What about the civilization they just discovered in south Africa.they carbon dated the site that dated to 200,000 years ago .we dont know shit about are species or what interaction previous versions of what we call human had with each other.
so does this mean when someone asks what my ethnicity is i can say "technically i'm african american?!?" even though i'm white. lmao, i mean if it's proven then why not?
I Dnt know bout the whole no time no space an no matter thing literally no one alive ever ever evvveerr will know that.. Same goes with the initial creation of earth, there's no hard evidence .. of either
Based on mtDNA evidence (Krings et al) humans did not evolve from chimps, neanderthals, gorillas or orangutans. There is no mtDNA extracted from an ape like common ancestor. An ape like common ancestor is just a speculation based on rate of mtDNA mutations which is not fully understood yet.
still have a hard time with the before the big bang there was not time or space idea, then what was there before the big bang, cause and effect and all, not that we can ever really know if there was anything before the big bang because everything that could have been there was probably annihilated in the process. i'll just quote the professor "The last protons should be decaying right now. and here we are the end of the universe......... (wow) unbelievable its a second big bang!"
@chrishillification They could SEE Yemen. It's a long distance for primitive people to cross, but they could see it. I don't know much about the Australia crossing, but the were fleeing the destruction from a large eruption, they obviously made it there, and it's the scientific consensus.
@chrishillification are you under the impression that primitive man was blind. Yemen was only a 10 mile crossing so they could obviously see it and australia was 100 miles away. surely with nothing obstructing there view they would be able to make out a land mass there too. just let go of your dogmas and think a little bit.
@kris6682 I live by the great lakes. I cant see across lake Erie surley the width of lake Erie is not 100 miles. I have been to lake Champlain. I cant see across it in most areas. And both of these are less than 100 miles and 10 miles
@chrishillification it has to do with perspective if you are higher up you can see farther. the fact that you think you couldnt see a distance such as ten mile is wrong. you would only need to be about 65 feet above sea level and the coasts of africa are littered with mountains.to see a distance of 100 miles you would need to be around 6500 feet above sea level. are you saying that there are no mountains in africa. btw lake champlain is 12 miles wide your just not high enough to see across it
the damn french arent goin to steal the basques glory...the solutreans werent french but basques(the dna proves it)..if they found skulls in southern france its because the basques also settled in france...
Science, on the other hand, focuses on repeated tests to prove certain theories wrong or incomplete.. It describes patterns of nature which do not change, and is backed with mountains of evidences.. Our real origin, as far as we know, dates back to billions of years and we have no physical access to these realms, thus, it is incredibly difficult to explain such complex processes with so little evidence.. Nevertheless, we are constantly gathering new evidences and rewriting our story of creation
Religion, is only as old as the first human who devised it based on radical ideas that were backed with absolutely no empirical evidence.. They often employ the use of an imaginary divine to back their claims.. And because as much as it cannot be proved, it also cannot be disprove, thereby compelling many to belief in it.. Over many time-tested failures in disproving the ideas, it became established fact..
When dealing with such extremely long time periods that dates so far back into the past and trying to probe realms of nature that we have absolutely no access to, our only hope is to study the remnants or evidences of these realms and by using the scientific method, explore what the evidences tell us about nature.. Religion, on the other hand, is based on ideology passed down for generations..
Hehe if you were paying attention.. Evolution takes place over a period of millions of years.. And it seems that earth is old enough to allow for life to evolve to what it is today.. Our history of biodiversity and human history dates back only to a few thousands of years.. What makes you think that there would be a significant change in species, much less any observable evolution to happen within such a short period of time?..
@thegreig: Among other things, the fact that recent molecular studies found that all extant humans who are non-African are carrying some H. neanderthalensis genes. H. sapiens and H. neaderthalensis interbread, and H. neaderthalensis lived in Europe and Eurasia. If all humans outside Africa had died out, it wouldn't be the case today that non-Africans carry neanderthal genes.
@thegreig: On that note then, a word of warning: whatever you see on YouTube regarding subjects like paleontology, archaeology, evolutionary biology, physical anthropology, etc, take with a grain of salt. There are active research programs in all of these areas, and new information is being discovered all the time. This video is very outdated. Your best place to get cool, up to date info is Scientific American online, and published text books in the bio/earth sciences.
My theory on what modern humanity calls drawings on cave walls (IE) Art or paintings is. That the drawings on the walls of the cave of our distant ancestors were not put there to be viewed as Art. But to be used as instructional symbols to TEACH hunting skills. Elaboration: If you look at how each symbol is used, and follow the example being shown in the drawings, those same examples can be used today to have successful hunts using the same type weapons. We may be viewing the 1st class rooms.
daogdaog There is overwhelming evidence of gradual evolution you need to read any good science book to understand that. You misunderstand the word species. You think each individual in a species is the same. They are not. Each has its own unique DNA and variation. It is only when a group emerges with an incompatible set of genes with others of its original genome that a new species occurs. The correct way to think of it is as a continuum of genetic mutation.
Don't want to be a pedant but it is more likely that initially wolves selected themselves for domestication. The least cautious wolves probably foraged for scraps of food in human camps and were tolerated for reasons we don't know. Over a long period of time these evolved traits of domesticity that allowed man to tame them. Its not the case that modern wolves were domesticated rather an ancestor that had co-evolved with humans.
If evolution is correct why are species distinct from each other with no evidence that they gradually evolved to the next species. Ever since apes are still apes, crocs are still crocs. Neandertals never interacted with modern man. Mutations are actually defects. If you have 11 fingers, it is a genetic defect. Dont expect other people will soon have 11 fingers too. If you cross breed horse and donkey you will get a sterile mule.
Okay- now I'm not a lecturer on this supject but I did study this last year at uni. This video isnt absolutely correct. A couple of points:
1. Waves of populations left africa. It wasnt a single group.
2. There are many different species of 'Modern humans'. One species- i think the species they mean here, left africa and moved along the coast towards malaysia, where there was another sp of modern human from a previous wave. The lack of meat changing stature should be taken with a pinch of salt.
@Bigdude1888 Maybe we don't descend from modern black people, but possibly a more primitive species of humans that we all split from, probably resembled black people more than it did other races, since we DO originate from Africa.
Sheer fantasy. There is no way we all came from a single mother in Africa. Besides everybody knows the Flying Spaghetti Monster created everybody & everything.
Before that explosion there was NO TIME..NOTHING.. Give me a break there is no such thing as "nothing" that explosion and if there ever was one..happened because of something..u dont just get an explosion out of nothing..
@EuropeanGuy87 Big bang wasn't an explosion. It was an inflation. Please, listen what Physicists say and you might be surprised. The theories aren't pulled from ass.
Europeans are definitely the latest evolution on the human tree..and the most sophisticated ...we accomplished the most things..while those aboriginal people were wild and had no idea we even existed..before we discover them..
2029- human brain is reverse engineered and AI achieves the same computations per second as the human brain. 2045-Human biology fully fused with technology.
Why do you have the first human as being black, I thought that thinking was changed. Also, I understand that the thinking of the extinction event of 65myo was not primarily the space rock, but that the space rock was the KO punch of an already failing system.
asshoes we came for god you may not belive it but it's true ya'll sitting up there making shit up. how and why did all this happen. we did not evolve, so ya'll think that on day monkeys just stood up lost all our fur then grow hair the develoed a differnt body mass languages looks and all that.
@manman4092 Domestic dogs were all selectively bred by humans from wolves. People that wanted small, cute wolves would take the smallest of the litters, then breed them with other small wolves, then take the smallest, cutest of that litter and repeat the process. Over time, they get smaller and cuter until like a 1000 years later you get a poodle. That's how evolution works. It's the small changes between parents and their kids. It took monkeys MILLIONS of years to become human.
@Slanguaj I like that you defend evolution, but I have a few problems with your statement. Evolution doesn't work by selective breeding. The main mechanism that drives evolution is natural selection along with other mechanisms for evolutionary change. Also, monkeys didn't "become human." We didn't evolve from monkeys or apes, but rather we share a common ancestor with them.
@Xsublime28xX You're being needlessly picky. Natural selection determines which animals will breed. I didn't say that humans selectively bred everything. If you trace our ancestry back far enough you will find an animal that by all modern definitions would be referred to as a monkey. Yes it wasn't a modern species of monkey, but it was a monkey.
@Slanguaj I'm not being picky. You gave an example of selective breeding and then you said "thats how evolution works". Well you're wrong, it doesn't work that way. If you can't explain evolution correctly, then don't do it.
@Xsublime28xX Apology accepted. I agree that I over simplified, but if you read the comment I was replying to (which says something like: monkeys one day became people) you might see that it was neccessary in that context. What I was attempting to describe was the way in which changes accumalate over many generations, and not so much why those changes take place.
@Slanguaj LOL! You God-Haters are all morons. Each and every last one of you. Evolution will be dead in ten years..mark your calanders. Today, Darwinism is in the same place in 2010 as communism was in 1986. It's wheezing like a dying animal. Flailing wildly. Draining limited resources defending itself against attackers. It's barely able to feed its own people, let alone advance useful scientific theories of its own.
@jehovasinz, O I see after looking a little harder at your name your not a jehovas wittness(their a cult) your a little better than them actually. They twist Gods Word. You are spiritually disabled! So sorry!
@jehovasis, are you a jehovas wittness? Just because you haven't been shown theese mysteries I've spent 30 years reading, praying, investigating and being taught by the Holy Spirit but even I have not reached anywhere near the tip of the ice berg. Why are you so angry with me to the point that you would be so high minded enough to declare me an idiot? I'm already well over half of my life expectancy and I can take the persecution until then. What angers you?
for those who believe on illogical theory that humans evolved in africa and start migrating magically through vast occeans, may be they had wings to fly over or swim like fishes.
check out evidence of homosapiens in other parts of world even before 200 thousands years ago, when this hypothetical migration took place.
Per the Bible we know a BIG lie is comming and that if possible even the elect of God will believe it.(of course those in chirist will descerne that is a lie but everyone else will accept this lie joyfully. Perhaps the scientific therories our government has made mandetory that all public schools teach theese therories as scientific fact is the beginning of the big lie.
@goodarkjedi, perhaps they don't want the Bible to be proven true because that would destroy all of there stupid theories and would make them look like baffoons. Every evolution believer jumps hard, quick and hatefully at anyone who just mentions they believe there's a God. WHY? they know about theese artifacts but because the can't be put into there therories they quickly box them up and send 'em to the warehouse.
@gooddarkjedi, the glass like substance forever preserved the fosils. Really? Can't you see theese fosils look frozen in time, not incaptured over million of years. It couldn't have even occured in 1 hour. The remenents of the ark HAVE BEEN FOUND but for some reason (probably pride)most archeologist want to be the first find this Hugh artifact or like the 1000's of archyological finding that give a true history of the Bible stored away in a Hugh ware house. This is a fact! (cont)
@jhartist123 Are you mentally chanllanged? You are spewing ambiguous claims because you are thinking with your emotions. They never said that man swam from africa to america but, an idiot like you expects to learn everything from a ten minute clip. That is why you love the bible simple people like you can't think critically on their own.
@gooddarkjedi, has anyone had a conversation with the picking the bugs out of her nappy head 1st female of humanity? Do you really trust the pridefull, desireing to be the first one to discover the correct theory first by any means possible? Carbon dateing is a misleading process. There was a world wide flood and it wasn't just a flood the whole earth cracked open plants and insects were instantly stuck inside the molting substance ^
last common female ancestor of all modern humans lived about 30000 years ago. the last common male ancesor of all modern humans lived about 12000 years ago. not the only ancestor, but the last common ancestor.
Maybe it's because they too, like the government and aliens(demons) have a hidden agenda. Afterall if you investigate carefully wars, acts of terrorism(911) how is it possible for anyone to be starveing in this world, why we can't find 1 man useing millions of soldiers and intelegence who know where to look, and many other events. You'll come a lot closer to finding the answers of human evolution than what's in a science book.
Evolution, while haveing some bases of trueth in exactly how life begins and devolopes not only ignores God, it ignores a force haveing started all processes. That is a complete lack of common sense or a hidden lie. We don't have the capacity in our brains to compute a noncreating force is capable of bringing about life as we no it. IT'S INSANE! Why do they absolutely hate those who ain't buying their bull?
@maxphilly, playing games with the human race. They cant be killed. Dureing the flood they simply left the bodies they made. They are spiritual beings. Everyone who doesn't hold to the trueth in Gods word will bite, hook, line and sinker the big lie that seems to be a fake alien invasion. We are in the end days and it is like the days of Noah were. BEWARE! Fallen angels have taught humans technology. They themselves can transform into a UFO.
@maxphilly, those little big black eyed grey looking beings we see on tv and Internet are 1 of 3 things, short people in costumes, Photoshop images or demons doing what they've always done, they can transform into anything. If you read my comments, the fallen angels(demons)made physical bodies to possess. They corrupted the han race and they started doing it again after. Those are the ones God told the isrealites to kill. But they didn't. So now they are once again(con)
What will we evolve into? Taking in consideration that we live in cities with tecnologies how will our bodies and minds evolve in 100 thousand years from now, maby aliensare not from outer space they might be from a diferent time!
So they took human and sometime animal DNA and made themselves male bodies(angels are also genderless)there offsping became "MEN OF RENOUNED, MEN OF OLD) does tis bring anyone to mind? Herculees? Zeus?Nephilim? The Giants? My brain is frozen but you can carry on. I'll bet most if not all mythological beings are tales of the fallen angels offspring. Ever flesh except Noah an his family was affected by theese beast.
The tower of babel is another interesting clue about the Pyramids and ancient archyology. The descendent of Noah were taught high tech trades from there fathers(Noahs 3 sons) and Noah. Theese high tech undertakeings was taught to the preflood people by the fallen angels. Also the sons of God(angels) mated with the daughters of man because they found them beautifull and irresistable. However angels have no physical bobies.(c)
As you can see everything I believe is proven in Gosd Word and some writtings band from the cannon but good for reasurch if you have enough descernment to know trueth from false. I will skip ahead and ask 1 question. Where was the tower of babel being built? That was where God scattered the nations by giveing them different languages. So there would be many first settlements scattered from Babylon.
It'd take entire books to explain each verse. all Scrpiture is to be studied by (1) a genuine heart felt desire (2) a relationship with Jesus Christ(3) a thirst for wisdom(4) for your own edification or to theach others if your are asked to do so.(5) to disprove falsehoods(6) to know trueth from lies....after you a have been taught by the Holy Spirit the mysteries all scientific therories are rediculously funny. It like learning urine is shades of yellow.
And a light to rule at night(moon)He also made the stars(it doesn't say when)(6)God made all the sea creatures after there kind and all the land animals after there kind. He formed man from the clay of the ground and breathed life ino his nostrils.(kinda sounds like CPR huh)all manner of fruit, vegetables and plants.(in 6 days) on the 7th day he rested. Now there's a lot of things that happened after that with mankind and the fallen angels but (continued)
I want to try and compare what the bible says with the idea of this video. Please don't be rude to me.I am merely stateing the facts.(1) in the beginning God created the HEAVENS and earth.(PERIOD)there's an unnumbered gap of time between this and(2) the earth was without form and darkness was upon the face of the deep.(3)The Holy Spirit moved upon the face of the waters(brooded like a hen on her eggs)(4)God made a great light to rule over the day(sun) (continued)
@pucheez, Thanks for responding to my comment. I saw were you commented to many others but I didn't read them because they weren't aimed at me. I don't know if the origin of our race has always been desputed(at least not on this scale) but it's so easily intregeing I am a dreamer by nature but my mind is always searching for answers. Noone has ALL the answers so I just take the ones we know to be fact and guess from there. O coarse I pray for answers. IT'S FUN
@jhartist123 we should use tools of rationality, logics and reasoning to get results,these are unqiue abilities we humans have, none of other species on earth possess those. i find it more logical to accept theory that all humans were evolved everywhere on earth, like other species, if not true about lions or dinos or any other species, that they evolved on certian part of earth then spread on earth, then why humans??
its more logical to accept that humans were evolved at same time everywhere
I don't think the Neanderthals completely died out. I think some of them had managed to intermarry into the Cro-Magnons and survive. Call me crazy, but isn't possible that humans of today might be related to both?
this is non logical theory, as what made early man to cross wide occeans? its against human psychology what make them sure there will be some land away from thier home land. this is all rubbish.
if humans evolve in africa, then why didnt they evolved at same time in all parts of world? instead of trying to prove that they cross wide occeans and then move to other parts, i find it totally against logics.
@woleez: The only crossing mentioned in the vid is crossing the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, which today is only about 12 miles across. Exploration may be against your human psychology, but I rather doubt you're right about us in general.
Species don't generally live all across the word, and only speciate in a locality. Whales lived in the Indus Valley in Pakistan until the Basilosaurus managed to invade salt water and became established worldwide. Mankind evolved in Africa is evidenced by genetics.
when anyone say mankind evolved in africa then spread in world magically by crossing thousands of kms of occesans without even knowing it, where they going, if find it most propitious. if by humans you means homosapiens, that what about early species of humans?? why they didnt crossed over vast seas blindly??
earliest species of humans fossilized discovered are as old as near 5-6 million years.
@woleez: Sorry, but that is pretty much incomprehensible. Who says anything about thousands of kms of ocean? Didn't you even read what I wrote? There were early migrations of monkeys, Oranutans, and early humans (H habilis and H erectus) out of Africa before H sapiens followed. Again, no one crossed vast seas blindly until very recently (Indonesian & Polynesian migrations).
Other than that, let's see your evidence about "shattering ideas"; that probably is shit.
@puncheex its illogical theory, when i said thousands of miles of occean, i mean how they crossed from africa to north america and even antartica? theory suggests that migration took place 200 thousands years ago. just give me one working and logical concept how they done it. or they had wings to fly over occeans???
i know about genetic markers but it dont make sense, even 200 thousands years ago there was thousands of miles of occeans seperating africa and north america.
@woleez: They crossed from Africa to Iraq, across to central Asia, then across Siberia to Alaska, and south into the Americas. During the ice age that ended just 20,000 years ago, the water locked into glaciers allowed the sea to run 60 meters lower than today; that would have exposed the land around the Beringian Strait ('tween Alaska and Siberia) and made a land bridge across. As for Antarctica, I don't think man made it to there before the 19th century. Look up Beringia, human migration.
@puncheex only question i have is, we humans dont do anything without purpose, as we talking about great migration of modern humans about 20,000 years ago, so they would have same logics and reasoning we have. what make them to suddenly leave thier homelands and quest for unknown lands?????????????
what was wrong in africa??? that force them to commit a suicide migration??? you cant say they were starving to death, as people who left ( as per your theory) stil alive in africa and popoulated it.
@woleez: Perhaps. Starvation could have done it; perhaps the six to ten years of winter following the Toba eruption in the middle of an ice age in the north, 70,000 ya. Central Africa which they inhabited is in the southern trade wind belt, and the ash from Toba would have ridden right over them. Moving as far as another belt (say, the Northern Trades across the equator, or south to the westerlies) could have taken care of the immediate problem. After that, population pressure. Works for me.
@puncheex NO, it cant be population pressure as as that time natural resources were abundent, and humans considered to be endangered species as far as number game was concerned.
if some natural calamity force them to leave thier homeland, then they should get settled in new land, what make them to leave and start circulating around the earth???
i dont buy it... as your arguments are based on assumptions not on logics and human psychology. hope this helps.
@woleez: I'd like to ask how the hell do you know what Central Africa was like in the years following the Toba explosion? Population pressure is amenable to a lot more than just food; we're talking the edge of the Sahara desert, the Sahel, during an ice age which generally means harsh weather elsewhere, as ocean water gets locked up in ice. Why did the Americam Indians travel from Alaska to Tierra del Fuego in 5,000 years? What is your alternative? That they just popped up wherever?
@puncheex HERE we go... Do you know all these things for sure??answer is NO,My alternate theory is more logical,It could be possible humans evolved simultaneously on different parts of world. Thats why we are so different in appearances,cultures,languages etc. Logically if humans really migrated from africa just 20-40 thousand years ago,there is NOT ENOUGH SUFFICENT TIME FOR EVOLUTION for different languages,cultures and appearances.THINK. Dont get fooled by fewer who fool most people of world.
@woleez: There is a name for that theory; it's called the multiregional hypothesis. The worst problem with it from your point of view is that it depends on more or less continuous travel between the various centers of evolution by individuals or small groups. Without that, the H sapiens in the centers would diverge into other species. The Chinese are the main believers today, as they're loathe to believe they didn't arise in the motherland. One should really study one's beliefs, don't you agree?
... I don't really have to point out that Central Africa would have certainly been recolonized from north and south after the eruption's effects had subsided, do I?
"You can't say they were starving..." Oh, you of little faith. Just think a minute. Say 20,000 miles from Africa to Siberia; 50,000 years. Less than a kilometer per year of movement; ten miles per generation. What say you; have you ever walked that far in a day, just to see what is on the other side?
@woleez they moved out of need as we still migrate to these days, people move from country to country in look for a better life and yet others stay back, back then some moved following game as they migrated elsewhere do to climate change and things like that, now days we move depending on the economy, different issues same humans so we deal with then basically the same way.
We as humans can be as disgusting as it can get but we can be as great as it can be. We dont need a god for all that.
The “Out of Africa” myth is a theory put forth not by actual scientists but by left-wing liberal arts professors. The theory is not based on any scientific evidence, but on social and political dogma. Often, the science departments at liberal Universities are bullied into accepting such hogwash by leftist University heads.
Different areas. Africans evolved in Africa. Europeans, Asians and Native Americans probabaly evolved somewhere else - also, note that the last 3 are genetically closely related why Africans are like some sort of isolated outcast (genetically).
Europeans, Asians and Native Americans probabaly have a common ancestor.... like... the Neanderthal?
@MiracleKD18 we share the same common ancestor as neanderthal. neanderthal was a different homonid species. like for example chimps and gorillas. they are both primates, but different species.
@MiracleKD18 your source is a news report.... watch "Neanderthal vs Cro Magnon" part 7 and 8 here on youtube. all humans today are originally from africa. there has probably been some interbreeding between early europeans and neanderthals, but there is actually no evidence that we have neanderthal genes as far as I know.
There was one lady alive, Somehow was born.. (What Came First? The Egg or the Chicken?) Hardest Question to Answer. Ever.. So basically this isnt proven. And its BS that someone actually thought we came from 1 race.. Then Became white.. (Some) Then Enslaved our ancestors for hundreds of years.. Seems Really Twisted, and maybe we shouldnt know were we came from.. But were we are Going.
1) Ramayana teaches humans descended from monkeys (though it also says there were bears somewhere in the cycle)
2) Bhagavad Gita speaks of Atomic weapons and there is radioactivity where the war of Mahabharat was fought. Deseases are damn common there due to poisoning.(close to Jodhpur in Rajasthan)
3) Krishna speaks about the Dual world, which we are rediscovering now about anti-matter, etc...
Wow, humans did nothing for millions of years then all of the sudden man figured it all out and within the course of 150 peauny years have advanced to the point that we can clone human beings. Any ony else find that odd?
@jhartist123: That's a pretty harsh critique. I'd say that man was essentially just another animal until 150,000 years ago, then started migrating and using intelligence to mold his environment for the next 140,000 years, and started using large civilizations in the last 10,000 years.
Not by a long shot. We can interbreed with them, so they aren't different species.
They are just a different race.
However, every non-African (white, asian, native american) has Neanderthal genes.
It is still debated whetever Neantherthrals were a different speies (Homo Neanderthalis) or a sub-species of Homo Sapiens (Homo Sapiens Neanderthalis).
@MiracleKD18 They can't be a subspecies of us because then, black people would have neanderthal genes too. They were probably just a different species adapted to a different environment.
The Out of Africa theory is afrocentric bullshit. Afrocentricism is not only ahistoric but also ascientific. Genetic testnig proven that Europeans and Asians are NOT out of Africa.
@MiracleKD18 are you kidding? genetic testing is the exact reason why we know that Europeans and Asians are descendants of early migratory Africans. search "Journey of Man" by Spencer Wells; it is cleary explained and backed up with scientific evidence.
@MiracleKD18 Mitochondrial DNA definitively proves that all of humanity is related, and that African haploid groups are the oldest. The controversy around the Recent African Origin theory is the Recent part. Some people think that many humans split from the African group earlier. So far though, the RAO theory is the most widely accepted.
Actually, I doubt that it's that recent. Off course, I an't deny that we have a common ancestor. Human-like apes left Africa very early (in my theory), and evolved into humans independently from each other. That's why different races exsist: they evolved ndependently, and later interbred, which created smaller races, such as Turanid (Europid+Mongoloid mix) and Etiopid (Europid+Negroid mix).
@MiracleKD18 Well that definitely didn't happen. There's no evidence for that. People are much much too alike for that to be true. But there may have early Homo sapiens groups who left Africa, later absorbed into the main group when haploid group M left. After all, some Neanderthal DNA markers have been discovered in modern humans.
There's no genetic bases for functionally different "races". That's an idea adopted by Europeans in the 16th century to justify colonizing the New World.
@MiracleKD18: Sorry. There appears to be voluminous evidence for it. It could have still been doubted before genomic research became available, but that has pretty much put the kibosh on the distributed theory. Our ancestors came from Africa; get over it.
The “Out of Africa” myth is a theory put forth not by actual scientists but by left-wing liberal arts professors. The theory is not based on any scientific evidence, but on social and political dogma. Often, the science departments at liberal Universities are bullied into accepting such hogwash by leftist University heads.
@MiracleKD18: I don't concur on that. While the multiregional hypothesis may have been considered supported by some data as late as the 70s, the amount of genomic data collected since then has generally promoted the Out of Africa theory to the point that few academics or members of the scientific community have doubts about it, excepting certain nationalistic groups who desire to have originated in their countries, such as China.
What about the civilization they just discovered in south Africa.they carbon dated the site that dated to 200,000 years ago .we dont know shit about are species or what interaction previous versions of what we call human had with each other.
lowgeemudbone 1 week ago
Before the big bang
petelittle 2 weeks ago
wow thats amazing
YaMumLuvsMe 1 month ago
@bigman05100 it was reinacted dumbass
YaMumLuvsMe 1 month ago
@bigman05100 It wasn't.
anticorncob6 1 month ago
so does this mean when someone asks what my ethnicity is i can say "technically i'm african american?!?" even though i'm white. lmao, i mean if it's proven then why not?
supersneakysquirrel 2 months ago
@supersneakysquirrel You are not white, you are human.
killajakethesnake 1 month ago
I Dnt know bout the whole no time no space an no matter thing literally no one alive ever ever evvveerr will know that.. Same goes with the initial creation of earth, there's no hard evidence .. of either
123Jakeism 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This video is racist. I'm reporting it to the ACLU.
knowwaie 3 months ago
Not accurate at all.. One group left from North Africa into Europe...
MJFAN666 3 months ago
1:12 hahaha prehistoric shorts !!
IvanderHaisley 4 months ago
00:03 so there were other humans who left Africa and actually evolved before the "main" (us) group left? And they all died of climate change?
BubbaGump332 4 months ago
australia was connected to new guinea when the aboriginies crossed
devilpizza123 4 months ago
Based on mtDNA evidence (Krings et al) humans did not evolve from chimps, neanderthals, gorillas or orangutans. There is no mtDNA extracted from an ape like common ancestor. An ape like common ancestor is just a speculation based on rate of mtDNA mutations which is not fully understood yet.
daogdaog 4 months ago
I love these videos. potholer54 videos are excellent, too.
ndrthrdr1 4 months ago
still have a hard time with the before the big bang there was not time or space idea, then what was there before the big bang, cause and effect and all, not that we can ever really know if there was anything before the big bang because everything that could have been there was probably annihilated in the process. i'll just quote the professor "The last protons should be decaying right now. and here we are the end of the universe......... (wow) unbelievable its a second big bang!"
lopendepaddo 4 months ago in playlist universe
like they would know that yemen and australia were there. that bullshit
chrishillification 5 months ago
@chrishillification They could SEE Yemen. It's a long distance for primitive people to cross, but they could see it. I don't know much about the Australia crossing, but the were fleeing the destruction from a large eruption, they obviously made it there, and it's the scientific consensus.
GnarlyNewEngland 4 months ago
@chrishillification are you under the impression that primitive man was blind. Yemen was only a 10 mile crossing so they could obviously see it and australia was 100 miles away. surely with nothing obstructing there view they would be able to make out a land mass there too. just let go of your dogmas and think a little bit.
kris6682 4 months ago
@kris6682 I live by the great lakes. I cant see across lake Erie surley the width of lake Erie is not 100 miles. I have been to lake Champlain. I cant see across it in most areas. And both of these are less than 100 miles and 10 miles
chrishillification 4 months ago
@chrishillification it has to do with perspective if you are higher up you can see farther. the fact that you think you couldnt see a distance such as ten mile is wrong. you would only need to be about 65 feet above sea level and the coasts of africa are littered with mountains.to see a distance of 100 miles you would need to be around 6500 feet above sea level. are you saying that there are no mountains in africa. btw lake champlain is 12 miles wide your just not high enough to see across it
kris6682 4 months ago
How different earth could have been if Africa wasn't attached to Eurasia
Orlando2914 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
the damn french arent goin to steal the basques glory...the solutreans werent french but basques(the dna proves it)..if they found skulls in southern france its because the basques also settled in france...
TheBasqueLand 6 months ago
what did you call Dimitri Mendeleev? Dimitri Mendeleviaa? WTH
pooppeeyoupants 6 months ago
Science, on the other hand, focuses on repeated tests to prove certain theories wrong or incomplete.. It describes patterns of nature which do not change, and is backed with mountains of evidences.. Our real origin, as far as we know, dates back to billions of years and we have no physical access to these realms, thus, it is incredibly difficult to explain such complex processes with so little evidence.. Nevertheless, we are constantly gathering new evidences and rewriting our story of creation
remoraid7 6 months ago
Religion, is only as old as the first human who devised it based on radical ideas that were backed with absolutely no empirical evidence.. They often employ the use of an imaginary divine to back their claims.. And because as much as it cannot be proved, it also cannot be disprove, thereby compelling many to belief in it.. Over many time-tested failures in disproving the ideas, it became established fact..
remoraid7 6 months ago
When dealing with such extremely long time periods that dates so far back into the past and trying to probe realms of nature that we have absolutely no access to, our only hope is to study the remnants or evidences of these realms and by using the scientific method, explore what the evidences tell us about nature.. Religion, on the other hand, is based on ideology passed down for generations..
remoraid7 6 months ago
Hehe if you were paying attention.. Evolution takes place over a period of millions of years.. And it seems that earth is old enough to allow for life to evolve to what it is today.. Our history of biodiversity and human history dates back only to a few thousands of years.. What makes you think that there would be a significant change in species, much less any observable evolution to happen within such a short period of time?..
remoraid7 6 months ago
wow!
aksheyify 7 months ago
Uhhh, it's definitely not true that only the early humans that remained in Africa survived.
McTaggStar 7 months ago in playlist Physical Anthropology
@McTaggStar what makes you think that?
thegreig 7 months ago
@thegreig: Among other things, the fact that recent molecular studies found that all extant humans who are non-African are carrying some H. neanderthalensis genes. H. sapiens and H. neaderthalensis interbread, and H. neaderthalensis lived in Europe and Eurasia. If all humans outside Africa had died out, it wouldn't be the case today that non-Africans carry neanderthal genes.
McTaggStar 7 months ago
@McTaggStar Ok, this subject is new to me so i was just curious. thanks.
thegreig 7 months ago
@thegreig: On that note then, a word of warning: whatever you see on YouTube regarding subjects like paleontology, archaeology, evolutionary biology, physical anthropology, etc, take with a grain of salt. There are active research programs in all of these areas, and new information is being discovered all the time. This video is very outdated. Your best place to get cool, up to date info is Scientific American online, and published text books in the bio/earth sciences.
McTaggStar 7 months ago
@thegreig: As well as National Geographic.
McTaggStar 7 months ago
@McTaggStar : That made no sense to me either.
auggiedoggy 7 months ago
The story of evolution and how life began is so beautiful.
Juillardl 7 months ago
1:27 did that guy fucked himself to get decendants ??
sarmido 7 months ago
Comment removed
akkadianarab 8 months ago
My theory on what modern humanity calls drawings on cave walls (IE) Art or paintings is. That the drawings on the walls of the cave of our distant ancestors were not put there to be viewed as Art. But to be used as instructional symbols to TEACH hunting skills. Elaboration: If you look at how each symbol is used, and follow the example being shown in the drawings, those same examples can be used today to have successful hunts using the same type weapons. We may be viewing the 1st class rooms.
commonman80 8 months ago
Every second a dumbass is born...
ilikenewbies457 8 months ago
daogdaog There is overwhelming evidence of gradual evolution you need to read any good science book to understand that. You misunderstand the word species. You think each individual in a species is the same. They are not. Each has its own unique DNA and variation. It is only when a group emerges with an incompatible set of genes with others of its original genome that a new species occurs. The correct way to think of it is as a continuum of genetic mutation.
bingofingers 8 months ago
Don't want to be a pedant but it is more likely that initially wolves selected themselves for domestication. The least cautious wolves probably foraged for scraps of food in human camps and were tolerated for reasons we don't know. Over a long period of time these evolved traits of domesticity that allowed man to tame them. Its not the case that modern wolves were domesticated rather an ancestor that had co-evolved with humans.
bingofingers 8 months ago
If evolution is correct why are species distinct from each other with no evidence that they gradually evolved to the next species. Ever since apes are still apes, crocs are still crocs. Neandertals never interacted with modern man. Mutations are actually defects. If you have 11 fingers, it is a genetic defect. Dont expect other people will soon have 11 fingers too. If you cross breed horse and donkey you will get a sterile mule.
daogdaog 8 months ago
Generally this video is pretty good though! I dont mean to be picky :)
babssharman 8 months ago in playlist Evolution
Okay- now I'm not a lecturer on this supject but I did study this last year at uni. This video isnt absolutely correct. A couple of points:
1. Waves of populations left africa. It wasnt a single group.
2. There are many different species of 'Modern humans'. One species- i think the species they mean here, left africa and moved along the coast towards malaysia, where there was another sp of modern human from a previous wave. The lack of meat changing stature should be taken with a pinch of salt.
babssharman 8 months ago in playlist Evolution
Lies, lies, all of it.
Do I look like a black man to you?
Do I behave like a black man?
The answer is TOTALLY NO!!!!!!!!!!!
We are the decsendants of the most superior man on earth - Charles Darwin
Now this is the logical truth
Bigdude1888 8 months ago
@Bigdude1888 Maybe we don't descend from modern black people, but possibly a more primitive species of humans that we all split from, probably resembled black people more than it did other races, since we DO originate from Africa.
Tazy50 7 months ago
I so agree with simpsonmark, This is very well done . So is Genesis 2.0. This film maker makes me proud to be a human.
iceblude 9 months ago
well done. I enjoyed this.
simpsonmark 9 months ago
@ 6:28 seconds, did he say our "ancestors had Chuck Norris"? I keep rewinding it and that's what it sounds like he's saying.
PulpPractical 9 months ago
@PulpPractical yes, chuck norris is the reason we survived, now you know the truth.
viicISrotcib 9 months ago
it really is beautiful when u think about all of it :D
cabot2jville2010 10 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
In The Name of God (Allah)The Most Gracious The Most Merciful
76:(1) Has there not been over Man a long period of Time, when he was nothing - (not even) mentioned?
(2) Verily We created Man from a drop of mingled sperm, in order to try him: So We gave him (the gifts), of Hearing and Sight.
(3) We showed him the Way: whether he be grateful or ungrateful (rests on his will)."
77705000000000000000 10 months ago
people must have been fat when they got there if they hate there way there.
rgrggfdgfgr 10 months ago
why are they playing african music lol
linkintek06 11 months ago
@linkintek06 they evolved from africa WE ARE ALL FROM AFRICA to be honest
JEFF12ALAS 9 months ago in playlist Physical Anthropology
more holes in this story than a wheel of cheese
chopin999 11 months ago
@chopin999 Maybe a solid block wheel:)
buktomsin 11 months ago
Sheer fantasy. There is no way we all came from a single mother in Africa. Besides everybody knows the Flying Spaghetti Monster created everybody & everything.
dirtydonki 11 months ago
omg .....status quo crap
sLONEstRanger 11 months ago
Claptrap! LOL
ZeldasDiner 1 year ago
Illuminati
illumacedon 1 year ago
Before that explosion there was NO TIME..NOTHING.. Give me a break there is no such thing as "nothing" that explosion and if there ever was one..happened because of something..u dont just get an explosion out of nothing..
EuropeanGuy87 1 year ago
@EuropeanGuy87 Big bang wasn't an explosion. It was an inflation. Please, listen what Physicists say and you might be surprised. The theories aren't pulled from ass.
muromestari 11 months ago 6
@EuropeanGuy87 correct there was only electrons, all in place but thanks to about 5 electrons randomly being out of place it made the universe
TechWings 11 months ago
Europeans are definitely the latest evolution on the human tree..and the most sophisticated ...we accomplished the most things..while those aboriginal people were wild and had no idea we even existed..before we discover them..
EuropeanGuy87 1 year ago
2029- human brain is reverse engineered and AI achieves the same computations per second as the human brain. 2045-Human biology fully fused with technology.
shmalignant 1 year ago
Why do you have the first human as being black, I thought that thinking was changed. Also, I understand that the thinking of the extinction event of 65myo was not primarily the space rock, but that the space rock was the KO punch of an already failing system.
christo930 1 year ago
asshoes we came for god you may not belive it but it's true ya'll sitting up there making shit up. how and why did all this happen. we did not evolve, so ya'll think that on day monkeys just stood up lost all our fur then grow hair the develoed a differnt body mass languages looks and all that.
manman4092 1 year ago
@manman4092 Domestic dogs were all selectively bred by humans from wolves. People that wanted small, cute wolves would take the smallest of the litters, then breed them with other small wolves, then take the smallest, cutest of that litter and repeat the process. Over time, they get smaller and cuter until like a 1000 years later you get a poodle. That's how evolution works. It's the small changes between parents and their kids. It took monkeys MILLIONS of years to become human.
Slanguaj 1 year ago 33
@Slanguaj Apes*
buktomsin 11 months ago
@buktomsin human*
Slanguaj 11 months ago
@Slanguaj I like that you defend evolution, but I have a few problems with your statement. Evolution doesn't work by selective breeding. The main mechanism that drives evolution is natural selection along with other mechanisms for evolutionary change. Also, monkeys didn't "become human." We didn't evolve from monkeys or apes, but rather we share a common ancestor with them.
Xsublime28xX 9 months ago
@Xsublime28xX You're being needlessly picky. Natural selection determines which animals will breed. I didn't say that humans selectively bred everything. If you trace our ancestry back far enough you will find an animal that by all modern definitions would be referred to as a monkey. Yes it wasn't a modern species of monkey, but it was a monkey.
Slanguaj 9 months ago
@Slanguaj I'm not being picky. You gave an example of selective breeding and then you said "thats how evolution works". Well you're wrong, it doesn't work that way. If you can't explain evolution correctly, then don't do it.
Xsublime28xX 9 months ago
@Slanguaj Look I don't want to get into a heated stupid debate. I'm being overly critical and I apologize ok.
Xsublime28xX 9 months ago
@Xsublime28xX Apology accepted. I agree that I over simplified, but if you read the comment I was replying to (which says something like: monkeys one day became people) you might see that it was neccessary in that context. What I was attempting to describe was the way in which changes accumalate over many generations, and not so much why those changes take place.
Slanguaj 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Slanguaj LOL! You God-Haters are all morons. Each and every last one of you. Evolution will be dead in ten years..mark your calanders. Today, Darwinism is in the same place in 2010 as communism was in 1986. It's wheezing like a dying animal. Flailing wildly. Draining limited resources defending itself against attackers. It's barely able to feed its own people, let alone advance useful scientific theories of its own.
afar1 8 months ago
@jehovasinz, O I see after looking a little harder at your name your not a jehovas wittness(their a cult) your a little better than them actually. They twist Gods Word. You are spiritually disabled! So sorry!
jhartist123 1 year ago
@jehovasis, are you a jehovas wittness? Just because you haven't been shown theese mysteries I've spent 30 years reading, praying, investigating and being taught by the Holy Spirit but even I have not reached anywhere near the tip of the ice berg. Why are you so angry with me to the point that you would be so high minded enough to declare me an idiot? I'm already well over half of my life expectancy and I can take the persecution until then. What angers you?
jhartist123 1 year ago
for those who believe on illogical theory that humans evolved in africa and start migrating magically through vast occeans, may be they had wings to fly over or swim like fishes.
check out evidence of homosapiens in other parts of world even before 200 thousands years ago, when this hypothetical migration took place.
youtube.com/watch?v=so1T8n9VLYA
youtube.com/watch?v=KSacfco_C6I
youtube.com/watch?v=JrajJ2xVkbs
stop living in dreamland.
woleez 1 year ago
Per the Bible we know a BIG lie is comming and that if possible even the elect of God will believe it.(of course those in chirist will descerne that is a lie but everyone else will accept this lie joyfully. Perhaps the scientific therories our government has made mandetory that all public schools teach theese therories as scientific fact is the beginning of the big lie.
jhartist123 1 year ago
@goodarkjedi, perhaps they don't want the Bible to be proven true because that would destroy all of there stupid theories and would make them look like baffoons. Every evolution believer jumps hard, quick and hatefully at anyone who just mentions they believe there's a God. WHY? they know about theese artifacts but because the can't be put into there therories they quickly box them up and send 'em to the warehouse.
jhartist123 1 year ago
@gooddarkjedi, the glass like substance forever preserved the fosils. Really? Can't you see theese fosils look frozen in time, not incaptured over million of years. It couldn't have even occured in 1 hour. The remenents of the ark HAVE BEEN FOUND but for some reason (probably pride)most archeologist want to be the first find this Hugh artifact or like the 1000's of archyological finding that give a true history of the Bible stored away in a Hugh ware house. This is a fact! (cont)
jhartist123 1 year ago
@jhartist123 Are you mentally chanllanged? You are spewing ambiguous claims because you are thinking with your emotions. They never said that man swam from africa to america but, an idiot like you expects to learn everything from a ten minute clip. That is why you love the bible simple people like you can't think critically on their own.
jehovasinz 1 year ago
@gooddarkjedi, has anyone had a conversation with the picking the bugs out of her nappy head 1st female of humanity? Do you really trust the pridefull, desireing to be the first one to discover the correct theory first by any means possible? Carbon dateing is a misleading process. There was a world wide flood and it wasn't just a flood the whole earth cracked open plants and insects were instantly stuck inside the molting substance ^
jhartist123 1 year ago
last common female ancestor of all modern humans lived about 30000 years ago. the last common male ancesor of all modern humans lived about 12000 years ago. not the only ancestor, but the last common ancestor.
gooddarkjedi 1 year ago
all the creed you need ;) :D
JediDave44 1 year ago
Maybe it's because they too, like the government and aliens(demons) have a hidden agenda. Afterall if you investigate carefully wars, acts of terrorism(911) how is it possible for anyone to be starveing in this world, why we can't find 1 man useing millions of soldiers and intelegence who know where to look, and many other events. You'll come a lot closer to finding the answers of human evolution than what's in a science book.
jhartist123 1 year ago
Evolution, while haveing some bases of trueth in exactly how life begins and devolopes not only ignores God, it ignores a force haveing started all processes. That is a complete lack of common sense or a hidden lie. We don't have the capacity in our brains to compute a noncreating force is capable of bringing about life as we no it. IT'S INSANE! Why do they absolutely hate those who ain't buying their bull?
jhartist123 1 year ago
@maxphilly, playing games with the human race. They cant be killed. Dureing the flood they simply left the bodies they made. They are spiritual beings. Everyone who doesn't hold to the trueth in Gods word will bite, hook, line and sinker the big lie that seems to be a fake alien invasion. We are in the end days and it is like the days of Noah were. BEWARE! Fallen angels have taught humans technology. They themselves can transform into a UFO.
jhartist123 1 year ago
@maxphilly, those little big black eyed grey looking beings we see on tv and Internet are 1 of 3 things, short people in costumes, Photoshop images or demons doing what they've always done, they can transform into anything. If you read my comments, the fallen angels(demons)made physical bodies to possess. They corrupted the han race and they started doing it again after. Those are the ones God told the isrealites to kill. But they didn't. So now they are once again(con)
jhartist123 1 year ago
What will we evolve into? Taking in consideration that we live in cities with tecnologies how will our bodies and minds evolve in 100 thousand years from now, maby aliensare not from outer space they might be from a diferent time!
maxphilly 1 year ago
@antidj00, Theres a smart ass born every minuet
jhartist123 1 year ago 10
So they took human and sometime animal DNA and made themselves male bodies(angels are also genderless)there offsping became "MEN OF RENOUNED, MEN OF OLD) does tis bring anyone to mind? Herculees? Zeus?Nephilim? The Giants? My brain is frozen but you can carry on. I'll bet most if not all mythological beings are tales of the fallen angels offspring. Ever flesh except Noah an his family was affected by theese beast.
jhartist123 1 year ago
The tower of babel is another interesting clue about the Pyramids and ancient archyology. The descendent of Noah were taught high tech trades from there fathers(Noahs 3 sons) and Noah. Theese high tech undertakeings was taught to the preflood people by the fallen angels. Also the sons of God(angels) mated with the daughters of man because they found them beautifull and irresistable. However angels have no physical bobies.(c)
jhartist123 1 year ago
As you can see everything I believe is proven in Gosd Word and some writtings band from the cannon but good for reasurch if you have enough descernment to know trueth from false. I will skip ahead and ask 1 question. Where was the tower of babel being built? That was where God scattered the nations by giveing them different languages. So there would be many first settlements scattered from Babylon.
jhartist123 1 year ago
@jhartist123 did you mean 'proven in Gods Word' ?
antidj00 1 year ago
It'd take entire books to explain each verse. all Scrpiture is to be studied by (1) a genuine heart felt desire (2) a relationship with Jesus Christ(3) a thirst for wisdom(4) for your own edification or to theach others if your are asked to do so.(5) to disprove falsehoods(6) to know trueth from lies....after you a have been taught by the Holy Spirit the mysteries all scientific therories are rediculously funny. It like learning urine is shades of yellow.
jhartist123 1 year ago
And a light to rule at night(moon)He also made the stars(it doesn't say when)(6)God made all the sea creatures after there kind and all the land animals after there kind. He formed man from the clay of the ground and breathed life ino his nostrils.(kinda sounds like CPR huh)all manner of fruit, vegetables and plants.(in 6 days) on the 7th day he rested. Now there's a lot of things that happened after that with mankind and the fallen angels but (continued)
jhartist123 1 year ago
I want to try and compare what the bible says with the idea of this video. Please don't be rude to me.I am merely stateing the facts.(1) in the beginning God created the HEAVENS and earth.(PERIOD)there's an unnumbered gap of time between this and(2) the earth was without form and darkness was upon the face of the deep.(3)The Holy Spirit moved upon the face of the waters(brooded like a hen on her eggs)(4)God made a great light to rule over the day(sun) (continued)
jhartist123 1 year ago
@pucheez, Thanks for responding to my comment. I saw were you commented to many others but I didn't read them because they weren't aimed at me. I don't know if the origin of our race has always been desputed(at least not on this scale) but it's so easily intregeing I am a dreamer by nature but my mind is always searching for answers. Noone has ALL the answers so I just take the ones we know to be fact and guess from there. O coarse I pray for answers. IT'S FUN
jhartist123 1 year ago
@jhartist123 we should use tools of rationality, logics and reasoning to get results,these are unqiue abilities we humans have, none of other species on earth possess those. i find it more logical to accept theory that all humans were evolved everywhere on earth, like other species, if not true about lions or dinos or any other species, that they evolved on certian part of earth then spread on earth, then why humans??
its more logical to accept that humans were evolved at same time everywhere
woleez 1 year ago
this is all illogical
woleez 1 year ago
@woleez: You keep saying that.
puncheex 1 year ago
I don't think the Neanderthals completely died out. I think some of them had managed to intermarry into the Cro-Magnons and survive. Call me crazy, but isn't possible that humans of today might be related to both?
shadowgirl9891 1 year ago
this is non logical theory, as what made early man to cross wide occeans? its against human psychology what make them sure there will be some land away from thier home land. this is all rubbish.
if humans evolve in africa, then why didnt they evolved at same time in all parts of world? instead of trying to prove that they cross wide occeans and then move to other parts, i find it totally against logics.
woleez 1 year ago
@woleez: The only crossing mentioned in the vid is crossing the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, which today is only about 12 miles across. Exploration may be against your human psychology, but I rather doubt you're right about us in general.
Species don't generally live all across the word, and only speciate in a locality. Whales lived in the Indus Valley in Pakistan until the Basilosaurus managed to invade salt water and became established worldwide. Mankind evolved in Africa is evidenced by genetics.
puncheex 1 year ago
when anyone say mankind evolved in africa then spread in world magically by crossing thousands of kms of occesans without even knowing it, where they going, if find it most propitious. if by humans you means homosapiens, that what about early species of humans?? why they didnt crossed over vast seas blindly??
earliest species of humans fossilized discovered are as old as near 5-6 million years.
youtube.com/watch?v=tJ_PbgHC0oI
it also shattering ideas about darwanism shit
woleez 1 year ago
@woleez: Sorry, but that is pretty much incomprehensible. Who says anything about thousands of kms of ocean? Didn't you even read what I wrote? There were early migrations of monkeys, Oranutans, and early humans (H habilis and H erectus) out of Africa before H sapiens followed. Again, no one crossed vast seas blindly until very recently (Indonesian & Polynesian migrations).
Other than that, let's see your evidence about "shattering ideas"; that probably is shit.
puncheex 1 year ago
@puncheex its illogical theory, when i said thousands of miles of occean, i mean how they crossed from africa to north america and even antartica? theory suggests that migration took place 200 thousands years ago. just give me one working and logical concept how they done it. or they had wings to fly over occeans???
i know about genetic markers but it dont make sense, even 200 thousands years ago there was thousands of miles of occeans seperating africa and north america.
woleez 1 year ago
@woleez: They crossed from Africa to Iraq, across to central Asia, then across Siberia to Alaska, and south into the Americas. During the ice age that ended just 20,000 years ago, the water locked into glaciers allowed the sea to run 60 meters lower than today; that would have exposed the land around the Beringian Strait ('tween Alaska and Siberia) and made a land bridge across. As for Antarctica, I don't think man made it to there before the 19th century. Look up Beringia, human migration.
puncheex 1 year ago
@puncheex only question i have is, we humans dont do anything without purpose, as we talking about great migration of modern humans about 20,000 years ago, so they would have same logics and reasoning we have. what make them to suddenly leave thier homelands and quest for unknown lands?????????????
what was wrong in africa??? that force them to commit a suicide migration??? you cant say they were starving to death, as people who left ( as per your theory) stil alive in africa and popoulated it.
woleez 1 year ago
@woleez: Perhaps. Starvation could have done it; perhaps the six to ten years of winter following the Toba eruption in the middle of an ice age in the north, 70,000 ya. Central Africa which they inhabited is in the southern trade wind belt, and the ash from Toba would have ridden right over them. Moving as far as another belt (say, the Northern Trades across the equator, or south to the westerlies) could have taken care of the immediate problem. After that, population pressure. Works for me.
puncheex 1 year ago
@puncheex NO, it cant be population pressure as as that time natural resources were abundent, and humans considered to be endangered species as far as number game was concerned.
if some natural calamity force them to leave thier homeland, then they should get settled in new land, what make them to leave and start circulating around the earth???
i dont buy it... as your arguments are based on assumptions not on logics and human psychology. hope this helps.
woleez 1 year ago
@woleez: I'd like to ask how the hell do you know what Central Africa was like in the years following the Toba explosion? Population pressure is amenable to a lot more than just food; we're talking the edge of the Sahara desert, the Sahel, during an ice age which generally means harsh weather elsewhere, as ocean water gets locked up in ice. Why did the Americam Indians travel from Alaska to Tierra del Fuego in 5,000 years? What is your alternative? That they just popped up wherever?
puncheex 1 year ago
@puncheex HERE we go... Do you know all these things for sure??answer is NO,My alternate theory is more logical,It could be possible humans evolved simultaneously on different parts of world. Thats why we are so different in appearances,cultures,languages etc. Logically if humans really migrated from africa just 20-40 thousand years ago,there is NOT ENOUGH SUFFICENT TIME FOR EVOLUTION for different languages,cultures and appearances.THINK. Dont get fooled by fewer who fool most people of world.
woleez 1 year ago
@woleez: There is a name for that theory; it's called the multiregional hypothesis. The worst problem with it from your point of view is that it depends on more or less continuous travel between the various centers of evolution by individuals or small groups. Without that, the H sapiens in the centers would diverge into other species. The Chinese are the main believers today, as they're loathe to believe they didn't arise in the motherland. One should really study one's beliefs, don't you agree?
puncheex 1 year ago
... I don't really have to point out that Central Africa would have certainly been recolonized from north and south after the eruption's effects had subsided, do I?
"You can't say they were starving..." Oh, you of little faith. Just think a minute. Say 20,000 miles from Africa to Siberia; 50,000 years. Less than a kilometer per year of movement; ten miles per generation. What say you; have you ever walked that far in a day, just to see what is on the other side?
(Final part of 2.)
puncheex 1 year ago
@woleez they moved out of need as we still migrate to these days, people move from country to country in look for a better life and yet others stay back, back then some moved following game as they migrated elsewhere do to climate change and things like that, now days we move depending on the economy, different issues same humans so we deal with then basically the same way.
We as humans can be as disgusting as it can get but we can be as great as it can be. We dont need a god for all that.
ohf27 1 year ago
The “Out of Africa” myth is a theory put forth not by actual scientists but by left-wing liberal arts professors. The theory is not based on any scientific evidence, but on social and political dogma. Often, the science departments at liberal Universities are bullied into accepting such hogwash by leftist University heads.
MiracleKD18 1 year ago
@MiracleKD18 Where do you think humans evolved from then?
123Atheist 1 year ago
@123Atheist
Different areas. Africans evolved in Africa. Europeans, Asians and Native Americans probabaly evolved somewhere else - also, note that the last 3 are genetically closely related why Africans are like some sort of isolated outcast (genetically).
Europeans, Asians and Native Americans probabaly have a common ancestor.... like... the Neanderthal?
MiracleKD18 1 year ago
@MiracleKD18 we share the same common ancestor as neanderthal. neanderthal was a different homonid species. like for example chimps and gorillas. they are both primates, but different species.
HeyPeni 1 year ago
@HeyPeni
Wrong.
All Non-Africans today have Neanderthal genes.
watch?v=LGhXuMpwo-o
MiracleKD18 1 year ago
@MiracleKD18 your source is a news report.... watch "Neanderthal vs Cro Magnon" part 7 and 8 here on youtube. all humans today are originally from africa. there has probably been some interbreeding between early europeans and neanderthals, but there is actually no evidence that we have neanderthal genes as far as I know.
HeyPeni 1 year ago
@HeyPeni
Actually. Compare the differenes of White/Asian vs Black and th edifferences of Neanderthal vs Modern Human.
Whites and Asians: more intelligent than blaks + higher physical strenght. Blacks: can ru nfaster and jump higher.
Neanderthal: was stronger, thougher than modern humans and had bigger brains, but was very slow and couldn't jump.
Compare the differences.
MiracleKD18 1 year ago
@HeyPeni: A Draft Sequnce of the Neandertal Genome, by Svante Paabo et al, Max Planck Institute. sciencemag(.)org/content/328/5979/710.full
Very interesting reading, and covers more than just the announcement of an initial Neandertal genome release.
puncheex 1 year ago
@puncheex yeah I just found out a few days ago. my bad.
HeyPeni 1 year ago
There was one lady alive, Somehow was born.. (What Came First? The Egg or the Chicken?) Hardest Question to Answer. Ever.. So basically this isnt proven. And its BS that someone actually thought we came from 1 race.. Then Became white.. (Some) Then Enslaved our ancestors for hundreds of years.. Seems Really Twisted, and maybe we shouldnt know were we came from.. But were we are Going.
XBxUxTxCxHxExRX 1 year ago
@XBxUxTxCxHxExRX Where was a guy during that time?
shadowgirl9891 1 year ago
what about other theorys about humam imigration, the ideia of this documentary is limited from USA ideals
SarahCota 1 year ago
@SarahCota: Like?
puncheex 1 year ago
very interesting
XxFsxloverxX 1 year ago
[dot ]ety [dot] com [slash] HRP [slash] race [slash] dna [dot] htm
There you go
MiracleKD18 1 year ago
Comment removed
Tazy50 1 year ago
1) Ramayana teaches humans descended from monkeys (though it also says there were bears somewhere in the cycle)
2) Bhagavad Gita speaks of Atomic weapons and there is radioactivity where the war of Mahabharat was fought. Deseases are damn common there due to poisoning.(close to Jodhpur in Rajasthan)
3) Krishna speaks about the Dual world, which we are rediscovering now about anti-matter, etc...
08arijit 1 year ago
Does anyone know the music that plays during the trek to the Americas? It's incredible.
Sharagran 1 year ago
Wow, humans did nothing for millions of years then all of the sudden man figured it all out and within the course of 150 peauny years have advanced to the point that we can clone human beings. Any ony else find that odd?
jhartist123 1 year ago
@jhartist123: That's a pretty harsh critique. I'd say that man was essentially just another animal until 150,000 years ago, then started migrating and using intelligence to mold his environment for the next 140,000 years, and started using large civilizations in the last 10,000 years.
puncheex 1 year ago
Afrocentric bullshit. We are NOT out of Africa.
White power!
MiracleKD18 1 year ago
@MiracleKD18 dumb shit, we all evolved in Africa.
gregrutz 1 year ago
@gregrutz
No we didn't. Arheologists found skulls in Georgia. Skulls of Modern Humans, and about 135 000 years ago.
MiracleKD18 1 year ago
@MiracleKD18 Humans evolved in Africa millions of years ago.
gregrutz 1 year ago
@MiracleKD18 Proof it or shut up
fourdimentionalhp 1 year ago
@MiracleKD18 I'm sorry, but racism doesn't change facts.
Tazy50 1 year ago
@Tazy50
Fats? LOL
Blacks are purely Africans.
However, there is proof that all non-Africans have Neanderthal genes. That changes everything.
MiracleKD18 1 year ago
@MiracleKD18 So, basically black people are *kind of* a different species from the rest of us? O.o
Tazy50 1 year ago
@Tazy50
Not by a long shot. We can interbreed with them, so they aren't different species.
They are just a different race.
However, every non-African (white, asian, native american) has Neanderthal genes.
It is still debated whetever Neantherthrals were a different speies (Homo Neanderthalis) or a sub-species of Homo Sapiens (Homo Sapiens Neanderthalis).
MiracleKD18 1 year ago
@MiracleKD18 They can't be a subspecies of us because then, black people would have neanderthal genes too. They were probably just a different species adapted to a different environment.
Tazy50 1 year ago
@Tazy50
Or maybe none of us really understand the meaning of the words "race" "species" "sub-speicies".
Neanderthals were a sub-species of Homo Sapiens. They were the Homo Sapiens Neanderthalis, every non-Afrian desended from them.
Every afrian descended from the Homo Sapiens Africanis, the archaic africans.
MiracleKD18 1 year ago
@MiracleKD18
And every non-african descended from the homo sapiens africanis.
I'm sorry, but do you try to deny the common ancestry of us and africans?
mardastheEitheist 1 year ago
@mardastheEitheist
Yes I do.
The Out of Africa theory is afrocentric bullshit. Afrocentricism is not only ahistoric but also ascientific. Genetic testnig proven that Europeans and Asians are NOT out of Africa.
MiracleKD18 1 year ago
@MiracleKD18 are you kidding? genetic testing is the exact reason why we know that Europeans and Asians are descendants of early migratory Africans. search "Journey of Man" by Spencer Wells; it is cleary explained and backed up with scientific evidence.
mdrndrum 1 year ago
@MiracleKD18 Mitochondrial DNA definitively proves that all of humanity is related, and that African haploid groups are the oldest. The controversy around the Recent African Origin theory is the Recent part. Some people think that many humans split from the African group earlier. So far though, the RAO theory is the most widely accepted.
TacticusPrime 1 year ago
@TacticusPrime
Actually, I doubt that it's that recent. Off course, I an't deny that we have a common ancestor. Human-like apes left Africa very early (in my theory), and evolved into humans independently from each other. That's why different races exsist: they evolved ndependently, and later interbred, which created smaller races, such as Turanid (Europid+Mongoloid mix) and Etiopid (Europid+Negroid mix).
MiracleKD18 1 year ago
@MiracleKD18 Well that definitely didn't happen. There's no evidence for that. People are much much too alike for that to be true. But there may have early Homo sapiens groups who left Africa, later absorbed into the main group when haploid group M left. After all, some Neanderthal DNA markers have been discovered in modern humans.
There's no genetic bases for functionally different "races". That's an idea adopted by Europeans in the 16th century to justify colonizing the New World.
TacticusPrime 1 year ago
@MiracleKD18 Wow, its must be hard being that stupid!!
maddoxhell 1 year ago
@maddoxhell
You just can't accept the truth, because you are brainwashed by Afrocentricists and Jews.
MiracleKD18 1 year ago
@MiracleKD18 Sure I am.... Don't try and think too hard now!! Don't want you hurting yourself!!
maddoxhell 1 year ago
@MiracleKD18: Sorry. There appears to be voluminous evidence for it. It could have still been doubted before genomic research became available, but that has pretty much put the kibosh on the distributed theory. Our ancestors came from Africa; get over it.
puncheex 1 year ago
@puncheex
The “Out of Africa” myth is a theory put forth not by actual scientists but by left-wing liberal arts professors. The theory is not based on any scientific evidence, but on social and political dogma. Often, the science departments at liberal Universities are bullied into accepting such hogwash by leftist University heads.
Please watch my video "My Racial Theory".
MiracleKD18 1 year ago
@MiracleKD18: I don't concur on that. While the multiregional hypothesis may have been considered supported by some data as late as the 70s, the amount of genomic data collected since then has generally promoted the Out of Africa theory to the point that few academics or members of the scientific community have doubts about it, excepting certain nationalistic groups who desire to have originated in their countries, such as China.
puncheex 1 year ago
@puncheex
There is a funny thing about facts: even if you hide thme, they are still facts.
In the Westen World, the multiregional hypothesis is regarded as "racist" and "politically incorrect" LOL.
Damn, this is SCIENCE, not POLITICS!
At least the Chinese scientists are brave enough to question the most widely accepted and search for the truth.
MiracleKD18 1 year ago