Did they put the open corporate 10 bolt in it too? That launch was scary to say the least! PS discard half of the comments below, while their points are valid, their #'s are off.
it doesnt matter what moter u have u can make it go like stink,theres lots of power adders, buick grand nationals are an awesome example of what a turbo can do, putting a powerfull turbo'd v6 in a vette is a smart move less weight and its all about power 2 weight and power 2 the ground ,this is an awesome vid thx,,look what happens when u turbo a huge moter check out spirro pappas or tym lynch... pretty sick
@swiftwood Thankfully the Vette has been V8 always unless they slipped something in in the early 50s...! This car had a Buick GN drivetrain. Just a FYI, the 1987 Buick Grand National was the fastest production car of the year. The GNX was even faster and quicker! I believe that this lead to the return of the Vette from mediocracy. I'd still beyond love to have a '90 ZR1...
@CamaroFro - A 265 cubic inch V8 was first offered as an option in '55. Standard engine was a 235 cubic inch inline-6, NOT V6, for '53-'55. NO 6 cylinder engine was offered after 1955.
@CamaroFro And quite wrong you are only two engine configurations were ever offered in corvettes. A "blue flame" inline 6 or the V8 from 283cid up to 454cid.
@raceworld63 except the evil turbo hiss and screaming rubber on a turbo 6 car. chevy v8's were dogs in the 80's, my friend has a 1980 corvette from california with the smogged out 305 and my 95 lesabre can outrun it. I've tried it. thing takes about 11 seconds to hit 60
People put Chevy engines in everything so what's the fuss! He kept it all GM & it ran a 9.79 talk about a sleeper! Shoot I'd love to put a Buick turbo v6 in a '53 'Vette if I could lhh! Nice swap talk about saving nose weight
@ShotgunKelly2 no not in the 80's and 90's. The vette motors were only 300hp compaired to the turbo v6 which made 300 in stock tune, and it weighed much less.
Actually, the 80's vettes had a few different motors from 1984-1991, none of which came close to 300hp. Most pushed out around 210hp, absolute dogs. In 1992 they received the LT1, which was rated at 300hp. The GNX motors where underrated at 276HP, but put out a crazy amount of torque (around 360 ft. lbs), which is what made them fast.
In the late 1980's? No, it wasn't. which is in fact why they stopped producing the engine. Most powerful/faster than corvette cars are the biggest no-no for GM.
@ShotgunKelly2 Hp is a funny thing. Torque will tell you more about a cars acceleration where as Hp is kind of an indicator as to how long it will accelerate. For instance, the corvette L98 has 250hp + 345 ft-lbs of torque & the 93 LT1 has 300hp + 340 ft-lbs. In a race the L98 will pull ahead 1st but because it must shift sooner the LT1 lays down power longer and takes the lead. So an engine with 245 hp and 355 lb·ft is a tad quicker than the L98 and may even hold off a 92 LT1.
Totally insane!!! Might need some chassis tuning or locking diff?!?!! Wonder what happened to the Grand national doner car? Just seems more rare than a vette, sorry, not a corvette fan.
this is what gm should of did from the jump instead of killing the grand national because it was faster than the vette. gm,make a new grand national with a turbo 3.6(out of the new camaro that has 304hp without a turbo) and rear wheel drive. oh and make it a coupe!i know you like doin 4 doors
aha, okey ;) Post some video when your done then :D Im driving a 1972 Corvette with the new LS7 in ;) Its a lovly engine! so much power all the way from the bottom to the end :D
@mengle2004 someone correct me if I am wrong but I thought C4 has almost perfect 50/50 with the stock engine, due to sitting so far back in the chassis. (witness the protrusion of the transmission hump.
Of course less weight is always better, I imagine if you never ran a full tank of gas it wouldn't upset it much, maybe pull the spare. 170,000 miles in my 86, never got a flat anyway.
Now that is the engine that should have been in the 80's C4 vettes to start off with. the vette would have had over 300 horse power and it would be lighter. but of course GM had to start the C4 vette off with a shitty 185 horse power V8 and a four speed manual LOL. But the 90's C4's are WAY better than the older C4's.
At first I thought, now why would anybody want to do that, then you see the numbers at the end of the track and go, OHHH, that is why... LOL Long live the Buick Turbo, even if it lives in a Vette... He he he
Legend has it some of the GM brass were at the dragstrip in 1986 and, after watching a certain turbo V6 G-body sedan smoke the crap out of a 1986 Corvette, they decided to axe the entire G-body platform. Somebody should have told them to make the 231T V6 a Corvette option.
Even though a Corvette comes with a great engine, I would think that the turbo V6 would be a good match for the car. With the car's rear suspension, the turbo would be great by making its power peak after the car gets moving.
Its hard for the IRS to live a long time with big power right off the line.
That's my good friends car.Yes, at buick v6 I will put some better video's up. The car can go high eights if he cranks the boost.He doesn't crank the boost at the track because he breaks half shafts like crazzy. Even custom built hardened one. He drives the car in the summer around Toronto .
The driver was testing that day. He holds the boost at the line and doesn't really race it. That is a old video. He never cranks the boost. The car can go high 8's but he drives it on the street and he kind of runs out of injector. He has 90 pound injector and he would have to change them 160 lbs and you lose streetability.I have a never video . look under bigmikegn.
I just blew the motor in my 94 and am shopping for a new motor. The GN motor had crossed my mind but I want it in much higher horsepower than the stock 245 or GNX 300hp. I wonder how much work went into that motor and if you can just bolt it up to the stock 94 auto transmission. I also wonder what kind of tires he was running. Sure appreciate any answers out there as I have to decide what engine that I want to go with in the next few days so they can order it.
a stage 2 buick is way lighter than a gen 1 small block, and handles lots of power. it's made to handle turbos. turbos aren't even a power adder anymore...they're responsible for the majority of the power!
seeing that dave mclellan called the gn a one trick pony, this is called poetic justice...a fast car that handles.
Now that's definitely somethin' new, a Grand National turbocharged V-6 in a Corvette?, dayamm, that's crazy, I'd like to see a Grand National vs. a Corvette, Camaro, GTO, Mustang, Hemi and so on.....
In '86 the Grand National was the fastest production car in the USA. In '87 the Buick GNX throttled all! As a former owner of 2 Pontiac Trans Am's (79 and 97), and a 94 Corvette, and a current 06 GTO owner, I'd say the 87 Buick GNX would still whip any "production" car made... Even today. Stock ride to stock ride; The Buick may not have the torque, but there is miniscual turbo lag. It'll still run the 1/4 with the best of 'em 20 years later...
I agree with you to a point and I also currently own a 30,000 mile 94 Vette with a 700hp 383 in it. The Buick's were the fastest production cars of the day I also had a regular GN in 87 but they were only the fastest until that damn chip shut them down at 126mph. You did'nt dare risk the warranty back then either by trying to get to that chip in the computer. They are still great cars today and can still beat up on a lot of todays new cars. Love them GN's & GNX's
It's not really all that new. There have been plenty of LC2 hybrid cars, including c4 corvettes, for a good 10 years now. I'v seen it all from Buick powered RX-7's, Datsun 240Z's, Foxbody's, even a geo metro.
kind of hard to beat the sound of a blown 6. i miss my ttype...11:20's @ 120 basic bolt on..champion, te 62, dequick front mount not much...nice job in the vette
Most import racers i have met say it how it really is, if they win they beat a big bad muscle car... if they lose, so what hes in a tiny import with a small motor "of course" he was going to lose. Win win situation. The way ive heard people say it about us muscle car drivers, if we win "well no shit its designed to drag race" If we lose "ha ha slow ass american gas hog piece of shit" -.-
U guys kno how import drivers always say our engines are bigger when they lose.I'd like to see a turbo supra race your car and hear their excuse when they lose ,i'm curious what they'd come up with.
most import guys that are running that fast arnt your run of the mill RICER that your confusing them with. ask john shepherd what his excuse was for losing to a single turbo mustang...he dosnt have one. but at the end of the day its still running 7.70 with 2.0 liters
A stock LT-1 Vette 92-96 as well as those other Vettes you mention will also spank the crap out of a stock supra. When my 94 Vette was still stock I did it on a regular basis, my neighbor has a newer supra. I think the supra would take out the borish L98 tuned port motor though. There is not a lot of difference between the LT-1 and LT-4 when you have driven both cars and even if the LT-1 was an automatic tranny.
actually your wrong the 92 vette at best is a 14sec car and so is your 94 stock the supra's ran low to mid 13's all day so I highly doubt you beat supras daily and even in 96 the corvette was a low to mid 13sec car so really being so closely matched you can say its a drivers race......spanking the crap....that just sounds like an uneducated bias opinion.......next time talk what you know
GM did it for the TransAm, so I don't see why not.
I know thre at least one guy who autocrosses one.
BTW It's legal in SCCA SM2
More info on this particular car:
It's a 4.1 Buick, There were only like 10 of them blocks made and GM basically gave them away to the highest bidder(or something like that) He got ahold of one and built it up, if I remember right, he has(not all the time) ran 36 psi.
This is not even close to a stock 3.8 turbo btw. It's sick either way but there is alot of work in this car. More than just boost.
joecdm100 3 months ago
that vette is lighter thanks to the V6
Mexside619 4 months ago
Did they put the open corporate 10 bolt in it too? That launch was scary to say the least! PS discard half of the comments below, while their points are valid, their #'s are off.
bonesvette 4 months ago
Sick.
drgonzo767 5 months ago
@swiftwood Yo but the 2013/2014 Vette is gonna have an optional Turbo V6 model!!
dmackasd1 6 months ago
it doesnt matter what moter u have u can make it go like stink,theres lots of power adders, buick grand nationals are an awesome example of what a turbo can do, putting a powerfull turbo'd v6 in a vette is a smart move less weight and its all about power 2 weight and power 2 the ground ,this is an awesome vid thx,,look what happens when u turbo a huge moter check out spirro pappas or tym lynch... pretty sick
dmichaylow 7 months ago
That's a disgrace to Chevy!! jk lol
dsm525 8 months ago
This is what they should've put in the vette.
turbomoore 9 months ago
I've seen this car in person. It is a modified GN motor with a Much larger turbo. Crazy fast!
PontiacKid2 10 months ago
The Ann edition TA back in 89 had this engine as well. It was the fastest TA of it's time. Did 0-60 in under 5 seconds.
deezomaxima 1 year ago
wicked
wickedklwn1 1 year ago
so many il informed thing a v8 is always better!!! so worng!
tastings4life 1 year ago
@VetteAholicZ06
A friend has a 1953 Corvette in his shop
It has the original inline 6.
swiftwood 1 year ago
@swiftwood Very nice. Those are probably so rare!
VetteAholicZ06 1 year ago
Actully it was a stright 6 cylinder in the old vettes
84shortwide1 1 year ago
no a gnx will whoop a vette any day, search buick gnx vs c4, the buick gnx won.
Chrisskateboarding 1 year ago
Probably the Only V6 corvette in the World!
CHEVYCAMARO4GEN 1 year ago
@CHEVYCAMARO4GEN
wrong, the Corvette didnt receive a V8 until 1955 and the V6 was an option until 1957
CamaroFro 1 year ago
a V6 was never offered in a Corvette.
swiftwood 1 year ago 14
@swiftwood no but it was offered with an inline 6 with three two barrel carburetors
jonevans20 1 year ago
@swiftwood actually when vettes first started out they were inline 6's, however, i wouldnt do this but that is a bad car an somethin unique
scoumis 1 year ago
@swiftwood Correcto it was an inline Blue Flame Special not to be confused the the blue plate special.
SCBianchi 1 year ago
@swiftwood they did have an I6 though
GavinSpenceR18 9 months ago
@swiftwood Thankfully the Vette has been V8 always unless they slipped something in in the early 50s...! This car had a Buick GN drivetrain. Just a FYI, the 1987 Buick Grand National was the fastest production car of the year. The GNX was even faster and quicker! I believe that this lead to the return of the Vette from mediocracy. I'd still beyond love to have a '90 ZR1...
normynoless 5 months ago
@CamaroFro it was a strait six
corekid420 1 year ago
@CamaroFro - A 265 cubic inch V8 was first offered as an option in '55. Standard engine was a 235 cubic inch inline-6, NOT V6, for '53-'55. NO 6 cylinder engine was offered after 1955.
speedsalot 1 year ago
@CamaroFro And quite wrong you are only two engine configurations were ever offered in corvettes. A "blue flame" inline 6 or the V8 from 283cid up to 454cid.
buzzboy7 1 year ago
@CamaroFro Buick built GM's first mass produced v6 starting in 1961-the 225v6 was used until 1967 then sold to jeep I believe
series1riv 1 year ago
how could you change a v8 for a v6!!! theres nothing better than v8 roar
raceworld63 1 year ago
@raceworld63 except the evil turbo hiss and screaming rubber on a turbo 6 car. chevy v8's were dogs in the 80's, my friend has a 1980 corvette from california with the smogged out 305 and my 95 lesabre can outrun it. I've tried it. thing takes about 11 seconds to hit 60
buyfarmfresheggs 9 months ago
That's one BADDDD Corvette.
drizzetsrevenge 1 year ago
People put Chevy engines in everything so what's the fuss! He kept it all GM & it ran a 9.79 talk about a sleeper! Shoot I'd love to put a Buick turbo v6 in a '53 'Vette if I could lhh! Nice swap talk about saving nose weight
bop455 1 year ago
GM should have offered this as a secondary model!.
vfIskullangel 1 year ago
the grand national was the best thing to come from the 80s from the US.
hopefully the donor car didnt suffer too much
OMGItsWeasel 1 year ago 14
@OMGItsWeasel thats prolly a full on race motor from keith black or somewhere like that I sure hope no gn were harmed in the making of that beast
maplelaffs 1 year ago
That goes to show you if you can't beat them, inherit their power plant.
walkerscranger 1 year ago
I love the sound!
westfabrications 2 years ago
Nice, that monster has a mean launch to it.
DisturbedOne0089 2 years ago
isn't a corvette engine stronger than a GN's engine?
ShotgunKelly2 2 years ago
He's running the special Indy block in it.
You can get stronger smallblocks
I'm building an LT1 out of an F-body
Special splayed caps for my Vortech blower.
swiftwood 2 years ago
@ShotgunKelly2 no not in the 80's and 90's. The vette motors were only 300hp compaired to the turbo v6 which made 300 in stock tune, and it weighed much less.
nascarnutt88 1 year ago
@nascarnutt88
Actually, the 80's vettes had a few different motors from 1984-1991, none of which came close to 300hp. Most pushed out around 210hp, absolute dogs. In 1992 they received the LT1, which was rated at 300hp. The GNX motors where underrated at 276HP, but put out a crazy amount of torque (around 360 ft. lbs), which is what made them fast.
4mulaBaby 1 year ago
@ShotgunKelly2 DId that look as strong as the original motor? lol That thing rolled out. GN's are sick. Sorry for the donor car.
badlilstang 1 year ago
@ShotgunKelly2 he most likely did it to be different.
jtre86 1 year ago
@ShotgunKelly2
In the late 1980's? No, it wasn't. which is in fact why they stopped producing the engine. Most powerful/faster than corvette cars are the biggest no-no for GM.
4mulaBaby 1 year ago
@ShotgunKelly2 Hp is a funny thing. Torque will tell you more about a cars acceleration where as Hp is kind of an indicator as to how long it will accelerate. For instance, the corvette L98 has 250hp + 345 ft-lbs of torque & the 93 LT1 has 300hp + 340 ft-lbs. In a race the L98 will pull ahead 1st but because it must shift sooner the LT1 lays down power longer and takes the lead. So an engine with 245 hp and 355 lb·ft is a tad quicker than the L98 and may even hold off a 92 LT1.
bronxboyXXX 5 months ago
Totally insane!!! Might need some chassis tuning or locking diff?!?!! Wonder what happened to the Grand national doner car? Just seems more rare than a vette, sorry, not a corvette fan.
mustanguy77 2 years ago
thats a v6? dear god (and he faints) ok back , i can finally justify my love for the v6
falshami 2 years ago 2
It being a V6 means nothing in the way of power you know.
hjjfffaa 1 year ago
this is what gm should of did from the jump instead of killing the grand national because it was faster than the vette. gm,make a new grand national with a turbo 3.6(out of the new camaro that has 304hp without a turbo) and rear wheel drive. oh and make it a coupe!i know you like doin 4 doors
BLACKLACDTS 2 years ago
wow that launch.....its scary!
frankvtec88 2 years ago
thats sweet the launch was wild looking
hellfish271 2 years ago
Dayum, prolly would have done better with a good launch. That car weighs about 3200 pounds vs. the big Buick.
6irondriver 2 years ago
sweet!
turbomoore 2 years ago
I loved that take off. It is a lot lighter in the front than before. I wonder how it handles with the lighter engine. Closer to 50 50 than before.
mengle2004 2 years ago
They're about 51/49 from the factory
That light and engine may give you 49/51
swiftwood 2 years ago
Nice ride! :p But how much do you think that V6 weight compared to a LS7 Corvette engine? Is it your vette?
CorvetteMichael 2 years ago
Not sure, I'd have to look it up
It's not my car.
I've got an LT1 that I'm building into a 383 with a Vortech blower.
swiftwood 2 years ago
aha, okey ;) Post some video when your done then :D Im driving a 1972 Corvette with the new LS7 in ;) Its a lovly engine! so much power all the way from the bottom to the end :D
CorvetteMichael 2 years ago
@swiftwood Can't wait for vids!! This one of the c4 is nasty....is that a "stock" 3.8l turbo from the GN? That's a stick launch.
wfangnxd117 2 years ago
depends if they kept the trans axle in the rear or ran a standard trans with a buick rear end therefore it would probably still be 51-49
glhman222 2 years ago
C4's don't have transaxles
The trans is directly behind the engine.
The diff is separate and in the back.
swiftwood 2 years ago
my bad c5s have transaxles
glhman222 2 years ago
@mengle2004 someone correct me if I am wrong but I thought C4 has almost perfect 50/50 with the stock engine, due to sitting so far back in the chassis. (witness the protrusion of the transmission hump.
Of course less weight is always better, I imagine if you never ran a full tank of gas it wouldn't upset it much, maybe pull the spare. 170,000 miles in my 86, never got a flat anyway.
batvette 1 year ago
Now that is the engine that should have been in the 80's C4 vettes to start off with. the vette would have had over 300 horse power and it would be lighter. but of course GM had to start the C4 vette off with a shitty 185 horse power V8 and a four speed manual LOL. But the 90's C4's are WAY better than the older C4's.
workensmart 2 years ago
gotta love the gm 6s!! The sound is up their with the Supras!
westfabrications 2 years ago
SWEET RIDE MAN,, thats something you dont see everyday,, lol a v6 vette,, i like it,
IRONSEAN7 2 years ago
way better than a supra.. we have pushrods!! and larger bore
MIketucky350 2 years ago
it is sick but it does not sound right
neres818 2 years ago
Sweet, what a launch!!!
davoe1976 2 years ago
ok we have an 87 GN and a 40th annv. vette hmm imma switch engines hehe JK
Petriella13 2 years ago
if you could find a 1989 turbo trans am you would have the best of both worlds.
heavyxpress3000 2 years ago
3.8s are awesome, lol.
Gastualfulkan 2 years ago 3
one quick vette
neil1jnr 2 years ago
WANT.
letterpool 2 years ago
holy fuck!!! i want that
nevermindthedog 2 years ago
At first I thought, now why would anybody want to do that, then you see the numbers at the end of the track and go, OHHH, that is why... LOL Long live the Buick Turbo, even if it lives in a Vette... He he he
DunneRite 2 years ago 3
Why is it that every Corvette video on youtube has some jerk reply with something about Superas?
Toyota Supers are shity cars,even Toyota thinks so or they would still be making them.
Look kids,it's just like a Mustang.
Yes you can buy a bunch of crap to make it go fast in a straight line but you can never overcome the total lack of performance in all other areas.
Give it a f#@king rest...........nobody is or will ever be impressed.
sirhcskoorb 2 years ago 2
Sweet!!!
guyver280z 2 years ago 2
Legend has it some of the GM brass were at the dragstrip in 1986 and, after watching a certain turbo V6 G-body sedan smoke the crap out of a 1986 Corvette, they decided to axe the entire G-body platform. Somebody should have told them to make the 231T V6 a Corvette option.
iluvbuickgnx 3 years ago
you are so right the never listen though.
themechanic56 2 years ago
I always come back to this vid and watch this car, I love it
redhot916spd 3 years ago
I love seeing shit like this. Well done.
tuor1984 3 years ago
Well, all I have to say is, Fuck Yeah.
drgonzo767 3 years ago
Even though a Corvette comes with a great engine, I would think that the turbo V6 would be a good match for the car. With the car's rear suspension, the turbo would be great by making its power peak after the car gets moving.
Its hard for the IRS to live a long time with big power right off the line.
Greg9942 3 years ago
It sure is fast, but why did they take out the original V8 engine? Couldn't they just upgrade that instead?
wildbloodydragon 3 years ago 2
Here is a link to another video from when we took the car to Kentuckey in 2004. Again low boost and off the foot brake on 17 inch drag radials.
BigMikegn 3 years ago
Imagine if GN's had the handling ability of Corvettes
boss12 3 years ago
bad ass!
USWAbrother 3 years ago
That's my good friends car.Yes, at buick v6 I will put some better video's up. The car can go high eights if he cranks the boost.He doesn't crank the boost at the track because he breaks half shafts like crazzy. Even custom built hardened one. He drives the car in the summer around Toronto .
BigMikegn 3 years ago
They make 31 splined shafts now, if you friends interested.
Glad he kept the IRS!
swiftwood 3 years ago
i couldnt really see it was it a posi rear?
ag54981 3 years ago
Yes, it's a posi.
All C4 Corvettes came with them.
Getting it to live with all that power is the trick.
swiftwood 3 years ago
What happened the the GN? I love those cars...
Fubieman 3 years ago
Holy shit, that thing moves...NICE!!!
kimokanka 3 years ago
That dude's reaction time is off, he waited nearly 3/4's of a second before hitting the gas.
sirbuick 3 years ago
He's the only one running.
Maybe he was checking something, but your right.
swiftwood 3 years ago
Sounds like he was spooling up the turbo. That thing is brutal.
70camaro406 3 years ago
The driver was testing that day. He holds the boost at the line and doesn't really race it. That is a old video. He never cranks the boost. The car can go high 8's but he drives it on the street and he kind of runs out of injector. He has 90 pound injector and he would have to change them 160 lbs and you lose streetability.I have a never video . look under bigmikegn.
BigMikegn 2 years ago
I just blew the motor in my 94 and am shopping for a new motor. The GN motor had crossed my mind but I want it in much higher horsepower than the stock 245 or GNX 300hp. I wonder how much work went into that motor and if you can just bolt it up to the stock 94 auto transmission. I also wonder what kind of tires he was running. Sure appreciate any answers out there as I have to decide what engine that I want to go with in the next few days so they can order it.
BIGGREENLEAF1 3 years ago
I added a link to a thread on the Corvette forum about the car.
swiftwood 3 years ago
i like that
pagehouse4 3 years ago
Where's Chris Chow's GN? It got smoked by the 3.8!
RoberBabro 3 years ago
Thats exactly how the new ZR1 is going to go down the track when it comes out.
memanmike 4 years ago
The new ZR1 will be quick, but it ain't runnin' no 9's in factory trim.
N20LT4 3 years ago
a stage 2 buick is way lighter than a gen 1 small block, and handles lots of power. it's made to handle turbos. turbos aren't even a power adder anymore...they're responsible for the majority of the power!
seeing that dave mclellan called the gn a one trick pony, this is called poetic justice...a fast car that handles.
dabomb882 4 years ago
Now that's definitely somethin' new, a Grand National turbocharged V-6 in a Corvette?, dayamm, that's crazy, I'd like to see a Grand National vs. a Corvette, Camaro, GTO, Mustang, Hemi and so on.....
VayLoc310 4 years ago
In '86 the Grand National was the fastest production car in the USA. In '87 the Buick GNX throttled all! As a former owner of 2 Pontiac Trans Am's (79 and 97), and a 94 Corvette, and a current 06 GTO owner, I'd say the 87 Buick GNX would still whip any "production" car made... Even today. Stock ride to stock ride; The Buick may not have the torque, but there is miniscual turbo lag. It'll still run the 1/4 with the best of 'em 20 years later...
normygto 4 years ago
I agree with you to a point and I also currently own a 30,000 mile 94 Vette with a 700hp 383 in it. The Buick's were the fastest production cars of the day I also had a regular GN in 87 but they were only the fastest until that damn chip shut them down at 126mph. You did'nt dare risk the warranty back then either by trying to get to that chip in the computer. They are still great cars today and can still beat up on a lot of todays new cars. Love them GN's & GNX's
BIGGREENLEAF1 3 years ago
It's not really all that new. There have been plenty of LC2 hybrid cars, including c4 corvettes, for a good 10 years now. I'v seen it all from Buick powered RX-7's, Datsun 240Z's, Foxbody's, even a geo metro.
DrBIeed 4 years ago
kind of hard to beat the sound of a blown 6. i miss my ttype...11:20's @ 120 basic bolt on..champion, te 62, dequick front mount not much...nice job in the vette
9secondsflat 4 years ago
Well I've finally taken the plunge myself.
I just bought a vortec for my LT1 :)
V8 and a blower!
swiftwood 4 years ago
Now put the V8 back in and stick a turbo or two on it.
bronxboyXXX 4 years ago
wow, that's a fast vette.
YanFU 4 years ago
WOW!
bronxboyXXX 4 years ago
Most import racers i have met say it how it really is, if they win they beat a big bad muscle car... if they lose, so what hes in a tiny import with a small motor "of course" he was going to lose. Win win situation. The way ive heard people say it about us muscle car drivers, if we win "well no shit its designed to drag race" If we lose "ha ha slow ass american gas hog piece of shit" -.-
TripleNyneX 4 years ago 4
Check out the youtube video "unexpectally fast corvette". I'm sure you'll laugh as hard as I did...
normygto 4 years ago
U guys kno how import drivers always say our engines are bigger when they lose.I'd like to see a turbo supra race your car and hear their excuse when they lose ,i'm curious what they'd come up with.
tctman9 4 years ago
most import guys that are running that fast arnt your run of the mill RICER that your confusing them with. ask john shepherd what his excuse was for losing to a single turbo mustang...he dosnt have one. but at the end of the day its still running 7.70 with 2.0 liters
EightYourVtec 4 years ago
damn that thing is fast great swap!
disturbedproject 4 years ago
Was it only spinning one tire?
splitplug 4 years ago
Both are spinning. It's just a little hard to see.
swiftwood 4 years ago
I love it bout time someone cross bred a chevy!
bop455 4 years ago
rofl... it's a GM motor in a GM car, not really too much cross breading going on their.
Kernavitch 4 years ago
hey, lrt's hang another turbo off the other side, and see how much more we can get the rear to hitch out upon launch.
seriously, though, sweet ride.
musewolfman 4 years ago
hell yeah, that's the way to go. now go fight supras!
ztwntyn8 4 years ago
stock for stock a few C4 Corvettes would spank the Supra such as the 1986-90 GM warrantied L98 Callaway twin turbo, any 1990-95 ZR-1 & 96 Lt-4.
bronxboyXXX 4 years ago
A stock LT-1 Vette 92-96 as well as those other Vettes you mention will also spank the crap out of a stock supra. When my 94 Vette was still stock I did it on a regular basis, my neighbor has a newer supra. I think the supra would take out the borish L98 tuned port motor though. There is not a lot of difference between the LT-1 and LT-4 when you have driven both cars and even if the LT-1 was an automatic tranny.
BIGGREENLEAF1 3 years ago
actually your wrong the 92 vette at best is a 14sec car and so is your 94 stock the supra's ran low to mid 13's all day so I highly doubt you beat supras daily and even in 96 the corvette was a low to mid 13sec car so really being so closely matched you can say its a drivers race......spanking the crap....that just sounds like an uneducated bias opinion.......next time talk what you know
supraturboLBJ 2 years ago
Mine stock 95 runs low 13's, it's all a matter of getting it to hook up.
swiftwood 2 years ago
He doesn't know what he's talking about, 1992 lt1 6 speed manual runs0-60 in 5.0 sec, 13.6 1/4 mile. 300 hp/330 lb ft torque,
junechris 2 years ago 6
i agree... awesome swap
oceanpacific7272 4 years ago
wow my favourite car with my second favourite cars engine it's a bonus now all it needs is a sexy girl
91c4vette 4 years ago
Now theres an interesting little combo ya dont see every day....
SimpleYetEffective 4 years ago
Best swap ever.
xalteridemx 4 years ago
GM did it for the TransAm, so I don't see why not.
I know thre at least one guy who autocrosses one.
BTW It's legal in SCCA SM2
More info on this particular car:
It's a 4.1 Buick, There were only like 10 of them blocks made and GM basically gave them away to the highest bidder(or something like that) He got ahold of one and built it up, if I remember right, he has(not all the time) ran 36 psi.
swiftwood 4 years ago
What?
4.1 blocks are very common. A rod/piston 4.1 is a common motor to put together for GN's as well.
xxbulaxx 4 years ago
It's the heavy duty version of the block that the Indycar guys used
swiftwood 4 years ago
That engine should have came stock in the Vette. Better handling too, I bet.
boostedballs 4 years ago