As the tender curved right, water in the tank sloshed left and raised the right wheel flanges above the rail head, so the left wheels went right off their rail?
@robertgift Tenders are very hard to get unbalanced due to their center of gravity (most locomotive builders thought of that) And I dought the speed of the train was great enough to cause an imbalance. Chances are the weight of the train went over a bad piece of rail and the tender derailed (Thank gosh not the engine).
@LoganisTrainBoy1 Thanks, 1. I don't understand why the heavier engine did not derail. Or is its weight morevenly distributed whereas the tender's weight is on just four wheels causing a higher weight on wheel contact?
@robertgift I saw the rail had flipped on its side after I replied. I am guessing the heavier engine broke the rail but the locomotive still cleared because everything was in line. Then when the gap between the engine and the tender went over the broken section the broken piece shifted. Then when the tender hit it derailed.
I was told by the curator at steamtown that they generate $400,000 a year..that barely covers the fire box, piping of a typical steam Loco..they were frame upin a CP steam loco at a cost of 5 million
@HaloCE14 -- We'll have to disagree on that. The expense of running a locomotive as big as NKP 759 means you need to FILL a very long train every time you run. Are you telling me Steamtown gets that many customers every day?
I would be surprised to find Steamtown makes more than bare operating costs with what they are running now.
A steam locomotive tender is one of the worst riding heavy vehicles on rails because of the amount of unbalanced (fuel vs water) weight shift during operations. Suspension design was always a problem to the mechanical engineers. In the G-3-c class, the light weight of the tender is 68 tons; loaded weight 148 tons. That's around 125% difference over the light weight.
If it was merely a matter of weight, the locomotive (about 160 tons) would have derailed first.
Was there radio communication between the two cabs. It didn't appear that #7 slowed down once the rear car picked the switch going into the passing siding.
My son and I was on the third passenger car from the tender when the outside rail turned. It took the engine crew all of about 7-10 seconds to stop the train. And there we sat for 6+ hours.
At 1:21 you can clearly see an Aldon Co. Rerailer hanging just above the rear truck of the tender. It makes me wonder if they routinely had trouble with the tender derailing.....
The sad thing is that 2317 has been sitting idle most of this season. Steamtown being a National Park can not advertise commercially, and is subject to Federal budget dollars. What this means is that right now, there are less visitors, and hardly any capital investment in preserving steam railroading.
What has always made me sad is that both the mainline excursion engines at Steamtown National Park are Canadian locomotives! I know they are working on the B&M, but that will not be done soon
I know what you mean, Too bad they can't have those "Ride with Thomas" That brings Strasburg tons of money and they been doing amazing in the last years because of it.
@kdlehel -- In Canada, we've given reinforced concrete ties an extensive and expensive trial, and they don't stand up to the extremes of climate. The major railroads are now going to steel ties. However, that solution is probably too expensive for a small line like this.
@jppicur well here is electricaly contrloed and 27kw powerline catenary is present. All time is manicured. The real cold is present here too. -40c to +40 50c degrees.
The control sistem is called indusi and mosly these locomotives here are 8000-9000hps. 120tonnes and has icol cab control sistem. here is not allowed any error like a derailment.
Wow, cool video. You think that the outside rail coming loose and flipping on it's side caused the derailment, or could it have just been collateral damage? I like leaning about how these kinds of things happen. Nice looking engine!
I agree. Why is everyone saying "Lucky it wasn't 3254"? 2317 is the better excursion engine, on account of the fact that it was a passenger engine in its prime
Why is everyone saying "Lucky it wasn't 3254?" Either way it sux it happened. I heard it also happened again in the past month and that's why 2317 hasn't been running.
Your right and the annoying part is that they are losing profits this way if they cant run both. The derailments are happening due to the crews refusing to change the wheel tires..... giving it less traction and making derailments easier?
well the crews aren't refusing...management is...without authorization the crews can do nothing...and the wheels are worn pretty thin....I don't think having the aged tires makes derailments more likely though...I think it only puts a lot more wear on the wheels themselves...but I could be wrong.
@yourweathertodayHD -- At some point, the tires won't meet standards for flange wear and tire thickness and will be outlawed. The biggest danger is in sharp flanges picking a switchpoint and turning everything over!
Not too long ago, SP&S #700, and SP #4449 ran aground in Oregon while running a Christmas Train. It took them I belive 3 days to get both steamers back on the rails.
where there any injuries?
TrainSounds 1 week ago
1:11 This looks like a model train wreck, not a real one! lol
TheStrasburg90 2 months ago
and this is why they need to restore their wrecking crane....
CabooseKid 2 months ago
Comment removed
jrg8008 5 months ago
Fortunatley it doesn't look that bad.
wolevet97 7 months ago
Good thing the tender didn't take the locomotive with it!
longhornandsouthern 7 months ago
should i find the song ironic
tigermki 10 months ago
How bad was the total damage to the train?
paratroop24 11 months ago
Cause?
Uneven weight distribution in the tender?
As the tender curved right, water in the tank sloshed left and raised the right wheel flanges above the rail head, so the left wheels went right off their rail?
robertgift 11 months ago
@robertgift Tenders are very hard to get unbalanced due to their center of gravity (most locomotive builders thought of that) And I dought the speed of the train was great enough to cause an imbalance. Chances are the weight of the train went over a bad piece of rail and the tender derailed (Thank gosh not the engine).
LoganisTrainBoy1 5 months ago
@LoganisTrainBoy1 Thanks, 1. I don't understand why the heavier engine did not derail. Or is its weight morevenly distributed whereas the tender's weight is on just four wheels causing a higher weight on wheel contact?
robertgift 5 months ago
@robertgift I saw the rail had flipped on its side after I replied. I am guessing the heavier engine broke the rail but the locomotive still cleared because everything was in line. Then when the gap between the engine and the tender went over the broken section the broken piece shifted. Then when the tender hit it derailed.
LoganisTrainBoy1 5 months ago
@LoganisTrainBoy1 Thanks Boy1.
robertgift 5 months ago
I was told by the curator at steamtown that they generate $400,000 a year..that barely covers the fire box, piping of a typical steam Loco..they were frame upin a CP steam loco at a cost of 5 million
stevefromPA2 1 year ago
Steamtown loses so much money...........
ooGAMINGoo 1 year ago
@HaloCE14 -- We'll have to disagree on that. The expense of running a locomotive as big as NKP 759 means you need to FILL a very long train every time you run. Are you telling me Steamtown gets that many customers every day?
I would be surprised to find Steamtown makes more than bare operating costs with what they are running now.
jppicur 1 year ago
@HaloCE14 -- What would they do with NKP 759? Far too big and powerful (and expensive) for their needs. Also, why compete against NKP 765?
jppicur 1 year ago
A steam locomotive tender is one of the worst riding heavy vehicles on rails because of the amount of unbalanced (fuel vs water) weight shift during operations. Suspension design was always a problem to the mechanical engineers. In the G-3-c class, the light weight of the tender is 68 tons; loaded weight 148 tons. That's around 125% difference over the light weight.
If it was merely a matter of weight, the locomotive (about 160 tons) would have derailed first.
jppicur 1 year ago
I KNEW my model trains were realistic!
Bus7777 1 year ago
why dosent it show the tender derailing ??? i know its not a nice site to see but it would of been worth a few more coments and views
CyberFur 1 year ago
haha the tender wanted to be different
jackjackthebomb 1 year ago
Was there radio communication between the two cabs. It didn't appear that #7 slowed down once the rear car picked the switch going into the passing siding.
mkrugerrails 1 year ago
That is a beautiful engine!
LordoftheKaty 1 year ago
may as well take off the railroad period costumes. ride's over.
bulletman100 1 year ago
AAAAAAAAAAAAH! you skipped the part when it falls of the tracks! (ANGER)
TheDylanJoyce 1 year ago
OH NO! She's is has twisted her ANKLE! LOL! poor engine :(
4202EJW 1 year ago
I hope that engine is Ok
EmSTrO7x3 1 year ago
I hope they fixed it a real shame! love my steam trains.
Sunclief 1 year ago 2
@Sunclief
Me too
EmSTrO7x3 1 year ago
Ain't gonna be our day.......
RichAtCamp 1 year ago
CAN WE SEE HOW THEY FIX IT?
mdlman583 1 year ago
I hate it when steam engine get derailed in real life!
ThomasRules8391 1 year ago 13
shit happens!
SuperCyberbully 1 year ago
Poor 2317! :(
4202EJW 1 year ago
My son and I was on the third passenger car from the tender when the outside rail turned. It took the engine crew all of about 7-10 seconds to stop the train. And there we sat for 6+ hours.
walter866 2 years ago
wow how did that happen???
Dombomb3131 2 years ago
Probably a weight issue. That steamer is heavier than most Diesels would be.
darkyoda 1 year ago 11
@darkyoda actualy, steamers spread their wight more evenly and are lighter on the track
TheLegoair 4 months ago in playlist Train wrecks and derailments
2317 made her last run on December 5th, the final day of operation at Steamtown for 2009. She is getting the inspection now..
xxxDeath9572xxx 2 years ago
2317 made its last run on December 5th, 2009, as it was the last day of running for the year.. B&ME 3713 is supposedly going to be finished this year
xxxDeath9572xxx 2 years ago
how in the hell did that happen
TheJuggalohomie4life 2 years ago
aww man thats not good...
funnyfunnys 2 years ago
Whos tracks are those?
SteamingObe 2 years ago
id rather see 3713 in service....finally an american engine although 2317 was nice.....i was up in her durring railcamp.
youbite1 2 years ago 2
ARG country music!
It would've been 5 stars except for country music!!!
4 stars and favorite.
WindowsAndMacintosh 2 years ago
how did they get the train back.and the locomotive
shininghappyperson7 2 years ago
At 1:21 you can clearly see an Aldon Co. Rerailer hanging just above the rear truck of the tender. It makes me wonder if they routinely had trouble with the tender derailing.....
ELSDN4319 2 years ago
well, i went yesterday, and i was fine, it was running, i rode on it.
rgerhardtembarq 2 years ago
The sad thing is that 2317 has been sitting idle most of this season. Steamtown being a National Park can not advertise commercially, and is subject to Federal budget dollars. What this means is that right now, there are less visitors, and hardly any capital investment in preserving steam railroading.
What has always made me sad is that both the mainline excursion engines at Steamtown National Park are Canadian locomotives! I know they are working on the B&M, but that will not be done soon
coastercub81 2 years ago
I know what you mean, Too bad they can't have those "Ride with Thomas" That brings Strasburg tons of money and they been doing amazing in the last years because of it.
metalgodaragona1986 2 years ago
Why were you not videoing the train?
You could have captured the derailment.
You can video the mountains ANYTIME!
robertgift 2 years ago 3
plasser&theurer is the solving of rail maintence and concrete ties. Used in europe 100% efficient.
kdlehel 2 years ago
@kdlehel -- In Canada, we've given reinforced concrete ties an extensive and expensive trial, and they don't stand up to the extremes of climate. The major railroads are now going to steel ties. However, that solution is probably too expensive for a small line like this.
jppicur 1 year ago
@jppicur well here is electricaly contrloed and 27kw powerline catenary is present. All time is manicured. The real cold is present here too. -40c to +40 50c degrees.
The control sistem is called indusi and mosly these locomotives here are 8000-9000hps. 120tonnes and has icol cab control sistem. here is not allowed any error like a derailment.
kdlehel 1 year ago
Wow, cool video. You think that the outside rail coming loose and flipping on it's side caused the derailment, or could it have just been collateral damage? I like leaning about how these kinds of things happen. Nice looking engine!
wraith0127 2 years ago
wow, I used to live right in this area. Thanx for posting.
msc4lf 2 years ago
it did go off the rails in 2003...this was then :P
yourweathertodayHD 2 years ago
what was the cause?
microbusss 2 years ago
I agree. Why is everyone saying "Lucky it wasn't 3254"? 2317 is the better excursion engine, on account of the fact that it was a passenger engine in its prime
yerkees01 2 years ago 2
No one was hurt, right?
736berkshire 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
deferred maintenance...rotten ties...that was the cause...over 300 ties were needed at the site of the de-railment alone...
ffej980 3 years ago
deferred maintenance...rotten ties...that was the cause...over 300 ties were needed at the site of the de-railment alone...
ffej980 3 years ago
PC had it worse, they needed 40 million ties.
ibook133 2 years ago
Wide gauge.
papabugs71 3 years ago
NICE!!!
BarryManilowFan4eva 3 years ago
classic model rail crash hope it didnt write off the iron horse
should have got it falling off the rails through
bwarrrrk 3 years ago
Why is everyone saying "Lucky it wasn't 3254?" Either way it sux it happened. I heard it also happened again in the past month and that's why 2317 hasn't been running.
GSpro 3 years ago 3
3254 is 91, and im not sure but im guessing she probably takes a lot more effort to maintain...maybe
yourweathertodayHD 3 years ago
Your right and the annoying part is that they are losing profits this way if they cant run both. The derailments are happening due to the crews refusing to change the wheel tires..... giving it less traction and making derailments easier?
xxxDeath9572xxx 3 years ago
well the crews aren't refusing...management is...without authorization the crews can do nothing...and the wheels are worn pretty thin....I don't think having the aged tires makes derailments more likely though...I think it only puts a lot more wear on the wheels themselves...but I could be wrong.
yourweathertodayHD 3 years ago
my Mistake. And you are right either steamtown does this or 2317 is going to end up just like 2102.
xxxDeath9572xxx 3 years ago
@yourweathertodayHD -- At some point, the tires won't meet standards for flange wear and tire thickness and will be outlawed. The biggest danger is in sharp flanges picking a switchpoint and turning everything over!
jppicur 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
damn man. if you had your camera focused on the train and NOT on the mountains you would have got the derailment on tape. dumbass.
chikenpicken123 3 years ago
easy. not everyone catches everything. its not like we anticipate a derailment
yourweathertodayHD 3 years ago 3
I agree, but ya neva know what will happen.
not name calling.
BarryManilowFan4eva 3 years ago
Not too long ago, SP&S #700, and SP #4449 ran aground in Oregon while running a Christmas Train. It took them I belive 3 days to get both steamers back on the rails.
TVRM610 3 years ago
Whoah! On CPR 2317 on the ground!
csxES44DC 3 years ago
Ooops! Love the Boxcar Willie song!
GP9railfan 3 years ago
hey it coulda been worse
pengapop12 3 years ago 3
What happened?
I'd expect rail to spread under the greater weight of the locomotive, not the tender.
Was rail not properly secured to ties?
Weak or rotted ties?
Thank you.
robertgift 3 years ago
Ya that really stinks. Things like that give steam railroading VERY bad publicity. At least this didnt happen to 3254
3254man 3 years ago
wow that stinks! Track inspector should be fired.
You bring a pretty old girl like that out for a walk and it's like her pants fell down on main street.
Thanks for posting
420glass 3 years ago 3
Whoops!!!
SeniorMinch229018 3 years ago
GREAT VIDEO!!!
TommyBNSF 3 years ago
DAYM. I love that engine. Rather unfortunate.
DarkTower97 3 years ago
I was on that ride!
Steamtown to Portland cutout, well at lest that was the plan.
Quite a mess. We were only going about 5 MPH when it happened, good thing else would have been much worse.
Tim
mandmengineer 4 years ago
I forgot that happened.
jimbo2317 4 years ago
Nice Victory Red Avalanche. Great color choice.
Bonegrl 4 years ago
That sucks. Do they know how it happened?
mafarnz 4 years ago
from what i heard poor track matinence
mikes47jeep 4 years ago
Wow, can't believe this actually happened.
CSX6000 4 years ago