Boeing 767-200 from Continental Airlines at Zurich-Kloten by Sven Woodtly

[airbus343X]

The 767-200 is sooo short but really wide ;)

[mathai11]

it kinda looks like a large b737.

[SAMCAMJAIK1]

@mathai11 I know RIGHT!

[westernpack99]

Delta3359 is right---->ER

[Avion3333]

@westernpack99 how do u know its an ER? (hoping ur gonna tell me the difference between the two)

[westernpack99]

@Avion3333. Continental Airlines only uses 767 200 E.R's 10 I believe are in service. The E.R Version has better performance Higher takeoff weight and distance by about 2000 N.M.I----->>> Nautical Miles further than the 200. The L.R are even better but The 767's don't have L.R. Look up Continental Airlines on Wiki

[aviationfreak100]

@westernpack99 Continental (or United now) has both 767-200 & 767-400, ER's all of them...

[westernpack99]

@aviationfreak100.

So continental and united both have 767-200 and 767-200er?. Wiki says only 200er in continental airlines. I new continental had 767-400er and with their merger united might use 767-400 down the line. I could be wrong though

[aviationfreak100]

@westernpack99 I meant say they only have the ER' series in the 200 and 400's versions...

[aviationfreak100]

@westernpack99 the plain non ER version never sold well and remember the 767-200ER was the pioneer in the log haul twin routes...

[westernpack99]

@aviationfreak100

Didn't know that the 200 series didn't sell well. But yes it was a pioneer. and still and great jet.

thanks for the knowledge.

[Furdah]

@ifee364 i agree it is not a 737.. It is pretty clear

it doesnt have a dorsal fin and also the 737 doenst look quite like the 767.

[ecrdab747]

LOL ! The pilot behaves as if nothing has happened !

[jz09hen]

almost overshoot!

[rflx21]

now way, he just used about half of the rwy! Due to the inbound traffic the aircraft left the rwy as soon as possible and to proceed fast to the gate @ terminal e. (visibile in the background.)

[bibi3778]

nice video CO79

[MooseheadDrinker]

wow so exciting that i got a boner!

[racsito39]

The reverse thruster were activated until the very end of the landing process.

[rflx21]

Thats RWY 28 at ZRH. As far as i know its only 2500 Meters long. And if you look at the weather condition that day with a wet RWY i guess they wanted to slow the aircraft down quite fast. You see that frequently when aircraft land on that perticular RWY.

[musicman5454]

is some one clapping

[malmo66]

no it is the rain.

[hunta21]

Clearly a 762... the 764 is way longer

[delta3359]

Wrong, its a B767-200ER

[awsomeman32179]

@delta3359 omg give it a break it not a big difference !!!!!

[garciajl20]

Definitely a 767-400...its the plane I fly twice a week to either madrid brussels or brazil since I fly for Conti

[mhcblues22]

too short to be a 764.

[AA777200ER]

767-200

[garciajl20]

thats a 767-400