Added: 5 months ago
From: AssociatedPress
Views: 3,673
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (29)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • YANKEES ARE SUCH FUCKING FAGS! LOL! lolzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz­zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz­zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

  • I think it would be less appropriate if the New York Jets done a tribute

  • "The FBI issued a BOLO on suspected terrorists driving a white delivery van from New York City to the Mexican border. The suspects are using Israeli passports. They are armed and dangerous."- Knox County TN 911 Dispatch, Sept 11, 2001, 11am EST. "We've never made the case that Osama bin Laden was involved in 9/11. That evidence has never been forthcoming." Dick Cheney, "Interview of the Vice President by Tony Snow", WhiteHouse 60t gov, Mar 29, 2006

  • They are people who study. They aren't consumers of mainstream garbage. Jet fuel burns at 1148 degrees. You don't melt structural steel, 110 stories of it, with 'jet-A' fuel. But then you do bomb innocent children while sleeping in their beds. Why is that? Because you are consumers. You don't want the truth, you want to win. What are we winning? Think for your self. This is Propaganda, Plain and Simple. Enjoy

  • @Khal03 Liar!!! No one is claiming that 110 stories of structural steel "melted." "Above and below the impact floors, the cores consisted of what were essentially two rigid boxes; the steel in these sections was undamaged and had undergone no significant heating. The section between them, however, had sustained significant damage and, though they were not hot enough to melt it, the fires were weakening the structural steel." (cont)

  • @Khal03 (cont) "Meanwhile, the perimeter columns and floors were also being weakened by the heat of the fires, and as the floors began to sag they pulled the exterior walls inwards." You are using a "straw mans argument" no one actually claims that 110 stories of structural steel "melted."

    Anything else? Passenger jets didn't actually hit the towers after all, it was really missiles fired by Bush, right? :)

  • @landline00 Listen, for the benefit of those who would pass by and read this, I will explain: so, speaking of "straw mans arguments" if we ignore the lie "the perimeter columns and floors were also being weakened by the heat of the fires, and as the floors began to sag" and pretend like kerosene could even "weaken" structural steel, we are talking about localized weakness. Why did the other 100 odd stories disappear from under the "weakened" area? Controlled Demolition - Called Pancake Theory.

  • Furthermore, if you look at all the video evidence, you can see people in the gash in the building waving their hands in desperation because of the dense black smoke. Even community college welding student drop-outs know that a black sooty fire is a sign of a cold, oxygen starved fire; A 'Carburizing Fire/Flame". They would also understand that in this zone, the temp wouldn't be more than 500 or 600 degrees, since there wasn't any substantial flame visible after the impact.

  • I'm using founded scientific forensic methods and I am telling you if a human can stand in the hole and choke on smoke rather than having their flesh roasted then it surely won't melt steel. And then there is the fact that the fire dpt. thought they could put the fire out when they got to the 78th floor (i may be wrong about the exact floor) with "two lines". He's looking at a fire you say will destroy a steel and concrete building and he's like, "I need two lines, we can put it down."

  • @Khal03 So, why did you write in your first post, "You don't melt structural steel, 110 stories of it, with 'jet-A' fuel." when no one is making that claim in the first place? Why did you have to exaggerate to make your initial point? As far as what was happening internally as a result two jetliners hitting a 110 story tube-frame structural system skyscraper at 550MPH, I'm sorry but I don't think you can use "community college dropout" expertise to get the entire picture. (cont)

  • @Khal03 (cont) You also conveniently neglect to mention that “The fire caused steel structural elements, already weakened from the plane impact, to fail.” You see, most of the structural support of the towers was in the load-bearing walls that were obviously compromised when planes hit them at 500MPH. You’re so dishonest and disingenuous. Wait... that's what 9-11 Truth is all about! :)

  • May they all rest in peace

  • Go to AWAREOFTRUTH. COM---For an Alternative view.

  • @AWAREOFTRUTHdotCOM There is no credible alternate view; just dickheads like you proposing straw man's arguments, making stuff up, and taking things out of context.

  • @landline00 You are a sad face clown. Relax, maybe truth is not for you. I bet you love the USA too, haha. When you get some brains, hit me up.

  • @AWAREOFTRUTHdotCOM Your blog is joke, right? All that stuff about "Illuminati?" And btw, Obama and the Dems can change the system because right now they are the system.

  • why dislike you ******* heads

  • @cofa74 they're nutjobs who think our own country attacked it's self.

  • @mr94hitman Fucking psychos who watch to much news

  • @mr94hitman Truthers suck!!!

  • @landline00 Agreed.

  • Comment removed

  • @landline00 Lol I love how they removed your comment.

  • as opposed to liars? What a country!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more