Added: 2 years ago
From: barbbiggs
Views: 1,358
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (27)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Why does Rebecca Black gets millions of views for a crap song and this one gets only 1,196 views after 2 years? Do we really sweep issues like these under the carpet. Why do parents get penalised when they raised concerns about abuse? Why do victims of crime copped it sweet and we place the blame on them (and give them the guilty feelings.) Why do the abusers have no guilty feelings and think that they are such great people?

  • This is a special report on NightLife, ABC Radio (Sydney, Australia, 702 BL).

    "Does Family Law Look After Children?"

    slashslashmpegmediadotabcdotne­tdotauslashlocalslashnightlife­slashnightlife_m2002486dotmp3 takes you direct to the audio clip

  • Barbara, are you still involved in this field? Is it safe to be involved in this field. The lady speaking on the Nightlife program on ABC Radio is Freda Biggs, she shares the same surname as you.

    wwwdotabcdotnetdotauslashnight­lifeslash

    Decode the above link to find the audio link

  • This is a special report on NightLife, ABC Radio (Sydney, Australia, 702 BL).

    "Does Family Law Look After Children?"

    You only have 5 days until next week program overwrites this link.

    Youtube is not letting me paste the link, so look for Nightlife, ABC website.

  • thank god for strong courages women willing to take a stand

  • You are free to use the video for any purpose you like but I don't know how you can copy it. Barbara Biggs. Pleased to say that legislative changes brought about, by our efforts and others, now mean child safety comes before a child's right to a relationship with both parents - even if one is an abuser. Parents will not be penalised by raising violence concerns and domestic violence now includes such things as emotional violence, witnessing violence and neglect.

  • I would like to use this video in a court point, How do i copy this?

  • What this 'vested interests don't what you to know is that domestic violence perpetrated against the mother which automatically wins sole custody in around a whopping 90 percent of cases is the rare exception Not the Rule. It is easy to say that violence against women is an out of control problem when you are making money hand over fist from such propaganda!

  • Comment removed

  • Eight months later, this video only has 620 views. I wish ABC News, SMH, The Age, etc puts up a link to this YouTube video. Why is easier for cowards to blame the mums than to face the abusers. I can understand why the rest of society can not challenge abusers. Our Society is full of cowards. No wonder Family Court can get away with what they do. No wonder only the brave are left behind to pick up the pieces and face possible assault themselves. These abusers have free reign to dance joyfully.

  • More data was released today: x amount of children abused, x amount of 'parents' not capable of caring for their children. Many politicians making statements of how shameful child abuse is. No one makes a challenging statement against the Family Court. All the hard work like videos like these has again fallen on deaf ears. I can't quote actually numbers because one child abused is too many. x amount of children is just disgraceful. No one has the right to challenge abusers and to take them down.

  • These issues need more public and court focus! More focus is being given to the issue of fathers claiming they are being deprived of time with their children. Both issues need to be addressed publicly which cannot be done with the current court secrecy.

  • I witness a court case where a hot shot lawyer ripped apart a young mum. The police charge this fuckwit with assault to the mum and the baby and malicious damage. The lawyer torn apart the mum. Thankfully the fuckwit was found guilty but he only got a two year good behaviour bond. The young mum was only relieved that it was all over. I would have given Hanging or a bullet. His death will benefit society. Now this fuckwit will get his mates to terrorise the young mum and her kids.

  • We've all been told the children will come back in the end but it's something we already know. The best interest in the children is in not living with Domestic Violence and not accepting it as a part of life. The best interest in the Family Court is in not branding a parent that may speak out with a diagnosis that fits with the Family Court because those parents only get stronger and learn to speak out when they find others in the same predicament. The information age is fantastic.

  • The current Family Law Court System we have in Australia is a massive shame on our nation.

    It is abusive, contradictory, and disgraceful.

    No mother-child relationship should be forcibly separated against their will. It is unjust to do so, and extremely emotionally and psychollogically damaging to both the mother and the child.

    Yet this is what our system calls 'in the child's best interests'.

    What right does a 'stranger' have to determine what is 'best' for a child they don't even know?

  • @wedontgetsafe What about father-child relationships? You seem to not care what happens there? But I suppose in your opinion men/fathers aren't as important.

  • What? Only 232 views. Although I really support this campaign, Barbara, this needs more exposure. Yes, there was n article in The Sydney Morning Herald on Sat 2 May. But this needs more coverage. It would be nice if two million Australians saw this. It would be great if many people decided to hunt down child abusers. Maybe we should even legalise vigilantes. Why is this abuse not being dealt with. If we had 10 bank robberies each day, police will do anything to stop it. What about children????

  • 64 yrs ago my mother begged the courts help to save a badly beaten baby often hospitilised due to my fathers drunken violence.The court decided it was in my best interest for the beatings to continue & they did. I see nothing has changed. Sadly children are still at the mercy of well meaning fools who base reality on pages of books. How many scars,deaths, lives wrecked by fear must be endured before our SUPOSED protectors stop this & say enough. Yes Im Angry, but I lived,so many havent.

  • @jimboc44 What a biased piece of crap this vid is. And your comment just goes to show you say "The court decided it was in my best interest for the beatings to continue"???

    That is such an unrealistic comment to make. No court would would decide something like that!

    They might doubt claims that are made, but it is bullshit to say they intentionally dont care about violence in the family.

    Too often women use the real suffering of some to further their own selfish motives.

  • It is silencing the voices of those who most need to be heard. It is the voice of my son, Nathan and it demands justice, transparency and accountability & for all our children whom are lost within such an imperfect system & a constant system that is failing & costing us the lives of our children,the best part of who we are & our future and all that entails.

    Michelle Stewart & Nathan Stewart

  • Section 534 of the Children, Youth and Families Act 2005 protects the wrongdoer,restricts any publication even in such a travisty & in public interest.

    where the wrongdoer is the Department. Why is our government less

    accountable than the ordinary citizen? It leaves the Department in a position where they are better protected from criticism where a child dies than they would be if a child was injured whilst in care.

  • This also applis in The Childrens Court System as well.

    Yet the system is shrouded in secrecy. DHS , is immune from liability even though while standing in the place of a parent, they allow a child to suffer abuse at the hands of a carer and pay the ultimate price,there is no pirce higher that I know of, than the life of a childs and all that should entail to be cut short through such failing's and THOSE AT THE HANDS OF OUR GOVERNEMNT DEPARTMENTS & COURT SYSTEMS:

  • I once help someone raise an AVO, wasted time in court, only to have her oldest son betray us. He will grow up to be an abusive dad as well, despite copping the most "discipline". I have seen other friends waste their time in court. After wasting time trying to set a good example by proving that the law works, it would have been easier for me to bash this f@%wit up. Abusive f#$@s only understand violence as communication.

  • This cycles teaches girls to choose abusive bfs/husbands; boys to act out like their dads so that they think they have some control. We should remove the father from existence because so much damage has been done. I hate how these dads are "such good blokes" outside that they can manipulate everything in their favour. I hate this honeymoon-tension-violence-for­giveness-honeymoon-etc. No wonder women can't break out of this cycle, they hope that honeymoon could last forever.

  • I absolutely HATE violent and abusive fathers. They bash their partners, make their children addicted to their violence. Bride them during the "honeymoon period". Play the victim when outside forces raise questions. Have absolute control over children, so the children tries to seek some form of approval even though their dads are f@#$@#@. Even when children say no, their voices are ignored and they are exposed to more abuse.

  • It is incredible the way these court judges think, but if you research, you will learn where the conditioning of patriarchal judges is coming from.

    Court officers are too scared to challenge the abusers.

    Many abusers are psychopaths and can play the victim role so very well.

    As a professional, I was horrified to learn the truth of what goes on in secret courts.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more