where is the proof ? we just saw 5 sec footage of a crashtest without any speed informations. plus the TATA NANO looks like a shopping cart :D - and is slow as fuck with its 33Hp engine - and lost its wiper, door panel and door opener - and you still can not open the backseat´s windows. and the tata nano caught fire in its first road test
YEAH - now that´s quality ! the only thing this piece of shit is good for is mpg. in any other aspect it sucks. I´d rather buy a used E36 3er BMW for 2000€
I just had to laugh out loud when I went through the list at the end and saw the Nano being proudly touted as being safer than a Rickshaw. A friggin' Rickshaw! LOL!
That's coz u were born with a silver spoon.. the Nano's a blessing for millions of people who would otherwise have to carry around their entire family on half a scooter.. but u wouldnt care about them, now, would u?
There is evidence that this wasnt done at 5 km/h. (lol)
To solve your problems, watch closely people who dont believe in the test, The rear of the car rose up, indicating it was a speed high enough to make it go up.
And people who do like this car, stop claiming that it's safe! it was just a full frontal test, you still dont know if it will do well in an offset crash.
This is really not that safe at high speeds. Tata said that it did only the full frontal crash test and it exceeded the safety in india. Thats really really poor safety in india. many sad here that its good that the car wont crush. WRONG. No crumple zones is a bad thing as if it crumples, it absorbs most of the shock of the impact or else, all the shock goes to your head. Around 75G and your history. Tata said that airbags and abs are not required for safety. Thats stupid. Also Im from INDIA.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Only reason this thing sells in India is because it's an Indian company selling it, and because Indians are only capable of short-term thinking as of now.
Was this d Chinese or the Indian one. All I saw was chinese scripts....ok tata must have copied from a cheap chinese car and name it nano. haha india is not too far behind in copying things...but yes they are worst then the chinese.
What the heck....i have better things to do in life instead of wasting my time watching this waste. So chill dude...Tata Nano Rocks man...u win....kudos to ur video...this thing is even going to sell in Mars.
Have you ever crashed with a Tata Nano before ? If you did then I will believe you. Yes you are right not any Ferreari of of $100.000 will survive a crash with speed above 80km/hr will survive cos they aren't not designed for this but for pure sport and speed, The Tata nano is design for economic and not for crash. At least if you want to paid 5.6 millions for a main battle tank . Can you produce a safety car with the budget under $2.000? It's the reality.
I can't see your point! you can buy a $100,0000 ferrari and you are driving an aluminum car. So your point is shit. I trust Tata more than a toyota when it comes to safety. I am not Indian if thats what you are thinking!
I'd take a look at one if they sold them here but seriously, what speed was that crash test at? 20Mph? Cause it barely did anything to the car, which isn't a good thing if it was fast (no crumple zones).
see... d guy who having mercedes, wil not even gonna see it, but the guy who cant even effort a bike and anyhow he managed to take this nano, so for him, this is only his mercedes, so airbags needed for rich fools... not for safe indians!!
i have a good ole AMERICAN Chevrolet Cheyenne gas guzzlin V8 4x4 with a 5 on the floor and posi in the rear. and it seems you were a little quick to get some sort of a meaning out of my cuss rant...seems you are the one who fucks his parents? getting that checked with a doctor? and i love the fact that you always assume all Americans drive hummers...oh dear, the miseducted
:) dude, if you do not have an airbag and seat belt on and you crash into a static object capable of putting you to a halt... at less than 15 KMPH, your legs' bone fragments will be embroidered in the dashboard and I am talking about tough cars. In the same scenario with a Nano, your bone fragments will be reduced to dust and fly with the wind before an ambulance arrives. This car is equivalent to sitting on an unstoppable four wheel frame going on to hit a brick wall.
Are you kidding me? 105 kmph without airbag coming out? As I said, either the car crashes into wall at speed of 5 m/hr, or it does not equiped with airbag at all!!
That was only 30mph. The nano doesn't even have airbags. The whole car is a crumple zone at 60mph
BigCheeseHead00 4 weeks ago
Admit it, the tata nano is not a good car
moviewatcher1024 1 month ago
this pc of shit caught ablaze on several occasions as soon as they're rolled out of the dealers. - a moving box for indian style cremation!
/watch?v=U-tNcW51iRQ&nofeather
Telears 1 year ago
where is the proof ? we just saw 5 sec footage of a crashtest without any speed informations. plus the TATA NANO looks like a shopping cart :D - and is slow as fuck with its 33Hp engine - and lost its wiper, door panel and door opener - and you still can not open the backseat´s windows. and the tata nano caught fire in its first road test
YEAH - now that´s quality ! the only thing this piece of shit is good for is mpg. in any other aspect it sucks. I´d rather buy a used E36 3er BMW for 2000€
3O2MuStAnG 1 year ago
@3O2MuStAnG ---this is a old video, please wathc the new video!!
abh3092 1 year ago
indian crap copied from chinese crap copied from indian crap copied from .... who cares its fuck ugly and for poor people....
DumbYankies 1 year ago
Ugliest car in the world.
AAmed1980 1 year ago
I just had to laugh out loud when I went through the list at the end and saw the Nano being proudly touted as being safer than a Rickshaw. A friggin' Rickshaw! LOL!
vito1860 2 years ago 5
it's auto rickshaw and not plain rikshaw
in india auto rickshaw are made by BAJAJ company and is more expensive than a NANO
abh3092 2 years ago 2
I can't image dumbass that gonna buy that shit.
AlexTheZebra 2 years ago
dumbass who like safety
SteamLog 2 years ago
That's coz u were born with a silver spoon.. the Nano's a blessing for millions of people who would otherwise have to carry around their entire family on half a scooter.. but u wouldnt care about them, now, would u?
shirazhansen 2 years ago 12
@shirazhansen nano shud be banned, now we have more cars on the road and cheap sluts like nano wud worsen the traffic on roads.
& now you've got people who cudnt dream of buying a car in their life driving one (it gud) but these motherfuckers have airs about it??? fukin maggots
TheBabumushai 2 years ago
Well, people who would have probably enjoy the fun and novelty factors.
And if it really costs $2500 or something like that it could just be an impulse buy for some. I mean - full frame digital cameras cost more.
ceeam 2 years ago
thats the whole fucking point, so even poor people like you can buy a car.
chakdemumbai234 1 year ago
If you don't believe this, watch the crash test done by Autocar Uk on Youtube. This car is very very strong.
maltese85 2 years ago
I like my opel agila .. even if it's ugly
mef444 2 years ago
There is evidence that this wasnt done at 5 km/h. (lol)
To solve your problems, watch closely people who dont believe in the test, The rear of the car rose up, indicating it was a speed high enough to make it go up.
And people who do like this car, stop claiming that it's safe! it was just a full frontal test, you still dont know if it will do well in an offset crash.
mumuch4ch4 2 years ago
Probably 40 kph.
whattheheck1000 2 years ago
wrong 35mph...european front and side impact crash test...
movieguy7589 2 years ago
how many camels is it gona cost me to get one?
Ari2Lion 2 years ago 3
@Ari2Lion LOL, if it was up to me, i'd rather ride a camel than a tata lol.
M3diaCultur3 1 year ago
that crash was 5mph........
x73 2 years ago
Hahaha 2 Kmh:::
DAIHATSUMEMBER 2 years ago
This is really not that safe at high speeds. Tata said that it did only the full frontal crash test and it exceeded the safety in india. Thats really really poor safety in india. many sad here that its good that the car wont crush. WRONG. No crumple zones is a bad thing as if it crumples, it absorbs most of the shock of the impact or else, all the shock goes to your head. Around 75G and your history. Tata said that airbags and abs are not required for safety. Thats stupid. Also Im from INDIA.
lifenexus 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Only reason this thing sells in India is because it's an Indian company selling it, and because Indians are only capable of short-term thinking as of now.
what77777 2 years ago
here here!
bashes1 2 years ago
pretty impressive for the low price IMO
josiahsuarez 2 years ago 2
wtf...that tin can drove into a mattress at 1kmph.
meethoonda 2 years ago
say say whatever you want
it is selling like hot cakes in india
abh3092 2 years ago
this dont mean it's good btw.
mastifiorulamitongla 2 years ago
Was this d Chinese or the Indian one. All I saw was chinese scripts....ok tata must have copied from a cheap chinese car and name it nano. haha india is not too far behind in copying things...but yes they are worst then the chinese.
meethoonda 2 years ago
you are warned for trolling!!!
abh3092 2 years ago
Okey
meethoonda 2 years ago
What the heck....i have better things to do in life instead of wasting my time watching this waste. So chill dude...Tata Nano Rocks man...u win....kudos to ur video...this thing is even going to sell in Mars.
meethoonda 2 years ago
hahahaha
jealous westerners
abh3092 2 years ago
omg ..that car crashed at 5 kmph
snipervib 2 years ago
You people never seen or touched a TATA car that's why you talk like this. I have never seen strong cars than Tata.
flip2mac 2 years ago 2
Have you ever crashed with a Tata Nano before ? If you did then I will believe you. Yes you are right not any Ferreari of of $100.000 will survive a crash with speed above 80km/hr will survive cos they aren't not designed for this but for pure sport and speed, The Tata nano is design for economic and not for crash. At least if you want to paid 5.6 millions for a main battle tank . Can you produce a safety car with the budget under $2.000? It's the reality.
bunnyrabbit008 2 years ago
It's very simple " What you paid is what you get "
bunnyrabbit008 2 years ago
I can't see your point! you can buy a $100,0000 ferrari and you are driving an aluminum car. So your point is shit. I trust Tata more than a toyota when it comes to safety. I am not Indian if thats what you are thinking!
flip2mac 2 years ago
I'd take a look at one if they sold them here but seriously, what speed was that crash test at? 20Mph? Cause it barely did anything to the car, which isn't a good thing if it was fast (no crumple zones).
FusilliJerry82 2 years ago
Well, the crash test shows that it won't totally crush itself under its own weight (well, for this car, would be extremely low).
Add the weight of a passengers+baggage...double the weight? (exponentially increases the impact force).
How about if a *normal* car hits it?
sillygates 2 years ago
see... d guy who having mercedes, wil not even gonna see it, but the guy who cant even effort a bike and anyhow he managed to take this nano, so for him, this is only his mercedes, so airbags needed for rich fools... not for safe indians!!
vikhyat0001 2 years ago
aahahah ill pay for your english lessons, no worries... LEARN TO SPELL... ahahahahah
idiot...
DARKRIGUE 2 years ago
no proof you fuckposting assfucking bitchassing fuckgaying shitfucking cumguzzling fuckwhore. take you nano and put it up your loose gay ass
BlackLabel7345 2 years ago
so u were fucking ur dad or ur mom???
go fuck them in ur humerrrrrrrrrrrr
abh3092 2 years ago
i have a good ole AMERICAN Chevrolet Cheyenne gas guzzlin V8 4x4 with a 5 on the floor and posi in the rear. and it seems you were a little quick to get some sort of a meaning out of my cuss rant...seems you are the one who fucks his parents? getting that checked with a doctor? and i love the fact that you always assume all Americans drive hummers...oh dear, the miseducted
BlackLabel7345 2 years ago
Americans drive bankrupt vehicles lol
flip2mac 2 years ago 2
tata's are not fly by night company
they are a 60 billion $ company
they spend a lot in R&D and
nano is a result of 6 years of dedicated hard work and research
abh3092 2 years ago
Oh, my goodness! No airbag!!! Either the car crashes into wall at speed of 5 m/hr, or it does not equiped with airbag at all!!
flyinghero123 2 years ago
airbag is not compulsory in india
abh3092 2 years ago
"airbag is not compulsory" ???????????
Unbelievable!!!!!!!!!!!
Then, driving this "nano" car is equivalent to suicide........
I am completely speechless.....
flyinghero123 2 years ago
in indian road you cannot even drive at the speed of 80kmph, so whats the use of airbag???
abh3092 2 years ago
:) dude, if you do not have an airbag and seat belt on and you crash into a static object capable of putting you to a halt... at less than 15 KMPH, your legs' bone fragments will be embroidered in the dashboard and I am talking about tough cars. In the same scenario with a Nano, your bone fragments will be reduced to dust and fly with the wind before an ambulance arrives. This car is equivalent to sitting on an unstoppable four wheel frame going on to hit a brick wall.
aajizana 2 years ago
it's 105 kmph
abh3092 2 years ago
more like 0.5km/h
nutzw1 2 years ago
Are you kidding me? 105 kmph without airbag coming out? As I said, either the car crashes into wall at speed of 5 m/hr, or it does not equiped with airbag at all!!
You are so funny!
flyinghero123 2 years ago
You indians are crazy! Even if I would get the car for free, I dare not drive it. A car without airbag...... wowowowo.....
flyinghero123 2 years ago
u r an idiot...it's with airbags...nano europa comes with airbags...what u smoking?
movieguy7589 2 years ago
Wtf? This was a crash test with 10kmph maybe!
dimitardanailov 2 years ago