Why are people trying to defame Adam and claim he is a fraud with foolish arguments like "jedi mind trick". Are you fucking serious? He's making jokes about it all. He is not a reporter so anyone who hates him for not saying much during this broadcast is fucking brainwashed. How many normal people would you want to see talk on tv on a regular basis. He's just another human being not some well groomed corporate cocksucker like the rest you all love to see on the news so much.
..this pieces of shit are agents provocateurs...they want to incite civil unrest as an excuse for martial law...how do i know? NORMAL PEOPLE SELDOM DANCE WITHOUT MUSIC ...those 'dancers' are undercover cops, agent provocateurs, trying to give the excuse for martial law.....in "part 2" (also available on youtube) they did bring some miserable "music" but i can assure you that this is sort of "music" that only cops and nuns could dance to...i seek pole shift survival group...
he asked holder about ending the drug was to help lessen police casualties?why? fuck those pigs,he should have asked wouldnt save users and addicts lives,and stop crime,what about people on drug probation that are dying because they are forced into doing new synthetic leagal drugs/"research chemicals" drugs?which are more dangerous and dont show in a court ordered drug test
Adam got question cops came into my house without a search warrant and without my permission im pretty sure that isnt legal just seeing what i can do about this.
@RsNoob1011 Nothing. Just opening the door for them is enough. If they happen to smell or suspect illegal activity they can enter your home without a warrant. Some states they don't even need a warrant. The best bet is to call the cops out on site, it's hard after the fact.
@wolfwatcher25 the Police do not have a right to tell you stop a peaceful or non-violent protest. By dancing silently these people where doing just that. What e police did here was incredibly wrong and if you can't see that you my friend are an idiot.
@stillyross from what I read of your argument with wolfwatcher, I agree with you. Clearly wolfwatcher doesn't understand laws at all.
@redace236 No, they do not IF YOU GET THE right paperwork filled out. it's simple, and before you start about me needing to learn the Law, in 2004 I passed the MBE in Louisianna. I think I know slightly more about the United States Penal Code then yourself. And I know the law on peaceful gathering. As the dancing was a CELEBRATION stated by Adam (who is a douch I think) then he needed to fill out the proper forms for it with the city office. Failure to do so means the police where in the right.
You're such and ass Adam. You didnt cooperate with the cop, you get what you deserve. I'm for freedom of people and expression, but dancing at a memorial is showing disrespect in a place of sacred honor. You disobey the warning, they give you the cuffs. end of story
@RANDOMFREAKSHOWCO Wait a minute, you're for the 'freedom of people' and their right to express themselves, but when someone behaves 'disrespectful' in the regards of a controversial manner while remaining peaceful you believe an officer of the law has the right to detain you despite no law having been violated.
Wasn't the first amendment created to protect those of us who do go against the public-quo? How can you say you are for the freedoms of the people if you believe so?
A shame on u american media, CNN, FOX and others u r completely corrupted so u force guys like Adam to go and work for Russian TV to provide real his point of view. Look at u! Soviet Russia was your enemy number one for very long time and look... this is only media u can actually watch in US. Total shame on u! Yes, they made some space for Ron Paul, but all they do is to make him a todays Howard Beale (Network movie) the articulator (jester) of the public anger and truth, but they dont care...
Yeah. First? I saw Medea and her "friend" there (which I WAS happy to see, since I am a member of Code-Pink Austin). .and then? I read the DUMBASS comments. (Man, I have not been cursing on YT, for quite some time, ,but this ticks me off). The ridiculous take-down (of too many folk, for "dancing:) was enough to bother me, but then the asinine commentary about YOU> I don;t even know what to say about these fools..calling you "CIA", "Covert Ops?, blah blah- almost funny, but too stupid- them
I noticed that cop too but i never thought Adam was a fraud. I took it as being the cop having some sort of a vendetta against him. If people really thought this was some sort of a joke or fraud, they really need to open their eyes.
Now, I will say this. Adam, you desevered getting slammed as you were resisting arrest. In accordance with the law which states; physically struggling to get out from being restrained (handcuffed or put into the police vehicle). Now you are a big guy, I'm 6'3" and 210lbs, and I wouldn't have wanted to wrestle with you either, I'd have put you down just as hard. Sorry Adam, but I believe you were wrong and got what you deserved.
@stillyross By resist Unlawful arrest it means that you can contest it in a court of law. I could direct you to the proper case file if you wanted. Unfortunately being asked to stop dancing falls under the reasonable request by a law enforcement officer clause. That he didn't, was unlawful. Of course if he filed a proper form with the city asking premission for a peaceful demonstration then it wouldn't have been a problem either. Knowledge Bomb denied.
@wolfwatcher25 “Citizens may resist unlawful arrest to the point of taking an arresting officer's life if necessary.” Plummer v. State, 136 Ind. 306. This premise was upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case: John Bad Elk v. U.S., 177 U.S. 529
@stillyross One feels it is also notable that the first case file you mentioned Plummer v. State, was a court case from the 1800's and was decided by the Indiana Supreme Court not the US Supreme Court. John Bad Elf V. U.S. was upheld by the US Supreme Court...in the year 1900. But I like were you were going. If you read the cases transcript available in a law text book, you will see that you are wrong; they do NOT support resisting arrest unless your life is in direct danger.
@stillyross In most of these cases resisting was legal due to the officer not giving notice that they were indeed a police officer or do to the belief that the person being arrested was in direct danger of police brutality. Going to Constitution(dot)org, where all these cases are listed means nothing. The failure to comply with the lawful orders of a police office is grounds for arrest, to fight a police officer after that is resisting LAWFUL arrest and subject to fines and jail time
@wolfwatcher25 One could also mention, upon further reading of the case file available in the book that Plummer V. State, Plummer was fired at by the officer without the officer giving identification that he was a Policeman. Which has NOTHING to do with arrest and was a case of Self defense.
@stillyross direct quote from John Bad Elk V. US reads in the verdict as follows "It is the law that a person illegally arrested by an officer may resist that arrest, even to the extent of the taking of life if his own life or any great bodily harm is threatened." DIRECT QUOTE
@wolfwatcher25 In the end the case was dropped as soon as they came before a judge by the state. That tells me that those officers had no leg to stand on. Also no victom no crime. They were arrested for civil disobediance ( Definition - The refusal to comply with certain laws or to pay taxes and fines, as a peaceful form of political protest) and they were not protesting.
@stillyross My guess would be that the case was dropped because more than one hundred people decended on the Jefferson Memorial in response to Liberal Media making the police into Monsters. And I have seen most of the videos of this Farce online yes. Enough to know that Adam DIDN'T try to help anyone, he just danced. It was when he was being arrested for Failure to Obey the LAWFUL ORDERS OF THE POLICE when he resisted arrest that he was put on the ground and arrested.
@wolfwatcher25 Well to make the loop back to your original comment I responded to "he got what he deserved". It's sad that anyone would believe that. I am in the understanding that you served in the army, as I do now. I fight for freedoms as you did too, and to be honest I don't see whats wrong with anyone doing something silly in a public place. But when someone can lawfully stop someone from expressing themselves I see that as the begining of the end to our freedoms. Who was he hurting?
@stillyross I will admit that the throat grab was over the top and the officer should be cautioned for it, but the slam was acceptable. I was a memeber if the army yes, what Unit Are you In? And it has nothing to do with dancing, or if the police man was right in asking them to stop. It was a lawful order for them to do so and the police man had every right to ask it from them. If they had a problem, they could have put in a complaint, they SHOULD NOT have continued to dance.
@wolfwatcher25 If it's not illegal, I see no reason why the "have" to stop just because the say it's a lawfull order. While yes it would be the curtious thing to do, but the officer really had no grounds to do so. They really didn't hurt anyone, thats the point. I myself tend to be very firm on my grounds when dealing with officers of the law, we need to be in order to ensure they are doing their job and not bouncing around on power trips. Also I won't post a unit on here, but I work in NATO.
@stillyross I'm not sure why I am still arguing with this. They HAVE to stop because it was a REASONABLE and LAWFUL order of the Police. If the police say stop, you stop. To do otherwise is looking for trouble. You have the RIGHT to ask why you have to stop, take the police officers answer and lodge a complaint, but you do NOT have the right to disobey that LAWFUL and REASONABLE order. Oh and Because I said so, is not a valid reason from the police and if they say that, it'll go bad for them.
@wolfwatcher25 It's funny you say that, because through out the arrest video not one of those officers could state the law they were detaining them under. When asked I believe the reply was " we will get that for you in a little bit." which says 1 of 2 things, he doesn't know the laws he's vowed to uphold or he is in the wrong and needs to refer to the book to find a loophole to detain them anyways. If I'm being detained and the officer can't state why I would resist too.
@stillyross What it says to me is that the officers were BUSY DOING THEIR JOBS. If they answered every question when asked it would have taken longer. We do not know by this video shot probably by someone on Adam's payroll what was said. It would be that once all the arrests were done the questions were all answered. We don't know. And you would have been breaking the law in that resisting.
@stillyross Now Stillyross, I have been trying to make you understand the law, I have been trying to make you understand the rights, all of which we both agree on in principle. But you appear to live in a fantasy world were you can do whatever the hell you want and get away with it. If you resist a lawful order, you are breaking the law, if you resist arrest, the officer has the right to put you on the ground and cuff you. it's that simple. Adam broke the law. He got arrested. End.
@wolfwatcher25 you sir are by far stupidwith what you're saying is that also ANYONE who participates in a Flash Mob should be ARRESTED for hosting a flash mob that sounds reasonable..... police break the law more than an average citizen.
@RsNoob1011 Hello RsNoob, I am not exactly sure how you came to that conclusion from what I have said my friend. I NEVER said that people hosting a flash mob should be arrested. Hell, I've been in a flash mob against some rights being violated in Detroit. What I said was that Adam broke the law by not obeying the orders of a police officer and they were right to arrest him. He resisted arrest and they had the right to put him down and take him away. That is all. :)
@wolfwatcher25 actually just because you don't do what a police officer tells you, that doesn't equate the breaking of a law. If that were the case, they could request anything and arrest anyone for non obedience. Learn the law, and protect your rights.
@SinceretheGhost I refuse to explaine the difference between A lawful and non-lawful order or reseasonable request again to this board. It's getting tiresome now. A reasonable request can be ignored. Ignoring a lawful order is a violation. Read all my comments please before you comment to me please as I have already explained this once before.
@wolfwatcher25 I don't need you to explain the difference, and since you didn't specify in the post that I read I'm not going to go back and read all your old posts because well..I have a life, and don't care enough to do so. So like I said before, you do not have to listen to everything a cop says, which is obviously the case- there being a difference between lawful and unlawful requests. I don't care how many times you explained it, holds no bearing on what I was responding to.
@wolfwatcher25 and you are wrong, No law was broken only thing that was broken was the rights of the people , therefore no reason for an arrest to be made, if an officer told you to run across a busy road with your eyes closed and you did not obey the order would he be breaking the law ? NO !! WAKE up and go to us.gov and learn the law !!! Also if a bill is passed that is against the Constitution it is Unconstitutional Law and not enforcable !!!
@Gene4God there is actually an old obscure law that forbids dancing at a national monument. The main reason it was drafted was to prevent people from dancing on war memorials like the Tomb of The Unknowns.
@stillyross That is called SPOILING for a reaction, but then I would expect nothing less from the Liberal Media, which I put Adam in, than to try something like that. He and the rest were spoiling for a reaction or a fight. You'd have to be blind to see that they weren't.
@wolfwatcher25 I am not saying the were not, but it shows how screwed up or country is gettin. Someone who wants to dance in public place is harming no one. They should have never had to bring a situation like this to the public. You and I should never had to debate wether he is the right or wrong. That is how silly and irrelavent his actions were. Yet here we are, look at the whole picture, regaurdless of resisting arrest, do you think it was right that they approched him in such a manner.
@stillyross It is harming. It's harming/disruptive to the people who are there and are br respectful to the monument. Adam and the others there are nothing more than trouble seeking miscreants that have nothing better to do then to harass police. I'm sick of Youtube videos of people videotaping and harassing police who are trying to do their jobs. If you harass a cop things WILL get escalated and out of control, and yay, you got a cop with a family, in trouble. Nice job, ass.
@SonicLamb What I find sad is most police officers do not know their job or the laws they swear to uphold, further more the ones who consider themselves "above" the citizens they are there to protect. I don't see how you can speak for those who were at the momument the day of this incedent, it's not like they ran around punching people in the face. What if young child decided he wanted to dance at the memorial, should that police officer tell them they can't dance? It's irrelevent and harmless.
@stillyross Why are you comparing a child who doesn't know the law against a miscreant who does and decides to break it. A LAW was passed and Adam and his hooligan gang BROKE A LAW. I don't care how stupid you think it is, breaking a law is breaking a law. Cops arrest people who break a law...why is that so difficult to understand?
@SonicLamb - So tomorrow if they pass a new law that makes something that was legal, illegal,no matter how crazy this new law is, you wouldnt have a problem with the police enforcing it? If they made... singing in your car illegal you wouldnt have any problems with the police "just doing their jobs" ?........ I would. I would have a big problem with it
@CplPrimeaux No, I wouldn't. Enforcing laws is part of a police officers job. You having a problem with it makes me thing you are an anarchist will go out of his way to cause problems when there should be no problem. I don't care if you hate cops. I'm not fond of them myself, but if one told me to do something, I would do it because I don't want to be tazed/peppersprayed/beaten to a pulp. Why would anyone WANT that?
@SonicLamb (continue) Being a cop is a tough job, because of assholes like you going out of their way to cause problems. To qoute what I said earlier..."I'm sick of Youtube videos of people videotaping and harassing police who are trying to do their jobs. If you harass a cop things WILL get escalated and out of control, and yay, you got a cop with a family, in trouble. Nice job, ass."
@SonicLamb Conform, conform, conform.Sounds like someone who is scared to stand up for their rights. So what if a law was passed thit is an infingement of your rights, say like the Patriot Act or the NDAA, should we just do what we are told and not form a rukus. Who needs rights or individual thought when we can just let the government do it for us. I feel sorry for you, for the simple fact that you have given up freedom.
@SonicLamb Also I forgot to ad, I myself as soldier, willing to lay down MY life for YOUR rights and your worried about pepper spray or a beating that you would survive to stand up for your own rights. That is just plain said and as far as I'm concerned you are pissing all over every soldier for the simple fact that my brothers and sisters in arms would be willing to do the same and you refuse to use what they are willing to die for. Some citizen you are.
@SonicLamb You now hold a double standard, you don't have to know a law to break it. And as you stated "breaking a law is breaking a law." It does not matter if you know it's a law your still held to it. So are you saying that children are not held to tha law and should be able to do as they please?
@stillyross What right are you protecting from me? The right to act like an jackass micreant? I don't want to do that because I am respectful to others. Causing trouble is what normal people do. Please re-join us...it's not too late to be a memeber of society again.
@SonicLamb 1. I would much rather remain a soldier then to conform to what you think is an acceptiable socity. 2. You never answered my question, Should everyone be held to the law or are those who don't know the law exempt?
@wolfwatcher25 “Each person has the right to resist an unlawful arrest. In such a case, the person attempting the arrest stands in the position of a wrongdoer and may be resisted by the use of force, as in self- defense.” (State v. Mobley, 240 N.C. 476, 83 S.E. 2d 100).
@stillyross State V. Mobley, 1954 Mobley was arrested for Drunkeness, there was no law in the state against drunkeness at the time, therefore the arrest was Illegal. the Officers orders were UNLAWFUL.
@wolfwatcher25 “One may come to the aid of another being unlawfully arrested, just as he may where one is being assaulted, molested, raped or kidnapped. Thus it is not an offense to liberate one from the unlawful custody of an officer, even though he may have submitted to such custody, without resistance.” (Adams v. State, 121 Ga. 16, 48 S.E. 910).
@stillyross Adams V. State pretains to helping someone being Illegally arrested and in danger of brutaility by the arresting officer. it's also a case from 1904.
@wolfwatcher25 I threw that one in there because one of his buddies tried to block the arrest when it went to the ground. Also is body slaming and choking a citizen not brutality. Also just to make sure we are on the same page, you have seen the original arrest video?
@wolfwatcher25 If someone was putting you in an oven and it was the law that said you couldnt resist, would you resist? Now lets take that a lil less extreme, lets say a law enforcement officer told you not to kiss your girlfriend in public, would you accept such an order? Im 6'2" and 165 lbs, so im not a big guy, but I dont like feeling pain, so anyone who tries to "detain" me will have to work for it.
"Free speech is meant to protect unpopular speech. Popular speech, by definition, needs no protection." - Neal Boortz
Popular speech is also often mindless rhetoric of an enslaved people; who in thinking themselves to be engaging in independent thought, merely echo that which the master has ingrained into their subconscious and only allows them to voice.
And given the breadth of stupidity that enables govt, it would be apt to say "We the puppets"; as opposed to, "We the people."
@wolfwatcher25 Maybe because he was there witnessing the horrible acts some of the soldiers were forced to commit and the dangers of un-declared wars. Just maybe because he witnessed this first hand, his opinion means a bit more than yours. And by a bit, I mean your opinion means jack shit.
@philkrautter Now that I have answered to your non-sense, given my POV, and defended myself politely I think I can say happily. You may go back to your video games and I would advise you to keep out of the conversations of men. That is all.
@philkrautter Now, let's get to the point you made about his opinion being worth more than mine; I had the HONOUR of serving my country with PRIDE from 2001 to 2006 before I was medically discharged due to injury. I spent 16 month in my AOR in Iraq at a place called FOB War Eagle outside Sadr City. I was a Proud member of the US Army First Cavalry Division based out of Ft Hood Texas. When I let the military I obtained the rank of Sergeant E-5.
@philkrautter As for ‘undeclared war’? March 19th 2003 President Bush made an address to the nation declaring war in Iraq due to the atrocities committed by the Saddam Husain Regime and due to Iraq's failure to uphold UN resolution 687, allowing UN weapons inspectors access to the country to ensure that they have weapons not capable of violating the UN decreed weapon capabilities. Further proof you do not know what you're talking about.
@wolfwatcher25 You are clueless. Do you know what a declaration of war is?
A declaration of war is a formal act by which one nation goes to war against another. Go read up on the Hague Convention.
On march 19th President Bush did nothing, but state a war on terrorism. HE DID NOT DECLARE WAR ON A NATION. We have not declared war since 1941. Get a clue, anything past 1941 was a policing act.
@Afrothunderkat So for 12 years the US and the united nations tried to stop the war from happening, even after Congress passed UNANIMOUSLY the use of force in Iraq to bring then into compliance with UN Resolutions, the US tried for a further 13 months to bring about peace. Even Iran, Kuwait, and several other Neighbours of Iraq tried to help to the ends of Peace. An ultimatum was issued in the end, stand down or it would mean war. You're right, US did not declare war, we left that to Saddam.
@Afrothunderkat I have a full transcript of the speech given by President Bush if you would like to read it mate. As for the Hague Convention, both the 1899 and 1907 convention. You see, the first act, on maintenance of the General peace article 1 which states; With a view to obviating, as far as possible, recourse to force in the relations between States, the Signatory Powers agree to use their best efforts to insure the pacific settlement of international differences.
@philkrautter So that means that IF (and I'm not saying he did.) see something Horrible and illegal, and DIDN'T try his damnedest to stop it, then he was either WILLING to let them happen, or a coward for not stepping up and saying 'This is wrong'. The fact that he is an ex-soldier, against a war that hundreds of thousands fought honourably in, is disgusting and I can only thank God that he is no longer in the military because I would not have wanted someone like him watching my back.
@philkrautter Now these 'Horrible acts' that Adam 'MAY have' witnessed? Maybe he should have remembered that oath he took when he signed up. The one that states plainly in it, sworn under God to obey the LAWFUL orders of those officers placed above him in accordance with the regulations and the uniform code of military justice. Meaning if he WITNESSED a Horrible or Illegal act, he was REQUIRED BY LAW to stop those acts.
@philkrautter Alright, seeing as you decided to jump to Adam's defence without being asked I'll talk to you. Forgetting for a moment that you're either a child, my guess would be between 16 and 23 based solely on the content of your youtube account (or a pothead like most of Adam's fans) and the fact that the only combat experience you have is playing star craft two, Xbox, and world of war craft and know likely twice time the sum total of fuck all about anything. I'll still comment back.
@wolfwatcher25 First of all you're far from respectful with your petty jabs at Phil, resorting to calling into question his character (of which you know absolutely nothing about on any meaningful level) so while I can claim you're an antagonistic self righteous blowhard (a character trait made abundantly clear at the beginning of your tirade) you may just be having a bad day. Secondly, don't even bring up the oath of a military officer as you can't even grasp it enough to know
@SanctumOfTheWolf As an army soldier, the old saying of 'Ours is not to reason why' goes out the window. As for Phil, you're right; I called into question his character, which I had no right to do. And for that I apologise, and I will send Phil an apology as well, perhaps I was pissed off that he said my opinion was worth jack shit? Whatever gave me no right to say something like that. So Phil, here where all can read it I apologise.
@SanctumOfTheWolf The UCMJ states in it, that ANY SODLIER, who sees an act not consistent with the Geneva Convention, the Rules of Engagements, or rules based on COMMON Morality, is ordered to Intervene with the backing of being at that point considered ONE RANK above the highest ranking soldier taking part in the actions deemed to be against those regulations above. Now I plainly said that I did not know if Adam was made to see anything, but that IF he was, it was his duty to stop it.
@SanctumOfTheWolf As for the oath I brought up Sanctum, I didn't bring up the Oath of an Officer; I brought up the Oath of Enlistment, which every soldier, officer and non-commissioned officer both are required to give upon signing up. Which states “I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God'. Now, in accordance with the regulations and the UCMJ.
@SanctumOfTheWolf This action, while trying to remain peacefully as 12 year of diplomacy in Iraq shows, was the final step towards action in Iraq. THIS action was also unanimously voted for by Congress in 2002, which allowed force to be used in Iraq but still they tried peaceful means for another 13 months.
@SanctumOfTheWolf As you say, his First Amendment right gives him free speech to say what he likes, as it does me. And again, as for the war in Iraq, it's mincing words now. Bush gave the ultimatum speech to Iraq, giving Saddam the chance to stand down, to leave the country, if he didn't it would be met by force of the United States and allied militaries. That is called a formal declaration of Intent without declaring war. Saddam refused, which lead to war.
@SanctumOfTheWolf First of all sanctum, welcome to the conversation. Quite frankly I am honoured to speak with someone with a little respect, first of all, I never put myself above Adam, and I stated an opinion as I saw it. It was Phil that put Adam above me by saying my opinion, which is constitutionally protected if I am not mistaken, was worth nothing while Adam's was sent from on high. That is where I took offense.
@wolfwatcher25 that defending the constitution is in the first sentence and the war you support is in and of itself UNCONSTITUTIONAL. Where you ostracize him for taking a stand in this unjust war, I admire him for it. Where you are a willing pawn with clearly no grasp of the first amendment right HE SERVED TO UPHOLD AND THEREFORE DESERVES THE MERIT OF OBSERVING HIS FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT TO BE AGAINST THE WAR. Presidents do not declare war in a constitutional America, CONGRESS does
@wolfwatcher25 So the fact that Bush got up and declared war is null and moot. Moreso that he didn't even declare war on a country and instead went to war with an idea. That's like saying I'm going to war against sleepiness and so I'm going to go to Mattress Giant and destroy every bed. Just because you served "with pride" does not put you above Adam Kokesh, or any man for that matter. I would've been a Marine had Bush (and now Obama) thrown the constitution out the window. Tread
@wolfwatcher25 with caution my friend. You have the mentality of a soldier ant, never ask a question and hence never learn beyond what is dictated. A recipe for disaster if I ever saw one. Thank you for your service, I only hope this little hissy fit you had only reflects your civilian life and not the life you spent in the military on MY tax dollars.
@DaeguDave1 Really? RT might purport to be free from bias but it is biased. It's frequently criticised for being pro-Putin as well as avoiding coverage of stories damaging to Russia's image, being anti-European and anti-American. Don't mistake propaganda from another country as truth simply because you recognise the propaganda in your own country.
@TwoTube2 At least RT seems to give a crap about the USA. And, they care about the obvious SLIGHTS of Ron Paul in AMERICAN (s)election season. I mean, THEY talk about Paul, which I find refreshing- in ANY newz show.
@annebeck58 RT is generally anti-USA, hence why they'd care about showing "the obvious slights of Ron Paul", but avoid ever portraying the rather major flaws of Putin in Russia. They are also anti-European and anti-NATO. News should aspire to report only the facts, but RT's bias gets in the way, and because a lot of people have a bone to pick with America, they don't realise it's just another type of propaganda they're swallowing.
kokesh is an actor, ron paul is an actor. if someone is on a billionairs network they're an actor, which is all of them. don't chase the carrot dangling in front of your face. it's not reality
@l3urns1 A billionaire's network? Like Rupert Murdoch's Fox or Ted Turner's CNN? By that standard Obama and Romney are Jack Nicholson and Al Pacino! xD
Adam I've been following your play for two years now and as far as i am concerned you are an american hero brother so keep up the good work. As for the park police you guys are fucking loosers and you all need a jail cell along with that faggot judge that ordered no dancing. You cops are fucking over your own country for greedy corporate goofs. Be proud you fucking dummies. What happens to the cops when the american people take their country back. SOME BAD SHIT!!! good luck there little piggies.
Adam I've been following your play for two years now and as far as i am concerned you are an american hero brother so keep up the good work. As for the park police you guys are fucking loosers and you all need a jail cell along with that faggot judge that ordered no dancing. You cops are fucking over your own country for greedy corporate goofs. Be proud you fucking dummies. What happens to the cops when the american people take their country back. SOME BAD SHIT!!! good luck there little piggies.
Stay strong mr. Kokesh. All these people saying you were resisting arrest, I wonder how they'd feel if they got body slammed for some bullshit like that.
why didn't he answer the question..and it was the same cop? so why was that cop in two different forces...and why at the memorial, was the SGTs stripes on upside down? i believe in free speech and i agree with what adam is doing...but it would still be nice to have some questions answered.
Although I agree that the arrests were total BS - you were thrown down because you were resisting arrest - not because you were dancing. No he shouldn't have tried to arrest you in the first place but when he did you resisted.
Thank God i dont live in the US growing up I thought America was the greatest nation on earth.............what happened. Give the people back their freedom or they will take it back themselves. God Bless America
@Galisss3321 yeah america has gone downhill there was once a time where america was well respected....now we are pretty much the laughing stock of the rest of the world. and itl probably continue to get worse.
Adam Kokesh indeed is a fraud, he's a cheater all of this is just a simple masquerade working for deceiving people. Ron Paul for president and the the jail is waiting for you Adam second hand actor !
Hate on Dancing? Haters for asking questions? if people don't get answers then they may turn it to hate after a while who knows...but still, that's a LONG video excuse and still you never mentioned WHY he was doing 2 quite different jobs in the police... and you or him didn't recognise each other .lol
I don't know... Adam seems like a good kid... and just because the same asshole cop happened to be at both events doesn't really mean that this is a staged event. Both of these events took place in D.C.
Now if the cop had assaulted him at Mount Rushmore, then I might say you have a point, but... this is a little shallow.
Sometimes your videos are a bit extreme, but i thoroughly enjoy your message, I Appreciate the fact that you being a veteran are not afraid to speak out :)
this dude makes a complete ass of himself, he instigated the officer and resisted arrest, he got what he deserve, he is the one that is disrespecting the constitution not our law enforcement
@mccask13 im not saying that the law that was passed is justified, im just saying that he knew what he was doing was against the rules, if he is willing to break the law as a form of protesting it then he has to deal with the consiquences, he wasnt listening to the cop and when the cop tried to cuff him he resisted, the cops were doing their job and have to think about their safety, videos like this rapidly spread ignorance because people jump to conclisions, btw fuck u inconsiderate bastard
@stfuplzzzz Sorry. Hate to derail your Assumption Express but I and neither a cop nor am I black. also, while I'm not huge I've not received any complaints on my size.
You are, by analysis of your comment, a small-minded simpleton who is racist and has issues with authority as well as certain.....inferiority issues shall we say?
@RoboTwoine Good for you! You almost made a complete sentence! I'm so glad to see the electroshock therapy having a positive affect! Just 80 more sessions to go and soon you will be able to wipe your own ass!
Why are people trying to defame Adam and claim he is a fraud with foolish arguments like "jedi mind trick". Are you fucking serious? He's making jokes about it all. He is not a reporter so anyone who hates him for not saying much during this broadcast is fucking brainwashed. How many normal people would you want to see talk on tv on a regular basis. He's just another human being not some well groomed corporate cocksucker like the rest you all love to see on the news so much.
zcxvasdfqwer1234 3 days ago
He is a jedi too?
Pi55edOffMyNamesGone 4 days ago
this dude is an idiot ! I am glad RT fired his dumb ass
914light 5 days ago
@914light - wanker
ISISMainframe 1 day ago
I love seeing this douche bag getting his ass whooped !
hobo59 1 week ago
@hobo59 best grab your purse and pink dress cause you will never be the man
ISISMainframe 1 day ago
@ISISMainframe What's that Clem ? Did you say something or is that just more shit leaking from your brain ? LOL Fuck off pussy !
hobo59 1 day ago
I saw the strings
TheCosmicGypsies 1 week ago
ill give me more taxes so the glasses stay on for at least 3 body slams on unarmed civilians
SkyJunkieA62040 1 week ago
..this pieces of shit are agents provocateurs...they want to incite civil unrest as an excuse for martial law...how do i know? NORMAL PEOPLE SELDOM DANCE WITHOUT MUSIC ...those 'dancers' are undercover cops, agent provocateurs, trying to give the excuse for martial law.....in "part 2" (also available on youtube) they did bring some miserable "music" but i can assure you that this is sort of "music" that only cops and nuns could dance to...i seek pole shift survival group...
sexypoetry 1 week ago
he asked holder about ending the drug was to help lessen police casualties?why? fuck those pigs,he should have asked wouldnt save users and addicts lives,and stop crime,what about people on drug probation that are dying because they are forced into doing new synthetic leagal drugs/"research chemicals" drugs?which are more dangerous and dont show in a court ordered drug test
bulletproof2353 1 week ago
Adam got question cops came into my house without a search warrant and without my permission im pretty sure that isnt legal just seeing what i can do about this.
RsNoob1011 1 week ago
@RsNoob1011 Nothing. Just opening the door for them is enough. If they happen to smell or suspect illegal activity they can enter your home without a warrant. Some states they don't even need a warrant. The best bet is to call the cops out on site, it's hard after the fact.
arulius74 1 week ago
@arulius74 Must be exigent circumstances. Never open the door for police, if you have too, tell them you'll step outside. NEVER LET THEM IN.
401amproduction 1 week ago
"these are not the patriots your looking for"
WTFjustNEWS 2 weeks ago
@WTFjustNEWS "Let them Dance...."
AkanniRavenswood 2 weeks ago
@wolfwatcher25 the Police do not have a right to tell you stop a peaceful or non-violent protest. By dancing silently these people where doing just that. What e police did here was incredibly wrong and if you can't see that you my friend are an idiot.
@stillyross from what I read of your argument with wolfwatcher, I agree with you. Clearly wolfwatcher doesn't understand laws at all.
redace236 2 weeks ago
@redace236 No, they do not IF YOU GET THE right paperwork filled out. it's simple, and before you start about me needing to learn the Law, in 2004 I passed the MBE in Louisianna. I think I know slightly more about the United States Penal Code then yourself. And I know the law on peaceful gathering. As the dancing was a CELEBRATION stated by Adam (who is a douch I think) then he needed to fill out the proper forms for it with the city office. Failure to do so means the police where in the right.
wolfwatcher25 4 days ago
LOL Adam Kokesh is a hell of a funny guy. I enjoy his sense of humor.
LibertyInProgressNOW 2 weeks ago
hey by chance is your dad charlie kokesh
SurvivingTheWild101 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
SurvivingTheWild101 2 weeks ago
If you're apart of the government you're part of the problem
freeadixxx 3 weeks ago
@freeadixxx ignorant.
wolfwatcher25 2 weeks ago
u the man bro....keep on resisting!
hspannu777 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"The Jefferson Memorial is not a Go Go Bar to dance you Bitches!"
and to the all mother fucking protesters "you are the people who destroy the freedom and rights"
"you are the one setting all this up and leaving United States as bad country"
"its shame for you to say that your an American citizen" learn to respect The Memorial and The Country.
God Bless America!
TheSuperComments 3 weeks ago
LANDED ON A CUSHION OF FORCE AIR? BUHAHAHA!!!! GET A LIFE MOTHER FUCKER!! YOUR SUCH A PUSSY!!!.
TheSuperComments 3 weeks ago
YES BITCH YOU SET THIS UP!
TheSuperComments 3 weeks ago
You're such and ass Adam. You didnt cooperate with the cop, you get what you deserve. I'm for freedom of people and expression, but dancing at a memorial is showing disrespect in a place of sacred honor. You disobey the warning, they give you the cuffs. end of story
RANDOMFREAKSHOWCO 3 weeks ago
@RANDOMFREAKSHOWCO
The cop gave no indication of what he was going to do verbally and the physical groping didn't help any.
Free expression is banned in a monument of a champion of freedom of speech. Take note that it is not private property. Is this not unconstitutional?
If you do not submit to authority or if you dare to question, you deserve being body slammed into a marble floor.
Recite with me now:
War is peace
Freedom is slavery
Ignorance is strength
Sight099 3 weeks ago
@Sight099 this comment deserves infinity thumbs up xD nicejob
xSkateOrPlayGuitarx 3 weeks ago
@RANDOMFREAKSHOWCO Wait a minute, you're for the 'freedom of people' and their right to express themselves, but when someone behaves 'disrespectful' in the regards of a controversial manner while remaining peaceful you believe an officer of the law has the right to detain you despite no law having been violated.
Wasn't the first amendment created to protect those of us who do go against the public-quo? How can you say you are for the freedoms of the people if you believe so?
iRyaan 3 weeks ago
A shame on u american media, CNN, FOX and others u r completely corrupted so u force guys like Adam to go and work for Russian TV to provide real his point of view. Look at u! Soviet Russia was your enemy number one for very long time and look... this is only media u can actually watch in US. Total shame on u! Yes, they made some space for Ron Paul, but all they do is to make him a todays Howard Beale (Network movie) the articulator (jester) of the public anger and truth, but they dont care...
hromi 3 weeks ago
Yeah. First? I saw Medea and her "friend" there (which I WAS happy to see, since I am a member of Code-Pink Austin). .and then? I read the DUMBASS comments. (Man, I have not been cursing on YT, for quite some time, ,but this ticks me off). The ridiculous take-down (of too many folk, for "dancing:) was enough to bother me, but then the asinine commentary about YOU> I don;t even know what to say about these fools..calling you "CIA", "Covert Ops?, blah blah- almost funny, but too stupid- them
annebeck58 4 weeks ago
I noticed that cop too but i never thought Adam was a fraud. I took it as being the cop having some sort of a vendetta against him. If people really thought this was some sort of a joke or fraud, they really need to open their eyes.
trippplefive 4 weeks ago
you are a filthy hippie and you got what you deserved!!!!! filthy hippie!!
MegaFatpants 1 month ago
And the name of the officer is... Mr. Same Name and the false flag Kokesh brigade.
Blues353 1 month ago
How do you piss off a Liberal...why with facts of course.
wolfwatcher25 1 month ago
Adam bro, its "the internets" not the interwebs. Thats a meme from GWB.
=LKTH6f1JfX8
ragnarthelibrarian 1 month ago
Now, I will say this. Adam, you desevered getting slammed as you were resisting arrest. In accordance with the law which states; physically struggling to get out from being restrained (handcuffed or put into the police vehicle). Now you are a big guy, I'm 6'3" and 210lbs, and I wouldn't have wanted to wrestle with you either, I'd have put you down just as hard. Sorry Adam, but I believe you were wrong and got what you deserved.
wolfwatcher25 1 month ago
@wolfwatcher25 The law also states that you have the right to resist unlawful arrest. BAM Knowlodge Bomb.
stillyross 1 month ago
@stillyross By resist Unlawful arrest it means that you can contest it in a court of law. I could direct you to the proper case file if you wanted. Unfortunately being asked to stop dancing falls under the reasonable request by a law enforcement officer clause. That he didn't, was unlawful. Of course if he filed a proper form with the city asking premission for a peaceful demonstration then it wouldn't have been a problem either. Knowledge Bomb denied.
wolfwatcher25 1 month ago
@wolfwatcher25 “Citizens may resist unlawful arrest to the point of taking an arresting officer's life if necessary.” Plummer v. State, 136 Ind. 306. This premise was upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case: John Bad Elk v. U.S., 177 U.S. 529
stillyross 1 month ago
@stillyross One feels it is also notable that the first case file you mentioned Plummer v. State, was a court case from the 1800's and was decided by the Indiana Supreme Court not the US Supreme Court. John Bad Elf V. U.S. was upheld by the US Supreme Court...in the year 1900. But I like were you were going. If you read the cases transcript available in a law text book, you will see that you are wrong; they do NOT support resisting arrest unless your life is in direct danger.
wolfwatcher25 1 month ago
@stillyross In most of these cases resisting was legal due to the officer not giving notice that they were indeed a police officer or do to the belief that the person being arrested was in direct danger of police brutality. Going to Constitution(dot)org, where all these cases are listed means nothing. The failure to comply with the lawful orders of a police office is grounds for arrest, to fight a police officer after that is resisting LAWFUL arrest and subject to fines and jail time
wolfwatcher25 1 month ago
@wolfwatcher25 One could also mention, upon further reading of the case file available in the book that Plummer V. State, Plummer was fired at by the officer without the officer giving identification that he was a Policeman. Which has NOTHING to do with arrest and was a case of Self defense.
wolfwatcher25 1 month ago
@stillyross direct quote from John Bad Elk V. US reads in the verdict as follows "It is the law that a person illegally arrested by an officer may resist that arrest, even to the extent of the taking of life if his own life or any great bodily harm is threatened." DIRECT QUOTE
wolfwatcher25 1 month ago
@stillyross Now those are Knowledge Bombs!
wolfwatcher25 1 month ago
@wolfwatcher25 In the end the case was dropped as soon as they came before a judge by the state. That tells me that those officers had no leg to stand on. Also no victom no crime. They were arrested for civil disobediance ( Definition - The refusal to comply with certain laws or to pay taxes and fines, as a peaceful form of political protest) and they were not protesting.
stillyross 1 month ago
@stillyross My guess would be that the case was dropped because more than one hundred people decended on the Jefferson Memorial in response to Liberal Media making the police into Monsters. And I have seen most of the videos of this Farce online yes. Enough to know that Adam DIDN'T try to help anyone, he just danced. It was when he was being arrested for Failure to Obey the LAWFUL ORDERS OF THE POLICE when he resisted arrest that he was put on the ground and arrested.
wolfwatcher25 1 month ago
@wolfwatcher25 Well to make the loop back to your original comment I responded to "he got what he deserved". It's sad that anyone would believe that. I am in the understanding that you served in the army, as I do now. I fight for freedoms as you did too, and to be honest I don't see whats wrong with anyone doing something silly in a public place. But when someone can lawfully stop someone from expressing themselves I see that as the begining of the end to our freedoms. Who was he hurting?
stillyross 1 month ago
@stillyross I will admit that the throat grab was over the top and the officer should be cautioned for it, but the slam was acceptable. I was a memeber if the army yes, what Unit Are you In? And it has nothing to do with dancing, or if the police man was right in asking them to stop. It was a lawful order for them to do so and the police man had every right to ask it from them. If they had a problem, they could have put in a complaint, they SHOULD NOT have continued to dance.
wolfwatcher25 1 month ago
@wolfwatcher25 If it's not illegal, I see no reason why the "have" to stop just because the say it's a lawfull order. While yes it would be the curtious thing to do, but the officer really had no grounds to do so. They really didn't hurt anyone, thats the point. I myself tend to be very firm on my grounds when dealing with officers of the law, we need to be in order to ensure they are doing their job and not bouncing around on power trips. Also I won't post a unit on here, but I work in NATO.
stillyross 3 weeks ago
@stillyross I'm not sure why I am still arguing with this. They HAVE to stop because it was a REASONABLE and LAWFUL order of the Police. If the police say stop, you stop. To do otherwise is looking for trouble. You have the RIGHT to ask why you have to stop, take the police officers answer and lodge a complaint, but you do NOT have the right to disobey that LAWFUL and REASONABLE order. Oh and Because I said so, is not a valid reason from the police and if they say that, it'll go bad for them.
wolfwatcher25 2 weeks ago
@wolfwatcher25 It's funny you say that, because through out the arrest video not one of those officers could state the law they were detaining them under. When asked I believe the reply was " we will get that for you in a little bit." which says 1 of 2 things, he doesn't know the laws he's vowed to uphold or he is in the wrong and needs to refer to the book to find a loophole to detain them anyways. If I'm being detained and the officer can't state why I would resist too.
stillyross 2 weeks ago
@stillyross What it says to me is that the officers were BUSY DOING THEIR JOBS. If they answered every question when asked it would have taken longer. We do not know by this video shot probably by someone on Adam's payroll what was said. It would be that once all the arrests were done the questions were all answered. We don't know. And you would have been breaking the law in that resisting.
wolfwatcher25 2 weeks ago
@stillyross Now Stillyross, I have been trying to make you understand the law, I have been trying to make you understand the rights, all of which we both agree on in principle. But you appear to live in a fantasy world were you can do whatever the hell you want and get away with it. If you resist a lawful order, you are breaking the law, if you resist arrest, the officer has the right to put you on the ground and cuff you. it's that simple. Adam broke the law. He got arrested. End.
wolfwatcher25 2 weeks ago
@wolfwatcher25 you sir are by far stupidwith what you're saying is that also ANYONE who participates in a Flash Mob should be ARRESTED for hosting a flash mob that sounds reasonable..... police break the law more than an average citizen.
RsNoob1011 1 week ago
@RsNoob1011 Hello RsNoob, I am not exactly sure how you came to that conclusion from what I have said my friend. I NEVER said that people hosting a flash mob should be arrested. Hell, I've been in a flash mob against some rights being violated in Detroit. What I said was that Adam broke the law by not obeying the orders of a police officer and they were right to arrest him. He resisted arrest and they had the right to put him down and take him away. That is all. :)
wolfwatcher25 1 week ago
@wolfwatcher25 actually just because you don't do what a police officer tells you, that doesn't equate the breaking of a law. If that were the case, they could request anything and arrest anyone for non obedience. Learn the law, and protect your rights.
SinceretheGhost 1 week ago
@SinceretheGhost I refuse to explaine the difference between A lawful and non-lawful order or reseasonable request again to this board. It's getting tiresome now. A reasonable request can be ignored. Ignoring a lawful order is a violation. Read all my comments please before you comment to me please as I have already explained this once before.
wolfwatcher25 4 days ago
@wolfwatcher25 I don't need you to explain the difference, and since you didn't specify in the post that I read I'm not going to go back and read all your old posts because well..I have a life, and don't care enough to do so. So like I said before, you do not have to listen to everything a cop says, which is obviously the case- there being a difference between lawful and unlawful requests. I don't care how many times you explained it, holds no bearing on what I was responding to.
SinceretheGhost 3 days ago
@wolfwatcher25 and you are wrong, No law was broken only thing that was broken was the rights of the people , therefore no reason for an arrest to be made, if an officer told you to run across a busy road with your eyes closed and you did not obey the order would he be breaking the law ? NO !! WAKE up and go to us.gov and learn the law !!! Also if a bill is passed that is against the Constitution it is Unconstitutional Law and not enforcable !!!
Gene4God 5 days ago
@Gene4God there is actually an old obscure law that forbids dancing at a national monument. The main reason it was drafted was to prevent people from dancing on war memorials like the Tomb of The Unknowns.
Hoover1128 4 days ago
@stillyross That is called SPOILING for a reaction, but then I would expect nothing less from the Liberal Media, which I put Adam in, than to try something like that. He and the rest were spoiling for a reaction or a fight. You'd have to be blind to see that they weren't.
wolfwatcher25 1 month ago
@wolfwatcher25 I am not saying the were not, but it shows how screwed up or country is gettin. Someone who wants to dance in public place is harming no one. They should have never had to bring a situation like this to the public. You and I should never had to debate wether he is the right or wrong. That is how silly and irrelavent his actions were. Yet here we are, look at the whole picture, regaurdless of resisting arrest, do you think it was right that they approched him in such a manner.
stillyross 1 month ago
@stillyross It is harming. It's harming/disruptive to the people who are there and are br respectful to the monument. Adam and the others there are nothing more than trouble seeking miscreants that have nothing better to do then to harass police. I'm sick of Youtube videos of people videotaping and harassing police who are trying to do their jobs. If you harass a cop things WILL get escalated and out of control, and yay, you got a cop with a family, in trouble. Nice job, ass.
SonicLamb 3 weeks ago
@SonicLamb What I find sad is most police officers do not know their job or the laws they swear to uphold, further more the ones who consider themselves "above" the citizens they are there to protect. I don't see how you can speak for those who were at the momument the day of this incedent, it's not like they ran around punching people in the face. What if young child decided he wanted to dance at the memorial, should that police officer tell them they can't dance? It's irrelevent and harmless.
stillyross 3 weeks ago
@stillyross Why are you comparing a child who doesn't know the law against a miscreant who does and decides to break it. A LAW was passed and Adam and his hooligan gang BROKE A LAW. I don't care how stupid you think it is, breaking a law is breaking a law. Cops arrest people who break a law...why is that so difficult to understand?
SonicLamb 3 weeks ago
@SonicLamb - So tomorrow if they pass a new law that makes something that was legal, illegal,no matter how crazy this new law is, you wouldnt have a problem with the police enforcing it? If they made... singing in your car illegal you wouldnt have any problems with the police "just doing their jobs" ?........ I would. I would have a big problem with it
CplPrimeaux 3 weeks ago
@CplPrimeaux No, I wouldn't. Enforcing laws is part of a police officers job. You having a problem with it makes me thing you are an anarchist will go out of his way to cause problems when there should be no problem. I don't care if you hate cops. I'm not fond of them myself, but if one told me to do something, I would do it because I don't want to be tazed/peppersprayed/beaten to a pulp. Why would anyone WANT that?
SonicLamb 3 weeks ago
@SonicLamb (continue) Being a cop is a tough job, because of assholes like you going out of their way to cause problems. To qoute what I said earlier..."I'm sick of Youtube videos of people videotaping and harassing police who are trying to do their jobs. If you harass a cop things WILL get escalated and out of control, and yay, you got a cop with a family, in trouble. Nice job, ass."
SonicLamb 3 weeks ago
@SonicLamb Conform, conform, conform.Sounds like someone who is scared to stand up for their rights. So what if a law was passed thit is an infingement of your rights, say like the Patriot Act or the NDAA, should we just do what we are told and not form a rukus. Who needs rights or individual thought when we can just let the government do it for us. I feel sorry for you, for the simple fact that you have given up freedom.
stillyross 2 weeks ago
@SonicLamb Also I forgot to ad, I myself as soldier, willing to lay down MY life for YOUR rights and your worried about pepper spray or a beating that you would survive to stand up for your own rights. That is just plain said and as far as I'm concerned you are pissing all over every soldier for the simple fact that my brothers and sisters in arms would be willing to do the same and you refuse to use what they are willing to die for. Some citizen you are.
stillyross 2 weeks ago
@SonicLamb You now hold a double standard, you don't have to know a law to break it. And as you stated "breaking a law is breaking a law." It does not matter if you know it's a law your still held to it. So are you saying that children are not held to tha law and should be able to do as they please?
stillyross 3 weeks ago
@stillyross What right are you protecting from me? The right to act like an jackass micreant? I don't want to do that because I am respectful to others. Causing trouble is what normal people do. Please re-join us...it's not too late to be a memeber of society again.
SonicLamb 2 weeks ago
@SonicLamb 1. I would much rather remain a soldier then to conform to what you think is an acceptiable socity. 2. You never answered my question, Should everyone be held to the law or are those who don't know the law exempt?
stillyross 2 weeks ago
@wolfwatcher25 “Each person has the right to resist an unlawful arrest. In such a case, the person attempting the arrest stands in the position of a wrongdoer and may be resisted by the use of force, as in self- defense.” (State v. Mobley, 240 N.C. 476, 83 S.E. 2d 100).
stillyross 1 month ago
@stillyross State V. Mobley, 1954 Mobley was arrested for Drunkeness, there was no law in the state against drunkeness at the time, therefore the arrest was Illegal. the Officers orders were UNLAWFUL.
wolfwatcher25 1 month ago
@wolfwatcher25 “One may come to the aid of another being unlawfully arrested, just as he may where one is being assaulted, molested, raped or kidnapped. Thus it is not an offense to liberate one from the unlawful custody of an officer, even though he may have submitted to such custody, without resistance.” (Adams v. State, 121 Ga. 16, 48 S.E. 910).
stillyross 1 month ago
@stillyross Adams V. State pretains to helping someone being Illegally arrested and in danger of brutaility by the arresting officer. it's also a case from 1904.
wolfwatcher25 1 month ago
@wolfwatcher25 I threw that one in there because one of his buddies tried to block the arrest when it went to the ground. Also is body slaming and choking a citizen not brutality. Also just to make sure we are on the same page, you have seen the original arrest video?
stillyross 1 month ago
@wolfwatcher25 If someone was putting you in an oven and it was the law that said you couldnt resist, would you resist? Now lets take that a lil less extreme, lets say a law enforcement officer told you not to kiss your girlfriend in public, would you accept such an order? Im 6'2" and 165 lbs, so im not a big guy, but I dont like feeling pain, so anyone who tries to "detain" me will have to work for it.
Jononutoob 3 weeks ago
I can't believe they give this guy time on TV
hangontome 1 month ago
"Free speech is meant to protect unpopular speech. Popular speech, by definition, needs no protection." - Neal Boortz
Popular speech is also often mindless rhetoric of an enslaved people; who in thinking themselves to be engaging in independent thought, merely echo that which the master has ingrained into their subconscious and only allows them to voice.
And given the breadth of stupidity that enables govt, it would be apt to say "We the puppets"; as opposed to, "We the people."
CriticalTh1nker 1 month ago
I don''t want to do the robot lol
TheUnitedNewsNetwork 1 month ago
Iraq Veterens Against The War? What a joke. Adam.
wolfwatcher25 1 month ago
@wolfwatcher25 Maybe because he was there witnessing the horrible acts some of the soldiers were forced to commit and the dangers of un-declared wars. Just maybe because he witnessed this first hand, his opinion means a bit more than yours. And by a bit, I mean your opinion means jack shit.
philkrautter 1 month ago
@philkrautter Now that I have answered to your non-sense, given my POV, and defended myself politely I think I can say happily. You may go back to your video games and I would advise you to keep out of the conversations of men. That is all.
wolfwatcher25 1 month ago
@philkrautter Now, let's get to the point you made about his opinion being worth more than mine; I had the HONOUR of serving my country with PRIDE from 2001 to 2006 before I was medically discharged due to injury. I spent 16 month in my AOR in Iraq at a place called FOB War Eagle outside Sadr City. I was a Proud member of the US Army First Cavalry Division based out of Ft Hood Texas. When I let the military I obtained the rank of Sergeant E-5.
wolfwatcher25 1 month ago
@philkrautter As for ‘undeclared war’? March 19th 2003 President Bush made an address to the nation declaring war in Iraq due to the atrocities committed by the Saddam Husain Regime and due to Iraq's failure to uphold UN resolution 687, allowing UN weapons inspectors access to the country to ensure that they have weapons not capable of violating the UN decreed weapon capabilities. Further proof you do not know what you're talking about.
wolfwatcher25 1 month ago
@wolfwatcher25 You are clueless. Do you know what a declaration of war is?
A declaration of war is a formal act by which one nation goes to war against another. Go read up on the Hague Convention.
On march 19th President Bush did nothing, but state a war on terrorism. HE DID NOT DECLARE WAR ON A NATION. We have not declared war since 1941. Get a clue, anything past 1941 was a policing act.
Afrothunderkat 1 month ago
@Afrothunderkat So for 12 years the US and the united nations tried to stop the war from happening, even after Congress passed UNANIMOUSLY the use of force in Iraq to bring then into compliance with UN Resolutions, the US tried for a further 13 months to bring about peace. Even Iran, Kuwait, and several other Neighbours of Iraq tried to help to the ends of Peace. An ultimatum was issued in the end, stand down or it would mean war. You're right, US did not declare war, we left that to Saddam.
wolfwatcher25 1 month ago
@Afrothunderkat I have a full transcript of the speech given by President Bush if you would like to read it mate. As for the Hague Convention, both the 1899 and 1907 convention. You see, the first act, on maintenance of the General peace article 1 which states; With a view to obviating, as far as possible, recourse to force in the relations between States, the Signatory Powers agree to use their best efforts to insure the pacific settlement of international differences.
wolfwatcher25 1 month ago
@philkrautter So that means that IF (and I'm not saying he did.) see something Horrible and illegal, and DIDN'T try his damnedest to stop it, then he was either WILLING to let them happen, or a coward for not stepping up and saying 'This is wrong'. The fact that he is an ex-soldier, against a war that hundreds of thousands fought honourably in, is disgusting and I can only thank God that he is no longer in the military because I would not have wanted someone like him watching my back.
wolfwatcher25 1 month ago
@philkrautter Now these 'Horrible acts' that Adam 'MAY have' witnessed? Maybe he should have remembered that oath he took when he signed up. The one that states plainly in it, sworn under God to obey the LAWFUL orders of those officers placed above him in accordance with the regulations and the uniform code of military justice. Meaning if he WITNESSED a Horrible or Illegal act, he was REQUIRED BY LAW to stop those acts.
wolfwatcher25 1 month ago
@philkrautter Alright, seeing as you decided to jump to Adam's defence without being asked I'll talk to you. Forgetting for a moment that you're either a child, my guess would be between 16 and 23 based solely on the content of your youtube account (or a pothead like most of Adam's fans) and the fact that the only combat experience you have is playing star craft two, Xbox, and world of war craft and know likely twice time the sum total of fuck all about anything. I'll still comment back.
wolfwatcher25 1 month ago
@wolfwatcher25 First of all you're far from respectful with your petty jabs at Phil, resorting to calling into question his character (of which you know absolutely nothing about on any meaningful level) so while I can claim you're an antagonistic self righteous blowhard (a character trait made abundantly clear at the beginning of your tirade) you may just be having a bad day. Secondly, don't even bring up the oath of a military officer as you can't even grasp it enough to know
SanctumOfTheWolf 1 month ago
@SanctumOfTheWolf As an army soldier, the old saying of 'Ours is not to reason why' goes out the window. As for Phil, you're right; I called into question his character, which I had no right to do. And for that I apologise, and I will send Phil an apology as well, perhaps I was pissed off that he said my opinion was worth jack shit? Whatever gave me no right to say something like that. So Phil, here where all can read it I apologise.
wolfwatcher25 1 month ago
@SanctumOfTheWolf The UCMJ states in it, that ANY SODLIER, who sees an act not consistent with the Geneva Convention, the Rules of Engagements, or rules based on COMMON Morality, is ordered to Intervene with the backing of being at that point considered ONE RANK above the highest ranking soldier taking part in the actions deemed to be against those regulations above. Now I plainly said that I did not know if Adam was made to see anything, but that IF he was, it was his duty to stop it.
wolfwatcher25 1 month ago
@SanctumOfTheWolf As for the oath I brought up Sanctum, I didn't bring up the Oath of an Officer; I brought up the Oath of Enlistment, which every soldier, officer and non-commissioned officer both are required to give upon signing up. Which states “I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God'. Now, in accordance with the regulations and the UCMJ.
wolfwatcher25 1 month ago
@SanctumOfTheWolf This action, while trying to remain peacefully as 12 year of diplomacy in Iraq shows, was the final step towards action in Iraq. THIS action was also unanimously voted for by Congress in 2002, which allowed force to be used in Iraq but still they tried peaceful means for another 13 months.
wolfwatcher25 1 month ago
@SanctumOfTheWolf As you say, his First Amendment right gives him free speech to say what he likes, as it does me. And again, as for the war in Iraq, it's mincing words now. Bush gave the ultimatum speech to Iraq, giving Saddam the chance to stand down, to leave the country, if he didn't it would be met by force of the United States and allied militaries. That is called a formal declaration of Intent without declaring war. Saddam refused, which lead to war.
wolfwatcher25 1 month ago
@SanctumOfTheWolf First of all sanctum, welcome to the conversation. Quite frankly I am honoured to speak with someone with a little respect, first of all, I never put myself above Adam, and I stated an opinion as I saw it. It was Phil that put Adam above me by saying my opinion, which is constitutionally protected if I am not mistaken, was worth nothing while Adam's was sent from on high. That is where I took offense.
wolfwatcher25 1 month ago
@wolfwatcher25 that defending the constitution is in the first sentence and the war you support is in and of itself UNCONSTITUTIONAL. Where you ostracize him for taking a stand in this unjust war, I admire him for it. Where you are a willing pawn with clearly no grasp of the first amendment right HE SERVED TO UPHOLD AND THEREFORE DESERVES THE MERIT OF OBSERVING HIS FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT TO BE AGAINST THE WAR. Presidents do not declare war in a constitutional America, CONGRESS does
SanctumOfTheWolf 1 month ago
@wolfwatcher25 So the fact that Bush got up and declared war is null and moot. Moreso that he didn't even declare war on a country and instead went to war with an idea. That's like saying I'm going to war against sleepiness and so I'm going to go to Mattress Giant and destroy every bed. Just because you served "with pride" does not put you above Adam Kokesh, or any man for that matter. I would've been a Marine had Bush (and now Obama) thrown the constitution out the window. Tread
SanctumOfTheWolf 1 month ago
@wolfwatcher25 with caution my friend. You have the mentality of a soldier ant, never ask a question and hence never learn beyond what is dictated. A recipe for disaster if I ever saw one. Thank you for your service, I only hope this little hissy fit you had only reflects your civilian life and not the life you spent in the military on MY tax dollars.
SanctumOfTheWolf 1 month ago
Welcome to Nazi America........... SHEEP.
someloser123 1 month ago
Your defense effort was too polished. Your a plant kokesh. a trained man.
AdstarAPAD 1 month ago
Adam Kokesh for President!
DaeguDave1 1 month ago
Russia Today is the best news network on American TV
DaeguDave1 1 month ago 17
@DaeguDave1 How ironic.
xXBeanDelphikiXx 1 month ago
@DaeguDave1 Really? RT might purport to be free from bias but it is biased. It's frequently criticised for being pro-Putin as well as avoiding coverage of stories damaging to Russia's image, being anti-European and anti-American. Don't mistake propaganda from another country as truth simply because you recognise the propaganda in your own country.
TwoTube2 1 month ago
@TwoTube2 At least RT seems to give a crap about the USA. And, they care about the obvious SLIGHTS of Ron Paul in AMERICAN (s)election season. I mean, THEY talk about Paul, which I find refreshing- in ANY newz show.
annebeck58 4 weeks ago
@annebeck58 RT is generally anti-USA, hence why they'd care about showing "the obvious slights of Ron Paul", but avoid ever portraying the rather major flaws of Putin in Russia. They are also anti-European and anti-NATO. News should aspire to report only the facts, but RT's bias gets in the way, and because a lot of people have a bone to pick with America, they don't realise it's just another type of propaganda they're swallowing.
TwoTube2 4 weeks ago
@DaeguDave1 RT is nothing but propaganda.
termase 3 weeks ago 2
@termase So too is CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC and don't forget FOX Entertainment News
adijcbs1 3 weeks ago 2
kokesh is an actor, ron paul is an actor. if someone is on a billionairs network they're an actor, which is all of them. don't chase the carrot dangling in front of your face. it's not reality
l3urns1 1 month ago
@l3urns1 A billionaire's network? Like Rupert Murdoch's Fox or Ted Turner's CNN? By that standard Obama and Romney are Jack Nicholson and Al Pacino! xD
Nyah420 1 month ago
russia today is trying to destroy america
BLAKESTONED 1 month ago
it just feels wrong or funny watching Russia Today network
lokalllize 1 month ago
Wish the cops would have not let you out. RON PAUL 2012
hankinskyle 1 month ago
Adam Kokesh is a turd. RON PAUL 2012
hankinskyle 1 month ago
Adam I've been following your play for two years now and as far as i am concerned you are an american hero brother so keep up the good work. As for the park police you guys are fucking loosers and you all need a jail cell along with that faggot judge that ordered no dancing. You cops are fucking over your own country for greedy corporate goofs. Be proud you fucking dummies. What happens to the cops when the american people take their country back. SOME BAD SHIT!!! good luck there little piggies.
TheDansutoob 1 month ago
Adam I've been following your play for two years now and as far as i am concerned you are an american hero brother so keep up the good work. As for the park police you guys are fucking loosers and you all need a jail cell along with that faggot judge that ordered no dancing. You cops are fucking over your own country for greedy corporate goofs. Be proud you fucking dummies. What happens to the cops when the american people take their country back. SOME BAD SHIT!!! good luck there little piggies.
TheDansutoob 1 month ago
Stay strong mr. Kokesh. All these people saying you were resisting arrest, I wonder how they'd feel if they got body slammed for some bullshit like that.
Jack102589 1 month ago
@Jack102589 Your fucking with the wrong Marines.
megaohmz 1 month ago
@Jack102589 Sorry not you, I meant that for KamekoBruns. I have a fat finger today!
megaohmz 1 month ago
dick
GioDante 1 month ago
you were resisting dumb ass what did you think was gonna happen
cnlfletch 1 month ago
He's a gay dancer...
Travis1955 1 month ago
Kokesh you would make a good cop. Why don't you become one.
glomomovnlo 1 month ago
why didn't he answer the question..and it was the same cop? so why was that cop in two different forces...and why at the memorial, was the SGTs stripes on upside down? i believe in free speech and i agree with what adam is doing...but it would still be nice to have some questions answered.
Arkansasmntkid 1 month ago
Although I agree that the arrests were total BS - you were thrown down because you were resisting arrest - not because you were dancing. No he shouldn't have tried to arrest you in the first place but when he did you resisted.
ps - I would have danced too if I was there ;)
kaelnyria 1 month ago
Traitor trash.
malagaent 1 month ago
stfu and come to australia
dooshbag47 1 month ago
Thank God i dont live in the US growing up I thought America was the greatest nation on earth.............what happened. Give the people back their freedom or they will take it back themselves. God Bless America
Galisss3321 2 months ago 29
@Galisss3321 god bless you.. From: An American. :)
edwinr360 1 month ago
@Galisss3321 yeah america has gone downhill there was once a time where america was well respected....now we are pretty much the laughing stock of the rest of the world. and itl probably continue to get worse.
MrNintendoAll 1 month ago 12
@Galisss3321 where do you live now? I wanna go there! haha
iwatchRonPaulvideos 1 month ago
Adam Kokesh indeed is a fraud, he's a cheater all of this is just a simple masquerade working for deceiving people. Ron Paul for president and the the jail is waiting for you Adam second hand actor !
JordskaIv 2 months ago
Hate on Dancing? Haters for asking questions? if people don't get answers then they may turn it to hate after a while who knows...but still, that's a LONG video excuse and still you never mentioned WHY he was doing 2 quite different jobs in the police... and you or him didn't recognise each other .lol
UKBLIVE 2 months ago
Jedi Schemdi.
I want to see a Jed Trick.
You know, like on the Beverly Hillbillies.
You're a fraud like having your epidermis showing is a bad thing.
americanbandwidth 2 months ago
i knew it was a setup. the air cushion, officers shaved legs, the russians, everything was planned.
pierrele 2 months ago
Is this guy really a fraud? He didn't answer the question.
11hani11 2 months ago
@11hani11 Yes he did, watch @ 1:55 - of course he was being sarcastic though.
1775novten 2 months ago
Keep it up Kokesh!
wish more people had your courage
mkultraxx 2 months ago
vote ron paul to secure your freedom
nabil113 2 months ago 14
what revolution? what planet this guy came from?
jeanrw2000 2 months ago
I don't know... Adam seems like a good kid... and just because the same asshole cop happened to be at both events doesn't really mean that this is a staged event. Both of these events took place in D.C.
Now if the cop had assaulted him at Mount Rushmore, then I might say you have a point, but... this is a little shallow.
melbyRick 2 months ago
I know what your trying to do........ Keep trying.
DarinmorganRMRE 2 months ago
Sometimes your videos are a bit extreme, but i thoroughly enjoy your message, I Appreciate the fact that you being a veteran are not afraid to speak out :)
Keep it up, keep spreading the good word. Peace
dajohnman1234 2 months ago
this dude makes a complete ass of himself, he instigated the officer and resisted arrest, he got what he deserve, he is the one that is disrespecting the constitution not our law enforcement
rblank90 2 months ago
@rblank90 Everyone knows the founders hated dancing.
jimmi161 2 months ago
@rblank90 - Son, looking at your profile, you appear a bit young to make such judgments. Come back to the Internet once you can shave.
mccask13 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mccask13 im not saying that the law that was passed is justified, im just saying that he knew what he was doing was against the rules, if he is willing to break the law as a form of protesting it then he has to deal with the consiquences, he wasnt listening to the cop and when the cop tried to cuff him he resisted, the cops were doing their job and have to think about their safety, videos like this rapidly spread ignorance because people jump to conclisions, btw fuck u inconsiderate bastard
rblank90 2 months ago
What's up with all these faggot cops here on the comments section..
xXxDarkAdeptusxXx 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I have never come across anyone as in love with the sound of their own voice as this cockbag.
KamekoBruns 2 months ago 5
@KamekoBruns lol ur a mad cop have fun jacking ur tiny dick off alone niglet
stfuplzzzz 2 months ago
@stfuplzzzz Sorry. Hate to derail your Assumption Express but I and neither a cop nor am I black. also, while I'm not huge I've not received any complaints on my size.
You are, by analysis of your comment, a small-minded simpleton who is racist and has issues with authority as well as certain.....inferiority issues shall we say?
KamekoBruns 1 month ago
@KamekoBruns lol cockbag
RoboTwoine 1 month ago
@RoboTwoine Good for you! You almost made a complete sentence! I'm so glad to see the electroshock therapy having a positive affect! Just 80 more sessions to go and soon you will be able to wipe your own ass!
KamekoBruns 1 month ago
@KamekoBruns holy crap. i thought what you said was funny. i'm not calling you a cockbag. christ.
RoboTwoine 1 month ago
@RoboTwoine Ah. Well then....sorry.
KamekoBruns 1 month ago
@KamekoBruns He's a typical jew.
crackahcrackah 1 month ago