@AtheismCentral of course Darwin was great, but he did not anderstand,that we need to evolve,that natural selection must become artificial selection, and survival of the fitest must become domination of the strong over the weak.just imagine a new breed of super human being.
who are you to define who is the strong and who are the weak?
Aside from that, I value things such as compassion, kindness, understanding and equality. Weak Human Beings? Tell me what separates you from other people. What makes you individually separate from the rest of the Human race
I've studied Spencer and Darwin, and no where did they ever speak of a new super human race. Spencer was just an uber-Capitalist cock sucking fuck face. And if your supporting weeding out the weak do you think we would evolve in your life time? Ha, no, you'll be long gone whenever that would happen, suggesting it would. If the theory was correct (which scientifically speaking it's just not sound) Natural selection would probably weed you out first anyway
@AtheismCentral you misanderstand me, i never said that i was strong nor weak, but i wish a superior human race. spencer did not think of that but my idea came from the roots of is. and of course i will die before that happen but i dont care, i care more about the fact that humanity may evolve then my own life.im not a pathetic being who think only of himself. plus they are inferiors humans , we are not equal,so stop with ur christians morals.
The book's full title is On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, while for the 6th edition of 1872 the title was changed to The Origin of Species.
If you believe your video represents a better understanding of Spencer then my Unabridged 1865 edition of "Social Statics" ; then I would love to hear how.
It does not seem like you read any of the articles, I will ask that you do so. Otherwise, you may going on believing in your faith and showing your intellectual dishonesty.
Fuck herbet spencer
AtheismCentral 7 months ago
@AtheismCentral die you weakling fool
aneanthesieus 5 months ago
@aneanthesieus
Fuck you, and fuck Herber Spencer. Charles Darwin one of my hero's, would laugh at your elitist bullshit.
AtheismCentral 5 months ago
@AtheismCentral of course Darwin was great, but he did not anderstand,that we need to evolve,that natural selection must become artificial selection, and survival of the fitest must become domination of the strong over the weak.just imagine a new breed of super human being.
aneanthesieus 5 months ago
@aneanthesieus
who are you to define who is the strong and who are the weak?
Aside from that, I value things such as compassion, kindness, understanding and equality. Weak Human Beings? Tell me what separates you from other people. What makes you individually separate from the rest of the Human race
AtheismCentral 5 months ago
@aneanthesieus
I've studied Spencer and Darwin, and no where did they ever speak of a new super human race. Spencer was just an uber-Capitalist cock sucking fuck face. And if your supporting weeding out the weak do you think we would evolve in your life time? Ha, no, you'll be long gone whenever that would happen, suggesting it would. If the theory was correct (which scientifically speaking it's just not sound) Natural selection would probably weed you out first anyway
AtheismCentral 5 months ago
@AtheismCentral you misanderstand me, i never said that i was strong nor weak, but i wish a superior human race. spencer did not think of that but my idea came from the roots of is. and of course i will die before that happen but i dont care, i care more about the fact that humanity may evolve then my own life.im not a pathetic being who think only of himself. plus they are inferiors humans , we are not equal,so stop with ur christians morals.
aneanthesieus 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You can't be a Darwinist while not being a Social Darwinist too, it's like being half way Darwinist.
TakisAthensGr 1 year ago
Comment removed
TakisAthensGr 1 year ago
Comment removed
TakisAthensGr 1 year ago
Testing
Harpakhrad11 2 years ago
The book's full title is On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, while for the 6th edition of 1872 the title was changed to The Origin of Species.
"Favored Races" <- QED
bigwhammyRocks 3 years ago
That is true, but I fail to see what that has to do with the video or the articles.
Harpakhrad11 3 years ago
Agreed, it was more directed to the video this was in response to. (she disabled comments)
ie Darwin doesn't skate away Scott free while they try to pin it on Spencer, who you have defended quite well.
bigwhammyRocks 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nice Video lolz, my names Katherine, im feelin n0rty and h0rn3y if any guyz wana chat im usually on
___ FriendlyFlirts..dot..COM ___ my username there is Katherine-ehahdjb chat soon ;)
abdelrahmanadelomar 3 years ago
"that shows insecurity on your part"~ naomi94
I'm not the one that disabled comments on my video.
Harpakhrad11 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
sorry dude
i think you are wrong on this one
naomi94 4 years ago
How So?
Harpakhrad11 4 years ago
If you believe your video represents a better understanding of Spencer then my Unabridged 1865 edition of "Social Statics" ; then I would love to hear how.
It does not seem like you read any of the articles, I will ask that you do so. Otherwise, you may going on believing in your faith and showing your intellectual dishonesty.
Harpakhrad11 4 years ago
You always fold in the face of secular criticism.
Harpakhrad11 4 years ago
"if it is bullshit - then prove it
use evidence to support your conclusions
if you can not prove it then it is just an opinion" ~ naomi94
Harpakhrad11 4 years ago