Божественно! Ещё раз убеждаешься, что рояль под пальцами гениального пианиста может всё ! Воистину, рояль- король всех инструментов ! Божественно! Divinely! You are once again convinced that the grand piano under fingers of the ingenious pianist can all! Truly, a grand piano - the king of all instruments!
These are not orthodox interpretations but they are the emotions of a complete musician who is totally immersed in his independent vision. Kudos! He's not a clone. He thinks and recreates for himself, in the moment. A genius.
In Russia sono nati e sono cresciuti sempre tanti artisti, compositori e interpreti di altissima qualità. Anche tra i più giovani, molti sono pianisti eccezionali. Se ascolto Stanislav Bunin ho la stessa l'impressione che sentivo con Alexis Weissemberg ! Martellare così con Debussy, tanto egocentrismo e narcisismo, una tale cattiveria, senza un minimo di suono vellutato, un legato mediocre. Esecuzione sbrigativa e riduttiva !!! Neanche fosse nelle peggiori serate !!!!!
@christian502 He does it a few times throughout the piece. I believe that is just that shape his hands make after pressuring his little finger, then pulling his hands of the keys. my hands do almost that same.
When weird playing, i always ask myself: Would Debussy himself like this? In fact he might have found his playing an interesting sound or way of playing his pieces. This pianist is good. He might need to look in different epoques of music
liberace bleongs to a different genre altogether. He is more of a show-man, and although he plays well, he doesn't show the same extreme presicion that you can see in this piece. Playing as subtly as he does in the arabesque requires a lot of skill and control to make it grow into a whole piece like this.
This doesn't mean that liberace ain't a good player. He would kick this guy's ass in show-music, but this guy would kick liberace's ass in classical.
I agree they are different genres, yet I still argue that Liberace could play this EXACTLY as Stanislav does, key for key, emotion for emotion. Now; the big question, is the opposite true? Can Stanislav do what Liberace can do? Play a 1/16 boogie woogie for example, I think not. I think mechanically Liberace is the better player; and I further; the better overall entertainer. Isn't the point of music to entertain us? Surely if Liberace wins in his overall ability to entertain, he wins....
The point of some music is to entertain. Music overall is a form of artistic expression. To conflate it with trivial entertainment, wherein all value is calculated upon whether the music entertains the listener, is an insult to musicians and composers. Music is much deeper than that.
I take back part of my last statement, the 1/16 part. Obviously Stan is capable of doing it. But, I would still challenge the notion of a "speed" competition between the 2. I've got my money on Liberace, playing without looking, making his hands fly 2 feet above the piano.. to exactly, precisely where they should be in time. Though I take nothing away from Stanislave; he is no doubt great; Ask around a little bit, who knows Liberace? Who knows Stanislav? And why?
Okay, he plays well, but a touch too much rubato in the Arabesque, and the Tarantella (also called "Danse") is much too fast in the outer sections. I also heard some wrong notes in the Danse.
Weird - I thought the arabesque (at least initially) was exactly that: a bit too fast and staccato? Excellant dynamic control and lovely interpretation and feel overall though (arabesque)?
...erm...yes I know sunshine, I can read: I'm saying I thought this rendition of the arabesque was that to so erm, wrong...I suggest you put new batteries in, switch yourself on, go back, pay attention and re-read what I've actually stated above he he! ;-)) (You may just not understand English well enough or something, I don't know...not being funny or anything.) ;-))
Oh no here we go - the English language police strike on YouTube! ;-P Thanks for the rather pedantic lesson on how to puntuate within my OWN mother tongue! ;-))
I used the colon exactly as I intended it there, which was to imply a statement; if I'd have used a semicolon like I've just done here, it wouldn't have been appropriate and THEN wouldn't have made proper sense.
Hey is there anything else you'd like to try and teach me? Maybe the rules of cricket? How to cook eggs, bacon and sausages? How to stand in queues patiently without complaining etc etc? Oh yeah! Hey there's also sarcasm as well. I don't know, I might need to brush up on that one to. What do you think Sir? Any pointers as you're seemingly on a roll?) ;-))
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
RALMFAO! ;-)) What? A little, midget 20 yr old needle-dick Philiphino kid HA HARRGGHH?! Orr what! Thanks! That's brightened my day up that no end boy ha harrgghh lol! ;-)) I REALLY don't fucking think so somehow lad! In your wildest, wet little dreams boy, in your dreams LMFAOOL! You wouldn't know one end of a woman's body to the other you little prick, now fuck off LMFAO! ;-))
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
God - you're like a turd that won't flush you aren't you Burlington Bertie?! :-O No, YOU attacked ME with INAPPROPRIATE USE of punctuation marks shit-for-brains (a little bit pedantic to say the least!), THEN made immature (and uncivilized) assertions about the sexual prowess of your dreams - now THAT, is what I'd call INSECURE bollocks brains! Let that be the end of it - I'm bored with you now and have had my moment of fun with you he he! ;-))
now you just gave me a negative impression how of bad english attitude can be! admit it, you used a wrong punctuation mark. who cares if English is your mother tongue. Punctuation marks are used not only in that language dumbhead!
Божественно! Ещё раз убеждаешься, что рояль под пальцами гениального пианиста может всё ! Воистину, рояль- король всех инструментов ! Божественно! Divinely! You are once again convinced that the grand piano under fingers of the ingenious pianist can all! Truly, a grand piano - the king of all instruments!
777ViolettaAngelo 1 month ago
自然な流れでピアノが生き生きしている。なかなかブーニンのように弾こうと思っても弾けない。
midlton88 2 months ago
ORTHODOX?? Art wouldn't exist if artists were to worry about being 'unorthodox'!
marcohorowitz8 3 months ago
These are not orthodox interpretations but they are the emotions of a complete musician who is totally immersed in his independent vision. Kudos! He's not a clone. He thinks and recreates for himself, in the moment. A genius.
pproust 5 months ago
E QUESTO SAREBBE IL NIPOTE DEL GRANDE HEINRICH NEUHAUS ??????? SUO NONNO STA GRIDANDO DI DOLORE DALLA TOMBA !!!!!!!
darkblueangel1956 8 months ago
In Russia sono nati e sono cresciuti sempre tanti artisti, compositori e interpreti di altissima qualità. Anche tra i più giovani, molti sono pianisti eccezionali. Se ascolto Stanislav Bunin ho la stessa l'impressione che sentivo con Alexis Weissemberg ! Martellare così con Debussy, tanto egocentrismo e narcisismo, una tale cattiveria, senza un minimo di suono vellutato, un legato mediocre. Esecuzione sbrigativa e riduttiva !!! Neanche fosse nelle peggiori serate !!!!!
darkblueangel1956 8 months ago
キレがあるのに繊細で美しい。。。
amarto06 1 year ago
I get the impression from these performances that Bunin could produce a really wonderful L'Isle Joyeuse
AndyDougs 1 year ago 2
I too am very confused by the thumbs up at 1:31 , maybe it's a secret code? But i think it's an awesome performance!
juliburton 1 year ago
@juliburton
it's not the thumbs up, he just rise his left hand, and that's all....
ffiva 5 months ago in playlist Debussy
@ffiva You're right, it is just him lifting his hand now that I see it again.
juliburton 2 months ago
so beautiful....listening to this makes me what to practice hard....so touching
sofialiao 1 year ago
What was the thumbs up at 1:31 for?
christian502 1 year ago
@christian502 He does it a few times throughout the piece. I believe that is just that shape his hands make after pressuring his little finger, then pulling his hands of the keys. my hands do almost that same.
MrJacobbjb 11 months ago
Ok where the fuck is video url ?
RavenholmHunter 1 year ago
@RavenholmHunter click share
elitefireninja 1 year ago
sublime.
thanks
trevorpinnocky 2 years ago 2
beautiful
NeoVelocity 2 years ago 2
OMG the soud went I cant hear enything
MrJawad123456 2 years ago
I just saw All About Lily Chou-chou, which brought me to search for Debussy. Great music!
AKiSatoshi 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
bladdermembrane 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
a bit to fast in my opinion..isn't it adagio??
AlexanderFieres 2 years ago
shut it, you blaggard
NeoVelocity 2 years ago
Comment removed
AlexanderFieres 2 years ago
When weird playing, i always ask myself: Would Debussy himself like this? In fact he might have found his playing an interesting sound or way of playing his pieces. This pianist is good. He might need to look in different epoques of music
Spigel66 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
His playing of Arabesque is neurotic, self indulgent and completely out of style for Debussy.
Elena0210 2 years ago
who says so? you're not in the position to decide what is out of style for any composer
K4thyliz 2 years ago 6
šumne
DP250291 2 years ago
多少独善的に聴こえます。
sayaendo8735 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Anyone have a problem with me saying: LIBERACE eats this guy for breakfast?
herbiethebarber 3 years ago
yes
mrozomir2 3 years ago
Why so?
herbiethebarber 3 years ago
liberace bleongs to a different genre altogether. He is more of a show-man, and although he plays well, he doesn't show the same extreme presicion that you can see in this piece. Playing as subtly as he does in the arabesque requires a lot of skill and control to make it grow into a whole piece like this.
This doesn't mean that liberace ain't a good player. He would kick this guy's ass in show-music, but this guy would kick liberace's ass in classical.
Vazzivazzi 3 years ago
I agree they are different genres, yet I still argue that Liberace could play this EXACTLY as Stanislav does, key for key, emotion for emotion. Now; the big question, is the opposite true? Can Stanislav do what Liberace can do? Play a 1/16 boogie woogie for example, I think not. I think mechanically Liberace is the better player; and I further; the better overall entertainer. Isn't the point of music to entertain us? Surely if Liberace wins in his overall ability to entertain, he wins....
herbiethebarber 3 years ago
The point of some music is to entertain. Music overall is a form of artistic expression. To conflate it with trivial entertainment, wherein all value is calculated upon whether the music entertains the listener, is an insult to musicians and composers. Music is much deeper than that.
thinkpad20 2 years ago
Thats brillant... Is this something you just made up or is a saying?? Its great Beautiful
Thexspyder 1 year ago
I take back part of my last statement, the 1/16 part. Obviously Stan is capable of doing it. But, I would still challenge the notion of a "speed" competition between the 2. I've got my money on Liberace, playing without looking, making his hands fly 2 feet above the piano.. to exactly, precisely where they should be in time. Though I take nothing away from Stanislave; he is no doubt great; Ask around a little bit, who knows Liberace? Who knows Stanislav? And why?
herbiethebarber 3 years ago
I like what he done with it, never heard anything like it.
michieldpiano 3 years ago
so touching...
best and great style
tinheha 3 years ago 11
At least he put some emotion in it. Something most performers miss. This is a very passionate peice that is meant to sweep you away.
alroy67 3 years ago 6
Okay, he plays well, but a touch too much rubato in the Arabesque, and the Tarantella (also called "Danse") is much too fast in the outer sections. I also heard some wrong notes in the Danse.
myxklptk 3 years ago
very impressive
frankiiiiiiiii99 3 years ago
Very nice...cp
myfare65 3 years ago
fantastic!
bluebeardit 4 years ago
The arabesque is lovely, but the tarantelle styrienne should'nt be so fast and so staccato. And there are some false notes.
willx16 4 years ago
Weird - I thought the arabesque (at least initially) was exactly that: a bit too fast and staccato? Excellant dynamic control and lovely interpretation and feel overall though (arabesque)?
52FestiveRoad 4 years ago
wrong, it was the tarantelle styrienne that he thought was too fast and staccato
libetta 4 years ago
...erm...yes I know sunshine, I can read: I'm saying I thought this rendition of the arabesque was that to so erm, wrong...I suggest you put new batteries in, switch yourself on, go back, pay attention and re-read what I've actually stated above he he! ;-)) (You may just not understand English well enough or something, I don't know...not being funny or anything.) ;-))
52FestiveRoad 4 years ago
lol. because you put the symbol : instead of ; after the word THAT on the first sentence, which may explain your first statement.
libetta 4 years ago
Oh no here we go - the English language police strike on YouTube! ;-P Thanks for the rather pedantic lesson on how to puntuate within my OWN mother tongue! ;-))
I used the colon exactly as I intended it there, which was to imply a statement; if I'd have used a semicolon like I've just done here, it wouldn't have been appropriate and THEN wouldn't have made proper sense.
;-))
52FestiveRoad 4 years ago
"Weird - I thought the arabesque (at least initially) was exactly that: a bit too fast and staccato?"
lol, you think the arabesque was too fast and staccato?
libetta 4 years ago
Hey is there anything else you'd like to try and teach me? Maybe the rules of cricket? How to cook eggs, bacon and sausages? How to stand in queues patiently without complaining etc etc? Oh yeah! Hey there's also sarcasm as well. I don't know, I might need to brush up on that one to. What do you think Sir? Any pointers as you're seemingly on a roll?) ;-))
52FestiveRoad 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
maybe i could teach you how to fuck a lady, which i think you wouldn't learn in a million years
libetta 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
RALMFAO! ;-)) What? A little, midget 20 yr old needle-dick Philiphino kid HA HARRGGHH?! Orr what! Thanks! That's brightened my day up that no end boy ha harrgghh lol! ;-)) I REALLY don't fucking think so somehow lad! In your wildest, wet little dreams boy, in your dreams LMFAOOL! You wouldn't know one end of a woman's body to the other you little prick, now fuck off LMFAO! ;-))
52FestiveRoad 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Lol. just because of a simple comment on proper punctuation marks you'd attack me with all these uncivilized comments. insecurity i'd say.
libetta 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
God - you're like a turd that won't flush you aren't you Burlington Bertie?! :-O No, YOU attacked ME with INAPPROPRIATE USE of punctuation marks shit-for-brains (a little bit pedantic to say the least!), THEN made immature (and uncivilized) assertions about the sexual prowess of your dreams - now THAT, is what I'd call INSECURE bollocks brains! Let that be the end of it - I'm bored with you now and have had my moment of fun with you he he! ;-))
52FestiveRoad 3 years ago
now you just gave me a negative impression how of bad english attitude can be! admit it, you used a wrong punctuation mark. who cares if English is your mother tongue. Punctuation marks are used not only in that language dumbhead!
libetta 3 years ago 2
Wow. He plays with feeling.
Fordz 4 years ago
True understanding of Debussy's impressionism.
thethikboy 4 years ago 2
believe it or not, this is the first performance that brought me to tears! and i like the tarantelle as well
libetta 4 years ago