Added: 2 years ago
From: machinima
Views: 102,873
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (637)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • STOP TALKING ABOUT HISTORY!!! This is Napoleon: Total War!

  • Lol ball of sunshine, I really don't know were yanks get their fuckin nerve.

  • Make new friends and catch up with old ones with the sexy Starbucks Paddock Girl

    youtube.com/watch?v=rJF2LpkRUu­c

  • @gucci13 there was a time when america was afraid of the Russians nd really? You don't have the biggest army in the world so stop with the ranting.....and even if you did bomb Britain you would be fucked as the EU nd the UN would come in and well that's that

  • esa broma es una porqueria

  • best game on the planet! Buy it!#

    Ive got this and think its great! Theres a thing to save and replay battles where every individual soldier is fighting and clubbing away and there are hundreds of them, you can move the camera wherever you like Fucking excellent!

    Well reccommended by me anyway.

    !

  • stupid steam broke and the repair thing doesnt work,i played napoelon for like a month and i was neva able to play it again,thats a waste of 40 fukin euros

  • cheers to napoleon..even when he is outnumbered in some battles he does not lose his balls and guts to fight.

  • @gucci13

    Napoleon's army is best on flat plains. Even with the same numbers people said Napoleon would win.

    But if Waterloo was fought later (or earlier, not sure) then he would have won due to French artillery having a greater effect.

  • We Brits were proud to fight by Austria, Prussia and Russia in those years!

  • If Napoleon was a legendary general, Then what was the Duke of Wellington? the Legend killer?

  • @LolFishFail he defeated napoleon but i would say thats because of the 30,000 prussian troops that made the difference and allowed the british to win.

  • @crimson177 I'm sorry but if the Prussians were so effective against Napoleon, how did the french manage to push through brandenburg and march on Russia?

    Britain kicked his arse, because Britain was returning from the american revolution conflict, barely scaved. The French army was destroyed returning to france by the Royal Navy. France was bankrupted by the war in America, so Britain showed them who truely is the Superpower of Europe.

  • @LolFishFail i never said "the Prussians were so effective against Napoleon". but they did make a difference in waterloo. the french had about 72000 men so 50000 prussians plus the 68000 british is a lot and that was enough to secure victory.

  • @crimson177 I thought you said they had 30,000 men :S oh well, the only thing that counts is that Germany and Britain are friends :D

  • @LolFishFail i did sorry my mistake

  • @LolFishFail The slow attack of marshal Michel Ney was the cause. Would he attacked wellington early, when his forces were not at full strenght, he had been victorius. But he let enough time for Wellington to bring more and more troops from the British Isles.

  • @Mogzyx Dude, A small town of welsh folk beat napoleons army.

  • @LolFishFail ROFL, English got there asses handed to them so many times by Nappie, even at waterloo, he was gonna kick there ass despite being sick himself and his army undersupplied and fatiqued. It was the arrival of the Prussians that made him commit troops too intercept which caused a weakened center which then fell before the english. Rich men buying commisions makes for bad armies. They where luckly wellington wasn't a fool since british chain of command was laughable at that time.

  • @WarSmurfs You're funny. Of course you're going to say that. since your country has been buttfucked for the last 500 years. The British Empire didn't last for nearly 600 years because of a "laughable" chain of command.

  • @LolFishFail

    600 years? the British Empire lasted for 200 years, when GUNS WERE AROUND. 600 years ago guns did not exist.

    Besides, i recall the only empire ever coming close economically was the Russian empire (300 billion) whilst British: (900 billion).

    Besides, if we had such a "laughable" chain of command, then we should have lost every battle. We didn't.

    How about you leave us Brits alone, right? we don't wars with people anymore, so just leave us alone.

  • @WolfytheWolf5667 everybody hates the british..

  • @gucci13

    Oh? name a few not-dictatorship countries or countries that lose to barely 10,000 men.

    also:

    THE SUN NEVER SETS ON THE BRITISH EMPIRE!

  • @WolfytheWolf5667 there is no more british empire..you can dream if you want..but britain is now a loyal pet to us americans..what ever order we ask to your Prime minister, he will surely follows...(because he is afraid to lose the british-american relations) that's why you keep tagging along with all the wars we are in to.LOL

    compare to U.S.A your 'british empire' is nothing..

  • @gucci13 two reasons y u r wrong 1. check up your history facts washington tried to invade canada but failed (Battle of Quebec 1775), fine u kicked their asses in the american civil war but u have to remember Britain was at war with france and Britain had all its forces spread out over a huge empire all over the world, while u fought on home territory. 2, dnt be stupid, the US relys on Britain just as much, in international relations, middle east trade +u think ur the only one wit aeroplanes??

  • @karolos211 there are also 2 reasons why you are wrong...1 nobody care a shit about washington invading canada except you. the point was americans kicked the asses of the british back to canada. we don't care about the details how we've won as long as we've won. its not our fault if the british stupidly spread out its forces, we don't care a shit. 2 dnt be an idiot, have you noticed that brits can't say no to any US policy?.we attacked iraq and afgnistan you fools followed like dogs.

  • @WolfytheWolf5667 rome..not to 10 000 but they had a 3 to 1 advantage over hannibal at all time..and if he would have attacked rome he would have won

  • @melculrapid Yes but carthage's senators didt send him the resources to do so because they though rome or some other hositle nation would retaliate by attacking carthage so hannibal what betrayed by some fucking coward that value there own wealth more than murdering feeble romans

  • @WolfytheWolf5667 You dumb bitch, I am British you tit head. If you count the English Empire as part of the British Empire's existence then it goes back nearly 1000 years the empire lasted for. Israel had been in the hands of the British since the crusades... If you read my comment correctly you'll see I was being sarcastic to the French guy... The British Empire lasted for 600 years if you count the English empire then it goes on up to 1000 years.

  • @LolFishFail

    I suppose technically we are still England. Britain is simply the land we reside on. Not our Country...

  • @WolfytheWolf5667 You are ignorant as hell. Scotland is not England, Wales is not England.

  • @LolFishFail nobody cares about what happened in the past..the important thing is that we americans can destroy your country by just dropping 3 nukes..LOLZ

    and too bad you can't nuke us back because(we have the strongest military in the world)

    F-22 raptors will just fly over to your queen's house and boom...

    and oh..we kicked your asses during the american revolution..and you brits grabbed your asses back into canada to avoid further whipping.LOL

  • @gucci13 You're such a funny man xD your jokes are hilarious!

  • @gucci13 How is your mighty military doing against the taliban..? They've shot more british troops than actual taliban haven't they? You don't have the strongest military hahaha!!! I hate you american bigots, you think your country is invincible when in fact it isn't, far form it. Oh and how did you do in vietnam..? You got your ass wupped didn't you..? Afraid to lose british and american relations..? I bet our PM doesn't give a flying fuck about america.

  • @gucci13 well aren't you a ball of sunshine

  • Hello Jason Isaacs.

  • LOL in 1:08 its pretty cool how the others don't even flinch when a guy gets shot right next to you. What kind of trainings did they take...

  • To bad you have to spend an extra 400 pounds for a good computer to run it...

  • @Snipe1930

    U do realize ur responding to an 8 month old comment

  • Britain=Navy

    Prussia=Massive Numbers

    Austria=same as ^

    Russia=Their winter

  • how sexual themes?

  • @zolltain1 Marriage. They get kids and stuff.. How do you think they do that?

  • @stygn lol i wouldnt count that as sexual themes! hahahaha

  • @zolltain1 I was just joking ; ) I cant you build brothels in those games? That's at least kind of sexual.... But again, they might just be called "Inn" or "Tavern" or something.. In that case it would not be sexual themes.

  • @zolltain1 0:47 are the sexual themes. haha

  • I just got an Alienware m17x and napoleon total war and its AWESOME!!!!!!

  • is this an add on or an indivudual game

  • you'd think that for a trailer, they'd use the highest graphics setting and make sure there was no lag....

  • what did hes say i couldnt understand a biggest ship of her time i couldnt hear the name he said someone help whats was the name of ship???

  • @mitjazupan1 Santissima Trinidad

  • shit shit and more shit

  • does this game have the same open campaign as Empire TW?

  • #CUTE Full Movie Central . com #OMG - it's free here

  • stream it online at Go Movie World . com

    

  • why won't they let us play it on mac?

  • what graphics card should i get for this game

  • Want to watch insane jaw-dropping Napoleon Total War commentaries with EPIC MUSIC be sure to visit Saiedz channel. This guy has changed the face of Commentaries and brought his own unique narrating style with awesome music from blockbuster movies such as the Lord of the rings, Gladiator, Kingdom of Heaven, and much more. He has attracted over 300 subscribers in two weeks and strongly growing with each commentary better than the previous. I promise you will not be dissapointed.

  • when does this come out i will ethier get this or empire total war what should i do

  • excellent movie guys :) there's a good copy at 'bigmovies4free' last time i checked! a really funny film

  • this game cost in the intertoys store €50

  • 0:29, anyone else notice the smokeis being sucked into the fire? lol

  • @Dauntless07

    ahaha! you're right xD

  • omg quality movie - enjoyed it from start to finish. i found a copy at "bigmovies4free" - hope they make another :P

  • I cant believe. This game is simple amazing.

    I love it.

    Today i downloaded in directdownloadgame :D com

    Remove :D and get it! This ll blow your mind!

  • this looks so good! <3

  • Anyone else that plays this know where the savegame folder is? I'm being overrun by savegames, but i can't find the cursed folder >:O

  • check your documents and the steam -> steamapps folder

  • Document and Settings --> Username --> Appdata --> Roaming (if you are using windows7) --> Creative Assembly --> Napoleon --> Save_game

    Remember you gotta turn on show hidden and system files option on in order to see "Appdata" folder in the first place.

  • i wonder wat would happen if napolion wasnt banished 0_o

  • In my Russian campaign, I tried to hold the peace with France while fighting the Ottomans. I did this for four years untill France invaded. I had a huge battle near Moscow where I lost 5000 men (4 full armies). The winter really pushed him back, and now I have a World War, and Austria and Poland have turned into massive killing fields where several thousand men die every turn. So far this has been the most fun of any total war game. The historical accuracy was also much better than empire...

  • Russia and Britain are the easyest campains, with the russian campain you only have the enemy comming from one side, and with britain it's realy unlikely that enemys come to the iland.

    nice for beginners^^

  • Russia is not easy on VHVH. The Ottomans in the south push hard, the French landed in Crimea and moved to Belgograd, and there is so much room in Russia I had a huge problem killing off the French armies, for they all went for Moscow. Britain, however, is probably really easy like you said.

  • That was the problem with Empire TW. Nobody ever tried to invade England, even if lightly defended.

  • Agreed

  • that just gave me a orgasum

  • orgasim*

  • @ZeroPresicion Orgasm*

  • @Tewkii lol idiots.

  • lol I got the NTW Imperial Edition (it comes with 15 new units, can be used online and offline) lol I was like OMG "YES!!" ive got it wooo, BUT lol ITS A VERY "BIG" GAME!!! wow 18GB!!! (lol I think it was that anyway... :s )

  • Is a great game BUT is not worth $40 or $50

  • @GameArmada

    I got mine for £17 Pre ordered.

  • Well thats you. I have only Steam and GameStop and both sell for the same price so no deals like that for me.

  • @creepybacon

    Fk off

    I know its true and i know my History thank you very Much

    A matter of fact i have Finished my History Courses

  • @MrMobsterking lol. your dumb. creepybacon is right.

  • @creepybacon, I agree with you, but japan was a british and american ally in the first world war...

    but yeah basically the british had crippled the german air force (and thus turned the war in favour of the allies).

  • Does anybody know if this game or Empire TW supports Nvidia SLI?

  • both

  • it does

  • Yes... the end turns will be long... for old computers.

  • If you have both Empire and Napoleon can you use and upgrade to Napoleonic units in the Empire game mode?

  • well all i know is that British lost the war against America, and the south states lost against the north states, and America lost against Vietnam. Reasons: i don't care. :P i'm just sayin'

  • @FreakyShow95 America lost Vietnam? hmmm, let's reconsider this.

    Vietnamese(North):1,000,000+ dead, 600,000 wounded

    US:>60,000 dead, 300,000 wounded.....

    Number of Vietnamese military bases in the US:0

    Number of US military bases in Vietnam:29

    I believe Vietnam still owes us money too.....Sure as hell doesn't seem like we lost.

  • @VictoryOrganized

    1- Video about Napoleon TW... nobody take care of your country... Come here to speak about your country (even if nobody take care) where the USA will be playable.

    2- You left Vietnam, you lost 60.000 soldiers, and Vietnam is still a communist country today... you lost Vietnam...

  • @VictoryOrganized they failed their mission and thats losing

  • @FreakyShow95 Wasn't a proper war. look at the troop numbers in every British conflict :P the Brits weren't trying, do you want to know why? because the British had a much more valueable resource system coming from India in the form of Spices and Jewelry. America had it's coal and iron quarries. But the people incharge of Britain saw the inevitable friendship between Britain and America. Because we are literally brothers and sisters and cousins.

    :D

  • @LolFishFail if you call it that way, all i know is that King Geroge went mad and i mean mad, after losing America, so much for not trying? and it is proven that he went mad, wich mean yes they were trying to hold America. i wish they won the war anyways... :O

  • @LolFishFail It was practically a civil war all on its own.

  • fuck i cant wait to play this game. i love Rome Total War

  • @dylan1487 Rome was the best

  • @838millionman I know right. I still play it :)

  • @dylan1487 Same here. Online is still fun.

  • @838millionman I have never played online :(

  • @dylan1487 sooo unrelated

  • In the Way That

    we have always helped each other when Push comes to Shove so Grow up

  • I am british @Brutus you talk crap

    Now i am First to admit i don't Really Like Americans because of there Smarmy Cockyness But you got to admit even though it took ages to get them out to help they came to the Aid of us on both WW1 + WW2

    they didn't have too

    Now we are Paying them back by being in Afghanistan

    America are Basically British we started life over there and then Some americans were born there and then we have grew together as Countries we might not be United but we are

  • @MrMobsterking Learn your history will you? The Americans got involved because the British tipped them off about Germany forming alliances with Mexico and Japan to strike America while they carried on their campaign in Europe.

    Britain had already defeated the german invasion on there country by this point and that was the turning point of the war. Don't think they did it out of the kindness of their heart it was to save there own ass.

  • if it wasnt for us ww2 would have turned out much diffrently

  • in the vietnam war, the americans won just about every major engagement and they lost because it was unpopular and there was no interest in it

  • It was unpopular because you weren't winning champ ;)

  • -_- ok um i believe the military and the government said they were winning the war(untill near the end of course), and the media showed how bad it was over there.

    but on the reall subject, cant wait till this game comes out i get it tommorow

  • @BUFFTHEDOCTOR it was a war of politics....

  • @BUFFTHEDOCTOR Rubbish, the main part of the war was like cat and mouse play, the Vietnamese hide in the forest and among the civilian, setting trap and making ambush while the American dropped bombs everywhere and hope it catched them. Such thing like major engagement almost never occurs because "if both go full force against each other, Vietnamese army would be wiped out in 2 hours" ( quoted from a Vietnamese general). American lost because they fought against not an army but a whole country.

  • @BUFFTHEDOCTOR whats that got to do with the Napoleonic era

  • @BUFFTHEDOCTOR they lost it cause they got owned.

  • if anyone thinks that napoleon and hitler shared a similiar idealogy, then they are just ignorant

  • 1:55 c'est ça la campagne d'Égypte... ?

    Damn jokes about Napoleon..

    He was a general and an emperor and yes, emperors and generals do "wars" and by this way.. kill people... All generals and war leaders wasn't like hitler, but all of them weren't genius about politic, strategy and country modernisation.

  • On QI, Stephen Fry said that it has been proven that nearly all online debates/arguements result in the mentioning of Hitler/Nazis. You know it's true if it's on QI!

  • When is this released ?

  • @ Gash 1234 I dought that but man that was funny maid my day. "Napoleon Raped a Dog in the Desert". Funny. He was a great man and strategist.

  • saddly my history classes barley said anything about Napoleon, i read up on him in my spare time though great man.

    i just hope one day i can get a desktop than can run this thing at max with no lag

  • some people need to read the book again of history of napoleon bonaparte Napoleon was not evil like Hitler damn people he was not a rasict like hitler he didnt extrerminate any race please people read the books again

  • Napoleon is nothing like Hitler, Napoleon United France and brought peace to a country that has been unstable for more than 10 years and deafeted the countries that declared war on france to stop its democratic ideals.Unlike Hitler, Napoleon himself was a brilliant strategist at artillery, while hitler made constant, costly military mistakes like Invading Russia(by the way Napoleon fell from power for invading russia,the continental system he imposed and the invasion of spain).

  • @Darrencirque

    Hitler thought himself a military genius after the Battle of France in May-June 1940, even though he was clearly a maniac. Opening up a second front on the Soviet Union=fail.

    To say someone with the military genius and intellect of Napoleon invaded Russia purely for conquest is an insult to common sense. The Russian court was howling for war and prodding Tsar Alexander to defeat the "Anti-Christ" Napoleon.

  • nah he just wanted to have power...

  • "Conquered most of Europe in a short period of time. Downfall was invading Russia. "

    See, I know you know almost nothing about the Napoleonic Era when all you mention is the invasion of Russia, and none of the Coalition wars. Napoleon was always attacked, not the other way around. Hitler intentionally attacked Poland, Scandinavia, Western Europe. He killed because he wanted to. Napoleon killed because he was forced to by reactionary European monarchs.

  • Looks like they took Empires bland engine and really perfected it, i plan on preordering tommorow :D

  • SEGA / Creative Assembly are full of shit. They can create the best and most user-friendly games yet they have to shoot themselves on the foot all the time.

  • Yeah Gay ass pc and you are crying coz it will never be for your gameboy (or whatever fag console you use)

  • St Helena. Read your Wikipedia!

  • Screen shakes and everyone gets killed.

  • Napoleon had a lot in common with Hitler except he lived 6 extra years to bend history to his liking. Hitler never had that chance.

  • Really? I'm sure you can give a few examples to this?

  • Was a dictator who rose from power from lowly status. Was not a national of the country he later ruled. Bent on European as well had dreams of Global conquest. Conquered most of Europe in a short period of time. Downfall was invading Russia. Shall I go on?

  • "Bent on European as well had dreams of Global conquest. "

    No, he wanted to unite a Europe that had been destroyed by revolutions and wars. Unlike Hitler, who wanted to exterminate entire peoples, Napoleon wanted to unify those people into a common European political system. French was already the dominant language of Europe at that time. Europe had progressed considerably, both in the enforcement of the blockade and the unification of currencies, weights, and measures, and legislation.

  • Also:

    "Napoleon proclaimed the Emancipation of the Jews in the Italian states, and the majority of the Jews in Italy hailed Napoleon as a liberator and political savior"

    "In Palestine, Napoleon issued a manifesto that promised the Jews their return to their country, and therefore anticipated the creation of the state of Israel."

    "When the French entered Berlin, Napoleon asked: 'Where are the Jews?' He removed them from the ghetto and made them fully-fledged citizens."

    Really like Hitler, right?

  • I recommend Napoleon and Hitler: A Comparative Biography by Desmond Seward. Napoleon was demonized as much as Hitler when he was sent off to St Helena. But he had 6 years to give his side of the story there. Hitler didn't have that luxury. And there is more to Hitler than Jew Hating (although that's a good part of his character)

  • I have read it, and while it is an interesting analysis, I still do not believe Napoleon was as evil as Hitler was. Hitler was personally responsible for 40 million deaths. He willingly attacked most of Europe. Napoleon was forced by European monarchs who would put down the "democratic plague" that was France to wage war.

    I must ask though: do you know of ANY of Napoleon's campaigns that isn't Russia, Waterloo, or Trafalgar?

  • The first one in wich he was defeated: Spain, even if we felt too.

  • Aside from all the ridiculous "similar" things between them, there is one glaring difference.

    Hitler wanted to destroy entire cultures. He wanted to prove that the German Aryan Race was destined to dominate Europe and exterminate the Eastern Europeans or make them as serfs.

    Napoleon did not want to exterminate any race, he did not want to prove the French were a superior race. He wanted to spread the ideals of the Revolution to the Continent and make a united, democratic, federal Europe.

  • What kind of history class did YOU go through?

  • Napoleon fucked many chicks. Hope they show it it 3D detail.

  • Repent!! There is still time to abandon your console ways and embrace the true way of wisdom, the PC.

  • And Americans lost the War of 1812, Vietnam , Bay of Pigs, Alamo, Little Big Horn , Pearl Harbor., In the south your whole civilization burned to ashes by the Yankees. (Guess you beat yourself there) List goes on and on...

  • didnt USA won vietnam war?

  • You're kidding right?

  • do i look liek im fucking kidding, im just asking? O.o

  • You look like text in an e-mail actually. The US got their ass handed to them in Vietnam to answer your question.

  • @blacbraun Actually no, the US was doing really well...its just the war was so unpopular we didn't end up finishing the fight....given that it didn't seem to be giving good returns. But I'm not going to get into a debate on youtube. I hate those.

  • @blacbraun No, you are incorrect there. We were defeated in Vietnam politically. To say that we were defeated militarily is simply foolish.

  • That's like saying the British didn't lose the American War of Independence, they were just defeated politically. You lost and gave up and N Vietnam one by uniting the south under their rule. ADMIT IT! American's can't ever admit they lost. It's impossible.

  • @blacbraun The British did lose the war because of politics too. They still could have whooped our asses if they had used their still mighty army, but they saw that if they let us have our independence, then they could control us economically. I admit that we lost, but I'm saying that we would have won if it wasn't for the goddamn hippies back home.

  • Coulda , Woulda , Shoulda. Point is, they gave up! They lost because they gave up!. You lost Vietnam because you GAVE UP! Geeze like I said above , can't admit defeat. Even Southerners can't admit they lost the Civil War!!

  • @blacbraun I admit we lost, that's said and done. I'm just telling you why we lost which you seem to oversimplify by saying we just lost hands down. I would hope you would actually look at the reasons why wars are won and lost. We lost vietnam because political interest was to pull out. The South lost the Civil War because the North was able to manufacture weapons for the Union and the south was not. Britain lost because they did not have political nor economic support to continue the war.

  • Im American, but i can admit it, we don't know how to admit we lost wars. Yes, southerners are bitches and cant admit they lost the civil war and they say northerners fired the first shot and even some books say the southerners DID win the civil war. And yes, Vietnam was a loss for us big time. But who the fuck cares, i know that Brutus is being a prick but just ignore him and have a nice day.

  • @need242 hey!!!! if you dont like it, well you can geeeeeeeeeeeeeeiiiiiiiiiiiiiii­iiiiiiiiiiittttt out

  • Alright..wasnt even talking about the game so you can geeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeiiiiiiii­iiiiiiiiiiiiiiitttttttt out.