Im sure they convinced our leaders this is for "the better of our nation". but Operation Northwoods is horrible. It has ruined our economy, taken countless lives, and ruined America's reputation world wide.
Please read people, and do something. This is us, our families, our friends, our lives being thrown away by liars, greed, and illegal wars.
Bring home ALL of our troops, stop our nations longest war, and impeach these internal terrorists before they kill more of US. Together we stand.
For people who doubt, or hate the truth, please read more. Even if you think there is no way our government did this, keep reading the facts.
After spending years of solid study, the facts dont add up.
WTC 7 was a bunker and many secret documents. mayor giuliani was supposed to be there in case of a terrorist attack, but wasnt. They knew it was going to collapse, because it was a controlled demolition. Same as the twin towers. How sad and horrific. I still cant believe its true, but it is
I am only 31 years old, I was a kid when when bush sr tried to have reagan assassinated. I was a kid when we entered desert storm, and my parents friends went to war without cause or reason. I remember 9/11 so well, I enlisted and hated muslims and people who ran corner stores.
After finding the truth about 9/11, Operation Northwoods, and the lies, how they killed innocent Americans. I am now on the other side, and despise the people who have killed and ruined our nation. This is horrible
Why did rumsfield announce $2.3 trillion unaccounted for on 9/10, but on 9/11 cheney takes control of our nations air defence for the first time in history, and allows an airplane/missle to hit the pentagon? and all we can see is one blurry video with frames removed?
WTC 7 falls in free fall speed for no reason. Barry Jennings a key eye witness dies without cause or explanation? Why wasnt the mayor in his "bunker" during the attacks? Why was the collapse of WTC 7 announced 15 early?
Bush sr then used his connections and relatives to give his son an illegal win as our president so he could complete his plans.
This is Operation Northwoods.
nobody cared or remembers the 1994 bombing. But we all remember the 9/11 2001...
Because they needed a bigger show to convince our nation to start a world war. We also created racism, and ruined our economy while israel has been robbing us blind.
This video doesn't explain the pancake effect of the whole tower falling. also doesn't explain why they found molten steel in the basement of the tower during the cleanup.
NOBODY FOUND molten steel in the basements of the tower.
Molten steel exists at 1500 C. Nasa AVIRIS Infrared scans were done on the 16th and 19th, and they found NO PART of the debris pile on the whole WTC plaza got over 800 C. In case you are NOT following, that's 700 C below the temp of molten steel, and 1700 C below Thermite IRON of any type.
The 9/11 conspiracy is played out, give it up, it's as logical as flying pink elephants.
Everyone check out SUSAN LINDAUER who sent John Ashcroft & Andrew Card information about an attack on the WTC,by air,in August2001,before it happened.Google Susan Lindauer & see how the Bushies PUT HER IN JAIL on false charges(so what else is new)She gave direct evidence about the attack & it was all ignored.,once again.
Everyone check out SUSAN LINDAUER who sent John Ashcroft & Andrew Card information about an attack on the WTC,by air,in August2001,before it happened.Google Susan Lindauer & see how the Bushies PUT HER IN JAIL on false charges(so what else is new)She gave direct evidence about the attack & it was all ignored.,once again.
This would only explain, that level where the impact happen. It would not explain, why the whole building came down. People, look. If you have any brain. See pass the lies. This happen on the top floor and it does explain, what happen to the fuel. Now, with that in mind. How can any fuel run down the building, to do this to any of the other supports? How can it bring down, the whole build on the same principle? People stop kidding yourself on the bullshit. Are you a horse with blinders, on?
It's so interesting how this video shows the airplane's wings braking the columns in half when they clearly said that the reason of the perfect whole (missile look alike) in the pentagon was because the airplane's wings are so fragile that they were disintegrated on impact. Leaving no trace and a perfect whole instead.
this is bullshit it does not prove anything!!! why can't they just admit it was an inside job! all the figers r pointing at them!! i don't care care what u have in mind but they r guilty (The gov)
How does a fluid filled aluminum canister simulate a jet wing????? This is like a good magic trick, lost of smoke and mirrors, but the bottom line is flawed. SO greatly flawed its hilarious.
LOLOLOL this "simulation" is such bullshit. Its BULLSHIT. Its impossible for the temperature to reach 1200 degrees, not even NEAR it. At most it would have reached 700 degrees, but without explosives a jet fuel fire cant get it that hot. Coming from a Physics professor.
Even if the steel did get that hot, you have the Towers falling at FREEFALL speed. If the steel weakened, it would take it longer than freefall speed for the towers to reach the ground. Freefall speed = support core was blown.
they did what? fall at free fall speed? All you need to do is watch the video of the collapse. see all the stuff falling faster than the towers -- that stuff is free falling, since the towers are not falling as fast they are not falling at free fall. How can truthers be so stupid?
Free energy can change the world!But Millions are spend in supressing that information,Get a motor that works with the power of magnets only at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,take part in the revolution!
There is newly released documented evidence into the 9/11 investigation, I found this to be some of the most informative information about 9/11 so far.
I can't even begin to imagine what the poor people on the plane where feeling, knowing what was going on...and what the poor people who worked in the towers where the plane impacted!!
i wonder what the effect would be if you took an aluminum sludge hammer and hit a thick steel beam. would the aluminum hammer put a massive dent in the steel beam?
when the building began to fall for the reasons stated here, the force of the falling structure was multiplied on the beams supporting it. these beams were then put under more pressure than they were designed to, which is why the whole building fell
@PrivationProductions Ummm, are you kidding? Do you have any idea how heavy that steel is? If the support collapse on one floor there are millions of pounds resting on top of it. Therefore it collapsed like dominoes.
@Tidoublemy it didn't collapse like dominoes [a better paradigm is pancake, since it was a vertical fall, not a horizontal one]. if that were the case, it would have collapsed much slower - slowing down as it meets some resistance of the structure below. watch this series if you really want to challenge your assumptions. AE911TRUTH - at the Commonwealth Club - 1/6
This is the biggest piece of shit video I have ever watched... This doesn't explain building 7 which wasn't even hit by a plane and collapsed. Also, the vertical pressure on the soft beams wouldn't cause the entire building to fall, because surely the beams at the bottom of the building are strong enough to withstand ALL the vertical pressure of the building, or it would have collapsed simply from its own weight. This video ruins NationalGeographic's image. Share this knowledge!
Politics, money, war, death, religion, freedom, 420, 9/11, 2012, Planet X, what? huh? Maybe it'll come together for you in my new music video, maybe not. You tell me. The video will be my comment. To see it for yourself, click on my user name or search youtube for "The Urban Legend of Planet X" or "Highway420Music" Please leave a comment. Send it to your friends. HELP ME MAKE THIS THING GO VIRAL! thanks thc
Politics, money, war, death, religion, freedom, 9/11, 2012, Planet X, what? huh? Maybe it'll come together for you in my new music video, maybe not. You tell me. The video will be my comment. To see it for yourself, search youtube for "The Urban Legend of Planet X" or "Highway420Music" Please leave a comment. Send it to your friends. HELP ME MAKE THIS THING GO VIRAL! thanks thc
Still doesnt explain how both the buildings came straight down instead of sliding off to one side. Ok you got heat to soften the metal, then you got the wind rocking the towers, then with the fire adding internal pressure outward the beams should have Z-ed from the weight of the remaining tower above and rolled off a side. And Id like to see Purdue simulate Building7.
I was going to rudly comment to you but then after checking your profile I felt sorry for you.......I found that ur a FAGGOT. Ever wonder What AIDS stands for?...Asshole Injected Death Sentence. You should know that god gave us all an A-hole for EXIT only. But if you keep forgetting just eat as much hot and spicy foods till ur stuffed. When you go to use the bathroom it will remind you what ur asshole is really used for.....enjoy!
@Denierbud11 you obviously have never been in the towers or anything similar. of course wind moves the towers. they were built to move a small amount. on really stormy days, people would get seasick in the upper floors. steel does have some flexibility - which is a good thing.
I have been in the towers and I have been in other large buildings. The towers donot rock with the wind, they will move a small amount, but I stand by my statement and do not know what you are getting at.
There is a thing in engineering called tendency! You model an equation for one event, you will find another similar event will act in almost the same exact way! That is how we model equations, to give us a mathematical answer for any event of that type. Yea sure there will be a percent error since no two things are the same, but that percent error is arbitrary when all factors are accounted for in the equation model.
@AstralPlaner I wonder if private donations are ever agenda driven? THIS ENTIRE FUCKING GOVERNMENT IS AGENDA DRIVEN BY PRIVATE DONATIONS. LOL
I'm with you 100%. Half of this horseshit is GUESSES. They attach a university name to it to try to make it legitimate but it only shows what lying scum will do for money.
@tlages NIST only had 236 samples of steel, and none of the core samples showed heating above 480 degrees F.
National Geographic couldn't make 180 pounds of thermite damage a steel column. Jonathan Cole cut a beam vertically with 2 pounds.
For more on Cole's work and three mainstream TV tests of thermite (mythbusters, National Geographic, and Jesse Ventura), and about the mysterious inability of world-class explosives experts to make thermite cut steel, see my video:
OK. the offer still stands. We will have to use an expert. Like say, oh, Pratt & Whitney (sp?) or Rolls Royce or GE, the companies that make jet engines and see what they say the temp of burning Jet fuel and how long it would take to burn 10,000 gallons of jet fuel. If the fuel was atomized (good nonsense word) in just a few seconds it would explode. Oh thats right all that fuel was transported (see Star Trek) into the delta quadrant along with all the Oxygen that would be required.
This building was reinforced and protected for fires. The steel beams were insulated to prevent loss of structual integrity during a fire in the building. Oh. and what would normally be burning in a fire in the WTC? Ciggarettes, paper, office furniture, tacky corporate wall art. office machines. Nope! Nothing in the specs about any material being protected in case 10,000 gallons of burning jet fuel was delivered to the 93 floor by a 767.
Hey zip ty for brains. I will clean your bathroom with my toothbrush if you can produce any verifiable video that shows how the 10,000 gallons of jet fuel in 767 fuel tanks burns up in less than, oh I'll be very lax on time, less than 15 minutes. Oh, and what temp does jet fuel burn at? 1200 degrees F. And how hot does steel have to be before it begins to lose its structural integrity? (Starts to soften and bend under a load.) 750 degrees.
As for the fuel 10,000 you said.I'm not sure excactly how much they had onboard at the time but lets say 10,000g
Most of that would have been atomized on impact going up in a huge fire ball lasting a few seconds.Not being around long enough to do what this video or anyone else is saying.
at 3:50 he says the beams are unprotected. that is a bold face lie. ive seen the footage of the construction on youtube. and everyone of the 47 beams in the core of the building had a fireproof insulation on them.
lie lie and more lies and propaganda. What a croc of BS. Aluminum cans.? Computer rendering? more like CGI. and soo dramatic. Love the voiceover. No science here. NG should be ashamed of itself. I will never buy another magazine. More conspirators. How these people sleep at night I'll never know.
Why is National Geographic or certain elements within it, or in contact with it so obviously concerned about this? Why so devoted to proving that 19 hijackers brought down the building. Why don't they just cue up flight 175 from CNN's film "America Remembers", and slow it way down and zoom in really close to the plane so we can all see the bottom? Look for that video clip on Youtube, and you'll understand what this N.G. documentary is all about.
@yawnhockel your questions are good. not sure about your conclusions... i lost a lot of respect for ng when this video came out - and i grew up w/ every ng magazine since 1904 - reading every single one of them since. ng is a patron saint in my family, but this video is a travesty of lies and disillusionment.
Crap in, crap out. That's what happens with a computer. Half of the fuel should of burned up with the explosion and not inside the building as the graphics in this vid incorrectly show.
"widespread fires initiated by the jet feul, weakened the steel collumns, and brought down the WTC." Okay this is quite a leap to make. They expect us to believe that some weak columns on just a section of a few floors was enough to bring down these massive structures at the rate of gravity. If you believe that then you need to go back and take high school physics again, because obviously you've missed something. Unbelievable.
the temperatures of the fires inside the wtc reached 1800f which is enough to weaken the steal up to 90 percent. thats only having 10 percent of the original designs rigidity. you could see the tower bowing. theres nothing unbelievable otherwise. if you care to bring this debate to PM please do so
US banks billed their customers 24 billion dollars in penalty fees for overdrawing their accounts last year, a 35 percent increase over the previous year, a study has found.
Fees are charged whether the overdraft is for five dollars or 50 dollars.
These practices are especially alarming given that institutions automatically enroll consumers into this type of program, even when lower-cost forms of overdraft protection are usually available.
Over thinking over analyzing seperates the body from the mind people. Ya its deff for sure from a song. But it makes sence and i understand it. No 2nd meaning in anything that happened. Bush is responcible for 911. End of story.
which is why many believe that there is no way the plane completely went inside the building with no pieces or debris on the outside of the building. We are supposed to also believe that the resulting crash and fuel burning collapsed three buildings but at the pentagon it did not even burn paper, wood computers in the building immediately next to where the plane supposedly is.
Have none of these so called scientists heard of heat conduction? The heat that was received by any of the steel would be immediately conducted through the whole steel structure, thus not allowing the steel to get to those temperatures since the heat would be continually be conducted away. The steel were continuous columns and were connected to the whole massive (several thousand tons of steel). Why do these folk keep trying to fool everyone.
what I mean by crappy job is not the amount of destruction and lives lost. obviously that was massive. I mean what a bad job they did of making it look like someone else did it. If there were not so many things that happened that day that had never happened b4, It would be easier to believe it was the way they said. Again I would rather believe this was NOT done by our own people, I just cant. I wont believe lies to make my world feel safer. this video proves nothing. doesn't simulate collapse
Al these patriots that you hate and call nuts are the people you are going to turn to when the shit really hits the fan. They are the ones preparing. You will be begging them to save your asses and wishing you had listened. You can call them and me whatever you want but why do you hate people just because when they see something that is BS they say hey thats BS? The only thing that makes me think Maybe it was terrorists is what a crappy job they did pulling this off.
Truthfully, you think people want to believe that this was carried out by our own people? NO! I have children. I dont want to believe that we live in a country where this would happen but they expect us to swallow way too much. Way to many unanswered questions. I mean 1 building falling in a way no other building, struck by a plane, has ever fallen is hard enough to believe. We are supposed to believe that 3 did from 2 planes?!?! come on how do people not question that? wake up
I dont understand when he says (2:49) that their simulation of the broken broken beams coincide almost exactly with the broken beams at the wtc. how would they know which beams were actually broken at the wtc?
How the hell did the plane manage to sever the steel beams at the World Trade Centers, but at the Pentagon, the beams severed the wings, yet they were smaller and weaker than those at the two towers?
Secondly, the beam used in the experiment was fucking tiny and it took hours for it to melt and finally buckle, yet the first tower came down in minutes! We are made to believe that jet fuel brought temperatures of 2000 degrees, yet firefighters called from those places where it was 2000 degrees BS
where do you get that the Pentagon (!) is built weaker than a commercial building? The Pentagon is constructed like a fortress. I have worked in/on the Pentagon as a contractor and it is built like nothing you have seen for strength.
How is it that traces of nanothermite were found in the rubble of the world trade centers? The media reported on the collapse of building 7 as the building was in the background behind the reporter! It was a controlled demolition. Jet fuel is not what caused a building which was not hit by a plane to collapse symetrically. Nanothermite brought down building 7 and 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB!!!
Well thank god for the swine flu. All the twoofers wont get the vaccine and die. Then we can all live in peace without these conspiracy nuts blabbering on about chemtrails and crap.
@The61769 And everything truthers claim is facts backed with evidene? I haven't heard anything a truther say that sounds convincing. The day a truther provide some believable evidence I will start listening to them, sort of.
@The61769 "thats a good point. if only there was a death disease that only hits people with that level of dumb to believe it was a conspiracy...."
This is old I know.
What (Theorists) do, is link all intelligence investigating the (9/11) attacks before they took place, and claim it's proof of prier knowledge. The problem with the *Real* truth here is, they ignore the fact, Intel didn't have (When and How.)
They only knew where. Might as well be dead, not having the key knowledge they needed.
@FievelJ69 Of course they knew it was WTC.. They planned this for a very long time.
1994 WTC bomb was built by our very own FBI. The recorded phone calls proving this can be found on the web. The only fault of the 94 bomb, it wasnt put in the correct location.
Clinton knew about this illegal war and attempted to start it immediatly after his inauguration.
Bush Sr, was the first to start this illegal war with Desert Storm. Even though congress NEVER declared war.
the key to the tower tragedy is revealed in the collapse of building 7. Without question it was a planned demoliton in building 7. No one in the science, design, or physics community believes otherwise to my knowlege. The question is who planned this and what cooperation did they have here.?
And BTW - it has now been shown through peer reviewed scientific research that there was unexploded nano thermite in multiple dust samples from the WTC. So how about we cut out the kiddie shit and have a real investigation?
Both 110 story buildings collapsed in just over 10 seconds - slighty less than free fall. The tops of the towers did not fall over, but collapsed through the path of greatest resistance - 70 to 85 floors of undamaged concrete, un-"softened" steel and glass, with all 110 stories being turned to dust. This little soda can test doesn't explain that. I'm disappointed in you National Geographic. For shame.
You dont need a degree to see the obvious. Everything he stated is obvious and admitted in the official report. They just failed to explain how this would be possible through a gravity driven collapse. It is not plausible that the building could fall at near free fall speed straight through steel beams and concrete. Take a sec and think about it. How can something fall through solid floors and beams as fast as something falling through purely air as resistance? Don't need a degree for that one.
Oh here we go with another arm chair engineer, free fall?? i think not, look at the collapse and notice the debris that are falling down all around the building, the debris are falling much faster then the actual building. Why you ask? because the debris are falling at free fall speeds NOT the building.
The reason why the towers fell was because they made them cheap.If they made them out of the same material and layout as the Empire state building they would still be standing. If you didnt know a plane crashed in the empire state building.The pilot was blinded by fog and crashed but THAT building is still standing! I rest my case...
if you think the government did it, get out of the country... u communists!!!
why would a government do that? there is no gain, and it is proven that the muslims planed this, it was on a laptop found in the guys house, h guy who planed many attacks, and tried a few, 1993, two towers
You commenters are all nothing but just paranoid freaks. This anamation uses EVERY SINGLE law of physics possible. And every time you are presented with the facts, you just deny them and make outrageous claims. You people sicken me.
if thats the reasoning for the towers falling then how come they fell down in a perfect line . most buildings when they collapse fall to the side. only controlled "demolitions" (keyword) fall straight down. another thing is the beams of the towers. if you looks at pics of the rubble of the towers after they fell, the beams sticking out, look cut, perfectly cut, just like they do in demolitions. they set up explosives to cut the beams like that and they do pre-cutting as well
computer graphics are interesting but physics is more important. Hundreds of tons of steel vs. aluminum and kerosene. If fires can bring down steel frame buildings, why has it not happened before or since? It is physically impossible, or otherwise we'd all be afraid to live and work in high rise buildings.
I'm sure a bunch of people at Purdue didn't think to take physics into account. You're probably correct on this one. I'm guessing all the modeling they did was just to make the graphics prettier, not to make the data model more robust.
The description needs to be fixed, this is a simulation of the impact not the collapse. I watched this entire documentary. There is no simulation of the burning and collapse.
So where did the molten metal come from? Why was so hot in the basement 3 days later?? Why is the base of the core cut at an angel?? Why are there explosions going down the building? Why did fire fighters reach the impact hole on tower 1 when "Jet Fuel" was in the stair cases? So many unanswer questions and alot of cover ups.
Is that Purdue's simulation DID NOT INCLUDE the building's CORE.
Where in the bloody hell is the core?
Also, all that fuel burned up when the 767 crashed on impact. Why do you think there was such a large fireball after impact?
Also, the black smoke is not an indication of jet fuel. Ethanol fuel doesn't burn black. Black smoke means that the fire is starving itself of oxygen and its dissipating, with temps of 500F.
This is interesting. People should understand that NIST claims that the plane cut the building in half. Then, the second half of the building fell 1-10 floors on to the bottom half of the building. Then, the force caused the bottom half to shatter and collapse. If this were true, the top half would meet and equal and opposite force when it fell onto the bottom half - Thus, slowing it down or stopping it when it hits. This does not happen. The top drops at free fall speed as if it were demolished
They should also recognize that the open chemistry and physics journal found Active nano thermite in the debris. This is very important because this stuff is used in demolitons. Not only this, but its a very advanced material. I also want to point out building 7's disintegration into dust. It was not even hit by a plane. There is no logical reason for that building to disintegrate, unless we take into account the thermite and melted steel in the debris pointing to a demolition.
those fires where only 600-800 degrees, and to melt steel it takes 2000 degrees and even if it was weakened they would have stayed in place because its not like every part of the long ass beams where on fire
there was an investigation done recently that said debris and fires led to the collapse of wtc 7
BULLSHIT-WHO DID THE INVESTIGATION&WHAT PART DID THEY HAVE IN THE COVERUP?HOW MUCH WERE THEY PAID BY THE GOVERNMENT?R U TRULY THAT FUCKING STUPID?
THERE IS NO TAPE OF A PLANE HITTING THE PENTAGON U MORON.THERE WERE OVER 30 TAPES THAT WERE NOT RELEASED HOWEVER.AND THE EYEWITNESSES TESTIFIED TO THE EXACT OPOSITE OF THE OFFICIAL STORY.U HAVE 2 B A TOTAL FUCKING MORON.2 B THAT STUPID.
What can be proved is that the government LIED THEIR ASS OFF.The 911 Commissioner Thomas Keene said that the commission was a farce because the Bush Cabal would not provide ANY INFORMATION WHATSOEVER.
100% COVERUP-4 WHAT REASON?WHO IS GUILTY?WHO WAS PROMOTED-EVERYONE.
Who was held responsible?NOBODY.
How many questions were answered-NONE>ALL BULLSHIT.-JUST LIKE THIS VIDEO.
WTC7-COLLAPSED LIKE A FUCKING DEMOLITION EXACTLY.ALL LIES
Military Field Manual FM 5-250; Explosives and Demolitions, June 1992: Page 86
3-6. Steel-Cutting Charges.
(d) Nickel-molybdenum steel. This type of steel cannot be cut easily by conventional steel-cutting charges. . . . . However, the saddle charge will not cut nickel-molybdenum shafts. Therefore, use some method other than explosives to cut nickel-molybdenum steel, such as THERMITE or acetylene or electrical cutting tools.
In the video simulation, after the wings have been demolished by the external support columns, they continue inside. Inside, ALL the wing parts destroy ALL the internal columns. This is absurd on it's face.
yes, some of the plane should have bounced off and fallen to the ground.
aluminum airplane wings wont pierce a steel frame building. the towers were designed to withstand MULTIPLE collisions with jumbo jets.
none of the 3 buildings should have collapsed into themselves either. there are no steel framed buildings in the world that have collapsed because of internal fires. none. there's footage on youtube of one burning for days.
u probably believe people die from marijuana overdoses too.
Learn fluid dynamics you fucking moron before you make yourself look even more stupid .
Fuel encased in aluminum traveling at high speed can cut steel as shown in the video. Unless the university is part of the cover up and all that is video editing like the fake planes.
Fuel encased in aluminum traveling at high speed can cut steel as shown in the video-LOL
What an asshole u r.Fuel encased in aluminum?
U truly r a moron.What the fuck kind of scienec is that jerkoff.?totally dumb-just like u.
What was the steel?What quality?What thickness?What thickness was the aluminum?There r so many different variables u dumb fuck that it proves NOTHING ASSWIPE.
Dude you are unleashing the fury the the CAPS lock key. And yes the wings would have cut the steel we good damned saw it on live tv (well I did you argue like you are 12)unless all that was photoshop
FLUID DYNAMICS?lol ALL U CAN DO IS MAKE VIDEO GAMES U DUMB FUCK.Worthless channel page asswipe.I'll bet u believe NIST and the 911 commission too right asswipe? loser
Oh great Ad-Ad-hominem attacks, straw man claims and childish personal messages and comments on my profile .I'm not going to bother with you you sir are a fucking imbecile.
I have a life asshole-u don't know how i favorite any video asswipe.But u can basically mind your own business schmuck.Funny how my site seems so important to a wimp like u. lol
Yeah i can't wait to grow up like you and have nothing but GRAND THEFT AUTO-a fucking video game all over my page-lol-loser.N u call me a 12 year old-lol-u don't even rate that high cocksnot. lol
but you have to explain the missing plane peices the lack of investigation the towers falling at free fall rates wtc building 7's collapse the pentagon: 84 tapes confiscated & withheld by the fbi how 'tiny' this jumbo jet was that somehow pierced several bunker-thick walls without a trace the lack of skid where the plane suppusedly skid the lack of any public photo or video of the crash don't believe everything that you breathe u should check out who made this documentary :-)
Double free fall? Bullshit.Can't find the proof?What else is new?Besides there r 3 buildings that were demolished that day.Which 1 u talking about.3 steel buildings all collapsed at basically free fall speed-(look up Richard Gage-engneer&architect) ONE OF WHICH WAS NEVER HIT BY A PLANE OR ANY SIZEABLE AMOUNT OF ANY DEBRIS WITH FIRES ON only 3 floors barely burning.But that fucker came down at free fall speed.hardly any damage.911 was an inside job.
there was an investigation done recently that said debris and fires led to the collapse of wtc 7
BULLSHIT-WHO DID THE INVESTIGATION&WHAT PART DID THEY HAVE IN THE COVERUP?HOW MUCH WERE THEY PAID BY THE GOVERNMENT?R U TRULY THAT FUCKING STUPID?
THERE IS NO TAPE OF A PLANE HITTING THE PENTAGON U MORON.THERE WERE OVER 30 TAPES THAT WERE NOT RELEASED HOWEVER.AND THE EYEWITNESSES TESTIFIED TO THE EXACT OPOSITE OF THE OFFICIAL STORY.U HAVE 2 B A TOTAL FUCKING MORON.2 B THAT STUPID.
What, without insulation? Notice how the old man says that the steel columns were not insulated, why would they be insulated? All the columns were wrapped in asbestos, not insulation. That was a safety measure back in the early 70's to prevent this scenario from even happening. Asbestos did not become illegal to use until 1989. If they were required to remove the asbestos it would have cost more than to demolish the structures and rebuild them. Silverstein, is on the board of that insurance Co!
Also Purdue did not even show the fuel being ignited outside the tower during impact like videos show. All of the fuel according to their models ignited inside the structure.
Making up information without using observational data is not a scientific method. Thus their model is not scientific.
You see, not all of the structural points could have equally melted in such an uncontrolled blaze of fire. If the buildings were to fall in on themselves, that would mean that all vital structural points would have had to fail equally around the perimeter of the building for many several floors. We know the fires did not burn this way, so toppling into it's own foot print is impossible according to the "Official Story".
As for the falling speed, look into the Law Of Falling Bodies.
My understanding is that the buildings were designed so that the center supports were the major load-bearing structures. Once the steel weakened enough so that the first of the floors collapsed, I would expect the floor to star
This has been flagged as spam show
9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out, Full-length, Pre-Release-v1.3; Low-Res. /watch?v=lw-jzCfa4eQ
911debunkerschannel 2 months ago
Im sure they convinced our leaders this is for "the better of our nation". but Operation Northwoods is horrible. It has ruined our economy, taken countless lives, and ruined America's reputation world wide.
Please read people, and do something. This is us, our families, our friends, our lives being thrown away by liars, greed, and illegal wars.
Bring home ALL of our troops, stop our nations longest war, and impeach these internal terrorists before they kill more of US. Together we stand.
JonnyPitiful 3 months ago
For people who doubt, or hate the truth, please read more. Even if you think there is no way our government did this, keep reading the facts.
After spending years of solid study, the facts dont add up.
WTC 7 was a bunker and many secret documents. mayor giuliani was supposed to be there in case of a terrorist attack, but wasnt. They knew it was going to collapse, because it was a controlled demolition. Same as the twin towers. How sad and horrific. I still cant believe its true, but it is
JonnyPitiful 3 months ago
I am only 31 years old, I was a kid when when bush sr tried to have reagan assassinated. I was a kid when we entered desert storm, and my parents friends went to war without cause or reason. I remember 9/11 so well, I enlisted and hated muslims and people who ran corner stores.
After finding the truth about 9/11, Operation Northwoods, and the lies, how they killed innocent Americans. I am now on the other side, and despise the people who have killed and ruined our nation. This is horrible
JonnyPitiful 3 months ago
Why did rumsfield announce $2.3 trillion unaccounted for on 9/10, but on 9/11 cheney takes control of our nations air defence for the first time in history, and allows an airplane/missle to hit the pentagon? and all we can see is one blurry video with frames removed?
WTC 7 falls in free fall speed for no reason. Barry Jennings a key eye witness dies without cause or explanation? Why wasnt the mayor in his "bunker" during the attacks? Why was the collapse of WTC 7 announced 15 early?
JonnyPitiful 3 months ago
Bush sr then used his connections and relatives to give his son an illegal win as our president so he could complete his plans.
This is Operation Northwoods.
nobody cared or remembers the 1994 bombing. But we all remember the 9/11 2001...
Because they needed a bigger show to convince our nation to start a world war. We also created racism, and ruined our economy while israel has been robbing us blind.
JonnyPitiful 3 months ago
They left out the building's core structure entirely. This model is worthless.
jeanfoxutube 4 months ago
This video doesn't explain the pancake effect of the whole tower falling. also doesn't explain why they found molten steel in the basement of the tower during the cleanup.
TheDanthok 6 months ago
@TheDanthok
NOBODY FOUND molten steel in the basements of the tower.
Molten steel exists at 1500 C. Nasa AVIRIS Infrared scans were done on the 16th and 19th, and they found NO PART of the debris pile on the whole WTC plaza got over 800 C. In case you are NOT following, that's 700 C below the temp of molten steel, and 1700 C below Thermite IRON of any type.
The 9/11 conspiracy is played out, give it up, it's as logical as flying pink elephants.
Merlin5by5 5 months ago
Can anybody tell me where is the video that explains what happened to WTC 7 ?
Thanks (sarcasm)
griego1583 10 months ago 2
@griego1583 EEEEEEXAAAAACTLY!!!!!! PLEASE NAT GEO, EXPLAIN THAT BULL!
gregthesenior12 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Everyone check out SUSAN LINDAUER who sent John Ashcroft & Andrew Card information about an attack on the WTC,by air,in August2001,before it happened.Google Susan Lindauer & see how the Bushies PUT HER IN JAIL on false charges(so what else is new)She gave direct evidence about the attack & it was all ignored.,once again.
cadu1995 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Everyone check out SUSAN LINDAUER who sent John Ashcroft & Andrew Card information about an attack on the WTC,by air,in August2001,before it happened.Google Susan Lindauer & see how the Bushies PUT HER IN JAIL on false charges(so what else is new)She gave direct evidence about the attack & it was all ignored.,once again.
cadu1995 10 months ago
Conspiracy theorists say jet fuel fires couldn't have brought down the towers -- but a simulation of the impact proves otherwise. HORSESHIT NONSENSE.
2 Planes brought down THREE BUILDINGS & destroyed 4 others-LOL My ass.No one has proved that whatsoever.
FUCKING SHILLS.
cadu1995 10 months ago
This would only explain, that level where the impact happen. It would not explain, why the whole building came down. People, look. If you have any brain. See pass the lies. This happen on the top floor and it does explain, what happen to the fuel. Now, with that in mind. How can any fuel run down the building, to do this to any of the other supports? How can it bring down, the whole build on the same principle? People stop kidding yourself on the bullshit. Are you a horse with blinders, on?
UolinE 11 months ago
911 was an inside job
1st only 3 steel buildings have ever in the world fallen due to fire wtc 1 and 2 and wtc building 7
wow what a coincidence
steel buildings do not fall due to fire
4444mrryan 11 months ago
It's so interesting how this video shows the airplane's wings braking the columns in half when they clearly said that the reason of the perfect whole (missile look alike) in the pentagon was because the airplane's wings are so fragile that they were disintegrated on impact. Leaving no trace and a perfect whole instead.
griego1583 11 months ago
@griego1583 lol Busted them playing their lying bullshit game buddy.
cadu1995 10 months ago
this is bullshit it does not prove anything!!! why can't they just admit it was an inside job! all the figers r pointing at them!! i don't care care what u have in mind but they r guilty (The gov)
samispender9 11 months ago
NIST did NOT study
DEMOLITION of WTC 1 and 2.
this Perdue CARTOON is not a study of the
DEMOLITION of WTC 1 and 2.
Mete Sozen shows his face, THE Mete Sozen that said this:
[]"In this case, one wing hit the ground; the other was sheared off by the force of the impact with the Pentagon's load-bearing columns, ..."
Mete Sozen, professor of structural engineering at Purdue University.
Popular Mechanics - March 2005
[]
which wing was sheared off Mete?
bIZAROsPRMN11 11 months ago
Expensive cartoon. Let's examine the actual steel for traces of nano-thermite.
TruthMakesPeace 11 months ago
How does a fluid filled aluminum canister simulate a jet wing????? This is like a good magic trick, lost of smoke and mirrors, but the bottom line is flawed. SO greatly flawed its hilarious.
f0rumrr 1 year ago
what a pack of lies! i'm so disappointed in ng.
ho2cultcha 1 year ago
LOLOLOL this "simulation" is such bullshit. Its BULLSHIT. Its impossible for the temperature to reach 1200 degrees, not even NEAR it. At most it would have reached 700 degrees, but without explosives a jet fuel fire cant get it that hot. Coming from a Physics professor.
Even if the steel did get that hot, you have the Towers falling at FREEFALL speed. If the steel weakened, it would take it longer than freefall speed for the towers to reach the ground. Freefall speed = support core was blown.
Carryon871 1 year ago
@Carryon871
the towers did not fall at free fall speed, why do you lie?
Denierbud11 1 year ago
@Denierbud11 They did. Look it up.
Carryon871 1 year ago
@Carryon871
they did what? fall at free fall speed? All you need to do is watch the video of the collapse. see all the stuff falling faster than the towers -- that stuff is free falling, since the towers are not falling as fast they are not falling at free fall. How can truthers be so stupid?
Denierbud11 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free energy can change the world!But Millions are spend in supressing that information,Get a motor that works with the power of magnets only at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,take part in the revolution!
SanRamon6768 1 year ago
are they retarded. thousands of hour just for this.
peanutbuttersticky 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free Energy is real and its here! The Oil companies are doing everything they can to stop these
information. If you want a Free energy machine , get the blueprints at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM , Join the
revolution!
dharmastipulate 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
There is newly released documented evidence into the 9/11 investigation, I found this to be some of the most informative information about 9/11 so far.
youtube.com/user/investigations2012
HempNinja1 1 year ago
Who's funding your liberal institution? George Soros? Not very objective or scientific. I'm not drinking your kool-aid.
adamsra2000 1 year ago
you should be ashamed of yourself
lying to the peoples ..
911 was controlled explosive demolition .
i have canceled my subscriptions to your magazine ..
shame on you..
chena3 1 year ago
@chena3 - I cancelled my subscription when I could find those naked chicks on the internet
yynnmmbb 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It's cute how these idiots are trying to lie to us.
LittleRicky63 1 year ago
I can't even begin to imagine what the poor people on the plane where feeling, knowing what was going on...and what the poor people who worked in the towers where the plane impacted!!
Addicted890189 1 year ago
damn
CODEColt45 1 year ago
i wonder what the effect would be if you took an aluminum sludge hammer and hit a thick steel beam. would the aluminum hammer put a massive dent in the steel beam?
parkergmatas 1 year ago
I just don't buy it.....
11harrison11 1 year ago
when the building began to fall for the reasons stated here, the force of the falling structure was multiplied on the beams supporting it. these beams were then put under more pressure than they were designed to, which is why the whole building fell
jwek94 1 year ago
The narrarator says, "And that's what brought down the towers"
Yeah, I'm actually not terribly surprised about the floors above collapsing... but the whole building? Where is that simulation?
PrivationProductions 1 year ago
@PrivationProductions Ummm, are you kidding? Do you have any idea how heavy that steel is? If the support collapse on one floor there are millions of pounds resting on top of it. Therefore it collapsed like dominoes.
Tidoublemy 1 year ago
@Tidoublemy it didn't collapse like dominoes [a better paradigm is pancake, since it was a vertical fall, not a horizontal one]. if that were the case, it would have collapsed much slower - slowing down as it meets some resistance of the structure below. watch this series if you really want to challenge your assumptions. AE911TRUTH - at the Commonwealth Club - 1/6
ho2cultcha 1 year ago
Purdue's shift from public to private financing kills their objectivity. They have an aganda to protect their funding source(s).
Always follow the money....
AstralPlaner 1 year ago 2
This is the biggest piece of shit video I have ever watched... This doesn't explain building 7 which wasn't even hit by a plane and collapsed. Also, the vertical pressure on the soft beams wouldn't cause the entire building to fall, because surely the beams at the bottom of the building are strong enough to withstand ALL the vertical pressure of the building, or it would have collapsed simply from its own weight. This video ruins NationalGeographic's image. Share this knowledge!
brandonlikeduhh 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Highway420Music 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
thcbass420 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
please visit
theconspiracyexposed.blogspot. (com)
barquedust 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
lol so what if 9/11 is an inside job, doesn't change a fucking thing for me or anybody else.
wind767 2 years ago
There is an analysis of this smulation at: 911blogger/dot/com/node/9467.
University professors shouldn't sell out to the system.
JoeThePhilosopher 2 years ago
maybe where the airplane hit something gave fall
BKSmasher787 2 years ago
Still doesnt explain how both the buildings came straight down instead of sliding off to one side. Ok you got heat to soften the metal, then you got the wind rocking the towers, then with the fire adding internal pressure outward the beams should have Z-ed from the weight of the remaining tower above and rolled off a side. And Id like to see Purdue simulate Building7.
2drunksracing 2 years ago
Comment removed
SrpskaPedercina 2 years ago
I was going to rudly comment to you but then after checking your profile I felt sorry for you.......I found that ur a FAGGOT. Ever wonder What AIDS stands for?...Asshole Injected Death Sentence. You should know that god gave us all an A-hole for EXIT only. But if you keep forgetting just eat as much hot and spicy foods till ur stuffed. When you go to use the bathroom it will remind you what ur asshole is really used for.....enjoy!
2drunksracing 2 years ago
@2drunksracing your mean!!!
SrpskaPedercina 2 years ago
Buildings fall down, not to the side like jenga blocks
next time learn about reality before falling back on truther lies
wind does not rock the towers moron
Denierbud11 1 year ago
@Denierbud11 you obviously have never been in the towers or anything similar. of course wind moves the towers. they were built to move a small amount. on really stormy days, people would get seasick in the upper floors. steel does have some flexibility - which is a good thing.
ho2cultcha 1 year ago
@ho2cultcha
I have been in the towers and I have been in other large buildings. The towers donot rock with the wind, they will move a small amount, but I stand by my statement and do not know what you are getting at.
Denierbud11 1 year ago
What a waste of time. Purdue should crank out one of these for Building 7.
9/11=INSIDE JOB.
CaptianBuckSnort 2 years ago
Ya know good ol' Purdue had a major paradigm shift right around the time of 9-11.
They went from a publicly funded arrangement to soliciting and accepting large private donations.
I wonder if private donations are ever agenda driven?
I wonder...
Listen to how many assumptions are accepted as fact.
A total of 1% of the columns were even evaluated!
Everything is pure guess work by people that need additional private funding to exist.
Do the math..
AstralPlaner 2 years ago 2
@AstralPlaner
There is a thing in engineering called tendency! You model an equation for one event, you will find another similar event will act in almost the same exact way! That is how we model equations, to give us a mathematical answer for any event of that type. Yea sure there will be a percent error since no two things are the same, but that percent error is arbitrary when all factors are accounted for in the equation model.
MCH102690 11 months ago
@AstralPlaner Prove it.
Prove any of it.
someidiotchild 10 months ago
@AstralPlaner I wonder if private donations are ever agenda driven? THIS ENTIRE FUCKING GOVERNMENT IS AGENDA DRIVEN BY PRIVATE DONATIONS. LOL
I'm with you 100%. Half of this horseshit is GUESSES. They attach a university name to it to try to make it legitimate but it only shows what lying scum will do for money.
cadu1995 10 months ago 2
@AstralPlaner How did you figure that they only evaluated 1% of the columns?
tlages 8 months ago
@tlages NIST only had 236 samples of steel, and none of the core samples showed heating above 480 degrees F.
National Geographic couldn't make 180 pounds of thermite damage a steel column. Jonathan Cole cut a beam vertically with 2 pounds.
For more on Cole's work and three mainstream TV tests of thermite (mythbusters, National Geographic, and Jesse Ventura), and about the mysterious inability of world-class explosives experts to make thermite cut steel, see my video:
Incendiary Experiments
punxsutawneybarney 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AstralPlaner
I hope you realize you are a fucking Idiot. Purdue STILL is a publicly funded
university. Their simulations won SIGGRAPH awards, and their 3D model standards
are now World 3D standards that are used in ANY FEA software. LS-DYNA and
NASTRAN FEA software, the NIST BFRL Labs Fire Dynamics Simulator is FREE,
as are all federal developed software. IF you feel you can do better, download
them and have at it, because I would LOVE to see a simulation of NWO Ninjas.
Merlin5by5 5 months ago
Did that aluminum can not crush at all when it hit the steel? I would like to see video footage of that.
cmcm7677 2 years ago
Who the hell typed these captions? They are WAY off of what that lady is saying.
domki366 2 years ago
OK. the offer still stands. We will have to use an expert. Like say, oh, Pratt & Whitney (sp?) or Rolls Royce or GE, the companies that make jet engines and see what they say the temp of burning Jet fuel and how long it would take to burn 10,000 gallons of jet fuel. If the fuel was atomized (good nonsense word) in just a few seconds it would explode. Oh thats right all that fuel was transported (see Star Trek) into the delta quadrant along with all the Oxygen that would be required.
scalingup78 2 years ago
what temp does jet fuel burn at? 1200 degrees F. WRONG!!!! 900F tops. do your research.
fluxtor1 2 years ago 2
Propaganda Bullshit....
The fire was clearly starved for oxygen,the fuel burned quickly...
your "simulation" IS the conspiracy theory.....simulate blowin me!
high8us 2 years ago
This building was reinforced and protected for fires. The steel beams were insulated to prevent loss of structual integrity during a fire in the building. Oh. and what would normally be burning in a fire in the WTC? Ciggarettes, paper, office furniture, tacky corporate wall art. office machines. Nope! Nothing in the specs about any material being protected in case 10,000 gallons of burning jet fuel was delivered to the 93 floor by a 767.
scalingup78 2 years ago
Hey zip ty for brains. I will clean your bathroom with my toothbrush if you can produce any verifiable video that shows how the 10,000 gallons of jet fuel in 767 fuel tanks burns up in less than, oh I'll be very lax on time, less than 15 minutes. Oh, and what temp does jet fuel burn at? 1200 degrees F. And how hot does steel have to be before it begins to lose its structural integrity? (Starts to soften and bend under a load.) 750 degrees.
scalingup78 2 years ago
scalingup78.
i know this is 3weeks old.And I am no CT mind you.But is the offer still good ?
Jp5-Jp9 (jet fuel) burns less then 900f
carbon based anything way less then that.
Steel can give up some strength at 750f but thats anieling,And given the thickness/sive of those beens it would take days ( literaly days)
cont.
2ldr 2 years ago 2
cont.
As for the fuel 10,000 you said.I'm not sure excactly how much they had onboard at the time but lets say 10,000g
Most of that would have been atomized on impact going up in a huge fire ball lasting a few seconds.Not being around long enough to do what this video or anyone else is saying.
2ldr 2 years ago 2
@scalingup78 you fail big time. go back to physics and learn something this time.
ho2cultcha 1 year ago
at 3:50 he says the beams are unprotected. that is a bold face lie. ive seen the footage of the construction on youtube. and everyone of the 47 beams in the core of the building had a fireproof insulation on them.
thewrights1004 2 years ago
The beams had fire proofing on them, but it was blown off in the explosion.
rct3manofjapan 2 years ago
Hey you tube, replies should be posted with original comment not at the top.
tele544 2 years ago
lie lie and more lies and propaganda. What a croc of BS. Aluminum cans.? Computer rendering? more like CGI. and soo dramatic. Love the voiceover. No science here. NG should be ashamed of itself. I will never buy another magazine. More conspirators. How these people sleep at night I'll never know.
tele544 2 years ago
Why is National Geographic or certain elements within it, or in contact with it so obviously concerned about this? Why so devoted to proving that 19 hijackers brought down the building. Why don't they just cue up flight 175 from CNN's film "America Remembers", and slow it way down and zoom in really close to the plane so we can all see the bottom? Look for that video clip on Youtube, and you'll understand what this N.G. documentary is all about.
yawnhockel 2 years ago
@yawnhockel your questions are good. not sure about your conclusions... i lost a lot of respect for ng when this video came out - and i grew up w/ every ng magazine since 1904 - reading every single one of them since. ng is a patron saint in my family, but this video is a travesty of lies and disillusionment.
ho2cultcha 1 year ago
Crap in, crap out. That's what happens with a computer. Half of the fuel should of burned up with the explosion and not inside the building as the graphics in this vid incorrectly show.
VexRiot 2 years ago
"widespread fires initiated by the jet feul, weakened the steel collumns, and brought down the WTC." Okay this is quite a leap to make. They expect us to believe that some weak columns on just a section of a few floors was enough to bring down these massive structures at the rate of gravity. If you believe that then you need to go back and take high school physics again, because obviously you've missed something. Unbelievable.
thirdeyecandy 2 years ago 2
the temperatures of the fires inside the wtc reached 1800f which is enough to weaken the steal up to 90 percent. thats only having 10 percent of the original designs rigidity. you could see the tower bowing. theres nothing unbelievable otherwise. if you care to bring this debate to PM please do so
NewGameReleases 2 years ago
US banks billed their customers 24 billion dollars in penalty fees for overdrawing their accounts last year, a 35 percent increase over the previous year, a study has found.
Fees are charged whether the overdraft is for five dollars or 50 dollars.
These practices are especially alarming given that institutions automatically enroll consumers into this type of program, even when lower-cost forms of overdraft protection are usually available.
wilsonpwt 2 years ago
Over thinking over analyzing seperates the body from the mind people. Ya its deff for sure from a song. But it makes sence and i understand it. No 2nd meaning in anything that happened. Bush is responcible for 911. End of story.
TOOL3rdEyeDmt 2 years ago
which is why many believe that there is no way the plane completely went inside the building with no pieces or debris on the outside of the building. We are supposed to also believe that the resulting crash and fuel burning collapsed three buildings but at the pentagon it did not even burn paper, wood computers in the building immediately next to where the plane supposedly is.
galilaya42 2 years ago
Have none of these so called scientists heard of heat conduction? The heat that was received by any of the steel would be immediately conducted through the whole steel structure, thus not allowing the steel to get to those temperatures since the heat would be continually be conducted away. The steel were continuous columns and were connected to the whole massive (several thousand tons of steel). Why do these folk keep trying to fool everyone.
ekdilwalla 2 years ago
what I mean by crappy job is not the amount of destruction and lives lost. obviously that was massive. I mean what a bad job they did of making it look like someone else did it. If there were not so many things that happened that day that had never happened b4, It would be easier to believe it was the way they said. Again I would rather believe this was NOT done by our own people, I just cant. I wont believe lies to make my world feel safer. this video proves nothing. doesn't simulate collapse
galilaya42 2 years ago
Al these patriots that you hate and call nuts are the people you are going to turn to when the shit really hits the fan. They are the ones preparing. You will be begging them to save your asses and wishing you had listened. You can call them and me whatever you want but why do you hate people just because when they see something that is BS they say hey thats BS? The only thing that makes me think Maybe it was terrorists is what a crappy job they did pulling this off.
galilaya42 2 years ago
Truthfully, you think people want to believe that this was carried out by our own people? NO! I have children. I dont want to believe that we live in a country where this would happen but they expect us to swallow way too much. Way to many unanswered questions. I mean 1 building falling in a way no other building, struck by a plane, has ever fallen is hard enough to believe. We are supposed to believe that 3 did from 2 planes?!?! come on how do people not question that? wake up
galilaya42 2 years ago
I dont understand when he says (2:49) that their simulation of the broken broken beams coincide almost exactly with the broken beams at the wtc. how would they know which beams were actually broken at the wtc?
galilaya42 2 years ago
How the hell did the plane manage to sever the steel beams at the World Trade Centers, but at the Pentagon, the beams severed the wings, yet they were smaller and weaker than those at the two towers?
Secondly, the beam used in the experiment was fucking tiny and it took hours for it to melt and finally buckle, yet the first tower came down in minutes! We are made to believe that jet fuel brought temperatures of 2000 degrees, yet firefighters called from those places where it was 2000 degrees BS
imhighonhappy 2 years ago
where do you get that the Pentagon (!) is built weaker than a commercial building? The Pentagon is constructed like a fortress. I have worked in/on the Pentagon as a contractor and it is built like nothing you have seen for strength.
lvgordo 2 years ago
How is it that traces of nanothermite were found in the rubble of the world trade centers? The media reported on the collapse of building 7 as the building was in the background behind the reporter! It was a controlled demolition. Jet fuel is not what caused a building which was not hit by a plane to collapse symetrically. Nanothermite brought down building 7 and 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB!!!
imhighonhappy 2 years ago
and the section that was hit had just undergone
"reinforcement". Why that section? No wing penetration, no marks on the building, and no wings on the ground. What happened to the wings? Magic?
tele544 2 years ago
even if this BS was true explain building 7 ..... 90% of people belives in god .. that means they belive almost everything they feed them
hellwiki 2 years ago
Well thank god for the swine flu. All the twoofers wont get the vaccine and die. Then we can all live in peace without these conspiracy nuts blabbering on about chemtrails and crap.
femacamps4ever 2 years ago 2
thats a good point. if only there was a death disease that only hits people with that level of dumb to believe it was a conspiracy....
The61769 2 years ago 9
@The61769
Ur very gullible aren't u
4444mrryan 11 months ago
@The61769 And everything truthers claim is facts backed with evidene? I haven't heard anything a truther say that sounds convincing. The day a truther provide some believable evidence I will start listening to them, sort of.
LAGunBroker 9 months ago
@The61769 Wow, screw you human being.
punjedi 9 months ago
@The61769 "thats a good point. if only there was a death disease that only hits people with that level of dumb to believe it was a conspiracy...."
This is old I know.
What (Theorists) do, is link all intelligence investigating the (9/11) attacks before they took place, and claim it's proof of prier knowledge. The problem with the *Real* truth here is, they ignore the fact, Intel didn't have (When and How.)
They only knew where. Might as well be dead, not having the key knowledge they needed.
FievelJ69 6 months ago
@The61769 So even though they did know the main target was the WTC, they hadn't known how.
They were getting close,, they missed. It was inevitable that a large scale terrorist attack would eventually get through... and they knew it.
The real secrete, was trying to keep (Terrorist) threats a secrete.
People slept better that way..
FievelJ69 6 months ago
@FievelJ69 Of course they knew it was WTC.. They planned this for a very long time.
1994 WTC bomb was built by our very own FBI. The recorded phone calls proving this can be found on the web. The only fault of the 94 bomb, it wasnt put in the correct location.
Clinton knew about this illegal war and attempted to start it immediatly after his inauguration.
Bush Sr, was the first to start this illegal war with Desert Storm. Even though congress NEVER declared war.
JonnyPitiful 3 months ago
@JonnyPitiful "1994 WTC bomb was built by our very own FBI."
1993 DUMB ASS!!!!!!
FievelJ69 3 months ago
@FievelJ69 lol, true, sorry. was 1993. Still a bomb built by our own FBI.
JonnyPitiful 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@JonnyPitiful "lol, true, sorry. was 1993. Still a bomb built by our own FBI. "
Sorry but it wasn't our FBI
Look At My Response Time, It'll Probably Be Longer Next Time.
That Shows How Much I Want To Deal With Some Certain Conspiracy Nuts.
FievelJ69 2 months ago
the key to the tower tragedy is revealed in the collapse of building 7. Without question it was a planned demoliton in building 7. No one in the science, design, or physics community believes otherwise to my knowlege. The question is who planned this and what cooperation did they have here.?
gizmoides 2 years ago
And BTW - it has now been shown through peer reviewed scientific research that there was unexploded nano thermite in multiple dust samples from the WTC. So how about we cut out the kiddie shit and have a real investigation?
mule1969 2 years ago 2
Both 110 story buildings collapsed in just over 10 seconds - slighty less than free fall. The tops of the towers did not fall over, but collapsed through the path of greatest resistance - 70 to 85 floors of undamaged concrete, un-"softened" steel and glass, with all 110 stories being turned to dust. This little soda can test doesn't explain that. I'm disappointed in you National Geographic. For shame.
mule1969 2 years ago
What degree do you have? I must be better than these people, ya know, since your so right.
mattsack123 2 years ago
You dont need a degree to see the obvious. Everything he stated is obvious and admitted in the official report. They just failed to explain how this would be possible through a gravity driven collapse. It is not plausible that the building could fall at near free fall speed straight through steel beams and concrete. Take a sec and think about it. How can something fall through solid floors and beams as fast as something falling through purely air as resistance? Don't need a degree for that one.
skauma 2 years ago
Oh here we go with another arm chair engineer, free fall?? i think not, look at the collapse and notice the debris that are falling down all around the building, the debris are falling much faster then the actual building. Why you ask? because the debris are falling at free fall speeds NOT the building.
JLaw012 2 years ago
The reason why the towers fell was because they made them cheap.If they made them out of the same material and layout as the Empire state building they would still be standing. If you didnt know a plane crashed in the empire state building.The pilot was blinded by fog and crashed but THAT building is still standing! I rest my case...
shadowcaster12 2 years ago
if you think the government did it, get out of the country... u communists!!!
why would a government do that? there is no gain, and it is proven that the muslims planed this, it was on a laptop found in the guys house, h guy who planed many attacks, and tried a few, 1993, two towers
playmaker1013 2 years ago
yall are idiots... it was an attack by muslim extremists, planed by the same guy who attacked the towers in 1993
playmaker1013 2 years ago
You commenters are all nothing but just paranoid freaks. This anamation uses EVERY SINGLE law of physics possible. And every time you are presented with the facts, you just deny them and make outrageous claims. You people sicken me.
mjbmdct58 2 years ago
if thats the reasoning for the towers falling then how come they fell down in a perfect line . most buildings when they collapse fall to the side. only controlled "demolitions" (keyword) fall straight down. another thing is the beams of the towers. if you looks at pics of the rubble of the towers after they fell, the beams sticking out, look cut, perfectly cut, just like they do in demolitions. they set up explosives to cut the beams like that and they do pre-cutting as well
KRAAYON0117 2 years ago
computer graphics are interesting but physics is more important. Hundreds of tons of steel vs. aluminum and kerosene. If fires can bring down steel frame buildings, why has it not happened before or since? It is physically impossible, or otherwise we'd all be afraid to live and work in high rise buildings.
ezzstreet 2 years ago 2
I'm sure a bunch of people at Purdue didn't think to take physics into account. You're probably correct on this one. I'm guessing all the modeling they did was just to make the graphics prettier, not to make the data model more robust.
buttaflutta 2 years ago
dude when the fuel hit the tower the tank blew up when they hit the core but it didn't when it first impact
rockets6743 2 years ago
The description needs to be fixed, this is a simulation of the impact not the collapse. I watched this entire documentary. There is no simulation of the burning and collapse.
Numarx 2 years ago
So where did the molten metal come from? Why was so hot in the basement 3 days later?? Why is the base of the core cut at an angel?? Why are there explosions going down the building? Why did fire fighters reach the impact hole on tower 1 when "Jet Fuel" was in the stair cases? So many unanswer questions and alot of cover ups.
mustafaopw 2 years ago
What you all kiddies don't understand.
Is that Purdue's simulation DID NOT INCLUDE the building's CORE.
Where in the bloody hell is the core?
Also, all that fuel burned up when the 767 crashed on impact. Why do you think there was such a large fireball after impact?
Also, the black smoke is not an indication of jet fuel. Ethanol fuel doesn't burn black. Black smoke means that the fire is starving itself of oxygen and its dissipating, with temps of 500F.
500F fires do not melt nor weaken stl
ArcanineKing 2 years ago
This is interesting. People should understand that NIST claims that the plane cut the building in half. Then, the second half of the building fell 1-10 floors on to the bottom half of the building. Then, the force caused the bottom half to shatter and collapse. If this were true, the top half would meet and equal and opposite force when it fell onto the bottom half - Thus, slowing it down or stopping it when it hits. This does not happen. The top drops at free fall speed as if it were demolished
zwest135 2 years ago
They should also recognize that the open chemistry and physics journal found Active nano thermite in the debris. This is very important because this stuff is used in demolitons. Not only this, but its a very advanced material. I also want to point out building 7's disintegration into dust. It was not even hit by a plane. There is no logical reason for that building to disintegrate, unless we take into account the thermite and melted steel in the debris pointing to a demolition.
zwest135 2 years ago
I hate conspiracy theorists!
itsWetWilly 2 years ago
i would rather be annoyed as all hell than have nobody ask the tough questions
thefonzie111 2 years ago
Diamond- u r a total asshole & i hope that u burn in hell eternally.
ed11561 2 years ago
We need a simulation to show us what we saw on live TV? Why?
Ne0mega 2 years ago
If you have a end product you want to show it, you can make a computer model show anything and list it as proof.
Hollow aluminum wings will cut steel? A telephone pole can cut a wing off.
Cartoon cutouts are just that. a cartoon.
b24line 2 years ago
those fires where only 600-800 degrees, and to melt steel it takes 2000 degrees and even if it was weakened they would have stayed in place because its not like every part of the long ass beams where on fire
AKATECHSUPPORT 2 years ago
Fucking 9/11 truthers dont even bother with them "th goviment goin get us"
Boinkmakr 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
there was an investigation done recently that said debris and fires led to the collapse of wtc 7
BULLSHIT-WHO DID THE INVESTIGATION&WHAT PART DID THEY HAVE IN THE COVERUP?HOW MUCH WERE THEY PAID BY THE GOVERNMENT?R U TRULY THAT FUCKING STUPID?
THERE IS NO TAPE OF A PLANE HITTING THE PENTAGON U MORON.THERE WERE OVER 30 TAPES THAT WERE NOT RELEASED HOWEVER.AND THE EYEWITNESSES TESTIFIED TO THE EXACT OPOSITE OF THE OFFICIAL STORY.U HAVE 2 B A TOTAL FUCKING MORON.2 B THAT STUPID.
ed11561 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What can be proved is that the government LIED THEIR ASS OFF.The 911 Commissioner Thomas Keene said that the commission was a farce because the Bush Cabal would not provide ANY INFORMATION WHATSOEVER.
100% COVERUP-4 WHAT REASON?WHO IS GUILTY?WHO WAS PROMOTED-EVERYONE.
Who was held responsible?NOBODY.
How many questions were answered-NONE>ALL BULLSHIT.-JUST LIKE THIS VIDEO.
WTC7-COLLAPSED LIKE A FUCKING DEMOLITION EXACTLY.ALL LIES
ed11561 2 years ago
Military Field Manual FM 5-250; Explosives and Demolitions, June 1992: Page 86
3-6. Steel-Cutting Charges.
(d) Nickel-molybdenum steel. This type of steel cannot be cut easily by conventional steel-cutting charges. . . . . However, the saddle charge will not cut nickel-molybdenum shafts. Therefore, use some method other than explosives to cut nickel-molybdenum steel, such as THERMITE or acetylene or electrical cutting tools.
TheDreamslaughter 2 years ago
damn, at the two minute mark, the fiction begins:
Aluminum airplane wings will not pierce a building.
Anyone who knows about aviation or architecture can tell you these explanations are brainwashing for simpletons.
jet fuel doesn't burn at a high enough temperature to melt steel.
why are people so gullible?
satinhooks 2 years ago
In the video simulation, after the wings have been demolished by the external support columns, they continue inside. Inside, ALL the wing parts destroy ALL the internal columns. This is absurd on it's face.
TheDreamslaughter 2 years ago
are you fucking stupid ?wings were destroyed but the sheer force destroyed them
do you seriously expect the plane to be like a beer can against concrete just squishing into the side
Boinkmakr 2 years ago
yes, some of the plane should have bounced off and fallen to the ground.
aluminum airplane wings wont pierce a steel frame building. the towers were designed to withstand MULTIPLE collisions with jumbo jets.
none of the 3 buildings should have collapsed into themselves either. there are no steel framed buildings in the world that have collapsed because of internal fires. none. there's footage on youtube of one burning for days.
u probably believe people die from marijuana overdoses too.
satinhooks 2 years ago
even if the wings were made from aluminum the jet fuel filled wings were extremely hard and hit very fast
Boinkmakr 2 years ago
the wings were destroyed but the sheer force and the jet fuel cut the collums
Boinkmakr 2 years ago
jet fuel cut the collums
LOL U R A MORON.
ed11561 2 years ago
Learn fluid dynamics you fucking moron before you make yourself look even more stupid .
Fuel encased in aluminum traveling at high speed can cut steel as shown in the video. Unless the university is part of the cover up and all that is video editing like the fake planes.
Boinkmakr 2 years ago
Fuel encased in aluminum traveling at high speed can cut steel as shown in the video-LOL
What an asshole u r.Fuel encased in aluminum?
U truly r a moron.What the fuck kind of scienec is that jerkoff.?totally dumb-just like u.
What was the steel?What quality?What thickness?What thickness was the aluminum?There r so many different variables u dumb fuck that it proves NOTHING ASSWIPE.
ed11561 2 years ago
Dude you are unleashing the fury the the CAPS lock key. And yes the wings would have cut the steel we good damned saw it on live tv (well I did you argue like you are 12)unless all that was photoshop
Boinkmakr 2 years ago
Ther wings did not CUT THE STEEL GENIUS,The wings went THROUGH THE STEEL.If u can't see the difference between the 2 -u r utterly hopeless.
WINGS DON'T CUT STEEL-They fly right thru them.
AND DON'T WORRY ABOUT MY CAPS LOCK MORON.
ed11561 2 years ago
FLUID DYNAMICS?lol ALL U CAN DO IS MAKE VIDEO GAMES U DUMB FUCK.Worthless channel page asswipe.I'll bet u believe NIST and the 911 commission too right asswipe? loser
ed11561 2 years ago
Oh great Ad-Ad-hominem attacks, straw man claims and childish personal messages and comments on my profile .I'm not going to bother with you you sir are a fucking imbecile.
Boinkmakr 2 years ago
bOINKEY.....GO FUCK YOURSELF ASSWIPE.
ed11561 2 years ago
im guessing you are around 12?
TheCommentifyer 2 years ago
Dude get a life you do nothing but favorite every crackpot conspiracy without looking at it logically ....a 12 year old rebel without a cause
grow up
Boinkmakr 2 years ago
I have a life asshole-u don't know how i favorite any video asswipe.But u can basically mind your own business schmuck.Funny how my site seems so important to a wimp like u. lol
ed11561 2 years ago
Yeah i can't wait to grow up like you and have nothing but GRAND THEFT AUTO-a fucking video game all over my page-lol-loser.N u call me a 12 year old-lol-u don't even rate that high cocksnot. lol
ed11561 2 years ago
Dude im ending this you cannon respond to reason and end up doing ad homenim attacks
you sir are an idiot.
Boinkmakr 2 years ago
satinhooks 2 years ago
excellent point.
eerietube 2 years ago
how do you expect to find all the plane piece in all of that.
there was an investigation done recently that said debris and fires led to the collapse of wtc 7
it did not fall at free fall speed
debris and fire
tape of plane hitting pentagon+photos of debris, eye witnesses and broken light posts
TheCommentifyer 2 years ago
are you saying it did't fall at free fall speed so that you can sleep better at night or are you blind?
there were buildings surrounding the towers when they fell. some of them caught fire and had HUGE chunks missing out of them. they didn't fall.
and there's building 7 a block away that mysteriously caught fire and collapsed on itself.
listen, steel framed buildings CAN'T just collapse. They can burn all the way through for days without falling.
what independent group conducted your study?
satinhooks 2 years ago
look it up, there is a video that times the collapse on here, it take double free fall.
you tube won't let me post links in the comments.
TheCommentifyer 2 years ago
Double free fall? Bullshit.Can't find the proof?What else is new?Besides there r 3 buildings that were demolished that day.Which 1 u talking about.3 steel buildings all collapsed at basically free fall speed-(look up Richard Gage-engneer&architect) ONE OF WHICH WAS NEVER HIT BY A PLANE OR ANY SIZEABLE AMOUNT OF ANY DEBRIS WITH FIRES ON only 3 floors barely burning.But that fucker came down at free fall speed.hardly any damage.911 was an inside job.
ed11561 2 years ago
i will send you a link, it has the video of the fall(NOT FREEFALL) and explains everything
911 was not an inside job.
TheCommentifyer 2 years ago
911 WAS A TOTAL INSIDE JOB.
ed11561 2 years ago
you have friend lock on so i cannot send the link.
TheCommentifyer 2 years ago
there was an investigation done recently that said debris and fires led to the collapse of wtc 7
BULLSHIT-WHO DID THE INVESTIGATION&WHAT PART DID THEY HAVE IN THE COVERUP?HOW MUCH WERE THEY PAID BY THE GOVERNMENT?R U TRULY THAT FUCKING STUPID?
THERE IS NO TAPE OF A PLANE HITTING THE PENTAGON U MORON.THERE WERE OVER 30 TAPES THAT WERE NOT RELEASED HOWEVER.AND THE EYEWITNESSES TESTIFIED TO THE EXACT OPOSITE OF THE OFFICIAL STORY.U HAVE 2 B A TOTAL FUCKING MORON.2 B THAT STUPID.
ed11561 2 years ago
What, without insulation? Notice how the old man says that the steel columns were not insulated, why would they be insulated? All the columns were wrapped in asbestos, not insulation. That was a safety measure back in the early 70's to prevent this scenario from even happening. Asbestos did not become illegal to use until 1989. If they were required to remove the asbestos it would have cost more than to demolish the structures and rebuild them. Silverstein, is on the board of that insurance Co!
GateMessenger 2 years ago
Also Purdue did not even show the fuel being ignited outside the tower during impact like videos show. All of the fuel according to their models ignited inside the structure.
Making up information without using observational data is not a scientific method. Thus their model is not scientific.
GateMessenger 2 years ago
shape charges
weedruner 2 years ago
You see, not all of the structural points could have equally melted in such an uncontrolled blaze of fire. If the buildings were to fall in on themselves, that would mean that all vital structural points would have had to fail equally around the perimeter of the building for many several floors. We know the fires did not burn this way, so toppling into it's own foot print is impossible according to the "Official Story".
As for the falling speed, look into the Law Of Falling Bodies.
DLC77 2 years ago
My understanding is that the buildings were designed so that the center supports were the major load-bearing structures. Once the steel weakened enough so that the first of the floors collapsed, I would expect the floor to star