As a non player it`s fascinating to see the fierce arguments that rage between you all. I agree that the pianissimo playing is so fine.Good that you all have such a stunning hero to enjoy.
I learnt that way of playing a long time ago from Albert Levêque. It is a marvelous way of interpreting that sort of music on the piano. Not being a great fan of the tinny sound of the clavicembalo, I think Rameau himself would have preferred this way of doing things :-)
C'est brillant pianistiquement, mais ce n'est musicalement pas très bon, c'est même très discutable... Cherchez Marcelle Meyer, pour s'en tenir au piano, dans la même pièce : pianistiquement aussi indiscutable, mais musicalement tout autre chose/
Comparing Sokolovou with the playing of Sandro Bisotti , I just can't help thinking that Bisotti's has more brightness in it and it conveys the serene impulses more than Sokolov's interpretation. It may sound presumptuous to judge it like that but I can't help it! =) Just hear yourself and decide!
PS: Of course there's no discussion about Sokolov's technical brilliance!
@ metteholm: You are right ! but see , some audience had a totally & extremely opposite point of view..at freeqwerqwer ( has a 3 comments..) by him/her this performance is...HEAVY & PHILOSOPHICAL...COULD YOU IMAGINE ?
I think he plays this piece a tad too much seriously. This piece should have a smile to it. It should just be light, and whimsical, not pensive and heavy.
Why can't this piece be pensive and heavy? Well because this piece uses a lot of trills. Trills are an ornament, an embelllishment, like a flower. Furthermore, music written in that period of baroque and pre-baroque do not express heavy, pensive, sad, or other such intense moods. That came in the romantic era and after.
Haven't you heard of all the Tombeaus, or Frobergers work that dealth with melancholy? Did the human condition of sadness not exist before 1750? Listen to the Passions of Bach or his Chorale Preludes.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
This piece should be delicate but his playing is too heavy. .It was not restrained enough as demanded by this period. He put too much thought into this piece, almost into the romantic realm. He should just play it lightly, whimsical, and with restrained. Keep it simple, not philosophical.
Je trouve qu'il y a un peu de tristesse a l'interieur du jeu de monsieur Sokolov et ca rend ce morceau finalement tres transcendant. Je le trouve un hymne a la liberte d'artiste ce pianiste !
Impossibly good!
Messiaen 2 months ago 2
Perfection style presentation from early Barok period.
Thanks for this beautiful video...
Modu 3 months ago
I'm speechless. Superb!!!1
scholym 4 months ago 2
Passion and finesse! Intoxicating playing. Thank you for posting and to
paulostroff99 for sharing.
Kievest 6 months ago 3
As a non player it`s fascinating to see the fierce arguments that rage between you all. I agree that the pianissimo playing is so fine.Good that you all have such a stunning hero to enjoy.
amezcuaist 6 months ago
Non oso pensare a come eseguirebbe William Byrd, Couperin, Scarlatti o addirittura Frescobaldi !!!! Santo cielo, che raffinatezza ... elefantiaca !!!
darkblueangel1956 7 months ago
das ist sehr fantastisch,wie schön!
olivia7793 7 months ago
WOnderful!!!
pianist626262 7 months ago
I really like this piece and his playing but most of all his ped. You nearly can't hear him using it....10 * from me :)
d3o1r0i3n1a989 8 months ago
The pianissimo from 0:58 blew me away.... and the ornaments on 1:11... How the hell is it even possible?
Messiaen 8 months ago
Absolutely astonishing. Moments like 1:45 take my breath away. I've never heard such intensely precise articulation!
AldenHardaway 9 months ago
O! M! G!!!!
Aktinovolos 11 months ago
Ineffable
gassyjeff 11 months ago
I learnt that way of playing a long time ago from Albert Levêque. It is a marvelous way of interpreting that sort of music on the piano. Not being a great fan of the tinny sound of the clavicembalo, I think Rameau himself would have preferred this way of doing things :-)
kaetuoq 1 year ago
Beautifully done! Thank you!
BettyCope 1 year ago
Amazing! I can not imagine this is similar to a pianist who is able to do so?
V9o8x7 1 year ago
Impressive andemotional - both brain and heart are moved!
hpcine 1 year ago 2
(Y) szuper!
71002943 1 year ago
On ne peut comparer à Madame Meyer : ce sont deux conceptions très différentes du jeu des partitions de la période sur "piano moderne".
eneduoc 1 year ago
I do not like the turns of the piano. If one does it at all it should be on a harpsichord in mt opinion.
Johannes999999999 1 year ago
@Johannes999999999 Ridiculous!
benedetti 1 year ago
C'est brillant pianistiquement, mais ce n'est musicalement pas très bon, c'est même très discutable... Cherchez Marcelle Meyer, pour s'en tenir au piano, dans la même pièce : pianistiquement aussi indiscutable, mais musicalement tout autre chose/
pianotonton 1 year ago
Man, if anyone could be said to at the same level of absolute mastery of the Baroque as Glenn Gould, it's Sokolov. His perfection is awe-inspiring.
PointyTail 1 year ago 4
Wonderful!
elfenomeno777 1 year ago
Comparing Sokolovou with the playing of Sandro Bisotti , I just can't help thinking that Bisotti's has more brightness in it and it conveys the serene impulses more than Sokolov's interpretation. It may sound presumptuous to judge it like that but I can't help it! =) Just hear yourself and decide!
PS: Of course there's no discussion about Sokolov's technical brilliance!
Cathayline 1 year ago
@Cathayline
Are you nuts? Comparing Sokolov to Sandro Bisotti is like comparing a Formel 1 race car with a bicycle.
Messiaen 8 months ago 3
Veramente eccellente! complimenti!
MaestroINVY 1 year ago
Guys, this is just perfect.
Zornament 1 year ago
No, heavy he is definitely not. Some people think, that french especially ornamentation is intellecually demanding.
Some find his playing very secretive.
He is just doing that very unusual thing: playing the piano technically piano-wise, and musically harpsicord-wise.
metteholm75 1 year ago 2
He is specially.... MASTER of ornaments...BRILLIANT ! Absolute PERFECTION !!! GENIUS !
sam0xin 1 year ago
I never heard anyone perform true french ornamentation this light on a piano. Fantastic!
metteholm75 1 year ago 3
@ metteholm: You are right ! but see , some audience had a totally & extremely opposite point of view..at freeqwerqwer ( has a 3 comments..) by him/her this performance is...HEAVY & PHILOSOPHICAL...COULD YOU IMAGINE ?
sam0xin 1 year ago
p.s. if comment invisible, you have to push on Reply...blue link... on the right.
sam0xin 1 year ago
Not Lang Lang , not Yuja Wang, not Perhia.
The good ones are Rafal Blechacz, Solokov, Martha Argerich, Pollini, Yundi Li and maybe many people we dont even know
terrygowork 2 years ago
Je l'aime sokolov
catastrouph39 2 years ago 2
@catastrouph39 me too
terrygowork 2 years ago
ENCORE!
catastrouph39 2 years ago
and i was in his concert!) amazing!111
Krinkelss1 2 years ago
Wow !
What else is there to say ? Just : wow!
The english language runs out of words to describe what this keyboard wizard does ... !
Thank you for sharing this with everyone AntonioDGO.
simonetr81 2 years ago
This really is quite marvellous
fingaz000 2 years ago
At the moment it's hard to find anything better: Il y a Sokolov, et il y a les pianistes. (Le Figaro, Paris, November 2007)
espirito999 2 years ago 5
Is the same theme of Haendel' s ostinato !!!
vivacecilia 2 years ago
clear, detached notes, eloquent rythm, overall view. Great artist.
pslogge 2 years ago 21
Que dire ? C'est excellentissime !
ElisabethLepidi 2 years ago 4
What shall I do with you, Mr. Sokolov?!
I cannot hear anything else but you!
You've ruined my pleasurely-leasurely-ut-morning! ;)
Babejuda 2 years ago
Wow wow wow . . this man never stops to surprise me, what an articulation !!
pianist007 2 years ago 5
Why doesn't he have the right to de-contextualize ?
ainhoator 2 years ago
why you people pushing minuses on baidaiJAY ?
I think he/she means that... it is IMPOSIBLE that human can NOT do this...! rather positive meaning !
sam0xin 2 years ago
Thanks God ! We are SO LUCKY to be contemporary of this GENIUS MUSICIAN !
Hail to MASTER SOKOLOV !
sam0xin 2 years ago 2
Sehr gut!
bubinusol 2 years ago 2
I think he plays this piece a tad too much seriously. This piece should have a smile to it. It should just be light, and whimsical, not pensive and heavy.
freeqwerqwer 2 years ago
why not pensive and heavy? whats wrong with dense, sad, intense...why it has to be non seriously?
cineasta71 2 years ago
Why can't this piece be pensive and heavy? Well because this piece uses a lot of trills. Trills are an ornament, an embelllishment, like a flower. Furthermore, music written in that period of baroque and pre-baroque do not express heavy, pensive, sad, or other such intense moods. That came in the romantic era and after.
freeqwerqwer 2 years ago
Haven't you heard of all the Tombeaus, or Frobergers work that dealth with melancholy? Did the human condition of sadness not exist before 1750? Listen to the Passions of Bach or his Chorale Preludes.
Renshen1957 2 years ago
For starts, this ballet is for a comic opera... not for a tragic one.
SendMeLies 2 years ago
this is not heavy this is musical.
Oblomov18 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This piece should be delicate but his playing is too heavy. .It was not restrained enough as demanded by this period. He put too much thought into this piece, almost into the romantic realm. He should just play it lightly, whimsical, and with restrained. Keep it simple, not philosophical.
freeqwerqwer 2 years ago
Reminded me immediately of the Opera Ballet Performance on youtube to a tee.
Renshen1957 2 years ago
БРАВО, МАЭСТРО, БРАВО!!!
А какое счастье "вживую" слышать Вас!
Спасибо за концерт 12.04.2009 в БЗФ!
еще год ждать...
veraemick 2 years ago 4
@ veraemick ! А вы не скажите где и когда господин Соколов будет концертировать?
Или где можно найти информацию вообще...о нём ???
заранее благодарю.
sam0xin 1 year ago
Actually this piece and Couperin's Tic-Toc-Choc are the only pieces I would be listening to over and over again of all Sokolov's performances
katkula 2 years ago
That's because you haven't heard his other interpretations.
nbharakey 2 years ago
PARFAIT
lagrandduc 2 years ago
Je trouve qu'il y a un peu de tristesse a l'interieur du jeu de monsieur Sokolov et ca rend ce morceau finalement tres transcendant. Je le trouve un hymne a la liberte d'artiste ce pianiste !
zhoujinquan 3 years ago 4
Pure keyboard genius! Phenomenal!
smudgepots 3 years ago 3
Fantastic!! the style of clavicembalo in the piano!
A great interpretation!
Lieder83 3 years ago 34
Reminds me of how Glenn Gould would mimic the Harpsichord when he played Bach on the piano
wolfgang7445 3 years ago
There are no words to express what I feel.I mean...how?how is he playing like that,that's so interesting,so new and so amazing!!Great!
go9zu 3 years ago 5
c'est le rondeau des indes galantes plutot
Sandalfon 3 years ago
Tout simplement Génial, une de mes versions préférées, du rythme et de la gaieté et une parfaite maitrise dans l'exécution des trilles.
Bravo.
Sokolov est indiscutablement un des meilleurs pianistes actuels et il excelle dans la musique "Baroque".
givemetime123 3 years ago 2
Cos'ha quest'uomo nelle mani? enorme
enantiodrom 3 years ago 2
:) è UNA BATTUTA?
sinding81 3 years ago
No, è un'esclamazione :) E' un pianista eccelso.
enantiodrom 3 years ago
ahaha! è vero...suona sporca come battuta...certo che è enorme veramente, in ogni senso (tanto è lo stesso)!
bivariis 3 years ago
FANTASTIC!
Sporadicmystic 3 years ago 6
Those ARE amazingly played ornaments.
palcsi 3 years ago 7
never liked playing trills. but i recon i could take some lessons from Grigory.
chad410 3 years ago