@smokingpotatoes Sasquatchs are immortal. they emit no heat and they do not shed. ;-) your observations are troubling to us believers, but film, sightings, foot prints and vocalizations are difficult to explain without a bigfoot. very very soon DNA from hair or scat will prove to science that these mysterious apes do roam the forests.
Yeah you were right- that orange thing is creepy........lets hope, since it's taken at such a close range, that it's some dude in costume......we'll real NEVER see a Squatch pic taken from that close! People can't seem to move........lol
I would laugh if people were pulling a bifgoot hoax like most the pics in this video apart from the patterson footage, and a real bigfoot came out and attacked them.
Hahaha, how fun it is to see the very ridiculous PostToastie in here, everyone please shed a tear for this moronic middle aged man, he blocks anyone who doesn't agree with him or believe in bigfoot, a true waste of human skin cells, he can't even hold a debate.
Sounds like every wanker on YouTube who believes in an invisible ape! Those idiots can't take one ounce of reason or common sense. Take a picture of a blurry shadow and they'll call it bigfoot.
he looks like an early adaptation of a gorilla but never fully adapted, that'd explain y he can walk on two feet, kinda reminds me of planet of the apes.
Nice job with frame 352, I haven't looked closely at the color version of that frame since I spotted the baby on patty's chest in the MK Davis, B&W enhancements. At 0:10 - 0:12 one can clearly see the baby kneeling on her right breast.
Orangutans, gorillas and other large primates have incredible strength in their upper bodies, so if you invade their territory, you should leave immediately unless you want to get slapped silly and violated by probing fingers! Possibly bitten even.
The howling at 51 to about 1:05 is the sound that I have heard a few times. A call known as the "Ohio Howl" is very close to that one. This squatch sounds like he is hurt. Very painful wail. I can only say that even the believers have some doubt in the back of their mind..I did..until you see one. That changes the whole ballgame.
Bob Heironimus,the man who tried to get his 15 minutes of fame by saying that he was in the Patterson film,not only has NO proof,he has changed his story almost every time he speaks of it. He is a joke. Regardless of what some idiots say on here or elsewhere,science has never proven the film to be fake,in fact,most evidence available from the films suggests that it is virtually impossible to have done that it 1967. Rewards have been offered for anyone who can duplicate it..still unclaimed. REAL.
The Glutes power upright walking. This is why bipedal humans have such large glutes relative to the other apes. In the Patterson film, the region of the glutes does not flex at all as the creature walks, and is totally independent from the legs. This is a damn good indicator of a suit...
The rippling muscle claim is based in part on the suit riding up on the upper thigh. Claims were made that the creature had torn a muscle and it was moving oddly due to this. Think about that a bit.
Bob Heironimus admitted he was in the costume. He matches the dimensions very well, as he can be easily superimposed onto the suit standing in the same way.
You can see the costume material bunching up on the upper right thigh as the creature walks...
Chris Walas, Hollywood costume makers said it was a suit, and said the myth that the suit would need to be better than what they even have now decades later is false. He said they even had better suits even then,
I take the same stand on all reports, pictures & vids of Cryptids/para-phenom. Skeptic 1st because the likelihood that its real is low anyway. 2nd use all means 2 explain why it isnt real. 3rd use all means 2 explain what it is really. Last if all logical explanations fail then the illogical can B true. The best known piece of evidence is the Patterson-Gimlin film from Oct 67. This film holds up 2 each & every attempt 2 disprove it. The unlikely explanation becomes the most likely. Its real.
Its a common belief (one that I subscribe 2) that sasquatch R nomadic. They probably move w/ the seasons & as food sources become available. Also, there is the belief by some that they bury their dead. I don't know about that. Seems unlikely 4 a primate of this type. It is always difficult 2 find carcasses of bears. Dead animals R quickly scavenged in the wild. Even bones R used as a calcium source by many rodents. This coupled w/ a small population makes finding remains very difficult.
Commonly known as "Samurai chatter"...strange. The pic at 1:09 is a stump. tThe man who took it said he couldn't understand why has dog was not going crazy at the sight of it...it was only when he got closer that he found that it was a stump...the dog knew there was nothing alive over there!
Excellent! Thanks! The stump explanation is dead on obviously correct! Good Job! BTW...I just showed my wife...she is not into BF at all. I showed her the pic at 1:09 and said, "Do you know what this is?" She goes, "Yeah, it's a stump."! Geez!
Great compilation. I'm glad you used footage of videos that are confusing the hell out of researchers, instead of proven hoaxes, like on some other compilations around here.
Real
Bikeman19792008 5 months ago
Myth!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
mjdmjdmjdmjdmjd 9 months ago
@smokingpotatoes Sasquatchs are immortal. they emit no heat and they do not shed. ;-) your observations are troubling to us believers, but film, sightings, foot prints and vocalizations are difficult to explain without a bigfoot. very very soon DNA from hair or scat will prove to science that these mysterious apes do roam the forests.
cunnidvd 9 months ago
Reality
jb0609 9 months ago
I think bigfoot is real, but very elusive.
darknightten 1 year ago
Yeah you were right- that orange thing is creepy........lets hope, since it's taken at such a close range, that it's some dude in costume......we'll real NEVER see a Squatch pic taken from that close! People can't seem to move........lol
TheCajun124 1 year ago
Dude what's that song that starts at 1:30 ? sick song!
stealthboy19 1 year ago
The last photo look realistic, kinda.. i don't even know to believe or not ;D
M4nT3Liz 1 year ago
give me a fuckin break
MsRayan01 1 year ago
Some of those are fake, but maybe Bigfoot IS real =3 x]
I liek myths, lol :)
Morningdew1435 2 years ago
I would laugh if people were pulling a bifgoot hoax like most the pics in this video apart from the patterson footage, and a real bigfoot came out and attacked them.
chrisjc2007 2 years ago
Hahaha, how fun it is to see the very ridiculous PostToastie in here, everyone please shed a tear for this moronic middle aged man, he blocks anyone who doesn't agree with him or believe in bigfoot, a true waste of human skin cells, he can't even hold a debate.
GilbertSyndrome 2 years ago
Sounds like every wanker on YouTube who believes in an invisible ape! Those idiots can't take one ounce of reason or common sense. Take a picture of a blurry shadow and they'll call it bigfoot.
cochranexyz 2 years ago
he looks like an early adaptation of a gorilla but never fully adapted, that'd explain y he can walk on two feet, kinda reminds me of planet of the apes.
brianthejokestar13 2 years ago
weird ass video
curtisthompson34 2 years ago
Nice job with frame 352, I haven't looked closely at the color version of that frame since I spotted the baby on patty's chest in the MK Davis, B&W enhancements. At 0:10 - 0:12 one can clearly see the baby kneeling on her right breast.
PostToastie 3 years ago
i dont see anything on 0:25
smexymaz 3 years ago
Orangutans, gorillas and other large primates have incredible strength in their upper bodies, so if you invade their territory, you should leave immediately unless you want to get slapped silly and violated by probing fingers! Possibly bitten even.
ayshortier 3 years ago 3
The howling at 51 to about 1:05 is the sound that I have heard a few times. A call known as the "Ohio Howl" is very close to that one. This squatch sounds like he is hurt. Very painful wail. I can only say that even the believers have some doubt in the back of their mind..I did..until you see one. That changes the whole ballgame.
Methadone4Life 3 years ago 3
Bob Heironimus,the man who tried to get his 15 minutes of fame by saying that he was in the Patterson film,not only has NO proof,he has changed his story almost every time he speaks of it. He is a joke. Regardless of what some idiots say on here or elsewhere,science has never proven the film to be fake,in fact,most evidence available from the films suggests that it is virtually impossible to have done that it 1967. Rewards have been offered for anyone who can duplicate it..still unclaimed. REAL.
Methadone4Life 3 years ago 2
Some more:
The Glutes power upright walking. This is why bipedal humans have such large glutes relative to the other apes. In the Patterson film, the region of the glutes does not flex at all as the creature walks, and is totally independent from the legs. This is a damn good indicator of a suit...
The rippling muscle claim is based in part on the suit riding up on the upper thigh. Claims were made that the creature had torn a muscle and it was moving oddly due to this. Think about that a bit.
Lagomort 3 years ago
A few quick points on the film:
Bob Heironimus admitted he was in the costume. He matches the dimensions very well, as he can be easily superimposed onto the suit standing in the same way.
You can see the costume material bunching up on the upper right thigh as the creature walks...
Chris Walas, Hollywood costume makers said it was a suit, and said the myth that the suit would need to be better than what they even have now decades later is false. He said they even had better suits even then,
Lagomort 3 years ago
It is sad that you used such logic on the Montauk Monster issue,..yet believe in bigfoot.
Lagomort 3 years ago
I take the same stand on all reports, pictures & vids of Cryptids/para-phenom. Skeptic 1st because the likelihood that its real is low anyway. 2nd use all means 2 explain why it isnt real. 3rd use all means 2 explain what it is really. Last if all logical explanations fail then the illogical can B true. The best known piece of evidence is the Patterson-Gimlin film from Oct 67. This film holds up 2 each & every attempt 2 disprove it. The unlikely explanation becomes the most likely. Its real.
Sazqwatch 3 years ago
its fake any way
pbchris4719 3 years ago
Its a common belief (one that I subscribe 2) that sasquatch R nomadic. They probably move w/ the seasons & as food sources become available. Also, there is the belief by some that they bury their dead. I don't know about that. Seems unlikely 4 a primate of this type. It is always difficult 2 find carcasses of bears. Dead animals R quickly scavenged in the wild. Even bones R used as a calcium source by many rodents. This coupled w/ a small population makes finding remains very difficult.
Sazqwatch 3 years ago
whats 1:32 from???
CarolinaSkunkApe 3 years ago
i think its santa man ... and the baby in the tree is santaBaby
FredSaarik 3 years ago
1:35 CREEPY very CREEPY
XxRedeemerxX90 3 years ago
arent those normal gorillas??
davenegro123 3 years ago
silver star mt photo great great vid
personwhoknowspeople 3 years ago
Commonly known as "Samurai chatter"...strange. The pic at 1:09 is a stump. tThe man who took it said he couldn't understand why has dog was not going crazy at the sight of it...it was only when he got closer that he found that it was a stump...the dog knew there was nothing alive over there!
joeyvader 3 years ago
Excellent! Thanks! The stump explanation is dead on obviously correct! Good Job! BTW...I just showed my wife...she is not into BF at all. I showed her the pic at 1:09 and said, "Do you know what this is?" She goes, "Yeah, it's a stump."! Geez!
Sazqwatch 3 years ago
Yeah...my wife couldn't be less interested in Bigfoot either...crazy people!
joeyvader 3 years ago
the picture at 1:09 kinda looks like a dwaf from lord of the rings.....hahahaha
this was a good video
BADTimmyD 3 years ago
I didnt saw the baby sasquatch on the tree
themustangguy123 4 years ago
i must admit for some dam american you do very nice work
rcac2817 4 years ago
nice video man.
those vocalizations never fail to creep the hell out of me lol
timjones066 4 years ago
Great compilation. I'm glad you used footage of videos that are confusing the hell out of researchers, instead of proven hoaxes, like on some other compilations around here.
Good work.
TampaRed 4 years ago
Loosely known as the "sierra-growl." This growl/whistle combination was recorded in the High Sierras in California by Alan Berry, 1978.
Sazqwatch 4 years ago
Great video!
cabo02 4 years ago
i believe
rcac2817 4 years ago
Reality. Next question. :-)
georgiabigfootteam 4 years ago