~Republican$ are always saying that they hate"Big Government". What they really mean is that they hate government regulation.^Keep in mind that Republican$ don't work for you.They only work for BILLIONARES,CORPORATIONS& WALL STREET. They want to destroy MEDICARE because then they can give that money to the insurance co's. They want to destroy social security so they can give that money to Wall Street firms. They want to destroy UNIONS so that everybody makes minimum wage(like in Texas).
Reagan tripled the debt ... in 1980's dollars - 1.7 T$ (8 years) 212 B/yr.
-
After his failed attempt at giving a 25% tax reduction for everybody 1981 - 16 month recession [largest since 1st Repub. Depression], unemployment went from 7.2 - 10.8 % in less than two years.
-He initiated the largest peacetime tax INCREASE in US history - 1982 TEFRA
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
As much as I admired Reagan (I voted for him twice) he was wrong on healthcare. Maggie Thatcher who was more conservative than President Reagan believed in and supported England National Healthcare system for the simple reason that it worked and that affordable healthcare is a basic Christian obligation and right. President Reagan never proposed getting rid of medicare or medicaid so I guess it was not that bad of a program.
Google...federal debt by president...click on the wiki page that is the top link that comes up on the search.
Then scroll down and find the chart with federal spending in billions per year toward the bottom of the page. You can see spending goes up every year the amount of the yearly deficit changes because of revenue based on gdp, but the actual money spent by the fed govt goes up every year. I'm not trying to defend Reagan as much as I'm showing that liberals are lying to you as well.
Reagan was actually pretty big government guy. Look at the rise in government spending and debt during his term. Why not quote Barry Goldwater or something?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Reagon didn't increase the size of government he increased the size of the military which during the cold war drove Russia into bankruptcy trying to keep up. He won a war without firing a shot so that should make you liberals happy. Do some research Clinton spent more money during his term than Reagon did, but he had the tech bubble so he had more revenue coming in giving him a surplus in one of his 8 years. Every president in my life has spent more money than any previous president.
(1) He did increase the size of the government by increasing spending. I don't care which programs. Despite popular conservative conception, the military is a massive government program.
(2) I'm not a liberal, and the USSR was going down eventually anyway because its totalitarian communism was economically bankrupt.
(3) I don't care if Clinton spent more, Reagan didn't spend less than his predecessor either. That makes him part of the problem along with Clinton and everyone else.
@6second2004gto Good for you. And if we were all glad to pay taxes for it, then it could be a charity instead of a government program. The part you're forgetting is the part where you vote for politicians that use the police to force everyone to pay for it through taxes, and if they refuse to pay for it, they go to jail, and if they resist getting forced into jail, they could get shot. So if you don't want to fund slaughter, you get slaughtered. That's your Reaganite morality? Fuck your statism.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Reagan isn't the only president to police the world, it's pretty much what is expected of us so every president has done it to some extent whether the citizens agree with it or not. If I was to describe how I stand and believe in following the constitution the way our founders intended instead of the way a liberal judge would you would understand I'm a federalist. I stand for states rights and I believe in a large military because the union of the states was formed for the common defense.
History repeats it's self. Freedom isn't free. Someone had to pay for our freedom. Men and women gave their lives for us to be free. Don't accept money from a stranger.
Yes, Reagan was one hell of a speaker, but I must agree with the many pundits ans historians who have characterized him as an idiot who was woefully out of touch with the real America. This old recording supports that notion. Where would the senoir citizens of this country be without Medicare? Bad call Ronnie. And it's this same bull headed, addled mentallity that fuels that group of clowns called the "Tea Party." I prefer Tea Baggers...LOL
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
If you can't debate an issue....start calling names!!
Hard working Capitalists of the past, present and very short lived future are not as driven by greed as Socialist politicians are driven by power.
The "Greed" of capitalsits this nation has birthed made us the most giving, prosperous nation in the history of the world.
How about closing your laptop and going out and helping a fellow citizen in need as opposed to bashing the right and thinking voting liberal is going to feed the hungry.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Do some research every president since Reagon has spent more than he did. The difference is we have a great military to show for the money Reagon spent. What do we have to show for all the money Obama has spent? Obama spent more money in one year than Reagon did in 8 years so get your facts straight. Ya, Ya Clinton had a surplus in one of his 8 years but he spent more than any previous president he just benefitted from the tech and housing boom which gave him more revenue from taxes..
Reagan ushered in an era of greed with the idea that all who succeeded did so by the "sweat of their own brow." He never acknowledges that we benefit from a government that provides infrastructure necessary for our "sweat" to count for something. We are an arrogant citizenry failing to acknowledge our interdependence. Many things should be left to market forces, but not the health of our fellow human beings. The GOP has no moral compass regarding this issue.
Reagan was a lightweight, Clinton bailed him out. Now O'bama is cleaning up Bush's mess. You neo-cons need to start thinking on your own instead of depending on Rush and Sean to interpret the world for you.
Don't like trickle down economics? Look at the Democrats doing the same thing...Bailouts...to big to fail....? All those billions going to big business and banks to "save jobs". That sounds like another spin on trickle down to me when you give the big guys money with the excuse that it will save the little guy. Get a clue both parties are screwing us the dems just want the poor to think they are going to help them because they need their votes, but they don't give a shit about the poor.
6second2004gto -‘ Look at the Democrats doing the same thing...Bailouts’-
-
Bailouts, 1991 Savings and Loan and 2008 [save Bush’s ass in history books] – both -'because of DE-regulation'-, that began in the Reagan years, Repub. favoritism to the oligarchic elitists; yet, unfortunately - both done to prevent further damage to the overall economy.
Since the 1960’s Democrats –‘continually worked for’- and –‘accomplished’- Civil Rights, clean air, water, safe food and medicine, fair wages, equal pay, safe work places, Social Security, Medicare, HealthCare, Financial Reform, etc. – because the majority NEED IT .
While - Under the guise of supply-side economics … Conservatives, libertarians, corporate and family Elitists lobbied AND:
destroyed labor, deregulated Wall St. [-‘said they could regulate themselves’-], exported industries/jobs, ignored and helped monopolies, logarithmically created the largest DEBT in history
and logarithmically increased the PROFITS of –‘A FEW’- !
Research the community reinvestment act and see how clinton had a big part in the housing collapse. The national debt has grown every year since Reagon left office except one. Yes one single year the national debt went down slightly. Your Democrat hero Obama increased our national debt in two years more than Reagon did in 8. Over 8 years Clinton spent more than Reagon did over his 8 years look it up and get your facts straight. Ever heard of Obama's bail out? Who did that benefit most?
6second2004gto-‘… increased our national debt ...’-
-
Ignoring the fact, the Debt [obligation] grows exponentially based on the principal and interest do. Reagan as both Bushes –‘paid nothing down’- all three increased it greater than anyone else before them, per year.
Obama is committed to paying down ½ of Bush II’s debt in 4 years.
6second2004gto-‘ Ever heard of Obama's bail out?’-
-
No !
-
TARP and ESSA ??? Public Law 110-343 … (October 3, 2008) is signed into law by U.S. President George W. Bush 700 B$ [to save his ass in History books]
-
If you want to be taken seriously reduce the : distortions, Hyperbole, re-visionist history ….. and give –‘factual references …’-
I don't have to google anything...lol...I already know the facts Clinton was the one who expanded upon the Community reinvestment act allowing people to get home loans with no down payment, lower than normal credit ratings, or even no credit history at all. Sure the banks had a part in it the federal reserve system is a huge part of our problem, but you can't ignore clinton had a part in it. You can twist facts and use false stats all you want. Obama isn't the cure he is part of the problem.
@hackit12 Another Fun Fact!!! January, 1981: Ronald Reagan becomes the first U.S. President opposed to a constitutional amendment which provides equal rights for women." And she dick riding a president that did not want to give her equal rights.. Hmmm!!!!
@hackit12 Another Fun Fact!!! January, 1981: Ronald Reagan becomes the first U.S. President opposed to a constitutional amendment which provides equal rights for women." And she dick riding a president that did not want to give her equal rights.. Make you wonder!
Your numbers are wrong...I'm talking about actual money spent each year by the federal government. It goes up every year regardless of who the president was. The only reason I'm pointing this out is because liberals blame Reagan for the deficit, everyone since him has spent more money every year. Reagon's highest yearly total money spent in billions was 1,144 Clinton spent more than that every year with his highest year being his last in billions at 1,863. You're really missing my point.
6second2004gto --'It goes up every year regardless of who the president was. ''- ... liberals blame Reagan for the deficit ... - yOU ARE MAKING SHIT up ! - Bush -4.7 T$ 8 years 712 B/yr. Clinton -1.2 T$ 8 years 150 B/yr. *** G.H.W. Bush -1.2 T$ 4 years 150 B/yr. Reagan -1.7 T$ 8 years 212 B/yr. *** Carter -226 B$ 4 years 55 B/yr.
Google...federal debt by president...click on the wiki link that comes up at the top of the search. Scroll down and find the chart that shows federal spending per year in billions. The information is there and the facts remain actual spending by the federal government has gone up every year. Debt by a percentage of gdp changes based on how much production is happening in the country, but actual money spent goes up every year including Clinton's years.
My point is don't be fooled and follow one party as being the answer. Both of the major parties are growing the size of government every year. Bush II blew everyone out of the water as far as money spent. Obama was suppose to be the answer, but he has already spent more in two years than Bush II did in 8 years. We are in trouble if we continue to accept this type of over grown government it's unsustainable. It isn't a single presidents fault, but instead the fault of all of our politicians.
Since you want to cite google references try googling....national debt by president...find the chart that shows government spending by year and president. Every year since 1977 where the chart starts the amount spent goes up every year. The deficit amount changes by year based on gdp, but the actual amount spent by the federal government goes up every year. That shows the size and scope of out federal government has grown to large and is unsustainable.
De-regulation that caused our crisis started when Clinton expanded upon the community reinvestment act and freddie and fannie. You talk of favoritism to the oligarchic elitists, but Obama just helped them more than anyone ever has with his bailout. Yes I'm talking about the big bankers. How is Reagon solely responsible for our national debt when every president after him spent more than he did? Get a clue man neither party cares about the working class. I consider myself lucky to have a job
6second2004gto -'neither party cares about the working class...'-
-
Repeat ....
Since the 1960’s Democrats –‘continually worked for’- and –‘accomplished’- Civil Rights, clean air, water, safe food and medicine, fair wages, equal pay, safe work places, Social Security, Medicare, HealthCare, Financial Reform, etc. – because the majority NEED IT ..........
6second2004gto -'How is Reagon solely responsible for our national debt'-
-
" Bailouts, 1991 Savings and Loan [TAXPAYER FUNDED] and 2008 [save Bush’s ass in history books] – both -'because of DE-regulation'-, that -'began in the Reagan years'-..".
Reagan was right. Medicare was good as the celling not the ground. We have now brought forth a new enemy to the public, National Health Care. A program that will not only lead to a bankrupt nation, but will bring a dystopia of pain and suffering. With a socialistic like factor of control from the government. Take a good look at China and ask; Is this what I want my future and the future of my children to be? If the answer is no, you better reevaluate you voting record and vote Palin 2012.
are you on drugs. Reagan was talking about Medicare! It has not brought America into socialism. To corrollate one to the other, especially when one just wants people to have health care, is bonkers
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
wow..you're stupid...like really dumb. My mothers on medicaid and she wouldn't of died without it...moron....and over 40 years of employment, could of had a million dollars in savings..and our pathetic congress could have come up with a better plan instead of bankrupting it..you idiot..It's trial lawyers like John Edwards and Illegal aliens etc...that kill healthcare costs.
How right you are ! I'm glad to live in a country with complete medical care for everyone, paid by money from state and taxes. I would have been blinded by retinal detachement if the community wouldn't have paid for my complex and expensive treatment. Now i can work and pay the community the money back, it spended for me. Free health care surely isn't the thing which bankrupts western states.
~Republican$ are always saying that they hate"Big Government". What they really mean is that they hate government regulation.^Keep in mind that Republican$ don't work for you.They only work for BILLIONARES,CORPORATIONS& WALL STREET. They want to destroy MEDICARE because then they can give that money to the insurance co's. They want to destroy social security so they can give that money to Wall Street firms. They want to destroy UNIONS so that everybody makes minimum wage(like in Texas).
poindexterwitkowsky 7 months ago 3
watch?v=9MhvtZv04s8
CytherLynx 11 months ago
Reagan tripled the debt ... in 1980's dollars - 1.7 T$ (8 years) 212 B/yr.
-
After his failed attempt at giving a 25% tax reduction for everybody 1981 - 16 month recession [largest since 1st Repub. Depression], unemployment went from 7.2 - 10.8 % in less than two years.
-He initiated the largest peacetime tax INCREASE in US history - 1982 TEFRA
[National Review, WSJ, Forbes, Heritage Foundation, etc]
-
Making him the largest tax and spender of the 20th Century !
cont
21tikcah 1 year ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
...
references ...
-
“GOP Policies Have Crippled Our Economy" by David Stockman
[Reagan's Budget Director]
..
“How the Economy was Lost” by Paul Craig Roberts [Reagan’s Assistant [Secretary of the Treasury]
-
“A Taxing Experience” by Bruce Bartlet
[Former Reagan adviser]
21tikcah 1 year ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
As much as I admired Reagan (I voted for him twice) he was wrong on healthcare. Maggie Thatcher who was more conservative than President Reagan believed in and supported England National Healthcare system for the simple reason that it worked and that affordable healthcare is a basic Christian obligation and right. President Reagan never proposed getting rid of medicare or medicaid so I guess it was not that bad of a program.
JRF1961 1 year ago
Google...federal debt by president...click on the wiki page that is the top link that comes up on the search.
Then scroll down and find the chart with federal spending in billions per year toward the bottom of the page. You can see spending goes up every year the amount of the yearly deficit changes because of revenue based on gdp, but the actual money spent by the fed govt goes up every year. I'm not trying to defend Reagan as much as I'm showing that liberals are lying to you as well.
6second2004gto 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
6second2004gto -'I'm showing that liberals are lying'-
-
-'the amount spent goes up every year..'-
B.S. - only in Republican years historically 1970-2009
-
Bush -4.7 T$ 8 years 712 B/yr. --
Clinton -1.2 T$ 8 years 150 B/yr.
G.H.W. Bush -1.2 T$ 4 years 300 B/yr.
Reagan -1.7 T$ 8 years 212 B/yr.
Carter -226 B$ 4 years 55 B/yr.
hackit12 1 year ago
6second2004gto -'Google...federal debt by president...click on the wiki link ...'-
-
Your reference to Wikipedia disproves your crap too !
en.wikipedia org/wiki/National_debt_by_U.S._presidential_terms
-
-
6second2004gto 'I'm showing that liberals are lying'-
-
YEAaaaaaaa !
hackit12 1 year ago 5
Reagan was actually pretty big government guy. Look at the rise in government spending and debt during his term. Why not quote Barry Goldwater or something?
adjohnson916 1 year ago 7
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Reagon didn't increase the size of government he increased the size of the military which during the cold war drove Russia into bankruptcy trying to keep up. He won a war without firing a shot so that should make you liberals happy. Do some research Clinton spent more money during his term than Reagon did, but he had the tech bubble so he had more revenue coming in giving him a surplus in one of his 8 years. Every president in my life has spent more money than any previous president.
6second2004gto 1 year ago
@6second2004gto
(1) He did increase the size of the government by increasing spending. I don't care which programs. Despite popular conservative conception, the military is a massive government program.
(2) I'm not a liberal, and the USSR was going down eventually anyway because its totalitarian communism was economically bankrupt.
(3) I don't care if Clinton spent more, Reagan didn't spend less than his predecessor either. That makes him part of the problem along with Clinton and everyone else.
adjohnson916 1 year ago 4
Yes the military is a massive government program, but it's a necessary one that I'm glad to pay taxes to fund.
6second2004gto 1 year ago
@6second2004gto Good for you. And if we were all glad to pay taxes for it, then it could be a charity instead of a government program. The part you're forgetting is the part where you vote for politicians that use the police to force everyone to pay for it through taxes, and if they refuse to pay for it, they go to jail, and if they resist getting forced into jail, they could get shot. So if you don't want to fund slaughter, you get slaughtered. That's your Reaganite morality? Fuck your statism.
adjohnson916 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Reagan isn't the only president to police the world, it's pretty much what is expected of us so every president has done it to some extent whether the citizens agree with it or not. If I was to describe how I stand and believe in following the constitution the way our founders intended instead of the way a liberal judge would you would understand I'm a federalist. I stand for states rights and I believe in a large military because the union of the states was formed for the common defense.
6second2004gto 1 year ago
Comment removed
6second2004gto 1 year ago
Reagan = Epic Fail
LOL Republicans are always on the wrong side of history. And they are proud of it too.
RebelThoughts 1 year ago 4
History repeats it's self. Freedom isn't free. Someone had to pay for our freedom. Men and women gave their lives for us to be free. Don't accept money from a stranger.
bassjeff2005 1 year ago
Yes, Reagan was one hell of a speaker, but I must agree with the many pundits ans historians who have characterized him as an idiot who was woefully out of touch with the real America. This old recording supports that notion. Where would the senoir citizens of this country be without Medicare? Bad call Ronnie. And it's this same bull headed, addled mentallity that fuels that group of clowns called the "Tea Party." I prefer Tea Baggers...LOL
handsomedevill1001 1 year ago 5
She seems so proud reciting the dubious quote.
I bet she stayed up all night memorizing it, and surprised her handlers with it.
mikester695 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
If you can't debate an issue....start calling names!!
Hard working Capitalists of the past, present and very short lived future are not as driven by greed as Socialist politicians are driven by power.
The "Greed" of capitalsits this nation has birthed made us the most giving, prosperous nation in the history of the world.
How about closing your laptop and going out and helping a fellow citizen in need as opposed to bashing the right and thinking voting liberal is going to feed the hungry.
Kilmarley 2 years ago
Hmmm- wasn't it Ronny Ray-Gun that saddled this nation with a $5,000,000,000,000 debt?
Talk about "passing freedom on to our children"! Sheesh! Yeah- he sure passed something on! I hope he's enjoying eternity in hades!
hightechelec 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Do some research every president since Reagon has spent more than he did. The difference is we have a great military to show for the money Reagon spent. What do we have to show for all the money Obama has spent? Obama spent more money in one year than Reagon did in 8 years so get your facts straight. Ya, Ya Clinton had a surplus in one of his 8 years but he spent more than any previous president he just benefitted from the tech and housing boom which gave him more revenue from taxes..
6second2004gto 1 year ago
Reagan ushered in an era of greed with the idea that all who succeeded did so by the "sweat of their own brow." He never acknowledges that we benefit from a government that provides infrastructure necessary for our "sweat" to count for something. We are an arrogant citizenry failing to acknowledge our interdependence. Many things should be left to market forces, but not the health of our fellow human beings. The GOP has no moral compass regarding this issue.
catmustea 2 years ago 10
Reagan was a lightweight, Clinton bailed him out. Now O'bama is cleaning up Bush's mess. You neo-cons need to start thinking on your own instead of depending on Rush and Sean to interpret the world for you.
1970yr 2 years ago 10
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Reagan was the greatest presidant in the last 100 years. Reagonomics worked!!! and he slowed the onslaught of socialism.
scrapdaddy811 2 years ago
Thanks for the laugh, that's the funniest thing I've read all week.
dp812 2 years ago
idiot
hightechelec 2 years ago
Put ronnie on the penny, then take all of them out of circulation; because they did not trickle down - they were concentrated up - by his policies !
hackit12 1 year ago
Don't like trickle down economics? Look at the Democrats doing the same thing...Bailouts...to big to fail....? All those billions going to big business and banks to "save jobs". That sounds like another spin on trickle down to me when you give the big guys money with the excuse that it will save the little guy. Get a clue both parties are screwing us the dems just want the poor to think they are going to help them because they need their votes, but they don't give a shit about the poor.
6second2004gto 1 year ago
6second2004gto -‘Don't like trickle down economics?-‘
-
What is there to like, the -'wealthy got richer'- – lower classes '-can not keep up with inflation'-.
Financed the exportation of American industries/jobs.
Greatest lender nation before the Reagan Admin. con-jobs; Greatest debtor nation directly because of their policies, NOW !
Cont
hackit12 1 year ago 9
6second2004gto -‘ Look at the Democrats doing the same thing...Bailouts’-
-
Bailouts, 1991 Savings and Loan and 2008 [save Bush’s ass in history books] – both -'because of DE-regulation'-, that began in the Reagan years, Repub. favoritism to the oligarchic elitists; yet, unfortunately - both done to prevent further damage to the overall economy.
Cont
hackit12 1 year ago 5
2004gto -‘ both parties are screwing us …’-
-
Since the 1960’s Democrats –‘continually worked for’- and –‘accomplished’- Civil Rights, clean air, water, safe food and medicine, fair wages, equal pay, safe work places, Social Security, Medicare, HealthCare, Financial Reform, etc. – because the majority NEED IT .
Cont
hackit12 1 year ago 3
…
While - Under the guise of supply-side economics … Conservatives, libertarians, corporate and family Elitists lobbied AND:
destroyed labor, deregulated Wall St. [-‘said they could regulate themselves’-], exported industries/jobs, ignored and helped monopolies, logarithmically created the largest DEBT in history
and logarithmically increased the PROFITS of –‘A FEW’- !
hackit12 1 year ago 9
Research the community reinvestment act and see how clinton had a big part in the housing collapse. The national debt has grown every year since Reagon left office except one. Yes one single year the national debt went down slightly. Your Democrat hero Obama increased our national debt in two years more than Reagon did in 8. Over 8 years Clinton spent more than Reagon did over his 8 years look it up and get your facts straight. Ever heard of Obama's bail out? Who did that benefit most?
6second2004gto 1 year ago
6second2004gto –‘ community reinvestment act …-‘
-
Clinton in 2000 – blocked anti-predatory lending, Bush re-initiated them ...
GOOGLE … “How HUD Mortgage Policy Fed The Crisis”
-
75% of loans -'were fraudulent'- from the Banks and lenders ! 10’s of thousands of lenders have already been litigated ! Google “FBI+Subprime+fraud”
Financial institutions were involved in deceptive and complex predatory practices, for short-term profits according the FBI.
cont
hackit12 1 year ago 8
6second2004gto-‘… increased our national debt ...’-
-
Ignoring the fact, the Debt [obligation] grows exponentially based on the principal and interest do. Reagan as both Bushes –‘paid nothing down’- all three increased it greater than anyone else before them, per year.
Obama is committed to paying down ½ of Bush II’s debt in 4 years.
cont
hackit12 1 year ago 6
-
6second2004gto-‘ Clinton spent more than Reagon’-
-
Clinton -1.2 T$ 8 years 150 B/yr.
G.H.W. Bush -1.2 T$ 4 years 150 B/yr.
Reagan -1.7 T$ 8 years 212 B/yr.
cont
hackit12 1 year ago 5
6second2004gto-‘ Ever heard of Obama's bail out?’-
-
No !
-
TARP and ESSA ??? Public Law 110-343 … (October 3, 2008) is signed into law by U.S. President George W. Bush 700 B$ [to save his ass in History books]
-
If you want to be taken seriously reduce the : distortions, Hyperbole, re-visionist history ….. and give –‘factual references …’-
hackit12 1 year ago 10
I don't have to google anything...lol...I already know the facts Clinton was the one who expanded upon the Community reinvestment act allowing people to get home loans with no down payment, lower than normal credit ratings, or even no credit history at all. Sure the banks had a part in it the federal reserve system is a huge part of our problem, but you can't ignore clinton had a part in it. You can twist facts and use false stats all you want. Obama isn't the cure he is part of the problem.
6second2004gto 1 year ago
6second2004gto ....
Clinton in 2000 – blocked anti-predatory lending, BUSH RE-INITIATED THEM ...
GOOGLE … “How HUD Mortgage Policy Fed The Crisis”
hackit12 1 year ago 10
@hackit12 Another Fun Fact!!! January, 1981: Ronald Reagan becomes the first U.S. President opposed to a constitutional amendment which provides equal rights for women." And she dick riding a president that did not want to give her equal rights.. Hmmm!!!!
NORFMEMP 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@hackit12 Another Fun Fact!!! January, 1981: Ronald Reagan becomes the first U.S. President opposed to a constitutional amendment which provides equal rights for women." And she dick riding a president that did not want to give her equal rights.. Make you wonder!
NORFMEMP 1 year ago
Your numbers are wrong...I'm talking about actual money spent each year by the federal government. It goes up every year regardless of who the president was. The only reason I'm pointing this out is because liberals blame Reagan for the deficit, everyone since him has spent more money every year. Reagon's highest yearly total money spent in billions was 1,144 Clinton spent more than that every year with his highest year being his last in billions at 1,863. You're really missing my point.
6second2004gto 1 year ago
hackit12 1 year ago
Google...federal debt by president...click on the wiki link that comes up at the top of the search. Scroll down and find the chart that shows federal spending per year in billions. The information is there and the facts remain actual spending by the federal government has gone up every year. Debt by a percentage of gdp changes based on how much production is happening in the country, but actual money spent goes up every year including Clinton's years.
6second2004gto 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@6second2004gto
-
6second2004gto -'the amount spent goes up every year..'-
B.S. - only in Republican years historically 1970-2009
-
--Bush -4.7 T$ 8 years 712 B/yr. --
Clinton -1.2 T$ 8 years 150 B/yr.
G.H.W. Bush -1.2 T$ 4 years 300 B/yr.
Reagan -1.7 T$ 8 years 212 B/yr.
Carter -226 B$ 4 years 55 B/yr.
hackit12 1 year ago 6
This has been flagged as spam show
6second2004gto -'Google...federal debt by president...click on the wiki link ...'-
-
Your reference to Wikipedia disproves your crap too !
en.wikipedia org/wiki/National_debt_by_U.S._presidential_terms
-
-
6second2004gto 'I'm showing that liberals are lying'-
YEAaaaaaaa !
hackit12 1 year ago
My point is don't be fooled and follow one party as being the answer. Both of the major parties are growing the size of government every year. Bush II blew everyone out of the water as far as money spent. Obama was suppose to be the answer, but he has already spent more in two years than Bush II did in 8 years. We are in trouble if we continue to accept this type of over grown government it's unsustainable. It isn't a single presidents fault, but instead the fault of all of our politicians.
6second2004gto 1 year ago
Since you want to cite google references try googling....national debt by president...find the chart that shows government spending by year and president. Every year since 1977 where the chart starts the amount spent goes up every year. The deficit amount changes by year based on gdp, but the actual amount spent by the federal government goes up every year. That shows the size and scope of out federal government has grown to large and is unsustainable.
6second2004gto 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
6second2004gto -'the amount spent goes up every year..'-
-
--Bush -4.7 T$ 8 years 712 B/yr. --
Clinton -1.2 T$ 8 years 150 B/yr.
G.H.W. Bush -1.2 T$ 4 years 150 B/yr.
Reagan -1.7 T$ 8 years 212 B/yr.
Carter -226 B$ 4 years 55 B/yr.
hackit12 1 year ago 7
De-regulation that caused our crisis started when Clinton expanded upon the community reinvestment act and freddie and fannie. You talk of favoritism to the oligarchic elitists, but Obama just helped them more than anyone ever has with his bailout. Yes I'm talking about the big bankers. How is Reagon solely responsible for our national debt when every president after him spent more than he did? Get a clue man neither party cares about the working class. I consider myself lucky to have a job
6second2004gto 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
6second2004gto -'neither party cares about the working class...'-
-
Repeat ....
Since the 1960’s Democrats –‘continually worked for’- and –‘accomplished’- Civil Rights, clean air, water, safe food and medicine, fair wages, equal pay, safe work places, Social Security, Medicare, HealthCare, Financial Reform, etc. – because the majority NEED IT ..........
hackit12 1 year ago 10
@6second2004gto -'Obama .... with his bailout. '-
-
Full of MUS -MADE UP SHIT ....
-
Tarp & ESSA .... Public Law 110-343, signed into law by U.S. President George W. Bush on October 3, 2008
hackit12 1 year ago 8
This has been flagged as spam show
6second2004gto -'How is Reagon solely responsible for our national debt'-
-
" Bailouts, 1991 Savings and Loan [TAXPAYER FUNDED] and 2008 [save Bush’s ass in history books] – both -'because of DE-regulation'-, that -'began in the Reagan years'-..".
hackit12 1 year ago 4
Reagan was right. Medicare was good as the celling not the ground. We have now brought forth a new enemy to the public, National Health Care. A program that will not only lead to a bankrupt nation, but will bring a dystopia of pain and suffering. With a socialistic like factor of control from the government. Take a good look at China and ask; Is this what I want my future and the future of my children to be? If the answer is no, you better reevaluate you voting record and vote Palin 2012.
magicman4293 2 years ago
are you on drugs. Reagan was talking about Medicare! It has not brought America into socialism. To corrollate one to the other, especially when one just wants people to have health care, is bonkers
dalastejas 2 years ago
Thank god for Medicare, or my grandmother would have died 20 years earlier.
He did get his other wish though: Breaking the unions. Good job, bozo.
Reagan = imbecile.
boilerplate 3 years ago 8
i agree. i didnt like him
Facebook289 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
wow..you're stupid...like really dumb. My mothers on medicaid and she wouldn't of died without it...moron....and over 40 years of employment, could of had a million dollars in savings..and our pathetic congress could have come up with a better plan instead of bankrupting it..you idiot..It's trial lawyers like John Edwards and Illegal aliens etc...that kill healthcare costs.
IdiotsForObamaDotCom 2 years ago
How right you are ! I'm glad to live in a country with complete medical care for everyone, paid by money from state and taxes. I would have been blinded by retinal detachement if the community wouldn't have paid for my complex and expensive treatment. Now i can work and pay the community the money back, it spended for me. Free health care surely isn't the thing which bankrupts western states.
agt334 2 years ago 8