Hahaha...nice..I like how say you turned down the revenue when it's a bit obvious you filled out the form and were rejected cause it wasn't family friendly (it's all recorded online - your completed form is right there)...lol. But yeah - I would probably have said that too ;) ;) Don't worry - I won't tell:)
ThEbEaSt8651. If u actually watch the film u will see , there ain't no bullets in the gun when Georgie Shoots! It,s been re, edited . By the way the bad guys win in the end!
@Kinaces No, but I assumed that you would be clever enough to do a google search and realize that John Zorn has never done anything remotely close to 'screamo', despite the auditory evidence already illustrating this point. Way to be a soppy cunt, though.
Right..so what would you categorize this song be exactly? It's just screaming..Don't you think it's a logical jump to assume its "screamo." Also I'm not talking about the artists other songs, cause they are irrelevant to the song playing in this scene.
@Kinaces It's not just screaming. There are instruments being played. If one were to categorize Zorn/Naked city, it would fall into the experiemental/thrash/jazz category long before 'screamo'.
Sure it's not just screaming, but wouldn't you say that music isn't just classified by the instruments? That each genre has a "style" of vocals and singing along with instruments. So as for the vocals you can safely assume that this would be screamo or something related. As for the instruments, you said they are categorized as experimental/thrash. If you havn't noticed, experimental/thrash is a sub genre of heavy metal.
Screamo is somewhat a genre of heavy metal, using the instruments and style of aggressive instruments with screaming vocals...Screaming vocals, hardcore/metal/aggressive instruments..Not to hard to see why people think it's screamo when it fits the definition so well..
lol i thought the gun would fall or he would stumble i didnt expect a fake blooper where he dies (ps the noise in back ground is mom geting cut to bits)
wait iv seen this movie and doesn't the little boy get killed so then how does he kill the other guy .... unless someone edited this scene or something?
he pushed the volume button rather than the rewind
Revealing mistakes: When Paul "rewinds" the film he presses the Volume Down (-) button on the remote control rather than the Rewind button.
The mobile phone the couple attempt to use to call the Police after their son's shooting is a Nokia. When switched on, a Nokia start up tone is used. However, the key tone is that of a Motorola (the tone is heard when they press the Call button after 911).
wow. you really have that much time on your hands?
and also, it doesn't very much matter, its all for the visual effect of him hitting the back button and most people recognize the motorola sounds more.
If the shot was powerful enough to blow the victim through the wall -- that is, the "action" was that powerful, then the "reaction" would have been equally powerful and it would have blown the kid back through the wall.
What you're saying is not true. The pressure inside the canon of the gun is channelized and applied onto the WEAKER element (BULLET as opposed to the kid) in priority and almost ENTIRELY. And the hit guy gets the entire pressure from the thrown bullet. This is why you can greatly damage a gun canon by shooting AT it but not shooting with IT.
The force of the explosion is expended in *two* equal but opposite directions. Tiny slug moves forward very fast. Gun and user move back slowly a little.
If you had two slugs in the middle of a gun barrel open at both ends and set off a cartridge charge in between them, both slugs would set off in equal but opposite directions.
Replace one of the slugs with a closed end and a man holding the gun. Same deal. The "opposite force" pushing against the man holding the gun is the same.
The forces of the explosion ARE channelized and expended into two opposite direction but most of it will in a fraction of second be expending towards the bullet side which offers less resistance. There is LESS force towards the gun holder. if you squeeze an open bottle filled with water, there will be less force on the closed side because of the open side releasing the water and pressure. if both sides were open or closed; (equal resistance; your example) then yeah the pressure will be equal.
And actually the forces after the explosion are spread in ALL direction before being quickly channelized by the barrel into the open side blowing the bullet out. there is just as much pressure on the sides of the the barrel as on the top and bottom of it as in it's closed back. But the force is quickly channelized. When you shoot a bazooka (which does blow targeted people back), the shooter isn't blown back like the target.
When you throw mass in one direction, you move back in an *equal but opposite" direction (minus friction),
This is physics. It's universally true whether you are shooting water out of a hose, sitting on a sled on a sheet of ice and flinging bricks, shooting a rocket jet out of the end of a rocket or firing a bullet out of the end of a gun.
Reaction is equal and opposite. The point *isn't* the explosion. The point is the mass. I'd be flung back if the bullet was thrown with an elastic band.
LMFAO!!
hahaYOUREdead1 6 months ago 3
Hahaha...nice..I like how say you turned down the revenue when it's a bit obvious you filled out the form and were rejected cause it wasn't family friendly (it's all recorded online - your completed form is right there)...lol. But yeah - I would probably have said that too ;) ;) Don't worry - I won't tell:)
weirdcitykid 6 months ago
@weirdcitykid huh?
thekingoffunnyfaces 4 months ago
ThEbEaSt8651. If u actually watch the film u will see , there ain't no bullets in the gun when Georgie Shoots! It,s been re, edited . By the way the bad guys win in the end!
Matthew9818 7 months ago
I havent seen the end, this video ruined it for me :/
ThEbEaSt8651 9 months ago
@ThEbEaSt8651 no it didnt...
51lav 8 months ago
@ThEbEaSt8651 Your not the only one *Sobs*
GameAmy 6 months ago
@ThEbEaSt8651 goddamn it, me too -_-
yourpainismygain 4 months ago
LMAO douchebag!
skulldrix 9 months ago
This is literally one of the "funniest" things I've seen on Youtube....for a while. Great job editing.
JesusCristo2002 9 months ago
name of the guy screams with Zorn's Naked City project is Tetsuro Yamarsuke Eye
ThePerdurabo 10 months ago
You stupid fucks, it's not 'screamo'. It's John Zorn/Naked City. Jesus christ, kids today.
cfrankenstein 11 months ago
@cfrankenstein
Yes. Cause telling us the artist's name will completely change what genre it's under.
Kinaces 11 months ago
@Kinaces No, but I assumed that you would be clever enough to do a google search and realize that John Zorn has never done anything remotely close to 'screamo', despite the auditory evidence already illustrating this point. Way to be a soppy cunt, though.
cfrankenstein 9 months ago
@cfrankenstein
Right..so what would you categorize this song be exactly? It's just screaming..Don't you think it's a logical jump to assume its "screamo." Also I'm not talking about the artists other songs, cause they are irrelevant to the song playing in this scene.
Kinaces 9 months ago
@Kinaces It's not just screaming. There are instruments being played. If one were to categorize Zorn/Naked city, it would fall into the experiemental/thrash/jazz category long before 'screamo'.
cfrankenstein 9 months ago
@cfrankenstein
Sure it's not just screaming, but wouldn't you say that music isn't just classified by the instruments? That each genre has a "style" of vocals and singing along with instruments. So as for the vocals you can safely assume that this would be screamo or something related. As for the instruments, you said they are categorized as experimental/thrash. If you havn't noticed, experimental/thrash is a sub genre of heavy metal.
Kinaces 8 months ago
@cfrankenstein
Screamo is somewhat a genre of heavy metal, using the instruments and style of aggressive instruments with screaming vocals...Screaming vocals, hardcore/metal/aggressive instruments..Not to hard to see why people think it's screamo when it fits the definition so well..
Kinaces 8 months ago
hahahahahahaahhhahah
youth94 1 year ago
i like this ending better beavis
huh huh - huh huh
Ramiro1000000 1 year ago 3
i like this ending better
Ramiro1000000 1 year ago
I watched this the other day.
WHAT A MOVIE! :)
MelissaAnnDarko 1 year ago
Duh...
ChronologyFilms 1 year ago
WTF!
Why is the chick screaming in the backround?
MelissaAnnDarko 1 year ago
@MelissaAnnDarko its a screamo song paul played while looking for georgie
coolikeirishdopamine 1 year ago
@coolikeirishdopamine its not screamo. get a life
MrsChasen91 1 year ago
lol i thought the gun would fall or he would stumble i didnt expect a fake blooper where he dies (ps the noise in back ground is mom geting cut to bits)
imamanofmyword1 1 year ago
@imamanofmyword1 no its not its the song paul played when he was looking for georgie. some crazy awesome screamo song haha
coolikeirishdopamine 1 year ago
18,000 views in 2 years is not popular Youtube did not offer you any money.
TheTimidRockstar 1 year ago
@nihhga I know, dude. I've seen it many times. That's why I winked ;)
ScovilleIsNotATown 1 year ago
haha.
poolomoomin 1 year ago
Haha thanks for ruining the movie ;)
ScovilleIsNotATown 1 year ago 2
saw this last night wicked film i was freaked out when he kept looking straight into the camera
deniselambert9395 1 year ago
hahaha good one :P
negativecreepx 1 year ago
wait iv seen this movie and doesn't the little boy get killed so then how does he kill the other guy .... unless someone edited this scene or something?
ms2gud1234 1 year ago
@ms2gud1234 its edited. theres nothing really in the gun there.
pinkduhhh 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ms2gud1234. its edited. theres nothing really in the gun at this part.
pinkduhhh 1 year ago
@ms2gud1234
Nice spoiler
meatwad53 1 year ago
@meatwad53 Oops sorry ^_^'
ms2gud1234 1 year ago
@ms2gud1234
It's alright XD I planned on watching it earlier but sort of too lazy :P
meatwad53 1 year ago
Creepy but funny.
Annachronism68 1 year ago
that song is awesome, i love naked city.
resisthexcept 1 year ago
wha? you must be a retarded shit-monkey.
notsoseriousanymore 1 year ago
I wish that was how it went:O
Misscopperfield 2 years ago
yeh he killd that bich
ig299 2 years ago
LOL, PWN3D
wecoctm 2 years ago
Hahahaha...funny.
kingsod 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
i watched this last night. was creepy in a way but th 2 faggots wer hard to take serious
michael887799 2 years ago
XD I thought it was really a blooper!
EdgeHead579 2 years ago 30
@EdgeHead579 me 2 u_u
zexiklauzexi 1 year ago
*grabs remote and rewinds* XD
bloodydragon 2 years ago 39
that part of the movie i was like "wtf, theyre doin it like waynes world!"
xxTERRORISTxx197 2 years ago
lmao it made me go wtf too XD this is a reality horror not a fantasy XD
bloodydragon 2 years ago
It's psychcological thriller... so things happen xD
Sniffer194 2 years ago
we like those things xD
bloodydragon 2 years ago
he pushed the volume button rather than the rewind
Revealing mistakes: When Paul "rewinds" the film he presses the Volume Down (-) button on the remote control rather than the Rewind button.
The mobile phone the couple attempt to use to call the Police after their son's shooting is a Nokia. When switched on, a Nokia start up tone is used. However, the key tone is that of a Motorola (the tone is heard when they press the Call button after 911).
imalovedrunk 2 years ago 3
what?
MsCrazyminded 2 years ago
@imalovedrunk omg.
vmaryz 2 years ago
wow. you really have that much time on your hands?
and also, it doesn't very much matter, its all for the visual effect of him hitting the back button and most people recognize the motorola sounds more.
malcolmcox 2 years ago
@bloodydragon oh god that part was sooo stupid! XD i was actually enjoying it until the rewinding part! lol
blackoreo124 1 year ago
brilliant!
TheFunnyGamer 2 years ago
HAHAHAHA <3
pornomimes 2 years ago
hahaha
MrColdStove 2 years ago
that part is good
darasudus100 2 years ago
hahah i love that scene when he gets shot and goes flying 20 ft. georgies looks like bam bam
wman02332 2 years ago 4
Can someone explain how a gun shot can send someone flying like they're in a damn martial arts movie ?!?!? 0:21
awesomeon 2 years ago
because it is a movie?
c0nman101 2 years ago 3
yeah, but it's still funny..........
awesomeon 2 years ago 3
its a shot a 20 gadge shottie
that is possible.
bunga707 2 years ago
If the shot was powerful enough to blow the victim through the wall -- that is, the "action" was that powerful, then the "reaction" would have been equally powerful and it would have blown the kid back through the wall.
prodprod 2 years ago 3
What you're saying is not true. The pressure inside the canon of the gun is channelized and applied onto the WEAKER element (BULLET as opposed to the kid) in priority and almost ENTIRELY. And the hit guy gets the entire pressure from the thrown bullet. This is why you can greatly damage a gun canon by shooting AT it but not shooting with IT.
gabrielfrancois 2 years ago
The force of the explosion is expended in *two* equal but opposite directions. Tiny slug moves forward very fast. Gun and user move back slowly a little.
If you had two slugs in the middle of a gun barrel open at both ends and set off a cartridge charge in between them, both slugs would set off in equal but opposite directions.
Replace one of the slugs with a closed end and a man holding the gun. Same deal. The "opposite force" pushing against the man holding the gun is the same.
prodprod 2 years ago
The forces of the explosion ARE channelized and expended into two opposite direction but most of it will in a fraction of second be expending towards the bullet side which offers less resistance. There is LESS force towards the gun holder. if you squeeze an open bottle filled with water, there will be less force on the closed side because of the open side releasing the water and pressure. if both sides were open or closed; (equal resistance; your example) then yeah the pressure will be equal.
gabrielfrancois 2 years ago
And actually the forces after the explosion are spread in ALL direction before being quickly channelized by the barrel into the open side blowing the bullet out. there is just as much pressure on the sides of the the barrel as on the top and bottom of it as in it's closed back. But the force is quickly channelized. When you shoot a bazooka (which does blow targeted people back), the shooter isn't blown back like the target.
gabrielfrancois 2 years ago
When you throw mass in one direction, you move back in an *equal but opposite" direction (minus friction),
This is physics. It's universally true whether you are shooting water out of a hose, sitting on a sled on a sheet of ice and flinging bricks, shooting a rocket jet out of the end of a rocket or firing a bullet out of the end of a gun.
Reaction is equal and opposite. The point *isn't* the explosion. The point is the mass. I'd be flung back if the bullet was thrown with an elastic band.
prodprod 2 years ago
wow...
anarchyXever 2 years ago
owned lol
kingxnick 2 years ago
Ownage xD!
FanChrisproductions 2 years ago
erm, not sure what to say.
STOP KILLING AN EFFINK BRILLIANT FILM!
shavoisgod 2 years ago
lol haha XD
Sps7890 3 years ago 2
-___-'
iinesmary 3 years ago
ouch
lovefink2 3 years ago 2