark is a particularly cruel land ,i know ,i live there.
jonwp 4 years ago
Only people with no compassion eat /wear animals from factory farms where animals are kept in horrible unnatural conditions , imobilised, force fed, stuffed with drugs, cramped , overcrowded, stressed. At least only eat organic animals who get a slightly better life.
jonwp 4 years ago
Instead of believing that animals have a good life as i previously said look at the videos of animal cruelty on you tube. Their is absolutely no need to either eat or wear abused animals.
jonwp 4 years ago
Sorry, but I just don't believe in that. Sure you can find exampels of animals who have bad lives in captivity but to say that life in a cage is much, much worse than life in the wild is to humanize an animal in a way that there is no basis for. Life in the wild where an animal has to fight for it's survival is also cruel. To romantizise wildlife like that shows the alienation towards nature and death that modern man is suffering from.
erikfofo 4 years ago
I have to give up , you obviously didn't read a word i said. Anybody with the slightest regard for animals or capable of compassion would never dismiss all this cruelty. Wild animals have a good life in a tiny cage?? Your nuts. Everyone of the 30 million minks produced in Denmark(to highlight just one form of cruelty) has a terrible tortured life. You choose to ignore it and pretend. You must feel in good company when the Danish royal family are ,like you, supporters of animal cruelty.
jonwp 4 years ago
But when animals are domesticated they are not wild animals anymore. The animals that we use in farming are not the same as the ones who live in nature - they change physically and develop different instincts, especially if you deliberately try to breed certain characteristicas as we have done with cows, pigs, dogs and other animals. You're nothing but a crazy pervert who value animals higher than humans. Go marry a donkey, I hear that's legal in some countries.
erikfofo 4 years ago
Animals Don't change their instincts. However this is beside the point. I am talking about the cruelty involved in factory farming for food and clothes especially fur. These animals are treated shockingly as though they weren't alive at all. People like you choose to ignore this and pretend it doesn't exist because you never see it. Your true uncaring character comes out when you resort to calling me a pervert for caring about animals. I doubt you care for anyone but yourself.
jonwp 4 years ago
Animals don't change? Ever heard about the theory of evolution? All living organisms change if the environment they live in change. F.ex. the dogs we have nowadays are bred to be sometimes aggressive, sometimes nice family dogs, sometimes specialized for hunting or sniffing up drugs ect. They are quite different from their wolf ancestors - the symbiosis with man has made them different. Oh and I've seen plenty of animals, I grew up on a farm.
erikfofo 4 years ago
Yes dogs can be domesticated. Minks , racoons , silver fox etc can't be. ALL this is irrelevant to the cruelty i'm talking about. NO animal deserves to be abused in tiny cages, immobilised , force fed, drugged, electrocuted, skinned alive, boiled alive and much more. I wrote virtually the same in my last comment to you, you ignored it all.
jonwp 4 years ago
I'd bet that over time such animals can indeed be domesticated, all other animals in farming have been altered to be human ressources for food and clothes. These animals just haven't been under human control for as long as the traditional ones have.
erikfofo 4 years ago
It's not a question of betting it is a proven fact these animals can't be domesticated but you obviously don't understand , the conditions these animals are subjected to is shocking , domesticated or not , so domestication is irrelevant to the issue. No animal can be altered for human resources unless you are giving it an acceptable organic life. Anything less than organic is abuse and cruelty.
jonwp 4 years ago
No, it's a proven fact that any animal that enters into a symbiotic relationship with another species or is subjected to a different environment than the one it's adapted to, either changes or goes extinct. Of course the question is, how long does it take for any significant change to take place? That can be very different from species to species.
erikfofo 4 years ago
Not true but assuming you are right why are minks, racoons and silver foxes after hundreds of years in captivity not domesticated then? I'M sure a zooligist could tell you the thruth.
jonwp 4 years ago
I saw Princess Mary last year with a Swakara jacket on, this is a particularly brutal form of animal cruelty where a sheep is slaughtered some days b4 she gives birth. The lamb is then cut out of her womb alive and it is skinned for a swakara for its tightly curled undeveloped wool coat.
jonwp 4 years ago
Well, I've been to minkfarms and I don't think there's anything excessively cruel about the way they are kept. I don't believe in unnecessary cruelty of course, but I'm not soft either. For me it's just natural to exploit nature. Peopel who live on farms have a different view of life and death than cityfolks do.
erikfofo 4 years ago
People living on the old fashioned type of farms that are few and far between today treated their animals acceptably. We are talking about factory farms where most produced today for consumption and clothes come from.They have a terrible life. I have worked with animals , owned them lived on farms and am a qualified riding instuctor so am experienced in animal affairs.
jonwp 4 years ago
Well, what is a terrible life? Nature is cruel also. I just saw a video here on youtube where a pack of lions ate a calf alive. Then suddenly they were chased away and the halfdead calf, missing it's ears and with it's guts hanging out, stumbled back to it's herd. I felt sorry for it. At least we humans kill quickly.
erikfofo 4 years ago
Not nice for that calf obviously nature can be cruel. In a factory farm this calf would be made to stand in crate so small it can't turn or move forward, fed only milk for months before being slaughtered.
jonwp 4 years ago
I am NOT AGAINST KILLING ANIMALS , i am against cruelty to animals. Months /years in a factory farm , no room to move, force fed/overfed, drugged and denied every chance to act on any natural instinct. Stress , boredom and a lot of pain, castration without painkillers, de beaked forced to grow so bones don't follow the tempo. Ever seen the slaughter process for chickens? It's horrific. There is a case for organic animals but factory farms never.
jonwp 4 years ago
If you have seen and accepted the conditions of minks this is proof you have no feelings. As i said in England they have recognised the torture and fur farms are against the law.
jonwp 4 years ago
I just have a different perspective on life. When I was a child I once saw a pig being butchered. First it was shot in the head, then my father hung it up by it's hind legs and cut it's throat with a knife, so the blood pumped down into a bucket. Then it was cut open and the guts pulled out. I didn't feel sorry for it, like I don't feel sorry for mink.
erikfofo 4 years ago
I have followed through many of my horses in the slaughter process as it was my duty to be with them at the end and know all about the process of a bolt gun and cutting the throat. These animals and pigs like your father slaughtered were the LUCKY ones. Go to a factory farm or a modern day slaughter house and see the difference.
jonwp 4 years ago
That paragraph about humanising animals takes the biscuit !! By taking them from their own wild enviroment and caging them up one IS trying to humanise them. Their is no basis for cruelty it is easily avoidable with a little thought. Nobody needs to eat or wear animals that have been abused.You are the one alienating nature by forcing these animals out of nature. Some hunting is justifiable and closer to nature but imprisoning animals and treating them so badly is never so.
jonwp 4 years ago
ALL fur farms like we have in Denmark are totally banned in England as they recognise the terrible cruelty of them.
jonwp 4 years ago
The human race has no " RIGHT" to torture animals either.
jonwp 4 years ago
bacan
davidjoseth 4 years ago
Thanks - it means something to some of us who live a long way from home. Peace.
kode1303 4 years ago
I would love to visit their country.
adelgado75 4 years ago
what a fairytale..very lucky girl
dz1987 4 years ago
DIE ROYALS DIE!!! lols.
Fitzren 4 years ago
How can you say this? At the same time you have a film with the same family as a favorit. I don't get it ... do you want to insult us (even though you state that racism and intolerance is bad) or maybe you are just NOT THAT INTELLIGENT.
Get your act together!
kode1303 4 years ago
i've mend my ways now pal. i dun talk bullshits anymore. i'm not in politics, so danes can keep their monarch for as long as they want to.
*PEACE -out
Fitzren 4 years ago
I admire the Danish Monarchy very much
GuyRoVer 4 years ago 2
How cute
Lynn15 4 years ago
like how the danish people were waving the aussie flag too....thats soooo nice
nnnooommmiii 4 years ago
such a cute couple
Spejlglat 4 years ago
I am a Tassie%2
jhappy81 5 years ago
Well congratulations on being a tassie. And thanks for giving us Mary. You have no idea how much we love her here in Denmark.
hoegsbro 4 years ago
Princess Mary has just given birth to a little Princess(17:16 Danish time)(21-04-1988)...Congratulations Mary!
RobinCherry 4 years ago
You're a "tassie"? Don't you mean you're (a) Tasmanian?
TheUnnamedGent 4 years ago