Mileage matters, but so does price. How much $ is it?
madtownband 5 months ago
the only reason to get this is if u want a high driving position, if you dont care get the cts wagon
gilljames10 8 months ago
Great car, but maan those cargo nets on the back of front seats look cheap.
themostoriginaluser 1 year ago
@themostoriginaluser they arent really cheap if you see them/feel them in person
mtdew123456789 1 year ago
does this thing drive good??? ive been hearing mixed reviews about the way it drives, and im thinkin of buying the FWD 3.0L version.... hmmm
iminlov3 1 year ago
@iminlov3 Go to the dealer and test drive the SRX and the CTS Wagon, back-to-back ... ;)
mpgomatic 1 year ago
@mpgomatic is the difference between the turbo really worth the upgrade?
@iminlov3 You gotta drive 'em both, look at your wallet, and decide for yourself.
this is the best review for the srx 2010 for now. It was very helpful and informative.
thank you
Jappotea 2 years ago 3
Reminds me of a Pacifica.
KillerJerseys 2 years ago
ew...
Hail2TheVictorsBaby 2 years ago
@KillerJerseys yea but the pacifica is a little ugly
caddy095 1 year ago
I don't like the interior. It looks so dry and cold in black... I like the volvo XC60 and Q5 much better!!
Waffleater1 2 years ago
I'm so confused- why does everyone keep talking of this 2.8 when I can't find it on Cadillac's website (or any other) or the EPA's site?
bg1379 2 years ago
the 2.8 hasn't launched yet last time I checked, supposed to be available later in the model year
mercmilan06 2 years ago
Everyone has been talking matter-of-factly about it for some time now which had really confused me, but I guess it remains a lot of speculation.
well it's a Saab engine and I guess for some reason or another it's not ready for production just quite yet
GM is putting a 3.0 V6 in the SRX but you can opt for a 2.8 Turbo V6 if you choose.
parsley0120 2 years ago
Sorry posted my comment before they video started so you obviously knew that lol
This is like a car with a computer built into it, it has the latest technologoy lol..
Emzieroy 2 years ago
did you like the turn signal indicator?
bajabusta 2 years ago
Wonder how this compares to the Mercedes GLK class.
Forgoten214 2 years ago
Forget both! :D get the Audi q5 or Volvo XC60. The Glk doesn't look or feel like a typical Mercedes-Benz though.
quatlen 2 years ago
Really? I dont know about Audi. They have nice interiors and a smooth ride but I hear they are high maintenance. Not that good in the reliability part.
Volvo, I dont know much about Volvos except that they are considered one of the best for safety.
Wow I dont know if youve driven a new c class dan but that speedometer is taken directly from it.
flatblackstrat 2 years ago
Speaking of expenses. You should post the price of the vehicle you review.
gunzkevin 2 years ago 10
must be EXPENSIVE
taltigolt 2 years ago
Mileage matters, but so does price. How much $ is it?
madtownband 5 months ago
the only reason to get this is if u want a high driving position, if you dont care get the cts wagon
gilljames10 8 months ago
Great car, but maan those cargo nets on the back of front seats look cheap.
themostoriginaluser 1 year ago
@themostoriginaluser they arent really cheap if you see them/feel them in person
mtdew123456789 1 year ago
does this thing drive good??? ive been hearing mixed reviews about the way it drives, and im thinkin of buying the FWD 3.0L version.... hmmm
iminlov3 1 year ago
@iminlov3 Go to the dealer and test drive the SRX and the CTS Wagon, back-to-back ... ;)
mpgomatic 1 year ago
@mpgomatic is the difference between the turbo really worth the upgrade?
iminlov3 1 year ago
@iminlov3 You gotta drive 'em both, look at your wallet, and decide for yourself.
mpgomatic 1 year ago
this is the best review for the srx 2010 for now. It was very helpful and informative.
thank you
Jappotea 2 years ago 3
Reminds me of a Pacifica.
KillerJerseys 2 years ago
ew...
Hail2TheVictorsBaby 2 years ago
@KillerJerseys yea but the pacifica is a little ugly
caddy095 1 year ago
I don't like the interior. It looks so dry and cold in black... I like the volvo XC60 and Q5 much better!!
Waffleater1 2 years ago
I'm so confused- why does everyone keep talking of this 2.8 when I can't find it on Cadillac's website (or any other) or the EPA's site?
bg1379 2 years ago
the 2.8 hasn't launched yet last time I checked, supposed to be available later in the model year
mercmilan06 2 years ago
Everyone has been talking matter-of-factly about it for some time now which had really confused me, but I guess it remains a lot of speculation.
bg1379 2 years ago
well it's a Saab engine and I guess for some reason or another it's not ready for production just quite yet
mercmilan06 2 years ago
GM is putting a 3.0 V6 in the SRX but you can opt for a 2.8 Turbo V6 if you choose.
parsley0120 2 years ago
Sorry posted my comment before they video started so you obviously knew that lol
parsley0120 2 years ago
This is like a car with a computer built into it, it has the latest technologoy lol..
Emzieroy 2 years ago
did you like the turn signal indicator?
bajabusta 2 years ago
Wonder how this compares to the Mercedes GLK class.
Forgoten214 2 years ago
Forget both! :D get the Audi q5 or Volvo XC60. The Glk doesn't look or feel like a typical Mercedes-Benz though.
quatlen 2 years ago
Really? I dont know about Audi. They have nice interiors and a smooth ride but I hear they are high maintenance. Not that good in the reliability part.
Volvo, I dont know much about Volvos except that they are considered one of the best for safety.
Forgoten214 2 years ago
Wow I dont know if youve driven a new c class dan but that speedometer is taken directly from it.
flatblackstrat 2 years ago
Speaking of expenses. You should post the price of the vehicle you review.
gunzkevin 2 years ago 10
must be EXPENSIVE
taltigolt 2 years ago