Added: 3 years ago
From: CNN911Fakes
Views: 1,645
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (24)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Yes, good catch. There shouldn't even be a gum wrapper inserted into a true crime scene, and there's that hunk of junk.

    Something odd - am I seeing things, or @ 0:50, is there no shadow thrown from the wooden pole which the third guy is about to pass?

  • nameofthepen

    I see what you are talking about. That is, I think, actually a sign post. Hard to tell!

    I think it should.

  • mt3355....when someone is INVESTIGATING a crime, shouldn't they they TRY to find THE MURDER WEAPON??....do the "truther" ask for any evidence about the alleged airplanes that SUPPOSEDLY crashed in the WTC HIT THE PENTAGON AND CRASHED IN PENNSYLVANIA,?????

    NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO, THEY DON'T.

  • the guy benath want us to look A GHOST..LOL

  • CNN911Fakes you should add a l to your name. CNN911Flakes

    You are a disgrace to 911 truth seekers every where.

    I think you are a plant to make the cause look stupid and your doing a great job.

  • mt3355

    You know me well enough to know what I think of empty ad hominem attacks. I delete them.

    YOu are welcome to find an error and report it in any one of my videos. YOu are also welcome to one and only one negative opinion without justification.

    Facts never contradict truth. I present only facts.

  • out of focus blurry photos of a peice of wreckage. Is this like your blue tent comment?

  • carnivoreeschelon;

    master of nonesense and nonsequiters.

    Doesn't kinow English.

    Doesn't know 911.

  • Thank you for admitting that you do not know what you are talking about

  • Do you have ANY evidence at all to show it was "planted" there and not just moved there hrs later that afternoon?

    You say No record of it being moved?

    Do you have a record it being planted?

    So they wait until "Late Afternoon" before planting the evidence?

    They wait for hrs after the crash and hrs after reporters & everyone have already taken pictures (as you just showed) to sneak in and plant fake pcs of evidence?

    Makes perfect sense to me!...lol

  • marksman500, you're such a joke. Yeh, the cop who drops his "drop" weapon on the guy he just illegally executed alwats keeps a record of the drop.

    Oh, wait, that's wrong. People try to cover their tracks when they plant evidence.

    Proof it was planted is in the video; it is considered tangible evidence and it wasn't there when it should have been.

  • CNNFakes,

    ... "marksman500 you're such a joke."...

    (So we are name-calling all ready are we?) ..."Proof it was planted is in the video; it is considered tangible evidence and it wasn't there when it should have been."...

    (And when was that?

    When should it have been there?

    Who from the Govt. has ever claimed that particular pc was found there from the result of the plane crashing?)

  • marksman500,

    You have been working 911 for several years now and you don't know when the pentagon event occured?

    Maybe you're just a waste of time.

    ps, that's Joe Craine's argument that, in fact, the "C" piece is not part of the official record and, therefore doesn't count as evidence of a plane crash.

    Thanks for the support.

  • CNNFakes..."marksman500, You have been working 911 for several years now and you don't know when the pentagon event occured?

    Maybe you're just a waste of time."..

    (Maybe you should learn how to tell time.

    Quote from your vid, 911 Pentagon C. Rush Limbaugh Simple "Late afternoon it appeared", too bad Your Video "Proof AA77 Fuselage was Planted at 0.44 shows the C pc there and fire burning, so it was not .."Late afternoon it appeared".. as you claim

    Maybe you're just a waste of time.)

  • Okay, I still don't get this damn video. Please explain what it's showing on the info bar! Maybe it's obvious to some people, but to a layman like me, it's not!

  • This video assumes you know that no airplane debris was found at the pentagon, but, later, some turned up.

    Among stuff that turned up was an apparent piece of fuselage that had a letter C on it. It was found near the firestation.

    Please see

    watch?v=G8mAjlliHK8

    for an easier explanation of the same issue.

  • Try this one

    watch?v=RgTVchBl13o

    It's a little clearer.

  • solid research!

  • "Captain "Chic" Burlingame was, sadly, the Captain of AA 77 which was taken out over the Atlantic and vaporized while the Happy Hooligan flight of 3 that scrambled off Langley AFB at 0932 on 9/11 and then were intentionally sent on a "rabbit trail," 090/60, thereby preventing them from a VID of the Raytheon modified A3 Skywarrior that followed an AGM through a 16 foot hole in the wall; which promised to be the "chink" in their armor."

  • Winston Churchill reportedly gave a commencement address that's fits YT standards and character limits;

    'Never give up. Never, ever give up'

    Thanks.

    Please get these videos out there before I, like Joe before me, am disappeared.

  • And another thing, it seems that the circle is not in the correct spot where the shadow appears and disappears. It's just a little further to the right.

  • Also, the only picture that clearly shows the black burn mark is taken from inside the pentagons shade. Or at least on the very edge of the shade and light barrier.

    I'm talking about the picture of Rumsfield walking towards the building with the white firetruck in the background. Look at the light line, and you should be able to understand why the mark is visible there in that picture, and not the others.

  • He's pointing out the presence of burn marks in some photos and the lack of burn marks in other photos.

    The circle shows the same spot in each photo where there is or is not a burn mark.

    My suggestion to anyone watching this is that they do a little research into photography and the effects of light and backlight. Each time the burn mark appears is where there's no backlight. When there is backlight, it disappears. Blame the camera, not the lack of evidence.

  • Venath, thanks for commenting, but...

    What video are you talking about? What burn mark? There are/were no burn marks on the west side of the fire station.

    Have you thought about why it is called

    'from C to shining C'

    Have you read the other posts?

  • Hello, JoeCraine01.

  • Careful. Joe is 'persona non grata' on YouTube, hence the 'Martyr' handle. YT actually deleted non-JoeCraine accounts in the zealousness to stop his unacceptable behavior.

    I am not Joe Craine; but, he has provided all of his images that he found and is the researcher behind these videos.

    Thanks for the compliment.

  • this is the stupidest video of life or pictures.

  • ""The part showed up later after everyone was chased away.

    When they were allowed back there was lots of debris scattered about.""

    Everyone was chased away??

    Are you kidding?

    ....or did the lunch bell sound, and while everyone was in the cafeteria....

    HAHA

  • pristine conditioned lawns?...the plane didn't hit the bloody lawn.....it hit the pentagon.......Hello?

  • Gotcha, I just wasnt sure exactly what u were getting at. Thanks

  • Not sure what you are trying to point out? Please elaborate.

  • the spot that is being circled is the exact spot that the most shown piece of "plane evidence" was supposedly found, and there are many photos used as proof that an AA jet crashed there. look into it for yourself

  • Thanks for pointing that out, daliOtter!

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more