j'admire ce jeune organiste qui bat en même temps qu'il joue ce qui lui assure une continuité et une constance dans le tempo de cette pièce extraoordinaire, félécitation pour cette interprétation magistrale.
A comment about registration: I see no harm in the profuse changes in registration in this fugue. I find this interpretation refreshing and authentic. It's pretty obvious that Bach's thoughts are flowing through this man, and the mix is marvelous.
A comment about registration: I see no need for profuse changes in registration in this fugue. Bach's own music is enough to drive the energy and ceaseless movement towards the two bar trill then it is relentless in its pursuit of the final C major chord. This rolling fugue to me is exemplary perfection of baroque "verve."
I really enjoy this performer. His wiggling at first seemed exaggerated, but once you realize the empathy he has for Bach's spiritual core, then all seems perfect. The tempos were well thought out, since it seems this space does not have much more than about a second and a half reverberation period, though it's difficult to hear, especially in the fugue. Bravo master Karosi, it's on par with Chorzempa, no doubt!
One of my favorite pieces, and done justice in my opinion by this organist. I'm all for taking a piece in a measured way, but some renditions of this most exquisite of Bach's creations are painfully slow and lack momentum. I love the pace this artist adopted. He kept the momentum going and the performance dynamic.
Enjoyed your playing however, I was amused at times why u felt u had to count the tempo when your hands should have been on the keys all the time. As Organ players we try not to over exert what muscles the human body has . The Fernando Germani organ method had the right idea knees together and your back should be straight.
I disagree. I will also have to say that when I listen to this guy's playing, there is not a dull moment that catches my ear... it doesn't seem as if he lost concentration once. The music sounds very much like it was played with a lot of emotion, and as you can see, it was.
Generally, when someone sits and plays as if his back is clued to a post and his nees are tied together, it affects the music very much. - what you hear with most of these recordings is someone sticking too firmly to the rules which they were given and not making any of their own. People should feel free when they play, or else the music suffers.
Magnifique version, très intéressante pour le sens des phrasés et de l'articulation. Seule petite réserve pour le tempo un peu carricatural... mais on entend rarement pareille qualité dans le raffinement et la conduite du discours. Cette pédale chatante, nette et qui respire y fait énormément. Bravo, et quel bel orgue!!
At the end of the day, this is one of the better performances of this piece. Although I have a predilection for a slower pace, I've seen too many videos of this piece now to not be able to judge the playing impartially. So many other organists make errors- He hasn't. So I say: Bravo!
Every organist plays differently, and so what? This guy plays it beautifully, with great passion, and perfection. This is what makes his play so inspiring. I give him a 10 +++ Thank you Karosi!!!
Oh so lovely - how much enjoyment you can get when you see an artist being so much affected by the piece he plays.
As for comparing this with Karl Richter's - I wouldn't care less... I think some people only listen to a performance just to make comparisons - never to enjoy it as it is.
I'm not an organist, but I've loved organ music since I was a teen. I particularly love J.S.Bach. I loved this version of one of my favorite pieces of music. He plays with feeling and everything is crisp and clean. Love it!!!
NOW! Who said this bloke has no feeling to his playing???
I don't think the people that seem to be criticizing have tried to play this. It is so so so difficult. In my opinion this is one of the most difficult of Bach's organ works.
The pace of this organ is a trifle too fast to actually capture the essence of many portions of it, for instance the very end. Here, coupled with the higher pitches being drowned, the end was not as glorious as it was Richters. In the latter's, time seemed to have stopped during the ending, while over here, the ending is gone before you can register it.
Although I've commented many times before, it always appeared as though I was prejudiced toward Richter's version. I'll elucidate that now. The organ Karl Richter plays on (Ottobeuren) sounds better. I mean to say, the amplitude of the higher scales is considerable, whereas over here, the higher pitches are drowned by the lower pitches. This organist follows a fairly uniform registration, while Karl Richter was generous with the stops. This is a limitation of this organ, though.
Richter plays on one of the most supreme organs and he is more romantic although a superbe musician,i prefer the version here it follows the tradition much better
Brilliant performance. Tempo is just right. Remember accounts of Bach's organ playing from contemporaries suggested his breathtaking virtuoso technique. It is likely that his music was played in a "lively" fashion. Once you realise this and get used to these tempos they seem much more authentic to Bach and the music itself.
Anyway a great testament to Bach's towering genius this fugue probably one of the greatest takes us into profound harmonies- note the change from 3' to the pedal at 3'29"
I know the T&F d-moll is of doubtful origin, and may be a bit primitive at points, but I'd love to hear you record it. Have you seen Richter performing it at Ottobeuren?
how about no. Richter is outdated performance style - no idea how to play it in an authentic manner. Listen to the likes of Alain, Koopman, Rogg, even Bowyer - it will be liberating.
Face it, Richter is a dinosaur in the modern era of historical accuracy.
Any of the above (especially his former teacher) is a better role model than ewwy Richter.
is the closest you have got to playing this piece going to youtube and loading up the richter version?
As i said about it, nice instrument, shame the organist is inauthentic. The stop changes you eulogise over would not happen simply because there is no time to take your hands off! And organists had enough difficulty needing to pay for a blower let alone a registration assistant. It never happened. Richter would have had to change those himself or not at all.
I'm not eulogizing- You're maligning. Just because Richter maintained an intelligible pace does not mean he was inauthentic. And there, you admit yourself that the instrument is nice. It is much bigger than this one in fact, and so the stops are a lot more complex. And having someone to change the stops for him does not make him an incompetent organist, mind you. Richter went very generous with the stops and that's what gave his works emotions. Most other 'modern' works are apathetic and dry.
You aren't really getting my point. The fact is that in Bach's day, the conditions the piece was written under, means that it was only possible to change the stops if you physically had chance to lift your hand off the keys and pull it yourself. You wouldn't have had anyone able to do it so the only change you could make is a manual change. Richter has a IVP Riepp masterpiece to play on with a variety of tone colours (not a modern US) and surely should be able to do this without an assistant.
The modern organists eg Koopman, Alain, Rogg, Bowyer are playing on either copies of Baroque instruments or period instruments with the same constraints the piece was written under - no-one to pull the stops, which is why they don't! Richter (and Herrick) play with either assistants or using registration aids so they can change stops when they like, introducing modern technology into Bach - like using an electric guitar. It's been theorised this piece was originally for pedal harpsichord.
Regarding the speed, surely that is how Richter and Karosi see the piece. Alain plays it relatively slowly by modern measures, Isoir plays it under 12 minutes. It doesn't really matter - at the quicker speed, theres a sort of perpetual motion thing going on within the semiquavers.
The only good thing about the Richter recording is the organ he's using.
So your point is that the organ Richter's using is old, and not that Richter's playing is bad, right? And I've heard it was meant for the harpsichord, but that's immaterial. Bach himself had a stop-pulling assistant, FYI.
But the whole *point* is that Bach wouldn't have been able to make stop changes without HIMSELF having a free hand to do so. There's no place in this fugue where you can do anything but a manual change.
Right now, I have other projects that seem more appealing to me, but since it is one of the most popular pieces by Bach, I might be able to record it in the near future...
Balint, my three year old son has found his new favorite you-tube video. You are fun to watch, and we love the Passacaglia! Great job. Well played-- wish we could come to Boston and hear you in person. Please come visit us at the Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception in Kansas City, Missouri!
Yeah, but Hans Fagius does the same thing and it doesn't work. Ab-G-Ab sounds fine on it...
At least you didn't ruin the suspensions just after the trill in both hands - Kevin Bowyer does (it's around 4' in that) by whacking trills on every note in the top line.
Otherwise, this is easily as good as anything on record. 7+5 is 12 mins which puts it as fast paced as Isoir (who can't play the fugue at that speed, there are timing faults) and Bowyer.
Excellent job! I'm sure there will be plenty of experts who will find plenty of reasons to criticize your work but hey, I've been a devoted fan of Bach for 30 years and I think you did a fantastic job. Well done!!
Awesome performance. The brisk tempo and tasteful registration keep the piece from feeling too ponderous.
wernervoss1 4 months ago in playlist More videos from vizipok01
This guy is truly gifted,this is the real spirit of Bach
ebroenroen 5 months ago
what kind of organ is this?
mvwjo 1 year ago
j'admire ce jeune organiste qui bat en même temps qu'il joue ce qui lui assure une continuité et une constance dans le tempo de cette pièce extraoordinaire, félécitation pour cette interprétation magistrale.
douddy21 1 year ago
it's funny on how when the music end, you hear police sirens. FTW
22013 1 year ago
You are fantastic- this is a gorgeous piece, one of my favorite Bach compositions and you certainly did the the 5th Evangel justice!
jppuertorico85 1 year ago
the head bobbing and conducting yourself when you have a free hand is a little over the top. The performance is great though.
hutzman76 1 year ago
não dar para entender o contraponto????
xypz 1 year ago
Very heavy to "keep it rolling" with all those semiquavers. Well done!
rappejopie 1 year ago
Great performance, I was enthralled although I have heard this piece hundreds of times. Thanks.
trevjr 2 years ago
A comment about registration: I see no harm in the profuse changes in registration in this fugue. I find this interpretation refreshing and authentic. It's pretty obvious that Bach's thoughts are flowing through this man, and the mix is marvelous.
jwkuehne 2 years ago 2
A comment about registration: I see no need for profuse changes in registration in this fugue. Bach's own music is enough to drive the energy and ceaseless movement towards the two bar trill then it is relentless in its pursuit of the final C major chord. This rolling fugue to me is exemplary perfection of baroque "verve."
altpapapi 2 years ago
I really enjoy this performer. His wiggling at first seemed exaggerated, but once you realize the empathy he has for Bach's spiritual core, then all seems perfect. The tempos were well thought out, since it seems this space does not have much more than about a second and a half reverberation period, though it's difficult to hear, especially in the fugue. Bravo master Karosi, it's on par with Chorzempa, no doubt!
altpapapi 2 years ago
Great performance!
1239633 2 years ago
I thought that i liked it better slower but for some reason it didnt really matter!! I adored it!
emmysayspeaceandlove 2 years ago
すごいねぇぇ~~!!
shokjh33 2 years ago
Definitely an impressive performance of one of my favorite pipe organ pieces! You have a good sense of the passion JS Bach put into this piece.
MichaelLatulippe 2 years ago
how impressive thie piece of art is!! great interpretation!!! OH DEAR!!!!
alexbradfordalvarado 2 years ago
bright interpretation!!!!!
ATHYAYA 2 years ago
Bwv 582, fugue!!!
morgulddt 2 years ago
Comment removed
xx13blackrose 2 years ago
Comment removed
xx13blackrose 2 years ago
One of my favorite pieces, and done justice in my opinion by this organist. I'm all for taking a piece in a measured way, but some renditions of this most exquisite of Bach's creations are painfully slow and lack momentum. I love the pace this artist adopted. He kept the momentum going and the performance dynamic.
tropiclassic08 2 years ago 2
This is the best music I have ever heard...
Osamabinjackson 2 years ago
Enjoyed your playing however, I was amused at times why u felt u had to count the tempo when your hands should have been on the keys all the time. As Organ players we try not to over exert what muscles the human body has . The Fernando Germani organ method had the right idea knees together and your back should be straight.
lustful2 2 years ago
I disagree. I will also have to say that when I listen to this guy's playing, there is not a dull moment that catches my ear... it doesn't seem as if he lost concentration once. The music sounds very much like it was played with a lot of emotion, and as you can see, it was.
xx13blackrose 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Generally, when someone sits and plays as if his back is clued to a post and his nees are tied together, it affects the music very much. - what you hear with most of these recordings is someone sticking too firmly to the rules which they were given and not making any of their own. People should feel free when they play, or else the music suffers.
xx13blackrose 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Magnifique version, très intéressante pour le sens des phrasés et de l'articulation. Seule petite réserve pour le tempo un peu carricatural... mais on entend rarement pareille qualité dans le raffinement et la conduite du discours. Cette pédale chatante, nette et qui respire y fait énormément. Bravo, et quel bel orgue!!
thomasdeserranno 2 years ago
Comment removed
thomasdeserranno 2 years ago
sehr gefühlvoller Spieler... Gefällt mir gut :)
Praestant32 2 years ago
Absolutely beautiful. I don't know how many times I have listened to this and still cannot get enough of it. He is the best organist ever.
saokoikuno 2 years ago
simply unbelievable performance!!!
bloqq333 3 years ago
The quy is an artist ,outstanding perfomance
tuxedomoon 3 years ago
careful not to headbutt the organ.
willsd87 3 years ago 3
For Daneste 613
I agree!
albertop952 3 years ago
This piece should bring tears to the eyes of a goat even played on a Hammond!
mullah06 3 years ago
Wonderful!
A little rushed.
Like the countersubject notes broken. (first two connected, rest slightly detached.)
Must pedal always have that too loud reed?
Keep the theme notes in the pedal CONNECTED!
Not broken.
robertgift 3 years ago
Not rushed.
Rubsam on Philips, Bowyer and Weinberger all play it as fast or faster.
I don't think you can comment on balance with a camera in the gallery, might be near a pedal tower.
ForestChav 3 years ago
I wish this were in stereo.
I tried adding "fmt=18" but still monaural.
Now I must go play it with pedal notes connected, not detached.
You can't articluate and phrase pedal lines with ALL notes detached.
Why does it seem so many lack the ability to connect notes?
Also, is there ever a pedal registration without 16' reed?
We have Princple chorus in the manuals but must unbalance with a reed in the pedal?
robertgift 3 years ago
Look at his feet! who is this organist?
albertop952 3 years ago
It looks like he's self-taught (like me). My pedal work isn't the most beautiful thing to behold, but I get the job done. :)
admdavid 3 years ago
Self taught :D he studied with Lionel Rogg. Toes only pedalling is considered authentic in Bach.
ForestChav 3 years ago
Balint Karosi - like his profile says, he won the Leipzig Bach competition thingy.
ForestChav 3 years ago
great performance for a great composition.
ilorts 3 years ago
Very, very nice playing! The organ has a great sound as well!
brestull 3 years ago
At the end of the day, this is one of the better performances of this piece. Although I have a predilection for a slower pace, I've seen too many videos of this piece now to not be able to judge the playing impartially. So many other organists make errors- He hasn't. So I say: Bravo!
pipeorganloverNJP 3 years ago
Bravo, Bravo, Bravo !!
Every organist plays differently, and so what? This guy plays it beautifully, with great passion, and perfection. This is what makes his play so inspiring. I give him a 10 +++ Thank you Karosi!!!
Daneste613 3 years ago 3
Daneste613: I like your attitude. Variety is a good thing. We're all different.
redletterchurch 3 years ago
Oh so lovely - how much enjoyment you can get when you see an artist being so much affected by the piece he plays.
As for comparing this with Karl Richter's - I wouldn't care less... I think some people only listen to a performance just to make comparisons - never to enjoy it as it is.
seth669669 3 years ago 3
Very nice performance indeed. A grand organist. I love tgis music played with such talent.
organcomposer 3 years ago 2
I'm not an organist, but I've loved organ music since I was a teen. I particularly love J.S.Bach. I loved this version of one of my favorite pieces of music. He plays with feeling and everything is crisp and clean. Love it!!!
ozziepenguin 3 years ago 3
Moreover, ForestChav, you have to admit that the ending of Richter's version of BWV 582 is unparalleled. Or haven't you listened to it?
pipeorganloverNJP 3 years ago 2
NOW! Who said this bloke has no feeling to his playing???
I don't think the people that seem to be criticizing have tried to play this. It is so so so difficult. In my opinion this is one of the most difficult of Bach's organ works.
Superb performance 5 Stars
OrganistJohn 3 years ago
The pace of this organ is a trifle too fast to actually capture the essence of many portions of it, for instance the very end. Here, coupled with the higher pitches being drowned, the end was not as glorious as it was Richters. In the latter's, time seemed to have stopped during the ending, while over here, the ending is gone before you can register it.
pipeorganloverNJP 3 years ago
Although I've commented many times before, it always appeared as though I was prejudiced toward Richter's version. I'll elucidate that now. The organ Karl Richter plays on (Ottobeuren) sounds better. I mean to say, the amplitude of the higher scales is considerable, whereas over here, the higher pitches are drowned by the lower pitches. This organist follows a fairly uniform registration, while Karl Richter was generous with the stops. This is a limitation of this organ, though.
pipeorganloverNJP 3 years ago
Richter plays on one of the most supreme organs and he is more romantic although a superbe musician,i prefer the version here it follows the tradition much better
tuxedomoon 3 years ago
Why has this video been deleted!?!?
pipeorganloverNJP 3 years ago
Dude; watch the one played by Power Biggs.
pipeorganloverNJP 3 years ago
Etwas ruhiger beim spielen wäre angebracht. Die Musik ist wichtig, nicht die Verrenkung des Interpreten. K. Richter z.B. machts vor!!!
uorgel 3 years ago
Wonderful also!
ronanmurray 3 years ago
inspiring thank you
CAGARWALA 3 years ago
Brilliant performance. Tempo is just right. Remember accounts of Bach's organ playing from contemporaries suggested his breathtaking virtuoso technique. It is likely that his music was played in a "lively" fashion. Once you realise this and get used to these tempos they seem much more authentic to Bach and the music itself.
Anyway a great testament to Bach's towering genius this fugue probably one of the greatest takes us into profound harmonies- note the change from 3' to the pedal at 3'29"
marioout 3 years ago
Outstanding!
zmov1 3 years ago
It is really a great job!
And much much better than Richter's interpretation.
Congratulations!
bartk07 3 years ago
I personally like Richter's better.
pipeorganloverNJP 3 years ago
sounds good but i think a bit too rushed
joeyboi87 3 years ago 2
Wow very well done
suffiice 3 years ago
I know the T&F d-moll is of doubtful origin, and may be a bit primitive at points, but I'd love to hear you record it. Have you seen Richter performing it at Ottobeuren?
ClandOp 4 years ago
Have you seen Richter performing this piece? You really should, because it's unimpeachable.
pipeorganloverNJP 3 years ago
Richter is eww. Ottobeuren is coolness though.
ForestChav 3 years ago
You're eww, you disrespectful mongrel.
pipeorganloverNJP 3 years ago
how about no. Richter is outdated performance style - no idea how to play it in an authentic manner. Listen to the likes of Alain, Koopman, Rogg, even Bowyer - it will be liberating.
Face it, Richter is a dinosaur in the modern era of historical accuracy.
Any of the above (especially his former teacher) is a better role model than ewwy Richter.
ForestChav 3 years ago
Your brain-level is akin to the dinosaur age's.
pipeorganloverNJP 3 years ago
is the closest you have got to playing this piece going to youtube and loading up the richter version?
As i said about it, nice instrument, shame the organist is inauthentic. The stop changes you eulogise over would not happen simply because there is no time to take your hands off! And organists had enough difficulty needing to pay for a blower let alone a registration assistant. It never happened. Richter would have had to change those himself or not at all.
ForestChav 3 years ago
I'm not eulogizing- You're maligning. Just because Richter maintained an intelligible pace does not mean he was inauthentic. And there, you admit yourself that the instrument is nice. It is much bigger than this one in fact, and so the stops are a lot more complex. And having someone to change the stops for him does not make him an incompetent organist, mind you. Richter went very generous with the stops and that's what gave his works emotions. Most other 'modern' works are apathetic and dry.
pipeorganloverNJP 3 years ago 2
You aren't really getting my point. The fact is that in Bach's day, the conditions the piece was written under, means that it was only possible to change the stops if you physically had chance to lift your hand off the keys and pull it yourself. You wouldn't have had anyone able to do it so the only change you could make is a manual change. Richter has a IVP Riepp masterpiece to play on with a variety of tone colours (not a modern US) and surely should be able to do this without an assistant.
ForestChav 3 years ago
The modern organists eg Koopman, Alain, Rogg, Bowyer are playing on either copies of Baroque instruments or period instruments with the same constraints the piece was written under - no-one to pull the stops, which is why they don't! Richter (and Herrick) play with either assistants or using registration aids so they can change stops when they like, introducing modern technology into Bach - like using an electric guitar. It's been theorised this piece was originally for pedal harpsichord.
ForestChav 3 years ago
Regarding the speed, surely that is how Richter and Karosi see the piece. Alain plays it relatively slowly by modern measures, Isoir plays it under 12 minutes. It doesn't really matter - at the quicker speed, theres a sort of perpetual motion thing going on within the semiquavers.
The only good thing about the Richter recording is the organ he's using.
ForestChav 3 years ago
So your point is that the organ Richter's using is old, and not that Richter's playing is bad, right? And I've heard it was meant for the harpsichord, but that's immaterial. Bach himself had a stop-pulling assistant, FYI.
pipeorganloverNJP 3 years ago
Comment removed
advisorC101 2 years ago
Absolutely.
advisorC101 2 years ago
Comment removed
advisorC101 2 years ago
But the whole *point* is that Bach wouldn't have been able to make stop changes without HIMSELF having a free hand to do so. There's no place in this fugue where you can do anything but a manual change.
ForestChav 2 years ago
Comment removed
advisorC101 2 years ago
He could barely afford blowers outside of services (hence practising on pedal-harpsichord) let alone a registrant also.
ForestChav 2 years ago
Comment removed
advisorC101 2 years ago
What are you talking about everyone knows Bach had the ability to change stops by looking at them
Terrdemarzielle 1 year ago
Did he have the spare hand to pull them though?
ForestChav 1 year ago
Assuming the 'spare hand' is some poor goon assigned to pull it for him, then yes. Otherwise no.
Terrdemarzielle 1 year ago
WOW that was truly amazing
perricida 4 years ago
wow, you are gifted
serjitup 4 years ago 4
More likely hard(est) working. This does not come over night.
rp1703 4 years ago
I don't think I'll ever get over how amazing watching you play this song is. :)
bobjones123 4 years ago
Calling this a "song" is like calling Michelangelo's works at Sistine Chapel nice drawings.
milkyleah 3 years ago 3
The chord at 4:22 always gives me the chills...you play the piece with complete abandonment. Bravo!
pianopera 4 years ago
...One little question, why is this video in the "Pets and Animals" Category? Do you bark, nose or bite when you're not playing the organ?
pianopera 4 years ago
Now, this is the artistic expression of Bach that I am expecting. When are you going to play the Toccata and Fugue? I am eagerly waiting!!!
mrtslam 4 years ago
Right now, I have other projects that seem more appealing to me, but since it is one of the most popular pieces by Bach, I might be able to record it in the near future...
vizipok01 4 years ago
Balint, my three year old son has found his new favorite you-tube video. You are fun to watch, and we love the Passacaglia! Great job. Well played-- wish we could come to Boston and hear you in person. Please come visit us at the Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception in Kansas City, Missouri!
crimpkin 4 years ago
I love this song so much and you play it extreamly well. Great job!
bobjones123 4 years ago
Really great and avid performance. Congratulations. Nice to see young peoples dedication to Bach.
Just one minor comment:
In my opinion, the trill in the eigth last bar
on the d flat mayor chord is inappropriate.
The fermata on this chord and the following break could be used to lead the previous
build-up of tension to an ultimate culmination.
YevgeniyAlexey 4 years ago
I use the trill to emphasize the dissonance of the Neapolitan chord. It is accepted in the performance tradition to add trills on major cadenzas.
vizipok01 4 years ago
Yeah, but Hans Fagius does the same thing and it doesn't work. Ab-G-Ab sounds fine on it...
At least you didn't ruin the suspensions just after the trill in both hands - Kevin Bowyer does (it's around 4' in that) by whacking trills on every note in the top line.
Otherwise, this is easily as good as anything on record. 7+5 is 12 mins which puts it as fast paced as Isoir (who can't play the fugue at that speed, there are timing faults) and Bowyer.
Record it at Weingarten or Ottobeuren please!
ForestChav 3 years ago
who cares for perfection, it is the soul that speaks and makes the difference, it brings the usual tears to my eyes, well done!
smitschagen 4 years ago
Excellent job! I'm sure there will be plenty of experts who will find plenty of reasons to criticize your work but hey, I've been a devoted fan of Bach for 30 years and I think you did a fantastic job. Well done!!
onionpizza 4 years ago