Added: 5 years ago
From: n204u
Views: 2,197,219
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (3,443)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • >Doing this in Battlefield 3

    FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU-

  • America DIDN'T copy the YAK-141, Russian designers SOLD the plans and schematics to the USA because they didn't have the funds to continue the project. All you people saying the F-35 is a copy are of low iq. If you actually STUDY aerospace engineering or are plane enthusiast then you would know.

  • Dear Santa...

  • so now we need to replace the Apache?

    Abrahams, A-10, Apaches and Spectres is all thats really needed on the battlefield. Now if we could just revive the APC and retrofit them.

  • Now fighter jets can visit my sons school!! How much??

  • wat a plane !!!

  • How much is this bad boy? Gun and butter people, gun and butter..

  • I do not care what you say, that's still bad ass

  • The amazing power of kerosene...

  • OMG

  • Oz will regret buying these we should have waited for the stolen copy F22 China is making a lot cheaper & buy some of the copy 69 Patriot missles that Isreal sent to China with the change left over.Seems unfair US taxpayers pay for development costs their good friend Israel sells design to China? It appears China got their advanced sub design using German technology thanks to Israel.

  • @rag5206

    Israel didn't send anything to China. Germans messed up their paperwork and the ships crew didn't store explosives safely enough.

  • @MokomaSusi Yes & Santa Claus is true why were the missles & explosives labelled Fireworks & incorrectly/unsafely, stowed/labelled carried on a Flag of Convience ship? Finland caught them out & the Zonists told the Finns to Shut Up & help cover up. Israel has been caught selling Western/US secrets to China & Israel stole uranium from the US in the 50's & 60's.Germans are smart people they DON'T make mistakes like this it sounds like Finland is involved in cover up.

  • @rag5206

    "Zionist" told our goverment to shut up... do you have any evidence to back up this sort of claim? I would certainly like to see it.

  • @MokomaSusi Theres heaps of evidence of Israels deception of US. Johnathon Pollard theft of 360cubic ft of Classified Secret for Israel & spy.Ben-ami-Kadiish.The US investigators where treated like crims when they travelled to Israel & denigned the promised co-operation.Also read Israels responses to Kennedy regarding Dimona as published in NY Times. .Ariel Sharon said We the Jewish People Control American & the Americans Know it, Attack on USS Liberty wasn't a mistake as claimed by Israel

  • @rag5206

    So where is the evidence that "zionist" are controlling Finnish goverment?

  • @MokomaSusi U know the zonist control Finnish media because they control the banks world wide.Zonist media magnet Robert Maxwell was one example even Rupert Murdoch has to borrow from zonists bankers so he runs pro israel stories.Read the book Profits of War by ex Mossad agent Ari Ben-Menashe he was buying AK47 & Silkworm missles from Nth Korea & selling them to Iran, Israel's sworn enemy! The attack on USS Liberty by iseael goes to show u cant trust them. Let me guess your Jewish?

  • @rag5206 "Oz will regret buying these we should have waited for the stolen copy F22"

    You would be waiting forever then, China have their prototype stealth aircraft and its not even close to the F-22.

    If China had aircraft designs and even an aircraft to reverse engineer, they wouldn't be able to do it. The real secrets are not in the aircraft itself but in the high precision equipment used to make it. It's be like handing an iphone to a caveman and saying "make that!".

  • @FXWorldBeater Gen MacArthur said the Chinese army cant fight boy he was wrong,the British said Jap planes r rubbish & their solidiers are night blind & cant fight.China has an advanced space program its students r stealing technology from Universities around the world was it the Iranians or Chinese experts who brought the drone down?China will be overtaking US economy 15 before projected. Dont under estimate your enemy learn from history my young friend

  • @rag5206 "China has an advanced space program"

    Yeah I heard they put a man into space last year ... cool, I believe we did that 50 years ago.

    "China will be overtaking US economy 15 before projected"

    Only as long as we allow it. China's economy survives 100% on western tolerance. Once the decision is made to ditch chinese manufacturing to recover western economies, it will fall back to poverty (worse than before) within 2 years.

  • @FXWorldBeater Yes using a WW2 Super V2 Redstone designed by Von Braun's german design team.We give China paper money or our food/resourses/land & they give us manufactured products.I suggest you visit China the factories are everywhere plus u can catch a late nite train & not be mugged or hassled by druggies.Their economic/industrial achievements in a short time r incredible like it or not they will be No.1 soon to be followed by India as No. 2

  • @FXWorldBeater I am not being a smart arse but I just read China is launching 30 satellites in 2012 plus a docking of two space craft. The West better pull its socks up FAST especially debt ridden Europe. The ASEAN countries r considering dumping US dollar for the Yuan. As Napoleon said "dont wake the Dragon"

  • @rag5206 China will never do anything to hurt the US dollar. It would hurt them the most.

  • @OlderG0ds Its not just China the ASEAN countries,China,India,Russia want to move away from using US$ as World's Reserve Currency especially for oil purchases Saddam & Gaddafi didn't 2 be paid in US$ & looked what happened.This is just a changing of the guard & decline of Empire it happened to England Pound Sterling was reserve currency till circa 1945.The Drachma/Aureus/Solidus & Dinar were considered world currency until their Empires ended. China's major trade partner is EU not US

  • @rag5206 I guess you're right. All I have to say is to the next guy thinking of trying to fuck the US economy... look at Saddam and think again.

  • @rag5206 China's trade with the entire EU is far less then with the US...over 300 billion a year with the US and less then 150 billion with the entire EU. Also China holds almost its entire reserve currency in US dollars...if the dollar drops so does most of China's holdings. It makes sense..1 Chinese yuan = 15 cents in the US. For the forseeable future there is no alternative to the US dollar as the worlds reserve currency.

  • @rag5206 "Gen MacArthur said the Chinese army cant fight boy he was wrong"

    Given that they were rolled by the Japanese and we in turn crushed the Japanese, I would say Doug was right on the money.

  • @FXWorldBeater China pre WW2 had Civil War & was not prepared for war. During war China was ruled by Warlords,Japanese puppet Emperor,Mao's Red Army,Nationalist Army,Japanese controlled Collaborationist Army.The Nationalist & Reds spent lots of resources fighting each other not Japs.Korean war proved Red Chinese Army were tough MacArthur wanted to nuke them.Remember never under estimate a potential enemy study them, learn from them,know their strenghts & faults

  • Japanese government has decided to select the F-35.

    JASDF selected lot of initial f-35A type.

    F-35C type want to operate the JMSDF DDH Hyūga class-based seaplane.

    When compared to the BAE aircraft,30 Years of operational durability F15 is evaluated.

    Robust design based on the combat data of the USA is determined the strongest.

    Japan technology and advanced that recognition is misleading.

    F15 has fallen several times during the flight parts. Come the limit on the aircraft.

  • i wanna get one of these, i would never be late for work again and nobody would fuck with me unless they want a high explosive surprise from the sky........lol

  • @fuxxxxclutch I don't think you would need to work if you had $150,000,000

  • @weswii i worked it out, the average person earning minimum wage would have to work 12 hours a day for about 4722 years before they can buy a f-35 jump jet. fuck it, ill get a cessna with bottle rockets. haha

  • im gonna blast all n00bs away on BF3 with this new awesome hover jet :D

  • @Eorthil and I will put u down with my AA lol ;)

  • Looks cool but like the harrier problem can't go to far or fast still gotta love our military

  • f35c Britain is having these along with the normal ones to replace the harrier in the air force and navy alongside f35bs and also on the two new carriers HMS Queen Elizabeth and HMS Prince of Wales

  • @777fatboyslim Britain is only getting the F-35C. You were originally getting F-35B's for two of your LHD's, but that plan has been changed.

    I believe your two existing LHD's are being scrapped or sold, and your new LHD which is in production will be altered to support catapult and wire.

  • The music is better to use in porn.

  • looks like a harrier

  • @cm6405 ...your blind

  • @WyattHowe5896 yeah i think thats from masterbating over aircraft ...i wonder if hes deaf

  • dear santa...

  • The Harrier was much better looking.

  • can't wait for Christmas. Been a good boy all year :)

  • F 35 TRANSFORM!!!

  • i got one in my room :)

  • Thrust vectoring owns the sky!

  • Whats the fuel consumption like?

  • I want one

  • That's one hell of a big butt!....It's all yours RADAR!

  • @pogpog28 thats actually the old prototype nozzle. The new nozzles are stealthy and a diverter system is built into the back of the turbine to eliminate its signature from the rear.

  • @FXWorldBeater Oh i see, that's good news.

  • @pogpog28 this is a stealth jet bro...

  • i just jizzed in my pants :3

  • i admire engineers who build this aircraft

  • @GmanSig220 call us gay what planes are in ur country i bet it cant beat the f-22

    

  • @spanishairsoftkiller since this is a joint project britain is getting these aswell and we have the eurofighter typhoon which is so advanced if the computers in it failed it would fall out of the sky that is a technical plane and also we are allies so we have planes in eachothers countries so we could use your planes on ops if we wanted just by asking

  • sexy

    

  • Optimus prime...

    you have a U.S.A.F problem ;D

  • What's the use for this. Seems like a waste of money. Maybe in future some new model can take of and fly like that?

  • The GAU-8 is not that effective at killing tanks, it is designed to take out lightly armored AAA (shilka) because it has a slightly longer effective range than most AAA systems of the cold war era. Not often, if ever, would you see an A-10 strafe a main battle tank with the gun, pilots and personnel on the ground would much rather prefer use of the mavericks

  • I don't know why but the engine reminds me the little thing that Cell from dragon ball z used to absorb people and the androids XD

  • I watched this bad boy take off in FWorth ... and its STOL characteristics are phenomenal! This was prior to the plane making its first hovering tests.

    This plane hit the gas ... and was GONE! and airborne. I don't think I've ever seen a jet generate that much speed from a dead stop and get airborne quite like that... except in the movie "Firefox" (remember that cheesy Eastwood flick from the 80's).

    Anyway - beautiful plane.

  • But, will it blend?

  • Meanwhile in Japan:

    Japanese are researching and manufacturing Gundams underground beneath their nuclear power plants.

  • It's a giant leap back if the F-35 replace the A-10!!!!

  • @Ex0core the F-35 i do not think will be a replacement for the A-10, even though one of its roles is ground attack ( many planes have a ground attack role such as te F-15E ) the A-10 is a strait up tank killer, and there is nothing that can match it in that role in the US arsenal, its a multi-role fighter so it will serve many purposes, as cool as the f-35 is its not a flying tank like the A-10, but the future of the F-35 is unclear and is under threat of cancelation. most are grounded right now

  • @phoboskitty "the A-10 is a strait up tank killer, and there is nothing that can match it in that role in the US arsenal"

    How many tanks do you think an A-10 can kill in a sortie? Do you think it could could 32 tanks like the F-35 could?

    Also, the F-35 can kill all 32 simultaneously and from 50+ miles away, unlike the A-10.

  • @FXWorldBeater i would rely on actual battle field data and not simulations, the f-35 has never seen combat and will not see combat for some time, the A-10 has a long history as a very reliable and deadly weapons platform, GAU-8 is best tank killing weapon ever devised in my opinion. the US army understands this well, and there are not plans to replace the A-10 till at least 2028, the f-35 sounds nice its not going to replace the A-10

  • @phoboskitty "GAU-8 is best tank killing weapon ever devised in my opinion" The GAU forces the A-10 to be vulnerable at low level to engage tanks ... IMO that is not as effective as being able to destroy multiple tanks in one run from 30,000ft.

    Numerous A-10's were lost in Iraq from shoulder mounted manpads, AA fire .... compare that to the attacks on libyan armor where the only aircraft downed was due to mechanical failures.

  • @phoboskitty "most are grounded right now"

    you're running off old news, all but 2 F-35's are back up and flying again.

  • @FXWorldBeater ah yes this is true, but still they have so many issues more maintanence than pretty much any other plane, i hope the f-35 dose not go the way of the f-22, so far i think there are only 20?

  • @phoboskitty The USAF think the F-35 replace the A-10 is because of the range of A-10 is shorter than

    f-35 and it is slower than the F-35, they want the agility of F-35 to kill tank but not the amour, damn, the A-10 score high in killing tank but the US want to replace them by a lower payload multirole fighter....

  • @Ex0core i doubt it will replace the A-10 the speed is not relevant, the whole point of the A-10 is that its slow and has a very small stall speed its like 40mph, the idea is that it can float over the battle field the f-35 is not specifically a tank killer the f-35 is a multi-role fighter that wil take the place of the f-16 in many cases, in future battles you will see both f-35's and A-10's in the skys, but specifically for anti-armor that is the domain of the A-10 and the AH-64,

  • @Ex0core Nothing shall EVER replace the A-10

  • @connerm191 dont u think thats kinda obvious

  • @Ex0core

    It won't so many military contractors have been signing agreements not to get rid of the A-10 so I don't think we have a problem.

  • Why do russians think that they are the best at everything and then post it on American Military vids? Gtfo russian fags talk shit get hit

  • @SlyNicolai tbh hovering to foward flight is not implemented yet

  • @190998spencer "tbh hovering to foward flight is not implemented yet"

    The aircraft can do it already. One of the F-35B test pilots said they will be testing vertical to forward flight this month or next prior to testing onboard the USS Wasp.

  • that is prefect machine up to now .nobody can  campaire it to something else of course for the moment.

  • @SlyNicolai Not sure about this, but the harrier can do something like that i.e. use hovermode to break or turn sharply. This is a more complicated design, looks more fragile too. I honestly have no idea.

  • @Gangstersev at what....airshows?

  • @CBlackjr Wait a little kid, and you will see what you want.

  • @Gangstersev What does that even mean? Sorry, but your English doesn't make sense.

  • @CBlackjr Please forgive me for my english I'm from Russia, the translation is in Google. I meant that the airshow will soon show the PAK FA T-50. Thank you.

  • These things have crappy payload, that's the only downside.

  • @Annofreak69 "These things have crappy payload" actually their payload is only small when its setup to fly stealthily.

    After air superiority is acheived and the f-35 goes into bomb truck mode using all it external stores, its carries a massive loadout. Eg ... 34 SDB glide bombs with 100km + range and laser, gps, radar guidance which can engage moving vehicles autonomously. The best loadout for a flanker with similarly capable weapons is 6 missiles.

  • Now how awesome is that.

  • looks beautiful :D

  • The music is Lame, thats a bad ass aircraft

  • Too bad Norway only bought the normal F-35. Wish we had this hovering badass!

  • @Speedblowers "Too bad Norway only bought the normal F-35" F-35A is a better fighter than the B (stovl version).

  • There's a great chance that the aft rotating nozzle could fail and explode. Try to create a vortex engine for xyz manouvre

  • Wow! It's unbelievable! In the 21th century the plane is hovering in the air! That is a technological breakthrough! By the time this flying errr... (you name it!) went overbuget for 150%.

  • @BorshCaen "In the 21th century the plane is hovering in the air! That is a technological breakthrough"

    The plane can literally land itself vertically. Has the most powerful fighter engine ever built and by far the best avionics suite ever built on a fighter. So you might say that it is indeed a technological breakthrough.

  • @VenVidiVici lol...I walked under one of the first generation Harriers at a military air museum just outside Edinburgh. Its a shame they have to mothball the Harrier. An amazing aircraft. Single engine with 4 thrusting nozzles. I know someone (who am not at liberty to say) who worked in the past in the defence aero-engine and with the RAF and he was also working with Joint Strike Fighter - it looks good but not as awesome as the Grumann Harrier

  • @MovieMad007 "it looks good but not as awesome as the Grumann Harrier"

    You basing the opinion on looks, or something that matters like performance? Performance-wise the F-35 is a far far better aircraft in every single way.

  • @FXWorldBeater I'm sure it's written in promotional posters. As I see F-35 has the best engine and the best avionics but still doesn't work. Some countries left the project. Its crystal clear why they did it. No one wants to feed american defense companies taking a part in perspectiveless project. At least the jet fighter can hover. In the 21th century that is not bad though!

  • @BorshCaen "Some countries left the project"

    Lol, this should be good .... which countries? Name them. :)

    "As I see F-35 has the best engine and the best avionics but still doesn't work" What doesn't work? The engine? The engine works fine ... its perfect.

    You are aware that the f-35 is still in development testing aren't you ... the reason its not operational has nothing to do with problems, but the fact that testing was initially slow to get started.

  • @FXWorldBeater Many crafts were in develpment testing. And where are they now? Yep, they're nowhere. Danmark has decided to buy F-18 E/F instead of F-35 in the beginning of 2010. At least they spent only $100 million. Also Netherlands left the project (spent $600 mln). Loyal countries are the countries which spent too much money to leave and they have no choice but purshase of the fighter. Nice trap, guys! Good work.

  • @BorshCaen "Many crafts were in develpment testing. And where are they now? Yep, they're nowhere"

    Maybe aircraft with 2, maybe 3 prototypes flying only. There are currently about 20 F-35's, 4 of those are production (will be in operation after the test program) fighters.

    The Dutch never cancelled their purchase of the F-35, they are merely holding off buying until late in the decade. Meanwhile, new buyers such as Israel and Japan have jumped onboard, and most likely South Korea too.

  • @BorshCaen Netherlands have never even hinted at pulling out of the F-35 program. They cancelled their order for their test aircraft only because they believe the US testing program is sufficient for their needs (and they don't need to pay for the testing to be done).

    So I suggest you go back and do your research a little better. :)

  • @BorshCaen " Danmark has decided to buy F-18 E/F instead of F-35 in the beginning of 2010"

    Nope Denmark have not made a decision on their next fighter either. They are holding a competition between F-18 super, F-35 and Gripen.

    The F-35 can do everything the other two aircraft can do, just better. There's a lot of stuff the other aircraft could never hope to do that the F-35 finds easy.

  • @FXWorldBeater Danmark didn't leave the project, they merely haven't made decision if they need F-35 comparing it to a different one. Why they have to stay at the project while they are not sure if they need it! Am I the only who noticed crash of logic? Dutch will order first jets in 2019. It's laughable. Empty promise. Even Turkey put F-35 on hold. No one needs this jet fighter. Putting on hold is just a polite pretext to cancel order in the future.

  • @NosferatuAaacaado - In that case, it's payback for the Rolls Royce Nene turbines that made the MiG-15 viable back in the fifties.

  • Fake

  • @mikeybrod no, it's real

  • cheap u.s. copy. but when china does it somehow its completely unacceptable.

  • Have you forgotten that Iran won the Iraq war against US. UK. France...using weapons which were used in World War II. It is not the weapon smart ass, it's the heart to fight which simply means balls. Got it now?

  • @hameed710 "Iran won the Iraq war"

    Really? In which way do you define that the Iraq war was lost?

    Allies: 4700 killed

    Insurgents and Iraqi soldiers: 70,000 killed

    Allied Objectives....

    Remove the Hussein regime: Check

    Kill Saddam Hussein: Check

    Install a new, puppet government: Check

    Train an army for the new puppet government: Check (500,000 troops)

    Secure cheap Iraqi oil contracts for US companies: Check (BP building Iraq's largest oilfield)

  • @FXWorldBeater I was refering to Iran-Iraq war, which was back by western imperialist countries and lasted for 8 years. And your information about Oil hungry countries, is limited to what you hear from media. There are 2 governments in Iraq, run by the 2 groups, one in north and one in central. And they are not exactly puppet. They fought with Saddam as long as he was in power and now they both are in power. Except the troops, there is no other company there to take cheap oil. Go see youself.

  • @FXWorldBeater There is no Oil company working there. No body is taking cheap oil. That was the dream that didn't come true. You can not find a single American or European company working there. Reason, there is no security for the invaders. They said that this war pays for itself, meaning the oil, but they didn't go there for oil exactly. Look around, read and listen more carefully, you might find some other reasons.

  • @hameed710 "They said that this war pays for itself, meaning the oil, but they didn't go there for oil exactly. Look around, read and listen more carefully, you might find some other reasons."

    I know it wasn't the ONLY reason. Strategic location for an attack on Iran (same as attacking afghanistan, although afghanistan is a good jump point for china too). Destabilisation of the arab nations .... bla bla. Oil was just a side benefit.

    tinyu r l. com/ylp4tml

  • Scrap it.Most expensive and unnecessary weapons system ever...get over it.

  • @ADDMOREMAPS not anywhere near the most expensive per unit cost. most expensive weapons program, yes ... thats because it is replacing 4 different aircraft across 3 services for US.

  • @ADDMOREMAPS it's 33 million less then the F-22 raptor. Just saying.

  • Did this video give anyone else a boner?

  • wow, i like the part where he calls Optimus prime

  • why turn this aircraft into transformer ?

  • @moistfaucet too make it more badass lol

  • @moistfaucet becouse it has 2 turbines inside, one for go ahead an another for vtol, the thing that moves is the air intake open/close for the vtol

  • @jorgeneo560 not two jet engines.... just one. A lift fan in the front is connected to the main turbine by a drive shaft and clutch. Its different to the old YAK 141 which had 2 extra turbines in the front instead of a single fan.

  • Looks good but looks so complicated that so much could break or go wrong.

  • @matty181190 The short take off / vertical landing model is only one variant.

  • can it stop from normal flight and just over, if it can how? wouldnt it take to long and just fall down?

  • @FHFYProductions Works on the same principals as a Harrier.

  • dear santa....

  • @moyad9119 That dear Santa joke is REALLY old now. It's now used as an excuse to get thumbs up.

  • @moyad9119 this joke is old.

  • 0:07-0:11... Mother just caught you doing the dirty.

  • Thrust vectoring owns the sky!

  • does anyone know what music is in the background?

  • Thar's sexy.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • looks like a bug

  • this thing is to heavy

    thats why the full priject will be scrapped

  • @LOUISVART its not heavy ... not sure where u got that from.

    As for the project, they've just started training the usaf pilots for it and there are now in excess of 15 F-35's flying .... not sure if you know it or not, but this jet is the US DoD's number 1 priority, no chance of being scrapped.

  • these things are amazing !!

  • With the runaway cost of the project and the price per aeroplane, and it's operation costs steadily rising you're not really saving any money either.

  • only think i don`t like to f-35 is, he is not so beautiful as f-22 (i know the look is not so important) ...f-35 for me is not beautiful :( ..f-22 is the coolest fighter jet i ever seen ( yf-23 was very cool to )

  • I know very much about F-35 but not that! Good for my country so are bying it :)

  • really looks like a rectum ready to take a dump...

  • Fake! You can see the ropes at 0:19 !!!

  • @Aircraftmechanical yeah its so fake. i dont know why the MILITARY is funding full production of this to replace the HARRIER, do you? oh wait, some imaginary ropes right? you people make me laugh

  • @COWCLAN1000 "gonna replace the harrier in the fleet air arm" not quite ... UK have changed their mind and will be going with the F-35C (carrier version) and will be modding their carriers with catapults.

    watch?v=2dR9IypaxF0

  • 0:09 looks like its pooping lol