Al Gore is a rightwing coward. He ordered the EPA to needlessly poison and murder millions of innocent animals in laboratories with the LD50 test and other horrors.
He and the Demopublican terrorist party illegally interfered with a true progressive's campaign, a true patriotic national hero: Ralph Nader. Gore was never serious about the environment and fighting global warming. PETA has done more since 1980 and deserved the Nobel Peace Prize.
Average Global Temperatures SPIKED +0.6C (+1.08 degrees F) since 1975.
Summer Arctic Sea Ice has dropped -50% since 1980.
Since 1950 atmospheric CO2 has spiked +30% over highest levels in 400,000+ years.
CO2 Ocean Acidification is up +30% since 1900!
Oops?
For more data & documented info. on Carbon Dioxide/CO2 Concentration, Global Surface Temperature, Arctic Sea Ice and Land Ice (Antarctica & Greenland) & Sea Levels
Al Gore sucks and he's a huge liar!!! His movie sucks and is brain washing propoganda movie was full of mistakes misrepresentations and flat out lies,in fact it's so bad an english judge ruled to make him correct 9 big whopping lies and another 6 smaller fibs before any english school child was aloud to watch it.Pay Blood and Gore (that;s his company) carbon credits and he'll fix the planet for us yey mr gore youre such swell guy vomit!!!!
....Gore's load of BS "Inconvenient" was obvious pop-enviro propoganda in Great Britains' opinion. They required a disclaimer to be inserted at the beginning before inflicting it on imressionable grade-schoolers over there.
Unfortunately, it became gospel to much of our population here, especially those who think @ a grade school level........
@Klaus2551010 Actully it is not an episode but rather an extra from the movie Bender's Big score in which Al Gore guest stars. btw I'm not trying to be a know it all if it comes across that way.
actually I think what happened with Al Gore and Bush was pretty weird.
I mean, Al won and at the last the minute they told him he didn't, WTF?
Anyway, i don't care bout the past. I care about Obama, wtf is his deal with all them mexicans and illegal immigrants in the borders; specially in Arizona, it's full of them.
No ofense to hard working mexicans who are legal and just send money to their famillies back in their country.
He's probably not gonna win the next elections if he keeps up like this
science minded people seem very closed to new ideas the process of thinking science actually is about never coming up with an idea of their own. They cannot leave a thread until they feel fully satisfied their logic won out. The same type of logic has helped scientists to produce horrible disease causing agents, all in the name of progress. Don't blame me they shout i only pressed the button that lit the ovens. We prosecuted Nazi scientists but most of them ended up in the USA
@ste6666666 wow not only are you a fucking liar, you didn't even have the balls to write your ignorant comment as a reply.
you have no understanding of basic scientific concepts and you LIED that you were an environmental scientist.
you have shown your ignorance time and time and time again. "theories are always wrong" is just another example of your stupidity. its funny how you're so anti-science when you typing this comment on a COMPUTER that scientists invented.
@ste6666666 logic means looking at the FACTS and making a decision based on the fucking evidence. you have never even looked at any of the evidence for global warming in your life. you just thought it was bullshit and said it was some big conspiracy but you DONT EVEN UNDERSTAND IT.
oh and if scientists are so evil then why did you PRETEND TO BE ONE??? because you thought you could bullshit your way through a debate by lying about your expertise.
'never coming up with an idea of their own' what the fuck are you talking about? scientists are collecting data all the fucking time and people use that in multiple ways. you're an utter fuckwit if you think that all science is evil because bad people have done things in the past. by that logic all white people are evil for the bad things their race have done in the past. you are a lying fool, who has no understanding of science. stop trying to argue about something you dont understand.
@ste6666666 'They cannot leave a thread until they feel fully satisfied' you're the cunt who is so desperate to have the last word you wont reply directly to me.
and no, it is not my logic that is making me reply. my logic is telling me that you're just another lying dickhead on the internet who does not understand any of the shit you're spewing out. its my illogical, irritated part of me that keeps on replying to you because you're an ignorant fucking liar
@ste6666666 I can't let you get away with that. You can go on about "science minded people" and invoke the Nazis, but you can't cover up the fact that you got pwned by AussiePolitics in a debate. I mean seriously. He absolutely wiped the floor with you.
The governments of the world are going to use up all the oil and gas in the ground until there is none left. The Green brigade have done nothing to slow this down in fact its pace is increasing. But then plenty of legislation about carbon dioxide being a poison, hang on a minute isn't that what we breathe out. What I'm the polluter of the world along with all the other animals even dolphins. Not by using all the plastic and other junk that we have no choice to use, but just by existing.
@ste6666666 carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas. the greenhouse effect is an empirical fact and is a GOOD THING. it prevents heat leaving the earth so we have a stable temperature. the problem is when you dig up and burn for hundreds of years carbon reserves trapped underground. this INCREASES the amount of energy being trapped and it is reflected back to earth.
@AussiePolitics Thanks for that but i do know the theory. i was drawing a distinction between the co2 produced by burning fossil fuels and the fact that animals breathe out co2. Governments are helping us to use more fossil fuels whilst talking about population control. Think about it what are they actually saying. We want to burn fossil fuels and the poor people of the earth are going to pay for it by not existing and the wealthy through carbon taxes.
i have a degree in environmental science and to a lot of people this has become a replacement for religion, which they defend even when thousands of scientists are coming out in agreement that this global warming is a hoax. but of course the green religious zealots are not listening. James lovelock, typical eugenicist elitist. He said that he wanted to go to the moon. ok for some isn't it. I wonder how much co2 that would spew out, and at the same time wanted to reduce well, us.
@ste6666666 quite frankly I am not interested in what the nutjobs on both sides are coming out and saying, I am interested in the facts.
and the facts we KNOW are that carbon, methane and water are elements that create the greenhouse effect. if you studied environmental science you would know this is an empirical fact. so tell me, what do you think will happen when we massively increase the amount of these elements in the atmosphere? are you really saying it will have no effect?
@AussiePolitics Well only vote for a party that will actually reduce the amount of fossil fuels used ie by leaving them in the ground. You will not be able to because they will use all these fuels. I do not know it as an empirical fact i know it to be a theory based upon very dodgy science and skewed graphical representation of the data. If global warming was true wouldn't governments stop using the very fuels that are causing it and not blame the people. They want to cause fear.
@ste6666666 please tell me how you could have possibly studied an environmental science degree without doing a course on climatology.
yes, we do know that the other gases in the atmosphere such as nitrogen and oxygen do not trap heat, only carbon, methane and water. we have been able to measure the outgoing radiation of the planet since the 1970s with satelites and this has also empirically proven that there is less energy leaving the planet than ever before.
@AussiePolitics Stop using your car. I have never driven a car in my life I'm a true environmentalist. Don't buy products that are over packaged I don't. Don't believe lying governments and there agencies, that you recognise are locked into a cycle of economic growth at all costs. Even at the cost of our Earth. Why do you trust their scientists that are bought off for grant money. Plants use Co2 We will have a period of increased growth what with all that heat an all.
@ste6666666 again you make it all about ME when I am talking about the FACTS.
and no, deforestation by humans is also contributing to global warming because there are fewer trees than ever before to absorb greenhouse gases. this would have been obvious to even a first year science student. the ocean is also absorbing more carbon and heat than ever before and do you know why? because when water and carbon mix you get carbonic acid
@ste6666666 you say the scientists were bought off with grant money - what companies make billions of dollars each year? the oil and gas companies, who would get badly hurt by a carbon tax or change to renewable energy. if every single climatologist in the world is part of some evil taxation plot then the fossil fuel companies could quite easily have paid other experts to examine their methology and prove "BULLSHIT"
@ste6666666 have I mentioned a tax or a reduction in carbon emissions? no, I am discussing the facts. please tell me at what time I have ever claimed that I knew a solution or wanted to do anything about it?
"If global warming was true wouldn't governments stop using the very fuels that are causing it". no, because doing so would involve raising the cost which would mean they would get voted out of office. furthermore its a long term gradual expensive problem.
Yes but they have used more fossil fuels in this time frame they don't sound very worried. if you don't advocate doing anything about your theories why bother stating them. But then in the future you will be paying these taxes whether you agree with them or not. During which time governments and other elitists will be producing more of the gases that you propose are causing the problem. You in the meanwhile might be prosecuted for not recycling your rubbish that they make us use.
@ste6666666 because I am interested in the facts of the matter or do they not concern you at all?
and no, they are not my theories, they are empirical facts verified my thousands of scientists and immense amounts of data. please tell me, if climate change was such a hoax why have the giant fossil fuel emitting companies not been able to disprove it? they have the money and all they'd have to do is go through all the scientists methologies, and if there was a rat they'd find it and trumpet it.
@AussiePolitics But now there are thousands of scientists with the same level of education coming out on the opposite side of this. Why are you not listening to them aswell. Your views are biased fueled by fear from governments that can do nothing to change. They have to blame someone surely not themselves, well they blame me and you and all those poor people in other countries for simply breathing.
@ste6666666 really? please show me your thousands of scientists who are expert climatologists who say climate change is a lie. show me your proof for this claim. oh and don't show me a list that says 'scientists' because maths for instance is a science degree and they would know as much about atmospheric surgery as a labourer knows about rocket scientist.
@ste6666666 oh and actually in case you haven't read what I have been writing, I am interested in the FACTS. I dont care what they prove, but at the moment the mountain of evidence is clearly on the side of anthropogenic global warming.
if you can please direct me to a peer reviewed scientific journal written by a credible climatologist then I would be happy to say that climate change is bullshit.
@AussiePolitics The companies have not been hampered in any way they have their government in place why would they. they don't need to argue anything. look at the gulf to get this muck out of the ocean floor they have sacrificed a whole ocean ecosystem. They do not care for the environment they care about money and control. Why do you trust them so much. cars can run very efficiently on alcohol Oh we can make that ourselves and it gives off few emmisions. It's why its against the law.
@ste6666666 i never said I trusted the oil and gas companies - what I do trust is their desire to make MONEY. the fact of people acting on climate change would hamper their ability to make money would you not agree? so it would be in their best interests if it was a lie to show that its some big greenie religion so they dont have to worry about getting taxed extra
@AussiePolitics They fund the climate change brigade along with all the other elitists like Bill gates, why are people listening to this fool. and that rothschild spoilt billionaire adventurer, al gore the list goes on and on . They are spewing out these lies and pollution whilst advocating population control as the solution. The final solution more like it.and funding bad science to get control and legislation. You need to get your head out of the science books.
@ste6666666 "You need to get your head out of the science books" why because I shouldn't be interested in the FACTS of the matter? I am looking at the text books, the peer reviewed journals AND the raw data itself of experts from all over the world. why? because I am a REAL environmental scientist. your knowledge of science is so flimsy I doubt you have ever opened a textbook in your life.
@ste6666666 when you come up with the PROOF that the oil and gas companies are run by some evil global group that is funding all the environmental research of the thousands of scientists in the world, actually bother replying. you obviously have no interest in facts, just your own delusions. I have hundreds of years, thousands of experts and all the empirical evidence on my side. you have nothing but bullshit conspiracy theories and NO EVIDENCE.
@ste6666666 show me your evidence that the oil companies are funding all the climate change research. show me your evidence that thousands of climate experts have been paid to lie. at the end of the day we have KNOWN for hundreds of years about the greenhouse effect. we KNOW that carbon is one of the gases that increases this effect. the evidence is all there but you are to ignorant to see it.
@ste6666666 first of all how is all the excess C02 supposed to be absorbed by plants when we have destroyed most of the forests on this planet? deforestation increases every day and you say that plants are just going to absorb MORE C02? you obviously have never studied a science degree or you would not exhibit such obvious ignorance.
@ste6666666 who doesn't sound very worried? most scientists are worried for the long term prospects of the human race.
during your studies did you ever hear of the tree progymnosperms during your studies? they exists millions of years ago and looked similar to todays pines.
the were probably the first large trees with a canopy of photosynthetic material and do you know why they believe they went extinct? because they grew in such numbers and created so much oxygen they changed the atmosphere
@AussiePolitics Thats another theory along with the dinosaurs extinction, all we have is theories. And theories are always incorrect, they are only true until the next theory comes around. far too many variables are concerned here. They are obviously part of the the natural process equivalent of pioneer plants on barren rock. But we are the ultimate climax species not pioneers. Even if global warming is not a hoax population control is not the answer it is simply disguised nazi beliefs.
@ste6666666 ok now I know for certain that you're a liar when you said that 'theories are always incorrect'. I dislike being lied too by an ignorant fool. first of all you do not understand what a theory even is. do you want an example of a scientific theory? TRY THE THEORY OF GRAVITY.
'we are the ultimate climax species not pioneers' who says? in the earth's history we have been here a minuscule amount of time.
@AussiePolitics They are still discussing the theory of gravity you know those physicists, Right aggressive little person I can't believe i have spent so much of my time on a little weasel like you that can't discuss things in a civil way. Now your not an environmentalist your an aggressive little troll now go away and grow up and learn some manners.
@ste6666666 you say I am a weasel? you're the lying dirty bastard who claimed to have studied environmental science. you have been so wrong about everything you have claimed that it astounds me just how someone as ignorant as you can even use a computer. you are an ignorant little lying weasel. I grow tired of "debating" with an imbecile with not the slightest scientific understanding of basic concepts. tell me when has the theory of gravity EVER been proven wrong???
@ste6666666 that's why I have gotten aggressive and angry. you misrepresented yourself as being a scientific expert but every single statement you have made has made a lie of your claim. I am pissed off because I thought I was getting into a debate with a real scientist over an important issue. instead you are just a fucking idiot who not only lied, but has shown your ignorance time and time again. you are a liar, and next time dont misrepresent who you are you lying little shit
@AussiePolitics Explain the middle ages warm period. Explain why the data presented doesn't go back for thousands of years. We do have that data in the ice cores you know. Because we live on a big ball whizzing through space at thousands of miles an hour around a ball of varying atomic reacting hydrogen. and your expecting it to stay the same temp, get a grip. Explain what you have done about the damage you cause. but your not interested in this your not a true environmentalist.
@ste6666666 middle ages warm period was NOT as warm as today to start off with. if you watched that bullshit show the global warming swindle where they claimed it was warmed than today, they left the past 40 years of data off that graph. who the fuck says the 'present' when the data was from 1970?
@ste6666666 it was still warm now? what are you talking about? the scientific evidence shows that carbon is a greenhouse gas. we know that is a FACT. scientists have been able to measure that LESS energy is escaping into space directly along the wavelengths that carbon traps heat. I can send you the peer reviewed articles if you want.
your 'plants love it' statement is breathless in its ignorance. we have fewer forests than in hundreds of years and you think plants will absorb MORE???
@ste6666666 "mars is heating up" now you're just repeating bullshit that only the ignorant peddle.
first of all temperatures on mars are primarily driven by dust and albedo and there is no empirical evidence to indicate that it is undergoing LONG TERM warming.
if this is a pathetic attempt to say our warming climate is due to the sun, then that is another lie - for the past 40 years the sun has been COOLING slightly. so wrong again. any more pathetic myths to throw at me?
@ste6666666 actually the data DOES go back thousands of years. thats exactly what the ice cores are for.
of course the climate changes over time, no one has ever said otherwise, however it is the SPEED of the warming that is unprecedented and is alarming scientists. the earth's climate changes over thousands of years, but in the past 100 years we've seen an unprecedented raise in temperature.
@ste6666666 I ANSWERED IT. you are nothing but a liar. you lied to me about being an environmental scientist. only someone completely ignorant of EVERY scientific principle would ever make such a stupid comment that theories are always wrong. not only do you not understand anything about science, you do not even understand the definition of a scientific theory. LIAR. did you lie because you thought you could then bullshit your way through this debate?
UN wrongly linked global warming to natural disasters
From The Sunday Times
January 24, 2010
THE United Nations climate science panel faces new controversy for wrongly linking global warming to an increase in the number and severity of natural disasters such as hurricanes and floods.
It based the claims on an unpublished report that had not been subjected to routine scientific scrutiny — and ignored warnings from scientific advisers that the evidence supporting the link too weak..
NCAR: Scientists can't measure all heat trapped on Earth
Half of the energy captured by greenhouse gases isn't accounted for
About half of the total amount of heat entering the atmosphere is unaccounted for, according a study in Science that suggests the oceans are absorbing energy that will haunt us sooner or later.
Heat isn't "trapped" in the Ocean or the Atmosphere it is "spent" powering the Walker Circulation that moves heat around the world via the Ocean Currents (Heat to kenetic energy as heated water from ocean floorand from tropics mixes with cold water from poles) and as the heat rises of the ocean and earth surface heated air and cold air mix powering wind,hurricanes,tornadoes and as humid heated air rises and cools it makes cloulds
This "Soted Heat" by GHGs is 18th centurey bullshit
Climate change is affecting bird behaviour at a staggering rate; some 20 billion have already changed their flight plans.The biggest single identifiable reason behind such a massive behavioural shift, involving 70 per cent of the world's migrating birds is surprise, surprise climate change.
Rising temperatures and inadequate rainfall are causing grain output to stagnate in India, threatening food security in the worlds second-most populous nation, according to a weather scientist.
Quit impersonating me all over youtube, Spitfiremacx AKA N ii ghtversionn Nigh tt versionn Knigh tt vision Nigtversionn Nightver ss ion, Nigh ttt versionn Nightversio m Nightverslon, Nightversio nnn, etc.. Stalker, impersonator, global warming DENIER. What an imbecile
MANKIND LEAVES MARK ON THE PLANET WITH THE END OF THE 12,000-YEAR HOLOCENE AGE
Geologists are about to consider whether humans themselves have started to influence the geological history of the world. They cite human-induced changes to the geology of the Earth and the global climate.
@Niightversionn Hey Spitfiremacx You're a lame 69 year old GLOBAL WARMING DENIER impersonating me all over youtube aka N ii ghtversionn Nightvers l ionn Nigh tt versionn Knigh tt vision Nigtversionn Nightver ss ion, Nigh ttt versionn Nightversio m Nightverslon, Nightversio nnn, etc.. Stalker, impersonator, global warming denier. What an imbecile
GREAT BARRIER REEF OIL SPILL HITS RENOWNED NATURE SANCTUARY
Oil from a huge Chinese ship which grounded in the Great Barrier Reef has hit a world-renowned nature sanctuary, officials said Wednesday, raising fears for seabirds and baby turtles now hatching there.
@Niightversionn Hey Spitfiremacx You're a lame 69 year old GLOBAL WARMING DENIER impersonating me all over youtube aka N ii ghtversionn Nigh tt versionn Knigh tt vision Nigtversionn Nightver ss ion, Nigh ttt versionn Nightversio m Nightverslon, Nightversio nnn, etc.. Stalker, impersonator, global warming denier. What an imbecile
A study published in 2008 reports that China (which was excluded from the Kyoto requirements) became the largest emitter of CO2 from fossil fuel combustion and cement production in 2006. (Gregg, J. S., R. J. Andres, and G. Marland, China: Emissions pattern of the world leader in CO2 emissions from fossil fuel consumption and cement production, Geophysical Research Letters 35, 2008
In just FIVE YEARS between 2004-2009 the thickness of arctic ice has DROPPED 42%.
This was discovered by NASA satellite measurements. Reported 7/7/09
Search:
New NASA Satellite Survey Reveals Dramatic Arctic Sea Ice Thinning
Global Warming is changing our world NOW. CO2 is 35% above levels for 650,000 years. In just 30 years CO2 will be over 450ppm, enough to acidify oceans to the point of stopping the growth of many planktons and corals. They are at the base of the oceans' food chain.
9 of last 10 years were the HOTTEST on record. 2009 = 2nd HOTTEST on record Solar irradiance is at 35 year low Search: Data @ NASA GISS: Surface Temperature Analysis: Graphs & NASA GISS Do Variations in the Solar Cycle Latest on YouTube: It's so Cold, there can't be Global Warming /watch?v=sAvqabAPIr4&feature=sub 50% of arctic sea ice & mountain glaciers have disappeared in just 30 years. Plants, animals & insects are all migrating north. Search: Climate Change: NASA's Eyes on the Earth
I laugh when people make fun of politicians who do the right thing.
I have nothing against Al Gore, and all for what he does.
Global warming may not affect us in our life time, but the future generations will be affected tremendously, because greenhouse gases will grow in the future.
Also, this is the only planet then we can reach and survive on as human beings, we should take good care of the good fortune of having this planet, not ignore the problem.
@Boss5414 And you do believe every word Al Gore said? Is Al Gore a physicist? No Al Gore is not a physicist. Global warming is not caused by humans. The earth is warming up and cooling down naturally, with a respective increase of CO2 and decrease of CO2. This increase of CO2 (so called greenhousegasses) is a result of increased temperatures not a CAUSE of global warming.
People, do your own research instead of copying some popular hype. I'm not attacking you, open your eyes!
I'm suprised I'm still getting comments from MY comment, lol. Thank you for acknowledging and agreeing with my comment, you have given me new hope for humanity. Thank YOU!
Not sure if the AGW worshipers only Wiki (notably biased) and watch vids, If that is the case, YT has a six part documentary series on CLOUDS. based on Physicist Svensmark and his Physicist team's studies (I know 50 minutes is soooo borerrrring). If preference is to actually read about opposing theory, check out this easy reader for starters. The rest is up to you. tinyurl com/yjvrd5 Junk Science.
Everyone who refused to vote for Ralph Nader in 2000 and 2004 when they had the chance (so I am excluding prisoners and children who are denied the vote) deserves to be punished by torture and punishment for the crimes to humanity and the animals in this world that they have caused by their perversion.
How about this: Drill like crazy for oil and build cookycutter refinaries and nuclear powerstations. This will drop the price of gas down to nothing yielding trillions of dollars to develope altrnate energy sources Total win win situation except for folks like Gore who want to elite and rich with the rest of us going down the chute
Al Gore proposed leaving the lights on in the basketball courts till midnight so that the kids will stay out of trouble and come to school the following day refreshed. What logic! This moron can' spell science. But he is smart enough to push global warmimg to make 100s of millions of dollars at the expense of his country.
I don't know, I hate Bush but I wouldn't vote for Al gore either. Reason why is that he chose Joe Lieberman as vice-president and he didn't looked like he could be trusted. I'm not saying bush is better(definitely not), I'm just think both of them aren't good choices. But John Kerry was definitely better than Bush
@ShadowLuigi333 why because he made up global warming? Recently it has been PROVEN that the earth was acting normally, that there is no global warming...
Gore is so wooden....just like the trees he'd sooner replace with artificial CO2 capture masts that can double as cell phone towers!
HumanSayNo 5 months ago
global warming will barely affect scandinavia anything, but if the air gets too polluted, were all fucked.
ratmrulesyou1 5 months ago
Al Gore is a rightwing coward. He ordered the EPA to needlessly poison and murder millions of innocent animals in laboratories with the LD50 test and other horrors.
He and the Demopublican terrorist party illegally interfered with a true progressive's campaign, a true patriotic national hero: Ralph Nader. Gore was never serious about the environment and fighting global warming. PETA has done more since 1980 and deserved the Nobel Peace Prize.
mphello 7 months ago
@mphello please don't have children
sleepyhead7391 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Average Global Temperatures SPIKED +0.6C (+1.08 degrees F) since 1975.
Summer Arctic Sea Ice has dropped -50% since 1980.
Since 1950 atmospheric CO2 has spiked +30% over highest levels in 400,000+ years.
CO2 Ocean Acidification is up +30% since 1900!
Oops?
For more data & documented info. on Carbon Dioxide/CO2 Concentration, Global Surface Temperature, Arctic Sea Ice and Land Ice (Antarctica & Greenland) & Sea Levels
Search: NASA Climate Change
or go to:
climate.nasa(dot)gov/keyIndicators
goog2k 7 months ago
he does look like he could gore
ivangrozny27 9 months ago
Al Gore sucks and he's a huge liar!!! His movie sucks and is brain washing propoganda movie was full of mistakes misrepresentations and flat out lies,in fact it's so bad an english judge ruled to make him correct 9 big whopping lies and another 6 smaller fibs before any english school child was aloud to watch it.Pay Blood and Gore (that;s his company) carbon credits and he'll fix the planet for us yey mr gore youre such swell guy vomit!!!!
2wheels88 9 months ago
Al is so cool. Shame on you for not electing him!
hackebeil20 10 months ago
@hackebeil20 we did elect him...
wiscosninbadger 9 months ago
....Gore's load of BS "Inconvenient" was obvious pop-enviro propoganda in Great Britains' opinion. They required a disclaimer to be inserted at the beginning before inflicting it on imressionable grade-schoolers over there.
Unfortunately, it became gospel to much of our population here, especially those who think @ a grade school level........
baldrad1 1 year ago
David Cohen rules!
Racinette189 1 year ago
@Klaus2551010 Actully it is not an episode but rather an extra from the movie Bender's Big score in which Al Gore guest stars. btw I'm not trying to be a know it all if it comes across that way.
nikevisor54 1 year ago
how can you LIKE Al Gore?..
Gill1am 1 year ago
Comment removed
daviddevall 1 year ago
actually I think what happened with Al Gore and Bush was pretty weird.
I mean, Al won and at the last the minute they told him he didn't, WTF?
Anyway, i don't care bout the past. I care about Obama, wtf is his deal with all them mexicans and illegal immigrants in the borders; specially in Arizona, it's full of them.
No ofense to hard working mexicans who are legal and just send money to their famillies back in their country.
He's probably not gonna win the next elections if he keeps up like this
nicolas12rtu 1 year ago
science minded people seem very closed to new ideas the process of thinking science actually is about never coming up with an idea of their own. They cannot leave a thread until they feel fully satisfied their logic won out. The same type of logic has helped scientists to produce horrible disease causing agents, all in the name of progress. Don't blame me they shout i only pressed the button that lit the ovens. We prosecuted Nazi scientists but most of them ended up in the USA
ste6666666 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ste6666666 wow not only are you a fucking liar, you didn't even have the balls to write your ignorant comment as a reply.
you have no understanding of basic scientific concepts and you LIED that you were an environmental scientist.
you have shown your ignorance time and time and time again. "theories are always wrong" is just another example of your stupidity. its funny how you're so anti-science when you typing this comment on a COMPUTER that scientists invented.
AussiePolitics 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ste6666666 logic means looking at the FACTS and making a decision based on the fucking evidence. you have never even looked at any of the evidence for global warming in your life. you just thought it was bullshit and said it was some big conspiracy but you DONT EVEN UNDERSTAND IT.
oh and if scientists are so evil then why did you PRETEND TO BE ONE??? because you thought you could bullshit your way through a debate by lying about your expertise.
AussiePolitics 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
'never coming up with an idea of their own' what the fuck are you talking about? scientists are collecting data all the fucking time and people use that in multiple ways. you're an utter fuckwit if you think that all science is evil because bad people have done things in the past. by that logic all white people are evil for the bad things their race have done in the past. you are a lying fool, who has no understanding of science. stop trying to argue about something you dont understand.
AussiePolitics 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ste6666666 'They cannot leave a thread until they feel fully satisfied' you're the cunt who is so desperate to have the last word you wont reply directly to me.
and no, it is not my logic that is making me reply. my logic is telling me that you're just another lying dickhead on the internet who does not understand any of the shit you're spewing out. its my illogical, irritated part of me that keeps on replying to you because you're an ignorant fucking liar
AussiePolitics 1 year ago
@ste6666666 I can't let you get away with that. You can go on about "science minded people" and invoke the Nazis, but you can't cover up the fact that you got pwned by AussiePolitics in a debate. I mean seriously. He absolutely wiped the floor with you.
weejockpoopongmcplop 7 months ago
The governments of the world are going to use up all the oil and gas in the ground until there is none left. The Green brigade have done nothing to slow this down in fact its pace is increasing. But then plenty of legislation about carbon dioxide being a poison, hang on a minute isn't that what we breathe out. What I'm the polluter of the world along with all the other animals even dolphins. Not by using all the plastic and other junk that we have no choice to use, but just by existing.
ste6666666 1 year ago
@ste6666666 carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas. the greenhouse effect is an empirical fact and is a GOOD THING. it prevents heat leaving the earth so we have a stable temperature. the problem is when you dig up and burn for hundreds of years carbon reserves trapped underground. this INCREASES the amount of energy being trapped and it is reflected back to earth.
AussiePolitics 1 year ago
@AussiePolitics Thanks for that but i do know the theory. i was drawing a distinction between the co2 produced by burning fossil fuels and the fact that animals breathe out co2. Governments are helping us to use more fossil fuels whilst talking about population control. Think about it what are they actually saying. We want to burn fossil fuels and the poor people of the earth are going to pay for it by not existing and the wealthy through carbon taxes.
ste6666666 1 year ago
i have a degree in environmental science and to a lot of people this has become a replacement for religion, which they defend even when thousands of scientists are coming out in agreement that this global warming is a hoax. but of course the green religious zealots are not listening. James lovelock, typical eugenicist elitist. He said that he wanted to go to the moon. ok for some isn't it. I wonder how much co2 that would spew out, and at the same time wanted to reduce well, us.
ste6666666 1 year ago
@ste6666666 quite frankly I am not interested in what the nutjobs on both sides are coming out and saying, I am interested in the facts.
and the facts we KNOW are that carbon, methane and water are elements that create the greenhouse effect. if you studied environmental science you would know this is an empirical fact. so tell me, what do you think will happen when we massively increase the amount of these elements in the atmosphere? are you really saying it will have no effect?
AussiePolitics 1 year ago
@AussiePolitics Well only vote for a party that will actually reduce the amount of fossil fuels used ie by leaving them in the ground. You will not be able to because they will use all these fuels. I do not know it as an empirical fact i know it to be a theory based upon very dodgy science and skewed graphical representation of the data. If global warming was true wouldn't governments stop using the very fuels that are causing it and not blame the people. They want to cause fear.
ste6666666 1 year ago
@ste6666666 please tell me how you could have possibly studied an environmental science degree without doing a course on climatology.
yes, we do know that the other gases in the atmosphere such as nitrogen and oxygen do not trap heat, only carbon, methane and water. we have been able to measure the outgoing radiation of the planet since the 1970s with satelites and this has also empirically proven that there is less energy leaving the planet than ever before.
AussiePolitics 1 year ago
@AussiePolitics Stop using your car. I have never driven a car in my life I'm a true environmentalist. Don't buy products that are over packaged I don't. Don't believe lying governments and there agencies, that you recognise are locked into a cycle of economic growth at all costs. Even at the cost of our Earth. Why do you trust their scientists that are bought off for grant money. Plants use Co2 We will have a period of increased growth what with all that heat an all.
ste6666666 1 year ago
@ste6666666 again you make it all about ME when I am talking about the FACTS.
and no, deforestation by humans is also contributing to global warming because there are fewer trees than ever before to absorb greenhouse gases. this would have been obvious to even a first year science student. the ocean is also absorbing more carbon and heat than ever before and do you know why? because when water and carbon mix you get carbonic acid
AussiePolitics 1 year ago
@ste6666666 you say the scientists were bought off with grant money - what companies make billions of dollars each year? the oil and gas companies, who would get badly hurt by a carbon tax or change to renewable energy. if every single climatologist in the world is part of some evil taxation plot then the fossil fuel companies could quite easily have paid other experts to examine their methology and prove "BULLSHIT"
AussiePolitics 1 year ago
@ste6666666 have I mentioned a tax or a reduction in carbon emissions? no, I am discussing the facts. please tell me at what time I have ever claimed that I knew a solution or wanted to do anything about it?
"If global warming was true wouldn't governments stop using the very fuels that are causing it". no, because doing so would involve raising the cost which would mean they would get voted out of office. furthermore its a long term gradual expensive problem.
AussiePolitics 1 year ago
Yes but they have used more fossil fuels in this time frame they don't sound very worried. if you don't advocate doing anything about your theories why bother stating them. But then in the future you will be paying these taxes whether you agree with them or not. During which time governments and other elitists will be producing more of the gases that you propose are causing the problem. You in the meanwhile might be prosecuted for not recycling your rubbish that they make us use.
ste6666666 1 year ago
@ste6666666 because I am interested in the facts of the matter or do they not concern you at all?
and no, they are not my theories, they are empirical facts verified my thousands of scientists and immense amounts of data. please tell me, if climate change was such a hoax why have the giant fossil fuel emitting companies not been able to disprove it? they have the money and all they'd have to do is go through all the scientists methologies, and if there was a rat they'd find it and trumpet it.
AussiePolitics 1 year ago
@AussiePolitics But now there are thousands of scientists with the same level of education coming out on the opposite side of this. Why are you not listening to them aswell. Your views are biased fueled by fear from governments that can do nothing to change. They have to blame someone surely not themselves, well they blame me and you and all those poor people in other countries for simply breathing.
ste6666666 1 year ago
@ste6666666 really? please show me your thousands of scientists who are expert climatologists who say climate change is a lie. show me your proof for this claim. oh and don't show me a list that says 'scientists' because maths for instance is a science degree and they would know as much about atmospheric surgery as a labourer knows about rocket scientist.
AussiePolitics 1 year ago
@ste6666666 oh and actually in case you haven't read what I have been writing, I am interested in the FACTS. I dont care what they prove, but at the moment the mountain of evidence is clearly on the side of anthropogenic global warming.
if you can please direct me to a peer reviewed scientific journal written by a credible climatologist then I would be happy to say that climate change is bullshit.
AussiePolitics 1 year ago
@AussiePolitics The companies have not been hampered in any way they have their government in place why would they. they don't need to argue anything. look at the gulf to get this muck out of the ocean floor they have sacrificed a whole ocean ecosystem. They do not care for the environment they care about money and control. Why do you trust them so much. cars can run very efficiently on alcohol Oh we can make that ourselves and it gives off few emmisions. It's why its against the law.
ste6666666 1 year ago
@ste6666666 i never said I trusted the oil and gas companies - what I do trust is their desire to make MONEY. the fact of people acting on climate change would hamper their ability to make money would you not agree? so it would be in their best interests if it was a lie to show that its some big greenie religion so they dont have to worry about getting taxed extra
AussiePolitics 1 year ago
@AussiePolitics They fund the climate change brigade along with all the other elitists like Bill gates, why are people listening to this fool. and that rothschild spoilt billionaire adventurer, al gore the list goes on and on . They are spewing out these lies and pollution whilst advocating population control as the solution. The final solution more like it.and funding bad science to get control and legislation. You need to get your head out of the science books.
ste6666666 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ste6666666 "You need to get your head out of the science books" why because I shouldn't be interested in the FACTS of the matter? I am looking at the text books, the peer reviewed journals AND the raw data itself of experts from all over the world. why? because I am a REAL environmental scientist. your knowledge of science is so flimsy I doubt you have ever opened a textbook in your life.
AussiePolitics 1 year ago
@ste6666666 when you come up with the PROOF that the oil and gas companies are run by some evil global group that is funding all the environmental research of the thousands of scientists in the world, actually bother replying. you obviously have no interest in facts, just your own delusions. I have hundreds of years, thousands of experts and all the empirical evidence on my side. you have nothing but bullshit conspiracy theories and NO EVIDENCE.
AussiePolitics 1 year ago
@AussiePolitics is it normal for oil companies to take over in a military type style pieces of the USA. It is now.
ste6666666 1 year ago
@ste6666666 show me your evidence that the oil companies are funding all the climate change research. show me your evidence that thousands of climate experts have been paid to lie. at the end of the day we have KNOWN for hundreds of years about the greenhouse effect. we KNOW that carbon is one of the gases that increases this effect. the evidence is all there but you are to ignorant to see it.
AussiePolitics 1 year ago
@AussiePolitics Yes plants love it
ste6666666 1 year ago
@ste6666666 first of all how is all the excess C02 supposed to be absorbed by plants when we have destroyed most of the forests on this planet? deforestation increases every day and you say that plants are just going to absorb MORE C02? you obviously have never studied a science degree or you would not exhibit such obvious ignorance.
AussiePolitics 1 year ago
@ste6666666 who doesn't sound very worried? most scientists are worried for the long term prospects of the human race.
during your studies did you ever hear of the tree progymnosperms during your studies? they exists millions of years ago and looked similar to todays pines.
the were probably the first large trees with a canopy of photosynthetic material and do you know why they believe they went extinct? because they grew in such numbers and created so much oxygen they changed the atmosphere
AussiePolitics 1 year ago
@AussiePolitics Thats another theory along with the dinosaurs extinction, all we have is theories. And theories are always incorrect, they are only true until the next theory comes around. far too many variables are concerned here. They are obviously part of the the natural process equivalent of pioneer plants on barren rock. But we are the ultimate climax species not pioneers. Even if global warming is not a hoax population control is not the answer it is simply disguised nazi beliefs.
ste6666666 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ste6666666 ok now I know for certain that you're a liar when you said that 'theories are always incorrect'. I dislike being lied too by an ignorant fool. first of all you do not understand what a theory even is. do you want an example of a scientific theory? TRY THE THEORY OF GRAVITY.
'we are the ultimate climax species not pioneers' who says? in the earth's history we have been here a minuscule amount of time.
AussiePolitics 1 year ago
@AussiePolitics They are still discussing the theory of gravity you know those physicists, Right aggressive little person I can't believe i have spent so much of my time on a little weasel like you that can't discuss things in a civil way. Now your not an environmentalist your an aggressive little troll now go away and grow up and learn some manners.
ste6666666 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ste6666666 you say I am a weasel? you're the lying dirty bastard who claimed to have studied environmental science. you have been so wrong about everything you have claimed that it astounds me just how someone as ignorant as you can even use a computer. you are an ignorant little lying weasel. I grow tired of "debating" with an imbecile with not the slightest scientific understanding of basic concepts. tell me when has the theory of gravity EVER been proven wrong???
AussiePolitics 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ste6666666 that's why I have gotten aggressive and angry. you misrepresented yourself as being a scientific expert but every single statement you have made has made a lie of your claim. I am pissed off because I thought I was getting into a debate with a real scientist over an important issue. instead you are just a fucking idiot who not only lied, but has shown your ignorance time and time again. you are a liar, and next time dont misrepresent who you are you lying little shit
AussiePolitics 1 year ago
@AussiePolitics Explain the middle ages warm period. Explain why the data presented doesn't go back for thousands of years. We do have that data in the ice cores you know. Because we live on a big ball whizzing through space at thousands of miles an hour around a ball of varying atomic reacting hydrogen. and your expecting it to stay the same temp, get a grip. Explain what you have done about the damage you cause. but your not interested in this your not a true environmentalist.
ste6666666 1 year ago
@ste6666666 middle ages warm period was NOT as warm as today to start off with. if you watched that bullshit show the global warming swindle where they claimed it was warmed than today, they left the past 40 years of data off that graph. who the fuck says the 'present' when the data was from 1970?
AussiePolitics 1 year ago
@AussiePolitics But it was still warm now i wonder how that happened
ste6666666 1 year ago
@ste6666666 it was still warm now? what are you talking about? the scientific evidence shows that carbon is a greenhouse gas. we know that is a FACT. scientists have been able to measure that LESS energy is escaping into space directly along the wavelengths that carbon traps heat. I can send you the peer reviewed articles if you want.
your 'plants love it' statement is breathless in its ignorance. we have fewer forests than in hundreds of years and you think plants will absorb MORE???
AussiePolitics 1 year ago
@AussiePolitics Mars is heating up as are all the planets in our solar system
ste6666666 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ste6666666 "mars is heating up" now you're just repeating bullshit that only the ignorant peddle.
first of all temperatures on mars are primarily driven by dust and albedo and there is no empirical evidence to indicate that it is undergoing LONG TERM warming.
if this is a pathetic attempt to say our warming climate is due to the sun, then that is another lie - for the past 40 years the sun has been COOLING slightly. so wrong again. any more pathetic myths to throw at me?
AussiePolitics 1 year ago
@ste6666666 actually the data DOES go back thousands of years. thats exactly what the ice cores are for.
of course the climate changes over time, no one has ever said otherwise, however it is the SPEED of the warming that is unprecedented and is alarming scientists. the earth's climate changes over thousands of years, but in the past 100 years we've seen an unprecedented raise in temperature.
AussiePolitics 1 year ago
@AussiePolitics But what about Mars
ste6666666 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ste6666666 I ANSWERED IT. you are nothing but a liar. you lied to me about being an environmental scientist. only someone completely ignorant of EVERY scientific principle would ever make such a stupid comment that theories are always wrong. not only do you not understand anything about science, you do not even understand the definition of a scientific theory. LIAR. did you lie because you thought you could then bullshit your way through this debate?
AussiePolitics 1 year ago
if bush never was elected... the states would've became a haven
GoodGamesrlikemovies 1 year ago
It blows my mind that Al Gore is down to earth enough to do something like this.
samuraikarasu 1 year ago
UN wrongly linked global warming to natural disasters
From The Sunday Times
January 24, 2010
THE United Nations climate science panel faces new controversy for wrongly linking global warming to an increase in the number and severity of natural disasters such as hurricanes and floods.
It based the claims on an unpublished report that had not been subjected to routine scientific scrutiny — and ignored warnings from scientific advisers that the evidence supporting the link too weak..
Dayversion 1 year ago
Climate science news
NCAR: Scientists can't measure all heat trapped on Earth
Half of the energy captured by greenhouse gases isn't accounted for
About half of the total amount of heat entering the atmosphere is unaccounted for, according a study in Science that suggests the oceans are absorbing energy that will haunt us sooner or later.
BOULDER DAILY CAMERA
COLORADO
By Sarah Horn For the Camera
Posted: 04/15/2010 06:18:49 PM MDT
Nightversionn 1 year ago
Heat isn't "trapped" in the Ocean or the Atmosphere it is "spent" powering the Walker Circulation that moves heat around the world via the Ocean Currents (Heat to kenetic energy as heated water from ocean floorand from tropics mixes with cold water from poles) and as the heat rises of the ocean and earth surface heated air and cold air mix powering wind,hurricanes,tornadoes and as humid heated air rises and cools it makes cloulds
This "Soted Heat" by GHGs is 18th centurey bullshit
TheRealArchAngel 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Impacts of climate change in the news.
IS THIS THE END OF MIGRATION?
Climate change is affecting bird behaviour at a staggering rate; some 20 billion have already changed their flight plans.The biggest single identifiable reason behind such a massive behavioural shift, involving 70 per cent of the world's migrating birds is surprise, surprise climate change.
By Alasdair Fotheringham in Linares, Spain
Sunday, 18 April 2010
London Independent
UNITED KINGDOM
18 April 2010
Nightversionn 1 year ago
Cimate news
GLOBAL WARMING reduces grain output.
Rising temperatures and inadequate rainfall are causing grain output to stagnate in India, threatening food security in the worlds second-most populous nation, according to a weather scientist.
BLOOMBERG NEWS
April 19, 2010
Nightversionn 1 year ago
Nightversionn 1 year ago
Climate change news
MANKIND LEAVES MARK ON THE PLANET WITH THE END OF THE 12,000-YEAR HOLOCENE AGE
Geologists are about to consider whether humans themselves have started to influence the geological history of the world. They cite human-induced changes to the geology of the Earth and the global climate.
LONDON INDEPENDENT
UNITED KINGDOM
APRIL 6, 2010
Nightversionn 1 year ago
Nightversionn 1 year ago
Climate news
GREAT BARRIER REEF OIL SPILL HITS RENOWNED NATURE SANCTUARY
Oil from a huge Chinese ship which grounded in the Great Barrier Reef has hit a world-renowned nature sanctuary, officials said Wednesday, raising fears for seabirds and baby turtles now hatching there.
AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE
April 14, 2010
Nightversionn 1 year ago
Nightversionn 1 year ago
Al Gore is so sick he is way cooler than George Bush, George bush is the biggest loser ever! I hate George Bush!!
Obeseninja26 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Gore's pals China leading emitter of CO2
A study published in 2008 reports that China (which was excluded from the Kyoto requirements) became the largest emitter of CO2 from fossil fuel combustion and cement production in 2006. (Gregg, J. S., R. J. Andres, and G. Marland, China: Emissions pattern of the world leader in CO2 emissions from fossil fuel consumption and cement production, Geophysical Research Letters 35, 2008
Cap & Tax on China? Yeah right. AGW=tax scam
Thisawareness 1 year ago
HEY GOBAMA
MrApophis 1 year ago
FUCKING ASSHOLES
brokenarrow357 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Terrific new NASA YouTube:
Our Earth has a FEVER! - the Climate Change puzzle
/watch?v=XzfRs74b-qw
For excellent data & scientific info. on Climate Change search:
1) Climate Change: Key indicators
2) Climate Change: NASA's Eyes on the Earth (These are the BEST sites)
3) NASA GISS Do Variations in the Solar Cycle Affect Our Climate System
4) Climate change odds much worse than thought MIT
-- and for some other great scientific YouTubes see the greenman3610
& potholer54 channels.
goog2k 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In just FIVE YEARS between 2004-2009 the thickness of arctic ice has DROPPED 42%.
This was discovered by NASA satellite measurements. Reported 7/7/09
Search:
New NASA Satellite Survey Reveals Dramatic Arctic Sea Ice Thinning
Global Warming is changing our world NOW. CO2 is 35% above levels for 650,000 years. In just 30 years CO2 will be over 450ppm, enough to acidify oceans to the point of stopping the growth of many planktons and corals. They are at the base of the oceans' food chain.
Duh??
goog2k 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
goog2k 2 years ago
I laugh when people make fun of politicians who do the right thing.
I have nothing against Al Gore, and all for what he does.
Global warming may not affect us in our life time, but the future generations will be affected tremendously, because greenhouse gases will grow in the future.
Also, this is the only planet then we can reach and survive on as human beings, we should take good care of the good fortune of having this planet, not ignore the problem.
Oh man, some people, lol.
Boss5414 2 years ago 7
@Boss5414 And you do believe every word Al Gore said? Is Al Gore a physicist? No Al Gore is not a physicist. Global warming is not caused by humans. The earth is warming up and cooling down naturally, with a respective increase of CO2 and decrease of CO2. This increase of CO2 (so called greenhousegasses) is a result of increased temperatures not a CAUSE of global warming.
People, do your own research instead of copying some popular hype. I'm not attacking you, open your eyes!
AnneBoersma 7 months ago
@Boss5414 you have given me new hope for humanity. thank you
sleepyhead7391 6 months ago
@sleepyhead7391
I'm suprised I'm still getting comments from MY comment, lol. Thank you for acknowledging and agreeing with my comment, you have given me new hope for humanity. Thank YOU!
Boss5414 6 months ago
Comment removed
goog2k 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Not sure if the AGW worshipers only Wiki (notably biased) and watch vids, If that is the case, YT has a six part documentary series on CLOUDS. based on Physicist Svensmark and his Physicist team's studies (I know 50 minutes is soooo borerrrring). If preference is to actually read about opposing theory, check out this easy reader for starters. The rest is up to you. tinyurl com/yjvrd5 Junk Science.
Blogengezer 2 years ago
What a bunch of crap...
kensmdad 2 years ago
Another compassionate liberal, I see...
ksteiger 2 years ago
Everyone who refused to vote for Ralph Nader in 2000 and 2004 when they had the chance (so I am excluding prisoners and children who are denied the vote) deserves to be punished by torture and punishment for the crimes to humanity and the animals in this world that they have caused by their perversion.
Nader deserved the Nobel Peace Prize.
ecordy75 2 years ago
That seems a bit extreme.
friscokid182 2 years ago
How about this: Drill like crazy for oil and build cookycutter refinaries and nuclear powerstations. This will drop the price of gas down to nothing yielding trillions of dollars to develope altrnate energy sources Total win win situation except for folks like Gore who want to elite and rich with the rest of us going down the chute
collisonus 2 years ago
Al Gore proposed leaving the lights on in the basketball courts till midnight so that the kids will stay out of trouble and come to school the following day refreshed. What logic! This moron can' spell science. But he is smart enough to push global warmimg to make 100s of millions of dollars at the expense of his country.
collisonus 2 years ago
All Gore wanna be God =/
Tahvo619 2 years ago
I love how Al has a good enough sense of humor to make jokes about himself on Futurama.
tregnier279 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
that´s good because he got no humour when some1 tries to debate global warming.
because THEN he calls his security guard.
stupid bastard... he gotta run as long as he can.
because the american people could grab hold of him soon´!
NastyGreaser 2 years ago
which futuram episode is playing in the background?
Klaus2551010 2 years ago
It's a special.
Fritzer73 2 years ago
I Really Like Al Gore He's A Down to Earth Guy and Is Trying To Help Us, Shame we didnt get him as president :/
IceBlu4 2 years ago 24
coz its all rigged that why xD
thestash16 2 years ago 3
@IceBlu4 oh ya and he isnt even trying to profit off of it either...lol
Pat9201 9 months ago
I don't know, I hate Bush but I wouldn't vote for Al gore either. Reason why is that he chose Joe Lieberman as vice-president and he didn't looked like he could be trusted. I'm not saying bush is better(definitely not), I'm just think both of them aren't good choices. But John Kerry was definitely better than Bush
SolidKhalid 2 years ago
We could have had Al Gore for the past eight years instead of Bush. Oh boy.............
OrmEmber 2 years ago 7
@OrmEmber
Al Gore would have made us ride our bikes to work everyday. Bush was just the lesser of the two evils.
JoshBoschke 10 months ago
I love this...hilarious!
idiotpress 2 years ago
i like al gore he is better then bush
ShadowLuigi333 3 years ago 34
well i like clinton lol
classmassgrass 2 years ago
@ShadowLuigi333 why because he made up global warming? Recently it has been PROVEN that the earth was acting normally, that there is no global warming...
bloodthreat 1 year ago
No because Bush was the worst president ever lol
ShadowLuigi333 1 year ago
@ShadowLuigi333 Everyone´s better than Bush!
TOK150 1 year ago
@ShadowLuigi333 I think all sane people do.
bencofilms 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
bunch of a-holes.
watkinscopicat 3 years ago