I'm pissed that I took Differential Equations last semester and I'm still lost on this.
Sweet Clyde did this problem with skipping like 10 steps, he didn't even have to draw the wronskian determinate for these functions smh ugh these globetrotters are amazing
That equation is simply the intersection in the plane between a circle centered in the origin of radius 1 and an equilateral hyperbola, not centered in the origin, with asymptotes parallel to the x and y axis respectively. This is a high school problem. Can't see what are they referring to when speaking about differential equations
@H1TMANactual Why not? If you have been actively studying maths who's to say that you couldn't be at that level of understanding by 18? Math is hard, but like anything else, with practice you get better at it.
@MacacoPulando It's pretty obvious from his answer that he is bluffing. Sure there are exceptions, but it's very unlikely an 18 year old can do Differential equations. Cal 2 is a pre-req just to get into DE.
@H1TMANactual Eh, I've just turned 17 and I have a bit of knowledge in differential equations. I've covered calc I and calc II and am starting on calc III (admittedly this has all been self-studied). It's not outlandish to imagine that someone could have some knowledge in differential equations at age 18 at all, especially if they're interested in maths and have actively pursued their interest like I have. None of the maths is beyond the intellectual capabilities of someone less than eighteen.
That equation isn't at all complicated. I'm surprised Prof. Farnsworth couldn't figure it out. Furthermore, Sweet Clyde didn't use any calculus (as was suggested) and the answer appears far more complex than necessary, not to mention irrelevant. That said, I only noticed because I can pause Youtube, nobody would have seen that on TV.
you know shit just got real when you see a harlem globetrotter dribbling a piece of chalk on the floor and use variation of parameters to prove time travel can be done
The Futurama writers know they can get away with writing an equation with only half an equals sign (because they're doing comedy, not math) Which would be a minus sign.
@juanpedro19840914 Apparently after looking up "Greenwald Theorem," I found out that she herself helped with the skit. Just another reason why Futurama is better than all those other shows on television that pretend to sound clever or intelligent.
DO NOT TRUST ANYONE THAT USES MATHEMATICS IN THIS WAY. THEY ARE LIBERAL SATANISTS WHO ARE TRYING TO TRICK YOU INTO BELIEVING THEIR ANTI-CHRISTIAN MAGIC. DO NOT LET THEM BLIND YOU WITH SCIENCE. WORSHIP JESUS CHRIST
@KanyeTroll Hmmm, or maybe math is math. If you actually had a real education, and understand higher math, or education in general, then you can talk.
@KanyeTroll Nobody who uploads a South Park "Kanye West Gay Fish" clip to their website would be saying that with a straight face. I'm pretty sure you're being sarcastic.
OTOH: I also believe Kanye West to be the new William Shakespeare of Western civilization for the next millenium, so I might not really get sarcasm.
Lol, this is an empirical formula used to determine the "solar time" in minutes or something of the like, was quite a while i used the eq. of time! :D
N is commonly used for limits, series or product series and c might have a known relation to E. In fact all non-algebraic numbers have to be expressed in infinite converging series, take a look at pi or exp.
Note how Sweet Clyde neither uses variation of parameters nor expands a Wronskian, as Bubblegum ordered him to, neither of which has anything to do with solving a transcendental equation of this time! Further notice that Clyde's "solution" has an N and a C and a small delta in it, but no E.
@031000ron1 Nope. Never got into Oxford. I attended the Harlem Globetrotters' Institute of Fly Math and Righteous Reasoning. My doctoral advisor was Bubblegum himself.
Now,im not taking this math seriously,but lets say for a second futurama made sense.I imagine E would be an energy of some sort(its an equation of time,but energy makes the most sense),making C probably the speed of light?And if we have a linear comb. of sin and cos I guess N would come from a sum over N(maybe fourier series).I've no idea what delta would be...
This is exactly what the writers were hoping for wasnt it? A deep discussion about something that makes absolutely no sense:P
@mphello Golly! If I didn't know better, I'd say this whole thing was nothing more than a work of fiction done for the sake of comedic farce yet designed to give nods to legitimate scientific principles in the process!
Transcendental equations like that ARE solvable. It's called the Lagrange Inversion Formula (LIF). For E = sum of sines and cosines of rational functions of B such that we know B=0 implies E=0 and assuming we're not at a critical point, the LIF will give you a Maclaurin series expansion for B in terms of E.
@mphello Haha, no, when I said "what is this?" I meant the Lagrange Inversion Formula. I don't recall going over that stuff when we covered Taylor and Maclaurin series in calc III.
I'm *fairly* certain I know enough to *maybe* be able to tell that the "E=sin(2B)" etc isn't a differential equation. (emphasis on "fairly", haha).
@sbunkboy3 You wouldn't get the LIF in any college course. It's a fairly messy formula, at least when done for several functions and several dependent and independent variables.
E=sin(3B) + cos(B) whatever -- do you see any derivatives of E with respect to B, or vice versa, appearing in this equation? Nope! That's how you know it's not a differential equation! (Or, you CAN think of it as a 0-th order differential equation.)
@mphello Ah, ok. Thanks for clearing that up for me. I was kinda afraid I might have missed something important in my earlier calc classes, haha. And yeah, I remember learning that stuff about identifying a differential equation from earlier in the course.
I should probably get back to studying though...we have a test over annihilator method, undetermined coefficients method, variation of parameters, etc tomorrow.
@sbunkboy3 Good luck with your exam! I'm sure you'll do well!
In college, I got only two C's. One was in differential equations. Ironically, I went on to higher math in grad school and now that's what I specialize in! ;)
couldn't he just integrate the function normally. It didn't look like a hard function to integrate.
concealedknight 1 week ago
These guys came to my school today.
Starbuckskat 1 week ago
There's no differential equation here...
libalchris 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
VOP and the Wronskian shouldn't even be used in this. It's not even a second order ODE.
OMFGTHISSOSUX2 3 weeks ago
I thought the finglonger was only a result of the what if machine...
cactusmolestor 1 month ago
So simple he did it in his head.
rtmcgaha 1 month ago
I'm pissed that I took Differential Equations last semester and I'm still lost on this.
Sweet Clyde did this problem with skipping like 10 steps, he didn't even have to draw the wronskian determinate for these functions smh ugh these globetrotters are amazing
Santana2163 1 month ago
i was watching educational videos for my diff eq test tomorrow before i stumbled upon this classic
MrPentatonicScale 1 month ago
Sorry, but...isn't that just nonsense?
divinesleeper 1 month ago
Hey, I'm still trying to figure out what the Greenwaldian Theorem means!
deeppurple28 1 month ago
I am very happy to see the vidoe Use variation of parameters and expand the Wronskian! from you, hopefully the others also are happy for You
NganaJHone 1 month ago
Steady I Really Like This Video Use variation of parameters and expand the Wronskian!
Ondelendo 1 month ago
Good, I like that you share this video, I wish success always Differential Equations Application (Futurama)
bebeheuy 1 month ago
Comment removed
bebeheuy 1 month ago
For the curious....
google>9.87 sin(2b)>yahoo answers
E/cos(B) = 19.74 sin(B) - 9.03
(assuming B /=pi/2 /= 3pi/2)
Crucifier61 1 month ago in playlist ODEs
a^2 +b^2 > c^2?
what is this madness? :o
wow1022 1 month ago
@wow1022 Hyperbolic coordinates?
megarockman 1 month ago
@wow1022
That is only valid for all points on a surface of positive curvature.
BYMYSYD 1 month ago
I think I need to take Calculus again...
mysterykcad 1 month ago 2
Simply put cos(b)=x, sin(b)=y, add the equation x^2+y^2=1 and expand sin(2b)=2sin(b)cos(b)=2xy
Then find the way to express the right hand side P(x-r)(y-s)-Prs
silencieuxxx 2 months ago
That equation is simply the intersection in the plane between a circle centered in the origin of radius 1 and an equilateral hyperbola, not centered in the origin, with asymptotes parallel to the x and y axis respectively. This is a high school problem. Can't see what are they referring to when speaking about differential equations
silencieuxxx 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
hey there, if you like futurama you probably like this song:) enjoy...
/watch?v=zn6seApFtfo
green20022 2 months ago
I just had a 30-minute long discussion about the validity of this scene with a few of my professors/classmates.
I REGRET NOTHING.
AntefixA 2 months ago 39
@AntefixA Really? An 18 year old can do differential equations?
H1TMANactual 1 month ago
@H1TMANactual Why not? If you have been actively studying maths who's to say that you couldn't be at that level of understanding by 18? Math is hard, but like anything else, with practice you get better at it.
MacacoPulando 1 month ago
@MacacoPulando It's pretty obvious from his answer that he is bluffing. Sure there are exceptions, but it's very unlikely an 18 year old can do Differential equations. Cal 2 is a pre-req just to get into DE.
H1TMANactual 1 month ago
@H1TMANactual Eh, I've just turned 17 and I have a bit of knowledge in differential equations. I've covered calc I and calc II and am starting on calc III (admittedly this has all been self-studied). It's not outlandish to imagine that someone could have some knowledge in differential equations at age 18 at all, especially if they're interested in maths and have actively pursued their interest like I have. None of the maths is beyond the intellectual capabilities of someone less than eighteen.
OCNmeticadpa 2 weeks ago
@H1TMANactual I did it
guerillachan20 1 week ago
@H1TMANactual it's easy esp. when ur in engineering
aljon299792458 2 weeks ago
@AntefixA What did they say?
movcrit 4 weeks ago
@AntefixA I for one salute you. HUZZAH!
Trund27 2 weeks ago
I committed an act of forbidden love once: I DATED A ROBOT!
I got a virus from it, too. The software kind, not the biological kind.
Now, when I reboot in the morning, a flood of spam gets beamed straight into my brain.
And not the software kind, but the Hormel kind.
What a sad world we live in, 3000 years from now, where a ghost and a horse can have sex, but not human and robot.
mphello 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
=that's not even a differential equation=
My life is over. I don't want to live on this planet any more.
mphello 2 months ago
I have no idea why time appears to be some general wave. Even if it was, I still have no idea how I ended up on this video
ryomali 2 months ago
That equation isn't at all complicated. I'm surprised Prof. Farnsworth couldn't figure it out. Furthermore, Sweet Clyde didn't use any calculus (as was suggested) and the answer appears far more complex than necessary, not to mention irrelevant. That said, I only noticed because I can pause Youtube, nobody would have seen that on TV.
93cian 2 months ago
you know shit just got real when you see a harlem globetrotter dribbling a piece of chalk on the floor and use variation of parameters to prove time travel can be done
animeasianman 2 months ago
I wanna finglonger. (it makes you smarter)
gredangeo 2 months ago
@gredangeo Trying to compensate for something?
SpitShineT0mmy 2 months ago
@SpitShineT0mmy Yeah, for the idiots around me. I could beat them with it.
gredangeo 2 months ago
The Globetrotters neither do math nor play basketball.
They play mathketball!
mphello 2 months ago
The Futurama writers know they can get away with writing an equation with only half an equals sign (because they're doing comedy, not math) Which would be a minus sign.
mphello 2 months ago
I love how everyone is discussing the equation LOL
pastcineo 2 months ago
@pastcineo Hey - why not? :) It's fun!
mphello 2 months ago
@mphello It seems like fun! I just wish I could take a part on it, but I don't remember most of my high school maths D:
pastcineo 2 months ago
@pastcineo Just jump in with some math mumbo-jumbo! It's Futurama!
The Professy will be proud of you.
mphello 2 months ago
........that's not even a differential equation
TopGunOriginal 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TopGunOriginal
=that's not even a differential equation=
My life is over. I don't want to live on this planet any more.
mphello 2 months ago
He should have just expanded the sin(2B) and expressed sin in terms of cos (or viceversa).. LOL
juanpedro19840914 3 months ago
a^2 + b^2 > c^2 ???
My god, I've been learning the wrong thing this whole time.
R4Y4NO 3 months ago
@R4Y4NO i think it's non-Euclidean geometry. with non-Euclidean geometry, in short, things are wonky.
Toadfish91 3 months ago
@R4Y4NO Refer to the "atached" figure.. the triangle is on a sphere. Ergo, that inecuation is true.. =P
juanpedro19840914 3 months ago
@juanpedro19840914 Apparently after looking up "Greenwald Theorem," I found out that she herself helped with the skit. Just another reason why Futurama is better than all those other shows on television that pretend to sound clever or intelligent.
SyncopatedNightmares 2 months ago
Futurama:
The result of the writers having mathematics degrees. Isn't it fucking awesome?
TheNamelessCharacter 3 months ago
Forget the wronskian, calculate the Jakobian!
HLSDK 3 months ago
That doesn't look like a differential equation to me.
DrunkenGamingMaster 3 months ago
@DrunkenGamingMaster try to solve it then...
swunt10 3 months ago
They'll need differential equation if the sphere/circle-shaped related to the equation..
ah. i'm taking cartoon too seriously!!
fafanull 3 months ago
@fafanull THE UNIVERSE IS ROUND!
031000ron1 3 months ago
lol this isnt a differential equation, so i was like lmao variation of parameters or wronskian and how did he get that lol
MrBigEnchilada 3 months ago
This doesn't look like a differential equation to me, he didn't take the derivative of "9.87sin(2B)" or anything. Still funny though.
Ichiboy900 4 months ago
Well, given the Greenwaldian Theorem...
s900203 4 months ago
That is the only way something impossible would be possible : impossible people.
halafradrimx 4 months ago
what?
ImperialEarthEmpire 4 months ago
DO NOT TRUST ANYONE THAT USES MATHEMATICS IN THIS WAY. THEY ARE LIBERAL SATANISTS WHO ARE TRYING TO TRICK YOU INTO BELIEVING THEIR ANTI-CHRISTIAN MAGIC. DO NOT LET THEM BLIND YOU WITH SCIENCE. WORSHIP JESUS CHRIST
KanyeTroll 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@KanyeTroll
You are completely full of shit.
kiyotewolf 4 months ago 2
@KanyeTroll Hmmm, or maybe math is math. If you actually had a real education, and understand higher math, or education in general, then you can talk.
jgpingpong 4 months ago
@KanyeTroll Nobody who uploads a South Park "Kanye West Gay Fish" clip to their website would be saying that with a straight face. I'm pretty sure you're being sarcastic.
OTOH: I also believe Kanye West to be the new William Shakespeare of Western civilization for the next millenium, so I might not really get sarcasm.
mphello 4 months ago
@KanyeTroll *facepalm*
DammitSpah 3 months ago
Haha VOP sucks! I'm glad I'm done with that class.
fingerboy18 4 months ago
This made my day :D
Galidorquest 4 months ago
We've got dem numbers o_O?
Eggzore 5 months ago
All that is junk. You all know the Globetrotters same the real calculus for the end of the game.
kirant 5 months ago
I knew I should have checked your show-boating Globetrotter algebra!
yaosio 5 months ago
a smart comedy! doesn't happen too often
rich763690 6 months ago
Lol, this is an empirical formula used to determine the "solar time" in minutes or something of the like, was quite a while i used the eq. of time! :D
Metalguden 6 months ago
The Finglonger!!!
jamo0007 6 months ago 45
I love the globe trotters in futurama
ShadowGricken 6 months ago
N is commonly used for limits, series or product series and c might have a known relation to E. In fact all non-algebraic numbers have to be expressed in infinite converging series, take a look at pi or exp.
FundamentalPhysicist 6 months ago
Note how Sweet Clyde neither uses variation of parameters nor expands a Wronskian, as Bubblegum ordered him to, neither of which has anything to do with solving a transcendental equation of this time! Further notice that Clyde's "solution" has an N and a C and a small delta in it, but no E.
But that's just my razzle dazzle.
mphello 6 months ago 126
@mphello lmao epic comment
MrLindenson 4 months ago
@mphello Wnt to oxford did you?
031000ron1 3 months ago
@031000ron1 Nope. Never got into Oxford. I attended the Harlem Globetrotters' Institute of Fly Math and Righteous Reasoning. My doctoral advisor was Bubblegum himself.
mphello 3 months ago 35
@mphello You. ARE. AWESOME!
031000ron1 3 months ago
@031000ron1
Thanks! :)
mphello 3 months ago
@mphello Your razzle dazzle welcome.
031000ron1 3 months ago
@mphello Woah....
Trund27 2 weeks ago
@mphello
woahman u are sooooooo smart for correcting a cartoon. good job bro
MuNkYhEaD15 3 months ago
@MuNkYhEaD15
But that's what adds to the humor: taking the so-called "math" in a funny cartoon like Futurama
seriously, to see how far it will go! :)
mphello 3 months ago
@mphello
Very true, I now see the value. I apologize :)
MuNkYhEaD15 3 months ago
@mphello
Now,im not taking this math seriously,but lets say for a second futurama made sense.I imagine E would be an energy of some sort(its an equation of time,but energy makes the most sense),making C probably the speed of light?And if we have a linear comb. of sin and cos I guess N would come from a sum over N(maybe fourier series).I've no idea what delta would be...
This is exactly what the writers were hoping for wasnt it? A deep discussion about something that makes absolutely no sense:P
Wicked33 3 months ago
@mphello Golly! If I didn't know better, I'd say this whole thing was nothing more than a work of fiction done for the sake of comedic farce yet designed to give nods to legitimate scientific principles in the process!
...NAH...
=3
EXRazeBurn 2 months ago
@mphello Lol. That wasnt even a Differential Equation
Ayplus 2 months ago
Tall african alien basketball playing scientists?? I'm in.
BaxterXenon 6 months ago 3
the fing-longer :D
ThePat0307 7 months ago
Forget the math, how the hell were they bouncing chalk?!
cosmicmelon 7 months ago 2
Love how in this Future the Globetrotters are esencially the highest form of human being in the universe. XD
troggdorthesecond 7 months ago 2
Transcendental equations like that ARE solvable. It's called the Lagrange Inversion Formula (LIF). For E = sum of sines and cosines of rational functions of B such that we know B=0 implies E=0 and assuming we're not at a critical point, the LIF will give you a Maclaurin series expansion for B in terms of E.
Or did I just spoil the professy's fun?
mphello 7 months ago 3
@mphello
Show-off :p
WSWarthog 7 months ago
@mphello How about you explain that in terms we can understand?
billythepancake 7 months ago
@mphello I'm taking a differential equations class, and what is this? :)
sbunkboy3 6 months ago
@sbunkboy3 Not sure. Looks made up. You mean the E = sin(2B) + c*cos(B) etc equation, right?
Well, it's not a differential equation, first of all, in case you were thinking that.
mphello 6 months ago
@mphello Haha, no, when I said "what is this?" I meant the Lagrange Inversion Formula. I don't recall going over that stuff when we covered Taylor and Maclaurin series in calc III.
I'm *fairly* certain I know enough to *maybe* be able to tell that the "E=sin(2B)" etc isn't a differential equation. (emphasis on "fairly", haha).
sbunkboy3 6 months ago
@sbunkboy3 You wouldn't get the LIF in any college course. It's a fairly messy formula, at least when done for several functions and several dependent and independent variables.
E=sin(3B) + cos(B) whatever -- do you see any derivatives of E with respect to B, or vice versa, appearing in this equation? Nope! That's how you know it's not a differential equation! (Or, you CAN think of it as a 0-th order differential equation.)
mphello 6 months ago
@mphello Ah, ok. Thanks for clearing that up for me. I was kinda afraid I might have missed something important in my earlier calc classes, haha. And yeah, I remember learning that stuff about identifying a differential equation from earlier in the course.
I should probably get back to studying though...we have a test over annihilator method, undetermined coefficients method, variation of parameters, etc tomorrow.
sbunkboy3 6 months ago
@sbunkboy3 Good luck with your exam! I'm sure you'll do well!
In college, I got only two C's. One was in differential equations. Ironically, I went on to higher math in grad school and now that's what I specialize in! ;)
mphello 6 months ago
@mphello,
One of the great things about math and research science is that a lot of people who get mediocre grades at first end up excelling in the fields.
MegaAstrodude 5 months ago
black pepole knows everything
superfanboy555 7 months ago 6
I wonder as to their opinion on Novakov's self-consistency principle?
Baryon321 7 months ago
lol *2* press '2' after clicking video
mi9worm 7 months ago
Comment removed
mi9worm 7 months ago
But those equations are all razzmatazz anyway!
PlankofWood1 7 months ago 2
Q to the E to the D
tomryan2580 7 months ago
And they say math has no real world uses!
Mattoxz 8 months ago 6
Looks like the Professor ended up intending the Fing-Longer after all. I guess he was happy with what the What If Machine showed him
FrostdPoptart 8 months ago 3
I believe this paradoxicality equation to be unso---ALL GLORY TO THE HYPNOTOAD
Dxthegod 8 months ago
devide futurama with zero and we lost teh world
killingdj0 8 months ago
this is not a DE... snif
h0wud0in2 8 months ago
that's not a differential equation, if it were it would have a dE/dt or dE/dB in it.
aj19bcx 8 months ago
holy crap. They dribble chalk!!!!! .o.
GreyMatter00Duh 8 months ago
That 1 dislike is from the person who still thinks the equation is unsolvable :/
heronoki 8 months ago
WOW black people are smart and awesome
i miss the 70
mma4ever100 8 months ago
@mma4ever100 Was that sarcasm?
Varoonmg 8 months ago
@Varoonmg no
mma4ever100 8 months ago
@mma4ever100 Great Then
Well Black People , like any other People, are smart I guess....
It's just that they are usually best known for their proficiency in Sports including Basketball than in Maths...
I even wonder why Futurama put that up, because even for many non-racists, Black Basketball players excelling in Maths might have seen weird...
Varoonmg 7 months ago
Basketball ain't what it used to be anymore :P
tH3sUbL1m1nALn33d 8 months ago
a square + b square > c square :DDD
marciuzzzxxx 8 months ago
"Right on."
Good lord Futurama has some of the funniest things ever.
clapton1958 9 months ago
Every first letter in your title spell deaf
LOL
kgkingchong 9 months ago
The finglonger!
chocofrisbees 9 months ago
Makes about as much sense as anything else I heard in calculus
freakyanimegal8 9 months ago
What's the jingle they're whistling?
valewiki 9 months ago
@valewiki "Sweet Georgia Brown" which is also the Harlem Globe Trotter theme song.
ThatBookWorm 9 months ago
@ThatBookWorm Thanks!
valewiki 9 months ago
what's wrong with the professor's finger?
viridismonasteriense 9 months ago
@viridismonasteriense It's the "Fing-longer", but I think it's better in italian, "il lungo arnese", literally "the thing along" XD
valewiki 9 months ago
*tries to solve problem* FUCK IT LETS BLOW SHIT UP OKAY???
thevashfan12392 9 months ago
Looks pretty damn solveable to me
Exzodist 9 months ago
I always laugh at this episode because you don't expect basketball players to be super geniuses lol.
MisterJonesification 9 months ago
@MisterJonesification Yeah, I didn't expect it because they were "basketball players" either, yeah that's my reason...
MyChemicalBromance 9 months ago
@MyChemicalBromance Because "that" didn't surprise you too?....
I mean that's not where they usually excel, so I think anyone can legitimately be surprised...without being termed a "racist"....
Had they been East Asians, it would have been different
Varoonmg 7 months ago
SUCK IT PHYSICS! :D
freakyanimegal8 10 months ago
trolololol
thePURPLEdinosaur00 10 months ago
basketball players, i salute you. Maybe Kobe could do my math homework.
concealedknight 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Futurama > Simpsons > South Park = Family Guy = American Dad > the Cleveland Show > King of the Hill
darexinfinity 10 months ago
HAHA! A^2 + B^2 > C^2
that made my day!
lazylank 10 months ago
@lazylank it is possible on a non-euclidian plane like a sphere, like the one drawn right next to your formula.
mithrandir1988 9 months ago
@lazylank That's an actual equation. It applies on certain objects, like spheres.
OniLinkPlus 7 months ago
@OniLinkPlus You know what, it was funnier when I thought it was a joke...
lazylank 7 months ago
Futurama divided by zero equals 42!!
lulle103 10 months ago
Thanks to a group of basketball playing African Americans, we can time travel?
THATS FUCKING AWESOME.
CPTHAP 11 months ago 17
@CPTHAP Actually they are from a different planet. Therefore, they arent africans or americans.
superfreegoat 4 months ago
hah, Greenwaldian Theorem
xScuzzleButtx 11 months ago
Futurama = Classic Simpsons = King of the Hill > South Park > Family Guy > shitty new Simpsons > American Dad > the Cleveland Show
oisinallen 11 months ago
@oisinallen Finally someone not completely obscessed with family guy, altough i dont care much for King of the Hill
xScuzzleButtx 11 months ago
@oisinallen Actually take that back, i agree with chaoswarlord565
xScuzzleButtx 11 months ago
@xScuzzleButtx Personally I really like KotH, but I can see why people don't, since it's a different kind of comedy to the other shows.
But even if you don't like King of the Hill; I really don't think it's fair to say it's worse than American Dad or Family Guy.
oisinallen 11 months ago
OMG, its the finglonger!
kakashi1578 1 year ago 5
South Park = Futuraama = Simpsons > Family guy >> American Dad > King of the hill.
chaoswarlord565 1 year ago
@chaoswarlord565 I agree with you
xScuzzleButtx 11 months ago
he invented the fing-longer!!!!
4at4ish 1 year ago
haha that's not even a differential equation
Breaker595 1 year ago 2
was he dribbling with the chalk?
Scathe8000 1 year ago
Sheas, baby!
Nikifuj908 1 year ago
Awesome. This is a huge joke in my differential equations class :)
SkaterK3 1 year ago
And that's also how we solved the who came first the chicken or the egg
Laprocasi 1 year ago
I just noticed (after watching this video twice) that the pointer is actually his finger
whynotanyting 1 year ago
so paradox free time travel is posible after all!!!
Zee96969696 1 year ago
i have a test on variation of parameters tomorrow and this didnt really help me
Rastaman12122020 1 year ago 13
Hey, wait a sec... if it's a differential equation, where's the derivatives? xD
TheDireAvenger 1 year ago 5
@TheDireAvenger
let y=-sin(B)
y'=-cos(B)
y''=sin(B)
which would to
E=9.87y''+7.53y'+1.5y
But it doesn't because of the 2B in the first term.
The 2B in the first term is what makes it kinda weird for me, and i bet that's why farnsworth thought it was unsolvable.
allanduh 1 year ago 3
@allanduh you just have to apply a double-angle identity to sin(2B) to get 2sinBcosB
RPBiohazard 11 months ago
@RPBiohazard But that doesn't make it any easier to solve because then it becomes
E=19.74y"y'+7.53y'+1.5y
How would you solve that?
Hm, does this even need to be treated as a DiffEq?
jupigare 9 months ago