evidently, to compare that with de burka would be like to compare the occidental wedding dress with the burka. jejeje
The burka search to hide the wemen , to humiliate them to disappear their identity, their human rights , their civils rights etc... only in order to protect one rigth ; the sacred rigth of close their maw.
It is important to notice that Vienna had its development thanks to the Habsburgs. The people from many parts of the empire came there and culture was promoted, so that Mozart, Beethoven (who had the Archduke Rainier as a friend), Schubert, Strauss Sr and Jr (and brothers),Liszt, and Lehar, among others, flourished here. Interesting to note that Jews like Mahler and Freud were able to work under the Habsburgs. Klimt painted there in the early 20th century. What culture has a republic produced?
Prüfungsfrage aus Tourismus: Nennen Sie fünf Museen von Weltrang in Wien, die es auch noch geben würde, wenn Habsburg und sein Hof noch an der Macht wären? Mir sind keine fünf eingefallen. Ist es doch so, dass Österreich die Habsburger nur rausgeschmissen hat, um endlich Geld verdienen zu können.
@samk1101 because he died in Madeira in exile. Otto Habsburg have not been allowed transportation of mortal remains to Wien, because citizens of Madeira would be offend.
@motamaredah It's an old tradition for mourning. If you ever saw the photos during the funeral of George VI you would have seen the three queens (Queen Elizabeth II, the queen "mum", and Queen Mary) together in mourning with their heads covered in black veils. Perhaps, it was to keep people from seeing their grief in public, but that is only a possible explanation.
It's a good thing this degenerate bunch is gone. They treated their subjects like their personal possession and cared only for themselves or rather: for their power. The curious thing is, had they more cared for the people of the empire, they might have kept their status, but so, history has swept them away.
@ThatGuyFromAustria Well i am glad im from Denmark, still a royal kingdom, not an infernal republic, we do not live in the dust and dirt like you have done since 1918, we still live in the sunlight of a monarchy :) You have a beautifull country but you spot it by beeing a republic now !!!
@Vonwar01, and what did you get out of it? You actually paying a bunch of aristocrats for being there, and maybe supplying the boulevard press with some scandals from time to time? There are cheaper ways of entertainment.
@ThatGuyFromAustria Hey, maybe i was a little harsh on the republic, but as a matter of fact, we have a democracy, but still a constitutional Monarcy which we have been since 1849. I do not see any problem in converting Austria into the same Constitutional Monarchy like us. Maybe it is a little too late, but it is a possibility. Personally i would never be able to respect a President as a sovereign if i had the choice between a President and a Monarch.
@Vonwar01 : I personally prefer a president. They can be elected (and impeached if they turn out foul) whereas monarchs sit on their thrones till they die regardless of being good or bad for their countries. They can't be forced out of office by their subjects. I personally prefer being a citizen to being a subject, being a free man to being a slave of a degenerated royal family!
@HappyDay989 : In our country, the Netherlands, Monarchy is embbed by law. If the people decide to abolish our Monarchy, it just needs an amendement on the constitution. In Europe, Monarchies are democratically organized.
@HappyDay989 ... like that impeachment thing's worked out so well for all the countries which have ever tried it... let's face it.. to remove someone who's holding an 'elected' office is about as difficult as getting rid of a monarch... at least a monarch is responsible for what he does and doesn't turn around after 8 years and billions of debts and says... Ooopsie... sorry, my bet.. cheers everyone, it's been nice.. send me my pension cheque to my retirement home in Florida...!!
@HappyDay989 Presidents in the Parliamentary system are former politicians who are elected by the national parliament after some fighting amongst the parties and are colorless. Royals can be forced out of office as can be seen with Edward VIII, the Duke of Windsor, if we are talking of democratic kingdoms as are those of Europe. Even in republics, most people are more interested in visiting royals bringing commercial and cultural attaches with them. Monarchs are more popular than presidents.
@HappyDay989 There is no slavery in a democratic constitutional monarchy, where the monarch is the Head of State and whose powers are delimited by law. You must be thinking back 150 or 250 years. Denmark, Norway, Sweden, the UK, the Netherlands, Belgium, Spain are monarchies and solid democracies. Come up to date. Remember what happened to the Republique Revolutionaire of 1794?
@ThatGuyFromAustria Since the 5. June 1849 Denmark has been a constitutional Monarchy, which has had more or less free elections since this date. (reason for writing more or less is that women did not have the right to vote from the start, ppl that did not own their own home did not etc.)
I do not feel entertained by the royals, they are to me an honourable and honest representative of my country, they are it for life not for 4 or 7-8 years only.!
@ThatGuyFromAustria They don't pay a "bunch of aristocrats". The Queen of Denmark is the Head of State, as are other monarchs, and the immediate members of the Royal Family, with their long historic ties to that noble country, bring a personal touch to the lives and events of the citizens. The Head of State of Austria is a President, but how much of a personal touch does he bring? Not much, I would say. Presidents come and go almost without a ripple.
@FRAGIORGIO1, please, PLEASE stop it you little idiot. I don't want to block you, but your display of lack of historical and political understanding is painful. Please go back to primary school and learn about the political functions of kings, presidents, et cetera. You're like somebody who can't even count 2 and 2 together wants do debate differential equations.
@ThatGuyFromAustria You apparently cover up your ignorance of governmental institutions and history by your call to block me from your site. Little that bothers me. The President of Austria is the Chief of State and the Kanzler is the Prime Minister and head of government. That system prevails also in Germany and Italy. In the constitutional monarchies of Europe, the Head of State is the monarch, and the political head is generally called the Prime Minister. Absolute monarchy is different
@ThatGuyFromAustria What do you know of Taafe's administration in Austria or of Andrassy in Hungary? What about the development of Christian Socialism and Social Democracy in Austria in the last quarter of the 19th century? Did you know Franz Josef accepted and even pushed universal suffrage early in the 20th century? Did you know of the passing of civil marriage and secular education in the 1860s? I'm not talking Veggans.
@ThatGuyFromAustria Well maybe they did so in Austria-Hungary, but NOT in Denmark, therefore we have a constitutional Monarchy with more than 90% support in the population.
@ThatGuyFromAustria You are ignorant of the facts of history. Kaiser Franz I was very popular in the early 1800s and Franz Josef got that way later in his reign. The problem was the beginning of cries for independence from many ethnic groups that were actually mixed themselves and were encouraged by Wilson and enemies of unity. Czechoslovakia, for example had Czechs, millions of German speakers, Slovaks, hundreds of thousands of Hungarians, some 200,000 Ukrainians and many Poles!
@FRAGIORGIO1, buddy, I live in Vienna, the former imperial capital, I have the remnants of their reign they used to suppress the people right in front of my door and am member of the nation carrying the cultural legacy of that empire. Nations wanted to get out *because* they were suppressed. They had no benefits, only disadvantages, and even we German speaking Austrians drove them away after 1919, 'cause we've had enough of them.
@ThatGuyFromAustria They suppressed a long time ago, but by the early part of the last century there was democracy in Austria under Franz Josef and under Karl I afterwards, but there were many jealousies of ethnic parties and Socialists and Communists who destroyed the dual monarchy and left a power vacuum in Central Europe. If Austrian democracy wasn't what it later became, neither was democracy in the US and the UK. Actually, at the end of the 19th century democracy was growing.
@FRAGIORGIO1, p-l-e-a-s-e stop talking about things you obviously have no clue about. The Habsburgs adhered to the "Gottesgnadentum" (=they considered themselves only responsible to God, and noone else) and were declared enemies of democracy. Our parliament even has its main gates at the backside of the building, because Kaiser Franz Josef didn't want to have to see the MPs when he rode on the Ringstraße, the street before it. I am an Austrian, trust me, the Habsburgs were disliked.
@ThatGuyFromAustria Did you notice what I said about the development of democracy in Austria in the latter half of the 19th century and the first part of the 20th? That should be your history. In the US and the UK in those days women couldn't vote, labor was repressed, ethnic groups also repressed or little cared for (blacks, Indians, Hispanics, Chinese in US; Irish, Scots, and Welsh in UK). What happened to the Republic of Austria after 1918? Combat between militias and Dollfuss.
@FRAGIORGIO1, red Indians were the indigenous population run over by invading whites, the history of Britain is very different from Austria's, and in Austria, no black people were imported for slave labour. I can assure you, from the bottom of my hearth, that you are little smart-alec no-know, YOU DON'T KNOW SHIT ABOUT THESE THINGS, SO STFU, got it? I actually knew and learned from people who were involved in Feb. 19 1934, please shut up, okay?
@ThatGuyFromAustria The reference of Indians in the US (and other minorities & women) and Irish etc. in the UK, is to compare to the struggles of the various ethnic groups within the dual monarchy. The struggles within the Empire/Kingdom, however, were stronger and eventually led to dissolution from within as well as from without. What did that lead to? A power vacuum in Central Europe and the discovery that each new "nation" had minorities within itself. Nazis and Soviets hopped in.
@FRAGIORGIO1, no, no "Nazis and Soviets" "hopped in" after the collapse of the Austrian Empire, DEMOCRACY did, and one of the main reasons for its downfall were the unbearable conditions left by the treaties of Versaille and St. Germain and the economy crisis of 1929, THIS IS IT, I'll block you little idiot now, i've had enough.
Google and Wikipedia are not replacement for knowledge and education. Go play somewhere else.
@ThatGuyFromAustria You have to use insults to avoid any resort to reason and history. After the fall of the Empire, militias of socialists and conservative nationalists and Nazis scuffled in the streets until Engelbert Dollfuss declared a Corporate State to keep the Nazis down. After the Nazis killed him, Schuschnigg took over and lasted about four years till the Nazis absorbed Austria in 1938. The power vacuum let the Nazis seize Czechoslovakia also, and the Soviets in 1945.
@ThatGuyFromAustria Let it be said that Otto von Habsburg-Lothringen (Lorraine) was hated by the Nazis and by the Communists, because he held out the possibility of Central Europe being united against the dictatorships' designs on power there. For years the Archduke was a voice for European unity in the European parliament, and even now, in his 90s, he continues to plead for that cause. He just turned 98 last year, so he is not so active now, but his sons, Archdukes Karl and Gyorgy, are
@FRAGIORGIO1, nope, there is always only ONE thing he always wanted, this is, to restore monarchy to Austria (he still considers himself to have a right to the throne of this country), by which also his engagement for "European unity" is motivated, and because he wants this republic *gone*, no matter how. A united Europe would mean that "his" lands are "together" again, somehow at least. But this just for the record.
@ThatGuyFromAustria Former Habsburg lands would be together again only if the peoples agreed to it. You need to continue your talks about veggans and forget history, if it really interested you.
@ThatGuyFromAustria Unfortunately, the majority of people in Austria still want the country to stay republic despite popular support for the former royal family, according to last year's independent poll. That's what democracy is for.
@DavBlc7, there is no popular support for the Habsburgs in Austria, besides the fact that it would be *imperial* family, not *royal* family. There is only a handful of monarchists, but nothing of influence at all.
Si ce stupide Clémenceau n'avait pas tenu à dépecer l'Empire des Habsbourgs, sous prétexte que c'était le dernier Empire catholique d'Europe, si ce soi-disant grand homme n'avait pas fait passer sa haine envers la religion catholique avant les intérêts de l'Europe, jamais on n'aurait entendu parler d'Hitler.
Well done! Although too short
carlos101879 6 months ago
@radeczek555 - to be honest, habsburg is away since 1918, so whats your problem?
dankwarth 7 months ago
Rest In Peace Prince Otto von Habsburg (1912-2011)
contrerados 7 months ago 3
evidently, to compare that with de burka would be like to compare the occidental wedding dress with the burka. jejeje
The burka search to hide the wemen , to humiliate them to disappear their identity, their human rights , their civils rights etc... only in order to protect one rigth ; the sacred rigth of close their maw.
storicus 9 months ago
It is important to notice that Vienna had its development thanks to the Habsburgs. The people from many parts of the empire came there and culture was promoted, so that Mozart, Beethoven (who had the Archduke Rainier as a friend), Schubert, Strauss Sr and Jr (and brothers),Liszt, and Lehar, among others, flourished here. Interesting to note that Jews like Mahler and Freud were able to work under the Habsburgs. Klimt painted there in the early 20th century. What culture has a republic produced?
FRAGIORGIO1 9 months ago
Prüfungsfrage aus Tourismus: Nennen Sie fünf Museen von Weltrang in Wien, die es auch noch geben würde, wenn Habsburg und sein Hof noch an der Macht wären? Mir sind keine fünf eingefallen. Ist es doch so, dass Österreich die Habsburger nur rausgeschmissen hat, um endlich Geld verdienen zu können.
CruellaBlue 10 months ago
Merci!
luckyowl249 1 year ago
Gloria all'impero austro-ungarico !
donovanmcallister 1 year ago 2
Why is her husband in Madeira and not Vienna?
samk1101 1 year ago
@samk1101 because he died in Madeira in exile. Otto Habsburg have not been allowed transportation of mortal remains to Wien, because citizens of Madeira would be offend.
zlutaopoce 1 year ago
y women cover their faces ?
motamaredah 1 year ago
@motamaredah It's an old tradition for mourning. If you ever saw the photos during the funeral of George VI you would have seen the three queens (Queen Elizabeth II, the queen "mum", and Queen Mary) together in mourning with their heads covered in black veils. Perhaps, it was to keep people from seeing their grief in public, but that is only a possible explanation.
FRAGIORGIO1 9 months ago
@FRAGIORGIO1 I am a Muslim and wear the hijab like them , and I thought that only Muslim women who wear hijab like this Thank you
motamaredah 9 months ago
@motamaredah You are welcome. Respects.
FRAGIORGIO1 9 months ago
@motamaredah
not a hijab - mourning dress that is worn on funerals only
tacotony24 9 months ago
Restore the Monarchy!
BalletBabyBoy 1 year ago 2
La fin de l'empire a été une catastrophe absolue...!!!!
JBLXVI 1 year ago 3
What's the background music played in this video?
doppeldeluxe 1 year ago
Republik weg, Kaisserreich wieder her! Lang lebe unser Kaiser!
Bachtro 1 year ago
It's a good thing this degenerate bunch is gone. They treated their subjects like their personal possession and cared only for themselves or rather: for their power. The curious thing is, had they more cared for the people of the empire, they might have kept their status, but so, history has swept them away.
ThatGuyFromAustria 1 year ago
@ThatGuyFromAustria Well i am glad im from Denmark, still a royal kingdom, not an infernal republic, we do not live in the dust and dirt like you have done since 1918, we still live in the sunlight of a monarchy :) You have a beautifull country but you spot it by beeing a republic now !!!
Vonwar01 1 year ago 3
@Vonwar01, and what did you get out of it? You actually paying a bunch of aristocrats for being there, and maybe supplying the boulevard press with some scandals from time to time? There are cheaper ways of entertainment.
But, isn't Denmark a democracy? (Just-question)
ThatGuyFromAustria 1 year ago
@ThatGuyFromAustria Hey, maybe i was a little harsh on the republic, but as a matter of fact, we have a democracy, but still a constitutional Monarcy which we have been since 1849. I do not see any problem in converting Austria into the same Constitutional Monarchy like us. Maybe it is a little too late, but it is a possibility. Personally i would never be able to respect a President as a sovereign if i had the choice between a President and a Monarch.
Vonwar01 1 year ago 2
@Vonwar01 : I personally prefer a president. They can be elected (and impeached if they turn out foul) whereas monarchs sit on their thrones till they die regardless of being good or bad for their countries. They can't be forced out of office by their subjects. I personally prefer being a citizen to being a subject, being a free man to being a slave of a degenerated royal family!
Liberté, égalité, fraternité! Vive la republique!
HappyDay989 1 year ago
@HappyDay989 : In our country, the Netherlands, Monarchy is embbed by law. If the people decide to abolish our Monarchy, it just needs an amendement on the constitution. In Europe, Monarchies are democratically organized.
optimatus 1 year ago
@HappyDay989 ... like that impeachment thing's worked out so well for all the countries which have ever tried it... let's face it.. to remove someone who's holding an 'elected' office is about as difficult as getting rid of a monarch... at least a monarch is responsible for what he does and doesn't turn around after 8 years and billions of debts and says... Ooopsie... sorry, my bet.. cheers everyone, it's been nice.. send me my pension cheque to my retirement home in Florida...!!
AlexSuchy 1 year ago
@HappyDay989 Presidents in the Parliamentary system are former politicians who are elected by the national parliament after some fighting amongst the parties and are colorless. Royals can be forced out of office as can be seen with Edward VIII, the Duke of Windsor, if we are talking of democratic kingdoms as are those of Europe. Even in republics, most people are more interested in visiting royals bringing commercial and cultural attaches with them. Monarchs are more popular than presidents.
FRAGIORGIO1 9 months ago
@HappyDay989 There is no slavery in a democratic constitutional monarchy, where the monarch is the Head of State and whose powers are delimited by law. You must be thinking back 150 or 250 years. Denmark, Norway, Sweden, the UK, the Netherlands, Belgium, Spain are monarchies and solid democracies. Come up to date. Remember what happened to the Republique Revolutionaire of 1794?
FRAGIORGIO1 9 months ago
@ThatGuyFromAustria Since the 5. June 1849 Denmark has been a constitutional Monarchy, which has had more or less free elections since this date. (reason for writing more or less is that women did not have the right to vote from the start, ppl that did not own their own home did not etc.)
I do not feel entertained by the royals, they are to me an honourable and honest representative of my country, they are it for life not for 4 or 7-8 years only.!
Vonwar01 1 year ago
@ThatGuyFromAustria They don't pay a "bunch of aristocrats". The Queen of Denmark is the Head of State, as are other monarchs, and the immediate members of the Royal Family, with their long historic ties to that noble country, bring a personal touch to the lives and events of the citizens. The Head of State of Austria is a President, but how much of a personal touch does he bring? Not much, I would say. Presidents come and go almost without a ripple.
FRAGIORGIO1 9 months ago
@FRAGIORGIO1, please, PLEASE stop it you little idiot. I don't want to block you, but your display of lack of historical and political understanding is painful. Please go back to primary school and learn about the political functions of kings, presidents, et cetera. You're like somebody who can't even count 2 and 2 together wants do debate differential equations.
ThatGuyFromAustria 9 months ago
@ThatGuyFromAustria You apparently cover up your ignorance of governmental institutions and history by your call to block me from your site. Little that bothers me. The President of Austria is the Chief of State and the Kanzler is the Prime Minister and head of government. That system prevails also in Germany and Italy. In the constitutional monarchies of Europe, the Head of State is the monarch, and the political head is generally called the Prime Minister. Absolute monarchy is different
FRAGIORGIO1 9 months ago
@ThatGuyFromAustria What do you know of Taafe's administration in Austria or of Andrassy in Hungary? What about the development of Christian Socialism and Social Democracy in Austria in the last quarter of the 19th century? Did you know Franz Josef accepted and even pushed universal suffrage early in the 20th century? Did you know of the passing of civil marriage and secular education in the 1860s? I'm not talking Veggans.
FRAGIORGIO1 9 months ago
@ThatGuyFromAustria Well maybe they did so in Austria-Hungary, but NOT in Denmark, therefore we have a constitutional Monarchy with more than 90% support in the population.
Vonwar01 1 year ago
@ThatGuyFromAustria You are ignorant of the facts of history. Kaiser Franz I was very popular in the early 1800s and Franz Josef got that way later in his reign. The problem was the beginning of cries for independence from many ethnic groups that were actually mixed themselves and were encouraged by Wilson and enemies of unity. Czechoslovakia, for example had Czechs, millions of German speakers, Slovaks, hundreds of thousands of Hungarians, some 200,000 Ukrainians and many Poles!
FRAGIORGIO1 9 months ago
@FRAGIORGIO1, buddy, I live in Vienna, the former imperial capital, I have the remnants of their reign they used to suppress the people right in front of my door and am member of the nation carrying the cultural legacy of that empire. Nations wanted to get out *because* they were suppressed. They had no benefits, only disadvantages, and even we German speaking Austrians drove them away after 1919, 'cause we've had enough of them.
ThatGuyFromAustria 9 months ago
@ThatGuyFromAustria They suppressed a long time ago, but by the early part of the last century there was democracy in Austria under Franz Josef and under Karl I afterwards, but there were many jealousies of ethnic parties and Socialists and Communists who destroyed the dual monarchy and left a power vacuum in Central Europe. If Austrian democracy wasn't what it later became, neither was democracy in the US and the UK. Actually, at the end of the 19th century democracy was growing.
FRAGIORGIO1 9 months ago
@FRAGIORGIO1, p-l-e-a-s-e stop talking about things you obviously have no clue about. The Habsburgs adhered to the "Gottesgnadentum" (=they considered themselves only responsible to God, and noone else) and were declared enemies of democracy. Our parliament even has its main gates at the backside of the building, because Kaiser Franz Josef didn't want to have to see the MPs when he rode on the Ringstraße, the street before it. I am an Austrian, trust me, the Habsburgs were disliked.
ThatGuyFromAustria 9 months ago
@ThatGuyFromAustria Did you notice what I said about the development of democracy in Austria in the latter half of the 19th century and the first part of the 20th? That should be your history. In the US and the UK in those days women couldn't vote, labor was repressed, ethnic groups also repressed or little cared for (blacks, Indians, Hispanics, Chinese in US; Irish, Scots, and Welsh in UK). What happened to the Republic of Austria after 1918? Combat between militias and Dollfuss.
FRAGIORGIO1 9 months ago
@FRAGIORGIO1, red Indians were the indigenous population run over by invading whites, the history of Britain is very different from Austria's, and in Austria, no black people were imported for slave labour. I can assure you, from the bottom of my hearth, that you are little smart-alec no-know, YOU DON'T KNOW SHIT ABOUT THESE THINGS, SO STFU, got it? I actually knew and learned from people who were involved in Feb. 19 1934, please shut up, okay?
ThatGuyFromAustria 9 months ago
@ThatGuyFromAustria The reference of Indians in the US (and other minorities & women) and Irish etc. in the UK, is to compare to the struggles of the various ethnic groups within the dual monarchy. The struggles within the Empire/Kingdom, however, were stronger and eventually led to dissolution from within as well as from without. What did that lead to? A power vacuum in Central Europe and the discovery that each new "nation" had minorities within itself. Nazis and Soviets hopped in.
FRAGIORGIO1 9 months ago
@FRAGIORGIO1, no, no "Nazis and Soviets" "hopped in" after the collapse of the Austrian Empire, DEMOCRACY did, and one of the main reasons for its downfall were the unbearable conditions left by the treaties of Versaille and St. Germain and the economy crisis of 1929, THIS IS IT, I'll block you little idiot now, i've had enough.
Google and Wikipedia are not replacement for knowledge and education. Go play somewhere else.
ThatGuyFromAustria 9 months ago
@ThatGuyFromAustria You have to use insults to avoid any resort to reason and history. After the fall of the Empire, militias of socialists and conservative nationalists and Nazis scuffled in the streets until Engelbert Dollfuss declared a Corporate State to keep the Nazis down. After the Nazis killed him, Schuschnigg took over and lasted about four years till the Nazis absorbed Austria in 1938. The power vacuum let the Nazis seize Czechoslovakia also, and the Soviets in 1945.
FRAGIORGIO1 9 months ago
@ThatGuyFromAustria Let it be said that Otto von Habsburg-Lothringen (Lorraine) was hated by the Nazis and by the Communists, because he held out the possibility of Central Europe being united against the dictatorships' designs on power there. For years the Archduke was a voice for European unity in the European parliament, and even now, in his 90s, he continues to plead for that cause. He just turned 98 last year, so he is not so active now, but his sons, Archdukes Karl and Gyorgy, are
FRAGIORGIO1 9 months ago
@FRAGIORGIO1, nope, there is always only ONE thing he always wanted, this is, to restore monarchy to Austria (he still considers himself to have a right to the throne of this country), by which also his engagement for "European unity" is motivated, and because he wants this republic *gone*, no matter how. A united Europe would mean that "his" lands are "together" again, somehow at least. But this just for the record.
ThatGuyFromAustria 9 months ago
@ThatGuyFromAustria Former Habsburg lands would be together again only if the peoples agreed to it. You need to continue your talks about veggans and forget history, if it really interested you.
FRAGIORGIO1 9 months ago
@ThatGuyFromAustria Unfortunately, the majority of people in Austria still want the country to stay republic despite popular support for the former royal family, according to last year's independent poll. That's what democracy is for.
DavBlc7 7 months ago
@DavBlc7, there is no popular support for the Habsburgs in Austria, besides the fact that it would be *imperial* family, not *royal* family. There is only a handful of monarchists, but nothing of influence at all.
ThatGuyFromAustria 7 months ago
Si ce stupide Clémenceau n'avait pas tenu à dépecer l'Empire des Habsbourgs, sous prétexte que c'était le dernier Empire catholique d'Europe, si ce soi-disant grand homme n'avait pas fait passer sa haine envers la religion catholique avant les intérêts de l'Europe, jamais on n'aurait entendu parler d'Hitler.
olibxl 1 year ago
Die letzte richtige Kaiserin war Elisabeth
TheBellaMasen 1 year ago
@TheBellaMasen was verstehen Sie unter einer "richtigen" Kaiserin?
1durchlaucht 1 year ago
C'était la plus grande des familles royales qui a tout perdu à cause de la république autrichienne!
iphygenie80 2 years ago
thanks
danich45 2 years ago
lange lebe die republik. rip zita.
kralle7611 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Ruhe in Frieden
Ein ruff in den Himmel...........
Habsburger ihr habt uns Donauschwaben verraten und verkauft, vielen Dank dafür !
Von einer Grand Famille Imperial kann keine rede sein.......Sory
Polkakeenich 2 years ago
pietätloses verräterisches Subjekt
1durchlaucht 2 years ago
RIP from hungary
Monarchy!!! AGAIN!!! Austro-Hungary!!!!
1867-1918
autokolcsonzes 2 years ago 32
Requiescat in pace! In memoria aeterna erit justa.
IustitiaPax 2 years ago 6
tiré des "Aigles foudroyés" commenté par Frédéric Mitterrand
bzhseat 2 years ago
¡VIVA UNSER KAISER OTTO! Jamas ententederé a los republicanos con su falta de humildad. Todos iguales, bien...pero primus inter peres.
grafvondritten 3 years ago 6
Muchas gracias, es una joya de coleccion. saludos
rayito2005 3 years ago
Merci beaucoup pour le Video.
J'aime les Habsburgs! Grand Famille Imperial!
Les Autrichiens devons restaurer leur Monarchie.
Jame243 3 years ago 17