Added: 1 year ago
From: ontheearthproduction
Views: 34,532
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (453)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • More evidence/impacts of climate change series..

    (Please also READ before the denier with all the sock puppet accounts censors it)..

    .

    Manitoba chiefs declare emergency over ice road delays

    .

    Northern Manitoba aboriginal leaders have declared a state of emergency over delays in the opening of winter roads, and blamed weeks of sustained warm weather "caused by climate change" for the delays. They are also upset about "continuing political inaction."

    .

    Postmedia News

    12 January 2012

  • More evidence/impacts of climate change series..

    (PLEASE READ before the denier with all the sock puppet accounts censors it)..

    .

    Florida counties band together to ready for warming's effects

    .

    While U.S. action on climate change remains stalled, four south Florida counties have joined forces to plan for how to deal with the impacts, some of which are already being felt. of rising seas, higher temperatures, and more torrential rains.

    .

    Yale Environment 360

    12 January 2012

  • Noam 'New World Order' Chomsky. Notice how he never once actually talks about climatology. He hasn't a clue about it.

    'The climate is warming (no it isn't), so we should shut down all industry in the West and ship it to China and India. And we should have carbon taxes and cap and trade (Goldman Sachs) schemes.'

    That'll save the earth.

  • More evidence/impacts of climate change series..Nature Journal edition:

    (Please read article before the denier with all the sock puppet accounts is allowed to censor it)..

    .

    Thawing permafrost reduces river runoff

    .

    Chinese researchers have revealed that the amount of water entering the Yangtze River near its source on the Tibetan plateau has fallen by 15% over the past four decades, despite a 15% increase in glacial melt and increased rainfall over the same period.

    .

    Nature

    7 January 2012

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • More evidence/impacts of climate change series...(read it before the denier with all the sock puppet accounts censors it)..

    .

    Coal mega-mines a 'global threat'

    .

    The development of coal ''mega-mines'' in central Queensland, such as the massive China First project, will destroy the world's chance of keeping global warming to 2 degrees, the environmental group Greenpeace claims.

    .

    Sydney Morning Herald, Australia

    18 December 2011

  • Evidence / impacts of climate change series:

    .

    Quebec to start emission caps as Canada exits pact

    .

    The province of Quebec announced Thursday the launch of a carbon emissions cap-and-trade system in 2012, days after Canada became the only country to ratify and then withdraw from the Kyoto Protocol.

    .

    France-Presse

    16 December 2011

  • Science news...Nature Journal:

    .

    Three-quarters of climate change is man-made

    .

    Natural climate variability is extremely unlikely to have contributed more than about one-quarter of the temperature rise observed in the past 60 years, reports a pair of Swiss climate modellers in a paper published online today.

    .

    Nature

    5 December 2011

  • Entire enormous bodies of water have evaporated...there are already scarcity of clean water in the US...Ive witnesses two tornadoes in my town in NY where tornadoes never happened before....I cant remember the last time a storm didnt put us in emergency status. Its ridiculous that the uninformed population is so easily convinced through propoganda put out by oil comps. someone posted a site denying GW..I looked up all the chairpeople who put it together...they were ALL lobbyists for oil

  • I Don't think Noam and BIlly here actually understand the nitty gtriiy of GHG THeory if it were true.

    WRight now it is believed hat co2 % controls tempature and current CO2 Level is 390ppm while tempature is still down with 150 year ago c02 levels on the gaph

    Phil Jones data says tempature is now 1 degree abouve 282ppm CO2

    When tempatures match 323ppm or 6f degrees hotter then now dwe are extinct and when tempature matches 390ppm humans are long gone

    IF ghg teory was true,its over aready

  • @TheRealArchAngel I'll take scientists and Noam Chomsky over your denier gibberish any day, duh?

  • "I'll take scientists and Noam Chomsky over your denier gibberish any day, duh?"

    But the Sceientists, even the one on the IPCC are actually saying the same thing I am saying

    What the Media,Al Gore,UN, and the BLogasphere is saying the Scientists are saying is Hyped up AGW Meme nonesence, not actuall science or what the Scientists actually said

    Especially pay attention to the Scientists that thing the IPCC opinion is to optimistic if AGW Theory were true (It's actually over,we are dead)

  • "Especially pay attention to the Scientists that thing the IPCC opinion is to optimistic if AGW Theory were true (It's actually over,we are dead)"

    Specifically Phil Jones founf +1f o\ver the current tempature match with CO2 at 282ppm

    If AGW theory is true then during the suns 11 year cycle of heading to maximus the tempature will climb to match extinction causing 6f degrees hotter at 323ppm co2 and humans will be long gone when tempatures math 390ppm at +12f..tax,green tech, and policy(aside)

  • Evidence / impacts of climate change series:

    .

    Science not politics must drive Durban climate talks: IPCC chief

    .

    Global climate talks need to focus on the growing threat from extreme weather and shift away from political squabbles that hobble progress toward a tougher pact to rein in greenhouse gas emissions, the head of the U.N. climate panel said.

    .

    Reuters

    23 November 2011

  • Climate change news...for those interested...

    .

    Climate vulnerability

    .

    The Climate Vulnerable Forum includes small island states vulnerable to extreme weather and sea level rise, countries with immense spans of low-lying coastline, such as Vietnam and Bangladesh, and dry nations of East Africa. The forum is currently holding a meeting in Bangladesh, with UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon as the keynote speaker.

    . Fiji Times, Fiji

    15 November 2011

  • @Nightversionn They fly all over the world burning fuel so idiots like you will pay higher fuel taxes. And apart from islands that literally have sunk, the GIS satellite has seen oceans dropping for the past three years. There is no argument, the theory, politics and lies are over.

  • 99% of the Scientist?

    250 people on the IPCC, only 14 Scientists, only 3 of those "climatologists" do not 99% of "scientists make"

    Dissing Meterologists that follow the evaporation/percipitation cycle from the heat raising from the surface and DISAPAQTING as wind and cooling of moisture in evaporation as it reaches the colder upper troposphere and turn to clouds with further heat disapation making rain,thunder and lightning as not knowing what they are talking abou by a Philosipher is funny

  • The concensus once was that the world was flat. This is nothing more than propaganda and lies. I would even doubt that there is any scientific consensus of man made global warming at all apart from the gravy train climate scientists. The facts are that our planet is cooling abruptly and deeply as the effect of the cold PDO,low Sun activity and increased volcanic activity feed into the climate system. Co2 is a harmless atmospheric trace gas which is heavier than air and tends to hug the ground.

  • All the recent studies confirm global warming is happening and it's being accelerated by mankind.

    Don't anyone believe the oil industry trolls that are full-time on youtube saying otherwise

  • "All the recent studies confirm global warming is happening and it's being accelerated by mankind."

    Really?

    Then why has the UN abandoned AGW and is now trying to get taxation and policy powers via "Overpopulation = stain of resources" bullshhit whil they have basically left IPCC to coast into nonexistance/obscurity after obama gave economic policy powers to the World Bank and not UN?

    There is also the problem that politicans,especially the demorat ones,wont touch AGW after Nov 2010's fleecing

  • @Nightversionn Can you do maths? CO2 affects <7% of the light bandwidth, at 50% of absorption. These bands are approx 10Db down so approx 10% amplitude. IPCC agree 8% of the Earths CO2 is man released CO2.

    So, 0.07*0.5*0.1*0.08 = the influence man has on AGW. 0.028%. Now lets add that to the av. 20C Earth air temp. so we add 0.036C to the very generous 20C.

    Now grow up and get a life.

  • @m1aws Listen denier sock o puppet, I don't need to do the "maths" This is what we have SCIENTISTS for. So we don't have to reinvent the wheel each time we need specialized knowledge,

    duh?

  • @Nightversionn Many better people than I have labelled me a scientist. Being an engineer I've always hated that sloppy description.

    Wipe your bum, pull your nappy up and get mummy to adjust your pin.

    The maths are inarguable. If simple sums are not for you, the proofs all around. No tropo warming, no high temps over Venus' atmosphere at one bar, no heat retention on Mars. No positive feedback from historically high CO2 and the Vostock core readings show CO2 follows heating before CO2 release.

  • @m1aws No, you are an oil troll sock puppet, the same person who spreads well-funded oil industry propaganda all over this website under different user names

  • @Nightversionn Said the deluded idiot troll sock puppet. There is nobody as green as me. I'm a well insulated skrimp and I despise Governments and drive a 60mpg car. Well, ok, its not a small car,,, just... modified. :)

    So what's YOUR beef? Lost the argument so resort to name calling? Thats saaaad!

  • @m1aws Well, you're repeating well-funded oil industry talking points, and that's not green now is it?

  • @Nightversionn Nobody is funding me but my pension and my investments. Occasionally my hobbies. If you think I'm funded by oil industry I can easily say that of your position. I'm surrounded by kids who still believe in the accuracy of the written word but only from selected sources. I'm astounded on the long term predictability of our GW and the trends being so accurate while the IPCC keep altering their hockey sticks and their masters taxing the people.

    Yet you call me for following a line?

  • @m1aws I'm not name-calling. It is a statement of fact, deal.

  • etc..

  • I like how an anarchist tries to discredit a theory as being fringe.

  • @OldSchopenhauer Actually, he's upholding the obvious theory of climate change, which is represented by science

  • @Nightversionn Except there are no actual "climate change denialists".

    At any rate, the position should be argued with evidence and not an appeal to authority. I'm rather tired of people resorting to fallacious arguments like "All the scientific authorities agree with this position (except the ones that don't, but they're nutjobs that don't count), and only madmen would ever debate the consensus." Use evidence, not herd mentality.

  • @OldSchopenhauer No, there are few left aren't there? Climate deniers will disappear soon enough just like the flat earthers did once somebody sailed around the globe

  • @Nightversionn Oh, so now they're just "climate deniers". People that don't believe in climate. I got you. ; )

  • @OldSchopenhauer Well, you must be talking about actual skeptics, look no further for the scientific community. Scientists by nature all are skeptics.  I'm talking about the global warming deniers (oil industry sponsored trolls) that actually aren't deniers, they are just paid to lie every day on youtube that we shouldn't care about the issue. But you do have deniers who are genuine deniers, that is people out in the public who aren't paying attention

  • @Nightversionn Let me make a request. Can you argue for anthropogenic global warming using evidence?

    I don't have any investment in the issue one way or the other, I simply don't care for this style of argumentation. It's nothing but a series of appeals to authority, straw man arguments, and ad hominem attacks.

  • @OldSchopenhauer Why don't you read up on the NASA link? Or you just want to argue endlessly like deniers do. It's not ad hom, you are a denier

  • @Nightversionn I never even denied climate change.

    Which articles would you suggest?

  • @Nightversionn Scientists are always skeptics, so being skeptical of them is unskeptical. It is only by unshaken faith in the scientific community and peer review process that one can be a true skeptic! Or else you're just a denialist.

  • @FreeVonHelton hm? ? If you're a rational person you are a skeptic of everything, there is no unshaken faith in anything. As for science, medicine, frontiers in space travel, and so forth, I will have to go with the scientific consensus, as well as what they have to say about global warming

  • "As for science, medicine, frontiers in space travel, and so forth, I will have to go with the scientific consensus, as well as what they have to say about global warming"

    There is no "consenes" in science abiet in the theoretical ones that have yet to do actual verification and testing

    THe COnsenus of the IPCC was a political one,not a scientific one and it was for the purpouse of recommending funding the verification and testing of possible AGW and possible impacts = $10 billion in funding

  • @FreeVonHelton Also, about deniers, denialism is an intentional ignoring of the truth where the deniers are just looking for whatever angle they find to attack, with a predetermined and fixed stance. Clearly denialism is founded in dishonesty. That shouldn't tolerated in reasoned discourse. It has nothing to do with honest skepticism which all scientists are by definition

  • It's not like that.There are the more modest scientists who don't jump on the news to say human beings are responsable for climate change and there are those who do, who get a real chunk of money to militate for suprastate green oligarchic institutionalism and policy.The recent discoveries at CERN show how much climate models are fake. The climate is changing, but the cosmos has a bigger impact on Earth than human activity. You don't have to be an "environmentalist" to care about the environment

  • @OldSchopenhauer All the institutions agree. Take just one, NASA

    .

    Google NASA, the evidence of climate change (NASA dot gov)

  • Comment removed

  • Evidence / impacts of climate change series:

    .

    Summer Arctic sea ice melt at or near record

    .

    Arctic sea ice this summer melted to a record low extent or will come a close second, two different research institutes said on Tuesday, confirming a trend which could yield an ice-free summer within a decade.

    .

    Reuters

    14 September 2011

  • @Nightversionn Reuters lie, people die.

  • I did years of research and Al Gore has no penis. Many don't believe it, but they are just in penile denile. Or penisers if you wish......

  • 311 the World woke up and decided NO NUKES NO FLUKES We ask for the END OF THE NUCLEAR NIGHTMARE ON EARTH.We DEMAND THE END OF TOXIC POWER SYSTEMS ON EARTH. Let us BAN HYDRO FRACKING IN AMERICA as this POISONS MILLIONS OF GALLONS OF WATER Let us DEMAND THE END OF THE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL CORPORATE COMPLEX NOW. Let us DEMAND THE END OF ENDLESS WARS ON HUMANKIND Let us DEVELOP IN UNITY the Energy of SOLAR, MAGNETIC, WIND TURBINE,GEO THERMAL& HYDRO KINETIC 4ALL POWER

  • Humanity needs nuclear energy. The noosphere requires the mastering of nuclear processes in order to literally create resources. We won't be able to bring life to other planets/satelites without nuclear energy.

  • The recent discoveries at CERN show how much climate models have nothing to do with reality. (they are arbitrarily created and propagated).

  • Comment removed

  • Yet, some how between 1975 and 1998 the warming trend we experienced was magically due to increased c02 emissions, and was not a natural trend in any way. This is quite a leap of faith.

    So... let me get this right. Natural warming can bring us from a mini ice age into a warm period which peaked about 1945, then cools for the next 30 years, until magically when it warms again it is almost entirely due to humans.

    I don't buy it folks... "Consensus" or not.

  • An ice age would bring ice bergs down as low as Seattle, Washington, mass frozen tundras, limited growing seasons, and bitter cold winters. The mini ice age of Europe and the northern latitudes were renown for their harsh and tough winters where the river in London froze over. But it started to warm up in 1850 (when c02 was low) and by 1940 was comperable to today's climate. Extreme heat waves in the 30's and 40's were recorded in North America especially. This was all natural, not man made.

  • After we warmed from the last ice age 10,000 years ago, the peak warming seems to have occurred between 8,000 and 4,000 years ago, so during the agricultural and bronze age boom when the first great Human civilizations appeared on the earth, such as Sumer, Akkad, Egypt, the Minoans etc. It may have been considerably warmer than it is today by several deg F.

    If anything, a warmer planet is conducive to the health and growth of plants and other organisms. An ice age would be worse.

  • Evidence / impacts of climate change series: .

    Study questions credentials of climate-change skeptics

    .

    The hundreds of academics who sign warnings for politicians to delay action on slashing greenhouse gas emissions do not have the same expertise as those who say human activity is causing global warming, says a new study to be released in the Proceedings of the U.S. National Academy of Scientists.

    .

    Canwest News Service

    22 June 2010

  • Comment removed

  • "The hundreds of academics ... politicians to delay action...do not have the same expertise as those who say human activity is causing global warming"

    No, there are a lot of tlking heads on both sides,but the ones I find interesting are the ones that claimed they were duped by IPCC to sign off on something they didn't neccisarily agree with....Like Christy

    SUmmary report for policy makers isn't a "Scientific research paper",it's a memo

    IPCC is a UN commitie, not a "Scientific Organization"

  • I even find the mean global surface temperature to be a joke as well.

    There were like 6,000 temperature stations reporting in 1985 globally, and now in 2011 there are barely 1,500 reporting world wide -- and the 75% reduction in temperature stations happened siginficantly in the Russian far east and china. Some of the coldest places on earth.

    How could this statistically not effect the average global mean surface temp calculations of the IPCC?

  • ' mean global surface temperature to be a joke as well."

    That what happens when University faculty volunteering their time on a political commitie confusesenviromental climate,"The CLimate&weather variability as "the same thing"

    Las Vegas is still a Desert "Climate" but it gets down to 30f in winter now cause of "Climate Variability" which can cause local -/+20f swings

    "The CLimate" or Average tempature of Earth is currently 15c,gets down to 12c (Ice Age) goes to 18c(Interglaciation peak)

  • So then, C02 is going to vary considerably in which region, which climate, moisture, and environment, aka desert, lakes, or jungle etc... There are so many variables here it seems way too complex to use something as simplistic as a global "390 ppm" when it is so all over the map given just one location to another.

  • 'There are so many variables here it seems way too complex to use something as simplistic as a global "390 ppm" when it is so all over the map given just one location to another"

    Yes and Ibuki and Canx-2 are already showing that the averaging is full of shit

    Oh and not coming from human cities but ocean and vegitation "exhales" and "inhales"

    There is one where right in the middle of the Amazon the CO2 levels Spike into 500ppm,same for right in the middle of the ocean...no cars or factories

  • @TheRealArchAngel

    Thanks for all this great info. I was reading the last 3 pages of comments.

    Yeah, I think it's clear that the whole global warming agenda is too far removed from people's top list of priorities now that the economy is receding into a slipper mess, and with the food prices, revolutions and wars going on, having a job and putting food on the table is # 1. Voting for more taxes on a non issue is the last thing anyone would with half a cerebrum would do.

  • "Voting for more taxes on a non issue is the last thing anyone would with half a cerebrum would do."

    Politicains love to raise taxes when they think they can fget away with them

    Governmen did raises taxes during the 2007 "biofuel Iniative" and Fined "big Oil" and the Environuts cheered....until gas started to climb to $5 a gallo then they got all upset again...lol

    Problem with CO2 Tax was Industry demanded tax on actual exhaust measured instead of bullshit EPA estimates & the EPA backed off

  • I wouldn't doubt if the Pacific north West, and the Redwoods have around 500 ppm, since they have the most biomass and tallest tree forests in the United States according to some of the recent ICEsat, Terra, and Aqua satellites.

    I think it's pretty cool they can use Vegetation Canopy Lidar to map trees and forests. That would be a fun job tracking down the world's tallest tree based on millions of data points. They used plane deployed Lidar to find the champion redwoods in 2006.

  • ": wouldn't doubt if the Pacific north West, and the Redwoods have around 500 ppm"

    The Equater co2 almost uniformly spikes to 600ishppm during the summer while the co2 near the poles is low and drops even mre during the winter

    The most important thing is the ppm is relatively uniform except for co2 gushes from tectonic activity or vegetatian exhaling (plants exhale at night,when they hybernate,when they die)

    THere is no spike of co2 over cities during trafic hour noticable(as of yet)

  • The current Mana Loa site which is the most well known c02 monitoring station, is located on an "active volcano" ... Perhaps we need more stations to accurately monitor co2 ppm to get more independent results as good science would require.

  • "Perhaps we need more stations to accurately monitor co2 ppm to get more independent results as good science would require."

    The Real Scientists trying to verify the Consensus of OPpinion/hypothises have done 1 better

    Ibuki, launched January 2009 will sample 100,000 points on earth until 2013

    Canx-2,launched November 2009,also is sampling co2 from 100,000 point on earth

    Together as apart of the "A-Train" they will generateda a real world co2 map to compare to "Climate model" ones

  • @TheRealArchAngel

    Sweet. What will the AGW science community do if it shows a rather different reality than their models suggest?

  • "Sweet. What will the AGW science community do if it shows a rather different reality than their models suggest?"

    Soesn't matter

    Every country stuptd enough to enact "Cap and trade: and carbon taxes suffered Economically with the US NMOvember 2007 "Cap and Trade" causing the near world economic collapse in October 2008 and the US June "Cap and Trade" caused current world recession

    No politican is going to touch the subject with a 10 foot pole,Democrats lost the house for supporting "AGW"

  • Launch missiles at the satellites to bring them down?

  • "Launch missiles at the satellites to bring them down?"

    lol

    IGood luck considering a lot of the "A-Train" sattilites are tiny compared to their outdated brethere bing the size of a house.

    THink they put Ibuki in space with a model rocket cause of it's size (lol,overexageration)

    Canx-2 was a college project,if I remember correctly (as in college kids built the thing from "off the shelf parts") and is likewise small

    Lucky 2 about this "demodulizatio"

    NASA OCO is "missing"("misfire")

  • @TheRealArchAnge

    When are the results of these data sets scheduled to be published?

  • data(dot)gosat(dot)nies(dot)go­(dot)jp/GosatBrowseImage/brows­eImage/XCO2_L3(dot)gif

    The co2 variances is not concentrated over cities and swings by seasons even over the oceans with high conentration point apearing in the middlke of nowhere away from factories an cars (mother nature farted)

  • oh and if you notice in the animation overlay, Co2 consentration goes up globally in the summer months then drops in the winter

    This is because Co2 is heat sensitive and more of it enters evaporation/ercipitation with warmer conditions bringing it out of it's sinks while colder weather makes it condense and sink back where is came from

    When there Is interglaciation the Warming Planet lets more co2 circultate

    When Ice ages come Co2 sinks back into it's sinks thus no CO2 in a ICe Age

  • News:

    .

    WALRUSES haul-out three weeks early, global warming blamed

    .

    An extremely early sea ice melt-off has sent thousands of Pacific walruses onto the beaches of NW Alaska, placing pups in danger of being crushed on the crowded shoreline for the fourth year out of the past five due to the abnormal weather conditions.

    This year's walrus haul-out..comes a full three weeks earlier than last year's -- a potent symbol, environmental groups say -- that global warming is at work

  • @Nightversionn

    Oh no. They couldn't possibly have survived the Holocene warming epoch of 8,000 years ago, and they certainly won't survive today's evil temperatures.

  • It seems that the late Dr. Beck, although some of his research my have been off, has been given quite a cold shoulder by the science community because he dared challenge the proposition that atmospheric c02 was always a neat 270-280 ppm for the past 600,000 years. His readings, even if 1& are reliable, demonstrate 300+ ppm must have occured in the past like we see today -- Without cars and cities causing it.

  • Real world observation and verifiable tests and measurements of physical systems are always extremely important when conducting science.

  • Green Earth ~ NASA satellite study shows how the Earth has greened over the last 30 years possibly due to the CO2 ( natural fertiliser ) that has benefitted the flora which ultimately benefits the fauna ~ a greenhouse grower boosts CO2 and temperature to do this way above natural levels yet these doomsayers crap themselves because their masters have manipulated their minds to their advantage ~ wake up and smell the BS !! what are you Sheep??

  • " NASA satellite study shows how the Earth has greened over the last 30 years possibly due to the CO2"

    No,the earth core is generating more heat then usual which is causing faster plate tectonics resulting in earthqaukes, more volcanic action, and more warmth enthering the OCeans and air

    CO2 comes out with the heat and dislodges from it's deep sea sinks and soil sinks as it gets warmer...its a passenger,nor the cause

    Warmer Earth is better for plants,co2 is along for ride

  • But we know the sun has no real effect on the earth's warming and cooling cycles, so let's put that aside for now.

  • So much for Noam Chomsky.

    Too bad, he's done some good work in other areas.

  • Thanks to Noam Chomsky on some important insights into the issue

  • Climate science has become the Vatican. Al Gore is the Pope. Do not question. Conform.

    At the same time you have actors like Palin and Limbaugh who pee on all scientific logic. That's an absolutist outlook Chomsky is promoting.

    Reality tends to be gray.

  • @GarfoyleZanderfield

    Chomsky wasn't exaggerating when he said the percents, about 98% of climate scientists say global warming is man-made, it's a matter of science not "lets all come in the middle".

  • @AndroidPolitician

    You mean 97% of the 24 scientists that head the IPCC? Good lord man. Half of them are under investigation. You don't run science by consensus, you must constantly test, prod, and pinch the claims to their absolute limits, but that's just me. Maybe I'm wrong.

  • @GarfoyleZanderfield

    No I mean out of a sample of about a thousand climate scientists.

  • @AndroidPolitician

    Oh, then I am wrong.

    It was a "matter of science" back in the 30's that the Jewish race was inferior to the Aryan Race.... Several million corpses attest to these scientific truths. Margaret Sanger, Georges Vacher de Lapouge, and other racialists were absolutely thrilled with Adolf and his popular science at the time. Consensus science is certainly the way to go. May Lord Gore send his blessings upon thy household to the third generation, Amen.

  • @GarfoyleZanderfield

    Eugenics was certainly not the "consensus" among scientists but it was a popular cultural belief. In fact, global warming is the exact opposite, 98% of climatologists know it's real but most regular people don't.

  • @AndroidPolitician

    Glonal Warming: A once popular cultural belief.

  • "Glonal Warming: A once popular cultural belief."

    Kind of hard to giva a fuck about global warming when you lost your job, the Uneployment office is trying to screw you over, the bank is trying to forclose on your house cause your 3 payments behind,and, most of all, JLO and her Hubby broke up/SNooky's Pregnat/and one of the Jersey shore people died..lol

    The News Networks doing a stary on AGW every 20 minutes after AL Gore won Acadamy and Peace priize caused the "Fad"

    Then "Bank Crises" came

  • @TheRealArchAngel

    I actually would still believe in absolute catastrophic anthropogenic global warming had I not heard of climategate and then read more about Al Gore and his video. i just never questioned the science, like most good law abiding Americans, that is until I started reading more and more about the different viewpoints. Obviously I contend there is a human contribution to the increase in c02 in the last century, and that this would add to a warming planet sounds plausible.

  • ' I contend there is a human contribution to the increase in c02 in the last century"

    No,

    Physics class tends to recite chemical theories whethter or not tested and "Green house gas" is a major doosey that experimental Physics led to the "Zeroth Law" (you can't double a mass in volume to make it asorb more heat then it's maximum threashold)..as in "Zeroth Law" was created in falsifying GHG (but they still ":preach" it)

    That Combustion"Creates co2"is also Physics nonsense,it makes heat+force

  • @TheRealArchAngel

    Oh, then my contention was based on deceit. I'll buy that. Hey if these are the guys who pulled off climategate, I will re evaluate my contention.

  • Also, if I read of C02 measurements going back to the 1800's, although some were inaccurare by 20 to 100 ppm, Dr. Ernst Georg Beck (one of the lesser known scientists) investigated thousands of chemical c02 measuremnets which may suggest C02 wasn't always a "tidy" and neat "280 ppm" without fluctuation as conventional climate change proponents suggest. I can't verify measurements done before 1958, but there were lots of 300 to 400 ppm readings according to his investigation, over places like sea

  • "Also, if I read of C02 measurements going back to the 1800's, although some were inaccurare by 20 to 100 ppm"

    Depending on Where,what time of day,tempature,humidity,elevati­on,wind speed and tempature co2 parts per million can be anywhere from 0ppm to 900ppm..even more near teconic rifts and volcanos or co2 sinks

    Trees eat co2 so ppm drops around them for instance

    Anything from 1800-1904? is proxy and based on Ice cores and can only tell you how much was trapped not how much was in enviroment

  • @TheRealArchAngel

    Good point. So Proxy data from Ice samples have given estimates of 280 ppm. So then, the highly publicized Mana Loa site is probably contaminated by that volcano, and giving readings higher than might be elsewhere?

  • "I can't verify measurements done before 1958, but there were lots of 300 to 400 ppm readings according to his investigation, over places like sea"

    The major amusement that I have with the "PPM" thing is that it only shows how much co2 i riding the Evaporation/percipitation cycle..or in the case of the Ocean,the Ocean Conveyer,not how much there is on earth

    If that "390ppm" was accurate,that means there is 1.5trillion ton co2 in air of 5000 trillion atmosphere

  • @TheRealArchAngel

    Interesting. 

  • "there were lots of 300 to 400 ppm readings according to his investigation, over places like sea"

    That's not unusual

    THe Ocean floor is the major surface co2 sink and thousands upon thousands of trillion of tons of co2 rests down their in the form of "co2 hydrate"

    The "700ppm" everyone is alrmnist about is thousands of trillions of tons of co2 in 3000 million trillion tons of water

    that 400ppm is co2 riding evaporation and the air flies up the ppm drops as Co2 is heavier then air

  • @TheRealArchAngel

    Aha.. That helps put things in perspective.

    If I recall, some have even estimated that the Jurassic and Carboniferous periods (when the earth was covered in jungles and red woods, with high volcanic activity) the earth had 1500 to 3000 CO2 ppm.

    Estimates on average surface temps go from 65 to 70 F.

  • "some have even estimated that the Jurassic and Carboniferous periods (when the earth was covered in jungles and red woods, with high volcanic activity) the earth had 1500 to 3000 CO2 ppm"

    The Heat increase was from the thousands of miles of constantly eruting magma from plate points not the CO2 that was also being vented out as a result of "Interglation overpeak".from the core and mantle going absolutly haywire and venting out all that heat

    Earth was 20f hotter the Dinosaurs died from Ice Age

  • "Earth was 20f hotter the Dinosaurs died from Ice Age"

    The "COnsensus" by university faculty that a giant meter hitting the earth 65 million years ago not matching geological and antropological records is a perfect example of how consensus can be rooted in bullshit

    Geologically there is the "KT BOundry" everywhere in the world you dig

    Dinosaur fossils stop 10,000 years before the KT boundry...as in they were extinct before the KT hit...but the "Consensus" now says otherwise(rollseyes)

  • No doubt this warm planet of Jurassic some approx 150 millions of years ago was largely do to volcanic activity and not the evil trees and animals.

  • "That Combustion"Creates co2"is also Physics nonsense,it makes heat+force"

    It's another "Chemical Thoery" that is not observed in Chemistry nor Engineering

    In the case of the car the gasoline is aerolized into a mist with oxygen and is shot into a piston and then it is compressed and the spark ignites the gasoline mist that causes te force to blow the piston open then the caremelized carbon junk(no o2 to oxidize)left is ejected into the ECM

    takes fusion or Electrolisys to make"CO2 from CO

  • @TheRealArchAngel

    Interesting. So then, would you agree that it might very well be possible, that C02 readings before 1900 have been cherry picked to represent the lowest average values by modern proponent of Climate change? I mean Dr. beck's research is pretty interesting, even if these are old measurements, they open the mind to other possibilities at least.

  • "Interesting. So then, would you agree that it might very well be possible, that C02 readings before 1900 have been cherry picke"

    no,that ie Doesn't matter at all

    These "experts" actually believe that 1.5 triliion tons of co2(500 billion tons of that supposedly "added by humans)in 5000 trillion tons of air cans cause warming in that air and cause the 300 million trillion tons of ocean to heat 2 degrees

    "Climate" is regulated by Earth's core emmisions,not co2 leaving sinks cause of warming

  • @TheRealArchAngel

    Oh wow. Thank you for conveying the numbers to me. The math doesn't add up at all... our alleged 500 billion ton addition making 300 million trillion tons heat 2 deg... That is a stretch.

  • The Obama volt, a dying breed... A true American classic, almost as renown as the Tucker...

  • "A true American classic, almost as renown as the Tucker"

    No

    ucker just had trouble getting financing to go big

    GM Volt got the President of the US that took over GW and gacve the Company to the Unions and put millions onto it's development and even shut down domestic drilling and making coal more expensive as well to drive the cost of gas up to make the Electric Vehicle look more apealing and,still,the majority of people dont want the nearly $70,000 glorified golf cart

    (HINT:mAKE A suv version)

  • Well, I will respectfully, and in some cases disrespectfully, disagree with this alleged scientific consensus.

  • @GarfoyleZanderfield

    So the vast some of scientific evidence doesn't convince you? Do you disagree with smoking causing cancer?