this dances with arms and stuff like 0:45 are completely unnecessary. Pianists who do that try to convey the idea that there's some kind of refined power in music flowing and SNOOOOORE >:/
Ahh. Listening to this reminds me of when i used to play this song when i was 11 in piano class.....(a beginner versions ofcourse!) *sigh*........good times.
I don't see why people have to complain about lack of 'spirit'. A piece is at its best when an artist plays it so we can hear the music, rather than disorienting the sound through an emotional interpretation
@giblspoink I suppose some people think music is somehow tied to the original author, and players have a responsibility to play exactly the way the author played it. But really then all you have is a bunch of monkeys, or parrots, mimicking. I think if it's at all possible, a player should own the piece they are playing. That way the piece is liberated, rather than bound by preconception.
Good God. I thought the other posters were just being snooty before I heard the performance, but they're right - this piece is technically flawless but utterly without spirit.
brilliant techique , no feeling , althought something sends a shiver down my spine , the crude reallity when someone can play a song in such a disgusting mechanical manner . sorry kid .
Brilliant technique without any comprehension. No understanding of the real macabre as conceived by Liszt and Horowitz. But the clearness is really jawdropping... as if he had really practised it as an étude.
The lyrical fragment at 3:33-4:04 is spoiled... there is no miracle at 5:05-5:15. Why does Sultanov’s version make me let out a tear whereas this one make me irritated? Because it is vicious practice—to gain perfection at the cost of the loss of complete understanding.
@newgeorge Well actually it's the Horowitz-Liszt arrangement, but it's Horowitz's arrangement of Liszt's arrangement of the original composition by Saint-Saëns. You get the idea.
The problem isn't with the speakers - mine are fine actually, as I am listening to this via my connected Sony Home Theater system. The problem is with the interpretation of the piece. This is the stiffest performance of this piece I've ever heard. It might as well be a cheap dime-store player piano for all I care. Blah!
A reminder to those who belly-ached about the piano. We're listening to a PAPER DIAPHRAM, people, NOT a piano. The video quality is poor, and we make allowances for that. Why should you think the speakers in your computer, and the electronics which run them, are doing any better job as a stand-in for a grand piano?
franz liszt fue el mejor pianista de todos los tiempos increible lo que se puede hacer con el piano y el lo recorria de punta a punta a increible velocidad este pianista lo describe tal cual tocaria liszt en su epoca pienso yo un genio
Liszt was a genius!!!! Imagine how he must have performed this!!!!
Outstanding performance in my opinion by Tae Hyung Kim. Some would say it should be played slower, but Liszt was a rule breaker, so I think he would be fine with it.
Were there only ten people in the audience? I can't believe the pitiful applause this incredible performance received.
@lingk100 Right, but the title clarifies it better for people who wanted to hear the piano arrangement by Liszt, not the original orchestration by Saint-Saëns.
What's all this about the piano? I mean, I've played on Steinway's that sound like shit, and Yamahas that sound awesome. It's no C. Bechstein from 1926 with real ivory keys, but this is one hell of a piano anyway. Yamahas tend to have a slightly brighter sound than for example a Kawai or Steinway, but I like that.
It's funny to see people saying the piano is horrible, and things like that. But i can bet most of you guys don't have a fuckin' cent to get even close to one of these.
@wmguitarjam How do you mean, the fact that I can't afford a Hummer, doesn't mean I can't say I don't like the car :p But I agree with you, people shouldn't focus on the piano, but on the pianist :p
No doubt, great pianist. piano qualiy...difficult to judge.
Personally I prefer the original Horowitz rec of 1942 which approaches more sophisticated imho. e.g.: 4:42 this passage shows the technical border of this pianist, he slows down when Horowitz (also Volodos) keep holding tempo. I'm not against rubato, but in this single case it's not appropriate. Don't get me wrong, I don't want to minimize his interpret. but doesn't proof ambivalent critcs admiration because of more interest?
He is Tae Hyung Kim from South Korea. In 2008, he played this and passed the preliminary of the Seoul National Music Competition. He won a prize in the competition at the age of 24.
Why isn't his name here? He's all fingers and techno, with no feeling or rhythm.
MultiGypsy22 5 days ago
Who is this playing?
MultiGypsy22 5 days ago
this dances with arms and stuff like 0:45 are completely unnecessary. Pianists who do that try to convey the idea that there's some kind of refined power in music flowing and SNOOOOORE >:/
henrybat 1 week ago
Ahh. Listening to this reminds me of when i used to play this song when i was 11 in piano class.....(a beginner versions ofcourse!) *sigh*........good times.
MadmanSam14 2 weeks ago
What does that mean, "lack of spirit"? Does he have to burst in tears to show spirit? The same thing was said of Heifetz, utter nonsense.
SierraNeef 2 weeks ago
mindblowing!
borkenek13 1 month ago
The only part I can play is... None. I'll never be as awesome as this.
biancasp 1 month ago
Thumbs up if you lost your shit at 0:44!
WolfySnackrib666 1 month ago 2
i wish the name of the pianist was included in the title.now I have to trawl through...SEVEN pages of comments looking for it...!!!
joecapaldi 1 month ago
I don't see why people have to complain about lack of 'spirit'. A piece is at its best when an artist plays it so we can hear the music, rather than disorienting the sound through an emotional interpretation
giblspoink 1 month ago
@giblspoink I suppose some people think music is somehow tied to the original author, and players have a responsibility to play exactly the way the author played it. But really then all you have is a bunch of monkeys, or parrots, mimicking. I think if it's at all possible, a player should own the piece they are playing. That way the piece is liberated, rather than bound by preconception.
frankbraker 1 month ago
@frankbraker You are absolutely rigth. That's why modern day musicians can't compare to the ones from the 50's or so...
SierraNeef 2 weeks ago
Good God. I thought the other posters were just being snooty before I heard the performance, but they're right - this piece is technically flawless but utterly without spirit.
rpundurs 1 month ago
brilliant techique , no feeling , althought something sends a shiver down my spine , the crude reallity when someone can play a song in such a disgusting mechanical manner . sorry kid .
HinataloveNaruto94 1 month ago
Brilliant technique without any comprehension. No understanding of the real macabre as conceived by Liszt and Horowitz. But the clearness is really jawdropping... as if he had really practised it as an étude.
The lyrical fragment at 3:33-4:04 is spoiled... there is no miracle at 5:05-5:15. Why does Sultanov’s version make me let out a tear whereas this one make me irritated? Because it is vicious practice—to gain perfection at the cost of the loss of complete understanding.
f1f1s 1 month ago 2
WHO IS THIS KID???
lecomtedemaldoror 1 month ago
Didn't know Horowitz was Asian...
platon1988 1 month ago
This is so wondefully insane! How many finger does he have?
fernablu 2 months ago
Meh...
LordNazgulKing 2 months ago
OPE! and there we go. Franz Liszt: mephisto waltz. is that a joke? on me? on you? i donno.
funk45750 2 months ago
I came here for the Horowitz.....but...stayed for the asian with the good hand.
haha no i keeed i keeed. extra medication today (for it's the reason for the season.)
but anyways vladimir horowitz, isn't that the most russian-jewish name you've Ever heard?
hahah no. but i clicked randomly; when i saw the macabre. then the dance. then the piano. and i do love this death piano... death metal. death piano.
maybe i'll look for more vladowitz in the future... AND NOW to random Franz Liszt..
funk45750 2 months ago
I came here for Horowitz.....but...not bad
imsohornynwet 2 months ago
this piece is nothing without the violin playing too
KatAttack61 2 months ago
Perfection!
needmorebeads 2 months ago
of course he's not Horowitz, i believe he's Tae-Hyung Kim. He is awesome. great performance
vicduriechstsogut 2 months ago 2
The only part I can play is the first 5 secondes...;)
QueenManiac1618 2 months ago 21
Horowitz?Tae Hyung Kim... perhaps
volasemprealto 3 months ago
what ever you can do, some asian kid can do better
mdicecco302 3 months ago 38
@mdicecco302 hahahah that was epic ..
purpLeXaZze 3 months ago
@mdicecco302 Except for sex lololol
plungerdrum 2 months ago 2
Comment removed
hogo1 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mdicecco302
like landing on the moon? or inventing the computer? things like that?
hogo1 1 month ago
@mdicecco302 and probably cheaper too! lol
DreamsCumTrue469 1 month ago
@mdicecco302 Except for pronouncing the letter 'R'
Damnedfaith 1 month ago
@mdicecco302 but can they COMPOSE it???? i'm still waiting for an Asian Beethoven, or even a lesser one than that....i'm not going to hold my breath.
cirosuperiore 1 month ago
@mdicecco302 u mad bro?
AntoinetteNoir 3 weeks ago
@mdicecco302 unless you are in fact asian yourself.
Rezendes 2 weeks ago
best performance Ive heard on youtube, excellent!
kowalityjesus 3 months ago
7:07 à 7:15 il va plus vite que la musique ;)
PierreAlexandreRavet 3 months ago
If thats Horovitz then I'm Abraham Lincoln,
newgeorge 3 months ago 3
@newgeorge It's not Horowitz, it's Horowitz's arrangement of Danse Macabre though.
burningled 3 months ago 3
@burningled ok I understand now :)
newgeorge 3 months ago
@newgeorge Well actually it's the Horowitz-Liszt arrangement, but it's Horowitz's arrangement of Liszt's arrangement of the original composition by Saint-Saëns. You get the idea.
burningled 3 months ago 6
Comment removed
moonlightdriver800 3 months ago
damnnn this is the best version i ve listened :O
aaortegafa 3 months ago
How old is Horowitz here????
mandraque2233 4 months ago
@mandraque2233 I hope it's a joke right? :p
StefanInvAsian 3 months ago
The problem isn't with the speakers - mine are fine actually, as I am listening to this via my connected Sony Home Theater system. The problem is with the interpretation of the piece. This is the stiffest performance of this piece I've ever heard. It might as well be a cheap dime-store player piano for all I care. Blah!
joelchummel 4 months ago
A reminder to those who belly-ached about the piano. We're listening to a PAPER DIAPHRAM, people, NOT a piano. The video quality is poor, and we make allowances for that. Why should you think the speakers in your computer, and the electronics which run them, are doing any better job as a stand-in for a grand piano?
Offshoreorganbuilder 5 months ago 2
Genius!
Naessly 5 months ago
Hmm, this sounds more like Horowitz's version, not Liszt's one. Anyway, great playing :)
girgiii 6 months ago
Comment removed
girgiii 6 months ago
Comment removed
girgiii 6 months ago
Comment removed
kannibalghost 7 months ago
O.O fantastic!!!
glo91thebest 7 months ago
Hey he has Lang Lang matched or went beyond him without a doubt..
Pianoantics 7 months ago
franz liszt fue el mejor pianista de todos los tiempos increible lo que se puede hacer con el piano y el lo recorria de punta a punta a increible velocidad este pianista lo describe tal cual tocaria liszt en su epoca pienso yo un genio
6168gigo 9 months ago
Liszt was a genius!!!! Imagine how he must have performed this!!!!
Outstanding performance in my opinion by Tae Hyung Kim. Some would say it should be played slower, but Liszt was a rule breaker, so I think he would be fine with it.
Were there only ten people in the audience? I can't believe the pitiful applause this incredible performance received.
DKSchmerber 10 months ago
this is not liszt´s danse macabre, it is saint saens, the original version is for violin and orchestra, liszt has just transcribed for piano solo
lingk100 1 year ago
@lingk100
asi es!!
angellbf2 11 months ago
@lingk100 Right, but the title clarifies it better for people who wanted to hear the piano arrangement by Liszt, not the original orchestration by Saint-Saëns.
burningled 3 months ago
2:41 blows my goddamn mind.
pascalyuiop 1 year ago
Lang Lang playing?
vendettor9 1 year ago
Why is Liszt's name printed here as "Franz von Liszt"? "von" would have indicated nobility under rule of monarchy, which Liszt was not.
richterkleiber 1 year ago
Forget about the piano, he's awesome!
TurboKlopper 1 year ago
PLAYED WELL BUT WITHOUT EMOTION TO ROBOTIC
duku345 1 year ago
@duku345 How do you mean 'without emotion'? Do you mean no facial expression or what? Because I don't really understand what you're meaning...
StefanInvAsian 1 year ago
@duku345 WHAT!?
Offshoreorganbuilder 5 months ago
@Offshoreorganbuilder haha, i second that
robchopper87 5 months ago
@duku345 The only reason it seems robotic to you was because he interpreted it differently.
651555666 4 months ago
Does anyone know the difference between the transcription of liszt and horowitz? :O is it the same?
Luchetafight 1 year ago
What's all this about the piano? I mean, I've played on Steinway's that sound like shit, and Yamahas that sound awesome. It's no C. Bechstein from 1926 with real ivory keys, but this is one hell of a piano anyway. Yamahas tend to have a slightly brighter sound than for example a Kawai or Steinway, but I like that.
catpenis27 1 year ago
such a weak applause for such a great performance
evalongorialover 1 year ago
So fucking amazing.
Jointjo 1 year ago
Comment removed
JohnBarbedWire 1 year ago
It's funny to see people saying the piano is horrible, and things like that. But i can bet most of you guys don't have a fuckin' cent to get even close to one of these.
wmguitarjam 1 year ago
@wmguitarjam How do you mean, the fact that I can't afford a Hummer, doesn't mean I can't say I don't like the car :p But I agree with you, people shouldn't focus on the piano, but on the pianist :p
StefanInvAsian 1 year ago
caraca!!!!!!!!!!!
Hrazi545 1 year ago
No doubt, great pianist. piano qualiy...difficult to judge.
Personally I prefer the original Horowitz rec of 1942 which approaches more sophisticated imho. e.g.: 4:42 this passage shows the technical border of this pianist, he slows down when Horowitz (also Volodos) keep holding tempo. I'm not against rubato, but in this single case it's not appropriate. Don't get me wrong, I don't want to minimize his interpret. but doesn't proof ambivalent critcs admiration because of more interest?
ginkidasnuesschen 1 year ago
YAMAH piano is horrible......
lovingallison 1 year ago
@lovingallison not horrible, but definetly meh
Winterbyte 1 year ago
nice playing, bad piano
theromanpraetorian 1 year ago
@theromanpraetorian I don't think it's the piano which is bad, but more the recording. It's always hard to tell in these video's
MrMgriend 1 year ago
And this version is Horowitz's one not Liszt. (Liszt arranged Saint Saens's work and after then Horowitz re-arranged Liszt's one)
dgcoocoo 2 years ago
@dgcoocoo yes, mores the pity. why the hell didn't Horovitz leave his clunking hands off it. Liszt knew what he was doing.
jegspillerpiano 1 year ago
He is Tae Hyung Kim from South Korea. In 2008, he played this and passed the preliminary of the Seoul National Music Competition. He won a prize in the competition at the age of 24.
dgcoocoo 2 years ago
!!!!!!!!cool
Hippowitz 2 years ago
this is awesome
who is he
happydai2005 2 years ago
WOW! Great performance. This video has inspired me to try to learn this!
ianscott111 2 years ago
What's the name of this pianist?
Where did he play?
And when?
:o
mllevinet 2 years ago 2
Liszt is a real genious, this pianist is an awesome performer with much technique!
To my mind, it's a really great performance. I like this tempo.
mllevinet 2 years ago
he's playing it allgerettissimo...it has to be much slower
shervman 2 years ago
The sound quality is not good. :-( But great performance, though. ;-) Who is this?
ji94552 2 years ago