And now, looking at the Violet Blue blog post I linked to above, as well as twitter(dot)com/porn_harms , we see that DianaBoston has involved herself. Figures. That this radical-socialist-lesbian-separatist-or-whatever is now carrying water for someone from the Family Research Council is an irony not lost on me.
Thanks for getting the message out there iamcuriousblue! Of course I agree that actually porn should be out of the reach of children, but if what I am seeing is the correct 'justifications', then there are plenty of easier ways for children to access it. This unfortunately does appear to be sour grapes.
And as it turns out, this "objectionable" link in question was a spam message! I find the whole idea of taking sites down for what they link to, much less if they link to a site that links to a site, to be pretty fucking weak to put it mildly. (Uh oh, I said a bad word!)
The link in the first facebook post found in the first link of google caches provided in your description is to pornographic images. There are no age requirements, no way of stopping a young child from clicking on that and being forced to see porn. We did not report your page, but are very happy that such easy access to porn has been restricted by Facebook.
First, I'm not able to find the link that you've described.
Second, you're saying that if somebody can trace a chain of links back to a page with adult content, that should be enough for a page to be flagged down? So how about when Gail Dines mentions Gagfactor(dot)com? All one has to do is put that into the address bar and you've linked to some very extreme imagery.
Once again, this was a bad faith attack on a site solely because you disagreed with the political content of the site in question. What you advocate is disgusting and deeply unethical, and I think you should be very ashamed of yourselves.
Also, I don't appreciate the thinly-veiled threat you make regarding my supposed chain of links to adult content. Do you really want to play that way? I can certainly find *plenty* of such link chains at anti-porn sites, and graphic descriptions through people like Gail Dines. You *do not* want to open this Pandora's Box.
@PornHarms Indeed anti-porn activists on youtube often discuss sites they find offensive and it's very easy to type in the website mentioned and find the site itself. I did this today, in fact. This is a reach and you are proud to support censorship of ideas. I noticed your tweet of celebration. You are celebrating the false flagging of a page that did not contain porn and this is extremely low and not tolerated in this community here on youtube. Respond please.
Political speech is no reason to take down a FB page. AntiPornographyBlog was one of the first people I encountered in this area of discussion. Not happy. They are pro censorship. For sure. I assume the group was not private.
This has happened to a few other people and orgs I know of. Now I know a bit more about the specifics. Thanks.
I really REALLY wish I could get over what the bitch (yes bitch) did to the REAL Violet Blue. (How she took her money and left her and kids damn near penniless). If it was anyone else who made that group and it got flagged I would most definitely rally behind them. But, no, not that fucking impostor (I refuse to refer to her as Violet Blue).
I just found out today that BBW porn star April Flores, aka Fatty D had her Facebook group taken down.
Fuckers.
iamcuriousblue 1 year ago
And now, looking at the Violet Blue blog post I linked to above, as well as twitter(dot)com/porn_harms , we see that DianaBoston has involved herself. Figures. That this radical-socialist-lesbian-separatist-or-whatever is now carrying water for someone from the Family Research Council is an irony not lost on me.
iamcuriousblue 1 year ago
H/T to Suzanne Forbes @CarnalNation for the shoutout!
iamcuriousblue 1 year ago
Thanks for getting the message out there iamcuriousblue! Of course I agree that actually porn should be out of the reach of children, but if what I am seeing is the correct 'justifications', then there are plenty of easier ways for children to access it. This unfortunately does appear to be sour grapes.
YeOldeHeretic 1 year ago
@YeOldeHeretic *actual that is.
YeOldeHeretic 1 year ago
@YeOldeHeretic
And as it turns out, this "objectionable" link in question was a spam message! I find the whole idea of taking sites down for what they link to, much less if they link to a site that links to a site, to be pretty fucking weak to put it mildly. (Uh oh, I said a bad word!)
iamcuriousblue 1 year ago
The link in the first facebook post found in the first link of google caches provided in your description is to pornographic images. There are no age requirements, no way of stopping a young child from clicking on that and being forced to see porn. We did not report your page, but are very happy that such easy access to porn has been restricted by Facebook.
PornHarms 1 year ago
@PornHarms
First, I'm not able to find the link that you've described.
Second, you're saying that if somebody can trace a chain of links back to a page with adult content, that should be enough for a page to be flagged down? So how about when Gail Dines mentions Gagfactor(dot)com? All one has to do is put that into the address bar and you've linked to some very extreme imagery.
(cont)
iamcuriousblue 1 year ago
@PornHarms
Once again, this was a bad faith attack on a site solely because you disagreed with the political content of the site in question. What you advocate is disgusting and deeply unethical, and I think you should be very ashamed of yourselves.
(cont)
iamcuriousblue 1 year ago
@PornHarms
Also, I don't appreciate the thinly-veiled threat you make regarding my supposed chain of links to adult content. Do you really want to play that way? I can certainly find *plenty* of such link chains at anti-porn sites, and graphic descriptions through people like Gail Dines. You *do not* want to open this Pandora's Box.
iamcuriousblue 1 year ago
@PornHarms
This is the best you can do? Mechanical repetition of the same post?
Is there a human being under there?
iamcuriousblue 1 year ago
@iamcuriousblue
Well, looks like that was taken down. This is proving interesting.
iamcuriousblue 1 year ago
@iamcuriousblue What was taken down iamcuriousblue?
xxxild 1 year ago
@xxxild Was something else taken down or just Our Porn Ourselves so far.
xxxild 1 year ago
@xxxild
As a response to my response to PornHarms initial post, PornHarms left three identical copies of their original post.
I guess this is what happens when you talk to a robot.
iamcuriousblue 1 year ago
@iamcuriousblue That's truly sad. They censor the very people or person running the youtube channel.
xxxild 1 year ago
@PornHarms Indeed anti-porn activists on youtube often discuss sites they find offensive and it's very easy to type in the website mentioned and find the site itself. I did this today, in fact. This is a reach and you are proud to support censorship of ideas. I noticed your tweet of celebration. You are celebrating the false flagging of a page that did not contain porn and this is extremely low and not tolerated in this community here on youtube. Respond please.
xxxild 1 year ago
Xtra awesome. :)
FeministWhore 1 year ago
I hope the radical feminists don't try to justify this one.
CyberHangman 1 year ago
I've been trawling through pornharm.com and I've dicovered Judith Reisman' 'erototoxin' theory. lulz
yeahwotevaman 1 year ago
@ReignbowSmite pornharms is also on youtube.
xxxild 1 year ago
@variablast pornharms is also on youtube.
xxxild 1 year ago
FUCKING HELL!
Divinity33372 1 year ago
Political speech is no reason to take down a FB page. AntiPornographyBlog was one of the first people I encountered in this area of discussion. Not happy. They are pro censorship. For sure. I assume the group was not private.
This has happened to a few other people and orgs I know of. Now I know a bit more about the specifics. Thanks.
alowlyapprentice 1 year ago
Check out the links people.
xxxild 1 year ago
I really REALLY wish I could get over what the bitch (yes bitch) did to the REAL Violet Blue. (How she took her money and left her and kids damn near penniless). If it was anyone else who made that group and it got flagged I would most definitely rally behind them. But, no, not that fucking impostor (I refuse to refer to her as Violet Blue).
ThatLeoRAWR 1 year ago