@SuperPatrick777 Not really, I don't consider the Bible to be proof for God any more than I consider Harry Potter to be proof for magic. When I you to prove it I meant actual scientific evidence.
@SuperPatrick777 I read it several times. I asked for actual scientific evidence to support your claim and all you said was "the laws of information , agency." That isn't a coherent response.
@tsimon1234 what do you mean by" science " [ in a test tube ] , all information origiates from a mind , an agent no exceptions ,same with life , chance cannot do anything .
@SuperPatrick777 By "scientific evidence" I meant something along the lines of The Bible describing the composition of a Hydrogen Atom. Such a thing could not have been known by the desert tribesmen who wrote the Bible and thus they must have got it from a being of higher intelligence. This would at least support the idea that the Bible comes from a higher power. And no, not all information originates from "a mind". Watch some videos by DonExodus2, CDK007 and c0nc0rdance to see what I mean.
@tsimon1234 well the word science means knowlege , , and why God would explain the workings of an atom to his people , you have to remember that God is a personal God and speaks in personal terms , the bible certainly speaks quite a lot on the workings of nature but it uses presonal language not scientific jargon , as for your last statement you have to elaberate yourself on that , in laymans terms please
@SuperPatrick777 The word "Science" does not mean "knowledge". "why God would explain the workings of an atom to his people" To prove, in thousands of years time, that he did indeed write the Bible. Seeing as he is omniscient God would have known that people would not believe in him and thus he should have provided sufficient evidence to believe. EG: Concrete scientific knowledge that could not have been known by the people who wrote the Bible without him telling them.
@tsimon1234 i will try not to laugh at your first statement and carry on , anyway your second statement is a bit vague , the bible is the inspired word of God " all scripture is God breathed " , in truth people suppress the truth [ as romans one says ] , so people will just plain refuse to believe " the fool in his SAID in his HEART there is NO God " , this is a moral problem not an interlectual one [ attitude ] ," evolution " well i new that had to come in to it ,that is nothing short tbc
DonExodus2, CDK007 and c0nc0rdance are all Youtubers who have made videos explaining how information can be created by a non-intelligent process. IE: Evolution.
Nice trousers, Sir Patrick. Lovely comments.
sirtinycreep 3 months ago
unfortunally he is very likely to be in hell now
SuperPatrick777 1 year ago
@SuperPatrick777 How so?
tsimon1234 1 year ago
@tsimon1234 somebody who regects God ends up in hell , it is a pity he did not visulise that !!
SuperPatrick777 1 year ago
@SuperPatrick777 Can you prove any of that?
tsimon1234 1 year ago
@tsimon1234 you want a long debate on the bible ?
SuperPatrick777 1 year ago
@SuperPatrick777 Not really, I don't consider the Bible to be proof for God any more than I consider Harry Potter to be proof for magic. When I you to prove it I meant actual scientific evidence.
tsimon1234 1 year ago
@tsimon1234 the laws of infomation , agency .
SuperPatrick777 1 year ago
@SuperPatrick777 I'm sorry, what?
tsimon1234 1 year ago
@tsimon1234 don't be just read it again .
SuperPatrick777 1 year ago
@SuperPatrick777 I read it several times. I asked for actual scientific evidence to support your claim and all you said was "the laws of information , agency." That isn't a coherent response.
tsimon1234 1 year ago
@tsimon1234 what do you mean by" science " [ in a test tube ] , all information origiates from a mind , an agent no exceptions ,same with life , chance cannot do anything .
SuperPatrick777 11 months ago
@SuperPatrick777 By "scientific evidence" I meant something along the lines of The Bible describing the composition of a Hydrogen Atom. Such a thing could not have been known by the desert tribesmen who wrote the Bible and thus they must have got it from a being of higher intelligence. This would at least support the idea that the Bible comes from a higher power. And no, not all information originates from "a mind". Watch some videos by DonExodus2, CDK007 and c0nc0rdance to see what I mean.
tsimon1234 11 months ago
@tsimon1234 well the word science means knowlege , , and why God would explain the workings of an atom to his people , you have to remember that God is a personal God and speaks in personal terms , the bible certainly speaks quite a lot on the workings of nature but it uses presonal language not scientific jargon , as for your last statement you have to elaberate yourself on that , in laymans terms please
SuperPatrick777 11 months ago
@SuperPatrick777 The word "Science" does not mean "knowledge". "why God would explain the workings of an atom to his people" To prove, in thousands of years time, that he did indeed write the Bible. Seeing as he is omniscient God would have known that people would not believe in him and thus he should have provided sufficient evidence to believe. EG: Concrete scientific knowledge that could not have been known by the people who wrote the Bible without him telling them.
tsimon1234 11 months ago
@tsimon1234 i will try not to laugh at your first statement and carry on , anyway your second statement is a bit vague , the bible is the inspired word of God " all scripture is God breathed " , in truth people suppress the truth [ as romans one says ] , so people will just plain refuse to believe " the fool in his SAID in his HEART there is NO God " , this is a moral problem not an interlectual one [ attitude ] ," evolution " well i new that had to come in to it ,that is nothing short tbc
SuperPatrick777 11 months ago
@tsimon1234 con't of psudoscience built on a false world view , it bears no relationship to reality what so ever .
SuperPatrick777 11 months ago
DonExodus2, CDK007 and c0nc0rdance are all Youtubers who have made videos explaining how information can be created by a non-intelligent process. IE: Evolution.
tsimon1234 11 months ago