Look up! those are chemtrails masking the real truth. 9/11 was just the seed that has been growing for over 10 years now, resistance to they're matrix is your best weapon , no vaccinations,be careful what you eat,purify your drinking water,eliminate bottled water, never watch main street media news or movies. start putting together a survival bag even if you have to do it a little bit at a time I know some of these items can be expensive Thanks&Peace out
I ban and censor the shit out my comments/websites/forum etc. I make no qualms about it, Jews censor the shit out of us when we put out our info, we sure aren't going to play fair with Jew-trolls
@Prothink2 Non-Jews have no leadership, and if one arises, non-Jews will attack him for the Jews. It's always win-win for Jews because of their cohesion and memory.
By now it is proven that SOPA is traced back to elements within the US government and their Zionist Jew lobbyists in higher NWO positions as a means of national control and future depopulation program, the direct 9/11 connection revealed by neo-con agent/landlord Larry Silverstein is evident in the controlled demolition of WTC 7, the smoking gun.
As a result of NPAA meetings in neo-con headquarter WTC 7, Rothchilds contacted 3000 Jews to stay home on 9/11.
lol wtg rys... how bout ae911truth and the cash cow they have created? Sure put out vids with experts explaining the facts about 9/11... but to turn it into a cash machine like YT user ae911truth... complete with T-shirts for sale etc...Christ they are making Gene Simmons from Kiss look like an amateur salesman... meanwhile in real time a few thousand dead people voted in the republican race last week.. but don't tell that to a truther you will get called a shill... hahahahahahaha
Do some research, shill. 9/11 dates back to the 1970's Zionist affairs.
The Bilderberg group made a deal with Zionist Jew Larry Silverstein to rig the WTC with explosives to eventually destroy traceable evidence of illegal fundings of the new global economy program, tanked by NWO, the Fed and Eurobanks.
Rothchilds opine the US war crimes if kept to/in the NWO kangaroo charade, could acquit many individual Neo-Con Zionist perps, while nullifying the pesky US Constitution.
@Riddlerx333x Hmmm. I see your one of those doh does who has been taken in by the mainstream media containment movement Jesse Ventura, and you like the Govt paid Anonymous zio-shills who want you all to go out and get your asses kicked by occupying places... a go nowhere movement designed by Zionist Gene Sharp and lo and behold the foreigners with bullhorns all over the place directing occupy ppl... man... wanna buy a bridge?
You ought to look up operation northwoods you dumb ass.. thousands of architects, engineers, firefighters have unanswered questions about 9/11 never before has a steel frame building collapsed due to fires.. DON'T LISTEN TO THIS IGNORANT FUCKWAD where is your proof dipshit? you actually believe the official story!!?! even members of the commission report said they were covering for each other.. how about the members of the victims families at the hearings not being told real answers. U SUCK!!!
ZERO TOLERANCE FOR RETARDS???----WELL THERE GOES MOST OF AMERICA......HOW DO YOU LIKE YOUR MUSLIM KING OBAMA??--- AND THERE ARE AMERICANS THAT ARE SRSLY THINKING ABOUT PUTTING HIM IN FOR ANOTHER 4 YEARS.....NDAA ...ALLAH ACKBAR!!!
i dont really know what need to happen for some ppl to believe... for everybody who is interested look for 9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out, Full-length, there is a 2h document, engineers and scientist say why OFFICIAL story doesn't add up, just watch it... i say again ENGINEERS and SCIENTS... and they tell why official story is against science or maybe you guys dont believe in laws of physics?!
Edward Current claimed to be the one who faked it just to show how gullible many of the truthers are, and how convince bullshit can be to the ignorant masses.
The official story doesn't add up. Watch Architects and Engineers most recent documentary here: watch 911 Explosive Evidence on my "Imperialism" playlist
The official story doesn't add up. Watch Architects and Engineers most recent documentary here: watch?v=lw-jzCfa4eQ&list=PL40EC1DB99A4A3C57&index=7&feature=plpp_video
The official story doesn't add up. Watch Architects and Engineers most recent documentary here: watch?v=lw-jzCfa4eQ&list=PL40EC1DB99A4A3C57&index=7&feature=plpp_video
go look at the B52 that crashed into empire state building google it. one plane (made of steel) one building made of older concrete no downed building. jet engine fuel must be airborne in order to burn an intial explosion would have been expected but to burn for so long is absolutely proposturous. go look up a few plane crashes and tell me if it makes any sense there are videos on you tube of the F 15 that flew into the side of wtc7 on the other side of THIS building.
@dialectical44 no it was not... Try looking at the video of the collapse again and watch the side of the building that is in the smoke. That side of the building actually collapsed 8 seconds before the rest of the building. That is an asymmetrical collapse... You do not get that with a controlled demolition unless some one seriously messes it up.
@dialectical44 By the way... how do you propose they managed to both plant thousands of demolition charges in the towers (which would have taken over a week to do) in an active office building undetected, and some how manage to prevent any of the charges from detonating prematurely inside buildings from completely uncontrolled office fires? Even if they could do these things... They cannot account for how the fire damage would change the structural integrity in their placement planning...
I love how the first "eye witness" states quite specifically "There was an explosion beneath me" and yet if there really was an explosion which he could actually see happening right under him then it should have killed him. No... He did not witness an explosion. He felt he felt the floor under his feet move suddenly and probably thought it was an explosion but there are thousands of other things that could have caused it... This is the best you have?
@ewingsco Again... those are not explosions. They are the 500,000 cubic feet of air between each floor being forced out of the building as it collapses. In a controlled demolition the explosions occure prior to the collapse not during the collapse.
@ewingsco By the way those "explosions in the lobby" were reffering to the sky lobby below the impact zone. Each floor of the buildings had about half a million cubic feet of air inbetween them. As the building collapses that air is forced out through what ever exit it can find.much of the air was forced out through the windows of the floor but much of it also was forced through the elevator shafts into the sky lobby blowing out several windows of the lobby before the collapse reached it.
@ewingsco Look man... No one SAW any explosions. They heard sounds that they DESCRIBED as explosions but they cannot confirm what the source of the noise was for certain. There are thousands of possible explainations for those sounds. It could have been anything from falling debris crashing into the ground to sounds from the fires echoing down the elevator shafts.
@ewingsco Damn you really are stupid aren't you... 500,000 cubic feet of air inbetween each floor and you can't figure out how it managed to collapse into it's self. It is because most of it's volume is air dumb ass... I love how you retards are so selective as to which of the laws of physics you will pay attention to...
@ewingsco It is very simple... The fall speed of the building was measured based upon the rate at which the roof fell. It was not just the lower potion of the building that was crumbling from the weight of the upper portion crashing down into it. The underside of the upper portion was also crumbling because it was constantly being bombarded by debris from the lower portion. The roof of the building actually fell considerably faster then the rate at which the actual collapsing area did.
@ewingsco hey dumb ass... You just defeated your own argument. Want to know how?
"violent explosive lateral ejections" That is how.
You see explosive demolition charges are extreamely LOUD. They can be heard echoing for miles. In addition to this even though they are very loud they are also quite small. Infact they are generally only poweful enough to destroy the column they are attached to. In other words they wouldn't be powerful enough to cause those ejections any way...
@ewingsco By the way those "explosions" you say that were "clearly visable"... If you had actually read what I have been saying here I allready explaiend this. As the building collapsed the air inside (approximately 500,000 cubic feet of air per floor) was forced out. A lot of it went out through the windows as the floors collapsed but some of it was forced through elevator shafts blowing out windows on the sky lobby below... this air carried out with it crushed cement dust from the debris.
@ewingsco Are you even aware that most truther's abandondoned the explosive demolition theory ages ago? When they were confronted by the issue of explosions being loud enough to damage the hearing of every survivor within a mile of the building they stopped claiming it was an explosive demolition and whent with a more logical theory that it was a demolition using thermite charges... Which are not explosive and instead simply melt the beams... ofcourse this theory has no proof either...
@MrAwsome514 but what is known though(as far as my research has taken me) is that the official story claimed the collapse was due to office fires. but even if that were the case, fire shouldnt have reached tempatures hot enough to melt the steel framing.
@MrAwsome514 but what is known though(as far as my research has taken me) is that the official story claimed the collapse was due to office fires. but even if that were the case, fire shouldnt have reached tempatures hot enough to melt the steel framing.
I must say that I find amusing the words 'discredit the movement'. Eddie did to laugh at the movement, but discredit implies that there exists credit. And that is quite funny.
@zakquack I daresay that you've just written the most comprehensive, succinct, novel and accurate assessment of ever to grace the internet. And you even successfully distinguished 'your' from 'you're'.
Now, moving on from that - precisely what was incorrect in what I said? Oh, oops. Now I see why you wrote what you did.
@integralmath you know what you said... watch?v=lw-jzCfa4eQ None of these people have credibility? Everyone speaking in this video is a PhD or an architect or is an expert in a related field. Many have been given awards for scientific excellence... You realize, for building 7 to collapse the way it did, 400 connections PER SECOND would have to fail?
@zakquack oh, this could be interesting. I cannot tell you how often I read science journals which note that x number of non-experts (architects) and people in related fields (engineer is a broad term) plus 10,000 regular people agree, with over 25,000 years of combined experience agree! If this is a long series of fallacious posturing, I don't know what is. The first one of whom, "if we are to believe that fire brought down". That isn't the claim. Oh boy, this is going to be long.
@integralmath I..... should just smile and back away slowly... I have encountered very intensely insane people on the internet before... it was not fun... this is always how it starts... An excited rambling with no clear breaks between ideas and absolutely no discernable point...
@zakquack an inability on your part to apprehend a point doesn't imply the absence of one on my part. 1.) architects are not experts in controlled demolitions. Lynn Margulis is not an expert on buildings in anyway at all. Her field is genetics, in particularly she determined the symbiotic evolution between mitochondria, and chloroplasts. Yet, she's being interviewed for her opinion? Why? She's no more qualified to opine than I am. My PhD is certainly not inferior to hers; it's just not my field.
@integralmath And the structural engineers? The ex-military personel with demo training? The civic engineers? The fire safety experts? there's a lot of experts... I think they were selected mostly on merit of what they had to say, with the credentials there to verify that these people are not crazy..
@zakquack I'm uncertain what insight having once been in the military and using explosives to blow up things gives one into how structures generally may or may not collapse. In fact, computers have trouble solving these types of problems. So naturally, human 'experience' is a perfectly acceptable gauge. Yes, what about all of these engineers? (continued)
@integralmath You're "uncertain what insight having once been in the military and using explosives..."
So, you're saying if you've been trained to pinpoint weaknesses in steel-reinforced high-rises and use explosives to bring them down and you've executed your training in exercises and then analyzed the results hundreds of times it would give you no insight into the behavior of failing structures? look, i'd rather not continue this argument... i don't know what your agenda is, but i don't like
@zakquack you're free to concede the attempt at an argument anytime you'd like. And what I said, despite your reading skills, was that being trained in planting and detonating explosives gives one no insight whatever into how structures either will or must fail in the absence of explosives. Of course, it doesn't give one particularly meaningful insight into how they must or will collapse in the presence of explosives generally for that matter. But that's irrelevant in this case.
@zakquack communication with you might have failed. This implies nothing whatever about where the failure lies, or whether communication itself even failed. For, as I've noted, your inability to read what is actually written doesn't impinge in the slightest on whether or not communication is taking place. All it determines is how available that communication is to you. No doubt others can perfectly well understand what I've written despite your failure to do so. =^_^=
@integralmath If your boss orders you to hand me something and in the transaction it falls to the ground... Will your boss fire me?
NO. because I don't even work for your boss.
in the communication model, your boss is your desire to communicate an idea. You handing it to me is your attempt to communicate that idea. It falling to the ground is my inability to discern your meaning (which I am not accepting blame for, btw). I added a "'t" to your first comment and it makes a lot more sense,btw
@zakquack again, it's cute that in your 'am a physics expert' mind, this is a logical correlate to a model of communication. But here's an actual correlate of your dim-witted idea: suppose you're looking through a book written in a language you do not understand. From that, you would conclude it's the author's poor writing ability that prevents your understanding what's there, instead of your inability to read that language. Dostoevsky was an ineffective writer because you don't read Cyrillic.
@zakquack why is it that precisely none of them has as of yet submitted for review (that is a step before submitting for publication) a single peer-reviewed paper indicating that they're claims that it is 'impossible' for a steel building to collapse from fire damage alone? You think they were selected on merit of what they say? What someone 'says' isn't evidence of what happened. They needn't be 'crazy' to be simply incorrect.
@integralmath you've spent at least two hours trolling the internet trying to 'win' arguments... So spend two hours to watch explosive evidence. It won't matter if you have an open mind or not...
@zakquack as it happens, I'm capable of watching the video while talking to you. I am uncertain what is with the charge of trolling for a 'win' has to do with anything. Trolling doesn't seem to fit, and there isn't an argument that's been adduced against which a response is necessary. A chain of assertions and fallacious conclusions drawn therefrom doesn't, alas, constitute an argument in any meaningful sense of the word. But make that dramatic flounce if it suits you.
@zakquack it's interesting that the first person to raise the psychological state of those in the video is you. It is not something I've said. Further, it is not 'simply logic' that if communication fails the problem is at the source. In fact, that is merely one possible source of error. There is no logical chain from 'communication failed' to 'therefore the only possible reason is x." Do not pretend to lecture me on logic; you'll only make a fool of yourself.
@zakquack expert you say? Oh my. I have met yet another self-titled expert in a branch of science who demonstrates, oddly enough, a nearly perfect ignorance of how it is that science operates! Sorry, I don't date strangers from the internet. I do appreciate the offer, but I must politely decline so pruriently solicitous a self-invitation as that.
@integralmath It's an art and a science. You wouldn't understand because you can't see passed the tip of your nose. You're pompous and self-important. I think my physics demo would do you a lot of good.
@zakquack yes, yes, the art of physics. Hey, I bet that's why Berkeley grants a BA in physics, and an MA in it too. To emphasize the art that goes into it, of course. Pointing out that you're a faux-expert in science with dodgy reading comprehension doesn't, alas, imply that I'm important, let alone self-important. In fact, only you've brought up that anyone thinks I'm important.
@zakquack well, we know that it won't be in any intellectual or academic way, for that would require either superior knowledge or superior reasoning skills on your part. And I've already declined the invitation to go on a date with you. I am, therefore, at a loss to know in what realm you could be the slightest utility to me.
@zakquack and I must again decline such a romantic overture. Sorry, but like the English major said, it's not you. It's I. As exciting for you as the moment might be, I simply find you lackluster, and am thus not at all excited. And thus not interested in helping you realize your fantasies. But I am tremendously flattered that you've spent so much time and energy thinking about how you'd like to touch me, a mere internet person, in real life. It's flattering, but I must decline.
@zakquack 2.) unqualified authorities in a related field are being interviewed. Their opinions are being taken without a single demonstration of precisely what they adduce is a problem. Buildings can't collapse in that way but for controlled demolition. And certainly not from fire. 3.) the '6 second' or '6.5 second' collapse time used in the popular video is simply, demonstrably false as a measure of the collapse time of the entire structure.
@zakquack at any rate, I'll just iterate the salient point which gave rise to your comment here: poor reading comprehension and the forbearance of analytic thought on your part do not constitute a failure on mine.
@integralmath I appreciate your effort at poking the soft spots... Just watch the video. I don't want you to come to me piece by piece...
You've succeeded in being a pompous asshole... your condescending attitude ain't gonna get you laid. Now, you can neglect the important pieces and continue to point out insignificant shortcomings... Or, you can give a valid argument why I should believe fire could cause coincidences to stack end-to-end... or you can bugger off...
@zakquack I've not asked you to believe anything such as I'm aware of the words I've yet selected. This would be another example of your failing to read what I'm writing. What is more is that whether I get laid or seem condescending have nothing whatever to do with the inability of this video's sequence of personal testimonials-devoid of anything resembling the enterprise of science-to present the slightest reason to think it has the ghost of a point; more fallacious reasoning on your part.
@integralmath the major pieces of evidence in the explosive evidence has to do with the laws violated and the investigations stifled. really, i'm not interested in arguing with you about this. Go to /physicsandreason
You'll find people to argue with there. I've said my piece. I am trying to convince you of your prejudice, but I know that I am failing. It's no use. And you're absolutely not going to be able to sway me because I've given this ten years of thought and earnest research.
@zakquack actually, I think you were trying to convince me that I'm a douche, for that's where you started. My prejudice? I'm aware of it. I am heavily biased in favor of things for which evidence exists, and biased against things for which no evidence exists. Thought and 'earnest research' have no promise of a correct result. But they do tend to give people confidence out of all proportion to their claims in the truth of those claims. It's quite bizarre, but evidently true.
@integralmath please proof-read... you've become more coherent since you engaged me... But your first address really doesn't make sense... I couldn't figure out if you were coming or going... And since the purpose of using a language is to communicate an idea, the fault can't possibly lie within the reciever (simple logic). Your goal was to communicate something and you failed.
@tjohn1986 that is exactly what I thought! The movement discredits the movement. In fact the best word to describe it is "a movement". (that's a poop joke)
It might be helpful if you specified which WTC7 video you're talking about. There is one that I'm not sure of, but I don't know if it's the one you're referring to.
Also, I'm one of the retards who thinks it's very likely that a missle hit the Pentagon.
1. Lagrasse and Brooks and other witnesses who state the path was not as the Official Story (OS) claimed
DON'T LISTEN HAHAHHA THEY HAVE TO BE SHILLS. NOBODY I CAN THINK OF RIGHT OFF IS SO DUMB THEY COULDN'T SEE THE "NOSE OUT" , THE ONLY LIVE FEED ON 911 OF 2ND ALLEGED PLANE. ONLY ONE!! IT GOES THROUGH IT, THEN THEY BLACKEN THE PICTURE OUT. HAHHAH. I'M A MASTER METALLURGIST AND I'M SORRY TO BURST YOUR BUBBLE BUT ALUMINUM STILL WON'T SLICE THROUGH CONCRETE AND STEEL, NOR WILL IT TURN IT ALL TO POWDER. AHHAHAHA THE MEDIA WAS 100% INVOLVED. UNLIKE YOU, I'M THE MASTER OF EVERY SITUATION, YOU'RE NOT
A guy who was a contractor at my job worked in one of the WTC's. He filmed the whole thing from Hoboken Bay on 9/11. There was a big as bomb that went off at the bottom of one of those buildings before the plane hit. TV as we know is bullshit, and yes, some of the shit on the internet is fake too.
The video I saw was RAW footage.
Don't be stupid. The masses are going to figure this one out-one day.
Plenty of RAW VHS footage left around like I saw. VHS tapes can't be faked like digital.....
The movement? What "movement"? 9/11 "Truthers"? That's NOT a movement. lol
It's a childish ideology with nothing substantial behind it. Just because you WANT to believe in conspiracies... doesn't mean that they are any realer than your vivid yet wild imaginations.
Controlled demolitions my ass. You fucktards are some of the most disrespectful morons on the net. You lack a real set of critical thinking faculties and... balls.
Grow up.
And the driver didn't shoot Kennedy either. Fucktards.
9/11 The Third Truth with Dimitri Khalezon is a video worth seeing. 9/11 was still an inside job especially if Vladamir Putin says so. lol I say that because he has Russian Intellegience at his disposal.
Barry Jennings who worked for the NYC something who seemed like a reputable person was stuck in WTC 7 for hours because a bomb went off yet others say there weren't makes it hard who to believe. Why is it that other videos like the 4409 wtc 7 video shows a vertical line of holes exploding out of 7? Is that one fake too?
Odd, because I watched this video on the news on September 1, 2001 and it looks just the same to me today as it did 10 years ago. I wish you were right, but you are wrong. There are very important questions to be asked and answered. Denial and anger are a very natural reaction.
Mental Health Professionals Say that Questioning 9/11 Is the Sane Thing To Do.
Most mental health professionals have concluded that the official version of 9/11 is fraudulent, and that those who BELIEVE the official version suffer from defense mechanisms.
Sociologists have shown that fear causes those people to accept fictitious reports by the media.
The 9/11 Commissioners, Congressional investigators and most of the world do not believe the government’s description of the events on 9/11.
@SuperBigGulps I have a question for you. It's a question specific to WTC7 that I feel is important as the answer has rather significant ramifications. Here it is. Why do you think that the Fire Department gave a final order to abandon the WTC7 building and surrounding area at 2:30 P.M.? (The building collapsed at 5:20:52 P.M.)
In a couple of years the "truthers" will be claiming everything was done with holograms anyway. Who knows what shit they will come up with from one week to another.
@WillShakespeare2007 Computer graphics, Fake planes, Holograms, and Laser beams are not real theory's put forth by the truth movement. They are disinformation theory's invented by paid shills in an attempt to sway people from looking at any legitimate evidence there may or may not be. They get alot of people this way so don't feel bad.
If you want real info on 9/11 go to AE911truth (dot) org or you can also find good info on 9/11blogger (dot) com
@SuperBigGulps - "Paid shills" oh really? Got any evidence of that? All these thousands of people involved in the conspiracy eh and not one shred of evidence. Not one witness. Not one whistle blower. You honestly believe this don't you? It just sound paranoid beyond belief. Trust me there are plenty of people believe all sort of insane theories about 9/11. It seems most "truthers" do not believe the actual planes hit the buildings.
@WillShakespeare2007 LoL no that is not true no actual truther thinks that no planes hit the buildings. The no plane theory was put forth by provacatuers/shills or disinfo agents to make you think that it is truthers when really its just an attempt to discredit them, as if they need any help in being discredited RoFL.
There is alot of evidence of provactuers, just research it. Then maybe you will start to see the big picture. The majority of those crazy truther ideas are disinfo agents. Apparently its working because you are falling for it.
@SuperBigGulps - So you believe there are hundreds of people being paid to spread this information on the web. People from all over the world and not one has come forward with proof of this. They would make millions selling the story and exposing the U.S. but no they just keep working away posting comments for minimum wage or whatever you think they get paid. That is just paranoid nonsense.
@WillShakespeare2007 They already have come forward. Dont you relize that any story they dont want you to hear about is only reported on one time and then you never ever see it on the news again. You may see a story in a local newspaper but the national media wont pick it up if they dont want you to hear about it. So unless you live in that area where that local paper is distributed you will never hear about it. Didnt you watch that video I sent you? Its the proof you asked me for.
@SuperBigGulps - There are media outlets across the world. There are literally thousands of outlets. Anyway please send the video again I did not get it. Thanks.
@SuperBigGulps - Go and tell this guy he is working for the government as he believe that the building was hit with a hologram - /watch?v=j2q2mD2HaKA&lc=KAOSQLp8wFKOnSUiNdxw4lS3B0L0pPiecmuFk65JPT8&feature=inbox
@TheQuietWeeder I see that you state that Building 7 was brought down by controlled demolition, so I'd like to ask you an important question. Why do you think that the Fire Department gave a final order to abandon the WTC7 building and surrounding area at 2:30 P.M.? (The building collapsed at 5:20:52 P.M.)
I'd like to ask the same question here that I've asked at least 100 times on various YT channels and have yet to get a reply. You read that correctly, and it is not an exaggeration. I've asked over 100 times and have received ZERO replies. QUESTION: Why did the NYC Fire Department give a final order to abandon the WTC7 building and surrounding area at 2:30 P.M.? (The building collapsed at 5:20:52 P.M.)
Truthers should get their heads out of their asses and quit falling for the bullshit put out there by hack scientists driven by their anti-American agendas.
I re-uploaded Eddy Currents fake .. Its insulting the families of victims demanding a new investigation .. He says WTC7 was NOT a controlled demolition ..
[valuable-2-them: GET OUT OF FUCKING OFFICE, YOU PSYCOHPATHIC CUNTS BEFORE YOU SEE ...REALLL... SHOCK AND AWE. YOUR PUNISHMENT WILL BE BEING ALIVE TO SUFFER IT.]
Look up! those are chemtrails masking the real truth. 9/11 was just the seed that has been growing for over 10 years now, resistance to they're matrix is your best weapon , no vaccinations,be careful what you eat,purify your drinking water,eliminate bottled water, never watch main street media news or movies. start putting together a survival bag even if you have to do it a little bit at a time I know some of these items can be expensive Thanks&Peace out
TheRemedy2012 3 days ago
Eddie Currant is a douche..and so are the people who look for racial underpinnings for his douchery..Ron Paul 2012!
DecassyJake 5 days ago
I ban and censor the shit out my comments/websites/forum etc. I make no qualms about it, Jews censor the shit out of us when we put out our info, we sure aren't going to play fair with Jew-trolls
Prothink2 1 week ago
@Prothink2 Non-Jews have no leadership, and if one arises, non-Jews will attack him for the Jews. It's always win-win for Jews because of their cohesion and memory.
Euthanology 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
YouTube SEX WITH NOCKHASH 1of3"Biggest SECRET in the WORLD "Crypto JEWS with BLACK NOBILITY started the JESUITS
7 Top Jesuits are J & B/N
A Crypto jew is a JEW or BLACK NOBILITY pretending to be a Catholic, Jesuit's 14 Million Pretend to be PROTESTANTS & ISLAMIC
Head of ILLUMINATI Adam Weisphaut Shape Shifter= wwwORIGINALBIBLEcom Crypto Jew pretending to be a Jesuit Professor
Crypto is someone who Openly Pretends to be One thing in SECRET they are Something Else Google BLACK NOBILIT
deadadelta 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
By now it is proven that SOPA is traced back to elements within the US government and their Zionist Jew lobbyists in higher NWO positions as a means of national control and future depopulation program, the direct 9/11 connection revealed by neo-con agent/landlord Larry Silverstein is evident in the controlled demolition of WTC 7, the smoking gun.
As a result of NPAA meetings in neo-con headquarter WTC 7, Rothchilds contacted 3000 Jews to stay home on 9/11.
"Pull it." - Zionist Jew Silverstein.
JamesCorbett911 2 weeks ago
lol wtg rys... how bout ae911truth and the cash cow they have created? Sure put out vids with experts explaining the facts about 9/11... but to turn it into a cash machine like YT user ae911truth... complete with T-shirts for sale etc...Christ they are making Gene Simmons from Kiss look like an amateur salesman... meanwhile in real time a few thousand dead people voted in the republican race last week.. but don't tell that to a truther you will get called a shill... hahahahahahaha
ALoENoMESeLL 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ALoE
Do some research, shill. 9/11 dates back to the 1970's Zionist affairs.
The Bilderberg group made a deal with Zionist Jew Larry Silverstein to rig the WTC with explosives to eventually destroy traceable evidence of illegal fundings of the new global economy program, tanked by NWO, the Fed and Eurobanks.
Rothchilds opine the US war crimes if kept to/in the NWO kangaroo charade, could acquit many individual Neo-Con Zionist perps, while nullifying the pesky US Constitution.
JamesCorbett911 2 weeks ago
@ALoENoMESeLL sorry YOUR THE DISINFO agent
Riddlerx333x 1 week ago
@Riddlerx333x care to elaborate? <---- unless this word is too big for you
ALoENoMESeLL 1 week ago
@ALoENoMESeLL not really since your just here to spread propaganda TROLL
Riddlerx333x 1 week ago
@Riddlerx333x @Riddlerx333x yep I am a troll.... sure I have no problem with that... now have a nice life
ALoENoMESeLL 1 week ago
@ALoENoMESeLL BITCH!
Riddlerx333x 1 week ago
@ALoENoMESeLL case in point with the lil kid corbett911 hahahahaha....
ALoENoMESeLL 1 week ago
Comment removed
Riddlerx333x 2 weeks ago
@Riddlerx333x Hmmm. I see your one of those doh does who has been taken in by the mainstream media containment movement Jesse Ventura, and you like the Govt paid Anonymous zio-shills who want you all to go out and get your asses kicked by occupying places... a go nowhere movement designed by Zionist Gene Sharp and lo and behold the foreigners with bullhorns all over the place directing occupy ppl... man... wanna buy a bridge?
ALoENoMESeLL 2 weeks ago
You ought to look up operation northwoods you dumb ass.. thousands of architects, engineers, firefighters have unanswered questions about 9/11 never before has a steel frame building collapsed due to fires.. DON'T LISTEN TO THIS IGNORANT FUCKWAD where is your proof dipshit? you actually believe the official story!!?! even members of the commission report said they were covering for each other.. how about the members of the victims families at the hearings not being told real answers. U SUCK!!!
H20man11 2 weeks ago
ZERO TOLERANCE FOR RETARDS???----WELL THERE GOES MOST OF AMERICA......HOW DO YOU LIKE YOUR MUSLIM KING OBAMA??--- AND THERE ARE AMERICANS THAT ARE SRSLY THINKING ABOUT PUTTING HIM IN FOR ANOTHER 4 YEARS.....NDAA ...ALLAH ACKBAR!!!
NOSERPICOINUTAH 2 weeks ago
say no to drugs
48mmwatch 3 weeks ago
i dont really know what need to happen for some ppl to believe... for everybody who is interested look for 9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out, Full-length, there is a 2h document, engineers and scientist say why OFFICIAL story doesn't add up, just watch it... i say again ENGINEERS and SCIENTS... and they tell why official story is against science or maybe you guys dont believe in laws of physics?!
krzysg1982 3 weeks ago
I've paused at 0:04 because I know this will be waste of my time....I'm now off to another shit video.
TheTallyOBan 4 weeks ago
You Sir are a MORON!
lindadurbin 1 month ago
Edward Current claimed to be the one who faked it just to show how gullible many of the truthers are, and how convince bullshit can be to the ignorant masses.
CorkPhop 1 month ago
Thanks Stunning details amazing.
Hullujenpieru 1 month ago
'Zero Tolerance on Retards' <=== need that sign for my door.
tammymism 1 month ago
nobody notice the UFO??
Andy205ro 1 month ago
@CrusaderJustice
The official story doesn't add up. Watch Architects and Engineers most recent documentary here: watch 911 Explosive Evidence on my "Imperialism" playlist
dialectical44 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@CrusaderJustice
The official story doesn't add up. Watch Architects and Engineers most recent documentary here: watch?v=lw-jzCfa4eQ&list=PL40EC1DB99A4A3C57&index=7&feature=plpp_video
dialectical44 1 month ago
@CrusaderJustice
The official story doesn't add up. Watch Architects and Engineers most recent documentary here: watch?v=lw-jzCfa4eQ&list=PL40EC1DB99A4A3C57&index=7&feature=plpp_video
dialectical44 1 month ago
this guy used to be smart than he took an arrow to the brain
inceptionhd1 1 month ago
@inceptionhd1 skyrim is everywhere
ApostateOfTheDamned 1 month ago
I have been next to a CD of a large building. Let me assure you that had B7 had explosives in it everyone in lower Manhattan would know about it.
Very silly stuff.
roquefortfiles 1 month ago
@roquefortfiles We do know about it dip-shit.
UNTC321 1 month ago
Comment removed
roquefortfiles 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@UNTC321 There are a half a dozen videos of B7 coming down. Would you like to show me even one that has this kind of audio?
This is what shaped charges sound like in a city setting. Show me this at B7.
You won't. Prove me wrong.
watch?v=obJe66QHx_Y&feature=related
roquefortfiles 1 month ago
the video is obviously fake. and 911 is obviously an inside job.
wtfronsson 1 month ago 14
this guy is an expert ....yeah right
arrowmint12 1 month ago
You're Stupid!!! D:<
StudiosXPS 1 month ago
go look at the B52 that crashed into empire state building google it. one plane (made of steel) one building made of older concrete no downed building. jet engine fuel must be airborne in order to burn an intial explosion would have been expected but to burn for so long is absolutely proposturous. go look up a few plane crashes and tell me if it makes any sense there are videos on you tube of the F 15 that flew into the side of wtc7 on the other side of THIS building.
Zanzabarism 1 month ago
@Zanzabarism The jet fuel is not what was burning through most of the fire... It ignited other materials in the offices.
MrAwsome514 1 month ago
@Zanzabarism No B52 ever crashed into the Empire State Building.
azul8811 19 hours ago
9/11 : American General Says 911 was an inside job
watch?v=M6ooQSp3KhU
ewingsco 1 month ago
Explosions clearly visible - well below supposed crush zone :
watch?v=NxGJHTlpOc8
ewingsco 1 month ago
Thats what Iam saying, people are so fucking gulliable these days..Cmon fucking idiots.
HiLiLjit 2 months ago
i'm new to your channel but I have to say I'm liking what I hear.
JonathanJWB1 2 months ago
lol, zero tolerance for retards.
JonathanJWB1 2 months ago
Always love your work brother... Keep up the good fight.
No more tolerance for missiletards... hahaha... go get 'em
pokerface
pokerfacecom 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I have no idea what you are babbling about. WTC7 was a planned demolition.
dialectical44 2 months ago 16
@dialectical44 no it was not... Try looking at the video of the collapse again and watch the side of the building that is in the smoke. That side of the building actually collapsed 8 seconds before the rest of the building. That is an asymmetrical collapse... You do not get that with a controlled demolition unless some one seriously messes it up.
MrAwsome514 2 months ago
@dialectical44 By the way... how do you propose they managed to both plant thousands of demolition charges in the towers (which would have taken over a week to do) in an active office building undetected, and some how manage to prevent any of the charges from detonating prematurely inside buildings from completely uncontrolled office fires? Even if they could do these things... They cannot account for how the fire damage would change the structural integrity in their placement planning...
MrAwsome514 2 months ago
@MrAwsome514
They didn't manage to prevent any of the charges from detonating prematurely inside buildings.
Observe :
watch?v=PbbZE7c3a8Q
& WTC Eyewitness Explosion In The South Tower Lobby
watch?v=8e0kNFImu88
You either haven't done enough research or you are one of the ones trying to keep the official version of events believable.
ewingsco 1 month ago
@ewingsco
watch?v=PbbZE7c3a8Q
I love how the first "eye witness" states quite specifically "There was an explosion beneath me" and yet if there really was an explosion which he could actually see happening right under him then it should have killed him. No... He did not witness an explosion. He felt he felt the floor under his feet move suddenly and probably thought it was an explosion but there are thousands of other things that could have caused it... This is the best you have?
MrAwsome514 1 month ago
@MrAwsome514
Here's another angle.
Explosions clearly visible.
Observe :
watch?v=ma13I76Sb10
ewingsco 1 month ago
@ewingsco Again... those are not explosions. They are the 500,000 cubic feet of air between each floor being forced out of the building as it collapses. In a controlled demolition the explosions occure prior to the collapse not during the collapse.
MrAwsome514 1 month ago
@ewingsco By the way those "explosions in the lobby" were reffering to the sky lobby below the impact zone. Each floor of the buildings had about half a million cubic feet of air inbetween them. As the building collapses that air is forced out through what ever exit it can find.much of the air was forced out through the windows of the floor but much of it also was forced through the elevator shafts into the sky lobby blowing out several windows of the lobby before the collapse reached it.
MrAwsome514 1 month ago
@MrAwsome514
Hi. You're talking utter shit. Why ?
Play attention to what this firefighter guy says 1.35
NEWLY RELEASED Testimony From FDNY Firefighters of Secondary Explosions
watch?v=rGuCsBa9e8w
Pay -particular - attention to it.
ewingsco 1 month ago
@ewingsco Look man... No one SAW any explosions. They heard sounds that they DESCRIBED as explosions but they cannot confirm what the source of the noise was for certain. There are thousands of possible explainations for those sounds. It could have been anything from falling debris crashing into the ground to sounds from the fires echoing down the elevator shafts.
MrAwsome514 1 month ago
@MrAwsome514
Yeah you cling to that. If you want to tell me the sky isn't blue and dirt isn't dirt - then go right ahead.
Can you explain how all three buildings accelerated downward into their own mass during their collapses ?
Impossible without use of cutter charges.
This is explained further here :
9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out
watch?v=lw-jzCfa4eQ
ewingsco 1 month ago
@ewingsco Damn you really are stupid aren't you... 500,000 cubic feet of air inbetween each floor and you can't figure out how it managed to collapse into it's self. It is because most of it's volume is air dumb ass... I love how you retards are so selective as to which of the laws of physics you will pay attention to...
MrAwsome514 1 month ago
@MrAwsome514
Your answer shows me that you didn't understand my question.
Here it is again.
How come all three buildings -accelerated- downwards into their own mass ?
Explained further here :
Solving the Mystery of WTC 7
watch?v=hZEvA8BCoBw
DO try and wrap your head around this. Lives are at stake.
ewingsco 1 month ago
@ewingsco It is very simple... The fall speed of the building was measured based upon the rate at which the roof fell. It was not just the lower potion of the building that was crumbling from the weight of the upper portion crashing down into it. The underside of the upper portion was also crumbling because it was constantly being bombarded by debris from the lower portion. The roof of the building actually fell considerably faster then the rate at which the actual collapsing area did.
MrAwsome514 1 month ago
@MrAwsome514
Bullshit
The building doesn't have time to knock it self out of the way - in the time it took it to collapse - if it collapsed in the way you describe.
And your bullshit answer does not explain violent explosive lateral ejections well below the supposed 'crush zone' as seen here :
watch?v=NxGJHTlpOc8
Explosions clearly visible.
So you can shove your -weak- explanation for what I'm seeing in this clip.
Go tell it to someone else - and hope that they believe you.
ewingsco 1 month ago
@ewingsco hey dumb ass... You just defeated your own argument. Want to know how?
"violent explosive lateral ejections" That is how.
You see explosive demolition charges are extreamely LOUD. They can be heard echoing for miles. In addition to this even though they are very loud they are also quite small. Infact they are generally only poweful enough to destroy the column they are attached to. In other words they wouldn't be powerful enough to cause those ejections any way...
MrAwsome514 1 month ago
@ewingsco By the way those "explosions" you say that were "clearly visable"... If you had actually read what I have been saying here I allready explaiend this. As the building collapsed the air inside (approximately 500,000 cubic feet of air per floor) was forced out. A lot of it went out through the windows as the floors collapsed but some of it was forced through elevator shafts blowing out windows on the sky lobby below... this air carried out with it crushed cement dust from the debris.
MrAwsome514 1 month ago
@ewingsco Are you even aware that most truther's abandondoned the explosive demolition theory ages ago? When they were confronted by the issue of explosions being loud enough to damage the hearing of every survivor within a mile of the building they stopped claiming it was an explosive demolition and whent with a more logical theory that it was a demolition using thermite charges... Which are not explosive and instead simply melt the beams... ofcourse this theory has no proof either...
MrAwsome514 1 month ago
@MrAwsome514 but what is known though(as far as my research has taken me) is that the official story claimed the collapse was due to office fires. but even if that were the case, fire shouldnt have reached tempatures hot enough to melt the steel framing.
0893deuce 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrAwsome514 but what is known though(as far as my research has taken me) is that the official story claimed the collapse was due to office fires. but even if that were the case, fire shouldnt have reached tempatures hot enough to melt the steel framing.
0893deuce 1 month ago
Exactly what video are you referring to?
UnshackledMind86 2 months ago
@UnshackledMind86 watch?v=k8VAsoVuShM&feature=relmfu
ZDanielRogers 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You are scared....
jombus1 2 months ago
How did this guy know?
ThePeoplesuk 3 months ago
I must say that I find amusing the words 'discredit the movement'. Eddie did to laugh at the movement, but discredit implies that there exists credit. And that is quite funny.
integralmath 3 months ago
@integralmath you're a douche.
zakquack 3 months ago
@zakquack I daresay that you've just written the most comprehensive, succinct, novel and accurate assessment of ever to grace the internet. And you even successfully distinguished 'your' from 'you're'.
Now, moving on from that - precisely what was incorrect in what I said? Oh, oops. Now I see why you wrote what you did.
Retard.
integralmath 3 months ago
@integralmath you know what you said... watch?v=lw-jzCfa4eQ None of these people have credibility? Everyone speaking in this video is a PhD or an architect or is an expert in a related field. Many have been given awards for scientific excellence... You realize, for building 7 to collapse the way it did, 400 connections PER SECOND would have to fail?
zakquack 3 months ago
@zakquack oh, this could be interesting. I cannot tell you how often I read science journals which note that x number of non-experts (architects) and people in related fields (engineer is a broad term) plus 10,000 regular people agree, with over 25,000 years of combined experience agree! If this is a long series of fallacious posturing, I don't know what is. The first one of whom, "if we are to believe that fire brought down". That isn't the claim. Oh boy, this is going to be long.
integralmath 3 months ago
@integralmath I..... should just smile and back away slowly... I have encountered very intensely insane people on the internet before... it was not fun... this is always how it starts... An excited rambling with no clear breaks between ideas and absolutely no discernable point...
zakquack 3 months ago
@zakquack an inability on your part to apprehend a point doesn't imply the absence of one on my part. 1.) architects are not experts in controlled demolitions. Lynn Margulis is not an expert on buildings in anyway at all. Her field is genetics, in particularly she determined the symbiotic evolution between mitochondria, and chloroplasts. Yet, she's being interviewed for her opinion? Why? She's no more qualified to opine than I am. My PhD is certainly not inferior to hers; it's just not my field.
integralmath 3 months ago
@integralmath And the structural engineers? The ex-military personel with demo training? The civic engineers? The fire safety experts? there's a lot of experts... I think they were selected mostly on merit of what they had to say, with the credentials there to verify that these people are not crazy..
zakquack 3 months ago
@zakquack I'm uncertain what insight having once been in the military and using explosives to blow up things gives one into how structures generally may or may not collapse. In fact, computers have trouble solving these types of problems. So naturally, human 'experience' is a perfectly acceptable gauge. Yes, what about all of these engineers? (continued)
integralmath 3 months ago
@integralmath You're "uncertain what insight having once been in the military and using explosives..."
So, you're saying if you've been trained to pinpoint weaknesses in steel-reinforced high-rises and use explosives to bring them down and you've executed your training in exercises and then analyzed the results hundreds of times it would give you no insight into the behavior of failing structures? look, i'd rather not continue this argument... i don't know what your agenda is, but i don't like
zakquack 3 months ago
@zakquack you're free to concede the attempt at an argument anytime you'd like. And what I said, despite your reading skills, was that being trained in planting and detonating explosives gives one no insight whatever into how structures either will or must fail in the absence of explosives. Of course, it doesn't give one particularly meaningful insight into how they must or will collapse in the presence of explosives generally for that matter. But that's irrelevant in this case.
integralmath 3 months ago
@integralmath Thats a severely pigeonholed approach... but so is everything you're going to say to me...
I'm not interested in this. Happy thanksgiving.
The goal in communication is to communicate. If your recipient fails to comprehend, YOU STILL have failed to communicate.
zakquack 3 months ago
@zakquack communication with you might have failed. This implies nothing whatever about where the failure lies, or whether communication itself even failed. For, as I've noted, your inability to read what is actually written doesn't impinge in the slightest on whether or not communication is taking place. All it determines is how available that communication is to you. No doubt others can perfectly well understand what I've written despite your failure to do so. =^_^=
integralmath 3 months ago
@integralmath If your boss orders you to hand me something and in the transaction it falls to the ground... Will your boss fire me?
NO. because I don't even work for your boss.
in the communication model, your boss is your desire to communicate an idea. You handing it to me is your attempt to communicate that idea. It falling to the ground is my inability to discern your meaning (which I am not accepting blame for, btw). I added a "'t" to your first comment and it makes a lot more sense,btw
zakquack 3 months ago
@zakquack again, it's cute that in your 'am a physics expert' mind, this is a logical correlate to a model of communication. But here's an actual correlate of your dim-witted idea: suppose you're looking through a book written in a language you do not understand. From that, you would conclude it's the author's poor writing ability that prevents your understanding what's there, instead of your inability to read that language. Dostoevsky was an ineffective writer because you don't read Cyrillic.
integralmath 3 months ago
@zakquack why is it that precisely none of them has as of yet submitted for review (that is a step before submitting for publication) a single peer-reviewed paper indicating that they're claims that it is 'impossible' for a steel building to collapse from fire damage alone? You think they were selected on merit of what they say? What someone 'says' isn't evidence of what happened. They needn't be 'crazy' to be simply incorrect.
integralmath 3 months ago
@integralmath that's a bullshit argument and you know it. i'm done. Watch the film... Erect strawmen at them... I'm out.
zakquack 3 months ago
@integralmath you've spent at least two hours trolling the internet trying to 'win' arguments... So spend two hours to watch explosive evidence. It won't matter if you have an open mind or not...
zakquack 3 months ago
@zakquack as it happens, I'm capable of watching the video while talking to you. I am uncertain what is with the charge of trolling for a 'win' has to do with anything. Trolling doesn't seem to fit, and there isn't an argument that's been adduced against which a response is necessary. A chain of assertions and fallacious conclusions drawn therefrom doesn't, alas, constitute an argument in any meaningful sense of the word. But make that dramatic flounce if it suits you.
integralmath 3 months ago
@zakquack it's interesting that the first person to raise the psychological state of those in the video is you. It is not something I've said. Further, it is not 'simply logic' that if communication fails the problem is at the source. In fact, that is merely one possible source of error. There is no logical chain from 'communication failed' to 'therefore the only possible reason is x." Do not pretend to lecture me on logic; you'll only make a fool of yourself.
integralmath 3 months ago
@integralmath Say your boss gives you the job to hand me an object... In the transaction, the object falls to the floor. Will your boss fire me?
LOGIC WIN
zakquack 3 months ago
@zakquack this is a logical correlate in your mind? Now that was quite amusing. You should bottle that up and sell it; you're precious. =^_^=
integralmath 3 months ago
@integralmath lol I like ur khan university knock-off idea.
I'm a physics expert... I've devoted 22 years to the study. Where do you live? I'd love to give you a demo.
zakquack 3 months ago
@zakquack expert you say? Oh my. I have met yet another self-titled expert in a branch of science who demonstrates, oddly enough, a nearly perfect ignorance of how it is that science operates! Sorry, I don't date strangers from the internet. I do appreciate the offer, but I must politely decline so pruriently solicitous a self-invitation as that.
integralmath 3 months ago
@integralmath It's an art and a science. You wouldn't understand because you can't see passed the tip of your nose. You're pompous and self-important. I think my physics demo would do you a lot of good.
zakquack 3 months ago
@zakquack yes, yes, the art of physics. Hey, I bet that's why Berkeley grants a BA in physics, and an MA in it too. To emphasize the art that goes into it, of course. Pointing out that you're a faux-expert in science with dodgy reading comprehension doesn't, alas, imply that I'm important, let alone self-important. In fact, only you've brought up that anyone thinks I'm important.
I'm dubious.
integralmath 3 months ago
@integralmath lol what a pompous a-hole... I really think i can help you out... Right after you sign a waiver
zakquack 3 months ago
@zakquack well, we know that it won't be in any intellectual or academic way, for that would require either superior knowledge or superior reasoning skills on your part. And I've already declined the invitation to go on a date with you. I am, therefore, at a loss to know in what realm you could be the slightest utility to me.
integralmath 3 months ago
@integralmath If you haven't figured it out... I'm a submission grappler and a kickboxer... and I was offering to kick the crap out of you.
zakquack 3 months ago
@zakquack and I must again decline such a romantic overture. Sorry, but like the English major said, it's not you. It's I. As exciting for you as the moment might be, I simply find you lackluster, and am thus not at all excited. And thus not interested in helping you realize your fantasies. But I am tremendously flattered that you've spent so much time and energy thinking about how you'd like to touch me, a mere internet person, in real life. It's flattering, but I must decline.
integralmath 3 months ago
@zakquack 2.) unqualified authorities in a related field are being interviewed. Their opinions are being taken without a single demonstration of precisely what they adduce is a problem. Buildings can't collapse in that way but for controlled demolition. And certainly not from fire. 3.) the '6 second' or '6.5 second' collapse time used in the popular video is simply, demonstrably false as a measure of the collapse time of the entire structure.
integralmath 3 months ago
@zakquack at any rate, I'll just iterate the salient point which gave rise to your comment here: poor reading comprehension and the forbearance of analytic thought on your part do not constitute a failure on mine.
integralmath 3 months ago
@integralmath I appreciate your effort at poking the soft spots... Just watch the video. I don't want you to come to me piece by piece...
You've succeeded in being a pompous asshole... your condescending attitude ain't gonna get you laid. Now, you can neglect the important pieces and continue to point out insignificant shortcomings... Or, you can give a valid argument why I should believe fire could cause coincidences to stack end-to-end... or you can bugger off...
zakquack 3 months ago
@zakquack I've not asked you to believe anything such as I'm aware of the words I've yet selected. This would be another example of your failing to read what I'm writing. What is more is that whether I get laid or seem condescending have nothing whatever to do with the inability of this video's sequence of personal testimonials-devoid of anything resembling the enterprise of science-to present the slightest reason to think it has the ghost of a point; more fallacious reasoning on your part.
integralmath 3 months ago
@integralmath the major pieces of evidence in the explosive evidence has to do with the laws violated and the investigations stifled. really, i'm not interested in arguing with you about this. Go to /physicsandreason
You'll find people to argue with there. I've said my piece. I am trying to convince you of your prejudice, but I know that I am failing. It's no use. And you're absolutely not going to be able to sway me because I've given this ten years of thought and earnest research.
zakquack 3 months ago
@zakquack actually, I think you were trying to convince me that I'm a douche, for that's where you started. My prejudice? I'm aware of it. I am heavily biased in favor of things for which evidence exists, and biased against things for which no evidence exists. Thought and 'earnest research' have no promise of a correct result. But they do tend to give people confidence out of all proportion to their claims in the truth of those claims. It's quite bizarre, but evidently true.
integralmath 3 months ago
@integralmath please proof-read... you've become more coherent since you engaged me... But your first address really doesn't make sense... I couldn't figure out if you were coming or going... And since the purpose of using a language is to communicate an idea, the fault can't possibly lie within the reciever (simple logic). Your goal was to communicate something and you failed.
zakquack 3 months ago
i got the real tape no bullshit
budstattfgangsta 3 months ago
"Discredit the movement" LOL the twoofer movement? ahahha
tjohn1986 3 months ago
@tjohn1986 that is exactly what I thought! The movement discredits the movement. In fact the best word to describe it is "a movement". (that's a poop joke)
mixmastermeeks 3 months ago
@tjohn1986 @mixmastermeeks @integralmath watch?v=lw-jzCfa4eQ none of these people have credibility?
zakquack 3 months ago
@zakquack no, they don't.
shoofirbin 2 months ago
It might be helpful if you specified which WTC7 video you're talking about. There is one that I'm not sure of, but I don't know if it's the one you're referring to.
Also, I'm one of the retards who thinks it's very likely that a missle hit the Pentagon.
1. Lagrasse and Brooks and other witnesses who state the path was not as the Official Story (OS) claimed
2. No video footage
3. No identifiable parts (with I.D. #s)
4. No wings, tail, luggage, seats etc.
4. Hole is too small
ucancallmeOh 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
If the ever so powerful govt. could commit and cover up 911, why did they have to destroy a building (WTC 7) just to destroy some documents?
Couldn't the govt. just haul the documents away and dump them into the ocean?
And do you really believe that those were the only copies?
ctcole77 3 months ago
he's hot
jpayne4494 3 months ago
DON'T LISTEN HAHAHHA THEY HAVE TO BE SHILLS. NOBODY I CAN THINK OF RIGHT OFF IS SO DUMB THEY COULDN'T SEE THE "NOSE OUT" , THE ONLY LIVE FEED ON 911 OF 2ND ALLEGED PLANE. ONLY ONE!! IT GOES THROUGH IT, THEN THEY BLACKEN THE PICTURE OUT. HAHHAH. I'M A MASTER METALLURGIST AND I'M SORRY TO BURST YOUR BUBBLE BUT ALUMINUM STILL WON'T SLICE THROUGH CONCRETE AND STEEL, NOR WILL IT TURN IT ALL TO POWDER. AHHAHAHA THE MEDIA WAS 100% INVOLVED. UNLIKE YOU, I'M THE MASTER OF EVERY SITUATION, YOU'RE NOT
sssssjjjj1 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@sssssjjjj1 I bet you have no proof to back up your claim of being a master metallurgist.
MegaYeshua33 3 months ago
SURE IT WAS RAW FOOTAGE. HAHAHHAHAAH I THINK YOU'VE EATEN RAW PORK.
sssssjjjj1 3 months ago
Edward Current made the video.
Viktir666 4 months ago
You may want to google the Torontohearings There was an International Hearing on the Events of 9/11 in September 2011
Shadowbear1955 4 months ago
A guy who was a contractor at my job worked in one of the WTC's. He filmed the whole thing from Hoboken Bay on 9/11. There was a big as bomb that went off at the bottom of one of those buildings before the plane hit. TV as we know is bullshit, and yes, some of the shit on the internet is fake too.
The video I saw was RAW footage.
Don't be stupid. The masses are going to figure this one out-one day.
Plenty of RAW VHS footage left around like I saw. VHS tapes can't be faked like digital.....
Macross580 4 months ago
@Macross580 Yeah, you're exactly right. There were never special effects prior to computers.
poduck2 4 months ago
The movement? What "movement"? 9/11 "Truthers"? That's NOT a movement. lol
It's a childish ideology with nothing substantial behind it. Just because you WANT to believe in conspiracies... doesn't mean that they are any realer than your vivid yet wild imaginations.
Controlled demolitions my ass. You fucktards are some of the most disrespectful morons on the net. You lack a real set of critical thinking faculties and... balls.
Grow up.
And the driver didn't shoot Kennedy either. Fucktards.
JayJayAbels 4 months ago
@JayJayAbels -lmfao!they are all fucked in the head mate(the truthers or whatever "they" want to call themselves)
Bdiddly1 3 months ago
Hey man can you link me to the wtc7 video you said you have?
jedichris8 4 months ago
COINTELPRO is a real thing, and you best believe its alive & well here on youtube. If you do not know what COINTELPRO is than research it.
JG1635 4 months ago
9/11 The Third Truth with Dimitri Khalezon is a video worth seeing. 9/11 was still an inside job especially if Vladamir Putin says so. lol I say that because he has Russian Intellegience at his disposal.
muttkat 4 months ago
Barry Jennings who worked for the NYC something who seemed like a reputable person was stuck in WTC 7 for hours because a bomb went off yet others say there weren't makes it hard who to believe. Why is it that other videos like the 4409 wtc 7 video shows a vertical line of holes exploding out of 7? Is that one fake too?
muttkat 4 months ago
Excellent
dxvxvx 4 months ago
Excellent video these CIA agents are well funded
dxvxvx 4 months ago
Odd, because I watched this video on the news on September 1, 2001 and it looks just the same to me today as it did 10 years ago. I wish you were right, but you are wrong. There are very important questions to be asked and answered. Denial and anger are a very natural reaction.
arosecarmichael 4 months ago 2
Mental Health Professionals Say that Questioning 9/11 Is the Sane Thing To Do.
Most mental health professionals have concluded that the official version of 9/11 is fraudulent, and that those who BELIEVE the official version suffer from defense mechanisms.
Sociologists have shown that fear causes those people to accept fictitious reports by the media.
The 9/11 Commissioners, Congressional investigators and most of the world do not believe the government’s description of the events on 9/11.
SuperBigGulps 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SuperBigGulps I have a question for you. It's a question specific to WTC7 that I feel is important as the answer has rather significant ramifications. Here it is. Why do you think that the Fire Department gave a final order to abandon the WTC7 building and surrounding area at 2:30 P.M.? (The building collapsed at 5:20:52 P.M.)
azul8811 4 months ago
In a couple of years the "truthers" will be claiming everything was done with holograms anyway. Who knows what shit they will come up with from one week to another.
WillShakespeare2007 4 months ago
@WillShakespeare2007 Computer graphics, Fake planes, Holograms, and Laser beams are not real theory's put forth by the truth movement. They are disinformation theory's invented by paid shills in an attempt to sway people from looking at any legitimate evidence there may or may not be. They get alot of people this way so don't feel bad.
If you want real info on 9/11 go to AE911truth (dot) org or you can also find good info on 9/11blogger (dot) com
SuperBigGulps 4 months ago
@SuperBigGulps - "Paid shills" oh really? Got any evidence of that? All these thousands of people involved in the conspiracy eh and not one shred of evidence. Not one witness. Not one whistle blower. You honestly believe this don't you? It just sound paranoid beyond belief. Trust me there are plenty of people believe all sort of insane theories about 9/11. It seems most "truthers" do not believe the actual planes hit the buildings.
WillShakespeare2007 4 months ago
@WillShakespeare2007 LoL no that is not true no actual truther thinks that no planes hit the buildings. The no plane theory was put forth by provacatuers/shills or disinfo agents to make you think that it is truthers when really its just an attempt to discredit them, as if they need any help in being discredited RoFL.
watch this video please
watch?v=HYedTmaHt1A
SuperBigGulps 4 months ago
There is alot of evidence of provactuers, just research it. Then maybe you will start to see the big picture. The majority of those crazy truther ideas are disinfo agents. Apparently its working because you are falling for it.
SuperBigGulps 4 months ago
@SuperBigGulps - So you believe there are hundreds of people being paid to spread this information on the web. People from all over the world and not one has come forward with proof of this. They would make millions selling the story and exposing the U.S. but no they just keep working away posting comments for minimum wage or whatever you think they get paid. That is just paranoid nonsense.
WillShakespeare2007 4 months ago
@WillShakespeare2007 They already have come forward. Dont you relize that any story they dont want you to hear about is only reported on one time and then you never ever see it on the news again. You may see a story in a local newspaper but the national media wont pick it up if they dont want you to hear about it. So unless you live in that area where that local paper is distributed you will never hear about it. Didnt you watch that video I sent you? Its the proof you asked me for.
SuperBigGulps 4 months ago
@SuperBigGulps - There are media outlets across the world. There are literally thousands of outlets. Anyway please send the video again I did not get it. Thanks.
WillShakespeare2007 4 months ago
@WillShakespeare2007
Provocateurs,Shills and Disinfo Agents
watch?v=HYedTmaHt1A
Police Provocateurs stopped by union leader at anti SPP protest
watch?v=St1-WTc1kow
Agent Provocateurs Caught Disguised As Anarchists At G20 Pittsburgh 2009
watch?v=KPFC7THiKho
SuperBigGulps 4 months ago
@SuperBigGulps - Go and tell this guy he is working for the government as he believe that the building was hit with a hologram - /watch?v=j2q2mD2HaKA&lc=KAOSQLp8wFKOnSUiNdxw4lS3B0L0pPiecmuFk65JPT8&feature=inbox
WillShakespeare2007 4 months ago
The "trolls" you speak of are those that actually hear anything you have to say.
refondata 4 months ago
you da man ryan
rdp317 4 months ago
regardless.. the building still was brought down with controlled demolitions
TheQuietWeeder 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheQuietWeeder I see that you state that Building 7 was brought down by controlled demolition, so I'd like to ask you an important question. Why do you think that the Fire Department gave a final order to abandon the WTC7 building and surrounding area at 2:30 P.M.? (The building collapsed at 5:20:52 P.M.)
azul8811 4 months ago
if you dont live in nyc shut up you werent there
stoneybrotherbass 5 months ago
Well f-ing said man.
johnnyshamma 5 months ago
This new pres is very deceiving
phackqu 5 months ago
Fake as obamas birth cert.?
phackqu 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I'd like to ask the same question here that I've asked at least 100 times on various YT channels and have yet to get a reply. You read that correctly, and it is not an exaggeration. I've asked over 100 times and have received ZERO replies. QUESTION: Why did the NYC Fire Department give a final order to abandon the WTC7 building and surrounding area at 2:30 P.M.? (The building collapsed at 5:20:52 P.M.)
azul8811 5 months ago
Truthers should get their heads out of their asses and quit falling for the bullshit put out there by hack scientists driven by their anti-American agendas.
sumrexseguirajoderte 5 months ago
I re-uploaded Eddy Currents fake .. Its insulting the families of victims demanding a new investigation .. He says WTC7 was NOT a controlled demolition ..
owainglyndwr16 5 months ago
How much did NIST pay you to say these words ?
DubaiStore 5 months ago
Ry, please go to watch?v=k8VAsoVuShM and make this video a response to that one.
CornFlu 5 months ago
Respond to this video... Why do I need subscribers? I'm not an attention seeker... Duh.
beaujeste1 5 months ago
@AiskAbhroAile Why do I need subscribers? I'm not an attention seeker.
beaujeste1 5 months ago
@AiskAbhroAile Better ppl then you will ever be.
GhostDog65 5 months ago
4.H .psychos.office. Dr Dean's job list item no.13. psychopathic.redredredred4444
fuckoverload 5 months ago
3. Checkmate (as Eddie says).
You were fucked long ago. Give it up or suffer.
fuckoverload 5 months ago
[valuable-2-them: GET OUT OF FUCKING OFFICE, YOU PSYCOHPATHIC CUNTS BEFORE YOU SEE ...REALLL... SHOCK AND AWE. YOUR PUNISHMENT WILL BE BEING ALIVE TO SUFFER IT.]
fuckoverload 5 months ago
You don't honestly think the US are capable of blowing up a building do you when it's far more valuable than the niggers they cook.
Oh wait... ;)
Talented man, Eddie Current.
fuckoverload 5 months ago