Added: 3 years ago
From: NintendoVampire
Views: 14,631
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (43)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Very cool...very SMOKIN!!

    GT40's are always welcomed on SmokinStangs dotcom, as well as at the SmokinStangs Laconia - Mustang Rally.

    Additional details on the Mustang Rally in Laconia, NH:

    smokinstangslaconia dotcom

  • dude this is my hometown, awesome.

  • This is my Superformance GT40 Mark II replica.

    It has a Roush 427 with 511 HP, and a RBT 5-speed transaxle.

    Superformance made an agreement with the company who owns the 'GT40' trademark to call their GT40's 'Continuation' vehicles; implying that they are in some fashion connected to the originals, continuing in production.

    The Superformance GT40 is 90 percent interchangeable with the originals.

    You can see more of this GT40 at wheelerwebs com backslash gt40.

  • That was my uncle driving his gt40

  • @NCFIREFIGHTER831

    This is my Superformance GT40 Mark II replica.

    It has a Roush 427 with 511 HP, and a RBT 5-speed transaxle.

    Superformance made an agreement with the company who owns the 'GT40' trademark to call their GT40's 'Continuation' vehicles; implying that they are in some fashion connected to the originals, continuing in production.

    The Superformance GT40 is 90 percent interchangeable with the originals.

    You can see more of this GT40 at .

  • thats a nice mk II replica

  • lucky guy

  • kenny logins ?? wtf !!! a disgrace to a legendary car

  • Probably a superformance continuation car, and I think it's a MK4 model, with a ford 427 big block. There again, being where it was seen, it could also be an ERA replica, if they make the MK4. If it's set up anything like the original, it could be a real animal to drive at speed, the big block cars were monsters.

  • Comment removed

  • Guys I believe its a replicar, with a very wrongly shaped ass end

  • @12salem - go and look at the GT40 photos of the 66 Le Mans winners. The 66 car like the one in the video had a different rear end to the more well known 68 & 69 winners style rear end that most folks are familiar with.

  • @LiamXaoh I see what you mean about the MK II, still though that car just doesnt look right, the front fog lights also look odd. Im no expert and have only seen a handfull of real gt40s in shows so who knows, as I said it just looks a bit odd to me.

  • @LiamXaoh  That car also looks a little tall, taller than 40

  • @12salem - I like the older original style (the 68/69 Le Mans winner) - they look less fussy and far more elegant. When people build a replica I assume they grab a bag of features they like (or what the salesmen tells them are the go) and buy it. The Mk II was a beast of a car with 7 litres and a lot more weight than the Mk1. Some builders of replicas also put on much larger diameter wheels and low profile tires which also destroys the looks a bit. Each to his own though.

  • @LiamXaoh This car, if a Superformance version, is so accurate that it is considered to be a continuation of the originals. It isn't just a kit car replica.

    The 'older' versions are also the '66 and '67 years, the '68 and '69 years are the last 2 years the cars were produced.

  • @elijah5674 - I'm not sure what point you're trying to make. I said "older original style" as the 68/89 versions predate the 66/67 in the body style. There is a huge difference between "older" and "older original style".

  • Kit car you dumb redneck

  • that's sooo not a GT40... hate replicas!! what's more, it's really bad replica - it doesn't realy like so similar... :(

  • @filaroom - actually it looks a lot like the original GT40's that swep the Le Mans

  • @filaroom your an idot, no offense. these replicas are approved by Carroll Shelby, and i take his word over yours!

  • Why the crappy music in an otherwise interesting video?

  • @svtcontour LOL.

  • That's one bad ass machine. I would've followed the guy until he stopped somewhere and asked him to go for a ride in it. I saw a red and white Ford GT in a bookstore parking lot. I parked next to it and got out and asked the driver if he would take me for a ride and he did.

  • Do these really have a 427 in them?

  • Um, I know for sure the MkIIa's had the 427..

  • fucking hilarious. I was just browsing the vids and found this. I live like 5 mins away from this spot.

  • That's cool. I live not far from there, either.

  • Fucking... AWESOME!

  • beasty car man............

  • yep this is not an original its a Superformance replica.

  • i cant believe this is a 1966 car, it looks like a 1990 supercar!!!

  • dude that's sick!

  • Whatever it is, Al Gore and his disciples hate it.

  • Left hand drive gives it away. MkII Superformance GT40 replica with Roush engine. 90 per cent of the parts are interchangeble with the original.

  • Thats a replica the originals are not street legal

  • A real 1966-1967 Mk.II WOULD be legal.

    1968 begins the death spiral to 1973.

    A GT-40 Mk.I (#1043) went for $1.6

  • It's a superformance replica

  • the front end, headlights give it away

  • it be hard to tell if it was a real one to a replica. A real one, especially this MKII would be worth up to $1m. Id most likely say this is a wll done replica, great car tho

  • O_O beautiful

  • Details point to the being a 7 litre Mk.II....

    J.C.

  • i love ford.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more