Added: 5 years ago
From: vinayakaya
Views: 1,007,760
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,996)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @vetobrz Let's look at Egypt turky 2 countrys that were almost all Christian after Muslims invaded turn all most all Muslim from being forced to convert lol your a fucken lier

  • @vetobrz Please don't tell me about Iran someone in my family married iranian he is a doctore and converted to chiristanty something that would land you in jail or dead in the middle east who are you trying to bullshit personally I don't care if someone is a Muslim but if they don't allow same rights in middle east as we do to Muslims here they should not be comming here

  • @vetobrz wow 25000 in a country of 90million lol Muslims face it Islam us a cult they kill u or jail you if you speak about any other religion or point of view basicly u r brainwashed in to believing what ever they want

  • shuve your therory up arese twat

  • @1slamicLife If u are not allowed to here about any other religion or point of view that is a form of brain washing that is what all cults of in common they don't let there members no about other cultures religions or points of you so basicllly you are a slave to the state and religious leaders sorry but that makes it a cult

  • For the guy that says that Islamic people wont kill a fleeing enemy, you are right and wrong because it's the muslam extremists that think if your not Muslim you are a infidel and you need to die. It's the muslim extremists that killed those people not just everyday Islamic people.

  • @azsutter

    First, don't insult me. Second, let's speak about the video, do you really think it's a Boing 767? Third, less money for who?

  • @1slamicLife If you go to many Arab country's and try to teach about any other point of view or religion they will ether kill you or jail you just like cults do if there members try to leave Islam is a cult

  • @romanljc proselytizing is illegal in saudi. i doubt it's punishable by death. however, one should know to not break the law of the land. And as for apostates, they are divided into three types. Only he who betrays muslims during war by leaving Islam to side with the enemy can be killed.

    For your PM - It was common practice. Even the enemies did not object. Simply because it was the norm at those times.

  • I am really concerned when people in the comment section make really hateful comments re: people and cultures they actually know next to nothing about. Watching the American news networks does not give you anything remotely close to an accurate world view especially when we're talking the middle east.

    @romanljc You mean like Iran, home to 25,000 Jews.

    @StabbyMcButterPants 'Shadow' appears in multiple videos multiple angles.

    @makjac46 Asking questions does not a mental disorder make. -Yoda.

  • @1slamicLife Islam is a cult

  • @romanljc since when do cults invite to good and prohibit evil? Cults are evil and satanic. Just the fact that we continuously ask Allah to protect us from the satan proves Islam is against all forms of evil and transgression. Islam prohibits every action that harms the individual as well as society. Seems you just believe everything you hear. It's time to start thinking for yourself.

  • This is funny. The two side by side images are of a Qantas 767 and a UNITED 767. How can I tell, well, because of the paint schemes circa 2001. Wow, people can be stupid!

  • conspiracy bollocks, it's little sci fi boys wet dream to invent things that are not there.  Go get a life.

  • Looks pretty much like a 767 to me. But then I'm not a howling kook with a skull full of buzzing weirdnesses.

  • Has anyone even remotely considered the possibility that the skin of the fuselage is not there & what is shown is the interior of the cargo area & not lit by the sun?

  • I do admit there may be possibilities of somthing but if that was a military plane where is everyone on those flights i dont thank they came home and the missile i do admit i saw a flash but what if it wasnt a missle i dont know what it was and one more thing why would military planes of ours crash into both world trade centers AND the pentagon and us wage war on a group of muslum extramists (please excuse misspelt words)

  • Not even an engine shadow, looks like undercarriage compartment. It's flatter than the rest of the fuselage and bulging out to the sides, hence the shadow in this lighting angle.

    Jesus, are Americans really this stupid? You "9/11 was an inside job" guys are no different than the garden sprinkler rainbow conspiracy lady.

    Get a life.

  • Just face the facts, planes flown by terrorists hit the world trade center and pentagon! There is no way you can deny this plain and simple. That "extra equipment" is just a shadow! Plus if you owned a multi-million dollar industry would you want to talk about three of your hundred million dollar projects go up in flames and killing hundreds of people! It's a terrorist attack, why do you think we are in this war! Or are our men and women dying because of a myth OPEN YOUR EYES TO REALITY!!'

  • @greenday5499 great, please explain away the 70 plus impossibilities on 9/11, thanks

  • @greenday5499 Open your eyes. You're in denial. Islam condemns terrorism, and no true muslim would kill innocent people when Islam tells us not to even kill a fleeing ENEMY in combat! If we were gonna fly planes into building, why not the white house? Stop letting yourself be brainwashed. It will suck you into ignorance til the end.

    Watch this video. More people than you care to believe know that 9/11 was an inside job.

    Psychologists Explain 911 Denial

  • Extra piece of equipment under the fuselage Visible ? erm Sorry very abstract cant see much to determin , try harder to convince me

  • Oh i'm in the retarded part of You Tube again

  • Yes...This all makes sense: It was a U.S. military plane flown by an Arab suicide air crew! The Muslims were recruited by the Air Force to test out their willingness to fly into a building!!

  • Looks like one plane is painted one color and the other is another color

  • Year 911 retard go to be stupid fucks on earth thousands of people saw them hit the buildings and then there is the radar and all the passengers who got on those planes and just what disappear you whach to much tv

  • Its called a landing gear well. they tend to be square. And if you look at the bottom of a United airlines 767-300ER as pictured, you will notice the grey stripes. its not "equipment". Instead of being a anti government cunt sucking socialist, why dont you go move to Russia or something? Because Im sure no one would miss you.

  • @HDairsoftTV that just shows how lazy and careless Americans are if it wasn't an inside job. This should be done more often.

  • @NinjaAntx This is why we have such up tight air travel now days, it wasnt as layed back as it used to be, are you prepared every day for an atomic shitstorm to hit your house? So why would anybody be expecting this to happen everyday untill now? Same as no one could be preparing for pearl harbor, they didnt expect it to happen, they didnt even know something was wrong untill it was too late, however they were able to find out about flight 93, and it was shot down by an f-16 if not flown down.

  • JACK IDIOTS! THE SOUNDS OF CIVILIAN PLANES ARE MUCH DIFFERENT FROM MILITARY AIR CRAFT,SO THAT ENDS IT ALL!!

  • @Orlandorob1 Well, you are clearly the idiot here. Military 767's use the same fucking engines as a normal Passenger 767.

  • Comment removed

  • what famous documentary movie is this from?

  • @dpwatup Loose Change, that's what its called. There are 3 differnet versions though.

  • Now watch... 9/11 debunked world trade center "plane missiles exposed" from 1.27 on.

    I would say I'm a "truther" but always try to check your facts

  • it was a cruise missle

  • @haributo

    Cruise missiles are far smaller, and don't leave this kind of damage.

  • A shadow ain't a matter of national security lol

  • it is the sun reflecting off the body

  • Extra piece of equipment under the fuselage? Nope... Look at the position of the sun as the light strikes the water tower on the building behind the tower. Light coming from right of screen (east in the morning). Airplane is at 45 degree angle. The dark object is a shadow cast by the engine on the fuselage. The dark object is the same size and shape of the engine. Sorry folks.. Use your heads and open your eyes a bit more.

  • @StabbyMcButterPants Bravo, but whatever you say won't wake up these dickheads! They're braindead, retarded, and in serious need of medical help (mental)

  • Rather funny that C N N was in the right place at the right time to catch this , do you think.Infact the crash was so fast really no media group could have filmed it.Unless??? which i think they did have warning before this event took place.Then this was staged for the media and the rest of the zombie human race.

  • But who really are the drones in this stage act?.

  • Sorry I wasted 27 seconds of my life watching this BS!

  • I can't tell a damn thing by this video...It's just one damn big blur!

  • Hmm the plane looks very dark in color , seems a dark gray?

  • it is a standard 767 just an unusual angle, that "device" is to support the wings of the plane

  • @forresterL11 No it is not, check how UA 175 looks like and then compare it to the hq footage of the drone, it aint the same.

  • @Xendrius trust me look at the united airlines 767... i know there was somone on the inside and wtc 7 had a self destruct.. but that is a UA 767

  • @forresterL11 It is 100% not. Try again.

  • its a standard boing 767 that "device" is on all 767's but it stood out because of the blue and white colour scheme. the mystery is that in 93 wtc bombings the terrorists said they will be back and take down both buildings and how can such a light aircraft devistate tons of concerete and steal. and why did the f-22s not take the second plane down before impact

  • @forresterL11

    This is 2001, the F-22s were not in service until 2005.

    A B-25, far slower and lighter than a 767, plowed through the Concrete Empire State Building, and I mean ALL the way through, an engine came out the other side.

    In estimation, it had 1/40th the force of the 767 crashes. The damage is within expectations.

  • 0:22 They look the same

  • @vengencefrom1979 You're allowed to believe as you wish, but I will not believe these straight up lies. Flight 93 did crash in pennsylvania, 911 was not caused by our gov't, and im done talking baout this wiht all of you conspiricy believing idiots.

  • @Ac1dGoD People did die in the planes, the terrorists claimed that they were going to bring the passengers to an airport for ransom, just like other hijackings in the past, so of course the passangers didnt want to fight back, i wouldnt if we'd get out for money. Also, flight 93, the people did fight back, and they kept the plane from flying to its target destination, the white house.

  • @Devilchild103195 flight 93 as just as full of it as the rest of 9/11. no plane at shanksville, no plane at the pentagon, wtc 7 in freefall, wtc 1 and 2 at freefall speeds, all added up it means 9/11 was an inside job from the start. bush did nothing but cover it up for 7 years. that is obstruction of justice and makes him an accessory to murder after the fact. not to mention a war criminal.

  • THE OFFICIAL VIDEOS ON 9/11 WAS ALL WITH DIGITALL EFFCTS AND OF TERRIBLE QUALITÄT WHY

  • =yuC_4mGTs98&feature=channel_v­ideo_title

  • i coulour disfiguration you bunch of twats look closer

  • Song Name?

    

  • Comment removed

  • type in q33 ny at windows word with wingdings and size 48 u see 2 planes hitting 2 buildings and a skull

    Q33 NY was the number of a plane that hit the wtc

  • @KnewingFun

    Sorry, nothing involved wiuth 9/11 has the number "Q33 NY", so your entire post is BS.

  • @KnewingFun so what is with the star of David? they weren't Jewish.

  • It's obvious Aliens and the Jews planned 911!!!!!!!

  • Stupid video....

  • The comparison looks like just two different paint schemes to me. I don't see the extra hardware... Also, no point in loading plane with bombs, or having said bomb mounted externally.

  • @emaroc

    Lmao, cell phone call from a plane? Its not even possible. There's no reception at a planes altitude.

  • Comment removed

  • @Denierbud11

    You're right that the WTC couldn't be demolished without first removing the asbestos.

    And that''s why it was refused permission to do so at least two times.

    The cost of actually going through and removing the asbestos would have been much higher.

    So insuring the buildings and then blowing them up was good business besides accomplishing a lot of political objectives.

    It's just a new high-tech version of the famous Jewish-Lightning technique .

    Look it up.

  • @Txsray

    See the video "Jewish Lightning Pt. 1" to see what I mean.

  • The biggest conspiracy is the one that feels the government of the U.S. would need to do this to justify going into Afganistan to get Al-Queda, but they are probaly right, as aliens have been running the White House for years, they shape shift to look human but they are not!! Beware! They are here and in control. When did everyone at the asylum get a free pass out? LOL

  • what happened to flight 175 then?

  • @FastUnit4 It got abductucted by aliens. What do you think happenend to it?

  • So if this is the case what happened to all the people that relatives say were on those planes? What about the cell phone calls from the planes?

  • ExtraExtra.truther911.remember­ jfk,the patsy,other shooters that were allowed&then patsy gets blame.same with 911.irans ahmadenejad was key4creating final piece of911puzzle.alquada responds to ahmadenejad saying they get credit,not inside job.urika!for11/2years radiocontrolled demoexplosives r planted in3buildings,jewish owner doubles insurance,israelimosad intell knows alqaeda 3hijacks,US operates allow,missle pentagon,iraqwar,patriot act,6wars now,$falls,10years2truth! RonPaul2012save r USA

  • But I might be 100% wrong on this and you might be 100% correct BoomBoomProductions. Not sure, but one thing I want to know is.......

    If these were military planes then the people on the planes that hit the towers.......WHERE ARE THEY?

  • Plus, I might be wrong here and you can correct me if I am. But didn't that plane just take off? So maybe the landing gear was still down, so it might be the rear landing gear that you think you are seeing. :P

  • Plus, even if there was "an extra piece of equipment" that still doesn't prove it was an inside job. You can't believe everthing you see or read on the net. You should take your own advice buddy, "Research, educate, and then post comments" or in your case videos.

  • Hmm, and that last part "what the underside of a 767 should look like" well that picture was in color the other was black and white. So it will look different. Also boomboomproductions, you say this video has been analized by univiersitys and has been proven to be 3 dimentianal....Well first off, who was doing the analizing? Where they people like you that think they see something anyway or were they people trying to find the truth? In other words unbiase people?

  • Those might have been IFF and ECM compartments...

    IFF is used for warfare where planes that are friend or foe are identified by having a payload container that identify a plane as friend as opposed to not having it and being fair game and ECM is used to jam radar somewhat and other types of things like IR on missiles, so it would be impossible to hit the plane if it was a military plane with our own jets and missiles and we could not track it with any of the ATC.

    Hypothesis based on presentation

  • is usaf fly..the usa make this and go die all americaner !fuck biulderberger fuck illuminati fuck club of rome fu rothshild !

  • such nonsense. as if these 911 masterminds couldnt...and wouldnt simply requesition planes with windows. they knew there are video cameras everywhere...they knew that people are always recording with video cameras,obviously anyone with a brain would simply use regular planes rather than create planes with no windows..or try and pass a missle off as a plane.

    these conspiracy theory people ask you do accept this nonsense but are immediatl;y dismissive of any counter points.

  • LAVON AFFAIR

  • Yup, just a paint job. Like Sukhoi27K said, just google "United 767 Underside" images and you can see it.

  • Its obviously a 3d paint job then that bulges out to one side.

  • More retarded personnel...

  • hmm, just looks like the paint job to me

    911research.wtc7.net/essays/sa­lter/podimages/stripe362107.jp­g

  • Those are the bulges that allow the main gear to fit into the plane. They look profound due to the way sunlight is reflecting off the different shapes of the aircrafts underside. Go buy a plastic model of the 767 and 757, put it together, then look at it.

    People prove real quick the lack of knowledge concerning airplanes.

  • O.K. I'll buy your theory. Now tell me who was the military pilot that committed Hari Kari, where are the missing passengers who were on the original flight, and to where did the original plane vanish?

  • @zalynot i think they can remote controll fly thos things and they prob landed and got payed to live a new life and could of been re painted so its as if it never was found

  • @zalynot Planes can be radio controlled from a pilot at a different location. Search 'operation northwoods' for an explanation as to how planes were switched. As for the passengers, who knows, they may have been disposed of in some way.

    Remember that these are all possible explanation for the events on 911 that have arisen purely because the official reports are insultingly stupid.

  • @suroj

    Please don't send me any more comments about this.

  • @zalynot 1.It was a robot controller built by mythbusters, so no pilot needed. 2. The passangers got 2 millions each and they moved to jamaica. 3. They put the original plane to pieces and shot it to moon with space rockets. Obivious?

  • @Itachi98701 ... 1/ You are a robot controller built by mythbusters, so no pilot (Brain) is needed. 2/ Your Momma & her pimp got 2 millions each & moved to jamaica. 3/ They put your original brain to pieces and shot it to (the) moon with space rockets.

    Obivious...?

    (Oh-Say Can You See, By the Dawn's Early Light...)

  • @Itachi98701 Ever heard of drones you fool? They are using drones in standard warfare, the passengers were killed, the CIA took over the planes with their assets. The original planes were flown to a military base.

  • @Xendrius I want you to reread what you just posted. You honestly believe all of that shit? Here's a theory: 90% of the world hates us!

  • @jemhiggens Not based on wishful thinking, based on evidence. I suggest watching "Mohammed Atta and the flying venice circus" to see that all of the 4 hijackers who were in hte US at the time were CIA/FBI assets, taking orders and paid and supervised by the CIA, not AQ. The rest are still alive in the middle east, some of them never set foot in the US.

  • @Xendrius exactly Xendrius.... their minds are so lazy, they can't figure out what is easily possible with all their black ops high tech as well as the fact that they control the highest positions in the land.

  • @Xendrius are you a kind of movie director ... i, i mean sounds like a new hollywood plot!

  • @1FCKFTW Yea I was part of writing the script for the official story based on my writing skills.

  • @Xendrius And where did they take your brain? Because clearly you've lost your mind.

  • @Xendrius Oh my god how do you sleep at night! To think your own countrymen would do such a horrid act and go that far an that much effort is just insanity! Makes a good film plot tho! Seriously tho.. what of the phone calls made by passangers to loved ones before impact? were they hired actors who trained themselves to sound like people on the planes to make the calls? an then were they shot to keep it all secret!!

  • @EnglishHighsociety They were not fellow countrymen, they don't see them as americans or belonging to any race or country, they are luciferian bloodlines who control the shadow government in America. The calls were 100% faked, cell phonecalls didn't work at those heights and there were no seatphones on flight 93 yet most of the calls came from there.

    None of the 19 "hijackers" are linked to any muslim groups or AQ, all of the missing ones linked to CIA, rest alive.

  • @Xendrius How could they be faked? How could a family member not recognise there own relatives voice on a phone? I ahve heard the calls and iv seen the interviews with the family memebers who recieved the calls and the recorded calls. The one was from a man who was helping the others break down the cockpit door. That plane crashed in a field.

  • @EnglishHighsociety Easy, even in early 2000 they tested the voice morphing tech on politicans and had a famous politicians voice faked, an entire speech, it fooled everyone who knew him. David Ray Griffin goes into that in one of his lectures.

  • @Xendrius So they killed the origian passangers then made fake calls,lost 4 planes,killed 3000 fellow americans, spent billions plottin it then billions reparing damages and lives then went to war spending more billions an more lives for what?

  • @EnglishHighsociety Yes to everything, their goal is to bankrupt the American government, and then take the world economy down with it, their goal is to make peoples lifes miserable as they plan to create world war 3, and then they will have a plan in store to usurp world domination by either faking a ET presence that has come to help us or by other means.

    This is in the 25 Illuminati goals from the Rothschilds plans in 1776, the same Rothshcilds who control todays US central bank.

  • @Xendrius

    However, they can't fake personal knowledge, they shared memories, safety deposit box numbers, even MANNERISMS only the real people were capable of.

    And it's one thing to fake a random statement, it's quite another to fake an intimate conversation, the two are not equivalent.

    And you know what technology was NOT perfected in 2001?

    Two things, remote aircraft, and "super themite", BOTH are STILL experimental in fact.

  • @Alaskaslim Don't bother trying to explain anything to a conspiracy theorist. I'm coming to the conclusion that these people have something physically different in their brains which either prevent logical thought or cause them to believe everything they see on YouTube.

    .

  • @Xendrius

    Cell phones COULD work at those heights, but calls tended to last less than a minute.

    United 93 DID have seat phones, United Airlines itself confirms this, and the phone records of those calls are recorded and billed to THEM.

    Do you want me to pull out the record? It's definitive evidence.

  • @Itachi98701--hey mouth breather. A *DRONE* could fit inside your living room. Drones are not that large because they are mean to find INTELLIGENCE, so they are small, "fly under the radar"---the downed Drone Iran claims to have of ours could fit on a table....Drones did not fly into the WTC...sorry,...

  • @Daikokuten777 Are you stupid? They can make a drone out of anything, are you saying there are no 767 planes that could be flown by remote? Hit your head against the wall 2 billion times till you get some common sense.

  • @Xendrius People like you scare me. This has to be the dumbest shit I've read so far. Congratulations.

  • @CerebrumPedere Intellectual and well researched things scare ignorant sheep like you.

  • @Xendrius You calling me ignorant after you put out a theory like that? Ok genius.

  • @CerebrumPedere Ignorance is not knowing, so yes you are ignorant, you have no idea what's going on, for the past 3 years I have digged up so many interviews and recently released footage and I have watched the relevant documentaries. Clearly you have not, for starters, maybe watch the first video about the dozens of witnesses who said the plane was a grey military plane that struck the second tower.

    I got the video footage, the witnesses, what do you have?

  • @Xendrius Those pods are paint. I mean for HEAVENS SAKES he compares two different planes....yes same model, but different airlines. You are the sheep my friend...to ignorant to look at facts that don't match your theory.

  • @lovesthecity3 Are you stupid? Go check how UA flight 175 looks like underneath. I have done extensive analasys and research on this.

  • @Xendrius ok, you use YouTube for research - FAIL You say government hijacked planes so they could murder everyone on them at a military base just so they could fly a drone into the WTC - FAIL. You say I am ignorant along with everyone else that calls you out on this bullshit - FAIL You want to use YouTube as a research tool, then read all the comments and try to be objective because you - FAIL

  • @GT500Shelby07 I have the footage on my channel, no need for me to try to talk sense into you, you obviously have no clue on the subject.

  • @GT500Shelby07 "use youtube for research", are you stupid? Where did you get all of your info from? Where did you verify all the claims by the media on the day of 9/11?

    I have gone through dozens of gigs of newly released FOIA material aswell as scoured the web for all released interviews from fireifghters and first responders. The interviews from the survivors that you NEVER HEARD.

  • @Xendrius Yes I know what it looks like. I also know what the underside paint job looks like. Searhc This on google images... "Underside of boeing 767 united" It matches perfectly with what you see here.

  • @lovesthecity3 I know how it looks like genius, the plane that was used was a 767, like any 767, except the plane that hit the towers had something extra attached to it, it was likely a "reciever", an antenna to recieve instructions, all drones have some sort of extra bulge or external equipment attached.

  • @Xendrius That something extra was just paint. 

  • @zalynot there was no one on those planes. They were remote control flown into the towers through a camera mounted over the piolet seat. The story that people died is hogwashed balderdash.

  • @Ac1DGoD You have no respect for the victems. They always compare the belly to an unpainted 767, not United one. Please see this link for a comparison:

    watch?v=5j_c1tPMiG0

    Skip to 1:28 to see the comparison of the plane to a UA 767

  • @PostalCode74 don't need to have respect for people I don't know and didn't die. I have no respect for those telling us people died in the planes and those who went along with that story. People died in the towers, but not in the planes. I don't buy for a second 2 planes full of people both GREATLY out numbering the sand niggers and BOTH not doing a dam thing while knowing what sand niggers do. I have bought BS before, but im not that gullible.

  • @zalynot aliens... no jk but possibly assassinated by the gov.?

  • @zalynot you ever heard of a predator drone, how does a guy in ohio bomb someone in yemen, that technology is there, did you see the passengers get on the flight, know any of their familys personally? Check the flight schedule? No right but more than 20 people who did see discrepancies, committed suicide were poisoned and died in crashes look that up THEIR deaths were REAL

  • dumb ass

  • dumbass

  • The two planes look identical to me. What's being pointed out are just lighting and resolution differences. Besides, what would be the point of adding something to the outside of the plane? That makes no sense. You could just put it in the cargo bay, right?

  • why is all footage always blury can't we ever get a clear one that can actually mean something

  • Youtube- Misterious Death of 9/11 witnesses- Don´t let the pricks fool you folks expose them all!

  • Wake up America...Obama is about to declare marshall law and become dictator for 15 years.Impeach him now!!

  • I remember that when the Petagon was hit there was a live report on the radio from an eye witness who was driving along the highway and saw the plane up and close and said it was a pilotless drone!!

  • They are missle pods,I helped install them.I worked for Lockheed a year before 911 and was supposed to install the a/c system in two 707's.There was no manual available but was told to put it together as best as I could,and not to worry cuz these planes were only going to fly one more flight.The windows were painted over,a 707 is a twin engine cargo jumbo jet.We also installed missle pods on the belly.

  • ?????

  • This video is an INSIDE JOB.

  • Yes because a shitty flip camera can pick up high detail at 450 MPH.

  • @psiewert83 LMAO

  • @INSONIASXPOWER Blocked.

  • 9/11 attacks were not by OBL or others. Rather it was conspiracy by Americans to invade Iraq, Afghanistan Pakistan n Iran n other Muslim countries. Pls watch video titled"Mysterious Deaths of 9/11 Witness" at:

    youtube.com/watch?v=bvay28lZiH­U&feature=player_embedded#%21

    Mind killing their own man(American) for greater cause is just normal. For ex. wanted to kill gen. Zia of Pakistan, killed US ambassador Raphel & 2 US generals with him in mys. air crash on 17th aug1988 in Pakistan

  • If you'll watch carefully from about .8 to .12 whatever it is emits a flash when it hits the building. Maybe it's landing gear related, maybe not.

  • I agree that the official story is bogus, but this video is disinformation. The plane ABSOLUTELY a 767. Furthermore, the "extra equipment" is nothing more than a ventral, painted stripe. Standard paint scheme for UA at that time. Just google United 767 Underside...

  • @Sukhoi27K That is not what is in question. Right wing, left of engine. This object casts it's own shadow.

  • Comment removed

  • @Sukhoi27K What about the absence of windows on the jet that crashed into the tower?

  • @OmegaWolf747 Send me a link to a video where you can CLEARLY see no windows on the plane. I haven't seen one yet. You can't make out individual windows in the towers, either, in any of the videos. It's an issue of video quality and the angles of the shots. And look at any other 767 in flight--the windows are TINY!!

  • @belowthepovertyline Well, I'll admit there are no videos that actually show the absence of windows, but there were plenty of eyewitness reports stating this.

    watch?v=jRC4lCQuBmc

    watch?v=mq7ZYeKuQcE

    watch?v=VVoU0f9gtlE

  • @OmegaWolf747 In those videos, there are a total of 3 witnesses. One was an hysterical woman who said it wasn't a passenger plane, one was a guy who said, "It wasn't no airliner or anything, it was a twin engine, big gray plane." The other guy was a Fox reporter who was in Brooklyn when he saw the 2nd plane. IN BROOKLYN.

    It was total chaos that day, people make mistakes, say wrong things. "No windows" is just a silly proposition.

  • @OmegaWolf747 You mean the witnesses from the ground that didn't see windows on the underside of the plane? Or are you referring to the witnesses who weren't there that heard an audio feed recorded a minute after it crashed when no one knew what was going on?

  • @dcook112475 Just the witnesses mentioned in the videos.

  • @Sukhoi27K Good Call. I wish I could hit the like button for every time I had to watch a video of someone calling that striped a bomb or some other dumb shit. peace!

  • @Sukhoi27K well i hav but this 767 aint simetrical (excuse my spelling). also watch world trade center by pilots for 911 truth. they found out that it could not hav been a normal 767

  • @Sukhoi27K no it wasn't a 767, (maybe it was at one point but then it got converted to a cargo plane, with explosives on the tip, watch closely at any videos of second plane hitting, you see an explosion just as the tip of the plane hits, why? no other part of the plane (except for engines which i can understand would explode due to debris flying through) cause sparks or explosions, just the tip

  • @sh9683

    Why would you want to put a tiny amount of explosive in the nose or under a plane that can carry tons of exposives internally?