Is the FPS capped at 60? I'd like to be able to use all the hz I got, and these new 120hz "3d ready" monitors are getting reviewers very enthusiastic. They all awe over how smooth windows and mouse cursor are at 120hz :)
@darkultra Hertz(hz) and Frames per second(FPS) are two different things. Let me put it like this, Frames per second determins how well something will play, if you have a poor system, and try to play a newer game, it will most likely play with low fps, which will make the game choppy. Hertz is how blurry an image or video will be on your monitor, the refresh rate, higher the hertz, the more clearer a video will look.
Does Internet explorer 9 have an advantage over Firefox, opera and chrome by using APIs or undocumented calls that are closer to the Windows kernel? I find Firefox are much slower at Direct2D than IE9.
And, what is my web experiense in... IE6? IE7? IE8?
;) ;) ;)
Don't think this will catch on. Not for a looooong time. But anyways, that is not the goal of MS either. Their goal is to "sell" the HW A as Win7/Vista only, then making people upgrade.
Since Chrome is working on HWA as well, and have come quite far, they may make a Chrome frame OR the chrome for XP with the same speed. Then this speaking of "HWA" is quite outdated ;)
So, again: What is my web experiense in IE6, 7 and 8???
@ytvoice1 Actually, they decided to quit supporting Windows XP in what was it, 2005? They've already declared they're not supporting it, that's why they didn't release Internet Explorer 9 for XP.
LEARN TO FUCKING SPELL YOU RETARDED FAT PIECE OF SHIT. You have a nice day now.
@LuigiPeach My experiense is, that Firefox is the most standard complant browser. This is from experiense with real life web pages. Every other browser has major problems, and not the same place. IE8 for example introduces errors in CSS2.1, which was not in IE7. Chrome/webkit has positioning problems, and so does Opera.
This makes me believe every company exept for Mozilla, are rushing their developing, and missing final testing.
My Opinion: Microsoft will most likely release this and then a week later release the SDK and then all the other browsers will implement it in their code and it will be standard.
IE9 isn't better its just got SDK's and API's that other developers don't have.
Personally the only reason i had IE as the standard for my client networks was the automatic domain registration with ISA Server, but now All browsers have that.
@sharpersoftware IE doesn't have to worry about being cross platform. Their APIs are probably targeting strictly directx/direct2d. it doesn't really matter anyway because IE9 won't support webgl. That's also an old stable build of chrome. Current SVN chrome runs that demo just fine for me. Gotta love the dishonest tactics of comparing Chrome stable against IE vaporware.
This i quite amazing ! ;] I really hope Microsoft gets through with IE9 , they already screwed up with the start of Windows Vista and it all went downhill from there , Microsoft is redeeming itself with Windows 7 , Windows Phone 7 series , excellent performance ! Lets hope they don't screw up with IE9 like they did with the last 3 browsers (although IE8 is quite nice in my opinion , excellent browser , although not on my 6 year old PC ;DD)
i do , but i made tests for all the popular browsers (Firefox , IE8 , Safari , Chrome and Opera ) for my shitty PC , the best is Firefox ;] so im sticking to it for now , i just don't have the cash for a new PC sadly ;( fuck the recession , it hit really freaking hard in Lithuania , 17 percent of the country right now is jobless
Surprisingly it does ;] , But my computer should run better but for some reason , i Have 1,5 Gb Ram DDR1 , Pentium 4 3,0 Ghz , FX5500 Geforce , and it runs like shit actually , it can't even run Counter Strike 1.6 normally , i produce music now , i need a good computer , and i have to stick to this piece of shit :D The cooler on my video card isn't even working
The upcomming firefox (3.7) will have hardware acceleration support, and without a doubt google chrome will have hardware support even sooner.. its the next best thing all browser companies are working on :)
IE tech team should focus on javascript performance which is extremely poor compared to chrome...
Thanks,it works amazing on my HP DM3 and i like IE9.
IE9 is like 40x faster than Chrome and Firefox 4.
You can see it when you play an Full HD video on YouTube with IE9 and than the same video with Firefox 4 or Chrome.
Than IE9 plays it perfect,and Firefox 4 and Chrome are failing big times.
u2joshua1 10 months ago
I have IE 9 beta on my PC and it is still slower than Chrome for normal browsing...but i am glad to see it support HW Acc
tony18mo 1 year ago
iv seen the clip im wonderin wat adobe works wiv the iE9 julie
julz115 1 year ago
ie9 is fantastic but it wont let you play flash games julie
julz115 1 year ago
@julz115 it does for me.
rivengle 1 year ago
Hmm I diid that test and in my chrome is faster , no like the viideOo
indochinero 1 year ago
Is the FPS capped at 60? I'd like to be able to use all the hz I got, and these new 120hz "3d ready" monitors are getting reviewers very enthusiastic. They all awe over how smooth windows and mouse cursor are at 120hz :)
darkultra 1 year ago
@darkultra Hertz(hz) and Frames per second(FPS) are two different things. Let me put it like this, Frames per second determins how well something will play, if you have a poor system, and try to play a newer game, it will most likely play with low fps, which will make the game choppy. Hertz is how blurry an image or video will be on your monitor, the refresh rate, higher the hertz, the more clearer a video will look.
iGarthi 8 months ago
Does Internet explorer 9 have an advantage over Firefox, opera and chrome by using APIs or undocumented calls that are closer to the Windows kernel? I find Firefox are much slower at Direct2D than IE9.
darkultra 1 year ago
And, what is my web experiense in... IE6? IE7? IE8?
;) ;) ;)
Don't think this will catch on. Not for a looooong time. But anyways, that is not the goal of MS either. Their goal is to "sell" the HW A as Win7/Vista only, then making people upgrade.
Since Chrome is working on HWA as well, and have come quite far, they may make a Chrome frame OR the chrome for XP with the same speed. Then this speaking of "HWA" is quite outdated ;)
So, again: What is my web experiense in IE6, 7 and 8???
ytvoice1 1 year ago
@ytvoice1 Actually, they decided to quit supporting Windows XP in what was it, 2005? They've already declared they're not supporting it, that's why they didn't release Internet Explorer 9 for XP.
LEARN TO FUCKING SPELL YOU RETARDED FAT PIECE OF SHIT. You have a nice day now.
iGarthi 8 months ago
ie 9 will consume a lot of resource. better feature always comes sacrifice
I'm staying with ie7...
hanrinch 1 year ago
@hanrinch That's where you're wrong.
grandmastgarth 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
prove me wrong
hanrinch 1 year ago
But can it lift a ball?
pascbjumper2 1 year ago
I think IE is gonna be fast and awesome like back in the day's.
Better then Chrome Or Firefox Or Safaria Or Opera.
I'm using Firefox now because IE is low atm.
But can't waith for IE9 to be released.
It will pwn every Browser.
Google sucks like always. And Safari is good but not for windows only for Mac os x.
privacyyyyy 1 year ago
@privacyyyyy You can always count on Microsoft for implementing new features nobody really needs in order to look innovative.
BTW Firefox is better with HTML5 than IE.
LuigiPeach 1 year ago
@LuigiPeach Agreed.
Opera 10.60 runs that demo at 60fps.
JoeyJoeJoe5000 1 year ago
@LuigiPeach My experiense is, that Firefox is the most standard complant browser. This is from experiense with real life web pages. Every other browser has major problems, and not the same place. IE8 for example introduces errors in CSS2.1, which was not in IE7. Chrome/webkit has positioning problems, and so does Opera.
This makes me believe every company exept for Mozilla, are rushing their developing, and missing final testing.
ytvoice1 1 year ago
@ytvoice1 The List is as follows for the major browsers - the 1. place is the one with the fewest errors in CSS:
1. Firefox
2. Opera
3. Chrome/webkit (if we are talking CSS3, Chrome jumps a place down, it is really really horrible, especially rounded corners)
4. IE8
ytvoice1 1 year ago
My Opinion: Microsoft will most likely release this and then a week later release the SDK and then all the other browsers will implement it in their code and it will be standard.
IE9 isn't better its just got SDK's and API's that other developers don't have.
Personally the only reason i had IE as the standard for my client networks was the automatic domain registration with ISA Server, but now All browsers have that.
sharpersoftware 1 year ago
@sharpersoftware IE doesn't have to worry about being cross platform. Their APIs are probably targeting strictly directx/direct2d. it doesn't really matter anyway because IE9 won't support webgl. That's also an old stable build of chrome. Current SVN chrome runs that demo just fine for me. Gotta love the dishonest tactics of comparing Chrome stable against IE vaporware.
Ormaaj 1 year ago
i have not faith in explorer...
mezclasraras 1 year ago
Why is there color differences ?
It is not part of hardware accelerated graphics to change it, isn't it ?
arfason 1 year ago
IE SHould DIE.
You fuckers make shit software and it is frustrating coding on your stupid but popular platform.
We spend 30% extra time doing IE related bugs.
xrimpy 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@xrimpy "We spend 30% extra time doing IE related bugs.".
This number will go up when all the browsers implement html5 features. I hope that Microsoft will strive to become standard compliant.
anotherelvis 1 year ago
Love this! 10/10
jnrolf 1 year ago
Does it still have huge security holes, a long ass start-up time, and a long ass web page loading time?
mostliberal 1 year ago 2
Yeah? What is this good for, except perhaps flash games?
FuckYouLetMeLogIn 1 year ago
sites render more quickly, so the end user experience is a bit better (its not just for fancy 3d stuff).
24065894 1 year ago
This i quite amazing ! ;] I really hope Microsoft gets through with IE9 , they already screwed up with the start of Windows Vista and it all went downhill from there , Microsoft is redeeming itself with Windows 7 , Windows Phone 7 series , excellent performance ! Lets hope they don't screw up with IE9 like they did with the last 3 browsers (although IE8 is quite nice in my opinion , excellent browser , although not on my 6 year old PC ;DD)
FlowTraceur 1 year ago
hehe, use google chrome on your 6 year old pc ;)
24065894 1 year ago
i do , but i made tests for all the popular browsers (Firefox , IE8 , Safari , Chrome and Opera ) for my shitty PC , the best is Firefox ;] so im sticking to it for now , i just don't have the cash for a new PC sadly ;( fuck the recession , it hit really freaking hard in Lithuania , 17 percent of the country right now is jobless
FlowTraceur 1 year ago
sux yep, I know how that feels :(
Though it suprises me that firefox runs nicer on your 6 year old pc, I dont see that very often :)
24065894 1 year ago
Surprisingly it does ;] , But my computer should run better but for some reason , i Have 1,5 Gb Ram DDR1 , Pentium 4 3,0 Ghz , FX5500 Geforce , and it runs like shit actually , it can't even run Counter Strike 1.6 normally , i produce music now , i need a good computer , and i have to stick to this piece of shit :D The cooler on my video card isn't even working
FlowTraceur 1 year ago
awesome! Chrome is great, but this could be the only reason I switch back to IE one day
Kmezon2 1 year ago
Interesting. Is hardware utilization new to browsers? Do other browsers use hardware like IE9?
shmookins 1 year ago
The upcomming firefox (3.7) will have hardware acceleration support, and without a doubt google chrome will have hardware support even sooner.. its the next best thing all browser companies are working on :)
IE tech team should focus on javascript performance which is extremely poor compared to chrome...
24065894 1 year ago
Thank you for a very educational post/reply. :)
shmookins 1 year ago
@24065894 They're working on that as well, though I doubt it'll be able to compete with Chrome's JavaScript integration.
pascbjumper2 1 year ago