No one without clearance had ever seen anything like anthrax as weaponized in letters incl one sent to Natl Enquirer - the paper created by a CIA full-timer, and go figure on that - so, why not an as-yet-unseen weapons-grade bldg taker-downer - with a Dr Ivins-type, genuine sympathizer of Al Qaeda on the inside? CTers give debunks this stuff on a platter They ought run with it, eliminate it, see where they're at once done.
Interesting, and the less said the better. When you have to reach for ludicrous, bizrarre explanations to explain a theory then maybe you should turn around and look at the theory and ask yourself whether it's correct or not.
No one without clearance had ever seen anything like anthrax as weaponized in letters incl one sent to Natl Enquirer - the paper created by a CIA full-timer, and go figure on that - so, why not an as-yet-unseen weapons-grade bldg taker-downer - with a Dr Ivins-type, genuine sympathizer of Al Qaeda on the inside? CTers give debunks this stuff on a platter They ought run with it, eliminate it, see where they're at once done.
newsmanbluesman 1 week ago
Interesting, and the less said the better. When you have to reach for ludicrous, bizrarre explanations to explain a theory then maybe you should turn around and look at the theory and ask yourself whether it's correct or not.
cwlldoran 10 months ago
Interesting, to say the least.
Funkadelic2 11 months ago