@SantaClaws488 lol, you know what, i will give you one thing: you have no fear. with all the shit talking that you do every day, someone will eventually show up at your house (well, your parents house) with a gun or a knife.
Sorry the su37 as great of a dog fighter as she is. Would just die BVR vs a f22 never seeing the f22 but for the few secs it takes 2 aim 120d too launch as it vanishes again when 72km away.
@kudryavaya1 нет, истребители всётаки лучше. хотя и машины ничего, урал вообще отличные выпускает. и дома вполне себе хороши. дороги хорогие есть, правда, только в больших городах. в сельской местности с дорогами уже проблема, что и понятно: трудно содержать дороги в самой большой стране, с самым большим их количеством, и где значительная их часть подвержена воздействию снега, тоесть разрушается быстрее чет дороги в тёплом климате.
hey look at all youtube pilots probably have never flown in a jet or any type of plane of an sort and they talk like they just flew an F22 or SU37. P.S. the Su 37 isnt in production.
You're one of those idiots who loves to quote specifications while having no clue what they mean. I bet you think the mig 31 is such an awesome airplane because it can go Mach 3. Yet you have no idea that doing so burns all the fuel in minute, it can't carry weapons, and you destroy the engine in the process.
Yah top speed is real useful. Want to keep replying and demonstrate more of your stupidity since you're on such a roll?
Yah dumb ass, for it to achieve mach 3 it can't carry weapons and it will burn all its fuel doing so. Your reading comprehension is right on par with your intellect.
@SantaClaws488 wrote:"for it to achieve mach 3 it can't carry weapons and it will burn all its fuel doing so."
You know what is funny about your statement, that only United States troops that guard its borders not armed with deadly weapons and or not aloud to use those..., and complain about illegal immigrants.
MiG-31 armed either with short, medium and long range missiles or anti radar missiles, canon, and it will do Mach 3 if situation calls for it.Its dum to think its unarmed
That's because you're dumb enough to not understand the concept of drag. Like I said, your reading comprehension is right on par with your intellect. Since you obviously missed the sarcasm, it's not a compliment.
"while carrying heavy HD cameras in a Recon variant"
So it was unarmed. Thanks again dumb ass. And it can only do mach 3 for a few minutes. That's it. Sorry you're too stupid to understand TGT and metallurgy.
I should also add that the Mig 25, from which the Mig 31 was derived from, has a combat loss record of 3 shot down for every kill the Mig 25 made. The sad part is it's one of the better scoring aircraft in the Russian arsenal. Awesome airplane indeed (by Russian standards).
@SantaClaws488 MiG25 did Mach 3.2 that was measured by Israel and US radars, while carrying heavy HD cameras in a Recon variant, and left intercepting Phantoms way behind. Did those MiG25s ran out of fuel? No, they landed under their own power. Now 25 used turbojet engines, while MiG31 using low bypass turbofans, which have greater thrust, and much better fuel economy. So your statement that it can't do M3 with a weapons or if it does it will run out of fuel in a minute is unfound
BTW, if you think the Mig 31 can sustain Mach 3 I want you to do a test for me. Put your car in neutral and hold the gas down so that your RPMs read in the red line. This will simulate your Mig 31 pushing maximum engine performance (to achieve top speed)
Do this for 30 minutes and let me know what happens.
@SantaClaws488 wrote:BTW, if you think the Mig 31 can sustain Mach 3 I want you to do a test for me. Put your car in neutral and hold the gas down so that your RPMs read in the red line. This will simulate your Mig 31 pushing maximum engine performance (to achieve top speed)
Do this for 30 minutes and let me know what happens.
-How many experiments did it take you to figure out that car in neutral won't move let alone do Mach3. What does it have to do with MiG-31 reaching Mach3?
Yah try to sound smart by mentioning tail wind when you didn't even know what it was until I mentioned it.
The only thing I see wrong with your comparison is your blatant ignorance. One the top speed of the f22 is classified. Two, I garauntee Mach 2.35 is in clean configuration. How long can it sustain that TGT? How much does range decrease? Can it do it with a weapons load and all that drag? No. Is it a useful metric? Not at all. Your ignorance is through the roof.
Read what I wrote dumbass. I said if your instruments read 120 kts and you do a 30 degree crab. Jokes aside just stop posting because practically everything you've written has been completely wrong. Ground speed is the most accurate measurement. Ground speed can be faster than what your instruments say. Pilots calculate gs ALL the time. You know NOTHING about aviation.
@SantaClaws488 dude, and another question: why do you keep insulting everyone who argues with you? you keep calling people names, spitting out hate. and especially your racial or nazist comments, like when you're calling someone dumb russian. what the fuck is wrong with you?!!! i will ask you again, is your life really is THAT boring, empty, and pathetic, that you must insult everyone just to try and make yourself feel like a bigger man?
@SantaClaws488 p.s. sure is easy to talk shit to people on the youtube. bet $10 you woudn't say that shit to someone's face. on a side note, you don't go out much, do you?
@SantaClaws488 wrote:"Jokes aside just stop posting because practically everything you've written has been completely wrong. Ground speed is the most accurate measurement. Ground speed can be faster than what your instruments say."
Su-37 capable of Mach 2.35 despite a very strong head wind, while F-22 can barely do Mach 2.25 even with a tail wind. Anything wrong with this picture? ;)
"Su-37 capable of Mach 2.35 despite a very strong head wind, while F-22 can barely do Mach 2.25 even with a tail wind"
BTW, this has to be one of the dumbest things you've written to date. It really highlights your lack of understanding. I talk about headwinds etc and you try to use it in a sentence and what you write just makes you look like an idiot.
Considering hurricane force winds are ~100 kts what "strong headwind" are you talking about? You're dumb.
@SantaClaws488 well, just looking at his post, i really don't think he was talking about hurricane type winds. now, i have no idea about f-22 or su-anything top or any other speed. but i can tell a "strong wing" from a "hurricane". "strong wind" is when you go outside, and it is really windy outside. like not a golf day at all. and "hurricane" wind, is when you go outside, and the wind tears off your ass, and tosses it into the next state. i really don't think he was talking about
@SantaClaws488 that. see, again, you're trying to make it look, like a person that you are arguing with said something, that he never did. and again, with all the insults. no one here insults you, by the way. people are trying their best to be polite. but again, you go around cursing at everyone. i will say this again: bet $10 you wouldn't say this to his face.
Considering that most winds you'll encounter are ~30 knots or less, it's pretty negligible in terms of trying to achieve mach 2 since that would be ~1400 kts. My pint is that your "strong headwind" doesn't exist unless we're talking about hurricane force winds because a 30kts headwind is nothing. Of course you're a dumb ass so you just wrote that sentence by pulling it from your ass, just like the rest of your "knowledge".
Oh btw, aircraft speed is not always greater than ground speed. If you have a tail wind your ground speed will be greater. That's why ground speed is the most accurate way to determine your speed, especially when trying to determine your eta because your instruments will always be less accurate. But please, continue to keep talking about shit you know nothing about.
Oh wow you are really dumb. I can't believe you are still posting.
One, dumbass, the pitot tube will give you a false reading if you crab into the wind. That's just one of many examples. If you are 30 degrees into the wind your instruments can say 120 kts but your true airspeed will be something else. If your instrument say 100 kts and you have a 100 kts headwind then your true airspeed will be 0. Stop posting because you are a clueless idiot.
@SantaClaws488 Lol if you crabbing for landing 30 degrees into 100 kts gusting wind your chances for crashing is is almost 100%. :)
Jokes aside, in aircraft specifications when you see speed representation in Mach number is not a ground speed by definition FYI, but aircraft actual speed that flying through the air.
@SantaClaws488 wrote:"That's just one of many examples. If you are 30 degrees into the wind your instruments can say 120 kts but your true airspeed will be something else. If your instrument say 100 kts and you have a 100 kts headwind then your true airspeed will be 0."
BTW if your power settings of the aircraft in this situation have to be set as if aircraft flying 100 kts, but if your engine set for airspeed 0 in a 100kts wind, then your aircraft crash unavoidable. ;)
..., and the whole point that I asked you SantaClaws about how aircraft measure its airspeed, is when you start to claiming that aircraft ground is the most accurate airspeed, which is not.
Point is that aircraft flight instruments don't compute true airspeed as a function of ground speed and wind speed, not to mention that aircraft actual speed is always going to be greater then aircraft ground speed. ;)
Omg lol russianretard realized what a tool he was and deleted all his posts. Go run home to mommy little boy. Spend two weeks building up your googlefu and confidence so you can cone back here and get destroyed by me again.
@SantaClaws488 ok, your stupidity outdoes your insanity at this point. who deleted his own posts? i see no "comments has been removed by the author" signs or w/e is it that youtube says when you delete your own post. i mean, the russianthunder's comment, that was between my comment an hour ago and your comment from 2 hours ago (i think it was there), is no longer there, yes, but it is because it got moved from its original spot to the "top rated comments". you know, the 2 top
@SantaClaws488 comments that any video has. ironic, that you call others stupid. by the way, why is it, that when ever you're running out of arguments, you're just starting to insult other posters? you've spitted out so many curses in the last 2 days, like, 10 times more then all the other posters combined. i mean, do you think that insulting someone else makes you right? or is your life really that empty and pathetic, that you just feel the need to insult others?
A whiz wheel is not a gps you retard. It's a modified slide rule and has been around almost as long as planes have. You really can't stop being a dumbass can you?
@SantaClaws488 wrote:"A whiz wheel is not a gps you retard. It's a modified slide rule and has been around almost as long as planes have."
Once again you confusing instrument gauge that give an airspeed of the aircraft, with navigational tool that helps estimate/guess ground airspeed, that is frankly irrelevant as a point in this particular part of the discussion, since airplane "don't fly on the ground".
Oh I guess I'm not a "real pilot" because I use what's available in the aircraft for me. So I guess the Russians aren't "real pilots" either because they use force trim, fly by wire, and radios instead of signal flash lights. I'm sure they want to be real pilots and not use any of their aids so they can be completely overwhelmed in the cockpit causing them to crash at airshows at a high rate. Oh wait...
That's because most of you are borderline retarded. Hell two people liked Russiandurrrr's post about the whiz wheel being a GPS and not existing even though its existed since the 1930's. None of them even bothered to google what a whiz wheel is. That basically tells me fanboys will be fanboys and incredibly stupid.
@SantaClaws488 wrote:"Hell two people liked Russiandurrrr's post about the whiz wheel being a GPS and not existing even though its existed since the 1930's."
--Hold on, SantaClaws, I asked you a specific question -> How actual airspeed is measured? ... and you give me a schizophrenic answer:
--GPS or "modified slide rule" called "whiz wheel".
I never called whiz wheel been a GPS or vise versa.
@SantaClaws488 dude, has it ever crossed your mind, that maybe, just maybe, when everyone around you are pointing at you and laughing, there is a tiny, small chance, that you are the one who is wrong? i mean, it seems to me, that the idea that you could be wrong, doesn't even crosses your mind for a second. you know, psychiatrists say, that crazy people never believe that they are crazy, they think that everyone around them are. you seem to have the same denial. just saying.
Like I said they used the whiz wheel. That's been around since the 30s. Keep trying to sound smart. Because it keeps making you look like a bigger dumb ass. Why are you even replying? Do you really think your gigantic knowledge gap is going to beat me when you didn't even know theres a difference with kias, tas, and ground speed? You don't even know what a whiz wheel is and think its a gps. You're such a fucking idiot.
@SantaClaws488 wrote:You don't even know what a whiz wheel is and think its a gps.
Just wonder what makes you think so? You the one who said that GPS were used to figure out ground speed. To this I can tell you that satellites was not around, when sound barrier was broken, pitot tube was used to measure aircraft airspeed, below and above supersonic speeds. ;)
Oh you can also use the whiz wheel. Oh, never knew that existed huh? Yah thought so. Like I said just stop posting and proving to me what a waste of oxygen you are.
Way to prove how utterly ignorant you are again. Unlike technology backwards russua us military aircraft have gps which gives you your ground speed. You aren't in the same league as me. You're not even planet. Stop trying to prove you know something when you've never touched a control stick when I have a 1.5 million dollar training program and real aircraft hours behind me.
@SantaClaws488 wrote:"I'm gonna educate your retarded ass again. I said ground speed is the most ACCURATE way to measure speed. Do you know what that word means?
Your pitot tube can give you readings of 120 kts but if you have a 10 kts headwind your true airspeed is 110 kts."
--Go on... Tell as how it goes figuring out from pitot tube readings to ground speed?
@alexisayev1986 ну, на основании хотя бы того, что надавали пизд.лей американцам и в корее, и во въетнаме, а ведь самолётами могль только одной рукой управлять (другой приходилось глаза к вискам оттягивать). ну и сам факт того, что он может писать по-русски, когда по русски говорит, a ne pishet vot tak, kak posledniy мудак.
@jjm34a1 i think i see what you are trying to say there. did you used the auto translator? but anyhow, the only way for us to know, which plane is better, is for usa to go to war with russia, and then we will all die an a horrible way. on the bright side, we'll be attacking syria soon, so we might see some f-22 vs russian type jets soon.
That's not right. No plane can cruise at Mach 1+ unless it has super cruise because it requires wet thrust to accomplish that. That's why the F22 is so good and can super cruise at mach 1+ and has such a tremendous advantage over gen 4 fighters.
@SantaClaws488 wrote:"That's not right. No plane can cruise at Mach 1+ unless it has super cruise because it requires wet thrust to accomplish that."
--Santa, looks like you confusing "cruise speed" with "super cruise" capability feature. F-22 super cruise speed is Mach 1.4 with Max speed at Mach 2.25, while MiG-31 for example have cruise speed of Mach 2.35 with a Max speed at Mach 3.
@SantaClaws488 wrote:"That's why the F22 is so good and can super cruise at mach 1+ and has such a tremendous advantage over gen 4 fighters. That's why the F22 is so good and can super cruise at mach 1+ and has such a tremendous advantage over gen 4 fighters."
Rafale, Eurofighter and Su-35 have a super cruise feature now, all gen 4 fighters. ;)
LOL no they don't. They say they do but they still need wet thrust. And there is no way they can super cruise with external stores. Sorry to break your heart.
For a plane to super cruise it has to be designed that way from the ground up. You can't just put engines on a plane and all of a sudden it can super cruise.
@SantaClaws488 You still confusing "cruise speed" with "super cruise", just like your friend Eag11e confused "stall" with a "stall speed". :)
Super cruise is merely supersonic flight without use of afterburner, cruise speed is the most efficient speed in terms of distance, speed and fuel usage. MiG-31 is optimized to operate at cruising speed of Mach 2.35 even though it uses afterburner.
LOL! Cruising with afterburner? LOL! You have no clue what you're talking about. You do realize that afterburners require the plane dump fuel directly into the exhaust portion near the nozzle right? Of course you don't because you have no clue what you're talking about. You can "cruise" with after burners maybe 10 minutes tops. Holy shit please stop talking.
The F22 cruises at super cruise dummy. Super cruise uses dry thrust which is why it is better.
You don't "cruise with afterburners. You do know that afterburners requires that you dump extra fuel right before the exhaust nozzle, right? Of course not, because you have no clue what you're talking about. With afterburners, you have maybe 10 minutes of fuel at most. No plane "cruises" at after burner speed.
The F22 cruises at its super cruise speed dummy. It uses dry reheat which makes it more efficient. Seriously, stop posting.
@SantaClaws488 wrote:"For a plane to super cruise it has to be designed that way from the ground up. You can't just put engines on a plane and all of a sudden it can super cruise."
--Putting an engine on plane with enough thrust to overcome drag at supersonic speeds is exactly how its done, Lyulka's Saturn engine is achieve it by enlarging a bypass fan unit.
"Putting an engine on plane with enough thrust to overcome drag at supersonic speeds is exactly how its done, Lyulka's Saturn engine is achieve it by enlarging a bypass fan unit."
Oh the retard who knows nothing about planes chimes in again. Really? So we can just put them on a C-130 and it will break the sound barrier huh? I don't think so dumb ass.
@u9040 Fighter jet maximum speed is always at high altitude with a full afterburner.
Also since the speed of sound will vary depending on the density of the air, which in terms depends on an altitude and weather conditions, ground speed is inaccurate way to use in measuring aircraft speed, so Mach number is used.
@SantaClaws488 wrote:"WHAT?!?! Ground speed is the most accurate way to determine your speed."
Ground speed, really? It would be easier to determine if planes would roll on the ground for a duration of the flight, but they don't, so "Pitot Tube" is used to determine aircraft speed in case you did not know. BTW you a first person who claimed to be a "pilot", but don't know how aircraft speed is measured.
or, maybe, just maybe, he wasn't "killing unarmed civilians who wanted a change in government", maybe, he was killing the alkaeda (you know, the one that blew up the towers on 9/11) members, who were trying to overthrow the rightful government? i mean, is there a small, tiny chance that what foxnews tells you could be, you know, lie? just like, you know, "the weapons of mass destruction" that sadam had? you know, the leader of the country that got attacked by nato, for no reason it seems.
No and your youtube channel shows you have national pride for Russia but turned out FALSE when I looked at country.... what a disgrace you are for the "motherland"
सुखोई यह रूस की एक महान कंपनी है. इस कंपनी ने दुनिया को बेहतरीन हवाई जहाज दिए है. दुनिया के कई देश इस कंपनी के मिलिटरी लड़ाकू विमान इस्तेमाल कर रहे है. भारत रूस का पारंपरिक मित्र देश है. अत्याधुनिक सुखोई भारतीय वायु सेना को सुशोभित करते है. भारत और रूस की दोस्ती इस दुनिया के अंत तक कायम बनी रहे. जय हिंद.
Красивый пилотаж! И борт необыкновенно красивый! Радует.
Огорчили американские комментаторы. Они совсем без башни что-ли? Открыто обсуждают, что 29 МИГи некачественные, а за 2-3 года Россия не успеет изготовить 37-е в достаточном количестве! В достаточном для чего??? Т.е. тупые котики уже в уведомлённом ожидании срока начала вооружённой продажи их дерьмократии России?
@sench92 Стелс Еффект? Прям Мас Еффект какой-то. Не забывай, что не в России на практике эту идею впервую применили. Американцы фактически воспользовались только идеей.
My hope is to see you drowned in your own shit mixed with your own blood..! Nation of gays and bitches.. When you stand before God to respond for crimes, what will you argue? Will you say It was Hollywoods fault? Or video games fault? Or the White House fault? You, nation of queers, bitches, murderers and drug addicts.. You will pay for each one of your crimes against mankind!
Goddamned criminals... your crimes to mankind have piled and reached the skies.. You have used all kinds of mass destruction weapons, nuclear bombs, chemical and bacteriologic weapons.. you have invaded, killed and destroyed in the name of "liberty" and "democracy"... Mexico, Cuba, Philippines, Nicaragua, Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, Iran, Panama, Grenada, Serbia, Kosovo, Libia, Lebanon..
We did not invade Mexico. They are invading us, daily. We did not invade the Philippines, we liberated them from the Japanese. We did not invade Korea, we defended the South from Chinese communist aggression. We did not invade Vietnam, see Korea. We did not invade Serbia, we kept it free. Kosovo? Really?
We never set foot in Libya, and we had a presence in Lebanon dating back to WW2.
Get your facts straight or make like a tree and STFU.
@bayushizero you're a moron, NATO orchestrated the whole invasion of Libya, and if the criminals in the us govt didn't want it to happen it would not have happened. best wake your own ass up.
@bayushizero actually, both french and english had their special forces in libya, assisting the "rebels", who, as it turns out, were alcaida. and us had "special consultants" there as well. on top of that. are you actualy proud that "all we did was "We bombed Libya (not the first time). No American or NATO troops stepped foot into Libya."" i mean, us and nato bombed a defenseless country, and that is supposed to be ok?
What are they doing there, probably defending America? What did the American instructors in Georgia, when she shot to the residents of South Ossetia? Who gives weapons to militants in Syria? After the so-called revolution in Libya is on the brink of civil slaughter. Tell me what you need there? Where you are democracy, there is blood and falling oil prices.
@josanjosan An isareli sherman tank single handedly destroyed 4 t52 tanks.In the second indo-pakistan war several fighter jets of british and russian make were downed by a few american f-86 sabers.The list goes on and on and on.The point is ,when it comes to warfare,quality(of men and equipment) matters a LOT.
all this arguing ? all Christians should unite now while the Islamists are weak. you do know what they plan to do to the kaffir right? our religion adapts with the times, Islam is stuck in 10th century desert nomad traditions and attitudes. if they get the chance they will cut off all our balls and make us harem guards
Дело нам не хватает здесь русских инженеров есть талант. Имейте в виду, после Второй мировой войны только не американская наука процветает за счет притока русских и немецких ученых. Теперь это не так ... Они умершего, старые и или в отставке. Это новое поколение тупее, чем их родители. Я читал, что на видео работы внутри которой говорится о том, как американцы уничтожили их экономики ... Так или иначе ...
Any plane with canards gets the thumbs-down from me. It just is evidence of control being an after-thought. You don't see the F-22 doing anything "spectacular" on video because its limits, still, may be secret, so-to-speak. We NEVER will see what the F-22 can do until someone decides he wants to lose some of his own aircraft.
You (and the rest of us) have no idea what the US is working on now. The Russian and Chinese aircraft are not even in production yet, much less in the field. The F117 has been in the field for over 20 years, with the F32 in the field for 10. The difference is that the United States ALREADY HAS their aircraft. Neither Russia nor China can make that claim.
@bayushizero we have crisp idea on whom the US serves now, and you might step back and think how much time it took to kill JFK who decided to print America's money and not jewish ones.
But you won't listen to me, maybe a film by Aaron Russo (an American who died shortly after) named "America: From Freedom To Fascism" and your own eyes to compare what he talks about with what you see around will help.
Did they teach you condoms at school back then? And now?
Don't bother. Even though you claimed you aren't 16, there's a video n your page with you telling us that you're 16 in the description. Why lie? Why tell me to go to your page that shows your lying?
Anyways, you're 16 and this stuff is way over your head. You really don't have the slightest understanding of what you're talking about. And honestly, I doubt the intelligence of someone who claims something (age) and then shoves me in the direction which discredits them.
now do you have a source which claims that f-22 hull is designed to counter L-band as much as X-band? Considering that L-band waves are 15-30 cm against 2.5-4 cm of x-band I do not see how f-22 could've been designed to negate effects of L-band as much as X-band.
"Considering that L-band waves are 15-30 cm against 2.5-4 cm of x-band I do not see how f-22 could've been designed to negate effects of L-band as much as X-band. "
Oh Jesus Christ. I just explained signal cancellation to you again since it was "high school stuff" and it went completely over your head. Holy shit I'm done with you. I can't believe people as dumb as you make it in life without crash helmets.
I never started on fighter aircraft simulations tactics. You seem to be so desperate to win this argument that you focusing attention away from technology side to f-22 fan boy side. Now f-22 is a great aircraft I'm not going to argue, but you fail to recognize potential, current and future, of L-band radars. Cos, sin, tangent? That's high school stuff man. Btw to clarify if you did go to my channel to see my age on channel, I'm not 16.
If it's so easy then you have no problem understanding that all you need to do is shift the wavelength 2/pi (via skin thickness )and you cancel it out, effectively negating L-band.
I'm not an F22 fanboy. I'm just not a dumb ass who thinks you can beat it using old technology the makers were aware of and had access to, technology the F22 was designed to counter (radar).
For all you L-band fanboys, sorry but I'm going to break your heart.
The F22 is going to see any non stealth plane before it's ever detected on L-band. The F22 will see them and is not going to be stupid enough to approach head on where he will be seen in return. He will sneak up from the side or behind with his super cruise and shove an AIM120 at mach 6 right up the Russian's ass. If the Russian is lucky his RWR will go off 2 seconds right before he becomes a fireball.
Santa, You seem to fail before you have even started! Do you know what Microwave vs radio wave is? Doesn't seem you understand what L-band is! Sorry, but your replies are very childish!
Doesn't really matter what you have to say, or how many times you repeat nonsense. We are simply exchanging ideas. Secondly, when it comes to Russian technology, you would be surprised with their new NEBO VHS AESA radars, and their new emitter locators. You seem to fail to recognize that shaping an object can be focused on a certain frequency, or several frequencies, but once waves become the same size as the shaped object, that object looses its controlled scattering ability!
Like I said, the F22 is optimized for signal cancellation in the low band frequency.
Do you honestly think you're smarter than the 100s of engineers with the PHDs in electrical, mechanical and aeronautical engineering because you read something on the internet that you don't even fully understand except to parrot what was written by someone equally as clueless as you. HAHAHA
And btw you still hadn't provided a source which can testify to your f-22 designed to counter L-band as much as X-bandwidth statement..Don't be a troll now, at least try to provide detailed explanation.
I already did. If you do not understand sin, cos and basic trigonometry I'm not going to bother teaching it to you or explain wave/signal cancellation.
Exactly! You don't belong here! You belong paying for those expensive, and already redundant platforms like the F-35, designed to suck up as much taxpayer money as possible!
Все..Кирдык вашей америке..
MyRusssss 2 hours ago
I love almost everyone on here speaks as if they have actual flight experience when in truth probably less than 1% actually do
emptywendysbag 5 hours ago
what I want to know is, if I buy one, which one of these planes will get me laid?..seriously my balls are like grapefruit
surfgodx 6 hours ago
@SantaClawes448 asshole, that is my old account and i am 16, MiniVimpel is my older brother so shut your mouth and dont talk about shit u dont know
VimpelUnit 7 hours ago
@VimpelUnit
Actually, I know plenty. Your brother is a retard though. I wouldn't not take his advice if I were you.
SantaClaws488 5 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SantaClaws488 lol, you know what, i will give you one thing: you have no fear. with all the shit talking that you do every day, someone will eventually show up at your house (well, your parents house) with a gun or a knife.
val28l 4 hours ago
Что, пендосики, трухнули? :)
AlexDeFF 7 hours ago
Ибо нехуй!
Schneeirbis 12 hours ago
wow that looks like the J-35
kestrelblue 1 day ago
Kinda silly comparison considering that only two Su-37 have ever been build.
youdoitillwatch 1 day ago
Sorry the su37 as great of a dog fighter as she is. Would just die BVR vs a f22 never seeing the f22 but for the few secs it takes 2 aim 120d too launch as it vanishes again when 72km away.
starknight97 1 day ago
snaiper118 как и дороги дома и машины
kudryavaya1 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@kudryavaya1 нет, истребители всётаки лучше. хотя и машины ничего, урал вообще отличные выпускает. и дома вполне себе хороши. дороги хорогие есть, правда, только в больших городах. в сельской местности с дорогами уже проблема, что и понятно: трудно содержать дороги в самой большой стране, с самым большим их количеством, и где значительная их часть подвержена воздействию снега, тоесть разрушается быстрее чет дороги в тёплом климате.
val28l 1 day ago
F22 vs. Su-37? more like Mobius 1 vs. Yellow 13 :D
octane781 1 day ago
Reading YouTube comments :(
HerculesRockefellerr 1 day ago
hey look at all youtube pilots probably have never flown in a jet or any type of plane of an sort and they talk like they just flew an F22 or SU37. P.S. the Su 37 isnt in production.
BoredomKills25 1 day ago
Sou-37 the MASTER of the SKY COWARDLY AMERICANS!
YOU DO NOT KNOW THAT SUCH REAL WAR! WILL CRY GIRLS
PereyroSeba 1 day ago
@PereyroSeba SU37 master of the sky? Dont you mean air dominate fighter... oh wait no because its not even a production fighter.
BoredomKills25 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@BoredomKills25 wrote:"Dont you mean air dominate fighter..."
--It also called Su-35, supermaneuverable multirole fighter.
--oh wait no because its not even a production fighter.
--Su-35 will remain in production for a foreseeable future, and alone side with Su T-50 aka PAK-FA. ;)
RussianThunderrr 1 day ago
You're one of those idiots who loves to quote specifications while having no clue what they mean. I bet you think the mig 31 is such an awesome airplane because it can go Mach 3. Yet you have no idea that doing so burns all the fuel in minute, it can't carry weapons, and you destroy the engine in the process.
Yah top speed is real useful. Want to keep replying and demonstrate more of your stupidity since you're on such a roll?
SantaClaws488 1 day ago
@SantaClaws488
--I bet you think the mig 31 is such an awesome airplane because it can go Mach 3.
--Yes, and do other things, for what it known.
--Yet you have no idea that doing so burns all the fuel in minute,
--You are loonie if you think that it is physically possible for MiG-31 to burn all its(assuming full tank) fuel on a perfectly working plane.
--it can't carry weapons
--Really? ...only Santa would think this way :)
RussianThunderrr 1 day ago
@RussianThunderrr
Yah dumb ass, for it to achieve mach 3 it can't carry weapons and it will burn all its fuel doing so. Your reading comprehension is right on par with your intellect.
SantaClaws488 1 day ago
@SantaClaws488 wrote:"Your reading comprehension is right on par with your intellect."
--I'm very flirted, I wish I could say the same about your reading comprehension...
RussianThunderrr 22 hours ago
@SantaClaws488 wrote:"for it to achieve mach 3 it can't carry weapons and it will burn all its fuel doing so."
You know what is funny about your statement, that only United States troops that guard its borders not armed with deadly weapons and or not aloud to use those..., and complain about illegal immigrants.
MiG-31 armed either with short, medium and long range missiles or anti radar missiles, canon, and it will do Mach 3 if situation calls for it.Its dum to think its unarmed
RussianThunderrr 22 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@RussianThunderrr
That's because you're dumb enough to not understand the concept of drag. Like I said, your reading comprehension is right on par with your intellect. Since you obviously missed the sarcasm, it's not a compliment.
"while carrying heavy HD cameras in a Recon variant"
So it was unarmed. Thanks again dumb ass. And it can only do mach 3 for a few minutes. That's it. Sorry you're too stupid to understand TGT and metallurgy.
SantaClaws488 20 hours ago
@RussianThunderrr
I should also add that the Mig 25, from which the Mig 31 was derived from, has a combat loss record of 3 shot down for every kill the Mig 25 made. The sad part is it's one of the better scoring aircraft in the Russian arsenal. Awesome airplane indeed (by Russian standards).
SantaClaws488 1 day ago
@SantaClaws488 MiG25 did Mach 3.2 that was measured by Israel and US radars, while carrying heavy HD cameras in a Recon variant, and left intercepting Phantoms way behind. Did those MiG25s ran out of fuel? No, they landed under their own power. Now 25 used turbojet engines, while MiG31 using low bypass turbofans, which have greater thrust, and much better fuel economy. So your statement that it can't do M3 with a weapons or if it does it will run out of fuel in a minute is unfound
RussianThunderrr 21 hours ago
@RussianThunderrr
BTW, if you think the Mig 31 can sustain Mach 3 I want you to do a test for me. Put your car in neutral and hold the gas down so that your RPMs read in the red line. This will simulate your Mig 31 pushing maximum engine performance (to achieve top speed)
Do this for 30 minutes and let me know what happens.
SantaClaws488 20 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SantaClaws488 wrote:BTW, if you think the Mig 31 can sustain Mach 3 I want you to do a test for me. Put your car in neutral and hold the gas down so that your RPMs read in the red line. This will simulate your Mig 31 pushing maximum engine performance (to achieve top speed)
Do this for 30 minutes and let me know what happens.
-How many experiments did it take you to figure out that car in neutral won't move let alone do Mach3. What does it have to do with MiG-31 reaching Mach3?
RussianThunderrr 3 hours ago
Yah try to sound smart by mentioning tail wind when you didn't even know what it was until I mentioned it.
The only thing I see wrong with your comparison is your blatant ignorance. One the top speed of the f22 is classified. Two, I garauntee Mach 2.35 is in clean configuration. How long can it sustain that TGT? How much does range decrease? Can it do it with a weapons load and all that drag? No. Is it a useful metric? Not at all. Your ignorance is through the roof.
SantaClaws488 2 days ago
Read what I wrote dumbass. I said if your instruments read 120 kts and you do a 30 degree crab. Jokes aside just stop posting because practically everything you've written has been completely wrong. Ground speed is the most accurate measurement. Ground speed can be faster than what your instruments say. Pilots calculate gs ALL the time. You know NOTHING about aviation.
SantaClaws488 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SantaClaws488 dude, and another question: why do you keep insulting everyone who argues with you? you keep calling people names, spitting out hate. and especially your racial or nazist comments, like when you're calling someone dumb russian. what the fuck is wrong with you?!!! i will ask you again, is your life really is THAT boring, empty, and pathetic, that you must insult everyone just to try and make yourself feel like a bigger man?
val28l 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SantaClaws488 p.s. sure is easy to talk shit to people on the youtube. bet $10 you woudn't say that shit to someone's face. on a side note, you don't go out much, do you?
val28l 2 days ago
@SantaClaws488 wrote:"Read what I wrote dumbass."
-- I read you fine, its you dirty mouth who have a reading comprehension problems, and occasionally claiming false ideas and present 'em as my.
Ok, lets try again.
RussianThunderrr 2 days ago
@SantaClaws488 wrote:"Jokes aside just stop posting because practically everything you've written has been completely wrong. Ground speed is the most accurate measurement. Ground speed can be faster than what your instruments say."
Su-37 capable of Mach 2.35 despite a very strong head wind, while F-22 can barely do Mach 2.25 even with a tail wind. Anything wrong with this picture? ;)
RussianThunderrr 2 days ago
@RussianThunderrr
"Su-37 capable of Mach 2.35 despite a very strong head wind, while F-22 can barely do Mach 2.25 even with a tail wind"
BTW, this has to be one of the dumbest things you've written to date. It really highlights your lack of understanding. I talk about headwinds etc and you try to use it in a sentence and what you write just makes you look like an idiot.
Considering hurricane force winds are ~100 kts what "strong headwind" are you talking about? You're dumb.
SantaClaws488 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SantaClaws488 well, just looking at his post, i really don't think he was talking about hurricane type winds. now, i have no idea about f-22 or su-anything top or any other speed. but i can tell a "strong wing" from a "hurricane". "strong wind" is when you go outside, and it is really windy outside. like not a golf day at all. and "hurricane" wind, is when you go outside, and the wind tears off your ass, and tosses it into the next state. i really don't think he was talking about
val28l 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SantaClaws488 that. see, again, you're trying to make it look, like a person that you are arguing with said something, that he never did. and again, with all the insults. no one here insults you, by the way. people are trying their best to be polite. but again, you go around cursing at everyone. i will say this again: bet $10 you wouldn't say this to his face.
val28l 1 day ago
@SantaClaws488
/This is how absurd it sounds like when someone brings head and tail wind into aircraft top speed specifications, what do you say about this?/
--"Su-37 capable of Mach 2.35 despite a very strong head wind, while F-22 can barely do Mach 2.25 even with a tail wind"
--"this has to be one of the dumbest things you've written to date."
Thank you Santa, it does sound ridiculous, eh?, but where in that quote did you find ~100kts "strong headwind", still beats me...
RussianThunderrr 1 day ago
Comment removed
SantaClaws488 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@RussianThunderrr
Considering that most winds you'll encounter are ~30 knots or less, it's pretty negligible in terms of trying to achieve mach 2 since that would be ~1400 kts. My pint is that your "strong headwind" doesn't exist unless we're talking about hurricane force winds because a 30kts headwind is nothing. Of course you're a dumb ass so you just wrote that sentence by pulling it from your ass, just like the rest of your "knowledge".
SantaClaws488 1 day ago
Oh btw, aircraft speed is not always greater than ground speed. If you have a tail wind your ground speed will be greater. That's why ground speed is the most accurate way to determine your speed, especially when trying to determine your eta because your instruments will always be less accurate. But please, continue to keep talking about shit you know nothing about.
SantaClaws488 2 days ago
imagine how nice life would be if people didn't spend half our time trying to kill each other.
kittenvideosareawwww 2 days ago
Oh wow you are really dumb. I can't believe you are still posting.
One, dumbass, the pitot tube will give you a false reading if you crab into the wind. That's just one of many examples. If you are 30 degrees into the wind your instruments can say 120 kts but your true airspeed will be something else. If your instrument say 100 kts and you have a 100 kts headwind then your true airspeed will be 0. Stop posting because you are a clueless idiot.
SantaClaws488 2 days ago
@SantaClaws488 Lol if you crabbing for landing 30 degrees into 100 kts gusting wind your chances for crashing is is almost 100%. :)
Jokes aside, in aircraft specifications when you see speed representation in Mach number is not a ground speed by definition FYI, but aircraft actual speed that flying through the air.
RussianThunderrr 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SantaClaws488 wrote:"That's just one of many examples. If you are 30 degrees into the wind your instruments can say 120 kts but your true airspeed will be something else. If your instrument say 100 kts and you have a 100 kts headwind then your true airspeed will be 0."
BTW if your power settings of the aircraft in this situation have to be set as if aircraft flying 100 kts, but if your engine set for airspeed 0 in a 100kts wind, then your aircraft crash unavoidable. ;)
RussianThunderrr 2 days ago
..., and the whole point that I asked you SantaClaws about how aircraft measure its airspeed, is when you start to claiming that aircraft ground is the most accurate airspeed, which is not.
Point is that aircraft flight instruments don't compute true airspeed as a function of ground speed and wind speed, not to mention that aircraft actual speed is always going to be greater then aircraft ground speed. ;)
RussianThunderrr 2 days ago 4
LOLOLOLOL too bad I was out all day flying in a Cesna and crashing my RC.
Eagle1oh7 2 days ago
Omg lol russianretard realized what a tool he was and deleted all his posts. Go run home to mommy little boy. Spend two weeks building up your googlefu and confidence so you can cone back here and get destroyed by me again.
SantaClaws488 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SantaClaws488 ok, your stupidity outdoes your insanity at this point. who deleted his own posts? i see no "comments has been removed by the author" signs or w/e is it that youtube says when you delete your own post. i mean, the russianthunder's comment, that was between my comment an hour ago and your comment from 2 hours ago (i think it was there), is no longer there, yes, but it is because it got moved from its original spot to the "top rated comments". you know, the 2 top
val28l 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SantaClaws488 comments that any video has. ironic, that you call others stupid. by the way, why is it, that when ever you're running out of arguments, you're just starting to insult other posters? you've spitted out so many curses in the last 2 days, like, 10 times more then all the other posters combined. i mean, do you think that insulting someone else makes you right? or is your life really that empty and pathetic, that you just feel the need to insult others?
val28l 3 days ago
A whiz wheel is not a gps you retard. It's a modified slide rule and has been around almost as long as planes have. You really can't stop being a dumbass can you?
SantaClaws488 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SantaClaws488 wrote:"A whiz wheel is not a gps you retard. It's a modified slide rule and has been around almost as long as planes have."
Once again you confusing instrument gauge that give an airspeed of the aircraft, with navigational tool that helps estimate/guess ground airspeed, that is frankly irrelevant as a point in this particular part of the discussion, since airplane "don't fly on the ground".
RussianThunderrr 3 days ago
Oh I guess I'm not a "real pilot" because I use what's available in the aircraft for me. So I guess the Russians aren't "real pilots" either because they use force trim, fly by wire, and radios instead of signal flash lights. I'm sure they want to be real pilots and not use any of their aids so they can be completely overwhelmed in the cockpit causing them to crash at airshows at a high rate. Oh wait...
SantaClaws488 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SantaClaws488 dude, i'm sorry, and don't take it the wrong way, but when i read some of your posts, you sound almost insane.
val28l 3 days ago 3
@val28l
That's because most of you are borderline retarded. Hell two people liked Russiandurrrr's post about the whiz wheel being a GPS and not existing even though its existed since the 1930's. None of them even bothered to google what a whiz wheel is. That basically tells me fanboys will be fanboys and incredibly stupid.
SantaClaws488 2 days ago
@SantaClaws488 wrote:"Hell two people liked Russiandurrrr's post about the whiz wheel being a GPS and not existing even though its existed since the 1930's."
--Hold on, SantaClaws, I asked you a specific question -> How actual airspeed is measured? ... and you give me a schizophrenic answer:
--GPS or "modified slide rule" called "whiz wheel".
I never called whiz wheel been a GPS or vise versa.
RussianThunderrr 2 days ago
Comment removed
RussianThunderrr 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SantaClaws488 dude, has it ever crossed your mind, that maybe, just maybe, when everyone around you are pointing at you and laughing, there is a tiny, small chance, that you are the one who is wrong? i mean, it seems to me, that the idea that you could be wrong, doesn't even crosses your mind for a second. you know, psychiatrists say, that crazy people never believe that they are crazy, they think that everyone around them are. you seem to have the same denial. just saying.
val28l 2 days ago
Like I said they used the whiz wheel. That's been around since the 30s. Keep trying to sound smart. Because it keeps making you look like a bigger dumb ass. Why are you even replying? Do you really think your gigantic knowledge gap is going to beat me when you didn't even know theres a difference with kias, tas, and ground speed? You don't even know what a whiz wheel is and think its a gps. You're such a fucking idiot.
SantaClaws488 3 days ago
@SantaClaws488 wrote:You don't even know what a whiz wheel is and think its a gps.
Just wonder what makes you think so? You the one who said that GPS were used to figure out ground speed. To this I can tell you that satellites was not around, when sound barrier was broken, pitot tube was used to measure aircraft airspeed, below and above supersonic speeds. ;)
RussianThunderrr 3 days ago 5
Oh you can also use the whiz wheel. Oh, never knew that existed huh? Yah thought so. Like I said just stop posting and proving to me what a waste of oxygen you are.
SantaClaws488 3 days ago
Way to prove how utterly ignorant you are again. Unlike technology backwards russua us military aircraft have gps which gives you your ground speed. You aren't in the same league as me. You're not even planet. Stop trying to prove you know something when you've never touched a control stick when I have a 1.5 million dollar training program and real aircraft hours behind me.
SantaClaws488 3 days ago
Comment removed
RussianThunderrr 3 days ago
I'm gonna educate your retarded ass again. I said ground speed is the most ACCURATE way to measure speed. Do you know what that word means?
Your pitot tube can give you readings of 120 kts but if you have a 10 kts headwind your true airspeed is 110 kts.
And I meant no plane cruises with after burners on.
For what it's worth dumb asses like you who are dumb enough to think they know more than real pilots because they read wiki are a dime a dozen.
SantaClaws488 3 days ago
@SantaClaws488 wrote:"I'm gonna educate your retarded ass again. I said ground speed is the most ACCURATE way to measure speed. Do you know what that word means?
Your pitot tube can give you readings of 120 kts but if you have a 10 kts headwind your true airspeed is 110 kts."
--Go on... Tell as how it goes figuring out from pitot tube readings to ground speed?
RussianThunderrr 3 days ago
SU 37 - MASTER OF THE SKY!!!
PRIBOMBASS 3 days ago
Российские истребители лучшие в мире.
snaiper118 3 days ago 28
@snaiper118 да у россии вся техника лучшая зато они нехира кроме вооружения делать не умеют
SHYT97 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SHYT97 а что им ещё надо делать уметь?
val28l 3 days ago
@snaiper118 Na ostnovanii chego?
alexisayev1986 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@alexisayev1986 ну, на основании хотя бы того, что надавали пизд.лей американцам и в корее, и во въетнаме, а ведь самолётами могль только одной рукой управлять (другой приходилось глаза к вискам оттягивать). ну и сам факт того, что он может писать по-русски, когда по русски говорит, a ne pishet vot tak, kak posledniy мудак.
val28l 1 day ago
@snaiper118 то почему F 22 победу
jjm34a1 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jjm34a1 i think i see what you are trying to say there. did you used the auto translator? but anyhow, the only way for us to know, which plane is better, is for usa to go to war with russia, and then we will all die an a horrible way. on the bright side, we'll be attacking syria soon, so we might see some f-22 vs russian type jets soon.
val28l 21 hours ago
just syain theres a plane that can do 6000mph the aircraft is called a x41 its like the fastest plane in the world
rambo2557 5 days ago
F-22 Raptor:
Top speed with afterburning 2100 km/h (2,0 M) (maybe 2600 km/h (2,42 М)
Top speed without afterburning: 1850 км/ч (1,78 М)
cruising speed: 950 km/h (0,9 М)
Su-37 Terminator:
Top speed (no details with or without afterburning) 2500 km/h (2,33M)
cruising speed 1M
u9040 5 days ago
@u9040
That's not right. No plane can cruise at Mach 1+ unless it has super cruise because it requires wet thrust to accomplish that. That's why the F22 is so good and can super cruise at mach 1+ and has such a tremendous advantage over gen 4 fighters.
SantaClaws488 5 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SantaClaws488 wrote:"That's not right. No plane can cruise at Mach 1+ unless it has super cruise because it requires wet thrust to accomplish that."
--Santa, looks like you confusing "cruise speed" with "super cruise" capability feature. F-22 super cruise speed is Mach 1.4 with Max speed at Mach 2.25, while MiG-31 for example have cruise speed of Mach 2.35 with a Max speed at Mach 3.
RussianThunderrr 4 days ago
@SantaClaws488 wrote:"That's why the F22 is so good and can super cruise at mach 1+ and has such a tremendous advantage over gen 4 fighters. That's why the F22 is so good and can super cruise at mach 1+ and has such a tremendous advantage over gen 4 fighters."
Rafale, Eurofighter and Su-35 have a super cruise feature now, all gen 4 fighters. ;)
RussianThunderrr 4 days ago
@RussianThunderrr
LOL no they don't. They say they do but they still need wet thrust. And there is no way they can super cruise with external stores. Sorry to break your heart.
For a plane to super cruise it has to be designed that way from the ground up. You can't just put engines on a plane and all of a sudden it can super cruise.
SantaClaws488 4 days ago
@SantaClaws488 You still confusing "cruise speed" with "super cruise", just like your friend Eag11e confused "stall" with a "stall speed". :)
Super cruise is merely supersonic flight without use of afterburner, cruise speed is the most efficient speed in terms of distance, speed and fuel usage. MiG-31 is optimized to operate at cruising speed of Mach 2.35 even though it uses afterburner.
RussianThunderrr 3 days ago 2
@RussianThunderrr
LOL! Cruising with afterburner? LOL! You have no clue what you're talking about. You do realize that afterburners require the plane dump fuel directly into the exhaust portion near the nozzle right? Of course you don't because you have no clue what you're talking about. You can "cruise" with after burners maybe 10 minutes tops. Holy shit please stop talking.
The F22 cruises at super cruise dummy. Super cruise uses dry thrust which is why it is better.
SantaClaws488 3 days ago
@RussianThunderrr
LOL, you're a dumb ass.
You don't "cruise with afterburners. You do know that afterburners requires that you dump extra fuel right before the exhaust nozzle, right? Of course not, because you have no clue what you're talking about. With afterburners, you have maybe 10 minutes of fuel at most. No plane "cruises" at after burner speed.
The F22 cruises at its super cruise speed dummy. It uses dry reheat which makes it more efficient. Seriously, stop posting.
SantaClaws488 3 days ago
@SantaClaws488 wrote:"No plane "cruises" at after burner speed."
Can you explain what "after burner speed" is?
RussianThunderrr 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SantaClaws488 wrote:"For a plane to super cruise it has to be designed that way from the ground up. You can't just put engines on a plane and all of a sudden it can super cruise."
--Putting an engine on plane with enough thrust to overcome drag at supersonic speeds is exactly how its done, Lyulka's Saturn engine is achieve it by enlarging a bypass fan unit.
RussianThunderrr 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@RussianThunderrr
"Putting an engine on plane with enough thrust to overcome drag at supersonic speeds is exactly how its done, Lyulka's Saturn engine is achieve it by enlarging a bypass fan unit."
Oh the retard who knows nothing about planes chimes in again. Really? So we can just put them on a C-130 and it will break the sound barrier huh? I don't think so dumb ass.
SantaClaws488 2 days ago
@u9040 number of Su-37's built....2
contributor34 4 days ago
@u9040 Fighter jet maximum speed is always at high altitude with a full afterburner.
Also since the speed of sound will vary depending on the density of the air, which in terms depends on an altitude and weather conditions, ground speed is inaccurate way to use in measuring aircraft speed, so Mach number is used.
RussianThunderrr 4 days ago
@RussianThunderrr
WHAT?!?! Ground speed is the most accurate way to determine your speed. Holy crap stop posting you know jack shit about aviation.
SantaClaws488 4 days ago
@SantaClaws488 wrote:"WHAT?!?! Ground speed is the most accurate way to determine your speed."
Ground speed, really? It would be easier to determine if planes would roll on the ground for a duration of the flight, but they don't, so "Pitot Tube" is used to determine aircraft speed in case you did not know. BTW you a first person who claimed to be a "pilot", but don't know how aircraft speed is measured.
RussianThunderrr 3 days ago
Those su-37 maneuvers are crazy.. Both jets are awesome.. What are the top speeds for each?
BostonMa55acr3 5 days ago
@BostonMa55acr3 Max speed at Mach 2.35 for Su-37 and Mach 2.25 for F-22 which amounts to a ~100 km/h speed difference.
RussianThunderrr 4 days ago
Су 37 - не повелитель неба. Он царь и бог неба!
Geilias 5 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
or, maybe, just maybe, he wasn't "killing unarmed civilians who wanted a change in government", maybe, he was killing the alkaeda (you know, the one that blew up the towers on 9/11) members, who were trying to overthrow the rightful government? i mean, is there a small, tiny chance that what foxnews tells you could be, you know, lie? just like, you know, "the weapons of mass destruction" that sadam had? you know, the leader of the country that got attacked by nato, for no reason it seems.
val28l 5 days ago
To all the Lybia detractors, so you are perfectly fine with Gaddafi killing unarmed civilians who wanted a change in government?
SantaClaws488 5 days ago
@SantaClaws488 unarmed civilians who hawe weapon ? nice idiot : )
waaasteee 5 days ago
@waaasteee
Yah those babies sure look dangerous.
SantaClaws488 5 days ago
Comment removed
TheWhiteboy3431 6 days ago
Fuck Russia lets hear for their depopulation and suicide rates.
TheWhiteboy3431 6 days ago
@TheWhiteboy3431 you are bored, aren't you?
val28l 6 days ago
Comment removed
TheWhiteboy3431 6 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@val28l
No and your youtube channel shows you have national pride for Russia but turned out FALSE when I looked at country.... what a disgrace you are for the "motherland"
TheWhiteboy3431 6 days ago
difference is obvious,russia f.cks usa
kdvdahil 6 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
सुखोई यह रूस की एक महान कंपनी है. इस कंपनी ने दुनिया को बेहतरीन हवाई जहाज दिए है. दुनिया के कई देश इस कंपनी के मिलिटरी लड़ाकू विमान इस्तेमाल कर रहे है. भारत रूस का पारंपरिक मित्र देश है. अत्याधुनिक सुखोई भारतीय वायु सेना को सुशोभित करते है. भारत और रूस की दोस्ती इस दुनिया के अंत तक कायम बनी रहे. जय हिंद.
MrIndianpatriot 1 week ago
Красивый пилотаж! И борт необыкновенно красивый! Радует.
Огорчили американские комментаторы. Они совсем без башни что-ли? Открыто обсуждают, что 29 МИГи некачественные, а за 2-3 года Россия не успеет изготовить 37-е в достаточном количестве! В достаточном для чего??? Т.е. тупые котики уже в уведомлённом ожидании срока начала вооружённой продажи их дерьмократии России?
VasiaSaraev 1 week ago 3
Америкосы не забывайте что Стелс Еффект тоже русская разработка.
Россия непобедима!
sench92 1 week ago
@sench92 Стелс Еффект? Прям Мас Еффект какой-то. Не забывай, что не в России на практике эту идею впервую применили. Американцы фактически воспользовались только идеей.
AkidUA99 6 days ago
Су 37 - повелитель неба!!!
2006SANJAR 1 week ago 23
@2006SANJAR ясно дело, но когда их полторы штуки
rfghty 4 days ago
Lets go back to the " GUNS ONLY", air combat,, and we will see who are the best pilots!!
Fleax1973 1 week ago
Удивительно как они смогли признать превосходство русского истребителя. Обычно хвалят свое, даже танки.
lilian20ful 1 week ago
@lilian20ful Походу выборы на носу были или денег захотелось больше. Пришлось пугать народ)
Krah87 1 week ago
My hope is to see you drowned in your own shit mixed with your own blood..! Nation of gays and bitches.. When you stand before God to respond for crimes, what will you argue? Will you say It was Hollywoods fault? Or video games fault? Or the White House fault? You, nation of queers, bitches, murderers and drug addicts.. You will pay for each one of your crimes against mankind!
TheodenEisher 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheodenEisher
"My hope is to see you drowned in your own shit mixed with your own blood..! "
Wrath and pride are 2 of the 7 deadly sins so I guess we'll see you there!
SantaClaws488 1 week ago
@TheodenEisher LOL, you Christains are a walking joke machine.
Eagle1oh7 1 week ago in playlist Favorite videos
@Eagle1oh7 Laugh while you can... before your mouth gets filled with your own shit mixed with you blood... ! Laugh out loud !
TheodenEisher 1 week ago
@TheodenEisher Are you still posting? I'm amazed you're intelligent enough to remember how to breathe.
Shush, child. No one gives a shit what you have to say.
bayushizero 1 week ago
@Eagle1oh7 Hey now. Not all of us are as retarded as Pokey here.
bayushizero 1 week ago
Goddamned criminals... your crimes to mankind have piled and reached the skies.. You have used all kinds of mass destruction weapons, nuclear bombs, chemical and bacteriologic weapons.. you have invaded, killed and destroyed in the name of "liberty" and "democracy"... Mexico, Cuba, Philippines, Nicaragua, Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, Iran, Panama, Grenada, Serbia, Kosovo, Libia, Lebanon..
TheodenEisher 1 week ago
@TheodenEisher You're a moron.
We did not invade Mexico. They are invading us, daily. We did not invade the Philippines, we liberated them from the Japanese. We did not invade Korea, we defended the South from Chinese communist aggression. We did not invade Vietnam, see Korea. We did not invade Serbia, we kept it free. Kosovo? Really?
We never set foot in Libya, and we had a presence in Lebanon dating back to WW2.
Get your facts straight or make like a tree and STFU.
Shoo!
bayushizero 1 week ago
@bayushizero you're a moron, NATO orchestrated the whole invasion of Libya, and if the criminals in the us govt didn't want it to happen it would not have happened. best wake your own ass up.
TrpleAgnt2011 1 week ago
@TrpleAgnt2011 Hey retard.
WHAT INVASION?!
Are you daft, or just fucking stupid?
We bombed Libya (not the first time). No American or NATO troops stepped foot into Libya.
Try extracting your cranium from your rectal cavity, please.
bayushizero 6 days ago
@bayushizero actually, both french and english had their special forces in libya, assisting the "rebels", who, as it turns out, were alcaida. and us had "special consultants" there as well. on top of that. are you actualy proud that "all we did was "We bombed Libya (not the first time). No American or NATO troops stepped foot into Libya."" i mean, us and nato bombed a defenseless country, and that is supposed to be ok?
val28l 5 days ago
@bayushizero
It tells you Uncle Sam? Or you're on your deceitful television watching?
MrSerbr 6 days ago
@MrSerbr You comment made no sense at all.
I have friends who were on the ground in Bosnia, and served with a few in the Army. I have family who served in/over Korea and Vietnam.
So... What? You made no sense.
bayushizero 6 days ago
@bayushizero
What are they doing there, probably defending America? What did the American instructors in Georgia, when she shot to the residents of South Ossetia? Who gives weapons to militants in Syria? After the so-called revolution in Libya is on the brink of civil slaughter. Tell me what you need there? Where you are democracy, there is blood and falling oil prices.
MrSerbr 5 days ago
Starscream Ha-Ha-Ha )))
seporatority 1 week ago
SU-37 no stealth..we win!!
justcauseitspure 1 week ago
@justcauseitspure nad F-117 is stealt who shot down with 45 year old system !
waaasteee 1 week ago
@waaasteee
It was airframe failure. A design flaw which was later rectified.
Ngutovi 1 week ago
@justcauseitspure you don't need stealth to win, you need numbers
josanjosan 1 week ago
@josanjosan An isareli sherman tank single handedly destroyed 4 t52 tanks.In the second indo-pakistan war several fighter jets of british and russian make were downed by a few american f-86 sabers.The list goes on and on and on.The point is ,when it comes to warfare,quality(of men and equipment) matters a LOT.
Ngutovi 1 week ago 4
@Ngutovi ..please read about the COPE INDIA air war games...you might find it interesting
satyamd 5 days ago
@Ngutovi Quality of men.
The sherman tank, obviously had a crew that were trained.
4 T-52's? I don't even think a T-52 is real. Maybe you mean the T-54/55?
Again, crew training. If it came down to a crew as trained as the Sherman crew, I'm pretty sure that the Sherman would be cottage cheese.
Sp3tsnazFTW 5 days ago
@justcauseitspure
Open your eyes. In Serbia, the stealth shot down by the old Soviet anti-aircraft missile! And the characteristics of Honour SU-37 or Su-35.
MrSerbr 6 days ago
all this arguing ? all Christians should unite now while the Islamists are weak. you do know what they plan to do to the kaffir right? our religion adapts with the times, Islam is stuck in 10th century desert nomad traditions and attitudes. if they get the chance they will cut off all our balls and make us harem guards
surfgodx 1 week ago
@surfgodx
If u believe in their god they will leave you alone its written in their book
hudspeed 1 week ago
@hudspeed And if you believe that then I would like to sell you some beutiful beachfront property in Tibet.
surfgodx 1 week ago 4
Дело нам не хватает здесь русских инженеров есть талант. Имейте в виду, после Второй мировой войны только не американская наука процветает за счет притока русских и немецких ученых. Теперь это не так ... Они умершего, старые и или в отставке. Это новое поколение тупее, чем их родители. Я читал, что на видео работы внутри которой говорится о том, как американцы уничтожили их экономики ... Так или иначе ...
Afaye03 1 week ago
The discussion of which is better is silly. We will never know unless they meet in combat, which we hope they do not.
lasourisaboyante 1 week ago
Any plane with canards gets the thumbs-down from me. It just is evidence of control being an after-thought. You don't see the F-22 doing anything "spectacular" on video because its limits, still, may be secret, so-to-speak. We NEVER will see what the F-22 can do until someone decides he wants to lose some of his own aircraft.
red33432 1 week ago
Мэйд ин Раша, чё!
J0k3rby 1 week ago
f-117 now is stealth yes but is old
pak-fa
and j-20 make lesson in world
again russia rap usa
if usa build 800 meters plane russia too built 800 meters plane
american dont accept other country have stealth plane
and its russia and china so tankee was totally crazy
like new t-90ms and many other .....
TATARSTAN59500 1 week ago
@TATARSTAN59500 Welcome to 25 years behind, bro.
You (and the rest of us) have no idea what the US is working on now. The Russian and Chinese aircraft are not even in production yet, much less in the field. The F117 has been in the field for over 20 years, with the F32 in the field for 10. The difference is that the United States ALREADY HAS their aircraft. Neither Russia nor China can make that claim.
bayushizero 1 week ago
@bayushizero we have crisp idea on whom the US serves now, and you might step back and think how much time it took to kill JFK who decided to print America's money and not jewish ones.
But you won't listen to me, maybe a film by Aaron Russo (an American who died shortly after) named "America: From Freedom To Fascism" and your own eyes to compare what he talks about with what you see around will help.
Did they teach you condoms at school back then? And now?
PS: insults are cheap.
mshigorin 3 days ago
I will review the source you provided. Do not expect further comments today..
MiniVimpel 1 week ago
@MiniVimpel
Don't bother. Even though you claimed you aren't 16, there's a video n your page with you telling us that you're 16 in the description. Why lie? Why tell me to go to your page that shows your lying?
Anyways, you're 16 and this stuff is way over your head. You really don't have the slightest understanding of what you're talking about. And honestly, I doubt the intelligence of someone who claims something (age) and then shoves me in the direction which discredits them.
SantaClaws488 1 week ago
now do you have a source which claims that f-22 hull is designed to counter L-band as much as X-band? Considering that L-band waves are 15-30 cm against 2.5-4 cm of x-band I do not see how f-22 could've been designed to negate effects of L-band as much as X-band.
MiniVimpel 1 week ago
@MiniVimpel
“History of Aviation Technology” Bernado Malfitano
SantaClaws488 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MiniVimpel
"Considering that L-band waves are 15-30 cm against 2.5-4 cm of x-band I do not see how f-22 could've been designed to negate effects of L-band as much as X-band. "
Oh Jesus Christ. I just explained signal cancellation to you again since it was "high school stuff" and it went completely over your head. Holy shit I'm done with you. I can't believe people as dumb as you make it in life without crash helmets.
SantaClaws488 1 week ago
Santa,
I never started on fighter aircraft simulations tactics. You seem to be so desperate to win this argument that you focusing attention away from technology side to f-22 fan boy side. Now f-22 is a great aircraft I'm not going to argue, but you fail to recognize potential, current and future, of L-band radars. Cos, sin, tangent? That's high school stuff man. Btw to clarify if you did go to my channel to see my age on channel, I'm not 16.
MiniVimpel 1 week ago
@MiniVimpel
"That's high school stuff man."
If it's so easy then you have no problem understanding that all you need to do is shift the wavelength 2/pi (via skin thickness )and you cancel it out, effectively negating L-band.
I'm not an F22 fanboy. I'm just not a dumb ass who thinks you can beat it using old technology the makers were aware of and had access to, technology the F22 was designed to counter (radar).
SantaClaws488 1 week ago
@SantaClaws488
pi/2*
SantaClaws488 1 week ago
For all you L-band fanboys, sorry but I'm going to break your heart.
The F22 is going to see any non stealth plane before it's ever detected on L-band. The F22 will see them and is not going to be stupid enough to approach head on where he will be seen in return. He will sneak up from the side or behind with his super cruise and shove an AIM120 at mach 6 right up the Russian's ass. If the Russian is lucky his RWR will go off 2 seconds right before he becomes a fireball.
SantaClaws488 1 week ago
Santa, You seem to fail before you have even started! Do you know what Microwave vs radio wave is? Doesn't seem you understand what L-band is! Sorry, but your replies are very childish!
tropickman 1 week ago
@tropickman
Too bad microwaves are the same thing as radio waves (electromagnetic waves). What country were you educated in again? Clearly not the US.
SantaClaws488 1 week ago
Doesn't really matter what you have to say, or how many times you repeat nonsense. We are simply exchanging ideas. Secondly, when it comes to Russian technology, you would be surprised with their new NEBO VHS AESA radars, and their new emitter locators. You seem to fail to recognize that shaping an object can be focused on a certain frequency, or several frequencies, but once waves become the same size as the shaped object, that object looses its controlled scattering ability!
tropickman 1 week ago
@tropickman
Like I said, the F22 is optimized for signal cancellation in the low band frequency.
Do you honestly think you're smarter than the 100s of engineers with the PHDs in electrical, mechanical and aeronautical engineering because you read something on the internet that you don't even fully understand except to parrot what was written by someone equally as clueless as you. HAHAHA
SantaClaws488 1 week ago
And btw you still hadn't provided a source which can testify to your f-22 designed to counter L-band as much as X-bandwidth statement..Don't be a troll now, at least try to provide detailed explanation.
MiniVimpel 1 week ago
Santa doesn't seem to be knowledgeable when it comes to technology! He doesn't seem to understand the laws of physics. Then again, he is American!
tropickman 1 week ago
@MiniVimpel
I already did. If you do not understand sin, cos and basic trigonometry I'm not going to bother teaching it to you or explain wave/signal cancellation.
SantaClaws488 1 week ago
Exactly! You don't belong here! You belong paying for those expensive, and already redundant platforms like the F-35, designed to suck up as much taxpayer money as possible!
tropickman 1 week ago