That's the oldest excuse. You hit someone else's car, or you hit someone's house, or whatever....all you have to say is: "My brakes went out!" and you'll get away with it....
true and not at the same time. If you hit something hard enouth, your brakes will be shot. Also, you can blame it on brake fade, " the pedal was stiff, than it went soft on me for a second, and thats when i plowed into the back of you officer"
I just got done paying a $1050 dollar traffic fine.
Oh, and the dumbass dude should have been paying attention. If his brakes really would have failed, he would have noticed, for one, and a smart person would have used thier E-brake gradually until they stopped.
Yeah, but if he would have been watching the road in front of him, he would have had plenty of time to stop anyways with the E-brake.
It wouldn't be smart to switch to a different lane unless he looked up and saw the cop at teh last minute...because then he would have been either in the middle of traffic, without any brakes, or flying off the road without any brakes.
Lesson hopefully learned :watch where you're drivin, damnit!
yea u can...if u notice u can see the other lane at the top left of ur screen...and he should have been breaking for a while back..it was a long straight strech and if he noticed his brakes were out why didnt he changed his lanes a while back rather then potentially killing himself
The only testimony in any court case involving this accident taken as "evidence" will be the "officers". All citizen testimony is deemed "heresay" under British based U.S. law and deemed useless. The ONLY person to be "believed" by the court is THEIR "agent", the "officer". Its a stacked deck.
82 dollars and listed for a witness. well guess who's going 2 lie in court.
Litoaznboi415 3 weeks ago
avatar people ^.^
freddiebig1 7 months ago
The people look really blue
TheSquirrelGurl10 7 months ago
Oh sure, ill be a witness for you copper. "The cops lights were not on your honor, the cop is lying."
archon808 9 months ago
I just got a 51 in a 35 ticket and had to pay 110.50
lempfert22 10 months ago
82 BUCKS!!! Im moving to that state!
rojm 1 year ago
@rojm Yeah, that's what I was thinking. In NY I have to pay $200 all together.
BrothersGroove 1 year ago
pretty blue tail lights
dnl5649 1 year ago
@dnl5649 yeah i noticed that too, weird..
Maserati7200 1 year ago
@dnl5649 its not just the car he stopped all the other cars seem to have blue tail lights so im guessing its some wierd setting on the camera
halorocks647983 1 year ago
@halorocks647983
Can i be your John Watson? Seirously though, OFCOURSE its a problem with the video/camera i mean the grass is fucking purple lol.
MyDoominateR 11 months ago
That's the oldest excuse. You hit someone else's car, or you hit someone's house, or whatever....all you have to say is: "My brakes went out!" and you'll get away with it....
ethen24 2 years ago
not if they do any check on the brakes!!!
coolguy89890 2 years ago
Yeah, just come up with another lie/excuse to make sure they don't check the brakes! lol
ethen24 2 years ago
true and not at the same time. If you hit something hard enouth, your brakes will be shot. Also, you can blame it on brake fade, " the pedal was stiff, than it went soft on me for a second, and thats when i plowed into the back of you officer"
BlackLabel7345 2 years ago
Blue rear lights? That's illegal
mustangmikeca 2 years ago
i think its in negative....
bloonpop 2 years ago
the color is off on the vid. there is no red in it.
boatdude12 2 years ago
Heh.
$82 for 16 over.
I wish they were still that cheap.
I just got done paying a $1050 dollar traffic fine.
Oh, and the dumbass dude should have been paying attention. If his brakes really would have failed, he would have noticed, for one, and a smart person would have used thier E-brake gradually until they stopped.
Common sense.
EMERGENCY brake.
Not just for sliding around sideways, after all.
supastaa88 2 years ago
an even sensibler person would have turned the steering wheel to avoid the police car and then use the E-brake:)
fndjfgsdk 2 years ago
Lol.
Yeah, but if he would have been watching the road in front of him, he would have had plenty of time to stop anyways with the E-brake.
It wouldn't be smart to switch to a different lane unless he looked up and saw the cop at teh last minute...because then he would have been either in the middle of traffic, without any brakes, or flying off the road without any brakes.
Lesson hopefully learned :watch where you're drivin, damnit!
supastaa88 2 years ago
i didnt mean change lane... just go a little bit to the left to avoid the police car
fndjfgsdk 2 years ago
she lucky he was park far enough away that she did not get rammed
lovelyferret1 2 years ago 2
She is still applying make up LOL.
christychackojohn 2 years ago
I would said fuck no after you give the ticket you went me to be witness hell no
OutlawzAK 3 years ago 2
agree!
CrazyJopie 2 years ago
btw he said his brakes failed...then y not change lanes and coast 2 a stop....the other lane was free
mikeisinlovewithtay 3 years ago
because ramming a parked car is clearly a more quick and effective method of stopping
gorbasho 3 years ago 13
There may have been a car next to him , can't really tell in the vid.
Foxontherun2 2 years ago
yea u can...if u notice u can see the other lane at the top left of ur screen...and he should have been breaking for a while back..it was a long straight strech and if he noticed his brakes were out why didnt he changed his lanes a while back rather then potentially killing himself
mikeisinlovewithtay 2 years ago
what if the woman says "the cops lights were off" in her statement for revenge for the ticket lol.
fpsd0minat0r 3 years ago
the only evidence is you tube!
bfj804 3 years ago 3
The only testimony in any court case involving this accident taken as "evidence" will be the "officers". All citizen testimony is deemed "heresay" under British based U.S. law and deemed useless. The ONLY person to be "believed" by the court is THEIR "agent", the "officer". Its a stacked deck.
t4705mb6 3 years ago 10
traffic court and court of law it totally different
mikeisinlovewithtay 3 years ago
That is true but ALL courts embrace double standards.
In any case, is the double standard in traffic court "justice"?
t4705mb6 3 years ago