Added: 2 years ago
From: GoogleTechTalks
Views: 9,392
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (11)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • what a bunch of crap while overstating the obvious...might as well give us a scientific explanation on how a lawn mower works..

  • I liked all the examples but found the methodology on how to find differences and similarities between art, technology and science cumbersome. It is far easier from a more philosophical perspective: art (subject-relations), technology (inter-subjective) and science (subject-object relations) - which is far more concise. The parameters (growth mode, support structure...) are still fairly arbitrary.. so the revelations at the end are fairly general too and offer no new coherent concept

  • Ahh, got to love these Google tech talks, a great way of informing yourself! Thank you google. =)

  • A fascinating cognitive dance...

  • No wonder it clings to the "Sinful Nature."

    Its a horrible decision to rely on:Humans...

  • I wouldn't agree that science is five hundred years old. Though it was labeled/discovered around that time, the scientific methodology is natural to the human mind and the process of "scientific discovery" is as old as man itself.

  • Very good talk! Have had my thoughts on this aswell but he made it all much clearer. Thanks!

  • Awesome Thanks! :-)!

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more