THIS IS CHRISTINE TRYING TO REMAIN IN THE CLOSET ABOUT HATING GAYS. You cant sit on the fence Christine, stand by your beliefs and answer the questions like an adult
Christine O'Donnell is a Virgo. And every Virgo- down to the last one of them- is a prudish, conservative, mealy-mouthed asshole. Every single person who just absolutely SUCKS as a human being- Bill O'Reilly, Maggie Gallagher, etc, etc, etc- ALL of them Virgos. The shittiest sign in all of Astrology...
well done piers morgan for staying on topic and not moving on. It shows her up for the sleazy, homophobe that she is. If she has views that are anti-gay - which she clearly does - then she should have to face up to them on national television. Why should she get to choose the questions he asks her?
Look at the smug smile on Christine O'Donell's face. She swells with visible pride as she dodges this crucial question and argues with Piers. She acts like a teenager fighting with a parent. She clearly tries to change the subject and obviously didn't want to answer the question. This tell me and other Americans a lot about Christine O'Donelle's attitude toward diversity and morals as both a human being and politician. I have now have mad respect for Piers. Obviously I can't say the same about
NUTCASE!.. - pandering to Low IQ-voters ..- and expecting special treatment ! WHY ? - Taliban legislated –‘one religion’s fanaticism’- against the majority:.. pro-death penalty, anti-drug, anti-gay, anti-abortion, etc. = Repub./consrv. - politicians/media whores/relig-hypocrites And claim they do not legislate morality – do not, do ‘-social engineering’- !!! = American Taliban Engineering ....
If you come to an interview, be prepared to answer questions. You can't pick and choose which you'd like to have asked and which you'd rather not be brought up. Either way, he does, in fact, stay on topic. I see no wrong in asking about the book SHE wrote and views of issues covered within it.
Walking off Piers' show because she didn't want to answer a question about what she wrote in a book she's hawking. Just goes to show, if O'Donnell can't control what an interviewer can or can't ask, or she'll walk. No loss, she's a self-absorbed idiot., as far as I'm concerned, I personally care less what she has to say anyway. With hope other news orgs won't invite her to appear on their programs. So, she doomed to appear only on Un-Fair and Un-Balanced Fox News.
@TylerNull Secondly, you are mistaken - we discriminate against both reparative therapy and those that advertise reparative therapy (many of which claim to be "Ex-gay", deluded and oppressed by hateful propaganda - many taking their own lives shortly after "treatment" without being "outed", as you claim).
Lastly, the term "outed" defines a member of the (mostly) heterosexual community forcing a Gay out of the closet - such as the case of Tyler Clementi. It is rare for the "outer" to be gay.
@TylerNull "Homophobic", as a term, is the exact same as that of the terms "Racist", "Sexist" etc. They were ALL invented by, as you call them, "activist brats" to define people so stuck in the past that they can't contemplate people veering from the socially accepted norm. Plus, the fact that pretty much every word in any language is, by logic, man-made does little but to ruin what point you have - it's called civilisation. Words are created to communicate and represent aspects of life.
"If they're only oppressed when they are outed, then who's doing the oppression?"
Those who outed them.
Was that REALLY such a brain teaser? Anyway, keep blaming the 90% of your countrymen -- "terrorists", as you call us -- who think government debt and deficit spending are too big.
Clearly, that's all about the latest whims of rich, white, spoiled brat homosexual activists and their last few dozen "Life Partners". LOL.
*facedesk* After I misread the definition of "analogy" from earlier, I was a tad confused by your most recent comment. After re-reading it, to simplify (correct me if I'm wrong), you compare homosexuality to 1) Hunting fellow Humans (of which the comparison I cannot grasp) and 2) In your second post, "same liberty to marry as any other pervert OR normal person", you compare it to being perverse in some way.
I'd argue, but first wish to clarify if I'm correct in my understanding.
Christine O'Donnell writes a book. Then she doesn't want to talk about what she wrote in the book. Do you know that as a public figure, you will have to answer difficult questions. As I watch Piers, I wonder where the sexual harassment comes in? NEVER have I seen an interview where YOU get to choose what is asked by a reporter or talk show host. Really? Come on... don't think you are going to sell books this way...As Forrest Gump says, "Stupid is is Stupid does." C. Odonnell hang it up!
A same-sex marriage license is as nonsensical as a same-species hunting license.
And just because the state won't grant you a duck hunting license to hunt Boy Scouts doesn't mean anyone is trampling on your liberties.
Spoiled brat Leftists pose as victims whilst going on jihad against Western culture. Their mindless slogans are recited, unquestioned by the ideological monolith of media, until everyone repeats their nonsense as if it's something sane.
@TylerNull I'd honestly love to hear your belief of how you believe it is both nonsensical, and comparable to hunting. In my eyes, it's no more absurd than the concept of heterosexual marriage - some man-made "divine" bond in the name of some "Holy Being/God". The main reason people in the same-sex community actually give a damn about marriage is the 1100+ rights that come with it.
Also, you seem to be confusing Leftists with Extreme Rightists when you discuss "mindless slogans [...] recited".
It's a bit creepy to consider so many are unable to grasp the concept of an analogy, assuming their stupor is real, so I'll consider their confusion's due to its relevance. Honestly.
And you needn't convince me those Leftists pretending to suddenly adore the institution of marriage are after it only for the gov't perks.
Your last bit was a valid argument to abolish the nest of social engineering laws, not to redefine marriage at the whim of spoiled brats.
@TylerNull Lastly, and finally, I would love to ask how the leftist ideology is, in any way, not "sane". You wouldn't want to be treated like a pile of crap, nor would anyone else (be it gays, racial minorities, women etc.). What part of introducing laws to prevent these people being treated like crap would be seen as insane, I ask? What part of "We are all Human" and "Follow yer own damned Golden Rule that yer preach" is so difficult to understand, hard to grasp or absurd to believe?
What part of the analogy thereof did you truly not grasp? Oh, that's right, its the very CONCEPT of an analogy that confused you. That's okay, I'm here to help:
The only people infringing on the liberty of homosexuals to marry are the homo-activists who boastfully OUT them, devastating their wives & children, all for political gain.
Ironically, that's also how we know for certain that homosexuals enjoy and exercise the very same liberty to marry as any other pervert OR normal person.
@TylerNull Your use of advanced linguistics to back up your point and make me appear uneducated fails to impress me. I'd like you to keep in mind that, whilst I am an A-Level student, I'm only beginning to study English Language next year - thus, I assume I'll learn about such techniques at that point.
@TylerNull Regardless, to dismiss the constant homophobic attacks such as that of Christine O'Donnell and claim we are impeaching on our own rights, more than anything else, is, quite frankly, laughable (or was that statement "sarcasm"?).
The LGBT community, if "outing" anyone (regardless of which, is almost always frowned upon by the community itself), chooses only to out anti-gay Politicians for, as you say, a political advantage - pointing out their hypocrisy.
The laughable claim here is that of "homophobic" -- a meaningless term invented by activist brats trying to sound technical.
The historical record of homosexual activists intimidating and otherwise discriminating against homosexual men who marry is a bit more than a "claim", mine or anyone else's.
And it's not exactly a state secret. The homosexual activists do so with pride & gaiety, and they do it so often they gave it a name -- "OUTED". All you did was try to defend it.
If you Leftist fringe types ever allowed reality to seep in, then you would acknowledge the fact that children raised by homosexual pairs suffer a RADICALLY higher rate of homosexuality.
Then again, that's expected when such children are forced to participate throughout their formative years in the macabre charade of denying their "mother" is, in reality, a psychotic man.
@TylerNull Look at you with your nifty symbols at the top of your comment! And I didn't mention anything about gay marriage. So now you're just being and asshole (much like Christine O'Donnell)
@TylerNull :O You've put them in the middle now! aren't you fancy. Now have fun talking politics to internet people instead of taking action in the real world. This is will get you nowhere. end of discussion.
What a load of tosh,,,,People dont become gay they are born gay ,,by your logic then why arnt all children raised by hetrosexual pairs suffer "RADICALLY higher rate of hetrosexuality ? the facts are they dont ,,,,
Its nothing to do with leftist or whatever ,,its reality ,,,,
Really ?Please enlighten me as to how a person "becomes gay" by living with a gay couple ?Again I say ,,with your logic then EVERY child brought up by a hetrosexual couple wilI become hetrosexual,which is clearly NOT the case.Perhaps you should open your mind to reeality and facts
Speaking of "open your mind to reality and facts", neither my answer nor the facts it referenced have changed since the last time you ignored them.
FOCUS:
Regardless of "how" an observable occurred, its occurrence remains.
Your logical failures are overshadowed by your demonstrated ignorance of what logic even is, nonetheless of when, where, or how to apply it. Your politics fit you well.
Well the facts are you failed to acknowledge my quite logical and factual reference to reality .As for my politics ,I havent mentioned my political beliefs at all .Assumptions get you no where,
@mneunbamboon " 99% of the founders of this country were secular and anti-religious" Really? Any evidence / survey? Religion & churches were a big part of this founding nation. If you do not believe me, look at all of the churches that date themselves (their lineage) for a couple hundred years.
@zzztek Lol, don't even talk to me, ignorant fuck. Go look up Thomas Jefferson quotes. Go look up Benjamin Franklin quotes. Go look up John Adams quotes. Look back to how the constitution gives up religious freedom, instead of forcing us to belong to the Church of England....use your brain. Try to make it work. Just because some of the colonial settlers of this nation were religious, doesn't mean the founders were. It's common sense. Kbye
Why is only right-wingers get pissy and walk out of interviews? I seem to remember someone doing that to Larry King for being "rude," and Tom Tancredo did it on MSNBC when Markos Moulitsas called him a chickenhawk.
These cowards should stay away from real interviews and stick to Fox.
@zzztek I watch many interviews, but I wasn't aware a "meeting" was the same thing as an interview. Please provide a link to the video for this "Speaker Nancy" thing. I'll bet there's more to it than you're suggesting (or maybe there's less).
@zzztek Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House, adjourned the House for August recess. Republicans objected and threw a tantrum.
I'll grant you Simon Rosenberg was woefully unprepared for the non-stop interruptions (at least 6) and abuse from his debate opponent, Ben Ferguson. Apparently, he forgot what year this is.
"A Democrat appears on Fox News...." does not exist. I used Google searches and looked on Examiner to try to find it. If you have an active link I'll look at it.
@EmrysImmortal She adjourned for recess when she was not getting her way. As for throwing a tantrum, the Reps stayed there and continued to discuss the agenda. Not sure how that is throwing a tantrum (in this case)..
Apparently, it is not only "right-wingers get pissy and walk out".
@zzztek Nancy Pelosi had already got her way. There was to be no vote on the item the Republicans wanted. The only thing left was to adjourn for August break.
In case you missed it, the Speaker sets the agenda. That's the rule. Republicans always think *they* set the agenda regardless of whether or not they are in charge. They threw a tantrum during a House recess. How is that Pelosi's problem? She followed the rules. Republicans didn't.
@EmrysImmortal Yes, she got her way but shutting down the discussion.
Yes, the speaker sets the agenda but a true leader would not stop discussion in the middle and "take the gavel with".
As for your partisan comment, not relevant to discussion. It is just a partisan non-sequitor.
I gave you the titles and source. YouTube hates embedded links. The video was enough to make the point that it is not just those on the right. The link you ask for only confirms again, your mistake.
@zzztek This is a partisan discussion. We both know it.
A true leader sets the agenda and then sticks to it. She did. The Republicans tried to bully her into a vote. She, being a real leader, did not let them do that.
I found the Rosenberg item and addressed that. You don't have to embed links to tell me where to find the other one. Just write it out (domain-dot-com-/-folder-/-file-dot-html). YouTube will not censor that. I do not believe that one exists. Prove it does.
@zzztek You are a partisan. You are a conservative. A conservative's definition of what a leader is and what leadership is changes depending on who is in charge.
I did not agree with your point, you never proved that. You never provided me with a link to an article you claim proves your point. That link does not exist. It is as phony as your argument. Further, I believe you know that.
WTF? O'Donnell must be stoned or stupid. Only Right wing gay haters and morons are going to buy her dumb ass book. Why not say she's anti gay marriage?
To be honest, I think if there's god above than he loves all of us because he created us, us the humankind. It's just in our hands what we make of it, nobody chooses to be gay or straight, it's just part of what you are and I think you deserve the right to love whoever you want to love whether the person is from the same gender or not. And I think it's disgusting how many people need to hide thereselves and pretend to be something they're not because our society wouldn't accept it.
Shes a dick, im a straight guy and it disgusts me when people are homophobic. People should be able to love whoever they want no matter their gender. People like Christine O'Donnell need to open their eyes a bit more to the world. As god doesnt exist fucking read up on the Hadron Collider its proving all you Bible Bashing shits wrong
@Joeybobs94 Wow, I never heard someone saying this as a man, all the people I know at least the guys I know are homophobic, you're great and I'm off the same opinion.
religion says being gay is bad. Maybe so, Im not gay , so I wouldnt know. I think the whole issue is kinda funny though. Scientists say we only use 10% of our brain. I guess discussing the importance of someones sexuality is part of the 90% group. the real issue is. for years, these assholes in media and politics use the topic to stab at each other over votes just like they use abortion. When the truth is, they dont give a flying fuck about you, your sexuality our your religious beliefs.
@DillonDee1 I think it's a tie between Perry & O'Donnell, as the other two Palin and Bachmann...... Well, I guess you're right. I can't tell who's the dumbest. It's just too hard to seperate them.
Piers is a bit rude when he asks the same question more than 5 times and she chose not to answer it. She probably could have answered it with a non-answer and they would have been done.
Hes an interviewer,,An interviewer asks people questions.Shes brought out a book ,he asked her about something she wrote in the book( her anti gay views) ,He wasnt rude at all ,he did his job ,She wanted to only wanted to interviewd on her terms ,,,,,it doesnt work that way .....it was a pathetic silly thing she did
@amadan9999 Really? Go ask your mama if Harassment is rude. Many times harassment is illegal and people get sued over it.
Are you a Piers lover or a Christine hater? Partisan people often show their ignorance in their response.
BTW, most politicians only want to be interviewed on their own terms, DUH. Many politicians expect to have the questions before hand (example: Pres. Obama (most any Pres.) will have certain people ask questions )
@JFM94 She probably would not be in Piers show if she were not. Not many authors make it on his show. I would not consider her much of one though. She is probably heading more on the Sarah Palin track and being an advocate.
@zzztek Ask my mama?I presume that some sort of feeble attempt at an insult !,Harressment ? there was no harressment ,it was an interview .Its the job of an interviewer to ask questions ,She didnt and wouldnt .As for only being asked questions that the interviewee wants to be asked ,Well thats whats wrong in ur part of the world ,it's neither right nor appropriate .that a politician gets an eay ride.Try seeing how politicians are interviewed in other parts of the world and it will open ur eyes
- Harass: " (1) : to annoy persistently (2) : to create an unpleasant or hostile situation for especially by uninvited and unwelcome verbal or physical conduct"
how can it be harressment or a hostile situation.Hes an interviewer shes the interviewee,She wouldnt answer his questions Questions that were perfectly valid given her comments in her book...And yes we are MOST CERTAINTLY in another part of the world ,,,,,THANK GOD!
@amadan9999 How? I gave you the definition. He is doing both (1) and (2).
And YES, I am MOST CERTAINLY correct.
When a person is digging a hole, they should stop. And Yes, you should.
BTW, I have been in dozens of places in other parts of the world. There have been few places I would even consider living. Some of their highlights but their lowlights are so horrendous.
Perhaps if you re read my comment to you ,then maybe you would be able to respond accordingly and also correct your grammar!!!When you do both ,then maybe I might be able to reply
@amadan9999 LOL, when digging people always bring in a perceived Non sequitur.
If you have an issue with comprehension, please ask. I will be happy to communicate using words that you understand.
Which part do you not understand?
When Piers repeats the same question (more than 3 times) after Christine said she would not go there (answer his repeated question), that is harassing. Is that more comprehensible for you?
No not digging at all .Re read your last paragraph in your previous comment and see how "wonderful" your grammar is .
The interviewer asked about something she worte about (or maybe she didnt write it !!) and she wont answer the question ,It's a terrible response from the interviewee.The question was based on her own public statements and she wont answer ,
As for your comment " I am MOST CERTAINLY correct.",,i have no clue what on earth you are on about.!!!!!!
@amadan9999 You can always tell when one is not winning the discussion, they attack the individual. They also repeat statements that have no relevance. Really? Grammar is bothering you?
I said she should have responded but Piers is being rude with the harassment.
Do you really dislike Christine that much? Crazy how people get so upset/rabid over certain individuals.
Oh it's nothing to do about "winning " a discussion .I'm far more grown up than to play silly childish games.Attack the individual ? .Pointing out a grammar error is not attacking anyone .
I also dont think I mentioned whether I liked or disliked Christine O Donnell at all ,nor did I get upset over certain individuals....
@amadan9999 Pointing out a possible grammar error is not very "adult" in a discussion and is used to point out "faults" of another.
I asked if you disliked her? So do you dislike her? You comments lend people to think that you are not her biggest fan.
Your somewhat incoherent sentence "She wanted to only wanted to interviewd on her terms" shows that you were criticizing her and assuming something about her "wants".
Your back-hand attacks show you are not very "grown up".
Well its;' only right and proper that one points out your grammar errors as they made NO sense whatsoever.
Asking someone do they like or dislike another is extremely childish,The interviewee in any interview should answer questions that he/she had already published in a book he/she wants to sell .Its a nonsense not to do so
@amadan9999 "only right and proper that one points out your grammar", said by one who has trouble creating sentences and spelling. "She wanted to only wanted to interviewd on her terms ". BTW, you never pointed out which sentence.
This is also the same person who believes a leader should act like a bookkeeper and not worry about gettng the best solution.
"Asking someone do they like or dislike another is extremely childish", REALLY? Guess you are not married?
@ersatx210 - yeah, Rush Limbaugh's two most annoying qualities are that he's fat and he's going bald. I think you'll agree with me that we should condemn all fat people, all bald people, and use genetic testing to screen for unborn children who are likely to become fat or bald, and yes, abort the lot of them.
The Republican Party is dying. Republicans, by in large, are ANTI-gay, ANTI-poor, ANTI-minority, and anti anything who isn't Rich, White, or Wealthy. The younger generation doesn't like that obese, balding, filthy-rich, racist buffoon: Rush Limbaugh, nor do they like the "bimbo" from Alaska who QUIT on the people of Alaska to chase millions at FLAWED NEWS (Fox News). She's intellectually deficient along with Newt, Trump, Huckabee, McCain et al.
anyone who is unable to answer a fucking question will never get my vote. this shit is just ridicules, even people who are not involved in the race wont talk about this crap. what hope does our government have to work through these issues if people wont grow a god damn back bone.
I just paid $23,98 for an iPad2-64GB and my girlfriend loves her Panasonic Lumix GF 1 Camera that we got for $37,59 there arriving tomorrow by UPS. I will never pay such expensive retail prices in stores again. Especially when I also sold a 40 inch LED TV to my boss for $677 which only cost me $72,13 to buy. Here is the website we use to get it all from, COolCent. com
don't you think as a host you should address what i want to talk about ... who is this idiot?? I'm glad i don't live in the states. it'd drive a sane person crazy, surely
Didn't she talk to a FOX new affiliate about him asking her sex questions? Then called him a cheeky bugger? WTF? XD LMAO! She's such a retarded bitch. She needs to go back to the basement and practice being a lv3 wiccan.
For fucks sake, stop being so off putting. It is more than obvious that you know you're views are so radical that it would just be another embarrassment to any political party to state them in an interview.
"It appears that the interview has just been ended because I have the audacity to ask questions based on stuff that's in this book..." ? Way to go Christine. I always knew you'd make the tea party proud.
I think she got sodomized from her republican tea party dinner at six...just wondering whether vibrators baseball bats or the republican bible was used???
She's not answering because she knows she's wrong about the case of homosexuality. she is not secure in her religious beliefs. she knows it's bullshit, but she is afraid to say it out loud because her constituents would be mad at her.
What a stupid person and a failed book promo. If she is not running for office why the fuck is she so afraid to answer a simple question. And, why the fuck is this on the top news, google news can kiss my ass too.
@demigodsmantis If only there was a vaccine for stupidity. :( There are all kinds of people in the whole world and it seems that we just keep putting the simple minded embarrassments of humanity on TV.
The Republican party needs to get together and literally kick out the "tea party" infiltrators who are running as Republicans but are obviously not, out of the party. The "real" GOP needs to take their party back and they need to do it quick. "tea party" candidates should be running as independents, or they should form their own party, not infiltrate another party and try to take it over.
We the LPLU little people like us, should be asking politicians is just this say what you really think. Then we can vote based on reality not some sound bite reality that serves no purpose. People who can't or won't tell what they really think are just scoundrels and we need more of those in this hyped up world. Futures Bright Past Positive (google it) is working to empower us the Little People Like Us take more control of the debate. All people have the right to be heard regardless of whet
I thought Piers was his usual polite self. But hey what do I know. Why didn't he quote from her book and be done with it. Not sure she's worth much of a plug though.
Typical Republican....."I don't like making my bigotry too public so I'm walking away."
AstronomyGuru84 3 days ago in playlist Uploaded videos
THIS IS CHRISTINE TRYING TO REMAIN IN THE CLOSET ABOUT HATING GAYS. You cant sit on the fence Christine, stand by your beliefs and answer the questions like an adult
Gordo80 2 weeks ago
@cbh, its call old world charm. ;) He remains sweet as sugar, and she becomes the radical. @ mrcwells, snap!
ars81083 2 months ago
Christine O'Donnell is a Virgo. And every Virgo- down to the last one of them- is a prudish, conservative, mealy-mouthed asshole. Every single person who just absolutely SUCKS as a human being- Bill O'Reilly, Maggie Gallagher, etc, etc, etc- ALL of them Virgos. The shittiest sign in all of Astrology...
MrCWells3000 2 months ago
well done piers morgan for staying on topic and not moving on. It shows her up for the sleazy, homophobe that she is. If she has views that are anti-gay - which she clearly does - then she should have to face up to them on national television. Why should she get to choose the questions he asks her?
thejon10001 2 months ago
"Is a great book" C'mon Piers you hate the damn book, we also hate the damn book.
cbh598cbh 2 months ago
So... does anyone actually take this woman seriously? She's like Sarah Palin, but less intelligent in interviews.
Oh. And "I'm not a witch." Sure, O'Donnell... sure. =)
carlotta4th 3 months ago
What a snotty arrogant bitch.
meg3325 3 months ago
"I'm here to talk about the book and what's in it"
"do you talk about your views on gay marriage in your book?"
"yes"
:-/
wattever333 5 months ago 2
Rude is a word that people use to get out of any situation, correctly or incorrectly.
Piers was not rude here, obviously. He didn't even underline the fact that she contradicted herself.
I guess logic is not her strong point.
They didn't have an agreement about what they would talk about, so he's entitled to talk about what we wants.
especially if she's a politician.
bah! it's all so obvious!
wattever333 5 months ago
Bring America *back* to the second american revolution? Wtf? There hasn't been a second revolution.... yet.
disamjisa 6 months ago
Coooooward...
jlvfr 6 months ago
Piers 1, Christine "Eimnottawich" 0
"...the adamant cannot have their way in the world..."
mowgli2071 6 months ago
"Making America great again..." Haha, my type of humour!
callmefilip 6 months ago
Look at the smug smile on Christine O'Donell's face. She swells with visible pride as she dodges this crucial question and argues with Piers. She acts like a teenager fighting with a parent. She clearly tries to change the subject and obviously didn't want to answer the question. This tell me and other Americans a lot about Christine O'Donelle's attitude toward diversity and morals as both a human being and politician. I have now have mad respect for Piers. Obviously I can't say the same about
ItsJustMeJustinE 6 months ago
Zeeeeebrable 6 months ago
what a tit
boxersforever3 6 months ago
Piers Morgan is a dick head. Would rather he dissapeared from all televisions
RichyDYupYup 6 months ago
I'm going to the Republican's women's club. PRICELESS
Ru1eBritannia 6 months ago
Comment removed
Ru1eBritannia 6 months ago
If you come to an interview, be prepared to answer questions. You can't pick and choose which you'd like to have asked and which you'd rather not be brought up. Either way, he does, in fact, stay on topic. I see no wrong in asking about the book SHE wrote and views of issues covered within it.
NinjaKychan 6 months ago 10
Did she really laugh at his question? Wow...
kal981 6 months ago
Glad she didn't win in Delaware! Thank You Jesus!!!
Gelli889 6 months ago
I love Piers Morgan!!! He's so funny in this interview!!!
DanHoang1974 6 months ago
Walking off Piers' show because she didn't want to answer a question about what she wrote in a book she's hawking. Just goes to show, if O'Donnell can't control what an interviewer can or can't ask, or she'll walk. No loss, she's a self-absorbed idiot., as far as I'm concerned, I personally care less what she has to say anyway. With hope other news orgs won't invite her to appear on their programs. So, she doomed to appear only on Un-Fair and Un-Balanced Fox News.
zekester2 6 months ago 2
@TylerNull Secondly, you are mistaken - we discriminate against both reparative therapy and those that advertise reparative therapy (many of which claim to be "Ex-gay", deluded and oppressed by hateful propaganda - many taking their own lives shortly after "treatment" without being "outed", as you claim).
Lastly, the term "outed" defines a member of the (mostly) heterosexual community forcing a Gay out of the closet - such as the case of Tyler Clementi. It is rare for the "outer" to be gay.
Etular 6 months ago 6
@TylerNull "Homophobic", as a term, is the exact same as that of the terms "Racist", "Sexist" etc. They were ALL invented by, as you call them, "activist brats" to define people so stuck in the past that they can't contemplate people veering from the socially accepted norm. Plus, the fact that pretty much every word in any language is, by logic, man-made does little but to ruin what point you have - it's called civilisation. Words are created to communicate and represent aspects of life.
Etular 6 months ago 2
How much cost this piece of toilet paper?
camaleon9 6 months ago
@SenatorWeitPauer
"If they're only oppressed when they are outed, then who's doing the oppression?"
Those who outed them.
Was that REALLY such a brain teaser? Anyway, keep blaming the 90% of your countrymen -- "terrorists", as you call us -- who think government debt and deficit spending are too big.
Clearly, that's all about the latest whims of rich, white, spoiled brat homosexual activists and their last few dozen "Life Partners". LOL.
TylerNull 6 months ago
*facedesk* After I misread the definition of "analogy" from earlier, I was a tad confused by your most recent comment. After re-reading it, to simplify (correct me if I'm wrong), you compare homosexuality to 1) Hunting fellow Humans (of which the comparison I cannot grasp) and 2) In your second post, "same liberty to marry as any other pervert OR normal person", you compare it to being perverse in some way.
I'd argue, but first wish to clarify if I'm correct in my understanding.
Etular 6 months ago
Christine O'Donnell writes a book. Then she doesn't want to talk about what she wrote in the book. Do you know that as a public figure, you will have to answer difficult questions. As I watch Piers, I wonder where the sexual harassment comes in? NEVER have I seen an interview where YOU get to choose what is asked by a reporter or talk show host. Really? Come on... don't think you are going to sell books this way...As Forrest Gump says, "Stupid is is Stupid does." C. Odonnell hang it up!
jgdennis1 6 months ago
she is such a pompous bitch.
thecowsreview 6 months ago
❤❤❤
HAPPY MARRIAGE? I'm all for it.
A same-sex marriage license is as nonsensical as a same-species hunting license.
And just because the state won't grant you a duck hunting license to hunt Boy Scouts doesn't mean anyone is trampling on your liberties.
Spoiled brat Leftists pose as victims whilst going on jihad against Western culture. Their mindless slogans are recited, unquestioned by the ideological monolith of media, until everyone repeats their nonsense as if it's something sane.
❤❤❤
TylerNull 6 months ago
@TylerNull I'd honestly love to hear your belief of how you believe it is both nonsensical, and comparable to hunting. In my eyes, it's no more absurd than the concept of heterosexual marriage - some man-made "divine" bond in the name of some "Holy Being/God". The main reason people in the same-sex community actually give a damn about marriage is the 1100+ rights that come with it.
Also, you seem to be confusing Leftists with Extreme Rightists when you discuss "mindless slogans [...] recited".
Etular 6 months ago
@Etular
"comparable to hunting"
It's a bit creepy to consider so many are unable to grasp the concept of an analogy, assuming their stupor is real, so I'll consider their confusion's due to its relevance. Honestly.
And you needn't convince me those Leftists pretending to suddenly adore the institution of marriage are after it only for the gov't perks.
Your last bit was a valid argument to abolish the nest of social engineering laws, not to redefine marriage at the whim of spoiled brats.
TylerNull 6 months ago
@TylerNull Lastly, and finally, I would love to ask how the leftist ideology is, in any way, not "sane". You wouldn't want to be treated like a pile of crap, nor would anyone else (be it gays, racial minorities, women etc.). What part of introducing laws to prevent these people being treated like crap would be seen as insane, I ask? What part of "We are all Human" and "Follow yer own damned Golden Rule that yer preach" is so difficult to understand, hard to grasp or absurd to believe?
Etular 6 months ago
@Etular
What part of the analogy thereof did you truly not grasp? Oh, that's right, its the very CONCEPT of an analogy that confused you. That's okay, I'm here to help:
The only people infringing on the liberty of homosexuals to marry are the homo-activists who boastfully OUT them, devastating their wives & children, all for political gain.
Ironically, that's also how we know for certain that homosexuals enjoy and exercise the very same liberty to marry as any other pervert OR normal person.
TylerNull 6 months ago
@TylerNull Your use of advanced linguistics to back up your point and make me appear uneducated fails to impress me. I'd like you to keep in mind that, whilst I am an A-Level student, I'm only beginning to study English Language next year - thus, I assume I'll learn about such techniques at that point.
Etular 6 months ago
@TylerNull Regardless, to dismiss the constant homophobic attacks such as that of Christine O'Donnell and claim we are impeaching on our own rights, more than anything else, is, quite frankly, laughable (or was that statement "sarcasm"?).
The LGBT community, if "outing" anyone (regardless of which, is almost always frowned upon by the community itself), chooses only to out anti-gay Politicians for, as you say, a political advantage - pointing out their hypocrisy.
Etular 6 months ago
@Etular
The laughable claim here is that of "homophobic" -- a meaningless term invented by activist brats trying to sound technical.
The historical record of homosexual activists intimidating and otherwise discriminating against homosexual men who marry is a bit more than a "claim", mine or anyone else's.
And it's not exactly a state secret. The homosexual activists do so with pride & gaiety, and they do it so often they gave it a name -- "OUTED". All you did was try to defend it.
TylerNull 6 months ago
Comment removed
Etular 6 months ago
@TylerNull -__- it saddens me to think that there are still so many of you dumb people.
shadowblade145 6 months ago
@shadowblade145
It delights me to observe your ilk wallowing in your own emotions instead of addressing ANY political point.
Leftist Fundies -- the pride & gaiety of self absorbed dolts.
TylerNull 6 months ago
@TylerNull I think you need to get off the internet for 20 minutes and spend some time in reality.
shadowblade145 6 months ago
@shadowblade145 ♦♦♦ Do more thinking. ♦♦♦
If you Leftist fringe types ever allowed reality to seep in, then you would acknowledge the fact that children raised by homosexual pairs suffer a RADICALLY higher rate of homosexuality.
Then again, that's expected when such children are forced to participate throughout their formative years in the macabre charade of denying their "mother" is, in reality, a psychotic man.
Leftist Fundies -- Self Love Gone Wild.
TylerNull 6 months ago
@TylerNull Look at you with your nifty symbols at the top of your comment! And I didn't mention anything about gay marriage. So now you're just being and asshole (much like Christine O'Donnell)
shadowblade145 6 months ago
@shadowblade145
Your inability to address any political point isn't news to me,
but congratulations on admitting it.
❤❤❤❤❤
(Baby steps.)
Now, keep bragging about your inabilities (much like any other Leftist lemming).
TylerNull 6 months ago
@TylerNull :O You've put them in the middle now! aren't you fancy. Now have fun talking politics to internet people instead of taking action in the real world. This is will get you nowhere. end of discussion.
shadowblade145 6 months ago
@shadowblade145
There was no discussion.
You failed to articulate ... anything relevant to ... any political point.
Even after I stuck the toxic REAL WORLD effects of homo-activism right under your Leftist snout.
Your purpose here was to help me demonstrate the inability of Leftists to allow reality to seep into their fantasy land.
And you did outstandingly well.
★★★★★
TylerNull 6 months ago
@TylerNull Lol and you still continue. Stupid trolls (IT WAS A THE END THAT TIME! EXCELLENT JOB HONEY!)
shadowblade145 6 months ago
@TylerNull
What a load of tosh,,,,People dont become gay they are born gay ,,by your logic then why arnt all children raised by hetrosexual pairs suffer "RADICALLY higher rate of hetrosexuality ? the facts are they dont ,,,,
Its nothing to do with leftist or whatever ,,its reality ,,,,
amadan9999 6 months ago
@amadan9999
Your rejection of empirical data by regressing to your own faulty logic isn't anyone else's "load of tosh".
TylerNull 6 months ago
@TylerNull
Really ?Please enlighten me as to how a person "becomes gay" by living with a gay couple ?Again I say ,,with your logic then EVERY child brought up by a hetrosexual couple wilI become hetrosexual,which is clearly NOT the case.Perhaps you should open your mind to reeality and facts
amadan9999 6 months ago
@amadan9999
Speaking of "open your mind to reality and facts", neither my answer nor the facts it referenced have changed since the last time you ignored them.
FOCUS:
Regardless of "how" an observable occurred, its occurrence remains.
Your logical failures are overshadowed by your demonstrated ignorance of what logic even is, nonetheless of when, where, or how to apply it. Your politics fit you well.
Get lucid.
TylerNull 6 months ago
@TylerNull
Well the facts are you failed to acknowledge my quite logical and factual reference to reality .As for my politics ,I havent mentioned my political beliefs at all .Assumptions get you no where,
Get real.
amadan9999 6 months ago
@amadan9999
Your politics are quite evident.
Never ASSUME that your inabilities are shared by others.
TylerNull 6 months ago
@TylerNull
Really are they ? Enlighten me
amadan9999 6 months ago
all these news people are money makeing pukes
tomanyasses 6 months ago
Silly Piers asking questions she wasn't prepared for...learn to be more sycophantic like everyone else!
EMERALDEYE1982 6 months ago
Does she not realize 99% of the founders of this country were secular and anti-religious?!
mneunbamboon 6 months ago
@mneunbamboon " 99% of the founders of this country were secular and anti-religious" Really? Any evidence / survey? Religion & churches were a big part of this founding nation. If you do not believe me, look at all of the churches that date themselves (their lineage) for a couple hundred years.
zzztek 6 months ago
@zzztek Lol, don't even talk to me, ignorant fuck. Go look up Thomas Jefferson quotes. Go look up Benjamin Franklin quotes. Go look up John Adams quotes. Look back to how the constitution gives up religious freedom, instead of forcing us to belong to the Church of England....use your brain. Try to make it work. Just because some of the colonial settlers of this nation were religious, doesn't mean the founders were. It's common sense. Kbye
mneunbamboon 5 months ago
@mneunbamboon, let me help with your ignorance.
John Adams: Unitarianism is a Christian theological movement
Thomas Jefferson: Episcopal Church, Unitarianism. "God who gave us life gave us liberty..."
Benjamin Franklin felt that organized religion was necessary to keep men good to their fellow men. considered himself a Christian
George Washington: Episcopal. "I now make it my earnest prayer the God..."
Personal Attacks usually come from those who have a weak argument.
zzztek 5 months ago
@mneunbamboon More education for you.
James Madison: Episcopalian
"Religion is the basis and Foundation of Government." June 20, 1785
Ben Franklin: ""Here is my Creed. I believe in on God, the Creator of the Universe. That He governs it by His Providence."
John Adams:
"The Christian religion is above all the Religions.."
I hope I help with your ignorance. Have a good day.
zzztek 5 months ago
@mneunbamboon i'm sorry i thumed down your comment when i was tryon to click reply :( but i agree with you :)
12345TheRonan 5 months ago
Hahahahahaha...
mneunbamboon 6 months ago
"Do you answer this question in your book?"
"Yeah, I do! But i'm not here to discuss this, i'm here to talk about what I've written in my book"
.....I'm sorry, but what the hell?
FraimFilmsGaming 6 months ago 10
Why is only right-wingers get pissy and walk out of interviews? I seem to remember someone doing that to Larry King for being "rude," and Tom Tancredo did it on MSNBC when Markos Moulitsas called him a chickenhawk.
These cowards should stay away from real interviews and stick to Fox.
EmrysImmortal 6 months ago 3
@EmrysImmortal You must not watch many interviews. Those on the left throw their fits also.
Do you remember when Speaker Nancy shut down the meeting because she was not getting her way?
zzztek 6 months ago
@zzztek I watch many interviews, but I wasn't aware a "meeting" was the same thing as an interview. Please provide a link to the video for this "Speaker Nancy" thing. I'll bet there's more to it than you're suggesting (or maybe there's less).
EmrysImmortal 6 months ago
@EmrysImmortal I was speaking to your "get pissy and walk".
check out "House Dems turn out the lights but GOP keeps talking" on politico. There was another occurrance that I did not find the page for.
see you tube: "President Clinton's Fmr Campaign Advisor Walks Off Fox News Interview"
" A Democrat appears on Fox News, throws a tantrum, and then
walks out on a live debate on the air. "- the examiner.
Point is, that it is not just the Right who are throwing tantrums.
zzztek 6 months ago
@zzztek Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House, adjourned the House for August recess. Republicans objected and threw a tantrum.
I'll grant you Simon Rosenberg was woefully unprepared for the non-stop interruptions (at least 6) and abuse from his debate opponent, Ben Ferguson. Apparently, he forgot what year this is.
"A Democrat appears on Fox News...." does not exist. I used Google searches and looked on Examiner to try to find it. If you have an active link I'll look at it.
EmrysImmortal 6 months ago
@EmrysImmortal She adjourned for recess when she was not getting her way. As for throwing a tantrum, the Reps stayed there and continued to discuss the agenda. Not sure how that is throwing a tantrum (in this case)..
Apparently, it is not only "right-wingers get pissy and walk out".
zzztek 6 months ago
@zzztek Nancy Pelosi had already got her way. There was to be no vote on the item the Republicans wanted. The only thing left was to adjourn for August break.
In case you missed it, the Speaker sets the agenda. That's the rule. Republicans always think *they* set the agenda regardless of whether or not they are in charge. They threw a tantrum during a House recess. How is that Pelosi's problem? She followed the rules. Republicans didn't.
Still waiting for that link. Thanks.
EmrysImmortal 6 months ago
@EmrysImmortal Yes, she got her way but shutting down the discussion.
Yes, the speaker sets the agenda but a true leader would not stop discussion in the middle and "take the gavel with".
As for your partisan comment, not relevant to discussion. It is just a partisan non-sequitor.
I gave you the titles and source. YouTube hates embedded links. The video was enough to make the point that it is not just those on the right. The link you ask for only confirms again, your mistake.
zzztek 6 months ago
@zzztek This is a partisan discussion. We both know it.
A true leader sets the agenda and then sticks to it. She did. The Republicans tried to bully her into a vote. She, being a real leader, did not let them do that.
I found the Rosenberg item and addressed that. You don't have to embed links to tell me where to find the other one. Just write it out (domain-dot-com-/-folder-/-file-dot-html). YouTube will not censor that. I do not believe that one exists. Prove it does.
EmrysImmortal 6 months ago
@EmrysImmortal I certainly glad I am not a partisan where I am expected to lemming behind in lockstep.
A true leader is not so rigid. If they were it would be near impossible to win any battles.
A true leader sets an agenda and works to get the CORRECT answer and not a partisan one.
She was anything but a good leader (unfortunately there is not any or many on the hill).
I proved my point and you agreed, No need to provide a link to something you agreed with.
Good Evening.
zzztek 6 months ago
@zzztek You are a partisan. You are a conservative. A conservative's definition of what a leader is and what leadership is changes depending on who is in charge.
I did not agree with your point, you never proved that. You never provided me with a link to an article you claim proves your point. That link does not exist. It is as phony as your argument. Further, I believe you know that.
Good night.
EmrysImmortal 6 months ago
@EmrysImmortal Obviously I am not a partisan. My words and actions prove differently, yours do not.
- "sets the agenda and then sticks to it." describes the secretary/bookkeeper.
- Leader: "The person who leads or commands a group, organization, or country", no where does the definition say anything about an agenda.
- "Why is only right-wingers get pissy and walk out of interviews?" : Simon Rosenberg proves my point.
Partisan Glasses you wear blind you to truth and fact.
zzztek 6 months ago
Piers: Do you support gay marriage?
O'Donnel: That's rude. I want to talk about thing in my book.
Piers: Well, isn't that in your book?
O'Donnel: Yes but that's still rude. Now I'm gonna leave and go have sex with John McCain.
Mrtechguru15 6 months ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
Couldnt care less...
Shatter7 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WTF? O'Donnell must be stoned or stupid. Only Right wing gay haters and morons are going to buy her dumb ass book. Why not say she's anti gay marriage?
337noname 6 months ago 2
Comment removed
337noname 6 months ago
To be honest, I think if there's god above than he loves all of us because he created us, us the humankind. It's just in our hands what we make of it, nobody chooses to be gay or straight, it's just part of what you are and I think you deserve the right to love whoever you want to love whether the person is from the same gender or not. And I think it's disgusting how many people need to hide thereselves and pretend to be something they're not because our society wouldn't accept it.
BrandNewShoe 6 months ago 2
All in the GOP do this. No talk, just walk! The Party of Gridlock
coltor9 6 months ago
Shes a dick, im a straight guy and it disgusts me when people are homophobic. People should be able to love whoever they want no matter their gender. People like Christine O'Donnell need to open their eyes a bit more to the world. As god doesnt exist fucking read up on the Hadron Collider its proving all you Bible Bashing shits wrong
Joeybobs94 6 months ago 2
@Joeybobs94 Wow, I never heard someone saying this as a man, all the people I know at least the guys I know are homophobic, you're great and I'm off the same opinion.
BrandNewShoe 6 months ago
@BrandNewShoe good, we need more people the world understand homosexual people are just people just like heterosexual people, we are all equal
Joeybobs94 6 months ago
@Joeybobs94
fellow straight ally *highfives*
pyr666 6 months ago
@pyr666 haha cant resist a highfive *highfivesback*
Joeybobs94 6 months ago
religion says being gay is bad. Maybe so, Im not gay , so I wouldnt know. I think the whole issue is kinda funny though. Scientists say we only use 10% of our brain. I guess discussing the importance of someones sexuality is part of the 90% group. the real issue is. for years, these assholes in media and politics use the topic to stab at each other over votes just like they use abortion. When the truth is, they dont give a flying fuck about you, your sexuality our your religious beliefs.
baracuss123 6 months ago
When you get down to the low level of Bachmann, Palin, & O'Donnell, it's darn difficult to determine who's the dumbest.
DillonDee1 6 months ago 2
@DillonDee1 I think it's a tie between Perry & O'Donnell, as the other two Palin and Bachmann...... Well, I guess you're right. I can't tell who's the dumbest. It's just too hard to seperate them.
coltor9 6 months ago
Piers is a bit rude when he asks the same question more than 5 times and she chose not to answer it. She probably could have answered it with a non-answer and they would have been done.
zzztek 6 months ago
@zzztek
Hes an interviewer,,An interviewer asks people questions.Shes brought out a book ,he asked her about something she wrote in the book( her anti gay views) ,He wasnt rude at all ,he did his job ,She wanted to only wanted to interviewd on her terms ,,,,,it doesnt work that way .....it was a pathetic silly thing she did
amadan9999 6 months ago
@amadan9999 Really? Go ask your mama if Harassment is rude. Many times harassment is illegal and people get sued over it.
Are you a Piers lover or a Christine hater? Partisan people often show their ignorance in their response.
BTW, most politicians only want to be interviewed on their own terms, DUH. Many politicians expect to have the questions before hand (example: Pres. Obama (most any Pres.) will have certain people ask questions )
zzztek 6 months ago
@zzztek I really wouldn't consider her a politician though
JFM94 6 months ago
@JFM94 She probably would not be in Piers show if she were not. Not many authors make it on his show. I would not consider her much of one though. She is probably heading more on the Sarah Palin track and being an advocate.
zzztek 6 months ago
@zzztek Ask my mama?I presume that some sort of feeble attempt at an insult !,Harressment ? there was no harressment ,it was an interview .Its the job of an interviewer to ask questions ,She didnt and wouldnt .As for only being asked questions that the interviewee wants to be asked ,Well thats whats wrong in ur part of the world ,it's neither right nor appropriate .that a politician gets an eay ride.Try seeing how politicians are interviewed in other parts of the world and it will open ur eyes
amadan9999 6 months ago
@amadan9999
- You Presume wrong
- Harass: " (1) : to annoy persistently (2) : to create an unpleasant or hostile situation for especially by uninvited and unwelcome verbal or physical conduct"
- We are not in another part of the world.
Wow! Good Job! You are 3 for 3, ALL WRONG.
zzztek 6 months ago
@zzztek
how can it be harressment or a hostile situation.Hes an interviewer shes the interviewee,She wouldnt answer his questions Questions that were perfectly valid given her comments in her book...And yes we are MOST CERTAINTLY in another part of the world ,,,,,THANK GOD!
amadan9999 6 months ago
@amadan9999 How? I gave you the definition. He is doing both (1) and (2).
And YES, I am MOST CERTAINLY correct.
When a person is digging a hole, they should stop. And Yes, you should.
BTW, I have been in dozens of places in other parts of the world. There have been few places I would even consider living. Some of their highlights but their lowlights are so horrendous.
zzztek 6 months ago
@zzztek
Perhaps if you re read my comment to you ,then maybe you would be able to respond accordingly and also correct your grammar!!!When you do both ,then maybe I might be able to reply
amadan9999 6 months ago
@amadan9999 LOL, when digging people always bring in a perceived Non sequitur.
If you have an issue with comprehension, please ask. I will be happy to communicate using words that you understand.
Which part do you not understand?
When Piers repeats the same question (more than 3 times) after Christine said she would not go there (answer his repeated question), that is harassing. Is that more comprehensible for you?
zzztek 6 months ago
@zzztek
No not digging at all .Re read your last paragraph in your previous comment and see how "wonderful" your grammar is .
The interviewer asked about something she worte about (or maybe she didnt write it !!) and she wont answer the question ,It's a terrible response from the interviewee.The question was based on her own public statements and she wont answer ,
As for your comment " I am MOST CERTAINLY correct.",,i have no clue what on earth you are on about.!!!!!!
amadan9999 6 months ago
@amadan9999 You can always tell when one is not winning the discussion, they attack the individual. They also repeat statements that have no relevance. Really? Grammar is bothering you?
I said she should have responded but Piers is being rude with the harassment.
Do you really dislike Christine that much? Crazy how people get so upset/rabid over certain individuals.
zzztek 6 months ago
@zzztek
Oh it's nothing to do about "winning " a discussion .I'm far more grown up than to play silly childish games.Attack the individual ? .Pointing out a grammar error is not attacking anyone .
I also dont think I mentioned whether I liked or disliked Christine O Donnell at all ,nor did I get upset over certain individuals....
amadan9999 6 months ago
@amadan9999 Pointing out a possible grammar error is not very "adult" in a discussion and is used to point out "faults" of another.
I asked if you disliked her? So do you dislike her? You comments lend people to think that you are not her biggest fan.
Your somewhat incoherent sentence "She wanted to only wanted to interviewd on her terms" shows that you were criticizing her and assuming something about her "wants".
Your back-hand attacks show you are not very "grown up".
zzztek 6 months ago
@zzztek
Well its;' only right and proper that one points out your grammar errors as they made NO sense whatsoever.
Asking someone do they like or dislike another is extremely childish,The interviewee in any interview should answer questions that he/she had already published in a book he/she wants to sell .Its a nonsense not to do so
amadan9999 6 months ago
@amadan9999 "only right and proper that one points out your grammar", said by one who has trouble creating sentences and spelling. "She wanted to only wanted to interviewd on her terms ". BTW, you never pointed out which sentence.
This is also the same person who believes a leader should act like a bookkeeper and not worry about gettng the best solution.
"Asking someone do they like or dislike another is extremely childish", REALLY? Guess you are not married?
zzztek 6 months ago
@zzztek
Eh have another look at the video,it's self explanatory.
A leader and book keeper eh scuse me ? elaborate ,,,
And you're making silly assumptions again ,,
amadan9999 5 months ago
@ersatx210 - yeah, Rush Limbaugh's two most annoying qualities are that he's fat and he's going bald. I think you'll agree with me that we should condemn all fat people, all bald people, and use genetic testing to screen for unborn children who are likely to become fat or bald, and yes, abort the lot of them.
subquest 6 months ago
Piers Morgan is the Shiznitto-Bam-Bitto!!!
TheJmurph11 6 months ago
I swear to God every time I see this woman I get a boner because I just can't help but picture her masturbating vigorously
chronDiggity 6 months ago
We don't need to do much to make her and bachmann look bad. they do it themselves hahaha
amzcck937 6 months ago 3
I'll get you my pretty and your little dog too!!!! *Flies off the set*
rockingout1018 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Republican Party is dying. Republicans, by in large, are ANTI-gay, ANTI-poor, ANTI-minority, and anti anything who isn't Rich, White, or Wealthy. The younger generation doesn't like that obese, balding, filthy-rich, racist buffoon: Rush Limbaugh, nor do they like the "bimbo" from Alaska who QUIT on the people of Alaska to chase millions at FLAWED NEWS (Fox News). She's intellectually deficient along with Newt, Trump, Huckabee, McCain et al.
ersatx210 6 months ago
Tea party = if we don't talk about it, people will forget. WRONG!
cichytom 6 months ago 3
anyone who is unable to answer a fucking question will never get my vote. this shit is just ridicules, even people who are not involved in the race wont talk about this crap. what hope does our government have to work through these issues if people wont grow a god damn back bone.
INCC74656I 6 months ago 2
Been there, done that. What gay marriage?
fl1867 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I just paid $23,98 for an iPad2-64GB and my girlfriend loves her Panasonic Lumix GF 1 Camera that we got for $37,59 there arriving tomorrow by UPS. I will never pay such expensive retail prices in stores again. Especially when I also sold a 40 inch LED TV to my boss for $677 which only cost me $72,13 to buy. Here is the website we use to get it all from, COolCent. com
carneyjane24 6 months ago
Terrorists threaten Dave Letterman!
/watch?v=QMRNI8DM4Ao
Allenpwnsu3 6 months ago
Cmon Christie....avoiding the questions only show youre a Closet Lesbian.
EvilFingers 6 months ago 3
the problem was that he was going to use FACTS to contradict her view of homossexuals, something that she is not used to in the Fox News interviews.
mestresombra 6 months ago
She just answered the question. Leaving means, "You're right, I side with Bachmann".
JoshuaNassir2 6 months ago
don't you think as a host you should address what i want to talk about ... who is this idiot?? I'm glad i don't live in the states. it'd drive a sane person crazy, surely
rwtj01 6 months ago
Didn't she talk to a FOX new affiliate about him asking her sex questions? Then called him a cheeky bugger? WTF? XD LMAO! She's such a retarded bitch. She needs to go back to the basement and practice being a lv3 wiccan.
ConservateEliberat0r 6 months ago
"Borderline Rude" George Carlin would love this phrase (lol)
bigtimcny 6 months ago
@bigtimcny haha, spot on
rwtj01 6 months ago
This would be similar to having Derek Jeter on his show and Derek refusing to answer 3,000 hit or Hall of Fame questions.
bigtimcny 6 months ago
For fucks sake, stop being so off putting. It is more than obvious that you know you're views are so radical that it would just be another embarrassment to any political party to state them in an interview.
"It appears that the interview has just been ended because I have the audacity to ask questions based on stuff that's in this book..." ? Way to go Christine. I always knew you'd make the tea party proud.
rosestainedglass 6 months ago
I think she got sodomized from her republican tea party dinner at six...just wondering whether vibrators baseball bats or the republican bible was used???
julesario 6 months ago
fuck the racist Republicans
negro2388 6 months ago
She's a homophobe
fanagot 6 months ago
I'm not a witch
DMaddox2010 6 months ago
She's not answering because she knows she's wrong about the case of homosexuality. she is not secure in her religious beliefs. she knows it's bullshit, but she is afraid to say it out loud because her constituents would be mad at her.
fightinglobo06 6 months ago
Had no trouble talking on Bill Maher's show???
coltor9 6 months ago
"It's not a topic I embrace, or an issue I'm championing right now"
Oh, so your book is just like you, full of shit. You're not a witch, you're a dumb bitch...
Bolgernow 6 months ago 34
What a stupid person and a failed book promo. If she is not running for office why the fuck is she so afraid to answer a simple question. And, why the fuck is this on the top news, google news can kiss my ass too.
quakepapi 6 months ago 3
@1:40 "...that are MOSTLY constitutional" meaning... some of them aren't? And she knows it?? ;)
thombone 6 months ago
for once, Piers has done well
merrymonarch 6 months ago
Piers! You're the shit! LOL! They can never stand the heat..
ionfiya 6 months ago
She really comes off looking like the uneducated nut that she is.
SCBRoslyn 6 months ago 14
wow...America!!! Stop producing such people!!!!
demigodsmantis 6 months ago 2
@demigodsmantis If only there was a vaccine for stupidity. :( There are all kinds of people in the whole world and it seems that we just keep putting the simple minded embarrassments of humanity on TV.
silverwires1 6 months ago
The Republican party needs to get together and literally kick out the "tea party" infiltrators who are running as Republicans but are obviously not, out of the party. The "real" GOP needs to take their party back and they need to do it quick. "tea party" candidates should be running as independents, or they should form their own party, not infiltrate another party and try to take it over.
thombone 6 months ago
We the LPLU little people like us, should be asking politicians is just this say what you really think. Then we can vote based on reality not some sound bite reality that serves no purpose. People who can't or won't tell what they really think are just scoundrels and we need more of those in this hyped up world. Futures Bright Past Positive (google it) is working to empower us the Little People Like Us take more control of the debate. All people have the right to be heard regardless of whet
Armyboy1066 6 months ago
I thought Piers was his usual polite self. But hey what do I know. Why didn't he quote from her book and be done with it. Not sure she's worth much of a plug though.
Armyboy1066 6 months ago
Check THIS out :) gawker.com/5674353/i-had-a-one+night-stand-with-christine-odonnell
thombone 6 months ago
You all might find this to be a bit interesting... Youtube video code: 5iWRw3oZdg4
thombone 6 months ago
If Eric Cartman had a sister, she would be just like Christine O'Donnell...
RustyRazor2010 6 months ago
LOL Pier Morgan...you are hilarious.
kjeastcreek 6 months ago
What an ignorant bitch. That's all it comes to my mind.
luviano26 6 months ago
Hey bitch, lemme tell you something. Shut the fuck up.
That is all.
TheBiAtheist 6 months ago
You know ur dumb when u can't even answer question from a British
diceclay66 6 months ago
@diceclay66 from a British? What an ignorant cunt you are.
bewilderedkettle 6 months ago
@bewilderedkettle lol
sxehitman007 6 months ago
@diceclay66 You know you're stupid when you can't insult correctly.
sxehitman007 6 months ago
shes such a redneck
jimijackson 6 months ago
I would suggest people not publish things they're ashamed to talk about. Isn't that pretty basic logic, Ms. O'Donnell?
HollywoodHillsCookie 6 months ago
I seriously don't find the question rude at all. It was a question she could have answered with a Yes or a No... what a twat
rockstarmiento 6 months ago
Her and Bachmann are the biggest pussies when it comes to this. Just answer the damn question.
tigerslilly29 6 months ago 35
@tigerslilly29
It's not that easy, lol.
TheDmelis 6 months ago
@TheDmelis Yeah, I guess it isn't when you have oatmeal for brains!
tigerslilly29 6 months ago
I think she's inexperienced and had not anticipated this sort of situation and didn't know how to handle it. She's young.
spiralmetal 6 months ago