sportsfag, you hypocrite, you talk bad about the constitution cause they had slaves even though it was probably your ancestors (the redneck south) that wanted them more than the north. What exactly are you trying to prove by insulting the constitution? That it's okay when King George Bush ignores or changes it? When he makes a slave out of you? 50 percent of your income goes to the gov't you idiot, at least wake up and get angry at them, not us. Fool.
To add on that he seems to not know much about the founding fathers. History is not as black & white as he thinks. Many of them laid the foundation for the slaves to be ultimately free'd. There are many writings of them speaking out against slavery. Washington free'd his slaves in his will. He couldn't free them while alive because they believed in the idea of property rights (Human Rights & Political rights were seen seperately) some slaves belonged to his wife. It was indeed a different time.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Glad you brought up the constitution..You know all those white guys had lots of time on their hands to play with that document because they had them slaves doing all their work for them..They weren't wild about women either unless it was in the kitchen or bedroom
Bible basically says the same things. With our new enlightened knowledge we should push for more freedoms, not more socialism. Unless you like being a slave...
True they had slaves, but they were not inconsistent with their message when you put into context that Africans were not considered men in the colloquial sense, but less evolved, and practically a different specie. Granted IN THIS DAY AND AGE, we would find those ideas reprehensible and detestable, but if you lived in that era, the thought may have never occurred to you.
Shall I guess you're in the camp that thinks the Civil War was necessary to free slaves in the South?
I wasn't alive during the civil war and neither were you, so we have no idea, all we can do is speculate...I'm 99.9% sure I would have opposed slavery..treating people like animals would not have ever seemed good to me
I can speculate based on evidence that every other industrialized society abolished slavery without a war that killed 600,000. But that's neither here nor there.
Its easy to say you would have opposed slavery, isn't it. Makes you feel all warm and fuzzy inside, I'm sure. The truth is that you can't honestly say what your common assumptions would have been back then, because NOW you have the benefit of an extra 250 years of progressive thought. They didn't.
Doesn't matter what other countries did, this was our unique problem..And I would have thought beating the shit out of people was wrong at anytime. You honestly believe you ever would have thought slavery was OK ? That's astonishing
You make the mistake of putting your current self, your experiences, and the teachings of the last 250 years into a different era.
Of course if I transplanted my current self into 1770, I would advocate against slavery, and I would be one of a fraction of a fraction of people who could make that argument, BUT if I had grown up with it as an accepted practice, would I have accepted it too? Probably.
In 1980 you would have probably thought only gay people and drug users could contract AIDS.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I agree, paul is indeed a very sad old man..probably more sad now that his campaign was laughed off by the voters..Tell me though pumpkin, you going to tell your mommy on me too ??
sportstar69 - You really do need to get a life. All you do is hang around videos of Dr Paul on youtube, casting aspersions on a great man, and trying to incite trouble. 493 videos watched in four days of account creation. 123 per day. How many accounts have you had closed down previously?
Are you are paid troublemaker?
Or did Dr Paul deliver you, and drop you on your head?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
You folks dom't have an idea based in reality..."I" did not watch 493 videos...that's my little grandson watching nursery rhymes and my 3 others watching music videos .You must be a Paultard though, because you certainly have the paranoia for it
Six hours of youtube vids per day...on top of your own prolific, no-life posting?
Like I said, get a life. Good to see the seed doesn't fall far from the tree, either, and your spawn will end up brain-dead from watching so much crap.
The guy spends >6 hours per day on Youtube, from what I can see it's all hanging around Ron Paul videos criticizing him and his supporters. His entire profile is an omage to hatred of Ron Paul and his supporters. Yes, I think that's worthy of a "get a life" comment.
Why am I here? To hear what the greatest man in America has to say.
Go Ron!!!!
wbhopper 2 years ago
haha! on KET :-S
Davey52Poremba 2 years ago
5*****'s!
Thank you! :)
badfinger111 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
My county is being taken over by Ron Paul PCOs.
theropingeffect 3 years ago
Truly Hope for America
wildflower420 3 years ago 9
As always, Ron Paul is the SHIT!
TBRambo 3 years ago 6
thanks for the videos!
CrazyCurtisLow 3 years ago 6
RON PAUL ONLY HOPE!!! ronpaul2008 . com
RON PAUL RON PAUL MAKE LOVE NOT WAR !!!!!!
BUSH, McCAIN ONLY WAR IN BRAIN!!!! ronpaul2008 . com
LET'S STOP RECESSION ONLY HOPE IS RON PAUL!!!! DONATE DONATE DONATE !!!!! ronpaul2008 . com
START IT TODAY Buy "The Revolution: A Manifesto" by Ron Paul dvds4delegates . com Donate donate
SaveUsRonPaul 3 years ago 3
ron paul is an idea
blargen3141 3 years ago
Thats all the media would like to let him be
tnichols321 3 years ago 2
sportsfag, you hypocrite, you talk bad about the constitution cause they had slaves even though it was probably your ancestors (the redneck south) that wanted them more than the north. What exactly are you trying to prove by insulting the constitution? That it's okay when King George Bush ignores or changes it? When he makes a slave out of you? 50 percent of your income goes to the gov't you idiot, at least wake up and get angry at them, not us. Fool.
filosophia22 3 years ago 4
To add on that he seems to not know much about the founding fathers. History is not as black & white as he thinks. Many of them laid the foundation for the slaves to be ultimately free'd. There are many writings of them speaking out against slavery. Washington free'd his slaves in his will. He couldn't free them while alive because they believed in the idea of property rights (Human Rights & Political rights were seen seperately) some slaves belonged to his wife. It was indeed a different time.
Seiku 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Dr Nut lost, whatever he says is irrelevant
sportsstar69 3 years ago
You are so funny. You think it is cool to support the demise of this country. You go support McMoron of Obama (there is little difference).
You can say you won! You supported the destruction of the Constitution! Go You!
matrixxx123456789 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Glad you brought up the constitution..You know all those white guys had lots of time on their hands to play with that document because they had them slaves doing all their work for them..They weren't wild about women either unless it was in the kitchen or bedroom
sportsstar69 3 years ago
Bible basically says the same things. With our new enlightened knowledge we should push for more freedoms, not more socialism. Unless you like being a slave...
timedilations 3 years ago
Agreed, bible is a POS also
sportsstar69 3 years ago
True they had slaves, but they were not inconsistent with their message when you put into context that Africans were not considered men in the colloquial sense, but less evolved, and practically a different specie. Granted IN THIS DAY AND AGE, we would find those ideas reprehensible and detestable, but if you lived in that era, the thought may have never occurred to you.
Shall I guess you're in the camp that thinks the Civil War was necessary to free slaves in the South?
immanent 3 years ago
I wasn't alive during the civil war and neither were you, so we have no idea, all we can do is speculate...I'm 99.9% sure I would have opposed slavery..treating people like animals would not have ever seemed good to me
sportsstar69 3 years ago
I can speculate based on evidence that every other industrialized society abolished slavery without a war that killed 600,000. But that's neither here nor there.
Its easy to say you would have opposed slavery, isn't it. Makes you feel all warm and fuzzy inside, I'm sure. The truth is that you can't honestly say what your common assumptions would have been back then, because NOW you have the benefit of an extra 250 years of progressive thought. They didn't.
immanent 3 years ago
Doesn't matter what other countries did, this was our unique problem..And I would have thought beating the shit out of people was wrong at anytime. You honestly believe you ever would have thought slavery was OK ? That's astonishing
sportsstar69 3 years ago
You make the mistake of putting your current self, your experiences, and the teachings of the last 250 years into a different era.
Of course if I transplanted my current self into 1770, I would advocate against slavery, and I would be one of a fraction of a fraction of people who could make that argument, BUT if I had grown up with it as an accepted practice, would I have accepted it too? Probably.
In 1980 you would have probably thought only gay people and drug users could contract AIDS.
immanent 3 years ago
Hi Guys!!! sportsstar69 doing this bad silly comments almost every Ron Paul videos and thinking what is wrong with him !!!!! very sad old man!!!!
lovengive 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I agree, paul is indeed a very sad old man..probably more sad now that his campaign was laughed off by the voters..Tell me though pumpkin, you going to tell your mommy on me too ??
sportsstar69 3 years ago
You really have no life.
kevlarthehorribleone 3 years ago
sportstar69 - You really do need to get a life. All you do is hang around videos of Dr Paul on youtube, casting aspersions on a great man, and trying to incite trouble. 493 videos watched in four days of account creation. 123 per day. How many accounts have you had closed down previously?
Are you are paid troublemaker?
Or did Dr Paul deliver you, and drop you on your head?
lastnymleft 3 years ago 7
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You folks dom't have an idea based in reality..."I" did not watch 493 videos...that's my little grandson watching nursery rhymes and my 3 others watching music videos .You must be a Paultard though, because you certainly have the paranoia for it
sportsstar69 3 years ago
Six hours of youtube vids per day...on top of your own prolific, no-life posting?
Like I said, get a life. Good to see the seed doesn't fall far from the tree, either, and your spawn will end up brain-dead from watching so much crap.
lastnymleft 3 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
oh the humanity, that's a little over an hour a piece for each one of us or an average of 6-10 videos each..Oh my god we're hooked
sportsstar69 3 years ago
You say get a life online. Why are you here?
ineptgod 3 years ago
The guy spends >6 hours per day on Youtube, from what I can see it's all hanging around Ron Paul videos criticizing him and his supporters. His entire profile is an omage to hatred of Ron Paul and his supporters. Yes, I think that's worthy of a "get a life" comment.
Why am I here? To hear what the greatest man in America has to say.
lastnymleft 3 years ago 15
sorry misfired carry on then
ineptgod 3 years ago
The bastards win before the ballot boxes are filled.
ENABLERart 3 years ago 5
America has lost because this man isnt going to be president. LIberty forever.
God bless Ron Paul
fearonism 3 years ago 7
Truly awesome! Thank You.
haskellfilmz 3 years ago 6