I was in Auschwitz two times and I saw with myself the realy true. The Swedish people were sitting this man on plane back to England same day he was arriving to Sweden. Move him to a desert or uninhabited island there he can talk free.
I watched this movie called 180movie it was very good, it compares the holocaust with abortion watch this award winning documentary and see where you stand at the end. At least watch the trailer and see if you are interested.
Look up 180 movie on youtube or 180movie.com
If you are thinking of having an abortion this is a must see.
"and so i believe today that my conduct is in accordance with the will of the almighty creator. in standing guard aginst the jew i am defending the handiwork of the lord." mein kampf
What will happen to the Jews when the world found that they lied about Germany? Will they be forced to return all the money that Germany was forced to pay? Will that destroy the state of Israel since they won't have money to buy f-16s and tanks?
I know that the bloody Holocaust as the Jews portrayed it is a fiction. The rest of you just have a hard time accepting this. Grow up already, bastards.
the attack on the somme on july 1 1916 was not a failure because of strong german positions. it failed because rawlingson told his 120-200,000 soldiers to walk across the field and play football. the germans saw this as an easy target and knocked them off. the 54,000 casualties is inaccurate. the death toll is higher. i read and battalions were taking 70-90% casualties meaning the casualties should be between 75-180,000 casualties. and there is proof global warming is false. and obama is stupid.
did you know in the american civil war, more unionist had slaves than confederates? the confederate generals lee, jackson and 90% of their officers were against slavery, and confederate soldiers were poor so they would not have any. sherman and grant had slaves and so did virtually all of their union officers. and the union soldiers were richer and about a third of them either owned slaves or had family members that did.
the british did not help belgium in ww1 because of the peace treaty of 1834. it was because germany was a naval power and britain wanted an excuse to attack germany.
germany was only defeated because of the communist uprisings. hitler was financed by britain because britain saw the USSR as a major threat. hitler should have been able to take russia. russians were happy that communism might end but he made them slaves, so the russians got angry and fought back.
harold 1 was not a dumb general at the battle of hastings like some people think. he just happened to die first, and there is little evidence that he was shot in the eye.
there is proof that richard 3 of york did not infact kill the princes in the tower. the black plague was not caused by rats because rats did not go to iceland until 1412 yet people died from the plague of 1348-52.
napoleon should have won the battle of waterloo. he had the british on their knees, but fog delayed him.
pompey actually killed all but 2,000 people not 2,000, because it spread across the bay of naples killing thousands there and the romans wanted to minimize casualties.
hannibal really won the war. but he wanted the romans to surrender unconditionally. had he just walked into rome, rome would have fallen.
there is a lot of evidence that brutus did not kill caesar intentionally. they were attempting to outsmart the assassins but they were too many.
until i was 14, i was an all out believer in the story, and i use to be infuriorated reading the stories. but when i was 14 and entering high school, i decided i would read history up more closely rather than one view of everything, and i have realized that everything from ancient to modern history has been fabricated. knowing the real version of history is like going to court to piece in evidence. most of the time it is ok, but there are those rare exceptions where debate is out of the question
what is dumb is anyone who debates the holocaust is a neo-nazi. most historians who debate it have no interest in the nazis. plus i will show you what a real neo-nazi would say.
"i don't like jews. so the holocaust never happened. heil hitler!"
When examining and challenging the Holocaust you need to answer the following.
The size and makeup of Auswitz in terms of numbers of barracks, average life expectancy, daily transit arrivals, and that no elderly, infirm and few children were kept are all well documented.
You have failed to put foward any alternative theory as to what happened to this surplus population. An alternative theory can then be tested for evidence to support it. Hence you do nothing but discredit yourselve.
The best response to this discredited Holocaust-denier and phony historian is given in the following book: Richard J. Evans, "Telling Lies about Hitler" (London, 2002) - it includes extracts from a damning 350-page summing-up of DI by a British High Court judge.
Mr. Justice Gray outlined DI's omissions, distortions and suppression of relevant evidential historical material, concluding that DI "manipulates the historical record in order to make it conform with his political beliefs."
In case you're unaware of the bullet in your own foot, Daving Irving knows his audience and realizes that they get his sense of ironic humor about the weasley holocaust witnesses, which of course, you don't. Furthermore, Irving sites a British archival researcher who discovered that the Psych Warfare branch of British Intelligence was a principal behind the Auschwitz myth, not just 'New York'. Perhaps you need to watch the video again.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Irving shoots his own claim that the Auschwitz myth was made up in New York in the foot, but admitting that dozens of witnesses were called at Nuremberg to give evidence about what happened in Auschwitz. The holocaust just happened, Mr. Irving. I respect his critical thinking and unwillingness to believe things without evidence, but his conclusions are just mistaken.
Are you asking where are the Jews who used to live in Europe? They went to Israel, the U.S., South America, and Africa. Are you implying that because they disappeared, the Germans must have murdered them? That seems irrational, doesn't it?
Rated this "5" stars above. Thought-provoking information that puts a lot of the pieces of the puzzle together. Jews themselves, back in the Bible, with Joshua leading armies, slaughtered their enemies, burned their homes, cattle, fields, and then put people in ovens. To me, the Jewish Slovak letter sounds more like Jewish Bible-type, and mythology type of thinking. It would be like comparing signatures to see if they match. Well, writing and ideas can be compared, and the letter seems faked.
This has been flagged as spam show
I was in Auschwitz two times and I saw with myself the realy true. The Swedish people were sitting this man on plane back to England same day he was arriving to Sweden. Move him to a desert or uninhabited island there he can talk free.
Odysses100 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I watched this movie called 180movie it was very good, it compares the holocaust with abortion watch this award winning documentary and see where you stand at the end. At least watch the trailer and see if you are interested.
Look up 180 movie on youtube or 180movie.com
If you are thinking of having an abortion this is a must see.
standingontruth1 3 months ago in playlist J039 - Holocaust II -- Zundel, Cole, Irving and Faurisson
you have GOT to be kidding me. you ignorant nazi idiots need to wake up. the halocaust happened. people have survived it and there is proof.
god im german, i dont deny it. hitler was a horrible person.
acting like it didnt happen is so immature and ridiculous
Thegoldenchocobo 9 months ago
There is tons of documentation of what happened in the camps, how the hell can you deny this
DSchiebs 10 months ago
@DSchiebs That documentation is fabricated. Google: One third of the holocaust
At that website you can watch 9 hours of in dept holocaust analysis which debunks the hollywood myth.
redcorona14 9 months ago
Idiots. Of course it happened. You can't deny it. So many people died because of Nazi cruelty. You're idiots.
AstrappingJakeYoung 10 months ago
"and so i believe today that my conduct is in accordance with the will of the almighty creator. in standing guard aginst the jew i am defending the handiwork of the lord." mein kampf
MilitiaOFswejllik 1 year ago
Me Irving you deserve a noble peace prize for your work.Surely i give yoyu one.
aamirmp1 1 year ago 4
What will happen to the Jews when the world found that they lied about Germany? Will they be forced to return all the money that Germany was forced to pay? Will that destroy the state of Israel since they won't have money to buy f-16s and tanks?
DrWmPierceAudio 1 year ago 4
I know that the bloody Holocaust as the Jews portrayed it is a fiction. The rest of you just have a hard time accepting this. Grow up already, bastards.
1962SatanTookOver2 2 years ago 6
brilliant
aybesea 2 years ago
Rus, where do you get these videos? Where can I get a copy?
tallswede80 2 years ago
Sounds more like the Talmud than revisionists to me. Don't even recall neo-nazis promoting genocide but it is all there in your "bible".
FrankinHolland 2 years ago
the attack on the somme on july 1 1916 was not a failure because of strong german positions. it failed because rawlingson told his 120-200,000 soldiers to walk across the field and play football. the germans saw this as an easy target and knocked them off. the 54,000 casualties is inaccurate. the death toll is higher. i read and battalions were taking 70-90% casualties meaning the casualties should be between 75-180,000 casualties. and there is proof global warming is false. and obama is stupid.
ultradumbass 2 years ago
oh and another interesting fact is this.
did you know in the american civil war, more unionist had slaves than confederates? the confederate generals lee, jackson and 90% of their officers were against slavery, and confederate soldiers were poor so they would not have any. sherman and grant had slaves and so did virtually all of their union officers. and the union soldiers were richer and about a third of them either owned slaves or had family members that did.
ultradumbass 2 years ago
the british did not help belgium in ww1 because of the peace treaty of 1834. it was because germany was a naval power and britain wanted an excuse to attack germany.
germany was only defeated because of the communist uprisings. hitler was financed by britain because britain saw the USSR as a major threat. hitler should have been able to take russia. russians were happy that communism might end but he made them slaves, so the russians got angry and fought back.
ultradumbass 2 years ago
harold 1 was not a dumb general at the battle of hastings like some people think. he just happened to die first, and there is little evidence that he was shot in the eye.
there is proof that richard 3 of york did not infact kill the princes in the tower. the black plague was not caused by rats because rats did not go to iceland until 1412 yet people died from the plague of 1348-52.
napoleon should have won the battle of waterloo. he had the british on their knees, but fog delayed him.
ultradumbass 2 years ago
well i'll write you a few examples.
pompey actually killed all but 2,000 people not 2,000, because it spread across the bay of naples killing thousands there and the romans wanted to minimize casualties.
hannibal really won the war. but he wanted the romans to surrender unconditionally. had he just walked into rome, rome would have fallen.
there is a lot of evidence that brutus did not kill caesar intentionally. they were attempting to outsmart the assassins but they were too many.
ultradumbass 2 years ago
until i was 14, i was an all out believer in the story, and i use to be infuriorated reading the stories. but when i was 14 and entering high school, i decided i would read history up more closely rather than one view of everything, and i have realized that everything from ancient to modern history has been fabricated. knowing the real version of history is like going to court to piece in evidence. most of the time it is ok, but there are those rare exceptions where debate is out of the question
ultradumbass 2 years ago
what is dumb is anyone who debates the holocaust is a neo-nazi. most historians who debate it have no interest in the nazis. plus i will show you what a real neo-nazi would say.
"i don't like jews. so the holocaust never happened. heil hitler!"
ultradumbass 2 years ago
Leuchter and all his friends are just perverse stupid liars. And those who believe these lies are full time idiots.
Leuchter and all his friends are just perverse stupid liars. And those who believe these lies are full time idiots.
Leuchter and all his friends are just perverse stupid liars. And those who believe these lies are full time idiots.
Leuchter and all his friends are just perverse stupid liars. And those who believe these lies are full time idiots.
world19555 2 years ago
People who repeat themselves over and over again are insane. You have to repeat the lie over and over again so that it becomes easier to believe it.
tallswede80 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
When examining and challenging the Holocaust you need to answer the following.
The size and makeup of Auswitz in terms of numbers of barracks, average life expectancy, daily transit arrivals, and that no elderly, infirm and few children were kept are all well documented.
You have failed to put foward any alternative theory as to what happened to this surplus population. An alternative theory can then be tested for evidence to support it. Hence you do nothing but discredit yourselve.
Spiceyhotdog 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The best response to this discredited Holocaust-denier and phony historian is given in the following book: Richard J. Evans, "Telling Lies about Hitler" (London, 2002) - it includes extracts from a damning 350-page summing-up of DI by a British High Court judge.
Mr. Justice Gray outlined DI's omissions, distortions and suppression of relevant evidential historical material, concluding that DI "manipulates the historical record in order to make it conform with his political beliefs."
QED.
TerrySleeper 3 years ago
This man is fucking genius with a lotta balls. It's ridiculous to keep him in jail for speaking the truth.
NuclearAssault2 3 years ago 22
What did some of the above do to become imprisoned ?
MINGCHINGBOY 3 years ago 4
In case you're unaware of the bullet in your own foot, Daving Irving knows his audience and realizes that they get his sense of ironic humor about the weasley holocaust witnesses, which of course, you don't. Furthermore, Irving sites a British archival researcher who discovered that the Psych Warfare branch of British Intelligence was a principal behind the Auschwitz myth, not just 'New York'. Perhaps you need to watch the video again.
Kwikbrown 3 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Irving shoots his own claim that the Auschwitz myth was made up in New York in the foot, but admitting that dozens of witnesses were called at Nuremberg to give evidence about what happened in Auschwitz. The holocaust just happened, Mr. Irving. I respect his critical thinking and unwillingness to believe things without evidence, but his conclusions are just mistaken.
josephdrew87 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The Eternal Jew ropaganda film tells that in poland was 4 million jews so were did jews disappear
vytas7 3 years ago
Jewish death counts are based on Communist statistics.
LawrenceErnie 2 years ago
Are you asking where are the Jews who used to live in Europe? They went to Israel, the U.S., South America, and Africa. Are you implying that because they disappeared, the Germans must have murdered them? That seems irrational, doesn't it?
tallswede80 2 years ago 4
I agree with you.
peace
2BeSoReal 2 years ago
Rated this "5" stars above. Thought-provoking information that puts a lot of the pieces of the puzzle together. Jews themselves, back in the Bible, with Joshua leading armies, slaughtered their enemies, burned their homes, cattle, fields, and then put people in ovens. To me, the Jewish Slovak letter sounds more like Jewish Bible-type, and mythology type of thinking. It would be like comparing signatures to see if they match. Well, writing and ideas can be compared, and the letter seems faked.
birdbath7 4 years ago 14