@ammachi3, hmm, finding the last piece to a equation that with out fail can answer any question.... Thus allowing absolute foreknowledge of outcomes for every experiment, is totally useless. Being able to eliminate trials of dead end methods, pointless, along with how worthless it will to be able to save all our effort and resources for the stuff we know can work..... Totally agree. You should write a book. You seem to out smart thousands of particle physicists, and even kaku, cox, hawking to n
pure genius, and to those who think this is a pointless science, get real! no science is pointless!! if you want to have a go at cost etc just look at the military spend of the world...what a waste that is
pure genius, and to those who think this is a pointless science, get real! no science is pointless!! if you want to have a go at cost etc just look at the military spend of the world...what a waste that is
pure genius, and to those who think this is a pointless science, get real! no science is pointless!! if you want to have a go at cost etc just look at the military spend of the world...what a waste that is
Come on people, get real. This is just a stupid science people’s ego trip. It has nothing to offer us practically that can alleviate the ills of our world. Thus, it is an obviously morally repulsive waste of money, time & energy. Imagine what could have been achieved if those 10,000 scientists, set their collective minds to mitigating climate change, or creating new energy sources/infrastructure? In short, they should have done something that actually mattered.
@ammachi3 they all study all those things with that, to know all those wether problems go first to the fundamentals,, what we are really made of,, all this these things around us.. 100 years ago germs is just a theory,, but now we all know thers just morte than just bacteria, we all know the atom.. hard to explain in text.. we need this project.. its vital for their study...
@UrgentUrge I was not knocking all of science. I was saying that the LHC is a waste of time, energy & money. Which it is. We could have put the money into creating alternatives energy sources to fossil fuels or better health care.
@UrgentUrge This smashing of particles business is just a big kid’s fantasy that has no real significance. So what if they find the Higgs Boson. Wopty f**king doooo….what has that changed? Absolutely nothing…that’s what. There will still be the same amount of pain and suffering in the world, probably more because we choose to spend money on this instead of other things. That is the truth, my friend.
Considering the cost of the war in iraq is like a thousand times more expensive, you can go suck it. Knowledge is the tool we use to solve the worlds problems, no matter how obscure it might seem to you.
Oh yeah this is just the greatest thing eve...I bet it will spontaneously solve world hunger and poverty when they find the Higgs Boson...and it will magical suck up all the atmospheric CO2 so that we don’t boil our planet...oh oh...I bet it will give us unlimited energy so that we don’t have to worry about peak oil...oh and it surely will solve the economic collapse that is underway. No I hear you say...Why not? Ohhh...that’s right, because this is a pointless waste of time, energy and money.
My thought is where did all that stufff in the beginning come from.... If nothing existed then then where dud all the matter cone from.... I am try to see the atheist and agnostic point of view on the creation
A likely story... The ones of us who aren't going to hell know the universe was created in 6 days by god... Can't really explain how, but you know it happened because the bible said it, and you know the bibles right because it's gods word, and you know god exists because the bible says it, and you know the bible's right because god said it...
To "find" that which is supposedly omnipresent, at the rate of just once in 2x10^16 events, and at 2-3 sigma at that, is wishful thinking, at best. But it is never going to be enough for particle physicists. When they fail this time (and fail they will -- mass is a concept without absolute definition, just as time and space-time are), their military sponsors will provide even more taxpayers' trillions...
To "find" that which is supposedly omnipresent, at the rate of just once in 2x10^16 events, and at 2-3 sigma at that, is wishful thinking, at best. But it is never going to be enough for particle physicists. When they fail this time (and fail they will -- mass is a concept without absolute definition, just as time and space-time are), their military sponsors will provide even more taxpayers' trillions...
@happyhanieh he said "as one of my great hero's, Carl Sagen said, these are the things, and actually not only these, but I was looking around, these are the things, like Saturn 5 rockets and Sputnik and DNA and literature and science, these are the things that hydrogen atoms do when given 13.7 billion years"
The dust of subatomic particles resulted after the collisions in LHC are particles of ethereal matter, even that the physicists give not them permission of existence! The electrical discharge to one Tesla coil was made and in a basin with water. Great was the surprise that the electrical discharge of the particles of electrical ether in water has the same ARBORESCENT SHAPE - proving the existence, and in water of the primary ethereal gravitational field.
From 1967 I analyse with attention all published experiments concerning the accelerators of particles and the controlled thermonuclear fusion, moreover and the scriptural and paleoastronautical information. I had made only a logical and rational synthesis of the applied science, therefore my brothers- you block not the your sites and my computer. Please you to support me, how long, I still can produce such information.
Now, were collided particles in LHC and you seen that is nothimg: none Higgs boson, none Big-Bang, neither black holes, but only thousands of shards of ethereal particles.Therefore, now -return you physicists from your distraction at Isaac Newton with his universal attraction law= THE UNIFIED LAW OF THE MATTERS AND FORCES, at the eliminated ETHER by Einstein, at the unseen world of the ethereal and spiritual matters which fill up the Cosmos, and return you at the Lord- at God!
The physicists show that about the discovery the Higgs boson it desire and the discovery the origins of the bodies'mass; the discovery the dark matter, the discovery the superior dimensions and the demonstration of the superposition. But as a result to the collisions of particles- the black holes had appeared not, the Big-Bang had appeared not demonstrating that the Large Hadron Collider bring not about us the Apocalipse.
It say: with the exception of the Higgs boson all the predicted particles of Standard Model were detected and the them properties were measured with precision. The Standard Model of particles to arrived let be verified, but, if the Higgs boson is not finded, then the Standard Model and the others models will be necessary to be reconstruct from zero.
In 1964 physicist Peter Higgs has thinked existence to one energetic field which penetrate whole Universe, and named it "Higgs field" and his particles named "Higgs boson"and that these can give mass the subatomic particles.Thus appear the necessity as in the CERN-frame let it construct an accelerator more big: the LARGE HADRON COLLIDER,which made the first collisions of particles in 14 December 2009, afterwards in 2010, in 2011 and they uncovered not the Higgs boson particles
The movement of the celestial bodies in Cosmos demonstrates that these it can not maintain in the existent formation if not would exist and another matter which let complete and fill up the Cosmos. And this unknown matter, which is the eliminated ETHER- they named she: dark matter and dark energy, which is in proportion of 96% from the Cosmos's mass.
Already the protons, neutrons and electrons are formed through condensation and concentration of the etehreal particles. But how the ETHER has eliminated from physics, the physicists had invented the Standard Model of the particles and them forces excluding the gravity. Thus for to comprise and the gravity with her particles and forces they had invented and the strings theory.
The materials seem to be complicated and irregular at the sight with the free eye. But at microscope they it show simple and orderly. All the material shapes: animal. vegetal and mineral are made from atoms and these only from three constituents: protons, neutrons and electrons. The photon of light we see it and the photon of heat we feel it, but the ethereal particles are more small, of a few thousands time; we see not them now, but the our spirits see them.
If in 1905 Einstein excludes the ETHER from physics, viz excludes the intergalactic matter, then the his disciples arrive with the relativity theory at Big-Bang, at black holes, holes of worm, at singularity and today at travel in time. Thus the great explosion of George Gamov and his fellows R.A.Ipher and R.C.Hermann, become cosmological standardized theory which is one great bluff!
Between 1930...1935 the discord was photon of light.The opinion of physicists had not adopted existence in flight to photon, and photon remain without mass. If photon has not mass, he cannot interact with nothing on trajectory and the light speed remain constant lengthways the trajectory. Thus, in place let to consider that the photons lose themselves the speed on way as result the them interaction with the intergalactic matter, they had set the Universe let it dilate entirely
Today in front of our eyes and of the observation apparatuses it succedes all evolution phases of the celestial bodies, stars and galaxies. An evidence that the Universe doesn't seems to have an explosive beginning and doesn't seems to have ever an end in the his entirely. The facts demonstrates that in Universe the cyclical creation has place continuously in certain parts, and can has not place total creation in the same time in all the mass of the Universe.
As early as the time of Michael Faraday at scientific problems in contradiction, academical circles decided victory the some or another.In this optics of domination of certain conceptions: philosophical, theological and of other principles, in science had penetrated mistaken and fallacious theories, and the impossibility of immediate verification, to leaded at the creation others abstractings which had blocked the road of the scientific innovation with practical applications.
Today, on measure that the theory advances from classic mechanics to the quantum mechanics the particle and the wave are gradual dematerialize. The modern physics is blocked by enunciation of some laws and mistaken principles as: relativity theory, Hubble's law, postulation that the atom can't emit and absorb radiations continously, admitting the postulate what claims the photons without mass a.s.o. These guide- us at supernatural and at the technical and technological blocage
Nikola Tesla argued that:" I hold that the space cannot be curved, for the simple reason that it can has not properties. Of properties it can speak only when it work with the matter which fill up the space. The empty space it can not curve because- something- can not action about -nothing". This relativity proceed from a philosophical direction, on which A.Einstein produce her when he was found in a state of technical and religious confusion.
Einstein ignore and vex over 100 of men of science which had signed a petition in which they upholded that the his relativity theory is wrongly. It renounce at the absolute space and absolute time, it arrive at the Lorentz-Einstein's transformations through the introduction to two factors- subunitary and superunitary what lead at the infinte mass phantoms, at the infinte energy phantoms and at the infinte impuls phantoms when a body or particle would touch the light speed.
As a result of the wrong interpretation of the Michelsom-Morley(1881)'s experiments which had demonstrated that the ETHER is entirely trained with the mass and the Earth's atmosphere, in 1905 A.Einstein renounced at the ether notion, at absolute space and set the relativist mecanics' base. He emits the two restricted relativity principles through which excludes the Ether, impose as limit of bodies' movement -the light speed and denatured completely the classic dynamics reality
Thus, the primary gravitational field it manifest as a solid body for the electrical ether and the electromagnetic phenomenons, and in the same time it manifest as a fluid body for the ethereal concentrated bodies and for the chemical bodies. We perceive the secondary gravitational field among the astral bodies. and in the electrical unloading's case which are ARBORESCENT we perceive and the primary gravitational field of the primary electrogenic particles.
But celestial sources say us that whole Cosmos is filled with a dense powder of alive ethereal and electrogenic particles, and among they are streams of particles and more small because gravitational primary attraction among they, constituting primary gravitational field.But more exist,in the same space and secundary gravitational field produced by the ethereal concentrated particles in the ethereal bodies and in the chemical bodies which are neutral from electrical viewpoint.
With much before Einstein, J.C.Maxwell starts from a mental experience, says that he generalize the Faraday's Electric Induction law and exclaims that the transmited wave would be a successive creation of magnetic fields and electric fields perpendicular between them and on the propagation direction. Since then it preachs the transmission of the electromagnetic wave at thousands kilometres without material suport.
Leibnitz(1646...1716) German scientist, forerunner of the mathematical logic, through the denial the newtonian space- time is and he a forerunner of the Einstein's relativity. Einstein considers the gravity as a property of the space and not in the least as a property of the matter which fill up this space. The Einstein's relativity is a geometrization of the space.
In the century XIX, the new scholars: Coulomb, Laplace, Ampere, Poisson, Green, Gauss, Webwer etc., had holded the action's theory at distance without material support, and they support only the mathematical abstracted theories. The science already started let it cover more much with the theory than with the practice.
The theory without logic and reason is and remain an non-reality.The science is at beginning a theory, but has logic and reason and become true after the her practical realisation.The space it stretch in Infinite and the time come from Infinite and it stretch in Infinite marking the reality of the ours material world seen and unseen.The faithless man believe not that exist the God with the our world seen and unseen and then this man can not think and judge with real elements.
A.Einstein through the his relativity to REVERSED the reality of the our terresterial world. He remove the ETHER from physics and give materiality the space and the time. But the SPACE limit the place where it can unfolding material actions and the TIME mark the period of unfolding to some material actions. The space and the time are only ABSTRACT notions, absolute and colateral which show where and when it unfolding certain material actions.
The theorist physicist omit to study the science's history as let understand the things and phenomenons, but they learn only the exposed theory for to obtain a diploma, afterwards they twitter. We must let understand the science and how it was builded. Einstein has and good parts, but those mistaken are catastrophic. But Einstein was not single in the supporting the mistakes.
The theoretical mistakes from centuries XIX and XX, had been amplified and had passed noisily in century XXI. Many experiments and terrestrial and extraterrestrial observations was wrongly interpreted because theoretical physics indoctrinated with Einstein's relativity.Thus was started the investigation of subatomic particles without ethereal matters and was started the building of the ITER without to know the electrical ether and his role in the working of the magnetic trap
The heavenly embodied world together with the heavenly unembodied world or free spirits- they had created and spreated- us on all the Earth surface, they had mixed- us and raised ones against another; they created us at a certain moment certain problems on which we must solve for can exist as terrestrial embodied beings, for gain our experience and our world personality.
Wouldn't it be marvellous if this video could be shown once a year in all churches, chapels or mosques to replace the standard religious message. It really puts in perspective the bronze age folk tales that underpin the great world religions.
I think the fact that he's gorgeous might just be a coincidence - what grips me when Brian Cox talks that isn't necessarily there with others is his enthusiasm and how clearly you can see how much he loves it all. It's adorable and it's really very inspiring.
@FunkyMonkeyJunkie302 Brian is not 'that' gorgeous! OK so my 15 yo female cousin thinks he's gorgeous, but I'm male and 37 and i don't find him the least bit gorgeous.... I think he needs a haircut!
So perhaps Brian's gorgeousness is subjective, and limited to teenage girls ???
@grinblurnar Surely, all gorgeousness is subjective (for the record, I know adults who quite fancy him... ha ha)? But people tend to bang on about the way he looks a bit, particularly in comments sections, but also in articles about his work. I bet there will be as many comments on this video about his floppy hair and lovely eyes as there will be about the scientific content. My point was that I find his evident passion for it all far more gripping than the way he looks, charming though he is
Sempiternal speech is problematic in that it requires an infinite amount of energy, not only that but Youtube has a limited on the length of videos you are able to upload.
@juki0h No. Just generate a script. Rehearse it many times. Then start doing free shows. Then start charging for your shows. Don't answer questions from the audience. He is an entertainer.
@Jaboie So what, man? Science needs people like him. It needs meticulous career academics but it also needs David Attenboroughs,s, Stephen J. Goulds and Brian Coxes who convince the masses - and by extension, the legislators - that this shit is actually interesting and important. We might not have a LHD if it weren't for people like him.
@2006Pace2006 Yes I agree, but I was responding to juki0h who stated that he would have to study to do something like this, which I was informing him was a false idea. No study would be required, only rehearsing your script, much like a comedian. I like listening to this information too. I guess out of context you didn't understand what I was typing. When a comment has @(name) before it, find that comment to get a fuller understanding of the conversation. Have a great day.
@svrussell I didn't mean to offend you. I had no idea that you personally identified yourself with this guy and that other peoples opinions have such power over you. If I make any future comments just assume that they are for everyone except you. Have a good day.
@Jaboie why do you assume i'm offended or personally invested because i asked a simple question (which you didn't answer, by the way) and voiced an opinion about your comment? your smarmy response tells me my instinct wasn't off the mark.
I don't really like the math "magic" they are doing. They basically make mathematical models describing particles and those models at this moment are viable and appear to work but it does not mean that those particles exist, there may be another more convoluted model that is equivalent in it's predictions to the one they use now, would that mean that the particles it describes there really exist? It's all mathematical shenanigans, useful but shouldn't be taken as complete fact.
How can you rewrite physics? We are merely discovering what has been there since this universe began. Think of it this way if you must, relativity is in direct conflict with quantum mechanics for when they both encroach on each others' domains they both fail which implies they are both wrong or at the very least restricted to their respective domains (still wrong). However in their respective domains they both work exceedingly well. That is what i meant by shenanigans.
Cox is not a fraud. WTF? He's doing what he loves and is making money? People who don't like him are just like people who don't like musicians. It's not that the musicians can't sing. they just hate them because they are famous. PESSIMISTS
Amazing stuff - I often wish I was involved a lot more with physics. I don't know what it was but the math, but it just never clicked with me like it did for others, literature and writing has always been my thing. As hard as I would try, equations and crazy symbols always just had the effect of confusing the fuck out of me.
They where created by fluctuations of the 11th dimension. (the big bang) I surely hope this is not another ill attempt to bring "God" into the scientific dialogue. And if it is, I would ask you to please refrain from asking questions that you have yet to considerer about that pseudo-phylosophy you are trying to push. Merely the question of who created God.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Chris Tarrant has done more for the world of general knowledge than this guy has for the world of science...I mean we actually have to pay the bbc for this guy to pop up now and again. Why!?
Also, we have to listen to him going on about his accolades as a "rock guy". So what, he knew a few chords playing for the labour parties karaoke crew - hardly rock and roll!
Maybe he's wrong about the Mayan calander - then really, things can only get better. End of the world Cox or go back to school.
@MrRyancocks So why are you on a video of him then.....Are you really trying to compare Chris Tarrant and PROF Brian Cox. Come on get real. Do you know what he has done in his career? Also you will notice its everyone else mentioning D-Rem and not him. Does he mention it in this film???? I think someone is slightly jealous.....
"This equation though, allows you to calculate everything other than gravity that happens in the universe, so if you want to know why the sky is blue, why atomic Nuclei stick together, in principle if you have a big enough computer, why DNA is the shape it is."
@DemonicGhostwithin really, i always thought i would have done really well there and been able to focus more, public schools especially high school was very hard for me
@boogiebuddy01 I guess it depends on what school you go too but when I went there, my grades dropped and I did some stuff I won't share with the internet
@NightmareSolider and that, my friend, is SO very much the thing, spot on! and it's not so much as we have a new Carl Sagan, it's a relay-race continuity at the same pationate pace. I love it. Wonderfull times. cheers from Poland.
Brian Cox = Baller status. That guy is so young and so intelligent and has so much promise. If i were a betting man (and i am) I would bet that this guy changes the world big time!
@SackFulloApplez1993 They're still looking! Once they can say with a high degree of certainty that the particle exists or doesn't exist, they can then incorporate that into Theory & gain a better understanding of the universe.
What is most amazing is how the research here is cutting the edge of our understanding of the Universe. That Einstein was wrogn that particles CAN travel faster than light is just amazing!
@E7018LowHydrogen can and do... And actually its been generally believed for many years his research was flawed, It has only recently received the media attention to bring it to public light.
the beauty about science? people will never stop asking the question that is why, this is why science will over come religion because it gives answers rather than orders in which to obey without question, whether god is real or not science will prove the answer rather than a 2000 year old book called the bible.
@kreatorRage i disagree i mean truly religion i believe in religion in and what i'm hearing here, my science teacher ( who is also my religion teacher) doesn't mix them but i still believe in both, you also have to let people believe what the want to believe and i respect your opinion but i want to get mine out there too. science doesn't mean religion is wrong and religion doesn't mean science is wrong only to certain people is that true but not to me.
If you're really a science nerd like I am, belief is out of the question. Belief itself is ludicrously preposterous if you know your way around the universe, you're embracing ignorance and arrogance by following a cult which believes the earth is 4000 years old.
You really have got to be kidding me, don't let yourself be diluted by Iron Age fairytales.
@ammachi3, hmm, finding the last piece to a equation that with out fail can answer any question.... Thus allowing absolute foreknowledge of outcomes for every experiment, is totally useless. Being able to eliminate trials of dead end methods, pointless, along with how worthless it will to be able to save all our effort and resources for the stuff we know can work..... Totally agree. You should write a book. You seem to out smart thousands of particle physicists, and even kaku, cox, hawking to n
anidork 10 hours ago
gotta love all the folks who knock this stuff online... all while using a by-product of cern... the internet.
amh1230 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
pure genius, and to those who think this is a pointless science, get real! no science is pointless!! if you want to have a go at cost etc just look at the military spend of the world...what a waste that is
JasonMunro13 5 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
pure genius, and to those who think this is a pointless science, get real! no science is pointless!! if you want to have a go at cost etc just look at the military spend of the world...what a waste that is
JasonMunro13 5 days ago
pure genius, and to those who think this is a pointless science, get real! no science is pointless!! if you want to have a go at cost etc just look at the military spend of the world...what a waste that is
JasonMunro13 5 days ago
Come on people, get real. This is just a stupid science people’s ego trip. It has nothing to offer us practically that can alleviate the ills of our world. Thus, it is an obviously morally repulsive waste of money, time & energy. Imagine what could have been achieved if those 10,000 scientists, set their collective minds to mitigating climate change, or creating new energy sources/infrastructure? In short, they should have done something that actually mattered.
ammachi3 1 week ago
@ammachi3 they all study all those things with that, to know all those wether problems go first to the fundamentals,, what we are really made of,, all this these things around us.. 100 years ago germs is just a theory,, but now we all know thers just morte than just bacteria, we all know the atom.. hard to explain in text.. we need this project.. its vital for their study...
UrgentUrge 1 week ago
@UrgentUrge I was not knocking all of science. I was saying that the LHC is a waste of time, energy & money. Which it is. We could have put the money into creating alternatives energy sources to fossil fuels or better health care.
ammachi3 1 week ago
@UrgentUrge This smashing of particles business is just a big kid’s fantasy that has no real significance. So what if they find the Higgs Boson. Wopty f**king doooo….what has that changed? Absolutely nothing…that’s what. There will still be the same amount of pain and suffering in the world, probably more because we choose to spend money on this instead of other things. That is the truth, my friend.
ammachi3 1 week ago
Considering the cost of the war in iraq is like a thousand times more expensive, you can go suck it. Knowledge is the tool we use to solve the worlds problems, no matter how obscure it might seem to you.
drjharri 6 days ago
Oh yeah this is just the greatest thing eve...I bet it will spontaneously solve world hunger and poverty when they find the Higgs Boson...and it will magical suck up all the atmospheric CO2 so that we don’t boil our planet...oh oh...I bet it will give us unlimited energy so that we don’t have to worry about peak oil...oh and it surely will solve the economic collapse that is underway. No I hear you say...Why not? Ohhh...that’s right, because this is a pointless waste of time, energy and money.
ammachi3 1 week ago
Thumbs up if you had chills from 10:09 - 10:15.
kemchobhenchod 1 week ago
Comment removed
kemchobhenchod 1 week ago
Thank you, Brian, you have rekindled my passion for astronomy and astrophysics which my physics teachers try to crush.
wordsarecrazy 1 week ago
One of his heroes is Carl Sagan..........now i know
Nexusanctus 1 week ago
"Large 'Adron Collider"... To Cox it's LAC.. :P
llperlrll 2 weeks ago
Like si viniste por alex
antoniojodar 2 weeks ago 3
Alexelcapo
faferico95 2 weeks ago 5
Did and come*
sMACkedaroundTV 2 weeks ago
My thought is where did all that stufff in the beginning come from.... If nothing existed then then where dud all the matter cone from.... I am try to see the atheist and agnostic point of view on the creation
sMACkedaroundTV 2 weeks ago
I like that the sheer magnitude and literal awesomeness of the scientific creation story makes him feel "incredibly valuable", not insignificant.
aRockandRollNerd 2 weeks ago
He's kinda cute :)
sMACkedaroundTV 2 weeks ago
A likely story... The ones of us who aren't going to hell know the universe was created in 6 days by god... Can't really explain how, but you know it happened because the bible said it, and you know the bibles right because it's gods word, and you know god exists because the bible says it, and you know the bible's right because god said it...
JimmyTheKiller 2 weeks ago
@JimmyTheKiller
That's the Daytona 500 of logic.
opmike343 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nom Nom Brain Cox
ism3c 2 weeks ago
Nom Nom Brain Cox
ism3c 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
To "find" that which is supposedly omnipresent, at the rate of just once in 2x10^16 events, and at 2-3 sigma at that, is wishful thinking, at best. But it is never going to be enough for particle physicists. When they fail this time (and fail they will -- mass is a concept without absolute definition, just as time and space-time are), their military sponsors will provide even more taxpayers' trillions...
omerbashich 3 weeks ago
He kind of looks like Keanu Reeves
hedes 3 weeks ago 3
@hedes Kinda...
MetalxXxMayhem 3 weeks ago
I don't understand the joke about Rutherford being from New Zealand...
charlesjamesjones 3 weeks ago 2
Comment removed
Denizen36 4 weeks ago
At the moment Higgs is very antipathetic to me.
Bluemann 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
To "find" that which is supposedly omnipresent, at the rate of just once in 2x10^16 events, and at 2-3 sigma at that, is wishful thinking, at best. But it is never going to be enough for particle physicists. When they fail this time (and fail they will -- mass is a concept without absolute definition, just as time and space-time are), their military sponsors will provide even more taxpayers' trillions...
omerbashich 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
what does he say about carl sagan in 13:33 ?i can't understand it.
happyhanieh 1 month ago
@happyhanieh he said "as one of my great hero's, Carl Sagen said, these are the things, and actually not only these, but I was looking around, these are the things, like Saturn 5 rockets and Sputnik and DNA and literature and science, these are the things that hydrogen atoms do when given 13.7 billion years"
akaAlexthekid 2 weeks ago
@akaAlexthekid THAAAAANK YOUU :' )
happyhanieh 1 week ago
Comment removed
happyhanieh 1 month ago
Comment removed
happyhanieh 1 month ago
Comment removed
happyhanieh 1 month ago
i had the snowflakes running at 3:23 - mind was sufficiently blown
a4anonymous 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
The dust of subatomic particles resulted after the collisions in LHC are particles of ethereal matter, even that the physicists give not them permission of existence! The electrical discharge to one Tesla coil was made and in a basin with water. Great was the surprise that the electrical discharge of the particles of electrical ether in water has the same ARBORESCENT SHAPE - proving the existence, and in water of the primary ethereal gravitational field.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
@sandustanBrasov SPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAM
TheNamelessCharacter 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
From 1967 I analyse with attention all published experiments concerning the accelerators of particles and the controlled thermonuclear fusion, moreover and the scriptural and paleoastronautical information. I had made only a logical and rational synthesis of the applied science, therefore my brothers- you block not the your sites and my computer. Please you to support me, how long, I still can produce such information.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
Now, were collided particles in LHC and you seen that is nothimg: none Higgs boson, none Big-Bang, neither black holes, but only thousands of shards of ethereal particles.Therefore, now -return you physicists from your distraction at Isaac Newton with his universal attraction law= THE UNIFIED LAW OF THE MATTERS AND FORCES, at the eliminated ETHER by Einstein, at the unseen world of the ethereal and spiritual matters which fill up the Cosmos, and return you at the Lord- at God!
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
The physicists show that about the discovery the Higgs boson it desire and the discovery the origins of the bodies'mass; the discovery the dark matter, the discovery the superior dimensions and the demonstration of the superposition. But as a result to the collisions of particles- the black holes had appeared not, the Big-Bang had appeared not demonstrating that the Large Hadron Collider bring not about us the Apocalipse.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
It say: with the exception of the Higgs boson all the predicted particles of Standard Model were detected and the them properties were measured with precision. The Standard Model of particles to arrived let be verified, but, if the Higgs boson is not finded, then the Standard Model and the others models will be necessary to be reconstruct from zero.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
In 1964 physicist Peter Higgs has thinked existence to one energetic field which penetrate whole Universe, and named it "Higgs field" and his particles named "Higgs boson"and that these can give mass the subatomic particles.Thus appear the necessity as in the CERN-frame let it construct an accelerator more big: the LARGE HADRON COLLIDER,which made the first collisions of particles in 14 December 2009, afterwards in 2010, in 2011 and they uncovered not the Higgs boson particles
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
The movement of the celestial bodies in Cosmos demonstrates that these it can not maintain in the existent formation if not would exist and another matter which let complete and fill up the Cosmos. And this unknown matter, which is the eliminated ETHER- they named she: dark matter and dark energy, which is in proportion of 96% from the Cosmos's mass.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
Already the protons, neutrons and electrons are formed through condensation and concentration of the etehreal particles. But how the ETHER has eliminated from physics, the physicists had invented the Standard Model of the particles and them forces excluding the gravity. Thus for to comprise and the gravity with her particles and forces they had invented and the strings theory.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
• SandustanBrasov
The materials seem to be complicated and irregular at the sight with the free eye. But at microscope they it show simple and orderly. All the material shapes: animal. vegetal and mineral are made from atoms and these only from three constituents: protons, neutrons and electrons. The photon of light we see it and the photon of heat we feel it, but the ethereal particles are more small, of a few thousands time; we see not them now, but the our spirits see them.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
• SandustanBrasov
If in 1905 Einstein excludes the ETHER from physics, viz excludes the intergalactic matter, then the his disciples arrive with the relativity theory at Big-Bang, at black holes, holes of worm, at singularity and today at travel in time. Thus the great explosion of George Gamov and his fellows R.A.Ipher and R.C.Hermann, become cosmological standardized theory which is one great bluff!
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
Between 1930...1935 the discord was photon of light.The opinion of physicists had not adopted existence in flight to photon, and photon remain without mass. If photon has not mass, he cannot interact with nothing on trajectory and the light speed remain constant lengthways the trajectory. Thus, in place let to consider that the photons lose themselves the speed on way as result the them interaction with the intergalactic matter, they had set the Universe let it dilate entirely
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
• SandustanBrasov
Today in front of our eyes and of the observation apparatuses it succedes all evolution phases of the celestial bodies, stars and galaxies. An evidence that the Universe doesn't seems to have an explosive beginning and doesn't seems to have ever an end in the his entirely. The facts demonstrates that in Universe the cyclical creation has place continuously in certain parts, and can has not place total creation in the same time in all the mass of the Universe.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
• SandustanBrasov
As early as the time of Michael Faraday at scientific problems in contradiction, academical circles decided victory the some or another.In this optics of domination of certain conceptions: philosophical, theological and of other principles, in science had penetrated mistaken and fallacious theories, and the impossibility of immediate verification, to leaded at the creation others abstractings which had blocked the road of the scientific innovation with practical applications.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
• SandustanBrasov
Today, on measure that the theory advances from classic mechanics to the quantum mechanics the particle and the wave are gradual dematerialize. The modern physics is blocked by enunciation of some laws and mistaken principles as: relativity theory, Hubble's law, postulation that the atom can't emit and absorb radiations continously, admitting the postulate what claims the photons without mass a.s.o. These guide- us at supernatural and at the technical and technological blocage
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
• SandustanBrasov
Nikola Tesla argued that:" I hold that the space cannot be curved, for the simple reason that it can has not properties. Of properties it can speak only when it work with the matter which fill up the space. The empty space it can not curve because- something- can not action about -nothing". This relativity proceed from a philosophical direction, on which A.Einstein produce her when he was found in a state of technical and religious confusion.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• Sand ustanBrasov
Einstein ignore and vex over 100 of men of science which had signed a petition in which they upholded that the his relativity theory is wrongly. It renounce at the absolute space and absolute time, it arrive at the Lorentz-Einstein's transformations through the introduction to two factors- subunitary and superunitary what lead at the infinte mass phantoms, at the infinte energy phantoms and at the infinte impuls phantoms when a body or particle would touch the light speed.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
As a result of the wrong interpretation of the Michelsom-Morley(1881)'s experiments which had demonstrated that the ETHER is entirely trained with the mass and the Earth's atmosphere, in 1905 A.Einstein renounced at the ether notion, at absolute space and set the relativist mecanics' base. He emits the two restricted relativity principles through which excludes the Ether, impose as limit of bodies' movement -the light speed and denatured completely the classic dynamics reality
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
Thus, the primary gravitational field it manifest as a solid body for the electrical ether and the electromagnetic phenomenons, and in the same time it manifest as a fluid body for the ethereal concentrated bodies and for the chemical bodies. We perceive the secondary gravitational field among the astral bodies. and in the electrical unloading's case which are ARBORESCENT we perceive and the primary gravitational field of the primary electrogenic particles.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
But celestial sources say us that whole Cosmos is filled with a dense powder of alive ethereal and electrogenic particles, and among they are streams of particles and more small because gravitational primary attraction among they, constituting primary gravitational field.But more exist,in the same space and secundary gravitational field produced by the ethereal concentrated particles in the ethereal bodies and in the chemical bodies which are neutral from electrical viewpoint.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
With much before Einstein, J.C.Maxwell starts from a mental experience, says that he generalize the Faraday's Electric Induction law and exclaims that the transmited wave would be a successive creation of magnetic fields and electric fields perpendicular between them and on the propagation direction. Since then it preachs the transmission of the electromagnetic wave at thousands kilometres without material suport.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
Leibnitz(1646...1716) German scientist, forerunner of the mathematical logic, through the denial the newtonian space- time is and he a forerunner of the Einstein's relativity. Einstein considers the gravity as a property of the space and not in the least as a property of the matter which fill up this space. The Einstein's relativity is a geometrization of the space.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
In the century XIX, the new scholars: Coulomb, Laplace, Ampere, Poisson, Green, Gauss, Webwer etc., had holded the action's theory at distance without material support, and they support only the mathematical abstracted theories. The science already started let it cover more much with the theory than with the practice.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SandustanBrasov
The theory without logic and reason is and remain an non-reality.The science is at beginning a theory, but has logic and reason and become true after the her practical realisation.The space it stretch in Infinite and the time come from Infinite and it stretch in Infinite marking the reality of the ours material world seen and unseen.The faithless man believe not that exist the God with the our world seen and unseen and then this man can not think and judge with real elements.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
• SandustanBrasov
A.Einstein through the his relativity to REVERSED the reality of the our terresterial world. He remove the ETHER from physics and give materiality the space and the time. But the SPACE limit the place where it can unfolding material actions and the TIME mark the period of unfolding to some material actions. The space and the time are only ABSTRACT notions, absolute and colateral which show where and when it unfolding certain material actions.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
The theorist physicist omit to study the science's history as let understand the things and phenomenons, but they learn only the exposed theory for to obtain a diploma, afterwards they twitter. We must let understand the science and how it was builded. Einstein has and good parts, but those mistaken are catastrophic. But Einstein was not single in the supporting the mistakes.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SandustanBrasov
The theoretical mistakes from centuries XIX and XX, had been amplified and had passed noisily in century XXI. Many experiments and terrestrial and extraterrestrial observations was wrongly interpreted because theoretical physics indoctrinated with Einstein's relativity.Thus was started the investigation of subatomic particles without ethereal matters and was started the building of the ITER without to know the electrical ether and his role in the working of the magnetic trap
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SandustanBrasov
The heavenly embodied world together with the heavenly unembodied world or free spirits- they had created and spreated- us on all the Earth surface, they had mixed- us and raised ones against another; they created us at a certain moment certain problems on which we must solve for can exist as terrestrial embodied beings, for gain our experience and our world personality.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
Science. It works, bitches.
Xhalph 1 month ago
@very religious people: they see me discoverin'... they hatin
therealjordiano 1 month ago
So smart
danrobbo1000 1 month ago
Brian Cox please stop with the plastic surgeries!
Pavlina78 1 month ago
He always smileys :o
blablaKeks015 1 month ago 4
Wouldn't it be marvellous if this video could be shown once a year in all churches, chapels or mosques to replace the standard religious message. It really puts in perspective the bronze age folk tales that underpin the great world religions.
Douglaslid 1 month ago 3
Comment removed
blablaKeks015 1 month ago
I think the fact that he's gorgeous might just be a coincidence - what grips me when Brian Cox talks that isn't necessarily there with others is his enthusiasm and how clearly you can see how much he loves it all. It's adorable and it's really very inspiring.
FunkyMonkeyJunkie302 1 month ago 27
@FunkyMonkeyJunkie302 Brian is not 'that' gorgeous! OK so my 15 yo female cousin thinks he's gorgeous, but I'm male and 37 and i don't find him the least bit gorgeous.... I think he needs a haircut!
So perhaps Brian's gorgeousness is subjective, and limited to teenage girls ???
grinblurnar 2 weeks ago
@grinblurnar Surely, all gorgeousness is subjective (for the record, I know adults who quite fancy him... ha ha)? But people tend to bang on about the way he looks a bit, particularly in comments sections, but also in articles about his work. I bet there will be as many comments on this video about his floppy hair and lovely eyes as there will be about the scientific content. My point was that I find his evident passion for it all far more gripping than the way he looks, charming though he is
FunkyMonkeyJunkie302 2 weeks ago
it wasn't discovered, they found evidence in a sigma 2 area. they need at least sigma 5 evidence to claim the higgs exists.
TojiChiba 1 month ago
The Higgs particles was just discovered at the Large Hadron Collider! HURRAY FOR SCIENCE! The theory is now complete!
Carbonizer8 1 month ago
Comment removed
Carbonizer8 1 month ago
100 billion suns......for starters...awesome...
pickasomangoes 1 month ago
I sincerely would. Not even joking, not even desperate.
TheBrothersPlage 1 month ago
Excellent!
Though I think 63 people must have spent 16 minutes waiting for the bit about the talking snake in the magic garden.
RevYars 1 month ago 12
Excellent !!
AbstrusaMonterodos 1 month ago
@FunitzoJunior Are you a woman then?
Ichibaz 1 month ago
I watch Brain Cox every day before revising for a level physics
Flextaa 1 month ago
@Flextaa u cuda told me that personally ... -.-'
Hardrock4 1 month ago
@Hardrock4 ... dude how do you keep finding out my comments
Flextaa 1 month ago
@juki0h
You need to study harder to spell school correctly
TheOddlog 1 month ago
i understood none of that
bobolishas 2 months ago
He did make a documentary like cosmos, actually he made two for the BBC, wonders of the solar system & wonders of the universe. They are on you tube.
BFitz1976 2 months ago
@BFitz1976 Fun fact: Neil deGrasse Tyson is currently making a direct sequel series to Cosmos
NinjaCameraman 2 months ago
I just want him to keep talking forever.
Nebulafantasy 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Nebulafantasy
"I just want him to keep talking forever."
Sempiternal speech is problematic in that it requires an infinite amount of energy, not only that but Youtube has a limited on the length of videos you are able to upload.
[/science]
: )
smallblueclouds 1 month ago
@FunitzoJunior i dont, i just want a beer with him.
chappyhardcore 2 months ago
He should make a documentary like Cosmos
Please ...
ilifeform 2 months ago
0:37
NOPE Neutrino!
NeedForMadnessSVK 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I'm nowhere near a scientist, but this is quite interesting.
squadedgar 2 months ago
He look like artist.
MrCIickHere 2 months ago
damn, i need to study harder in shcool if i ever want to do something like this
juki0h 2 months ago 15
@juki0h No. Just generate a script. Rehearse it many times. Then start doing free shows. Then start charging for your shows. Don't answer questions from the audience. He is an entertainer.
Jaboie 1 month ago
@Jaboie So what, man? Science needs people like him. It needs meticulous career academics but it also needs David Attenboroughs,s, Stephen J. Goulds and Brian Coxes who convince the masses - and by extension, the legislators - that this shit is actually interesting and important. We might not have a LHD if it weren't for people like him.
2006Pace2006 4 weeks ago 3
@2006Pace2006 Yes I agree, but I was responding to juki0h who stated that he would have to study to do something like this, which I was informing him was a false idea. No study would be required, only rehearsing your script, much like a comedian. I like listening to this information too. I guess out of context you didn't understand what I was typing. When a comment has @(name) before it, find that comment to get a fuller understanding of the conversation. Have a great day.
Jaboie 3 weeks ago
@Jaboie then why aren't you doing it yourself? you sound like an ass.
svrussell 3 weeks ago
@svrussell I didn't mean to offend you. I had no idea that you personally identified yourself with this guy and that other peoples opinions have such power over you. If I make any future comments just assume that they are for everyone except you. Have a good day.
Jaboie 3 weeks ago
@Jaboie why do you assume i'm offended or personally invested because i asked a simple question (which you didn't answer, by the way) and voiced an opinion about your comment? your smarmy response tells me my instinct wasn't off the mark.
svrussell 3 weeks ago
I don't really like the math "magic" they are doing. They basically make mathematical models describing particles and those models at this moment are viable and appear to work but it does not mean that those particles exist, there may be another more convoluted model that is equivalent in it's predictions to the one they use now, would that mean that the particles it describes there really exist? It's all mathematical shenanigans, useful but shouldn't be taken as complete fact.
neurel111 2 months ago
@neurel111 Re-writing the basic principles of physics, or even nature itself, is 'shenanigans' to you?
idkagoodusernameyet 2 months ago
@idkagoodusernameyet
How can you rewrite physics? We are merely discovering what has been there since this universe began. Think of it this way if you must, relativity is in direct conflict with quantum mechanics for when they both encroach on each others' domains they both fail which implies they are both wrong or at the very least restricted to their respective domains (still wrong). However in their respective domains they both work exceedingly well. That is what i meant by shenanigans.
neurel111 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
03:38 The universe is made of
Twelve particles of matter
Four forces of nature
14:10 That's a wonderful and significant story
pinkeinke2 2 months ago
43°? I thought he was 20
MoacirFB 2 months ago 2
I love CERN and i love science i think that the Hadron Collider is so amazing!!!!
kaytlynmarcotte 2 months ago
He's always so smiley :D Science is amazing.
BlackMetalNinja 2 months ago 5
Cox is not a fraud. WTF? He's doing what he loves and is making money? People who don't like him are just like people who don't like musicians. It's not that the musicians can't sing. they just hate them because they are famous. PESSIMISTS
Jaybond63 2 months ago
I came here to only watch the parts featured in symphony of science but then ended up watching the entire video. This is really interesting...
SimulationGuy121 2 months ago 2
Amazing stuff - I often wish I was involved a lot more with physics. I don't know what it was but the math, but it just never clicked with me like it did for others, literature and writing has always been my thing. As hard as I would try, equations and crazy symbols always just had the effect of confusing the fuck out of me.
Griffinltd 2 months ago
and who creates those particles? thats the question
syafiqzailan 3 months ago
@syafiqzailan
They where created by fluctuations of the 11th dimension. (the big bang) I surely hope this is not another ill attempt to bring "God" into the scientific dialogue. And if it is, I would ask you to please refrain from asking questions that you have yet to considerer about that pseudo-phylosophy you are trying to push. Merely the question of who created God.
MamonMuch 2 months ago
@MamonMuch basically still a theory... it could be anything else. how u could be so sure?
syafiqzailan 2 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Chris Tarrant has done more for the world of general knowledge than this guy has for the world of science...I mean we actually have to pay the bbc for this guy to pop up now and again. Why!?
Also, we have to listen to him going on about his accolades as a "rock guy". So what, he knew a few chords playing for the labour parties karaoke crew - hardly rock and roll!
Maybe he's wrong about the Mayan calander - then really, things can only get better. End of the world Cox or go back to school.
MrRyancocks 3 months ago
@MrRyancocks So why are you on a video of him then.....Are you really trying to compare Chris Tarrant and PROF Brian Cox. Come on get real. Do you know what he has done in his career? Also you will notice its everyone else mentioning D-Rem and not him. Does he mention it in this film???? I think someone is slightly jealous.....
midfielderlegend 2 months ago
@MrRyancocks I smell jealousy.
MrSaRsAgE 2 months ago
Didn't mention the part where he spilled yogurt on it, though.
kiradoyouknow 3 months ago 3
@kiradoyouknow made me lawl :D
CrissCross407 2 months ago
Physics, its like, fookin brilliant, and that
FureyinHD 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"This equation though, allows you to calculate everything other than gravity that happens in the universe, so if you want to know why the sky is blue, why atomic Nuclei stick together, in principle if you have a big enough computer, why DNA is the shape it is."
Because someone else will want to quote it too.
jamesahibbard 3 months ago
Comment removed
jamesahibbard 3 months ago
I have the biggest mancrush on him...
jamesahibbard 3 months ago
@FunitzoJunior WTF
Gytax0 3 months ago
If my physics teacher looked like Brian Cox I wouldn't be failing his class.
YukiManic 3 months ago 26
geniusssss
tom01727851588 3 months ago
uncertainty is ok, its what we were when we were young
boogiebuddy01 3 months ago
i wish i could have gone to private school
boogiebuddy01 3 months ago
@boogiebuddy01 its not all its cracked up to be
DemonicGhostwithin 3 months ago
@DemonicGhostwithin really, i always thought i would have done really well there and been able to focus more, public schools especially high school was very hard for me
boogiebuddy01 3 months ago
@boogiebuddy01 I guess it depends on what school you go too but when I went there, my grades dropped and I did some stuff I won't share with the internet
DemonicGhostwithin 3 months ago
I want that T-shirt.
CulBaka 3 months ago
4:25 the guy looking at his thumbnail lol
TheUnforgivent 3 months ago
Brian Cox, In my opinion is the universes replacement for Carl Sagan, I cant wait to see where he is in 20 years. Good Luck Good sir.
NightmareSolider 3 months ago 3
@NightmareSolider and that, my friend, is SO very much the thing, spot on! and it's not so much as we have a new Carl Sagan, it's a relay-race continuity at the same pationate pace. I love it. Wonderfull times. cheers from Poland.
marcinha1973 3 months ago
These TED talks should really be shown primetime on television.
misinglink15 3 months ago 29
Brian Cox = Baller status. That guy is so young and so intelligent and has so much promise. If i were a betting man (and i am) I would bet that this guy changes the world big time!
DaBluedude100 3 months ago 2
@DaBluedude100 ahahah, baller status: that made my day! :D
hongyi8 3 months ago
Also can someone give me that huge equation he showed. I wanna know why dirt is brown.
SackFulloApplez1993 3 months ago
So did they discover those heggs particles?
SackFulloApplez1993 3 months ago
@SackFulloApplez1993 Either outcome is desirable. Discovery or lack of discovery
Mandragara 3 months ago
@Mandragara So they didn't find anything. =(
SackFulloApplez1993 3 months ago
@SackFulloApplez1993 They're still looking! Once they can say with a high degree of certainty that the particle exists or doesn't exist, they can then incorporate that into Theory & gain a better understanding of the universe.
Mandragara 3 months ago
What is most amazing is how the research here is cutting the edge of our understanding of the Universe. That Einstein was wrogn that particles CAN travel faster than light is just amazing!
E7018LowHydrogen 4 months ago
@E7018LowHydrogen can and do... And actually its been generally believed for many years his research was flawed, It has only recently received the media attention to bring it to public light.
DaBluedude100 3 months ago
"The universe is made of
Twelve particles of matter
Four forces of nature
That's a wonderful and significant story"
Yade10245 4 months ago 216
@Yade10245 ..."and H"
theroboticcat 3 months ago
@Yade10245 I love that song...........;)
woodenslave 2 months ago
outstanding video,,,Brian Cox is amazing scientist , i really enjoy listening to him.
if you haven't red his book'' Wonders of the Universe'' please do .
valko007 4 months ago
super interesting
hovsec 4 months ago
can anyone tell me where I can find that equation? please.
wildstarlights2 4 months ago
@wildstarlights2 search for "standard model equation" on google images
PBMS123 4 months ago
He always reminds me of Cillian Murphy.
Dincorta 4 months ago 4
Humans are awesome
purewilderness 4 months ago 5
He looks like Cher.
GeorgeBushLicker 4 months ago
@GeorgeBushLicker LOL
Zanzulfanten 4 months ago
he's an amazing public speaker, I thoroughly enjoyed this talk!
sorrysonofa 4 months ago
the beauty about science? people will never stop asking the question that is why, this is why science will over come religion because it gives answers rather than orders in which to obey without question, whether god is real or not science will prove the answer rather than a 2000 year old book called the bible.
JordanStreet91 4 months ago
This talk is nice and all, but how soon can we expect you to build some Stargates?
ApocDevTeam 4 months ago 3
@ApocDevTeam Fuckin rights!
DaBluedude100 3 months ago
That calculation at 7:00 Is that like.. the calculation for the "Theory of Everything" ?
Pindakoekje69 4 months ago
Love is the message of jesus,but science is all around us.
johnwelshmorris5 4 months ago
@kreatorRage i disagree i mean truly religion i believe in religion in and what i'm hearing here, my science teacher ( who is also my religion teacher) doesn't mix them but i still believe in both, you also have to let people believe what the want to believe and i respect your opinion but i want to get mine out there too. science doesn't mean religion is wrong and religion doesn't mean science is wrong only to certain people is that true but not to me.
roylivingston 4 months ago
@roylivingston your so close to being right... except for the bit where science proves religion wrong in so many places.
DaBluedude100 3 months ago
Cox is the man.
DuskOnVega 4 months ago
If you're really a science nerd like I am, belief is out of the question. Belief itself is ludicrously preposterous if you know your way around the universe, you're embracing ignorance and arrogance by following a cult which believes the earth is 4000 years old.
You really have got to be kidding me, don't let yourself be diluted by Iron Age fairytales.
KreatorRage 4 months ago