Even if the story was that they had to plant explosives to safely collapse the buildings, the explosives would have had to have been planted well in advance of 911, which indicate malice of forethought on the part of those who planted the explosives. Also, the impact and fire only killed part of the 3000 that died that day. It was the collapse of the buildings that killed most! Later, the firefighters, first responders, and cleanup crews would start dropping like flies.
"... or it would be taken down. I would imagine it came down on its own"?
What other POSSIBLE way could it have come down that day - unless its destruction had been pre-planned?
Those who say "the firemen knew it was coming down" therefore they must have seen it was unstable from the fires are full of it. This clip shows that they KNEW it was coming down because they had been TOLD it was coming down - either "on its own" or pulled. Thanks for posting this.
"Like watching the collapse of an active volcano....." which means A LOT OF ENERGY WAS NEEDED TO BRING THIS BUILDING DOWN and thus create a PYROCLASTIC FLOW!!!
Curious how the plume seems to keep going up and up towards the end of this clip. A few office fires and gravity can not make that happen.
"Demolished for Safety" was the first official story. That is why we got the story from so many officials! At the last minute, Rudy Giuliani or some other sissy bureaucrat decided that story was too rough, too close to the truth, or otherwise too dangerous to let the public have it. That's why "fire collapse" and "fell down by itself" were sent out instead, lame as they might be.
Strange how the visible timecode display at the bottom of the screen is so erroneous? It is reading about half an earlier than when the event (WTC7 collapse) took place.
Yea, normally it would be expected to come down on it's own. But strange things happened on 911 that never happened before in the history of the world. BTW, FL 93 was most likely scheduled to fly into WTC 7 after the towers were imploded. But it was shot down. But 7 had to come down anyway because of all the wires and explosives. Search engine; 9/11 Shock Opera… Act 4 – Building 7 and Flight 93: The Grand Finale that Wasn’t
@jbrider555 actually, a ton of spelling errors in the second half really ruin the article, who the fuck proofread this tihng? lol, it's still a good read though :)
@Skeptic121 "Nowadays they just rewrite government press releases." Yeah, makes you wonder where they got that "would be taken down" from, huh? Sounds like they were talking to the same people Silverstein was before he got the go ahead from his insurers to "pull it".
Wow, just wow - it's practically another "Pull it!" but this time preceded with video of a volcano-like explosion. THANK YOU for showing us the truth!
Even if the story was that they had to plant explosives to safely collapse the buildings, the explosives would have had to have been planted well in advance of 911, which indicate malice of forethought on the part of those who planted the explosives. Also, the impact and fire only killed part of the 3000 that died that day. It was the collapse of the buildings that killed most! Later, the firefighters, first responders, and cleanup crews would start dropping like flies.
romeoechomike369 1 year ago
"You guys knew this was coming all day." asked Williams
"We had heard reports that the building was unstable." responds Restuccio.
My question...Who were these reports coming from?
no2globalism 1 year ago
@no2globalism
I think Bill Clinton wants to answer that:
"How dare you? How dare you?"
Matu1 1 year ago
"... or it would be taken down. I would imagine it came down on its own"?
What other POSSIBLE way could it have come down that day - unless its destruction had been pre-planned?
Those who say "the firemen knew it was coming down" therefore they must have seen it was unstable from the fires are full of it. This clip shows that they KNEW it was coming down because they had been TOLD it was coming down - either "on its own" or pulled. Thanks for posting this.
ThePeage 1 year ago
Looks like the last sentence is cut off.. like he wants to say "..but it was taken down."
Very suspicious editing here, for my taste.
4B5PR1T20R 1 year ago
"Like watching the collapse of an active volcano....." which means A LOT OF ENERGY WAS NEEDED TO BRING THIS BUILDING DOWN and thus create a PYROCLASTIC FLOW!!!
Curious how the plume seems to keep going up and up towards the end of this clip. A few office fires and gravity can not make that happen.
8DoverNJ 1 year ago 7
"Demolished for Safety" was the first official story. That is why we got the story from so many officials! At the last minute, Rudy Giuliani or some other sissy bureaucrat decided that story was too rough, too close to the truth, or otherwise too dangerous to let the public have it. That's why "fire collapse" and "fell down by itself" were sent out instead, lame as they might be.
Skeptic121 1 year ago 6
Strange how the visible timecode display at the bottom of the screen is so erroneous? It is reading about half an earlier than when the event (WTC7 collapse) took place.
jcrewe1000 1 year ago
Yea, normally it would be expected to come down on it's own. But strange things happened on 911 that never happened before in the history of the world. BTW, FL 93 was most likely scheduled to fly into WTC 7 after the towers were imploded. But it was shot down. But 7 had to come down anyway because of all the wires and explosives. Search engine; 9/11 Shock Opera… Act 4 – Building 7 and Flight 93: The Grand Finale that Wasn’t
jbrider555 1 year ago
@jbrider555 That's a well written article, thanks!
GtheMVP 1 year ago
@jbrider555 actually, a ton of spelling errors in the second half really ruin the article, who the fuck proofread this tihng? lol, it's still a good read though :)
GtheMVP 1 year ago
Journalism 101: Who, what, when, where, why
"would be taken down"
WHO would take it down?
WHAT would they do to take it down?
WHEN would they do it?
WHERE would they do what they do; basement, Con Ed substation, beams, core, peripheral beams...
WHY ...fine, we have the answer to that question..the building was damaged.
Why not some of the other damaged buildings. Yes, journalists are SUPPOSED to be annoying! Nowadays they just rewrite government press releases.
Skeptic121 1 year ago
@Skeptic121 You really hit the nail on the head
dtmbcorp 1 year ago
@Skeptic121 "Nowadays they just rewrite government press releases." Yeah, makes you wonder where they got that "would be taken down" from, huh? Sounds like they were talking to the same people Silverstein was before he got the go ahead from his insurers to "pull it".
watch?v=9Q5S0ehGhR4
PolarBearMVG 1 year ago
wut a great imagination he has every1 else saw a controlld demo
JvillnEnt 1 year ago
Wow, just wow - it's practically another "Pull it!" but this time preceded with video of a volcano-like explosion. THANK YOU for showing us the truth!
PolarBearMVG 1 year ago