Hideki Mutoh Crash at Long Beach

[ToroRosso20]

In F1 you finish where you start.

On Oval racing you have room to go side by side and race. On road courses means follow the leader.

[SportsfanDude161292]

lol, whatever you say, because ovals are really too easy to pass, like the indy500 and the, under the lights of texas speedway

[DaszekPL]

Ovals are really boring but I'd want to see one oval track F1 Grand Prix.

[DaszekPL]

Coz there are no Americans inside? Wait for USF1 Team in season 2009.

[embassyhill]

Maybe driving on an oval is boring but IMO oval races are really interesting (and I'm European :D).

[watchika]

That's what makes it good, ovals are too easy to pass on.

[watchika]

More like more road courses.

[lasersailor587]

AGR needs to get rid of Muhto hes never lead let alone win at st. pete three crashes because of him until he crashed his own car

[CGFootball5307]

c'mon how do you really feel

[stardustfull01]

今年も期待できねえな

ヘタクソ

[DJK83]

OK, I just don't understand why these videos aren't de-interlaced. In fact, the need for that could be eliminated entirely, while preserving the full resolution, by simply converting the raw, progressively scanned video to 30 fps for use on the internet. Do those in charge of this 'official' channel not have access to that?

But regardless, the "comb effect" is a COMPLETELY unnecessary problem. I mean, I'm sorry to complain, but these could be great videos if they were just produced properly.

[proplayer609]

I personally wish that Versus didnt use 1080i on their HD channel

[indycars]

DJK83- I do de-interlace and I do do these at 30fps...But something happens in the upload and conversion to You Tube. I put the exact same video on ITunes and do not get the "comb" effect. Just to let you you know that I see the same thing when I watch them and I am working on the situation.

[DJK83]

Oh, that's really odd. Is there any way you COULD just start with the raw, progressively scanned video, to completely avoid having to de-interlace? That would be better anyway, since each frame has lost half it's resolution by being interlaced. De-interlacing it fixes the "comb effect", but the quality is still permanently degraded.

I mean, I don't know exactly how much you have access to, but working with footage AFTER it's been interlaced for TV is a bad idea for numerous reasons.

[indycars]

We use 1080i from the start....But I am trying my hardest.....

[DJK83]

Okay, well good luck figuring out this bizarre problem.

[creaturevent]

@DJK83 lol fuckin goon who gives a shit its youtube

[DJK83]

@creaturevent Uhh, are you being serious? It's pretty common knowledge that deinterlacing is a VERY important part of posting web videos.

As for it "only" being YouTube, again, are you being serious? It's 2011, and YouTube goes so far as to support 4k now. Video quality DOES matter, especially on an "official" channel like this one. Thus, complaining that one of the most basic aspects of video editing was overlooked is perfectly reasonable.

[UltimateEEnEFan]

He hit that wall a ton. Hope he's ok.

[cmcgato2]

like Tracy's crash @ 2007

[Stenoo201]

big!!!!!!!!