that halogen is a creeper
bluestreek004 3 months ago
attack from behind...
JulixHartley 10 months ago
so the difference between an sn1 and sn2 reaction isthat theres that many reactants involved in the process.
junior1984able 11 months ago
This isn't correct, the nucleophile attacks at 180degrees to the leaving group- an anti attack, and the carbon being attacked undergoes INVERSION OF CONFIGURATION during the reaction. The inversion isn't shown here.
busybee340 1 year ago
@busybee340 actually the inversion is show.....
inferno46n2 1 year ago
@busybee340 yup, @OT, maybe you would want to show a transition state or some sort of inversion of configuration?
GMBeasting 9 months ago
thank you very much for this vedio
terre0jk 1 year ago
thnx very helpful
coolnorules 2 years ago
THIS SUCKS
it didnt even invert
tammyshui 2 years ago
...yeah it did >_>
cloudsymph 2 years ago 4
This isn't even a chiral center to begin with. There's no R, S orientation.
GoChargers416 2 years ago
Stereocenter, you'd mean....the term chiral center is conceptually wrong...
SOYUZ1968 2 years ago
Poor carbonyl keeps getting attacked by nasty Mr Grignard.
otleybey 3 years ago
ahahahahahaa good joke, +1 xDDD
Ryuta19 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@otleybey
Do you even know what you're watching?
bn740433 1 year ago
attack from the back
halistall07 3 years ago 11
very n1
lexani88 3 years ago
thanks. thanks.. thanks. :)
pimezon 3 years ago
R becomes S, or vica versa, MOST of the time depending on CIP priority changes
jpetrucci05 4 years ago
backside attack
DODGE222 4 years ago
whaatt need more detail
capriccioso35 4 years ago
INVERTED PRODUCT!
Paedomorphosis 4 years ago
sexy ;)
hamsterpoop 4 years ago
that halogen is a creeper
bluestreek004 3 months ago
attack from behind...
JulixHartley 10 months ago
so the difference between an sn1 and sn2 reaction isthat theres that many reactants involved in the process.
junior1984able 11 months ago
This isn't correct, the nucleophile attacks at 180degrees to the leaving group- an anti attack, and the carbon being attacked undergoes INVERSION OF CONFIGURATION during the reaction. The inversion isn't shown here.
busybee340 1 year ago
@busybee340 actually the inversion is show.....
inferno46n2 1 year ago
@busybee340 yup, @OT, maybe you would want to show a transition state or some sort of inversion of configuration?
GMBeasting 9 months ago
thank you very much for this vedio
terre0jk 1 year ago
thnx very helpful
coolnorules 2 years ago
THIS SUCKS
it didnt even invert
tammyshui 2 years ago
...yeah it did >_>
cloudsymph 2 years ago 4
This isn't even a chiral center to begin with. There's no R, S orientation.
GoChargers416 2 years ago
Stereocenter, you'd mean....the term chiral center is conceptually wrong...
SOYUZ1968 2 years ago
Poor carbonyl keeps getting attacked by nasty Mr Grignard.
otleybey 3 years ago
ahahahahahaa good joke, +1 xDDD
Ryuta19 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@otleybey
Do you even know what you're watching?
bn740433 1 year ago
attack from the back
halistall07 3 years ago 11
very n1
lexani88 3 years ago
thanks. thanks.. thanks. :)
pimezon 3 years ago
R becomes S, or vica versa, MOST of the time depending on CIP priority changes
jpetrucci05 4 years ago
backside attack
DODGE222 4 years ago
whaatt need more detail
capriccioso35 4 years ago
INVERTED PRODUCT!
Paedomorphosis 4 years ago
sexy ;)
hamsterpoop 4 years ago