You may have something here. This is something I don't understand, but you went to a heck of a lot of trouble to make this thing. There are other way to produce a closed system, however seems to be ....I have heard of this method before. Why not write a paper on this thing?
what u did man is creating an equation .. the e=mc2 kind try rotating it more and calculate what spinning its need it to fly in this way :) gooluck! :))
@trx125tracy69 this one was,becouse common sense told me before it started up that 4 motors running inside an object while it turned was going to do nothing,sorry,yes experiment's are worth the time,but it has got to be something more of a challenge,like heating up a chemical,or substance while turning,or earth magnets,turning while spining,all that was going to do is run and spin like a washing machine.
As I looked at the beings, I saw four wheels touching the ground beside them, one wheel belonging to each. The wheels sparkled as if made of beryl. All four wheels looked alinke and were made the same; each wheel had a second wheel turning crosswise within it. The beings could move in any of the four directions they faced, without turning as they moved. --Ezekiel 1:15-18 (Christian Bible)
"We are told by the scientific establishment we live in a universe governed by Newtonian mechanics." Man,what century do you live in? Newtonian mechanics explain things pretty accurately, but i would say we are closer to living in a relativistic universe, as Einstein explained. But i will say, i do love your demonstration. I thought it would be great to create a floating magnetic device that can turn using gyroscopes.. but i decided to play video games instead. Make more videos! thanks
I've always wanted to see this done. The round thing that has the stuff in it when it moves, the numbers below it.. touching that white thing down there. pretty cool.
I dont understand how this device DOESNT break the law of concervation of momentum (For every action, their is an equal and opposite reaction). Ie. their is no mass actually being thrusted in the opposite direction with the same amount of momentum as the saucer.
Seems like a good experiment though good job, maybe if we try enough things and share what might or does not work, thus deductive elimination, someday someone will build something that works beyond a doubt.
You would need a much faster sampling rate to capture the average weight while your device is spinning. My guess is that the error lies in that measurement.
Or you could have built a sort of propeller. If you repeated this in a vacuum with very precise equipment, you wouldn't see anything that breaks our current laws of physics.
How I would want to believe that... However, I'm afraid 250 grams, because of the wobbling of that machine, would still put it within the margin of error. Maybe if it was better balanced, nothing would happen. Maybe there would. If I were you, I'd see if I could balance it out better, just to be sure. Nice try.
This video is funny when the apperatus starts wobbling I was in tears. What are you trying to achieve. An man with your inclination and skill needs to put that hard work to something with more punch for the buck. I'll send you some plans if your interested in building something that will levitate. If you have enough resource it will lift you and even a crew.
I made a similar thing out of lego. It lost 30 grams of weight. I know that does not sound like alot, especially when you can get much greater forces from the same motors, but it could be a proof of concept worth investigating further. Now I can tell you that neither of our "prototypes" are exactly precision engineered, so maybe the force is being generated by the gyros spinning slightly in a plane that was not intended.
@radbot1 I made a similar thing from meccano, it lifted x4 4x4 wheels past verticle. I guess about 40gramms. but the machine weight was 1kg so 40g means nothing to total weight. I was searching old patents two months ago and found a us patent for an ionic engine with a remote control gimble navigation device. The inventer invisioned it's use as an antimissile device. I'm sure it could be upscaled to lift humans and more with today power supplies. Now that's lift! Ionic grid engine not lifter!
There's nothing about your conclusions that are correct. Also, quantum entanglement, really? Try a little harder. That statement doesn't even make sense. Quantum entanglement is.. For thought experiment purposes, imagine two atoms. One has a chance to decay after a certain time, which will affect with 100% certainty the atom next to it. If we see that the first atom has decayed, then that means the second atom MUST be in the corresponding state.
Free energy has been here for a while ,But the Oil coporations life depends on covering this up,Get a motor that needs no gas or electric input at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Join the revolution!
It is possible that the EM field from the motors interacted with the ions exiting the earth's core thus making it slightly lighter. See ion wind. I have seen this before with 20 ton generators. They were not bolted to the floor and would move after running at high speeds. Just speculating.
@GateMessenger I have a compressor that moves by it'self when active. I suspect the low frequency vibrations made your 20ton monster move and not ionic wind.
@bigstiggerNo1 Yes, one would think that a 20 ton generator would not be able to move though. Like I said, to test the theory all one would have to do is weigh an object to the nearest thousandths on either side to see if there is any difference in the pull of gravity. If there is any difference then gravity and the ionic wind possibly have something in common.
@GateMessenger I don't get what you mean. Ionic wind is an action with vector and can be used to overcome gravity. Ionic wind is something produced long down the line of presedence from gravity. Gravity is simple a large magnetic gathering. All things are magnetic or dieamagnetic. Mass is gravity if you believe in Einstine. Mass is a collection of atoms at an atomic scale unerstanderable by most humans. Mass is simply a collection of a lot of minute magnets. Inon's are sperated atoms.
@Yezpahr A fan would only work in a gasous atmosphere! Not the point these people are looking for. How does your fan work in outer space and how does it reach speeds required to explore space? You use the term airborne. These men are not looking to fly they are looking to manipulate and surf gravity. Flying through air and becoming a sperate spacial body are two completely different things. The "virgin global flyer" is about the limits of what atmosphere can offer in range/height.
@SonsOfLiberty1765 Why don't you come and help me out in the comments below the video at the link below where I've been fighting off the Zionists all day. watch?v=mvKgj_EjUDw
@SonsOfLiberty1765 Stalked you to this thread? I'm confused, please tell me what other thread we were both on? All my comments are hostile to Zionism and to the FBI and CIA liars who are all traitors to their own American People. The video link I posted is exceptionally hostile to Zionism so are you saying this is a Zionist counter counter plot? I'm interested in what you say but you will have to give more information because I can't find the website you are talking about.
@SonsOfLiberty1765 I tried to subscribe to your channel but you have blocked me so I don't know if you have seen this video in which a Rabbi admits that Talmudic Jews really worship Lucifer, and that the goyum (US) are just cattle owned by Jews. /watch?v=T-fJi9nADKQ This video is the first of four parts.
The Israeli Prime Minister Netinyahu said, "America can dry up and blow away once we finish extracting all the wealth we can from her". Google the quote and see for yourself.
@SonsOfLiberty1765 Seriously, me too. On 9/11 five MOSSAD agents were arrested because they set up video cameras at three different locations to film the planes hitting the WTC. They were released on the orders of the FBI but the video at the link below shows the three MOSSAD agents on Israeli TV saying that they had been sent to New York to film the planes hitting the twin towers and their foreknowledge is proof that 911 was a Zionist plot with FBI protection.
Fact of the matter is you can direct energy or force provided in a gyroscopic pattern to create balanced forces that while spinning at extremely high speed are balanced or otherwise lighter. Turn/slow/jurk/or otherwise knock out of equilibrium and it will be hell fire which ever direction you see fit. Not necessarily up tho, this thing might still need a reasonable fuel source.
@sirHOAX So are you saying that if you could rotate it to extremely high speeds it would eventually levitate but there is now way to control it because if you turn/ jerk it it will go out of control?
Sorry for the time you lost building a trash can lid with some gyros attached. Absolutely pointless. Precession requires the gyro to push against something to create that force. Gyros will never fly retards!
I know why it didn't work, and I know how you can fix it. What you created was pretty much exactly what I made as my first prototype. email me sbinkley @ gmail . com and I'll explain
I know why it didn't work, and I know how you can fix it. What you created was pretty much exactly what I made as my first prototype. email me sbinkley @ gmail . com and I'll explain
@sabriath don't think a vacuum has anything to do with this. Lack of air will just help as there would be less friction. I am not sure if you understand what this experiment is all about.
Wouldn't the mere shape of the object multiplied by rpms create the lift (loss of weght) everyone is so twitchy excited about? A frisbie achieves 0 weight when flung in the right way. Makes less noise too.
A friend and I came up with an almost identical concept when we were ~ 16 years old and tested it in a not dissimilar way.
Our idea (and I believe yours) is to use the concept of precession to produce non-canceling precession... problem is it doesn't work. Equal and opposite always.
Our model used two spinning masses (instead of 4) in opposite directions. Each spinning mass rotated (dependently) - we used a differential. The forces involved caused it to fail- fun =) Can't work - sorry m8.
@xexorz I know why it didn't work, and I know how you can fix it. What you created was pretty much exactly what I made as my first prototype. email me sbinkley @ gmail . com and I'll explain
An Ex-NASA engineer built a small wired remote controlled craft that could actually fly using gyros after an incident he had while replacing a Gyro on a rocket,see they forgot to tell him that it had not fully stopped,this was during the apollo project in the 60s,he built it,it worked,and of course NASA laughed at him,said it wouldnt,this was on the Discovery Channel quite some years ago.What amazes me is here this man had built,flown it right in front of there eyes,what Morons at NASA!!!.
it looks cool but it is a litttle hard to tell exctly what is hapening. maybe you could shoot another video showing what the rod is attached to so we know it is not rotating. you can not see the full base as well, maybe pan out so we can see it is not attached to anything. if this thing really works my request should not be difficult.
In my youtube, We obey the laws of Thermodynamics!!!!
AHAHA
You guys are so cute, and the thing is you think you're the Wright Brothers or similar and feed on the negative comments, but you don't see that you are being a fool.
They laughed at the Wright Brothers, but they also laughed at Bozo the Clown.
The evil "League of Scientists" is not "lying" to you, when they would LOVE to see such an experiment succeed and would give you the Nobel.
Yeah okay, that's a half truth. Look at cold fusion. It has anomalous over-heating that has been reported the world over and just because of one incident, it has been tainted. They may not be suppressing knowledge, but they are suppressing development by being a mob of dick heads.
Know what those laughing scientists are doing? Spending 50+ billion of tax payer dollars on tokamak fusers that produces less fusions per dollar than an inertial confinement fuser invented in the 60's!
'Thermodynamics'? What the hell does that have to do with this anyway?! he's not making a perpetual motion device. If you're gonna whine on the foundation of classical physics, learn them. You're thinking newtons laws of motion, right?
So, you have pretty much labeled yourself as a failure by doing nothing and criticizing other's work. AND you can't even critique other's work with the right material!
Please don't post comments as if you are an expert on the subject. Its counter-productive.
If you ask any inventor they will tell you. As we know it nothing has been invented. We are merely breaking the surface in understanding how mother nature and the cosmos truly works. There are higher powers at play based on the unknown factor, considering its out of reach.
I agree my txt sounded very "above looking down".. im sorry for tht. I hate my writings there really.
However, I did finally learned why gyroscope preceses, and how it perfectly preserve and respond to every laws in physics. But I too still belive there might be a rightful use of gyrscope that can lead to a propuslion.
Thts why I love yoru video so much. I learned something first time I saw it (long time ago), and was my step to my understanding of it. I too would have built it ifu didnt
I think you are close with this principle how ever the device I see in my head has the small gyros axisis all pointing in to the main axsis at a 45 degree angle. / l \ If you think about it like a merry-go-round the small gyros will have more momentum/energy on their upward swing near the outside of the large gyro than they do on their downward swing near the center of the larger gyro.
I don't think that your input power would have to be rediculous just stable.
although i can see why you would want the 45 degree angle but it wont work.. your getting to close to that linear force and it'll just end up canceling out!
I see a device like this but with seven gyros and their axis are set parallel to the plate's spin axis. Then as you ramp up speed, you begin to tilt the gyros, see if anything other than wobbling happens with different types of tilting... It would need servos and coordinated radio control to tilt the gyros as/when intended, but maybe. Also maybe six gyros instead of seven....
All someone needs for this, is a compact unlimited power source. Literally sky is the limit. There have been many people stating similar observations of next to light-speed travel. Just using high-power discharge of electromagnetic fields to static coils of opposite polarity. Who can be the judge of any of this. With out clear evidence of disproof.
This device could be along those same lines, more power higher speed rpm. Tilt and yield kinetic energy of a newton's "law" translating movement.
There was that guy who was in the British air force, who had taken a gyro out of a jet fighter while it was still turning, and the moment his feet touched the ground he received what he described as a massive blow to (his) back, do you remember his name? Based upon his experience he did some work along these lines, and I think his site is still up that describes some of it, can't remember his name...His device looked like a "T" with gyros on each end. Got weight fluctuations, but not sustained.
I know a lot of people are experimenting with these things, but what may help is this new tech from Witricity (see site) where you could wirelessly send power to the gyros and the servos to move them. If you could find a pattern of movement for gyros, and repeat it using a computer, then yeah, you could use their inertia to keep a consistant force applied in one direction? The trick is discovering the pattern, # of gyros, and balance. Don't know why 7 sticks in my head, should be 6 (or 4)
There's also the small matter of some danger with some of it, I am a bit concerned some of these home experimenters might accidently hurt themselves (or someone in their neighborhood), you can get some high voltages out of disassembled cathode ray tube parts. I also wonder if that may be a setback elsewhere, maybe in more 'deep pocketed' experiments, if unusual characteristics at higher voltages might've put a hold on some types of testing until more can be learned about it (if true).
Put your money where your mouth is and build a bigger and better version. Or do you lack the skills to do so? From looking at your lack of videos on experimental platforms appears this is indeed the case.
This is not my experiment, but I do respect the individual's time and energy for providing this video. You are more than welcome to follow the link provided in the 'INFO' panel on your right.
I do not think so, either use a gyroscopic effect, but in fact the discs tend to turn on themselves until you have the same rotation of the large disk, you need to search for information on Gyroscopic.
I am interested in inertial mass propulsion, and as you have no money, but I suggest that you follow a path more "impressive" for your videos, try to build a "balanced" it takes a lot of speed, and then changes its configuration and off balance, "single shot" the effect will be more attractive
This is to anyone out there. I don't know anything about magnetism or whatever. Is there anyway of using electromagnetism. Meaning using opposing magnetic force in combination with an electric current to create some sort of propulsion. In other words, something to replace gas or diesel engines in vehicles. creating a new era of transportation. Maybe someone has already came up with that idea.
there's a few way to use magnetic for propulsion.. you just need to decide which method you wish to use.. and then go from there!! and if you have decided that there is only one way. well i guess you have your answer!
the speed that you have the four disks don't need to be that high if your not spinning the main disk fast!!
the small disks.. lets say 320 rmps
and you spin the main disk.. there is a maximum force that you will get out of it.. so spinning the large disk beyond that is point less. and its rather pointless to have the small disks spinning so fast if the main big disk isn't spinning fast. (waste of energy)
Hmmm how about publishing the data i'm sure you meticulously collected while performing this experiment ad naseum to rule out any possible error, so others can analyse it?
It is a shame that we couldn't see the reading on the scale itself, but only the tachometer. I find it interesting that the rpm of the gyroscopes dropped as the assembly increased in angular velocity. This may be related to microphone placement and Doppler shift, but it could be a transfer of energy from the gyros to some other field. If so, then the device could be seeking equilibrium in that field essentially pulling itself up by its own bootstraps. The gravitational field perhaps?
What, does it get lighter? Can't tell with your scale. Try tilting the axis of all the gyro's, then see what happens, that is what I would do. You may get a better result.
You apply a torque from each of the motors onto each gyroscope, the gyroscopes translate this torque to the plane on the body and the torque accelerates the body. This is basic physics, a proof of the thrid law, not a disproof...
Have you taken into account the energy you are using to spin those gyroscopes? I bet if you did all the math and factored in efficiency you would find you aren't really doing anything spectacular.
message to Krachn11235 those numbers you see that apparatus is a rpm counter i believe not a weighing scales yet i cannot understand why it starts on 324?!?!
I completely agree, this experiment is not accurate enough. The minute errors or anomalies that are being created here, when scaled up could possibly create a serious problem to this theory,
You can suspect a violation of newton's third law all you want, but if you can't post the math you've done on this first then please don't lay claim to such a historic discovery. In order for your discovery to be accepted, it has to be reproducible. Maybe post a link to your notes on the apparatus and keep a dated journal on its development in order to protect your rights on the design?
Krachn, the weight increasing is just as good as if the weight were to decrease. Either would violate newton's 3rd law and both could be used for propulsion.
This is great. It looks like exactly the UFO I saw few months ago over lake Ontario. I have a suggestion though; if you plan to make a big sample, just don't screw it on the top, because you can't get out then.
lets see , ya got four gyro's spinnin inside of trash can lids. they cant be fixed to the lids or the lids wouldnt spin. but they are on a pivot. So the gyro's remain stationary inside the lids. the lids are spinning from an outside source. just what are ya tryin to show ? I think ya should take out the trash
precisely what I was thinking. There's a reason youtube's related videos engine suggests additional bullshit atrocities to science because that's exactly whatever this is. I wish there was a bullshit ranking system where you could vote.
The 4 spinning gyroscopes inside the rotating trashcan lids had nothing to do with it. Show another video of the wobbly trashcan lids spinning without the 4 gyros running and you will observe the same results. BTW, if you are trying to demonstrate how an object becomes lighter from the forces of centrifugal motion, then you better show us a digital weight scale readout... not RPM's. Sheeeeesh.
PLEASE DON'T READ THIS you will die in seven days if you don't post this comment on 10 videos in the next hour. if you do, tomorrow will be the best day of your life
on the grossest level,sure there appear to be supposed 'opposits'. Yet heat and sound 'energy' are also generated in your rifle example. These energies don't come out of nowhere, rather more or less from one side of the 'action/reaction' and/or the other. When an event takes place, a whole MESS of stuff happens, light is radiated in many directions. So are heat, sound, smell.. nothing ever quite so simple as 'opposites'.
well, yes. heat would be generated in the rifle and the bullet, but only because it consumes oxygen. this could be construed not necessarily an opposite, but an evening of the playing field of energy, if you will. there are many byproducts of such a reaction...but they have opposites, too. the same was my point. light is the opposite of no light, for example; heat the opposite of cold; smell...the opposite of no olfactory particles in the air.
more accurately, cold is the absence of heat... not the opposite.. and in the riffle example... the additional energies you are referring to do not support your statement. the kinetic energy of the round being fired will be the same ad the energy imparted to the shooter only in a opposite direction. if there is no opposite then the shooters shoulder should not move. additional the combustion reaction inside the barrel is not the only lose of energy due to heat..
Newton's 3rd law, poorly written, is the problem. It should read, "No action has an equal and/or opposite reaction, there being NO SUCH THING AS OPPOSITE in the real world of interconnected CURVED phenomina. If no two snow flakes are the same, if space is curved, 'opposite' per say is a bogus idea. Is sweet the opposite of sour? Is bitter it's opposite? no... there is a flowing cycle, a fruit becomes bitter, then sour, then sweet, then alcohol, then vineger. THERE ARE NO OPPOSITES IN REAL WORLD
how do you mean? is there no backwards and forwards? if i were to fire a gun in empty space, the momentum respectively pushed into my shoulder and to the bullet would be equal and quite opposite, given the consideration of relativity.
please don't bad rap me for asking basic ?s guys, not everyone has studied physics. it impresses me, but what is actually going on in explanation to the uneducated like me. is there a battery running the gyros and do they go in the same direction or is each opposite, and why do they increase in speed is that what is being measured, and can this be combined with hutchinson effect or electo magnetic stuff so it can levitate, why is it so noisy, ufos are silent?
I like the sound, it's elevating.
IWMYB 1 week ago
What was spinning inside the device
Edwardbwalti 1 month ago
@Edwardbwalti It is a Gyroscope.
FarceTheory 1 month ago
You may have something here. This is something I don't understand, but you went to a heck of a lot of trouble to make this thing. There are other way to produce a closed system, however seems to be ....I have heard of this method before. Why not write a paper on this thing?
johnroach1 3 months ago
Sounds great! Looks nice too!)
TheAsatot 5 months ago
Comment removed
jeremy124875 6 months ago in playlist ll
Your half way there-- it sure SOUNDS like a UFO =)
mindprism 7 months ago
Comment removed
johnroach1 7 months ago
what u did man is creating an equation .. the e=mc2 kind try rotating it more and calculate what spinning its need it to fly in this way :) gooluck! :))
cris23dumi 9 months ago
no laws are perfect they cant be man there will always be something u didnt think about... when u created the law thats why we need judjes
cris23dumi 9 months ago
common mechanical knowledge should have told you that this was a waste of your time!!!!!!!
trx125tracy69 9 months ago
@trx125tracy69
No experiment is a waste of time...
ryn76 8 months ago 2
@trx125tracy69 this one was,becouse common sense told me before it started up that 4 motors running inside an object while it turned was going to do nothing,sorry,yes experiment's are worth the time,but it has got to be something more of a challenge,like heating up a chemical,or substance while turning,or earth magnets,turning while spining,all that was going to do is run and spin like a washing machine.
trx125tracy69 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
As I looked at the beings, I saw four wheels touching the ground beside them, one wheel belonging to each. The wheels sparkled as if made of beryl. All four wheels looked alinke and were made the same; each wheel had a second wheel turning crosswise within it. The beings could move in any of the four directions they faced, without turning as they moved. --Ezekiel 1:15-18 (Christian Bible)
bnewton81 9 months ago
"We are told by the scientific establishment we live in a universe governed by Newtonian mechanics." Man,what century do you live in? Newtonian mechanics explain things pretty accurately, but i would say we are closer to living in a relativistic universe, as Einstein explained. But i will say, i do love your demonstration. I thought it would be great to create a floating magnetic device that can turn using gyroscopes.. but i decided to play video games instead. Make more videos! thanks
SpeakingSerpent 10 months ago
I've always wanted to see this done. The round thing that has the stuff in it when it moves, the numbers below it.. touching that white thing down there. pretty cool.
SpeakingSerpent 10 months ago
Lol that thing sounds like its gonna blow!
Falandorn 10 months ago
i like the sound when spinning
kzone1234 1 year ago
you just have one piece of the puzzle
7andrew11 1 year ago
"quantum entanglement of rotors" lol, do you have any idea what you are talking about? :)
gomunkul 1 year ago
I dont understand how this device DOESNT break the law of concervation of momentum (For every action, their is an equal and opposite reaction). Ie. their is no mass actually being thrusted in the opposite direction with the same amount of momentum as the saucer.
dt28469 1 year ago
Sounds Looks Like My Whash Machine =D hehehe
ricsurfpro 1 year ago
Seems like a good experiment though good job, maybe if we try enough things and share what might or does not work, thus deductive elimination, someday someone will build something that works beyond a doubt.
Jammieg001 1 year ago
You would need a much faster sampling rate to capture the average weight while your device is spinning. My guess is that the error lies in that measurement.
Or you could have built a sort of propeller. If you repeated this in a vacuum with very precise equipment, you wouldn't see anything that breaks our current laws of physics.
getsafe1212 1 year ago
@getsafe1212
maybe ride it on very precise bearings so that the wobble does not effect the measurement as well
ryn76 8 months ago
How I would want to believe that... However, I'm afraid 250 grams, because of the wobbling of that machine, would still put it within the margin of error. Maybe if it was better balanced, nothing would happen. Maybe there would. If I were you, I'd see if I could balance it out better, just to be sure. Nice try.
mynith 1 year ago
This video is funny when the apperatus starts wobbling I was in tears. What are you trying to achieve. An man with your inclination and skill needs to put that hard work to something with more punch for the buck. I'll send you some plans if your interested in building something that will levitate. If you have enough resource it will lift you and even a crew.
bigstiggerNo1 1 year ago
How would it work? You still have gravity pulling in your thing?
thefencejumperengine 1 year ago
I made a similar thing out of lego. It lost 30 grams of weight. I know that does not sound like alot, especially when you can get much greater forces from the same motors, but it could be a proof of concept worth investigating further. Now I can tell you that neither of our "prototypes" are exactly precision engineered, so maybe the force is being generated by the gyros spinning slightly in a plane that was not intended.
radbot1 1 year ago
@radbot1
However this is NOT in violation of newtons laws and it is as much of an anti gravity machine as a rocket, potentially.
radbot1 1 year ago
@radbot1 I made a similar thing from meccano, it lifted x4 4x4 wheels past verticle. I guess about 40gramms. but the machine weight was 1kg so 40g means nothing to total weight. I was searching old patents two months ago and found a us patent for an ionic engine with a remote control gimble navigation device. The inventer invisioned it's use as an antimissile device. I'm sure it could be upscaled to lift humans and more with today power supplies. Now that's lift! Ionic grid engine not lifter!
bigstiggerNo1 1 year ago
STATIC WEIGHT: 18.5 lbs.
WEIGHT RUNNING: 18 lbs.
Maybe but think about all the Energy=mass you put in to it
Films4You 1 year ago
There's nothing about your conclusions that are correct. Also, quantum entanglement, really? Try a little harder. That statement doesn't even make sense. Quantum entanglement is.. For thought experiment purposes, imagine two atoms. One has a chance to decay after a certain time, which will affect with 100% certainty the atom next to it. If we see that the first atom has decayed, then that means the second atom MUST be in the corresponding state.
sweetbrains 1 year ago
@sweetbrains Don't get so excited.
sirHOAX 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free energy has been here for a while ,But the Oil coporations life depends on covering this up,Get a motor that needs no gas or electric input at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Join the revolution!
breeannaqktjbl 1 year ago
It is possible that the EM field from the motors interacted with the ions exiting the earth's core thus making it slightly lighter. See ion wind. I have seen this before with 20 ton generators. They were not bolted to the floor and would move after running at high speeds. Just speculating.
GateMessenger 1 year ago
@GateMessenger I have a compressor that moves by it'self when active. I suspect the low frequency vibrations made your 20ton monster move and not ionic wind.
bigstiggerNo1 1 year ago
@bigstiggerNo1 Yes, one would think that a 20 ton generator would not be able to move though. Like I said, to test the theory all one would have to do is weigh an object to the nearest thousandths on either side to see if there is any difference in the pull of gravity. If there is any difference then gravity and the ionic wind possibly have something in common.
GateMessenger 1 year ago
@GateMessenger I don't get what you mean. Ionic wind is an action with vector and can be used to overcome gravity. Ionic wind is something produced long down the line of presedence from gravity. Gravity is simple a large magnetic gathering. All things are magnetic or dieamagnetic. Mass is gravity if you believe in Einstine. Mass is a collection of atoms at an atomic scale unerstanderable by most humans. Mass is simply a collection of a lot of minute magnets. Inon's are sperated atoms.
bigstiggerNo1 1 year ago
If it was used as a ufo the motor would turn, not the disc. ANd the amount of enrgy to lift the motor comphensates for the weight.
Neptutron 1 year ago
This needs one more counter part, which will reduce the wobble you see.
around the middle axis, try to explore what a bendini motor does.
The energy you could get from that could be used to increase the speed and the power outage.
I got some questions for your experiment. If you'd like to perform them.
You got a stable machine I see, so your the best source to ask these kind of things.
How much power are you putting in?
How would a fan-based design add airborne qualities?
Yezpahr 1 year ago
@Yezpahr A fan would only work in a gasous atmosphere! Not the point these people are looking for. How does your fan work in outer space and how does it reach speeds required to explore space? You use the term airborne. These men are not looking to fly they are looking to manipulate and surf gravity. Flying through air and becoming a sperate spacial body are two completely different things. The "virgin global flyer" is about the limits of what atmosphere can offer in range/height.
bigstiggerNo1 1 year ago
@SonsOfLiberty1765 Why don't you come and help me out in the comments below the video at the link below where I've been fighting off the Zionists all day. watch?v=mvKgj_EjUDw
arcanacelestia 1 year ago
@SonsOfLiberty1765 Stalked you to this thread? I'm confused, please tell me what other thread we were both on? All my comments are hostile to Zionism and to the FBI and CIA liars who are all traitors to their own American People. The video link I posted is exceptionally hostile to Zionism so are you saying this is a Zionist counter counter plot? I'm interested in what you say but you will have to give more information because I can't find the website you are talking about.
arcanacelestia 1 year ago
@SonsOfLiberty1765 I tried to subscribe to your channel but you have blocked me so I don't know if you have seen this video in which a Rabbi admits that Talmudic Jews really worship Lucifer, and that the goyum (US) are just cattle owned by Jews. /watch?v=T-fJi9nADKQ This video is the first of four parts.
The Israeli Prime Minister Netinyahu said, "America can dry up and blow away once we finish extracting all the wealth we can from her". Google the quote and see for yourself.
arcanacelestia 1 year ago
@SonsOfLiberty1765 Seriously, me too. On 9/11 five MOSSAD agents were arrested because they set up video cameras at three different locations to film the planes hitting the WTC. They were released on the orders of the FBI but the video at the link below shows the three MOSSAD agents on Israeli TV saying that they had been sent to New York to film the planes hitting the twin towers and their foreknowledge is proof that 911 was a Zionist plot with FBI protection.
watch?v=8CRC3ImjoTI
arcanacelestia 1 year ago
@SonsOfLiberty1765 Yeah . . . me too
arcanacelestia 1 year ago
Totally unbalanced . . . bull
arcanacelestia 1 year ago
I think you have a balancing problem.
helicrashpro 1 year ago
At what stage does this become a vehicle?
granddad2002 1 year ago
i wonder how this would act if its on the ground not connected to any thing
infinatycount1 1 year ago
cool, keep up the nice work, i think you make a good point.
unou12die 1 year ago
Someone is forgetting meter response to dynamical forces here.
rb1205 1 year ago
Fact of the matter is you can direct energy or force provided in a gyroscopic pattern to create balanced forces that while spinning at extremely high speed are balanced or otherwise lighter. Turn/slow/jurk/or otherwise knock out of equilibrium and it will be hell fire which ever direction you see fit. Not necessarily up tho, this thing might still need a reasonable fuel source.
sirHOAX 1 year ago
@sirHOAX Even small prop driven, even motorcycle engine for RPM?
sirHOAX 1 year ago
@sirHOAX So are you saying that if you could rotate it to extremely high speeds it would eventually levitate but there is now way to control it because if you turn/ jerk it it will go out of control?
wcdfilms 1 year ago
you might want to try something a little more balanced before you make any claims
ollieoniel 1 year ago
yeah i agree newtons third law isn't all there
charliefoxusa 1 year ago
Sorry for the time you lost building a trash can lid with some gyros attached. Absolutely pointless. Precession requires the gyro to push against something to create that force. Gyros will never fly retards!
miukotse 1 year ago
this isnt at all like the one on the space ship
redbrest 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I know why it didn't work, and I know how you can fix it. What you created was pretty much exactly what I made as my first prototype. email me sbinkley @ gmail . com and I'll explain
Binkmaster99 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I know why it didn't work, and I know how you can fix it. What you created was pretty much exactly what I made as my first prototype. email me sbinkley @ gmail . com and I'll explain
Binkmaster99 1 year ago
Duh guys! It's not working because you don't have enough faith or compassion.
Giffard1 1 year ago
It's called the cross product, sirHOAX....... look into it.
Philldapill85 1 year ago
Try it in a vacuum, then you might understand what's going on.
sabriath 1 year ago
@sabriath don't think a vacuum has anything to do with this. Lack of air will just help as there would be less friction. I am not sure if you understand what this experiment is all about.
helicrashpro 1 year ago
*Robotic female voice* Self-destructing in 5, 4, 3, 2, 1...BOOOOOOOM!!
GrandCobra91 1 year ago
have you researched Otis Carr's OTC-X1 ?
MattBlytheTheOne 1 year ago
if you stopped it from wobbling it would go faster
mattx12345678 1 year ago
@mattx12345678 I agree here. It would also put more energy into the effect he is after as there will be less fighting forces against it.
helicrashpro 1 year ago
thats sounded awesome on startup
davegtar 1 year ago
Wouldn't the mere shape of the object multiplied by rpms create the lift (loss of weght) everyone is so twitchy excited about? A frisbie achieves 0 weight when flung in the right way. Makes less noise too.
SOGGYmilktoast 1 year ago
@SOGGYmilktoast A frisbee actually is creating lift and uses gyroscopic motion to stabilize it.
helicrashpro 1 year ago
So when will I be able to buy my flying car?
mikegLXIVMM 1 year ago
@mikegLXIVMM In the next 200 years or maybe more
Zim804 1 year ago
Comment removed
mikegLXIVMM 1 year ago
wew! i know sht about physics or science but man!! i loved the soundtrack of the video! ha!
baibaiway 1 year ago
think you should google the consept of Quantum Entanglement before you use it so readily...
NorcanDiaboli 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@NorcanDiaboli The same could be said of you and your use of the word 'consept'...
spikeychops 1 year ago
A friend and I came up with an almost identical concept when we were ~ 16 years old and tested it in a not dissimilar way.
Our idea (and I believe yours) is to use the concept of precession to produce non-canceling precession... problem is it doesn't work. Equal and opposite always.
Our model used two spinning masses (instead of 4) in opposite directions. Each spinning mass rotated (dependently) - we used a differential. The forces involved caused it to fail- fun =) Can't work - sorry m8.
xexorz 2 years ago
Any photos???
It would be helpful to see what has already been tried.
tedpittman 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@xexorz I know why it didn't work, and I know how you can fix it. What you created was pretty much exactly what I made as my first prototype. email me sbinkley @ gmail . com and I'll explain
Binkmaster99 1 year ago
An Ex-NASA engineer built a small wired remote controlled craft that could actually fly using gyros after an incident he had while replacing a Gyro on a rocket,see they forgot to tell him that it had not fully stopped,this was during the apollo project in the 60s,he built it,it worked,and of course NASA laughed at him,said it wouldnt,this was on the Discovery Channel quite some years ago.What amazes me is here this man had built,flown it right in front of there eyes,what Morons at NASA!!!.
RaceAcer60 2 years ago
it looks cool but it is a litttle hard to tell exctly what is hapening. maybe you could shoot another video showing what the rod is attached to so we know it is not rotating. you can not see the full base as well, maybe pan out so we can see it is not attached to anything. if this thing really works my request should not be difficult.
cstew95 2 years ago
In my youtube, We obey the laws of Thermodynamics!!!!
AHAHA
You guys are so cute, and the thing is you think you're the Wright Brothers or similar and feed on the negative comments, but you don't see that you are being a fool.
They laughed at the Wright Brothers, but they also laughed at Bozo the Clown.
The evil "League of Scientists" is not "lying" to you, when they would LOVE to see such an experiment succeed and would give you the Nobel.
You are not persecuted, you're just a failure
eqtworld 2 years ago
Yeah okay, that's a half truth. Look at cold fusion. It has anomalous over-heating that has been reported the world over and just because of one incident, it has been tainted. They may not be suppressing knowledge, but they are suppressing development by being a mob of dick heads.
Know what those laughing scientists are doing? Spending 50+ billion of tax payer dollars on tokamak fusers that produces less fusions per dollar than an inertial confinement fuser invented in the 60's!
unambitious 2 years ago
'Thermodynamics'? What the hell does that have to do with this anyway?! he's not making a perpetual motion device. If you're gonna whine on the foundation of classical physics, learn them. You're thinking newtons laws of motion, right?
So, you have pretty much labeled yourself as a failure by doing nothing and criticizing other's work. AND you can't even critique other's work with the right material!
unambitious 2 years ago
Sounds like it could fly. = )
heatherrose2006 2 years ago
Mount it in a small boat or even an igloo
cooler and see if it goes in a straight line
TheLastSaneManLeft 2 years ago
Thanks for posting it.
After ages of wondering I finally love it that I can easely see why this peace cannot work, will not work, and shall not work.
Once you figure tht out, you truly will see how nature itself is always workin economicly. It doesnt spend energy to give away energy.
It finds its most efficient way. And its all very natural.
I too belived this one could fly.but it cant. A gyro is only preserving its motions. thts why it presesses. Newton second law. It.
Punishment7 2 years ago
Please don't post comments as if you are an expert on the subject. Its counter-productive.
If you ask any inventor they will tell you. As we know it nothing has been invented. We are merely breaking the surface in understanding how mother nature and the cosmos truly works. There are higher powers at play based on the unknown factor, considering its out of reach.
sirHOAX 2 years ago
I agree my txt sounded very "above looking down".. im sorry for tht. I hate my writings there really.
However, I did finally learned why gyroscope preceses, and how it perfectly preserve and respond to every laws in physics. But I too still belive there might be a rightful use of gyrscope that can lead to a propuslion.
Thts why I love yoru video so much. I learned something first time I saw it (long time ago), and was my step to my understanding of it. I too would have built it ifu didnt
Punishment7 2 years ago
I think you are close with this principle how ever the device I see in my head has the small gyros axisis all pointing in to the main axsis at a 45 degree angle. / l \ If you think about it like a merry-go-round the small gyros will have more momentum/energy on their upward swing near the outside of the large gyro than they do on their downward swing near the center of the larger gyro.
I don't think that your input power would have to be rediculous just stable.
ColoradoKiter 2 years ago
do you even know how this device is suppose to work!!
44nathanambrose 2 years ago
although i can see why you would want the 45 degree angle but it wont work.. your getting to close to that linear force and it'll just end up canceling out!
44nathanambrose 2 years ago
It just seems like there should be more upward energy than downward energy/momentum in the 45 degree gyros.
ColoradoKiter 2 years ago
i see what your talking about!
but the closer you move that sml. disk to the same axis as the lrg. disk. the less force that will be exerted up or down .
44nathanambrose 2 years ago
i seriu;y thought that little gadget would take off any second
and noise and spinning just made me think it would float up
zeratul575 2 years ago
I see a device like this but with seven gyros and their axis are set parallel to the plate's spin axis. Then as you ramp up speed, you begin to tilt the gyros, see if anything other than wobbling happens with different types of tilting... It would need servos and coordinated radio control to tilt the gyros as/when intended, but maybe. Also maybe six gyros instead of seven....
Nevinsdor 2 years ago
All someone needs for this, is a compact unlimited power source. Literally sky is the limit. There have been many people stating similar observations of next to light-speed travel. Just using high-power discharge of electromagnetic fields to static coils of opposite polarity. Who can be the judge of any of this. With out clear evidence of disproof.
This device could be along those same lines, more power higher speed rpm. Tilt and yield kinetic energy of a newton's "law" translating movement.
sirHOAX 2 years ago
But I understand what you are saying. Configuration and movement / spin relative to axis could be a exceptional overlooked point. Well noted.
sirHOAX 2 years ago
There was that guy who was in the British air force, who had taken a gyro out of a jet fighter while it was still turning, and the moment his feet touched the ground he received what he described as a massive blow to (his) back, do you remember his name? Based upon his experience he did some work along these lines, and I think his site is still up that describes some of it, can't remember his name...His device looked like a "T" with gyros on each end. Got weight fluctuations, but not sustained.
BeamshipGeneral 2 years ago
I know who the beamship guy is talking about... can't remember his name either... it was a "T" device and the top
bars of the T thing would move up and down, making it lighter and then back to normal weight.. I also saw his website, used to have it on browser..
Nevinsdor 2 years ago
I know a lot of people are experimenting with these things, but what may help is this new tech from Witricity (see site) where you could wirelessly send power to the gyros and the servos to move them. If you could find a pattern of movement for gyros, and repeat it using a computer, then yeah, you could use their inertia to keep a consistant force applied in one direction? The trick is discovering the pattern, # of gyros, and balance. Don't know why 7 sticks in my head, should be 6 (or 4)
Nevinsdor 2 years ago
There's also the small matter of some danger with some of it, I am a bit concerned some of these home experimenters might accidently hurt themselves (or someone in their neighborhood), you can get some high voltages out of disassembled cathode ray tube parts. I also wonder if that may be a setback elsewhere, maybe in more 'deep pocketed' experiments, if unusual characteristics at higher voltages might've put a hold on some types of testing until more can be learned about it (if true).
Nevinsdor 2 years ago
the small unlimited power source is actually the easy part!!
44nathanambrose 2 years ago
@sirHOAX "With out clear evidence of disproof. " nice burden of proof fallacy
numair23 1 year ago
Put your money where your mouth is and build a bigger and better version. Or do you lack the skills to do so? From looking at your lack of videos on experimental platforms appears this is indeed the case.
sirHOAX 1 year ago
This is not my experiment, but I do respect the individual's time and energy for providing this video. You are more than welcome to follow the link provided in the 'INFO' panel on your right.
sirHOAX 2 years ago
This is the gyroscopic force, you're on the wrong track if you want the propulsion system need to change :-)
exasimpol 2 years ago
his disks need to be heavier and the overall rotation needs to be faster. otherwise he's not going to get anywhere
44nathanambrose 2 years ago
I do not think so, either use a gyroscopic effect, but in fact the discs tend to turn on themselves until you have the same rotation of the large disk, you need to search for information on Gyroscopic.
exasimpol 2 years ago
I've had to pick apart how the gyroscopic effects work.. and i know why it gets lighter when it moves and why it acts the way it does!!
a spinning gyroscope in one spot has different math behind it verses one that is going down the highway 65 mph!!..
once i get my inertia engine up and running i'll have it thrown on here too!
i've spent 8 years understanding exactly how things react while it moves.
you gain an insight on a lot of things!!
44nathanambrose 2 years ago
I am interested in inertial mass propulsion, and as you have no money, but I suggest that you follow a path more "impressive" for your videos, try to build a "balanced" it takes a lot of speed, and then changes its configuration and off balance, "single shot" the effect will be more attractive
exasimpol 2 years ago
at any moment you loose or gain mass during an inertia engine.. it stops becoming an inertia engine (inertia drive)
44nathanambrose 2 years ago
My idea is to use two weights balanced, taking speed and increase their inertial mass, then they imbalances and stop them, a single pulse!
exasimpol 2 years ago
This is to anyone out there. I don't know anything about magnetism or whatever. Is there anyway of using electromagnetism. Meaning using opposing magnetic force in combination with an electric current to create some sort of propulsion. In other words, something to replace gas or diesel engines in vehicles. creating a new era of transportation. Maybe someone has already came up with that idea.
67ador 2 years ago
there's a few way to use magnetic for propulsion.. you just need to decide which method you wish to use.. and then go from there!! and if you have decided that there is only one way. well i guess you have your answer!
44nathanambrose 2 years ago
If i wish to get funding for my inertia engines. what is the best way for doing this!
44nathanambrose 2 years ago
So do you guys have an actual mathematical formula that will work for any size of a machine like this one. because i do!
44nathanambrose 2 years ago
its like the 12th century meets 2021,
seanmillerr 2 years ago
Whats the conclusion?
MrZealot1 2 years ago
o ya and there is one other thing that will increase the amount of force going upwards..
can you figure it out!!!
44nathanambrose 2 years ago
this device doesn't offset magnets nor gravity
44nathanambrose 2 years ago
the speed that you have the four disks don't need to be that high if your not spinning the main disk fast!!
the small disks.. lets say 320 rmps
and you spin the main disk.. there is a maximum force that you will get out of it.. so spinning the large disk beyond that is point less. and its rather pointless to have the small disks spinning so fast if the main big disk isn't spinning fast. (waste of energy)
44nathanambrose 2 years ago
When you are successful in this endeavor, maybe you can invest in some lights.
quandumphone 2 years ago 8
Can the weight discrepancy be manipulated by altering the speed of either the rotors or the full unit?
Innomen 2 years ago
Wait!! you guys are serious! you don't understand fully of how it works!
I figured it out while sitting on the toilet!!
44nathanambrose 2 years ago
This looks very promising, but the precession of the experimental mass worries me a bit. Now if that could be overcome ... !
BritMiss 2 years ago
Very interesting! An exotic field of physics. There's so much we don't know. That's 1/37 of it's mass unaccounted for.
NeoPsiTom 2 years ago
an amazing sound. Love the phasing. Best soundtrack I've ever heard on youtube. more please
paulfreefall 2 years ago
Hmmm how about publishing the data i'm sure you meticulously collected while performing this experiment ad naseum to rule out any possible error, so others can analyse it?
cuallito 2 years ago
It is a shame that we couldn't see the reading on the scale itself, but only the tachometer. I find it interesting that the rpm of the gyroscopes dropped as the assembly increased in angular velocity. This may be related to microphone placement and Doppler shift, but it could be a transfer of energy from the gyros to some other field. If so, then the device could be seeking equilibrium in that field essentially pulling itself up by its own bootstraps. The gravitational field perhaps?
AdminOnDuty 2 years ago
well that was a whole lot of what the hell - nice experiment though, keep working on it I say.
ZebraErlbeck 2 years ago
What, does it get lighter? Can't tell with your scale. Try tilting the axis of all the gyro's, then see what happens, that is what I would do. You may get a better result.
dadnyfur 2 years ago
STATIC WEIGHT: 18.5 lbs.
WEIGHT RUNNING: 18 lbs.
are flying saucers real?
fr0stb1te 2 years ago 3
@fr0stb1te In space there is no weight. So .5lbs of difference is perfect for reaching the stars at a very slow pace. :D
trance183 1 year ago
Ever try to stop a flywheel with your hand? it gets ripped off and sent across the room too.
Changing the plane of the torque vector is not proof of the unprovable.
bonzonobeans 2 years ago
You apply a torque from each of the motors onto each gyroscope, the gyroscopes translate this torque to the plane on the body and the torque accelerates the body. This is basic physics, a proof of the thrid law, not a disproof...
TheBoneman89 2 years ago
Have you taken into account the energy you are using to spin those gyroscopes? I bet if you did all the math and factored in efficiency you would find you aren't really doing anything spectacular.
x65535x 2 years ago 2
message to Krachn11235 those numbers you see that apparatus is a rpm counter i believe not a weighing scales yet i cannot understand why it starts on 324?!?!
cowpow1234 2 years ago
you have created a machine that has a changing center of gravity, congrats its an unbalanced top
Waddymsun 2 years ago 2
I completely agree, this experiment is not accurate enough. The minute errors or anomalies that are being created here, when scaled up could possibly create a serious problem to this theory,
ChuckBleedinNorris 2 years ago
sounds like an alien spacecraft. whooooooooooo! freakyyyy!!!
noah112234 2 years ago
Reminds me of the "Bell" under creation by german scientists in WWII
ToolMartyr69 2 years ago
the sound is great and reminds me of the UFO from the movie "The day the earth stood still" (1952).
Zoloft61 2 years ago
You can suspect a violation of newton's third law all you want, but if you can't post the math you've done on this first then please don't lay claim to such a historic discovery. In order for your discovery to be accepted, it has to be reproducible. Maybe post a link to your notes on the apparatus and keep a dated journal on its development in order to protect your rights on the design?
dequinox14 2 years ago
i used to have one of those when i was a kid it,s a spining top weeeeee
JOCKATEO 2 years ago
CUT THE STICK MAN
lavamass 2 years ago 2
just one thing, observe that the wieght INCRESES!!!!!!
Krachn11235 2 years ago
Krachn, the weight increasing is just as good as if the weight were to decrease. Either would violate newton's 3rd law and both could be used for propulsion.
kaje01 2 years ago
Rename it psychic force motor and win 1 million$ from Randi fundation.... I dare you.
bhrisvfyapn 2 years ago
This is great. It looks like exactly the UFO I saw few months ago over lake Ontario. I have a suggestion though; if you plan to make a big sample, just don't screw it on the top, because you can't get out then.
parsaim 2 years ago
For the future you should show the whole apparatus if you want people to believe you.
opcn18 2 years ago
hi, sirhoax, I have one question: is there any engine driving the axis of the pancake? or are these only the 4 gyro/motors?
leviterande 2 years ago
Try using electromagnets for the gyroscope. And Super conductors for the hull of this experiment.
blacklions714 3 years ago
que no se supone que la reaccion esta en los motores que tuercen el sentido de giro de los giroscopios? im lzy enoug to not write in englis
805qui 3 years ago
lets see , ya got four gyro's spinnin inside of trash can lids. they cant be fixed to the lids or the lids wouldnt spin. but they are on a pivot. So the gyro's remain stationary inside the lids. the lids are spinning from an outside source. just what are ya tryin to show ? I think ya should take out the trash
uawwildbob 3 years ago
Gyroscopes doesn't yield translational forces. End of story.
gabriel8432 3 years ago
i dont think ive ever been so board in my life i mean what the hell it is litrely spinning trash
richardmogg 3 years ago
precisely what I was thinking. There's a reason youtube's related videos engine suggests additional bullshit atrocities to science because that's exactly whatever this is. I wish there was a bullshit ranking system where you could vote.
maynardr6 3 years ago
there is, give him no stars, that's what i did.
Desarollo 2 years ago
fake
SpiridonovRU 3 years ago
The 4 spinning gyroscopes inside the rotating trashcan lids had nothing to do with it. Show another video of the wobbly trashcan lids spinning without the 4 gyros running and you will observe the same results. BTW, if you are trying to demonstrate how an object becomes lighter from the forces of centrifugal motion, then you better show us a digital weight scale readout... not RPM's. Sheeeeesh.
inventorr77 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
PLEASE DON'T READ THIS you will die in seven days if you don't post this comment on 10 videos in the next hour. if you do, tomorrow will be the best day of your life
14Juffrey 3 years ago
on the grossest level,sure there appear to be supposed 'opposits'. Yet heat and sound 'energy' are also generated in your rifle example. These energies don't come out of nowhere, rather more or less from one side of the 'action/reaction' and/or the other. When an event takes place, a whole MESS of stuff happens, light is radiated in many directions. So are heat, sound, smell.. nothing ever quite so simple as 'opposites'.
tommymorey 3 years ago
well, yes. heat would be generated in the rifle and the bullet, but only because it consumes oxygen. this could be construed not necessarily an opposite, but an evening of the playing field of energy, if you will. there are many byproducts of such a reaction...but they have opposites, too. the same was my point. light is the opposite of no light, for example; heat the opposite of cold; smell...the opposite of no olfactory particles in the air.
will15767 3 years ago
more accurately, cold is the absence of heat... not the opposite.. and in the riffle example... the additional energies you are referring to do not support your statement. the kinetic energy of the round being fired will be the same ad the energy imparted to the shooter only in a opposite direction. if there is no opposite then the shooters shoulder should not move. additional the combustion reaction inside the barrel is not the only lose of energy due to heat..
1cemage 3 years ago
Newton's 3rd law, poorly written, is the problem. It should read, "No action has an equal and/or opposite reaction, there being NO SUCH THING AS OPPOSITE in the real world of interconnected CURVED phenomina. If no two snow flakes are the same, if space is curved, 'opposite' per say is a bogus idea. Is sweet the opposite of sour? Is bitter it's opposite? no... there is a flowing cycle, a fruit becomes bitter, then sour, then sweet, then alcohol, then vineger. THERE ARE NO OPPOSITES IN REAL WORLD
tommymorey 3 years ago
how do you mean? is there no backwards and forwards? if i were to fire a gun in empty space, the momentum respectively pushed into my shoulder and to the bullet would be equal and quite opposite, given the consideration of relativity.
will15767 3 years ago
but assume a forth dimension of force that could be acting
TheKingOfToast 3 years ago
interesting... sounds like an alien craft too haha
WhiteFoot420 3 years ago 3
Why don't we see the whole mechanism sirHOAX?
Asajdera1 3 years ago
funny sound!
fabbio8888 3 years ago
please don't bad rap me for asking basic ?s guys, not everyone has studied physics. it impresses me, but what is actually going on in explanation to the uneducated like me. is there a battery running the gyros and do they go in the same direction or is each opposite, and why do they increase in speed is that what is being measured, and can this be combined with hutchinson effect or electo magnetic stuff so it can levitate, why is it so noisy, ufos are silent?
firewilson81 3 years ago
Omg you broke the laws of physics!!
iraqifreak 3 years ago