Added: 4 years ago
From: cb3815
Views: 72,748
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (60)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Божественно! Ещё раз убеждаешься, что рояль под пальцами гениального пианиста может всё ! Воистину, рояль- король всех инструментов ! Божественно! Divinely! You are once again convinced that the grand piano under fingers of the ingenious pianist can all! Truly, a grand piano - the king of all instruments!

  • 自然な流れでピアノが生き生きしている。なかなかブーニンのよう­に弾こうと思っても弾けない。

  • ORTHODOX?? Art wouldn't exist if artists were to worry about being 'unorthodox'!

  • These are not orthodox interpretations but they are the emotions of a complete musician who is totally immersed in his independent vision. Kudos! He's not a clone. He thinks and recreates for himself, in the moment. A genius.

  • E QUESTO SAREBBE IL NIPOTE DEL GRANDE HEINRICH NEUHAUS ??????? SUO NONNO STA GRIDANDO DI DOLORE DALLA TOMBA !!!!!!!

  • In Russia sono nati e sono cresciuti sempre tanti artisti, compositori e interpreti di altissima qualità. Anche tra i più giovani, molti sono pianisti eccezionali. Se ascolto Stanislav Bunin ho la stessa l'impressione che sentivo con Alexis Weissemberg ! Martellare così con Debussy, tanto egocentrismo e narcisismo, una tale cattiveria, senza un minimo di suono vellutato, un legato mediocre. Esecuzione sbrigativa e riduttiva !!! Neanche fosse nelle peggiori serate !!!!!

  • キレがあるのに繊細で美しい。。。

  • I get the impression from these performances that Bunin could produce a really wonderful L'Isle Joyeuse

  • I too am very confused by the thumbs up at 1:31 , maybe it's a secret code? But i think it's an awesome performance!

  • @juliburton

    it's not the thumbs up, he just rise his left hand, and that's all....

  • @ffiva You're right, it is just him lifting his hand now that I see it again.

  • so beautiful....listening to this makes me what to practice hard....so touching

  • What was the thumbs up at 1:31 for?

  • @christian502 He does it a few times throughout the piece. I believe that is just that shape his hands make after pressuring his little finger, then pulling his hands of the keys. my hands do almost that same.

  • Ok where the fuck is video url ?

  • @RavenholmHunter click share

  • sublime.

    thanks

  • beautiful

  • OMG the soud went I cant hear enything

  • I just saw All About Lily Chou-chou, which brought me to search for Debussy. Great music!

  • Comment removed

  • shut it, you blaggard

  • Comment removed

  • When weird playing, i always ask myself: Would Debussy himself like this? In fact he might have found his playing an interesting sound or way of playing his pieces. This pianist is good. He might need to look in different epoques of music

  • who says so? you're not in the position to decide what is out of style for any composer

  • šumne

  • 多少独善的に聴こえます。

  • yes

  • Why so?

  • liberace bleongs to a different genre altogether. He is more of a show-man, and although he plays well, he doesn't show the same extreme presicion that you can see in this piece. Playing as subtly as he does in the arabesque requires a lot of skill and control to make it grow into a whole piece like this.

    This doesn't mean that liberace ain't a good player. He would kick this guy's ass in show-music, but this guy would kick liberace's ass in classical.

  • I agree they are different genres, yet I still argue that Liberace could play this EXACTLY as Stanislav does, key for key, emotion for emotion. Now; the big question, is the opposite true? Can Stanislav do what Liberace can do? Play a 1/16 boogie woogie for example, I think not. I think mechanically Liberace is the better player; and I further; the better overall entertainer. Isn't the point of music to entertain us? Surely if Liberace wins in his overall ability to entertain, he wins....

  • The point of some music is to entertain. Music overall is a form of artistic expression. To conflate it with trivial entertainment, wherein all value is calculated upon whether the music entertains the listener, is an insult to musicians and composers. Music is much deeper than that.

  • Thats brillant... Is this something you just made up or is a saying?? Its great Beautiful

  • I take back part of my last statement, the 1/16 part. Obviously Stan is capable of doing it. But, I would still challenge the notion of a "speed" competition between the 2. I've got my money on Liberace, playing without looking, making his hands fly 2 feet above the piano.. to exactly, precisely where they should be in time. Though I take nothing away from Stanislave; he is no doubt great; Ask around a little bit, who knows Liberace? Who knows Stanislav? And why?

  • I like what he done with it, never heard anything like it.

  • so touching...

    best and great style

  • At least he put some emotion in it. Something most performers miss. This is a very passionate peice that is meant to sweep you away.

  • Okay, he plays well, but a touch too much rubato in the Arabesque, and the Tarantella (also called "Danse") is much too fast in the outer sections. I also heard some wrong notes in the Danse.

  • very impressive

  • Very nice...cp

  • fantastic!

  • The arabesque is lovely, but the tarantelle styrienne should'nt be so fast and so staccato. And there are some false notes.

  • Weird - I thought the arabesque (at least initially) was exactly that: a bit too fast and staccato? Excellant dynamic control and lovely interpretation and feel overall though (arabesque)?

  • wrong, it was the tarantelle styrienne that he thought was too fast and staccato

  • ...erm...yes I know sunshine, I can read: I'm saying I thought this rendition of the arabesque was that to so erm, wrong...I suggest you put new batteries in, switch yourself on, go back, pay attention and re-read what I've actually stated above he he! ;-)) (You may just not understand English well enough or something, I don't know...not being funny or anything.) ;-))

  • lol. because you put the symbol : instead of ; after the word THAT on the first sentence, which may explain your first statement.

  • Oh no here we go - the English language police strike on YouTube! ;-P Thanks for the rather pedantic lesson on how to puntuate within my OWN mother tongue! ;-))

    I used the colon exactly as I intended it there, which was to imply a statement; if I'd have used a semicolon like I've just done here, it wouldn't have been appropriate and THEN wouldn't have made proper sense.

    ;-))

  • "Weird - I thought the arabesque (at least initially) was exactly that: a bit too fast and staccato?"

    lol, you think the arabesque was too fast and staccato?

  • Hey is there anything else you'd like to try and teach me? Maybe the rules of cricket? How to cook eggs, bacon and sausages? How to stand in queues patiently without complaining etc etc? Oh yeah! Hey there's also sarcasm as well. I don't know, I might need to brush up on that one to. What do you think Sir? Any pointers as you're seemingly on a roll?) ;-))

  • now you just gave me a negative impression how of bad english attitude can be! admit it, you used a wrong punctuation mark. who cares if English is your mother tongue. Punctuation marks are used not only in that language dumbhead!

  • Wow. He plays with feeling.

  • True understanding of Debussy's impressionism.

  • believe it or not, this is the first performance that brought me to tears! and i like the tarantelle as well

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more