Gatekeepers are only effective if they can maintain the trust of those they are blocking. Ms. Goodman panics because she cannot allow herself to view evidence. If she were shown evidence, she could no longer feign ignorance of it. So merely by showing her the network aired 2nd plane, whose nose exits the other side of the WTC intact, she would no longer be useful as a gatekeeper to her employers. She avoids evidence because it would end her current career. Controlled opposition.
the reason, thank goodness, she doesn't believe the evidence-free conspiracy theory is that it lacks evidence... when two massive sky-scrapers come down with two massive airplanes, it's not a surprise, to those who value evidence, that a building very close by would catch some debris & be destroyed as a result. Evidence is important.
Being it is obvious that you don't want your predetermined views to be challenged, my advice it to stick to big corporate media, that way you can constantly have your ignorance regurgitated back to you at all times.
Whether or not the Bush administration planned and executed 9/11 is immaterial. The reason that it is immaterial is this reason: Even without such a conspiracy it's guilty of numerous criminal acts for which its members should answer.
Of course, given the structure of American jurisprudence ($ talks; everyone else gofuckyourselves), and the hourly ass-licking American politicians give to their corporate overlords, it's doubtful justice will ever be done.
i can't stand the arrogant certainty of 911 truther's who KNOW that 911 was an inside job with more certainty than physicists have of gravity existing...
Why don't these gatekeepers of the cult get out onto the streets protesting & demanding to see the 100+ pentagon camera's instead of attacking left wing media personalities whose reporting/books have only taught people.
It's pathetic going up to these people with camera's @ book signings, forcefully asking "do you believe?" like some religion
@sponsoredwalk1 i think they should leave her alone to a degree, i think she probably does think its an inside job, but shes being realistic, and not coming out and saying her opinion because she would instantly be tarred and feathered by the mainstream media. I agree with what shes doing, lets be fucking effective.
@MrBlinkmiss I agree, this also goes up for Howard Zinn (R.I.P.)and Noam Chomsky. They resisted to give their opinion about 9/11, but in their hearts they also knew and know that this tragedy has left us with way too many questions and controversies. Let's get an investigation started with "lucky" Larry Silverstein? He's the biggest person of interest in this whole case! Remember the sudden collapse of building 7, that's how it all started........
don't you think the whole 911 thing really supports the statement "its not seeing is believing, its believing is seeing" if you believe the mainstream news would never lie to you about such a massively important event; that enables you to see 3 towers collapse in their own footprint at a speed close to freefall and not believe that carefully laid out explosives did it. It's astonishing how easy people are manipulated.
You're an idiot if you think that Goodman, Chomsky and Zinn are "gatekeepers", simply because they're not devoting their lives to your cause but to a much brother range of causes and don't dwell on this 9/11 truth shit.
I think she knows whats going on and I don't think she's scared talk. I do think that she's in a difficult position being one of the largest alternative media sources out there. Think about it if she was to say it was an inside job her credibility gone and with it the validity of the issues she has raised over the years. On the other hand on can say what is hypocritical for her not to expose the truth regardless of the rammifications which is what got her to where she is thus far. tricky
Ok, not to pick on you, but this is the second of your videos I have checked out. First of all, you assume that watchers know what this is all about. Secondly, the audio is terrible. 3rd, there's no explanation in the info box that might explain things. 4th, you're clearly ambushing Amy, ignoring the fact that she needs to go. Not the way to interact with your audience or Amy. I suggest you think these little productions through before posting them. This approach helps no one.
This is totally unfair. I never would have known about Sibel Edmonds if it weren't for Amy Goodman. She's covered this issue for a long time. Just because she doesn't focus her reports on the 9/11 commission doesn't mean that you should bully her into covering the news the way you want her to. Furthermore, she tried bringing the Loose Change producers onto DNow, but they made complete fools of themselves in their conduct. This is not the way to get the support of legitimate indy journalism.
LMAO!!! \/\/\/\/
BillDaBurgerEater 3 weeks ago
Avoiding the evidence is the trademark of a fake.
StratusBlue 8 months ago
Gatekeepers are only effective if they can maintain the trust of those they are blocking. Ms. Goodman panics because she cannot allow herself to view evidence. If she were shown evidence, she could no longer feign ignorance of it. So merely by showing her the network aired 2nd plane, whose nose exits the other side of the WTC intact, she would no longer be useful as a gatekeeper to her employers. She avoids evidence because it would end her current career. Controlled opposition.
StratusBlue 8 months ago
the reason, thank goodness, she doesn't believe the evidence-free conspiracy theory is that it lacks evidence... when two massive sky-scrapers come down with two massive airplanes, it's not a surprise, to those who value evidence, that a building very close by would catch some debris & be destroyed as a result. Evidence is important.
tobynsaunders 9 months ago
Amy Goodman is a whore
brahmbhattbhavna 10 months ago
@brahmbhattbhavna
Being it is obvious that you don't want your predetermined views to be challenged, my advice it to stick to big corporate media, that way you can constantly have your ignorance regurgitated back to you at all times.
Yoseman1 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Whether or not the Bush administration planned and executed 9/11 is immaterial. The reason that it is immaterial is this reason: Even without such a conspiracy it's guilty of numerous criminal acts for which its members should answer.
Of course, given the structure of American jurisprudence ($ talks; everyone else gofuckyourselves), and the hourly ass-licking American politicians give to their corporate overlords, it's doubtful justice will ever be done.
bapyou 1 year ago
i can't stand the arrogant certainty of 911 truther's who KNOW that 911 was an inside job with more certainty than physicists have of gravity existing...
Why don't these gatekeepers of the cult get out onto the streets protesting & demanding to see the 100+ pentagon camera's instead of attacking left wing media personalities whose reporting/books have only taught people.
It's pathetic going up to these people with camera's @ book signings, forcefully asking "do you believe?" like some religion
sponsoredwalk1 1 year ago 2
@sponsoredwalk1 i think they should leave her alone to a degree, i think she probably does think its an inside job, but shes being realistic, and not coming out and saying her opinion because she would instantly be tarred and feathered by the mainstream media. I agree with what shes doing, lets be fucking effective.
MrBlinkmiss 1 year ago
@MrBlinkmiss I agree, this also goes up for Howard Zinn (R.I.P.)and Noam Chomsky. They resisted to give their opinion about 9/11, but in their hearts they also knew and know that this tragedy has left us with way too many questions and controversies. Let's get an investigation started with "lucky" Larry Silverstein? He's the biggest person of interest in this whole case! Remember the sudden collapse of building 7, that's how it all started........
josgvis 1 year ago
don't you think the whole 911 thing really supports the statement "its not seeing is believing, its believing is seeing" if you believe the mainstream news would never lie to you about such a massively important event; that enables you to see 3 towers collapse in their own footprint at a speed close to freefall and not believe that carefully laid out explosives did it. It's astonishing how easy people are manipulated.
MrBlinkmiss 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DennisDuine
they are gatekeepers. and 911 was an inside job. and amy as an
important and influential public persona, is aiding and abetting the
real perpetrators of 911. which means, she's lying through her
teeth when she says "we need to take media back". what she
really means is, "take media from corporations back (and put it
in the hands of the government). which itself is a good thing,
but why would she play down the importance of 9/11 truth?
i don't trust her. and never will again.
911reset 1 year ago
You're an idiot if you think that Goodman, Chomsky and Zinn are "gatekeepers", simply because they're not devoting their lives to your cause but to a much brother range of causes and don't dwell on this 9/11 truth shit.
DennisDuine 1 year ago
@DennisDuine
they are gatekeepers. and 911 was an inside job. and amy as an
important and influential public persona, is aiding and abetting the
real perpetrators of 911. which means, she's lying through her
teeth when she says "we need to take media back". what she
really means is, "take media from corporations back (and put it
in the hands of the government). which itself is a good thing,
but why would she play down the importance of 9/11 truth?
i don't trust her. and never will again.
911reset 1 year ago
I think she knows whats going on and I don't think she's scared talk. I do think that she's in a difficult position being one of the largest alternative media sources out there. Think about it if she was to say it was an inside job her credibility gone and with it the validity of the issues she has raised over the years. On the other hand on can say what is hypocritical for her not to expose the truth regardless of the rammifications which is what got her to where she is thus far. tricky
facts999 1 year ago
wtf
widdick 2 years ago
Why would you attack the only person in the media who speaks truth to power so powerfully? What is the point?
nourights 3 years ago
pfff...
I guess you don't know who funds her program.
CRAPCANNONS 3 years ago
who..?
ourpangea 2 years ago
Ok, not to pick on you, but this is the second of your videos I have checked out. First of all, you assume that watchers know what this is all about. Secondly, the audio is terrible. 3rd, there's no explanation in the info box that might explain things. 4th, you're clearly ambushing Amy, ignoring the fact that she needs to go. Not the way to interact with your audience or Amy. I suggest you think these little productions through before posting them. This approach helps no one.
afmafmafm 3 years ago
This is totally unfair. I never would have known about Sibel Edmonds if it weren't for Amy Goodman. She's covered this issue for a long time. Just because she doesn't focus her reports on the 9/11 commission doesn't mean that you should bully her into covering the news the way you want her to. Furthermore, she tried bringing the Loose Change producers onto DNow, but they made complete fools of themselves in their conduct. This is not the way to get the support of legitimate indy journalism.
mrmysterious3 3 years ago
/watch?v=MtMBFsoYw3E
DJ NicoHitler "Gassing 9/11 Family Members" ["Art" Mix]
911censored 3 years ago