Added: 2 years ago
From: russiadefence
Views: 130,196
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (330)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • All glory to Soviet Engineers!

  • this is like porn

  • Far better than Apache !!!!!!!!!!!11

  • @Rafiullahize: So why did India chose the Apache & not the "far better" Mi-28N?

  • @TankNutJohn89 because indians are stupid. they dont know war tactics.

  • @Rafiullahize: I wouldn't say, all indians are stupid. They don't have Combat Experience, but they have tested the capabilitys of both helicopters, and the Apache won because it was superior in 20 different technical options.

  • those FLIR cameras sure have shit load of noise and vibration comparing to AH64 infrared imaging..

  • No lock on system required all you need to do is stare Russia 1 America 0

  • Heh its funny watching the "my dick is bigger than yours" charade going on here with military hardware.

  • @Tressiensia You loser, and your country of losers

  • you even cant deal with chechen guys :)

  • @ccplusc Already dealt with them. War was officially over since 2009, good morning.

  • It's truely sad that the Russians who always built the most elegant military planes and helicopters came up with such an ugly design like the mil-28's. Of course, they were about to beat their NATO counterpart in every aspect, but there was no need to beat the Apache in ugliness, which it set a milestone for! With its bubble nose mil-28 looks like Goofy and the view from those tiny windows must be horrible! Please, Mil, make a face lift and let the 28 look as cool as the 24 and the 26!

  • @daAnder71 but... We also have a Ka-52, so don't worry, we are steel elegant :)

  • @daAnder71 It needs to be intimidating not pretty and cute. And Mi-28 is sure as hell more intimidating looking than AH-64.

  • i remember a documentary where they compare russia with usa, usa repairs their military equipment with a scalpel and russia repair theirs with a hammer.

    in a war do you have time for a scalpel or a hammer?

  • @Wiromax3 In a war both countries will use hammer.

  • I want to fly one of those!!!

  • Would be an awesome video if it wasn't all squashed (aspect ratio). Otherwise, nice vid.

  • Russia vs america debate, pretending to know the vehicle like you designed it... Does anybody know what the background music is?

  • Comment removed

  • Indians have ordered 22 A-64D with an option for 22 more. Not to mention C-17 / 130J / P-8 Poseiden. .They will also buy Eurofighter or Rafale. Other than existing projects such as SU 30MKI and PAK-FA [which India financed] it seems India is shifting away from Russia to high tech European and US products.Even tho they are far more expensive than Russian.

  • @jonluc1001 You're comparing chopper and jet planes... India isnt going nowhere, they are great allies with the Russians.

  • @Hatinonthehaters I am not comparing choppers with planes.The point I was making is that India seems to be moving away from Russia in a big way as recent acquistiions prove. Why Eurofighter/Rafale and NOT the Mig35? Why A-64D Appache? Over the coming years there is no doubt USA will become a major supplier even tho Russia and India are great "friends".

  • @jonluc1001 why t-90 ,why su-30, why mi-28, why mig-29k,why talwar class frigades, why brahmos, why pak fa , why akula, why Beriev A-50EI. And who told you that they choose the eurofighter and the rafale instead of the mig-35 .. The mig-35 is still in development . But i am sure that it will suppress it's opponents .

  • @TheKifinas - I was trying to highlight the point that a lot of recent high tech aquisitions have been made from USA, A few years ago this would never have happened.

    It is a well known fact that only the Eurofughter and Rafale remain in contention for the initail MMRCA contract for 126 planes. The Grippen/F18/f16/Mig 35 were eliminated.

    The final decision will be made in the next few months.

  • @jonluc1001 bulllshit .

  • THE AMERICAN ABRAM'S NIGHTMARE :) AS WELL AS INFANTRY.

  • LOL looks like someone got inspired by AH-64 Apache =) ahh american stuff will always be cooler =)

  • @JohanOlsson wtf you talking about? This things looks nothing like apache. The Euro variant is are the copies.

  • RUSSIAN NEVER SURRENDER!!!

  • YOU HAVE AMAZING VIDEOS! 

  • Although Ihave no doubts that it´s pretty capable and deadly, I have to say imho it looks pretty ugly...more like a flying rat and nothing compared to the beautifull Hind! Imagine how badass it would look with a Mi-24 like appearance!

  • @c4blew I agree, but then again, wouldn't a flying rat scare the shits out of you? xD

  • @nonibandoni Not if I have a flying cat! :P

  • @c4blew I call for a flying Dog. I WIN! >:D

  • there are no questions about american technicall superiority but , you cannot only relly on technicall issues, there are the numbers how good can be a apache pilot agaist 4 hind pilots, at the end sheer numbers will win any war, just ask the germans, in both world wars, america in vietnam, thats why india is chosing the russian equipment, because its cheap,rugged and easy to produce..best regards

  • @xeones2345  India can get a US made Apaches, but intenally--those variants that if sold to them are not same advance as what US military has.....

  • @xeones2345 Well, there is one problem with that statement. It'd be basically: Send ten million footsoldiers with sticks and stones against 10 000 armed soldiers carrying M-4's, there is no doubt who'd win that battle really.

  • @nonibandoni of course i understand youre point but the main issue is that, nobody will send an army of stone and sticks against armed rifle men, they will send against 10000 us marines, 1 million russians with a ak-47 each and every soldier so doing the math each american soldier will have to dodge 15000 rounds, thats on a real conflict..and thats what i mean, eventually you have quality over quantity , but i still recognized the technicall advantage of the american military might

  • @xeones2345 Exactly, but my point was only theoretical, in a world where everything made sense and was permitted and no emotions came into play. But yes, your statement is absolutely correct.

  • Хорошая тачка! 555+++

  • I like the way it looks!! :D

  • wats the name of the song ?

  • @Swertzer Cmon man dont ruin the BF reputation, were not like COD fags and post game related comments on real military videos.

  • Really good Helo, like it more then the apache.

  • @Unnsteinsson

    Too bad the rest of the rest of the world doesn't think so... less than 50 of them have been sold world wide. Which usually means there is a fata flaw in the design, or they are too expesnive than the alternatives, or they are not as good as the alternatives...

  • @EvilxMerlin I know that...thats why i said that I liked it more then apache, but overall the Black shark is my fav. helo.

  • @EvilxMerlin: India tested the Mi-28N & the AH-64, the AH-64 was superior in 20 technical aspects.

  • @TankNutJohn89 That's a fucking lie, AH-64 is not superior to MI-28 and it's never happened not in India, nor in anywhere else that AH-64 have technicall superiority, chek 30 Crapachy AH-64 was dead in Afganistan, and around 30 in Iraq, due to technicall problems. REMEMBER in whole 10 years of Soviet Afgan war only around 40 MI24 was shot down, and that's with acrive help of USA, but Crapachyes come down by it's self.

  • @mikeplay007: Of course, even russian experts admitted that. India won't buy the Mi-28 because the Apache was superior in over 20 technical aspects. 30 Apaches which got not shot down, but need to land due technical failure isn't bad as 40 Mi-24 which have no technical failure but got shot down.

  • @TankNutJohn89 Crapachese not shot at all, becouse Russians not helping TERRORISTS like Americans did in Afganistan, and still almost same loses than Sovisets have during 10 years of Afgan war, and you imagine if CRAPACHESE going to be fired with Russian IGLA anti aircraft misiles. And if over 40 CRAPACHY is dead becouse of technical faliour, than it's obviouse that AH-64 is useless CRAP.

  • @mikeplay007: Dude, really? Who delivered Weapons to Vietnam? Iraq? Nearly every Enemy of the United States & NATO does have AK-47's & T-54, or T-72 Tanks. We JUST delivered Stingers to the Taliban, and M4 Rifles to the Georgians, that is all. They aren't dead, cuz technical failure, they just need to be repaired. The Block III is much more reliable than AH-64D.

  • @TankNutJohn89 apache superior to Mi28 ahahahhah go away seriously.

  • @Ouija121085: I like Moron's like you, i've got a report about the Block III yesterday, and i can say: It's clearly superior. Even India & Russia submitted that! Your opinion isn't important to me, you are clearly a russian who thinks the Mi-28 can keep up with a AH-64.

  • @TankNutJohn89 not only that is can keep up... its apache is no match of it. I wont even mention KA50 and KA52..

  • @Ouija121085: Well.. & Serbia will win the Soccer Championship in 2014. The Mi-28N won a competition against the KA-50/52, & the KA-50/52 lost in Turkey against the A129. If the Mi-28N is far better & cheaper why the hell should India buy the Apache? 

  • @TankNutJohn89 Hey, first of all there is no way that Mi28N can beat KA50, KA52 simply DOES NOT HAPPEN! KA50/52 are generation above Mi28N something your failed project Comanche would be in same class with. SO i wont even put KA50/52 in the same basked here preformance of that helicopter are out of this world. Second india buying apaches ? maybe US wants to piss of pakistan for not being sports regarding current Pakistan airspace violations and alleged killing of osama.

  • @Ouija121085: However, the Mi-28N won against the KA-50 back some days. Like i said, Turkey have chosen the A129, and not the all-mighty KA-50. Nobody know what Class the Comanche would be. There are no Apaches in India because they need to be made first. India doesn't need to wait, they would make themselves, like Suchoi T-50.

  • @TankNutJohn89 Isn't Comanche canceled?

  • @BitnikGr: I think so, but we don't know it surely. They don't show us all their equipment, at the Bin Laden Raid in 2011 there was used an Helicopter with Stealth-Technology, which transported the Seal Team Six. It wasn't a attack helicopter but an unknown model developed in 2003, which is probably based on a Black Hawk. Maybe they have a bunch of Combat Ready Comanche too, we can't know it for sure. Im still asking me, who developed this.... DARPA maybe?

  • @TankNutJohn89 "Maybe they have a bunch of Combat Ready Comanche too."

    Possible. Not probable, but still possible. We, indeed, can't know for sure.

  • @BitnikGr: My Words.

  • @TankNutJohn89 The Comanche was fully cancelled some time ago. They did have a few initial production variants, but they are not combat capable.

    Also, the Comanche was made to be a scout helicopter. It was suppose to replace the OH-58A/C/D. Not the Apache, for good reasons too.

  • @Ouija121085 The Apache won a helicopter tender in India. It was an unbiased win.

    But overall, the AH-64D (which India chose) is much more expensive than other competing helicopters.

    I wouldn't say the Ka-50/52 is better than the Mi-28N, especially since they do not have turret mounted guns and their mast mounted sights are not as capable.

    I see little relevance to the US economy and I see no elaboration on your claims too.

  • @TankNutJohn89 and furthermore, america is in deep shit specially military industrial sector due to your economy goin to china thanks to your moronic government and business owners. So apache came in cheaper, when you buy military stuff you will go for the cheaper offer. Appache seems to chosen by indians but yet there are no sales made. Second reason is that Russian army ordered their Mi28N's and they are first on list and india does not want to wait.

  • @TankNutJohn89 Not only keep up, Mi-28 OUTDOES AH-64. What does AH-64 have that Mi-28 doesnt, smart ass. Bring it.

  • @luckyStrike89ru: It can control UAV's, lighter Rotor Blades, & much better Computer Architecture, just ask India, why they bought AH-64 & not Mi-28N. There should be 30 reasons.

  • @TankNutJohn89 Mi-28s can actually control UAVs too. "lighter rotor" blades.... get real man. Ask india? They're backward retards that dont know what they want. Even though they buy most of the tech from Russia, I believe its actually worse. Giving those fuckers high tech weaponry is like giving a monkey a grenade.

  • @luckyStrike89ru: You said the PAK FA, a 5th Generation Fighter isn't High-Tech?

  • @TankNutJohn89 so no comment if you dont like

    its 3th generatio ok go back sleep

  • @mikeplay007 Wow! You are certainly in denial!

    The AH-64 FULLY won in India by 20 counts. You cannot be more wrong. Here is a RUSSIAN article saying so:

    english . pravda . ru/russia/economics/26-10-2011­/119442-india_russia-0/

    Remove the spaces.

    The Mi-28 just needs time to mature. The AH-64D is very advanced by now. The Block III variant can even control UAV's.

    The AH-64D fully won over the Mi-28N. Get over it.

  • @mikeplay007 I like how you lie to make your shitty poorly developed 'conscript' army weapons sound better then properly designed american weapons.

    the AH-64 Fires the hellfires which can penetrate RHA up to 1200mm, which is more armour then what the T-90M packs, it is also more versatile with a faster turn rate and smaller turn radius then both mi-24 and mi-28.

    less then 5 Apaches have been destroyed,

    more su-25's and mi-24's have been destroyed in 1979 afghanistan

  • @Mattc23q You sick, brainwashed cocksucker, chek in wikipedia, or else where, there are over 60-70 of Apaches destroyed in Iraq and Afganistan, of course the cocksucker American military sayes that they were all accidents, but if 60-70 CRAPACHES lost with accidents, that's even worse. On Soviet Afgan war only 300-350 planes were lost, mainly transport hallicopters.

  • @mikeplay007 I have a copy of the Official documents of Aircraft losses in the Afghanistan war and War in Iraq.

    And if Russia lost more vehicles then America thats fucking sad, considering Russia had less vehicles deployed then America.

  • @Mattc23q in Iraq 27 CRAPACHI was lost, in Afganistan around 20 and these loses without anyone helping the Afgans or Iraqies. And during Soviet Afgan war America was helping them, and in 10 years Soviet lost around 300 planes all together, but Soviet Afgan war is only comparable with American Vietnam war, in this war US plane loses are 5000-6000, Americans didn't won any war when Soviets helping other side., Korea, Vietnam, Americans are fucking losers.

  • @mikeplay007 5000-6000 IN VIETNAM? LOL?

    ' that the US Air Force lost aprox 1629 aircraft during the Vietnam war'

    Sec. of Defence.

  • @mikeplay007

    1. Apache has ran x-amount more sorties, so you are going to loose more base on a percentage..

    2. Apaches in Iraq(mostly urban/desert fight) have nothing to do with the Mi-28's in Afghanistan(mountains).

    3&4. go back and read 1. again... = )

  • This probably there best attack chopper. Deadly! these come in your area your in trouble

  • FUCKIN' BEAUTIFUL!

  • 1:03 suprised face

  • i stil like the hind

  • rusi braco davajte

  • Respect to Russians !

  • You dumbass you can't put ejection seats in a chopper.

  • @MrBodiddly86 several ejection systems for helicopters are out there, the rotor blow of first then the pilots eject

  • @MrBodiddly86 You dumbass ALL RUSSIAN modern attack helicopters like Mi-28, KA-50 and KA-52 HAVE ejection seats.

  • @MrBodiddly86 KA-50 have ejection system,idk for mi-28.

  • this thing under the nose of the Mi 28 looks funny like mickey mouse :D or a ghost :D

  • You GOTTA give it to the Russians.... their military spending is only 60 billion.... they pull off some AMAZING shit with that money.

  • @Hatinonthehaters Because it's 4 times cheaper then the same quality american shit =)

  • @Bloodlust20101983 "american shit" son what the fuck are you talking about

  • @Bloodlust20101983 whatever helps you sleep at night....the vast majority of russia's arsenal is very obsolete

  • @FearDivinity Is it really? Most systems just need a little more electronics and they still good. And scince the military reforms to professional military formed of brigades instead of lotz of conscript regiments there don't have to be thousands of armor like it used to be in USSR. The russia's military is on a slow but steady rise in power and datz good.

  • @Hatinonthehaters lol american's have spend over that amount just on their f-22.

  • @Hatinonthehaters It's all smoke and mirrors. Looks good at first glance, but isn't all that great when you get to the nuts and bolts.

  • @Hatinonthehaters They're about to boost it by 500 billion.

  • Comment removed

  • The one scene in CoDMW2 that make me laughing is when you shot down about five Mi-28 with Javelin in front of the White House. In real fight first second you aiming at it, in second it recognizes javelin's targeting laser in third second it rapes you with its machine gun automatically without bothering the pilot=)

  • @konstantin88181 Console players would be stuck here forevah, so they couldn't put it in the game.

  • ehhh it seems ok ill take the KA-50 any day of the week though

  • i prefer more of the ka-50 blackshark than any other attack helicopter

  • I love this music from Mig-29 Fulcrum :)

  • апач говно если его винтовкой сбили ...дальше смешно ..да и янки все жирные ...когда мы начнем вас убивать

  • I want to fkuc to this music.

  • Oh look something the U.S did 20 years ago.

  • @scorp982 apache is 70s technology but this helicopter is 90s technology!

  • A copy is always behind the original. The Apache today is decades ahead in development and battlefield assesment.

  • @stahlwerke So if america is 20 years ahead of china in military technology, how is my country going down fast when china relies on us completely?

  • @stahlwerke a copy also learns from the mistakes of the other model ;-)

  • @Griwa2007 But it always has to follow. Because the original is developing from a leading position. A copy is always a follower. In military terms that is a setback.

  • @stahlwerke 'a copy is always behind the original' nice little fallacy based on wishful thinking right there.

  • LMAO movie maker

  • nobody wants to face this kind of firepower...

  • I'd like to know what kind of heat signature this new Russian toy has. Also air to air capabilities.What kind of countermeasures it deploys in case of a "lock" from ground to air missiles. I'd be thrilled to know if it is equipped with ejection seats.

  • @alboclev It has ejection seats, and a 2 man emergancy comparntment, with a 25 or 30mil nose cannon, 80mm rockets, 64 of them and 8 ATGM's or it can carry AA-11 Air to Air's or Igla's. Or both at the same time.

  • @alboclev Maybe, however KA -50 seems a lot better and very agile. lots of high tech too.I believe that it is a lot more affordable and cheaper than the American counterpart.Comms. and control and weapons systems gotta be digitized though.As of right now I am not aware of Russian combat helicopters being digitized in order to fully enter the new age of warfare. Regardless of this I love it,,,.Pilots survivability is very high and it can deliver a devastating punch. It is a really nice toy,.

  • 0:54 Tom Arnold. lol

  • Здравствуйте товарищи, подскажите исполнителя песни. Очень запал мне этот трек :)

    Заранее благодарен.

  • Comment removed

  • It seems like an Apache on steroids. I like their Ka-50 as much more advanced better.

  • Chuck Norris's daily commuter.

  • They must ET technology like the US. Why else could it be that both these countries have the best aerospace suff and the most destuctive weapons, in spades.

  • super

  • Мы удар осла

  • 1:20 wtf lasers?

  • @MrKittoms... tracer rounds

  • @russiadefence

    hyper laser you dumb

    its called hyper laser and makes muich dmg to all is stand there.

    more than nuke, new hyper laser

  • @russiadefence Russia makes them from ?

  • @MrKittoms wow, theyre tracer rounds fool.

  • @MrKittoms ROFL!! seriously man you need to read up hahahaaahaha!!!!!!

  • @MrKittoms Yeah, you know, the Russians are building imperial walkers to invade your country.

  • @MrKittoms yay, bouncing lazors! .... LOL

  • @MrKittoms super heated phosphorous rounds.

    

  • @MrKittoms

    haha, yes they have lasers. but they are actully called blasters

  • coool helicopter but i think that helmet and vizir are not healthy for eyes xD

  • @vvsector1 What ever, kinder...

  • @vvsector1 I´m not talking about Russia. I couldn´t care less about that garbage pile... I´m talking about children (or childish adults) that argue which attack helicopter is the best, but I´m guessing your reading comprehension isn´t good enough to understand the difference.

  • @swertinge07 you seem like an intelligent individual and yet put yourself on the same level with the very kids u so furiously hate. what garbage pile? people leave there my friend, and if one fucknut insults your national pride is that good enough reason to insult the whole country! hell yeah! lets all do that now! that's how we achieve world peace!

  • @vvsector1 Ohhh, so I guess you are one of the childish know it alls...

  • Lol, I know this helicopter is rly sexy, but seriously. Why did they add that porn music to the background? -_-

  • Would any of our Russian comrades like to tell me what the current plan for Russia's attach helo fleet is?

    Ka-50, Ka-52, Mi-28N, modernized Mi-24s which do you plan to buy? As far as I know the original '80s era Mi-28A lost out out to the Ka-50 but when the Russians wanted the ability for night operations the Mi-28N was deemed superior to the Ka-50N and Ka-52.

  • muzyka vasha amerikanskaya - govno, i voobsche skoro vsey vashey amerike kirdyk.

  • Speaking of Americans, Barack Hussein "Kenyan Kaffir" was NOT BORN IN HAWAII, Let Alone in the USA. Unfortunately, my country is fucked. At least you are happy in Russia because you have a president born in his native land.

  • bfbc 2 :D

  • nice

  • First batch was sent to Chechnya, they where so effective that some chechnyan drug peddlers put a 10 million EURO bounty for a downed mi 28...

    NO losses where reported and the bounty soon disappeared (when that person offering the bounty ironically got killed by the group of MI 28's

    What a fitting end.

  • The first batch went right to Chechnya, not a single loss and a 10 million EURO bounty for any one who can down one, NO CASUALTIES where reported.

  • 2 top comments are in Russian :( so i had to go translate it LOL

  • jeblo sakrili wse amerikosi.ne w kajf?nu tagda sjebalis atsjuda.

  • @erbieone1 LOL... You don't need to know any Russian to get the message! :)

  • че за трек играет?

  • what song is that playing in the background?

  • this is old technology... the Apache has had this tech for over 25 years.

    nothing new.

  • @TheVahnfanel i would love to see russia vs america it would be a white wash for russia unless great britian were involed

  • @ilovepista guy if that hapens were all dead

  • @ilovepista Really, you keep thinking happy thoughts!

  • @TheVahnfanel

    This chopper is of the same year as Apache.

    Moreover, nothing has changed with Apache in these 25 years.

    And Cobra is almost half a century old - it's still in production and flying. So where's the problem?

  • @TheVahnfanel retard Mi28N has a 5th generation fire systems, radar systems, communication, and missile navigation etc... its the best attack helicopter in the world the only one which can rival it is another Russian KA50 aligator or KA52.