This comment has received too many negative votesshow
it's all theoretical, not only have we never seen these compounds in 3D
we still are living in the stone ages of mechanistic ideology, meaning the hodgkins-huxley cable theory etc is not well understood in anesthetics (or at all)
i know it may sound a bit egotistical or out-of-context to the distilled essence of this video, i must continue to give people different options in thinking, it all comes down to sympathetic vibratory physics and tesla's dynamic theory of gravity-condensate models
If you're referring to my statement, may you should have chosen your PhD in physics-chemistry and not fixing cars. Although I have a profound respect for anyone with mechanical knowledge
I do not have any respect for utter ignorance-indifference, which seems to run thick in every persons blood these days. The fact of the matter is you just don't know what you're talking about if you doubt my statement on our current theoretical understanding of atomistic modeling-material sciences
what do ya mean by never seeing these compounds in 3D = makes it theorethical bullshit that does not work??
r u ignorant ??ever heard of CoMFA ??
ANY drugs we used these days have its 3D representatives the fact we never saw it with eyes does not means its bull shit, ie:salbutamol, dopamine, neostigmine,physostigmine atracurium fluoxetinetc.. have 3D repsentatives and it fukin works fukin works
So dont call other people ignorance if u r ignorance urself
Brayde why is their a time at the bottom of the video, it only happens in the extras. Thanks for uploading them this is very interesting even for someone who loves physics more!
@alewisgb Those are the frames, you can tell because the last digit only goes up to 25 (the normal framerate for videos). its there so you can tell where he cut out.
@alewisgb That's time code. It's usually used on the raw footage when you're editing. Helps keep track of where or when a segment is from, when you're editing different chunks of video together. Also, you'll notice the last two digits count from 0 to 24, which is the standard number of frames per second for broadcast video.
1. it is a stylistic device to say "this is raw unedited footage... not the main film"
2. in the spirit of "raw footage" it let's people who REALLY want to know where the two chucks were said... eg: if there is cut with a 10 minute gap, people know much is left out.
3. nottinghamscience is supposed to show you behind the scenes, and timecode is something that gives you extra information... eg: low long the interviews were taking, etc
really fascinating. thanks!
mokopa 5 months ago
Hell yeah extra footage!
Daggawaggaboof 5 months ago
how does this models are called?? thanks
nickkap08 5 months ago
This video seems quiet. Headphones are at full blast and I'm having a little trouble hearing it.
lopdebif 5 months ago
I used to make those 3-dimensional shapes all the time.
My parents would step on them in the middle of the night and yell at me.
culwin 6 months ago
Ingenious.
Bobajobimus 6 months ago
Amazing stuff!
MrMichaelEdie 6 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
it's all theoretical, not only have we never seen these compounds in 3D
we still are living in the stone ages of mechanistic ideology, meaning the hodgkins-huxley cable theory etc is not well understood in anesthetics (or at all)
i know it may sound a bit egotistical or out-of-context to the distilled essence of this video, i must continue to give people different options in thinking, it all comes down to sympathetic vibratory physics and tesla's dynamic theory of gravity-condensate models
sn1pe352 6 months ago
@sn1pe352 In the movie 'Pearl Harbor', Col. Dolittle said to the pilot-hero, "That's bullshit! It's good bullshit, but it's still bullshit."
BuickDoc 6 months ago 4
@BuickDoc
If you're referring to my statement, may you should have chosen your PhD in physics-chemistry and not fixing cars. Although I have a profound respect for anyone with mechanical knowledge
I do not have any respect for utter ignorance-indifference, which seems to run thick in every persons blood these days. The fact of the matter is you just don't know what you're talking about if you doubt my statement on our current theoretical understanding of atomistic modeling-material sciences
sn1pe352 6 months ago
@sn1pe352
well the fact that one to three of the compound were screened to test for activity in both computer drug design modelling and in vitro
watch another video with the same title made by brady
showed that those fucking things does exist
wawabunny 5 months ago
@sn1pe352
what do ya mean by never seeing these compounds in 3D = makes it theorethical bullshit that does not work??
r u ignorant ??ever heard of CoMFA ??
ANY drugs we used these days have its 3D representatives the fact we never saw it with eyes does not means its bull shit, ie:salbutamol, dopamine, neostigmine,physostigmine atracurium fluoxetinetc.. have 3D repsentatives and it fukin works fukin works
So dont call other people ignorance if u r ignorance urself
wawabunny 5 months ago
@sn1pe352
also crystals of theses molecules are isolated in the other same titled video
MEANNG IT IS NOT bullshit
r u stpd??
wawabunny 5 months ago
Can you say me when they gonna get anti-cancer nanostuff?
MrAlexs888 6 months ago
@MrAlexs888 When its ready.
LamaPaj 6 months ago
Brayde why is their a time at the bottom of the video, it only happens in the extras. Thanks for uploading them this is very interesting even for someone who loves physics more!
alewisgb 6 months ago
@alewisgb Those are the frames, you can tell because the last digit only goes up to 25 (the normal framerate for videos). its there so you can tell where he cut out.
ethoxyethaan 6 months ago
@alewisgb That's time code. It's usually used on the raw footage when you're editing. Helps keep track of where or when a segment is from, when you're editing different chunks of video together. Also, you'll notice the last two digits count from 0 to 24, which is the standard number of frames per second for broadcast video.
BeanTVYWG 6 months ago
@alewisgb
It takes editing to remove it.
DanieleGiorgino 6 months ago
@alewisgb there are a few reasons, including
1. it is a stylistic device to say "this is raw unedited footage... not the main film"
2. in the spirit of "raw footage" it let's people who REALLY want to know where the two chucks were said... eg: if there is cut with a 10 minute gap, people know much is left out.
3. nottinghamscience is supposed to show you behind the scenes, and timecode is something that gives you extra information... eg: low long the interviews were taking, etc
Brady
nottinghamscience 6 months ago 23
@nottinghamscience Thanks for the response, it does make more sense now its explained and sorry for spelling your name wrong!
alewisgb 6 months ago
Great information!
colinmeister 6 months ago