Added: 2 years ago
From: LiberalViewer
Views: 23,801
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,128)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • TIME TO TAX BILLIONARES

  • mitch you really hurt yourself w/ this deal you came up with lately. sir your out of touch and need to retirer. then maybe a conservative can help take your spot. your a rhino,we don't need another half a liberal big spender that we betray a conservative vote and support obama and liberal votes seretly. it's a shame you turned out this way

  • If he's a centrist then why in holy hell does the American Communist Party endorse him?

  • @MyTotalRemedy Because he is in the center (more like center right) and the other party is at the extrem right. They know communist party will never win in the U.S. they choose to endorse the less right of the 2 main party. Simple.

  • @MrG0TH1ER

    That's not how ideologues work. An extreme left party would rather stick with what they have than endorse someone who was center right. They consider the right to be evil, period.

  • Don't meet Obama anywhere.

    We are electing officials to get rid of the Obama damage.

  • No, there is no reason...other than we have a president who is focused, educated, precise, thoughtful, and genuine. We haven't seen that for 8 years, and it feels kinda funny. But the party of NO will have to get used to it, won't they?

  • An Obama quote: "I will bankrupt the coal industry."

  • the GOP's version of metting them in the middle is "do it our way".

  • MIDDEL GET YOU NO WHERE!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • All this arguing about the issues is moot. The man lies about most anything!

  • 1- Obama

    2-Fox News couldn't take the bitch slap Obama gave to the republicans

  • Obama has never been in the middle.

  • Barak Obamas Health Care Reform.... Can it hurt America's residents. .? American view points are important! Check out my utube profile and learn how.

  • What are you talking about? Mitch and Barry both voted in favor for the "bank bailout". Incompetence crosses the isle.

  • A pure conservative view is to keep goverment out of it. Federal goverment has no buisness at all involved.

  • @calimar28

    I believe you are talking about Libertarianism, not Conservatism. Libertarians want the Government out of everything, including their sex life.

    Aren't the Conservatives the ones concerned about gay marriage, abortion, prayer in schools etc?

  • No, those are "religious republicans", not nessacarily "conservatives". The word "conservative" was hijacked by the religious right decades ago, and the neocons as well. This is how the neocons get the religious right to vote them in even though they are not conservative at all...by talking religion and "claiming" they are conservative(Hackabee for example).

    Conservative and Libertarian are mostly the same thing.

  • @MrSuntour THANK YOU!!!!! IT IS SO NICE TO SEE SOMEONE WHO ACTUALLY KNOWS WHAT THE HELL THESE POLITICAL IDEAS ARE!

    I`m sorry for the caps, they just seemed right. ^^

  • @MrSuntour ur referring to social conservatives...True conservatives want a limited government...it wouldn't fit into the true conservatives nature to want the government ot interfere in social issues...abortion, gay marriage, war on drugs, etc. I think, and this is just my opinion, alotta people confuse neo cons with real cons and liberatarians with traditional cons. I might be off though...

  • oh god... fox news didn't air every minute of his BO's adress. oh wait... that's right. no one did...

  • @tommyc28 lol...and even if they did...who could sit through the whole thing...wow...

  • I'd object to the notion of the current bill being 'centrist'. The 'center' probably would not support a great deal of the bill's content. There are some things that could be passed today, but there is much that cannot.

    On that angle, this particular video is a bit of a miss.

    However, if one ignores most of the conservative views and focuses only on the 'big tent' Republicans, then you can kind of make the argument work.

  • please list all the things u hate about the bill in detail.. or at least name me 1 uber super left idea in the bill?

  • I'm not saying I 'hate' it.

    The first, biggest, 'super-left' idea is the notion of simultaneously mandating and subsidizing health insurance.

    Neither of those notions are conservative in the slightest. One alone would be bad. Both together is antithetical.

    A conservative approach to the issue would be along the lines of more purchasing options, lower prices, and reasonable regulation.

    E.g. Pre-ex: Conservative approach would be to require health plans to offer coverage at a regulated price

  • @mcbobbo

    "Conservative approach would be to require health plans to offer coverage at a regulated price"

    Not at all. There is nothing conservative about wage and price controls. They are just as progressive as mandating the purchase of a product. the real conservative way would be to allow for open competition and to allow companies and individuals to taylor policies for themselves through choices and deductibles. Instead of government mandates on what general policies cover.

  • We agree. I'm trying to be 'centrist', though, as desired in the video.

    I believe conservatives would be less adverse to 'anti-gouging' legislation, for example.

    And to be fair, I was running out of space. :)

  • @mcbobbo

    Well then you should have said "a centrists approach"

    But the real issue here is what is truly best for the most people. You will never please everybody.

  • Well, there's limited space. That and we're commenting on the video above, which sets the topic. Right?

  • @mcbobbo

    Why would a 20 years old male have to buy a generic policy that covers pap smears and mamograms? When he could buy a policy that covers emergencies and accidents, and maybe some annual checkups. Older people can set individual deductibles on perscription drugs to a level that lowers premimums. And let all health insurance companies compete for business instead of giving a few of them guaranteed income through mandates.

  • We agree. See above. I'm trying to participate from a conservative point of view.

    The purest conservative position would be that this entire issue is outside the matter of government, particularly at the Federal level.

    That being said, IF we were to agree on a bill, I'm speculating as to what it might contain.

    At any rate, I didn't ever advocate against selecting coverage to meet your needs.

  • Obama should had started out in the first place getting input not a year later he can't even get his own party to sign on because the American people the man is a good talker but not a good doer

  • Fuck meeting Obama in the middle why should we? The people are behind the GOP on this one, and Obama knows it. Otherwise he wouldnt have to have meetings with the GOP. So no, no 2000 page healthcare bill. And if you dont like it, too bad.

  • Actually if you now any history the New Deal and Keynesian economics is what got us out of the depresion, a part of history that you conservatives are in denial about. And also if it wasn't for the stimulus package the US would be in another great depression and not getting out of the greatest recession, since the great depression, which was caused by Bush's faulty deregulation policies.

  • How did the New Deal get us out of the deppression? It went on for 12 more years until WWII pulled us out! In 1938 one of FDR's main advisers ADMITTED that it "wasnt working". So what do you mean the new deal worked?

    You liberals really need to learn some history. The mal investment on wall street in 1929 WAS CAUSED BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE AND ITS CHEAP RATES. Why is it that liberals have no concept of economics?

  • lol that is funny "I should learn something about economics", my major is economics and my cumulative average is a 3.5. also the depression in 1929 was worse than the recession in 1921 and Hoover not doing anything about the Great Depression made it worse. WW2 had something to do with us getting out of the depression as well as the New Deal, and you are forgetting that military spending is a part of gov spending which must be a spender of last resort if private consumption falls.

  • Funny how you are an economics major and still dont know jack, you have to get schooled by a buisness owner like me. The 1921 recession FAR WORSE than the 29 one, espicially in home price drops..look it up. Homes dropped 50%!!!!!!

    And as far as 29 goes, Your statment that Hoover did nothing boggles me. He started a spending spree which worsened it, and then FDR came and kept it going for over a decade. You say you get a 3.5? Which teacher do you date? Or are you a negro and get favors?

  • forget my last statement. the second u said negro i realized that your issues are not based in facts. u have some social and upbringing issues to get over. get luck with that...

  • Most of the urging to banks to loan money to the poor, came from Dems like Barney Frank. Sure at first the GOP didnt object, but as it came appearant what was happening, the GOP including Bush was warning (as early as 2003) that home loans to the poor could be a disaster. it was Frank and Dodd and the bleeding hearts who supported liar loans, and even Acorn go in and intimidated bankers who wouldnt play along.

    And what about "negro"? Are blacks not negros? I didnt say the N word.

  • How wrong. In 1921 we had a far worse recession than 1929, yet President Harding did...NOTHING. He did not bail out anyone, he said "your on your own". By 1922 it was over and then the twenties were proserpus. Please learn a little something about how econimics work. When people make bad decisions the gov should not bail them out.

  • You should look up the multiplier effect, that is why the New Deal worked. Low interest rates were not the reason we got into the Great Depression the reason we got into the depression was that their were very few rules about how the stock market and banks should be regulated which led to a lot of fraud, over speculation on commodities, insider trading etc.

  • The "rules' were taken advantage of because the Federal Reserve was lowering interest rates and creating credit out of thin air...so bankers and men on Wall st took chances to make fast money. Do you know anything about economics?

    Why do you think in 2006 Fund managers were creating and selling CDO's with AAA ratings, all created by liar loans? The banks and Fanie/Freddie were told BY THE GOVERMENT to give loans to those with bad credit. Then the wall st gang took that and ran with it, see?

  • but that wasn't necesarily the worst thing the worst thing was that there was no regulation on what a bank could do, for example banker's started to use derivatives to get around the small amount of regulation they did have. also the gov was only forcing the corps a little bit to lend to people with bad credit so that they could be homeowners. The real reason for the recession was because people like Alan Greenspan truly beleived that the housing buble would never burst and that the economy

  • uh not really, banks where into sub prime loans before f&f got into the game. f&f got into the game because they where the only big bank left not in the game and their profits where effected by not being in the game. Several Macroeconomist have already stated that most of the risky loans where not made by F&F.countrywide, citybank, and i forgot the other bank had the most and where in that game the longest. F7F came late to the party

  • built on cheap credit since the 80's would continue to boom. He incouraged people to take out risky mortgages on their houses, and encouraged banks to trade these risky assets. And he was the one who kept interest rates low, as a true objectivist he believed that greed and self interest would save the economy. Well he was wrong, what was a product of reganonomics failed.

  • Supported and demanded by Democrats

  • No actually that was

    Bush's plan because he thought it was important that everyone be home owners. Also interest rates have been low since Ronald Reagan turned our current account surplus into a financial account surrplus, yes when you have low interest rates their is an incentive to borrow more instead of lending/saving,

  • LiberalViewer, you're wasting your time, those who agree with your ideology already know that Fox News lies about being fair and balanced, and doesn't show the left's point of view,

    and those who disagree with your ideology will convince themselves that your lying and making stuff up, however you do a good job and staying unpartisan despite your title lol. keep up the good work i guess, i just wanted to comment that most of this is "preaching to the choir"

  • @Jarut195 I don't think that's fair to say...I disagree with alot of what the liberal viewer says...and I watch and read from wayyyy more source then FOX...I read liberal sources, progressive sources, and conservative sources. I know alot of conservatives who do the same...I pretty much just disregard the political opinion of anyone who just looks at things from one political perspective. You should do the same. You wouldn's waste your time responding to the type of people who just watch fox.

  • also breaking monopolies is part of regulation.

  • KKKONSERVATIVES

  • Obama is a total idiot.

  • Clearly Obama has reached across the aisles to the right and got his hands slapped on several occasions.

  • When ENRON filed for bankruptcy after the massive fraud and bogus accounting was sorted out, the REAL assets were about $12 billion. SO in the fifteen years that Lay ran the company, he never added any value to the employees or shareholders at ALL.All of the trading operations, water company, foreign power plants that NEVER generated any electricty, the Trans-Afghan pipeline now being built by UNOCAL,ALL of the LAY efforts amounted to ZERO. WHY does he deserve to be paid for worthless activity?

  • Since ENRON was a very organized criminal enterprise then can you explain WHY they were not prosecuted under the organized crime RICO statutes? Since Lay was prosecuted by his old friend and business operative, Alberto Gonzales, then can you explain WHY the charges against him were set aside after his alleged death? His wife WALKED with about $150 MILLION of stolen money.

    When the company later known as ENRON bought Lay's company in '85 it was worth about $12 billion.

  • There were over three and a half MILLION hits about ENRON and CA energy crisis. A short review of a few yielded this TYPICAL result.

    "Enron cynically and knowingly created the phony California electricity crisis of 2000 and 2001.

    There was never a shortage of power in California . Using tape recordings of Enron traders on the phone with California power plants, the film chillingly overhears them asking plant managers to "get a little creative" in shutting down plants for "repairs." "

  • Lets try using simple math. Say you produce hammers.The government tells you that you can't sell that hammer for more than $3. As long as the cost to make it is less than $3, everything is OK. But now the cost of the wood and medal goes to $4. But the state government tells you that you still MUST sell that hammer for $3.

    Now heres the big question;

    If it cost you $4 to produce a hammer that sells for $3 and you still have to pay employees to make them, how many hammers will you produce?

  • Let's use a REAL scenario. Energy sells for a certain price in CA. ENRON gets CA to DEregulate the price and then artifically restricts delivery using fraud. The PEOPLE cannot have time to find alternatives so they pay an artificially high price for the energy of, in some cases, die. Should Enron have been prosecuted for murder?

    SO, Bush did prosecute a FEW of the criminals at ENRON but missed hundreds including some of his later supporters like Rich Kinder, Mick Seidl. WHY?

  • The real scenerio is how I laid it out.

    1. California had strict regulations and capped energy prices. People didn't conserve because prices were artificially low.

    2. The California lifted caps on the cost side to let energy suppliers charge producers markets rates.

    3. California kept the caps on what energy producers could charge.

    4. producers disided not to produce because they would lose money.

    Bottom line, Enron couldn't do this without the help of state government.

  • Besides, you again have this wrong.

    Energy did sell for a certain price. But Enron didn't get California to deregulate the price of energy. They got CA to left the restrictions on the supply. However, CA in it's infinately liberal/progressive wisdom, didn't want people to pay higher end prices for energy so they kept price caps on what producers could charge. That created the problems in the market that distroyed the system. We seem to be going round and round. Gotta go.

  • Kinder was BUSH's NUMBER ONE supporter in 2004 as Lay was in 2000. The BUSH AG in charge of the ENRON prosecutions was Alberto Gonzales, who had worked for Vinson & Elkins law firm in Houston on...the ENRON ACCOUNT. ENRON was prosecuted by an ENRON lawyer.

    BUSH should have been impeached early for collusion, conspiracy and treason.

  • From "The Nation". One of many articles on what REALLY happened at ENRON which is opposite of what you claim.

    "The disaster of California's blackouts and soaring electric bills was a prima facie case of monopoly price-gouging--artificial scarcity induced by utilities simultaneously shutting down electricity generation for "repairs"--that cries out for criminal investigation.The firm profited spectacularly. While California groaned, Enron's share price more than doubled. "

  • THE NATION!!!!!!!!!

    LOLOLOLOLOL

    One of the most liberal magazines in the country. What story angle do you really think they are going to promote.

    BAD BIG BUSINESS=BAD CAPITALISM AND MONOPOLY

    or

    Due to the stupidity of liberal/progressives policies in The most liberal/progressive state, more proof of how government regulation distroy a free market and puts real working families in the unemployment line?

    I guess they went with big bad business.

  • And besides, didn't I just tell you that because of the lopsided government regulations, utilities didn't want to produce energy? The more energy they produced the more money they would lose because of the price caps. Of course they would say their grids need repairs. Anything to try and stay afloat. How one sidedly ignorant canyou be?

  • This stunt pulled by fox makes me more mad than the usual ones.

    Don't forget to rate.

  • @ LiberalViewer

    Why did you delete my comment on your channel about Judson Phillips NOT being the founder of the Tea Party, as your video, "Tea Party Founder Misquotes Reagan," states? A simple Google search easily shows that.

    No true Tea Party member would invite Sarah Palin to speak anywhere.

    I thought you were all about "Fair and Balanced"? Your channel is to protest editing of "the opposing side," yet you edit the truth, while posting lies.

    You're just another NWO flunky.

  • Notice how McConnell reframes the discussion by referring to cap and trade as the "National Energy Tax". Take notes boys and girls, because twisting vocabulary is a very effective psychological brainwashing technique. Republican think-tanks craft of choice.

  • McConnell did this because he was COACHED on how to do it by one of the disciples of Karl Rove. It was McConnell along with Phil Gramm who screwed America by shutting down the efforts of Brooksley Born to expose the extreme danger to the US economy of DERIVITVES and their risky, speculative gambles which were in the HUNDREDS OF TRILLIONS. That's RIGHT kiddies. T-T-T-T-TRILLIONS. I was in a meeting with the CEO of a large bank who said his exposure was $70 TRILLION.

  • Obama is brilliant, no doubt about that given his grades at Harvard. Perhaps he could have skipped one of those law classes and taken a leadership course? When Bush was in charge, he demanded (you name it), and the Democrats basically gave it to him, anything to avoid being called America haters. If you objected, you were invited to go to France. Obama is now in charge. He has caved on the public option and other parts of HCR, and is still apparently a bloodthirsty tyrant.

  • There are many who are disappointed that Obama has not:

    Arrested much of the BUSH administration for treason.

    Given a full and complete investigation of the 9-11 attacks and NOT the White Wash under BUSH.

    Shut down the insolvent banks and arrested the criminal bankers.

    Ended the war in Iraq and Afghanistan.

    Disbanded the CIA.

    Ended the power of the Federal Reserve.

    Ended unConstitutional Income Tax.

    But if he had done even one of those patriotic actions he would be with JFK right now.

  • You keep repeating the same crap. Some of your bullet points not only don't make sense, they are exactly opposite of what Obama is doing. Why would you be disappointed when you knew exactly what he was going to do?

    End the power of the Federal Reserve? He's got a dozen former reserve, Goldman Saks and JP Morgan Execs on his team. OF course he's not going to end the Fed.

    Shut down the Banks?

    See above!

    End the income tax?

    He's using it to punish certain groups. That'a unconstitutional.

  • End the war in Iraq and Afganistan?

    Not only is he expanding that, but he is now expanding into Pakistan, Yeman, and soon Iran.

    You also missed one.

    Disband The Patriot Act and stop spying on American Citizens. Ooooppps!

    Not only is Obama not disbanding that, he is working right now with Harry Reid to renew it with much bigger unconstitutional provisions. Keep your head up Obamas ass. Otherwise, you'll find out that he is just continuing the policies of the ones who really run Washington.

  • I agree that Obama has not done nearly enough to reverse the great evil that BUSH did. You will need to PROVE you allegations that Obama is in any way worse than BUSH. I strongly disagree on that one. I suspect that like so much else, he is trying to reach out to the Republicans with the things that you CLAIM. THAT is definitiely a mistake. I suspect that Obama is trying not to get assassinated like they did to JFK when he ordered Robert McNamara to prepare to REMOVE OUR TROOPS from Vietnam.

  • "I agree that Obama has not done nearly enough to reverse the great evil that BUSH did"

    ARE YOU KIDDING ME? Reverse? Can't you read?

    HE'S EXPANDING THE WARS.

    HE'S EXPANDING THE PATRIOT ACT. HE'S GIVEN THE FED MORE POWER AND CONTROL.

    You must really love that Kool-Aid.

    And as for JFK, he wasn't shot because he wanted the troops out of Vietnam. He was shot for signing Executive Order #11110 which acted to abolish The Federal Reserve System. Within 6 month's he was dead.

  • As of right now I really won't criticize Obama for the wars. He even gave timeline of the withdraw, which to me is better than staying there forever. If he breaks that promise, it's a political suicide for him and will never again get any more support even from liberals. But the Patriot act has to go, Obama made himself out to be such a anti Bush but seems like much of what he does reflect what Bush did.

  • Robert McNamara in his film "the Fog of War" has repudiated you. McNamara was told to plan to remove our troops from Vietnam after the '64 election. LBJ whose main support came from Brown and Root now called Halliburton a war mongering oil field service company, cancelled those orders. JFK also ordered the disbanding of the CIA, the assassination specialists. After the assassination, Jackie said "THEY murdered my husband". Madeleine Brown testified of a secret LBJ meeting the day before.

  • And you STILL have failed to provide ANY evidence at all to support your suspicions about Obama. KOOL AID, INDEED.

  • Suppose the next President is a Republican, you think the Democrats become the party of NO?

  • I fuken hope so.

  • They didn't during BUSH when they SHOULD have voted AGAINST the Iraq war, AGAINST the Patriot Act and AGAINST no bid contracts for Halliburton and AGAINST the BUSH tax hand outs for the rich and AGAINST the BUSH DEREGULATION of large corporations and banks.

  • Bottom line to ALL OF YOU in here, the reason nothing positive may not get done from this administration and why many of you in here don't like the president is because he is the wrong party, the wrong age and the wrong race. It's likely his wife studying African-American history at Harvard hurts him ever more.

  • History, ALL history, if done honestly is beneficial. Those that oppose Obama for the reasons you say are not honest with themselves or America. History and the Lord will judge them harshly.

  • hey, liberal viewer, why are there so many wackjobs in this chat? lol

  • I might have felt better about the supposed effort on bipartisanship if it wasn't only days after the Scott Brown election. It's too obvious they were trapped in the need to reach out. It doesn't ring sincere at all sorry.

  • uprising.

  • federal controlled healht care and cap and trade r SATANIC......

  • Back door reparations and racist...

  • LiberalViewer, you are just as bad as the GoP. Plus your voice is really annoying. P.S.  I'm a democrat.

  • @momobney The voice thing was just mean. I take it back. My point remains though that I enjoy drama as much as the next guy but this three ringed circus that the democrat/republican war has turned into is getting ridiculous.

  • It is only rediculous because you want your way... the American people disagree with your ploy to create a marxist socialist State called "amer-i-K-a"

  • I'll bet you sing Deutchland Uber Alles when you worship your picture of Hitler and Sarah? WHY do you support the NEOCON traitors? The NEOCON gure was Leo Strauss who came to America on a Rockefeller grant arranged by Carl Schmitt who was the German lawyer for Fritz Thyssen and his partner Prescott BUSH AND...ADOLF HITLER. Most of the BUSH WH were NEOCONS.

    The trouble with history for fascists is that it comes up to bite them in the ass. NOW is the time to repent.

  • George Bush didn't support spiking the unborn in the head...

    George Bush isn't the Messiah.

    George Bush didn't have children singing songs of worship to him.

    George Bush didn't win the Nobel after only serving 11 days in office.

    George Bush didn't go on a year long; "I am sorry tour."

    George Bush didn't select someone for Secretary of State which discussed his not being qualified.

    George Bush didn't move his children's grandmother into the White House.

    He is an Uncle Tom.

  • BUSH DID pay for an abortion for his ex-girlfriend.

    Bush DOES claim to be the Messiah for fascists, the new Fuhrer.

    Obama DID win the Nobel prize, NOT for what he did as president but for saving America from a fascist regime and the PROMISE of what might be done.

    Bush SHOULD spend the rest of his life on a "sorry" tour.

    MORE than half of America thought BUSH was unqualified and he IS.

    What have YOU got against grandmothers?

  • Prove it...

    A Nobel prizwe for promises? How fugked up is that? He hasn't kept any promises to the American people.

    Bush won his elections... TWICE.

    Obama's wife's grandma is in charge of the White House... the stories will leak out. BTW... that is OUR white house... not his.

  • There is very good reason to believe that BUSH did not "WIN" either election. My sister lived in Dade country and complained of the BUSH thugs lined up at her polling place, checking IDs, doing background checks and blocking the entrance. THAT is the same tactics that dictators use, that the IRANIANS use, that HITLER used.

    NOW might be a good time for you to look in the mirror as ask yourself WHO you support. The enemies of the Constitution or a duly elected president?

  • The nobel prize is for the person who put in the most effort to form peace the person doesn't necessarily have to accomplish it. they gave it to him because instead of starting conflict he is trying to open up dialogue.

  • Obama didn't rescue you from George Bush... He completed his term of office and retired. You thought he would stay in office? Never leave? If you believe Obama gets to pull it off (staying in office indefinitely) after we get rid of him in 2012 (if not sooner by Impeachment for TREASON) then we will kick off a Revolution to end his kingship.

  • Obama believes in and supports the Constitution and will abide by it. NO OTHER president EVER attacked and diminished the Constitution more than BUSH. He CHANGED the Congressional wording in the middle of the night and substituted the Cheney's version and then rush through the vote before anyone could read it. Talk about TREASON! BUSH DID secretly those things that the British crown did that CAUSED the Declaration of Independence and Constitution to be written. George Washington warned us.

  • @exenrontexas Lets not forget that every federally elected official take an oath to protect and defend The Constitution. But what about the appointees that a president hires for cabinet positions? Do you think a White House Chief of Staff should defend The Constitution? If yes, then why would Rahm Emmanuel say on camera that The First Amendment was over rated?

  • ROFLAMO. So you are saying that anyone who takes that oath should give up their rights of free speech under the Constitution? I took that oath to protect and defend the Constitution when I went to Vietnam but I rejoiced when Daniel Ellsberg released the Pentagon Papers which criticized the US involvement in Vietnam and exposed great EVIL done in our name. Nixon vigorously prosecuted Ellsberg and tried desperately to shut him up. Nixon has gone down in history as one of the worst...until BUSH.

  • @exenrontexas "Give up their rights to free speech?" Not at all. But what I find really funny is when someone who is using their "Right to free speech" to proclaim that free speech is over rated while working for someone that vowed to protect free speech. Now that's something to really laugh your ass off about.

  • I believe that very many presidents have had to suffer under that including Jefferson who was a rabid defender of free speech. So if you find humor in Obama's situation, then so be it. I believe tolerance and even discussion of diverse views makes a presidency and even a nation stronger. Isn't that what we are doing now? Compare this to the oppressive regimes of BUSH, Reagan and Nixon who would not suffer internal criticism.

  • I might find it funny but alarming at the same time. You keep touting Democrats and deriding Republicans but fail to see that both sides push increasingly oppressive regimes. A takeover of healthcare, cap and trade, net neutrality, paid czars and never repealing anything a predesessor does just shows that government grows no matter who is in charge. You complain about the "Evil" Patriot Act but don't see that Obama and Reid are trying to secrectly push it's renewal with more draconian policies.

  • Since I am somewhat disappointed by Obama for not having wholesale arrests and prosecutions of the BUSH admin and their fellow travelers, I feel somewhat uncomfortable defending him. It may be that he is trying NOT to get assassinated like they did to JFK? I am not sure. I strongly disagree with your assertions about the take over of the MONOPOLISTIC private healthcare since my sister died three years ago when the lawyers for her CA HMO denied her life extending treatments for cancer.

  • It may be that I criticize that which I have personally experience. I worked at ENRON when Karl Rove and Karen Hughes had offices there and I have met most of the BUSHIES including BUSH 41. I was in many of their meetings as a support person and I heard what they have planned for America and it is not pretty. Most of the conspiracy theories are only mildly theoretical. The see the DEMS as no real threat since they are disorganized, poorly funded and bicker among themselves. NOT SO the GOP.

  • Since the GOP controlled SCOTUS has now approve UNLIMITED corporate campaign contributions from both domestic and foreign goverrnments then I think it is only fair to bring back the FAIRNESS DOCTRINE and even beef it up a little. That will, of course, cause the death of Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, Hannirty, O'Reilly and Beck since the one thing they cannot endure is fairness and the opposing truth revealed to their listeners.

  • Obama has and continues to cling to this belief that the gongressional Republicans will work in a bipartisan manner to help solve the problems of our country........but they won't! They have and continue to refuse cooporation with this President on the basis of race and ideology. One just needs to look at the signs the TeaBaggers carry. Sick and twisted messages of hate.

  • No!

    They refuse to work with him because he is a Marxist and Unqualified to be President of the United States.

    MSNbc and the other LIBtard news networks SELECTED him. The American people bought into the lies even though we stated to them that all of those promises were unworkable.

    The TRUTH has been revealed and now you must watch a Revolution happen in the ballot booth, and if that doesn't work a real Revolution that shuts down this nation and starves you into compliance.

  • your an idiot dude on what basis is he a marxist his healthcare plan? if you actually did any reading you would now that he gave up all the left wing stuff like the public option, and now basically all it is is a centrist plan to give subsidies to insurers so that they can insure everyone. Is that really a bad thing?

  • I don't know what happened to the United States being a free country.

  • This country hasn't really been free for at least the last century, and possibly since its inception. The freedom we all think we have is nothing more than an illusion, fostered by people with large fortunes and the corporations they created.

  • Why do all the libs cry over FOX NEWS ? You don't see conservatives bitching all the time over MSNBC, NBC, CBS, ABC and CNN. You libs have 5 channels of pure liberal diarrhea but always cry about FOX. Get over it.

  • Exactly... 5 to 1... and their ratings suck.

    Maybe they will go bankrupt?

  • Name calling... the forte of a LIBtard.

    Better start saving up your food.

  • As far as old Mitch MCConnel goes....follow the money. For that matter, follow the money with them all period.

  • democrats our a bunch of traitors period

  • It's really simple. GOP doesn't want to work w/Obama because he's been painted as such a radical, ultra-liberal, degenerate fool that to stop any of his legislation and ideas makes the GOP look like heroes.

    Obama made the big mistake of believing Americans are smarter than they are. They really just buy into all the bullshit the media pipes into their brains. Fox News fear patrol wins again!!

  • "Obama made the big mistake of believing Americans are smarter than they are."

    REALLY?

    That just shows how stupid you and others that think like you are. I made a mistake and voted for Obama because I thought he was running as a centrist. To straddle the fence between two opposing ideologies. He gave great speeches and promised great things. If he'd followed through with his campaign promises, I believe he would have gove down as one of the greatest presidents of all time. HE LIED. HE"S DONE

  • No, you made the mistake of thinking politicians are going to solve your and your country's problems. The trouble the US is in right now isn't because Obama isn't the Superman, it has come about from years of cultural insensitivity, fiscal irresponsibility, usurped power, laws rewritten in shadow, and a general governmental structure which is anything but "rule by the people." Jeez

  • Actually you made the mistake of thinking that politician would ever go centrist. Republicans don't want to work with Obama, all they want to do is make sure he looks like a failure so they can win the house, senate, and presidency.

  • @BlanknWhite Let's hope they succeed

  • Until half of the Congress Democrats are in jail there is no reason to negotiate with the remaining Democrats.

  • They all seriously need to face charges for TREASON... and if they are found guilty they should be HANGED... "LIVE" ... on C-Span.

  • The GOP showed they cant afford a public dialog. 1st Obama at the GOP house meeting. He exposed them as the zero punks they are. 2nd Jon stewart revealing the fox news guru of sham orielly as another ignorant punk. If they have the balls to show up at the healthcare dialog America will turn on them overnight.

  • This example is why Murtha's seat will be ours next.

  • How wrong you are !

  • You have no idea how bad of a land slide vote PA is going to put down against the Democrats do you?

    You'll see it go down... this election is going to show you what is in store for November 2010.

  • way to go GOP, block everything these communist bastards want to pass!!

  • This video sums it up. Republicans have hardline principles instead of being pragmatic. As such, they don't compromise. They view compromise as poison. We liberals will continue to be screwed as long as 41 republicans from rural states can lock down the congress.

  • How about we have our civil war?

    Wouldn't that be more prefered anyways as you move towards creation of your Socrates Class which enslaves the rural areas of America as a perpetual working class? Thank God we have guns and bullets.

  • the Dems are no better..

  • Why would FOX cover stupid political speech that are all lies. The democrats never meet in the middle. Bi-partician only means that everyone has to agree with the democrats not the other way around. The time for games are over. Obama is a Maxist - and a 1 term president.

  • Key words: Youtube VID CLIP: Rachel Maddow- Taking names on GOP hypocrisy

  • Why do we have to listen to a Lesbian?

    No...

    She is a reflection of your Godless, spineless, and Guttless selves; she reflects what you wish imposed on us.

  • republicans are traitors and should be shot.

  • @62rome will just take cover and send a nuke its our way lol

  • You are the reason we should burn the highways leading to the inner cities... you are already raping, mugging, and thugging each other. Let's add starvation to the litany of problems affecting you.

  • @boostitup and you're the reason there's child molestation,inbreeding,beastia­lity,what was it you're daddy fuck you to much and now you do the same,just do the world a favor put a 12 gauge to you're forehead and pull the trigger.

  • Just letting you know... 5 gallons of gasoline mixed with several quarts of used motors oil... will shut down a highway leading to the city for hours!

    We will go to the ballot box first to end your progressive dream... and "if" that doesn't work you can expect the good citizens of America to rise up and confront you.

    We will mutter the words... "Getting hungry yet" As the highways leading to the inner cities are set ablaze and nothing gets in... and nothing gets out.

  • sure like you can make that happen, i bet you're one of those pussy republican terrorist, you don't know what good americans are, i be waiting to see if you got the balls to do start that shit, if not you're a pussy.

  • We were called terrorists by Janet Nepolitano or do you forget that? Those of us who do not support abortion, believe in the founding father's God, and refuse to let you take our guns from us as you create a worldwide government.

    We killed Global warming...

    We will kill Cap and Trade...

    We will take Murtha's seat...

    It is over for you Progressives... sit back and wait another 75 years ok?

  • Well said...and most importantly we killed that PORK loaded Health Care monstrosity !

  • well i'm still waiting for the fire's and all that bullshit you've been saying still haven't seen it on tv or heard any news on it but just as i thought you're a pussy.

  • You're delusional, you need help, seriously. What laws were passed that took your guns away? You call President Obama a thug, then say you're going to set streets on fire to stop traffic? You're pathetic, it's sad, but what's worse is you sound like a misled fox disciple. You probably listen to all of glenn beck's shows, don't do any research, & lie about military service. You're a weak minded schnook that wastes time, energy, & resources dividing for politics sake rather than helping.

  • No... I actually served over 20 1/2 years unlike the LIBtards on your side which fake it on the posting boards. Please call me back to Active Duty to face a military Court Martial for inciting "Insurrection." I will be happy to demand proof of Obama's Natural Born Status at such an event and because of the UCMJ covering him as Commander In Chief he will have to release every document requested or face a dismissal as I get promoted for reason of High Year of Tenure and receive more pension.

  • Provide your service number, please and we can get that ball rolling. You definitely deserve your day in court or perhaps in Gitmo for being a terrorist?

  • My Service Number is my SSN. You don't get to have access it... but the Secret Service surely has access to it, as does the NSA, FBI, and CIA.

    I have Free Speech and will continue to state that the Long Legged Mack Daddy is not qualified to be our President. You can Court Martial me!

    I am not running for President of the United States; so not required to release such documentation. You can have Obama face scrutiny on his using several SSN's in the course of his life though...

  • YOU claimed you want to rejoin the military. We will need your service number to do that. Post you phone number and I will forward it to a recruiter. IF you had an honorable discharge which I doubt, they will take you back and hopefully send you to Helman province so you can prove your patriotism because, and I am SURE this not the ONLY reason why, YOU need to PROVE you have a right to the citizenship that you enjoy. Your posts have caused that to be in question.

  • No... those who are "RETIRED" must be called up to Active duty by a demand from Congress.

    So... you must lobby to get Congress to do a recall of all available retired personnel. Surely you are so powerful that you can make this happen!

    Want to make it more likely? Call up the Selective Service Program first... so we can be used as trainers to scream and yell at you in preparation for Iran.

  • I am sure that there is a provision in the so-called "Patriot Act" that can make that happen. Most of America was SURPRISED that BUSH eviscerated the Constitution with that. OR we could put you in Gitmo for Treason since you are breaking your oath of allegiance by advocating the overthrow of the government and a betrayal of your loyalty to the Commander-in-Chief. So you see, you won't be training ANYONE from your small cell in solitary confinement.

  • Your Democrats dominated Congress passed another year extension on that Patriot Act... looks like more of the same again?

    Obama supports the Patriot Act.

  • Free Speech... and you don't get to move me to Gitmo. You must convict me right here on American soil with all of the rights afforded my by my "NATURAL BIRTH" which I can prove but your Failure in Chief cannot.

    Betrayal of loyalty? What aboutall of you PLUStards who were calling Bush all those names? You were guilty of treason for being unwilling to support a war after the President made the choice with the support of Congress. You are the guilty party.

  • you're full of shit, and seriously delusional about a lot of things.

  • Assertions... that is what you LIBtards do best... let's see you actually debate which things ok? I sense you can't debate; primarily because you know you will reflect a marxist Leninist Maoist view and be laughed at by the Dems who are now waking up to your ploys under Obama and Company.

  • So, it that YOU, Osama or did you learn that trick at your fascist meetings? Regardless, you are a terrorist and an enemy of the American people. Ike warned us of people like YOU.

  • Traitors to what? The soviet union? Idiot.

  • @pigshit the only idiots here are the people that believe in the republicans bullshit,don't forget the eight years of dumbass george bush,but if you did you're an idiot,besides what does the soviet union have to do the u.s. economy,you must be one of the backward country fucks.

  • Dont forget the first year of your Messiah ! He already quadrupeled the debt. He doubled what Bush did in 8 years. Who is the real idiot !

  • @dijhili You are the idiot. Bush gave the money away to the investors who invested in China. Obama spending is investment and keeping Americans in their haomes work and school. Take your corporatist bullshit somewhere else

  • Doing a real good job investing, hahaha...unemployment is still record levels with little to no jobs created.

    Keep blaming Bush....its all you got.

  • @dijhili Hes trying but with the GOP intent to drive American workers into the ground,and their policy of bankrupting America,so they could everything public. The GOP

  • The GOP is not driving American workers in the ground, I mean seriously.

    "so they could everything public" ?

    Bush was bad, Obama is worse. Congress needs to be revised. The GOP as well as MOST AMERICANS thing the government is spending too much and spending incorrectly. The GOP simply does not want to pass legislation with PORK. That Health monstrosity was riddled with payoffs and PORK. America is happy it did not pass as it was. They need a new one.

  • @dijhili The GOP are PORK

  • Look at the Health Care bill, it was riddled with Billions to pay off Democrats in Congress. It was all bribe money.

    New bill, no Pork. No government mandates, cross state line policies, and TORT reform !