@fergy1982 100% correct SC:FA is better in every respect hands down. The graphics, the real game graphics, in Supreme Commander 1 are hands down better. SC2 looks like a game from the early 2000's or 90's, definatly not a modern game. Its horrible.
@kilkun I see what you did there and usually you would be right. But TA and SC:FA were some thing different from all those other RTS's. SC2 lost that edge and now it is just an RTS among thousands that just looks similar to SC:FA but doesn't play as it.
@fergy1982 I personally enjoyed SC2 just because of the new units, mod tools, and overall plot. Well that and sometimes I don't have 3-5 hours to blow playing an RTS so it's nice to have a nice quick match on SC2. One thing though. FA cannot compare to SC. Plain and simple.
people who are playing Starcraft 2 are looking at this and being impressed--it's probably because starcraft 2 is using a stale old formula for RTS games developed over 10 years ago. zzzzzz. games like dawn of war, supreme commander, men of war, company of heroes are moving forward.
If you ask me, Supreme Commander FA was a much better game than Supreme Commander 2. Supreme Commander 2 was not bad but the gameplay was just completely different than the others....
THIS GAME SUCKS ON THE XBOX CUZ THE UNIT CAP IS 200 BUT YOU CANT CHANGE IT AT ALL!!!!! YOUR ARMIES LITERALLY CANT GET BIG ENOUGH CUZ YOU CANT HAVE MORE THAN 200 UNITS...... INCLUDING STUCTURES!!!!!!
@Mapcrasy It doesn't suck, people who play it and suck at it blame the game for sucking lol I have Starcraft 2 and I'm really thinkin about buying this game, the battles seems way more epic and massive than any other strategy game.
if you want to know how to get the game and play it online look at my video i made that shows you step by step. I mean the one released in 1997 and believe it or not people still play it online but only 100 or so. which surprises me because its got to be one of the best rts games on pc in that gen . thumbs up so people can see this
this is a really GREAT GAme ! but you MUST improve in physics realism... like units stepping over destroyed garbage crushing destroyed units... or broken pieces of destroyed stuff overstepping the walls or the floor (that looks noob) ... that is really important to improve... hope you take my advice seriously ;)
Press the Pause/Break button on your keyboard. If you don't have it, it is probably a key where you hold the FN key and press something. Check your keyboard.
Ok yeah, this game had a pretty terrible single player campaign, especially in comparison to Supreme commander 1. But it is far more accessible, it looks goods and is able to provide a strong amount of strategy so it can still entertain hardcore RTS gamers even while it was simplified over the original. It is also better for casual multiplayer games due to the way they toned it down in size. Not to mention the fact that they have given the game alot of attention as far as patcges are concerned..
@STALKERX9 yea and thats what made the game so damn good. Supcom 2 doesnt even deserve the title supreme commander 2 bc the game play changed for the worse and the story line got screwed up.
They should allow us to see "eye view" from a unit selected, that woud be very very cool.... like Haegemonia - allows you to "Feel" like your inside the unit when a battle taking place,
@Nevawake U SAID most boring game of 2010. i fell asleep playing it. I want my $3.74 back from Steam..
Its like just a bunch of shit firing at each other without personality. Fuck. i mean.
Build this times 20 then fight. Fucken boring. C&C3 kanes wrath i went back to and had fun!! Wow look at all these dots shooting at each other. welcome to Supre comm 2. Reason i took back Supre com 1 was it was boring also. i assume this be better. i lost 3 bucks man! so you just send a angry coment?
@Asken96 dude I know...ha?what me worry? is my response. my post isnt a cure for Hodgkins disease ok?
I posted that coz man WHERE THE FUCK r THE OTHER UPGRADES?????in the game itself?
u get 2 choises of mech on land base and 2 choises of air or was it 1? for air base.etc Can u fill me in that there is more to this?Where r the extra upgrades? i mean.....maybe im wrong?
btw guys lucas arts did not make empire at war they only published it and they do have a "sequal" its an expansion adding and new faction and story its called forces of corruption
imagine halo combined with supreme commander and its a first person shooter not a tactical game now that would be awesome! I can already imagine it O_O.
@megabrout just picturing hundreds of storm troopers and walkers on that huge field is making me shake! i wish it'd be centered on the clone wars. epic droid vs clone battles are awesome!
@megabrout They should make a few Empire at War games: Jedi at War? (Sith-Jedi War era), Republic at War (Clone Wars era), Empire at War Sequel, New Republic at War? (Aftermath of the Galactic Civil War), and maybe, just maybe, a Galaxy at War (Yuuzhan Vong Invasion) That'd be a big project, though. Anyhow, please, ignore my babbling and enjoy the video. XD:D
@lordmetal2 the graphics and unit movement are the only things that were really good about SC2. with the Supreme Commander: Infinite War DLC, it is definitely a very good game
@TheCrispism Well SC2 is drasticly inferior in terms of complexity. There is like a third of the units that SC has. The economics now act like pretty much every RTS out there, meaning that you have to have the initial resources necessary to build a building before you do so. And that sucks. Bad...Real bad. The Experimentals are ridiculous, there is no more Tech factor, no adjaceny bonus, radar sistem is weak, AI's are really dumb, maps suck balls and are small. You can still try it its not bad.
@lordmetal2 yeah, i guess you're right. i mean, starcraft 2 is more fun to me, but starcraft 1 was easier to work with. but i think starcraft 2 is still basically the same it's predecessor, just with better graphics, new units, and modified old ones.
I mean there we had supcom 1 & FA whit ybet good gameplay & strictly for the HC audience=no casuals allowed >).
It had it probelems sure but that was back then. We expected supcom 2 pretty much just FA whit better graphics. new story. Some new units & maybe new skins & maps ofc.
& people are bitter since for RTS games it was a horrific year for HC. Since c&c 4 & supcom 2 were way more casual pointed.
@lordmetal2 It sold out TA and Supcom into something primitive enough to sell out on the console market, maps are smaller, graphics are shittier, experimentals are over-sold, and the economy management insults your intelligence. Hell, it's from a company that is only known for RPGs and have no history with RTS. This is a sellout sack of shit from all angles.
Actually it depends, SupCom 2 is meant for less serious(and like you suggested, less intelligent) RTS players, or possibly even new RTS players, while SupCom1 and FA are meant for more advanced players, with a larger variety of units, and many more legit strategies.
In my opinion, Supcom 1 and FA are the best, SupCom 2 follows behind... although i was kinda disapointed when i finished the campaign of SupCom 2 in 2 days...
SC2 isn't as good as SC1.. THAT is the problem and worth complaining about. the biggest drawbacks are the unit limitation and the economy. I mean, in SC/FA I used to have 80 to 100 engineers. that's 1/3rd of the max units in this game. I miss the rediculous massive battles. New tech tree method is ok though. oh yea, the commanders look weird.
Nah, Square Enix did a better job on SC2, since the campaigns are more interesting and the action is more intense( turrets and crap flying out of destroyed units)
@lordmetal2 Let's see here. Aeon unit names, nearly half of the gameplay content from the first such as walls, coordinated strikes, and flow based economy had been ripped out, the story makes no sense, the characters are utterly unlikeable, the ACU's are ugly, Experimentals have gone from a "bring me my brown pants" moment to being a joke, the maps are a fraction the size of the original, the game is buggy as hell, Aeon has no navy (massive cop-out), AND DID I MENTION THEIR STUPID UNIT NAMES?!!?
@SortilegeMETAL80 No wonder, Xbox 360. however, putting the game on a console does not ruin it. Some features will be on PC, such as graphical detail BUT shouldn't dumb it down at all over on the PC side.
Would have been nice to see this on PS3. Add mouse and keyboard support and your ballin. No need to stress out over "I HOPE MY COMPUTER CAN RUN IT!!!" just make sure it ain't some shitty port. *Cough* Dragon Age...
@Downsider24 i played SUPCOM 1 FA and the old Total Anhilation and I can say that this game is a insult over gamers, Its just a shit. The problem its not that my Computer cannot run it ... lol I run Crysis Warhead at Ultra setting with no trouble .... But the point is that the consoles dumbed down the game . you cannot command 300 unit on a 40km2 map with a xbox pad ..< you have to simplify .. so yeah the game dont worth a buy 2/10
@samljer I dont give a shit about goty crap, im talking about MONEIZ, and starcraft will make more than any other rts (except perhaps the first sc). i agree that game for each faction is idiotic, but hey, thats activision and i liked blizz better before them
@YellowOaker Gas powered games has always owned blizzard products, its the truth.. Most people wont agree with me when i say this. Ive always prefered products from GPG over Blizzard
@YellowOaker why?? i ve played SUP COMM 1 campaign only and there where like 7 missions only but in those 7 missions i spent like 15 hours, they where pretty good, i have played starcraft 1 and its great i know a lot of starcraft 2 but i havent played it yet so whatis betterr in this game than sc2, i know also that both games have a different pace, sc2 is really really fast and this is pretty slow i think
Supreme Commander 2 disappointed me because they changed most good things in it. Starcraft 2 disappointed me because they changed fucking NOTHING in multiplayer. Sure, 2-3 new units, but that's ALL. No new innovative gameplay or sth.
Only good thing about Starcraft 2 is the campaign, it's great. Only good thing about Supreme Commander 2 is the PERFECT performance.
Well, at least Stronghold 3 won't disappoint me, all the things they announced are to my likening. 2011 will save rts^^.
OK can someone help me out? I find it a pretty usable game as far as it comes to intuitive gameplay, but I do not seem to get understand how I can use the Nuke defence silo. Enemies can just nuke me and that make me loose my battles. So I would be glad if someone could give me a bit of a dailed description to what buttons I should push or what I should do to make my nuke defence silo stop those "strategic launch detection". I thought the silo would just nuke it out in his region, but it doesnt
Thanx for the answer dude. The thing is that I build anti nukes..to the point where I had about 10 anti nukes spread around every location ...they have some 'visible reach'when you put them down. Yet when the enemry actually vires a nuke at me, nothing happends. They do not shoot that nuke out as I've seen the enemy do that to other enemeies.I'm not sure how to get those anti nukes working. They're called "anti nuke silo"If i remember correctly...do you know what I dont do right?
Don't bother buying SC2. Its horrible.
dewpoint88 2 weeks ago
@dewpoint88 agree just play Forged Alliance it is much better.
fergy1982 2 weeks ago
@fergy1982 100% correct SC:FA is better in every respect hands down. The graphics, the real game graphics, in Supreme Commander 1 are hands down better. SC2 looks like a game from the early 2000's or 90's, definatly not a modern game. Its horrible.
dewpoint88 2 weeks ago
@fergy1982 Forged Alliance was total shit. The original and Total Annihilation beat the crap out of it.
kilkun 3 days ago
@kilkun I see what you did there and usually you would be right. But TA and SC:FA were some thing different from all those other RTS's. SC2 lost that edge and now it is just an RTS among thousands that just looks similar to SC:FA but doesn't play as it.
fergy1982 3 days ago
@fergy1982 I personally enjoyed SC2 just because of the new units, mod tools, and overall plot. Well that and sometimes I don't have 3-5 hours to blow playing an RTS so it's nice to have a nice quick match on SC2. One thing though. FA cannot compare to SC. Plain and simple.
kilkun 3 days ago
people who are playing Starcraft 2 are looking at this and being impressed--it's probably because starcraft 2 is using a stale old formula for RTS games developed over 10 years ago. zzzzzz. games like dawn of war, supreme commander, men of war, company of heroes are moving forward.
mburke000 3 weeks ago
i personally liked FA better because it had more sense of progression with the tiers... i miss those...
ScFirestorM 3 weeks ago
I really enjoy the comments from this guy, like a boss.
chimiaxd 1 month ago
Even though this is in the same genre as starcraft 2, but even though I have starcraft 2 I want to play this game, it looks so massive
zxc56km6 1 month ago
@zxc56km6 I've got the same feeling lol
chimiaxd 1 month ago
@jpmac098 thx mate
thegorrilaz1 1 month ago
If you ask me, Supreme Commander FA was a much better game than Supreme Commander 2. Supreme Commander 2 was not bad but the gameplay was just completely different than the others....
TheShoryuken101 1 month ago
does any1 no where i can get the first supremm commander
thegorrilaz1 1 month ago
@thegorrilaz1 Steam.
jpmac098 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i just wanna state the honest truth:
THIS GAME SUCKS ON THE XBOX CUZ THE UNIT CAP IS 200 BUT YOU CANT CHANGE IT AT ALL!!!!! YOUR ARMIES LITERALLY CANT GET BIG ENOUGH CUZ YOU CANT HAVE MORE THAN 200 UNITS...... INCLUDING STUCTURES!!!!!!
MrKnexdude101 2 months ago
The HUD on pre-alpha was better than the present one.
jrwinekone 3 months ago
Can someone pliz tell me wy supreme commander 2 sucks so much? becouse i really think its a good game :D
Mapcrasy 4 months ago
@Mapcrasy It doesn't suck per se, it just is a step back from the last release "forged alliance. The biggest grips are:
> Smaller maps lower unit count and general massive loss of scope
> Worse gfx and physics (yes they are worse despite testaments to the contrary)
> Silly story silly Characters
I own both and have not bothered to play past the 3rd mission. The game is not worth the time as I own Forged alliance.
CmdrTobs 2 months ago
@CmdrTobs You are wrong, SupCommand2 is way better in many ways bro lol. Gameplay, graphics, units, story, everything.
chimiaxd 1 month ago
@Mapcrasy It doesn't suck, people who play it and suck at it blame the game for sucking lol I have Starcraft 2 and I'm really thinkin about buying this game, the battles seems way more epic and massive than any other strategy game.
chimiaxd 1 month ago
Wos this game is amazing
MrParombo 4 months ago
This looks cool. But i would like to see a Star Wars game on that engine
MrParombo 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
if you want to know how to get the game and play it online look at my video i made that shows you step by step. I mean the one released in 1997 and believe it or not people still play it online but only 100 or so. which surprises me because its got to be one of the best rts games on pc in that gen . thumbs up so people can see this
thebrain678 5 months ago
is forged alliance even out yet
MoRgaSmIcneSS 5 months ago
cool i got way better grapics than you XD (in the vid)
unlovedFIGHTER 6 months ago
this is not a multyplayer map its a campaigin map ... !?!?!?!
unlovedFIGHTER 6 months ago
do u need 4G ram or somthing for the game???
jerkxbox 6 months ago
@jerkxbox
I play with 2G
Oxygh3nz 6 months ago
they should make a fourth supreme commander, like, Supreme Commander: An Empire's End
artedin1 6 months ago
I love everything about this game except the units. There just not that cool. A tyranasaurous robot, like come on, thats lame.
mostillrx 6 months ago
this is a really GREAT GAme ! but you MUST improve in physics realism... like units stepping over destroyed garbage crushing destroyed units... or broken pieces of destroyed stuff overstepping the walls or the floor (that looks noob) ... that is really important to improve... hope you take my advice seriously ;)
Industriajor 6 months ago 2
Please anyone help me how did u pause the game at 6:49 ?
Allan9798 6 months ago
@Allan9798
Press the Pause/Break button on your keyboard. If you don't have it, it is probably a key where you hold the FN key and press something. Check your keyboard.
chaklong 6 months ago
Ok yeah, this game had a pretty terrible single player campaign, especially in comparison to Supreme commander 1. But it is far more accessible, it looks goods and is able to provide a strong amount of strategy so it can still entertain hardcore RTS gamers even while it was simplified over the original. It is also better for casual multiplayer games due to the way they toned it down in size. Not to mention the fact that they have given the game alot of attention as far as patcges are concerned..
DARKENDUCK 6 months ago
Was it just me or some missions in the first game take hours to complete?
Like the final mission of the aeon, i probably took more time than passing an entyre campaign of some other game.
STALKERX9 7 months ago
@STALKERX9 yea and thats what made the game so damn good. Supcom 2 doesnt even deserve the title supreme commander 2 bc the game play changed for the worse and the story line got screwed up.
publicenemy421 7 months ago
this is what fucking happens when u dont let RELIC make ur rts game and give it to some shitty company like square enix
jakoson7 7 months ago
@jakoson7
Square Enix is just the publisher, GPG is the developer, read before posting crap.
vossejongk 7 months ago
research hierarchy makes a rts game epic..i luvd the video..i will definitely go for this..
guies do look for sins of solar empire its also really awesome n its for core rts fans
ceasefire066 7 months ago
Looked 5 seconds....
Im in love!
Alienbuddie 8 months ago 2
That's one of the things that makes me like Supreme Commander so much:
The animations. Lord those are good.
StewieHW 8 months ago
ITs boring cuz there are not enough units i hate that games ... AoE 2 is better than this.
Wulfik666 8 months ago
I just bought the game and i think it's awesome (if you have the proper specs!) If anyone wants to play versus AI add me cause i suck at pvp..:>
Kruizlinx 8 months ago
Snitches don't know 'bout TA!
Who's with me...
DrasticPurpleHippo 8 months ago
ALSO COORDINATED ATTACKS
oh wait.
oEQjet 8 months ago
We need SupComFA with these smooth animations and pathfinding.
I bet my PC would melt from that though.
Danjiano 8 months ago
those energy generators are massive
sikh9741 9 months ago
ta anyone?
MrColeknows 9 months ago
They should allow us to see "eye view" from a unit selected, that woud be very very cool.... like Haegemonia - allows you to "Feel" like your inside the unit when a battle taking place,
succezz4u 10 months ago
suppream commander FA is still better
lordrevan571 11 months ago
WTF at 2:05 you can see the UEF transports, and they're landed! this is the pre-alpha, and in the finished game, air units never land :/
Superdude2112 11 months ago
i wanna see a sup com 3 with aweome grphics massive maps and monkeylords! on xbox ffs not evryone can fork out a grand for a gaming pc!
IproLegend 11 months ago
I think PG should release map tools so whe can make bigger maps. These are too small, compare it with SC1. I like the game in other aspects.
shipsim09 11 months ago
i got sc 1 sc 2 now sc forged alliance is comming trough the the mail soon in a few days forged is better then all of them
bubbajay716 1 year ago
Comment removed
Nevawake 1 year ago
@Nevawake so... i just send a commnet and hope to get your money back from a dudes as do a rewview... wow... WHAT A FAILUR
Asken96 1 year ago
@Asken96 ha? What me worry?
Nevawake 1 year ago
@Nevawake U SAID most boring game of 2010. i fell asleep playing it. I want my $3.74 back from Steam..
Its like just a bunch of shit firing at each other without personality. Fuck. i mean.
Build this times 20 then fight. Fucken boring. C&C3 kanes wrath i went back to and had fun!! Wow look at all these dots shooting at each other. welcome to Supre comm 2. Reason i took back Supre com 1 was it was boring also. i assume this be better. i lost 3 bucks man! so you just send a angry coment?
Asken96 1 year ago
@Asken96 dude I know...ha?what me worry? is my response. my post isnt a cure for Hodgkins disease ok?
I posted that coz man WHERE THE FUCK r THE OTHER UPGRADES?????in the game itself?
u get 2 choises of mech on land base and 2 choises of air or was it 1? for air base.etc Can u fill me in that there is more to this?Where r the extra upgrades? i mean.....maybe im wrong?
Nevawake 1 year ago
@Nevawake well... good Q . but u had to upgrade your army for got some other units like king kriptor or a titan and air fotress
Asken96 1 year ago
@Asken96 ok cheers for the info....Il try some more. i really wanted more upgrades. maybe supreme comander 1 might be a better game to re give a go..
Il give this game a few more hours....
Nevawake 1 year ago
@Asken96 i should read the manual first...all good thanks for help. I found how to upgrade by trial error.
Nevawake 1 year ago
@Nevawake np m8 sub me :)
Asken96 1 year ago
at the end i bet the UEF was like "what the fuck"
mrkinght208 1 year ago
btw guys lucas arts did not make empire at war they only published it and they do have a "sequal" its an expansion adding and new faction and story its called forces of corruption
Mrnentendoman 1 year ago
How do you get units built in the Atlantis II to come out of the ship. :) thanks!
BEAST6257 1 year ago
red dots against blue dots...
dgviktor 1 year ago
Hmm i may get this, this looks really fun.
xboxx360halo3 1 year ago
imagine halo combined with supreme commander and its a first person shooter not a tactical game now that would be awesome! I can already imagine it O_O.
Who here agrees?
crappyelmo 1 year ago
@crappyelmo Thats already been done, look up Halo Wars....
TheShoryuken101 1 month ago
do you guys think that the weapons in SC 2 are weaker than in SC1==
brianluk2006 1 year ago
lmao... look at the over sized behemoth energy generators.. lol?
MrWaffles224 1 year ago
Lucasarts should really make an empire at war sequel based on new graphic technology ans on supreme commander, that would be awesome!
wo agrees?
megabrout 1 year ago 70
@megabrout DO IT LUCAS ARTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
BEAST6257 1 year ago
@BEAST6257
and i also don't get why they have only brought out star wars battlefront sequels on the psp or ds, it should be the computer or ps3, assholes
megabrout 1 year ago
@megabrout It is pretty dumb that they haven't. Battlefront is still fun.
BEAST6257 1 year ago
@megabrout Sure but you do understand that unit AI in EAW was horrible & well its kinda just a sandbox whit mission scenarios.
Not a fully made RTS game whit story & shit.
justmymage 1 year ago
@justmymage
especially ground combat, but i do include the whole modding community, the mods for eaw are epic.
but i hate the zhan consurtium. no matter if it's a mod or not.
what i really ment was a game like eaw but much improved of course
megabrout 1 year ago
@megabrout *Petrogyph. Lucasarts didn't make EAW :P
Helge129 11 months ago
@Helge129
knew that, but people ussualy associate star wars games with lucasarts.
and without lucasarts, there will be no eaw 3 ar somethin (:
megabrout 11 months ago
@megabrout It'd be awesome.
OnlyLifeMatters 9 months ago
@OnlyLifeMatters
indeed, but i don't think they will make much games after TOR
megabrout 9 months ago
@megabrout Yeah. It's a shame, really. I enjoyed Forces of Corruption.
OnlyLifeMatters 9 months ago
@megabrout just picturing hundreds of storm troopers and walkers on that huge field is making me shake! i wish it'd be centered on the clone wars. epic droid vs clone battles are awesome!
9f81rsd00 9 months ago
@megabrout They should make a few Empire at War games: Jedi at War? (Sith-Jedi War era), Republic at War (Clone Wars era), Empire at War Sequel, New Republic at War? (Aftermath of the Galactic Civil War), and maybe, just maybe, a Galaxy at War (Yuuzhan Vong Invasion) That'd be a big project, though. Anyhow, please, ignore my babbling and enjoy the video. XD:D
RTSDELTA 7 months ago
Why is every one talking about trucks in starcraft 2 !?
warior531 1 year ago
u got to whatch this epic batte in hd its so good so well done best base i have ever seen and its got all dlc units pro
supreme commader 2 epic game virusnetcore part 1 of 8 new dlc in hd
podp29 1 year ago
To me THE BEST strategy games are
1.StarCraft
2.WarCraft
3.Dawn of War
4.Universe at War
5.Supreme Commander
6.Command & Conquer
dark101hunter 1 year ago
@dark101hunter 100% agree except for starcraft which ive sadly never played
dwanyverk 1 year ago
@dark101hunter You forgot total annihilation, the ORIGINAL RTS BY CHRIS TAYLOR!!!! It was made in 1997 and had what has become the norm for RTS games
Mcflyjuniors 1 year ago
@Mcflyjuniors sorry no I haven't forgot.....I don't like Total Annihilation....sry...no offence :)
dark101hunter 11 months ago
its a nice game for people without the time to have a game with more than 5h
Lolserti 1 year ago
for $20 u cant go wrong, grab this sucka! ;)
yme1982 1 year ago
I got this game it is really great
Great graphic and game play
I loved it
kanasr112211 1 year ago
Epic Game!
drummergeorge182 1 year ago
ty gas powered games for makeing this game so easy to run
proziew 1 year ago
lol 2 vs 1 & no where to retreat
worldcore123 1 year ago
this game graphic is way better than the first one but the unit doesnt looked as kool as the first one..
88specv 1 year ago
is it on ps3?
TheGoldenXfire 1 year ago
@TheGoldenXfire
-_-
james227uk 1 year ago
Looks cool I might want to buy this hope it's fun
megastagbeetle 1 year ago
Why does this pre-alpha version make the actual release look crappy by comparison?
TheWyrmofIron 1 year ago
It looks like fucking Lego.
St1ckm3npwn 1 year ago 2
@St1ckm3npwn thats because its meant to look futuristic and robotic..
moomind1 1 year ago
@moomind1 Futuristic Lego? Starwars Copyright lol
St1ckm3npwn 1 year ago
@St1ckm3npwn
PRE-ALPHA
Watch any other supcom 2 vid and you'll see what I mean.
xXdaveXsuperstarXx 1 year ago
@St1ckm3npwn no comments to you man... -.-
rukka16 1 year ago
This is pre-alpha? How much more is there to add?
darthguy3 1 year ago
i do like the expoloding debris that flies up off of blown up units and buildings.
jrag1000 1 year ago
I dont know what the fuck people complain about SC2. Its an awesome game. Yeah, sure, its not really as good as SC1, but fuck it its a good game.
lordmetal2 1 year ago 71
@lordmetal2 yeh its a good game because hardly anything changes from the original might as well be starcraft 1.5
sei70 1 year ago
@lordmetal2 i agree supreme commander 1and 2 are awesome games
MrGamalier 1 year ago
@lordmetal2 the graphics and unit movement are the only things that were really good about SC2. with the Supreme Commander: Infinite War DLC, it is definitely a very good game
SmoshRules55 1 year ago
@lordmetal2 can u tell me why is the second one worse? and how?
TheCrispism 1 year ago
@TheCrispism Well SC2 is drasticly inferior in terms of complexity. There is like a third of the units that SC has. The economics now act like pretty much every RTS out there, meaning that you have to have the initial resources necessary to build a building before you do so. And that sucks. Bad...Real bad. The Experimentals are ridiculous, there is no more Tech factor, no adjaceny bonus, radar sistem is weak, AI's are really dumb, maps suck balls and are small. You can still try it its not bad.
lordmetal2 1 year ago
@lordmetal2 its a good game but not worthy of the supcom title
Mrnentendoman 1 year ago
@lordmetal2 some people might think you're talking about starcraft
personman2gig 1 year ago
@personman2gig It applies.
lordmetal2 1 year ago
@lordmetal2 yeah, i guess you're right. i mean, starcraft 2 is more fun to me, but starcraft 1 was easier to work with. but i think starcraft 2 is still basically the same it's predecessor, just with better graphics, new units, and modified old ones.
personman2gig 1 year ago
@lordmetal2 Would not say good but passable.
I mean there we had supcom 1 & FA whit ybet good gameplay & strictly for the HC audience=no casuals allowed >).
It had it probelems sure but that was back then. We expected supcom 2 pretty much just FA whit better graphics. new story. Some new units & maybe new skins & maps ofc.
& people are bitter since for RTS games it was a horrific year for HC. Since c&c 4 & supcom 2 were way more casual pointed.
Its like getting a egg but expecting a turkey.
justmymage 1 year ago
@lordmetal2 Agreed!
neilladriaansen 1 year ago
@lordmetal2 It sold out TA and Supcom into something primitive enough to sell out on the console market, maps are smaller, graphics are shittier, experimentals are over-sold, and the economy management insults your intelligence. Hell, it's from a company that is only known for RPGs and have no history with RTS. This is a sellout sack of shit from all angles.
ImperialArmour 1 year ago 2
@ImperialArmour
Actually it depends, SupCom 2 is meant for less serious(and like you suggested, less intelligent) RTS players, or possibly even new RTS players, while SupCom1 and FA are meant for more advanced players, with a larger variety of units, and many more legit strategies.
In my opinion, Supcom 1 and FA are the best, SupCom 2 follows behind... although i was kinda disapointed when i finished the campaign of SupCom 2 in 2 days...
MushrooMars 11 months ago
@lordmetal2
eeh.. mate, you just said it:
SC2 isn't as good as SC1.. THAT is the problem and worth complaining about. the biggest drawbacks are the unit limitation and the economy. I mean, in SC/FA I used to have 80 to 100 engineers. that's 1/3rd of the max units in this game. I miss the rediculous massive battles. New tech tree method is ok though. oh yea, the commanders look weird.
EliteGhost001 11 months ago 2
@lordmetal2
Nah, Square Enix did a better job on SC2, since the campaigns are more interesting and the action is more intense( turrets and crap flying out of destroyed units)
floodlock123 10 months ago
@lordmetal2 Let's see here. Aeon unit names, nearly half of the gameplay content from the first such as walls, coordinated strikes, and flow based economy had been ripped out, the story makes no sense, the characters are utterly unlikeable, the ACU's are ugly, Experimentals have gone from a "bring me my brown pants" moment to being a joke, the maps are a fraction the size of the original, the game is buggy as hell, Aeon has no navy (massive cop-out), AND DID I MENTION THEIR STUPID UNIT NAMES?!!?
Zataku 9 months ago
@Zataku
Well, it's still a good game. Compared to some other games.
Just nowhere near the awesomeness of SupCom1
Danjiano 8 months ago
Comment removed
SjanAcd 1 year ago
Comment removed
SjanAcd 1 year ago
Comment removed
SjanAcd 1 year ago
the game now looks far more like a snazzy command and conquer
Galacticmaster 1 year ago
wow thats a high lvl of graphics i'm surprised that it was pre alpha
michaell8000 1 year ago
Comment removed
SjanAcd 1 year ago
Comment removed
SjanAcd 1 year ago
am i the only one that noticed that this isnt a lvl in the game? im mad it isnt this would be a fun mission
krb99ss 1 year ago
I have this game
MrDUCKICARINA 1 year ago
i just noticed SC2 can mean Supreme Commander 2 and Starcraft 2.... ><"
alexilaiho1st 1 year ago
tanks look like toys
kingjohnkk 1 year ago
Supcom1 > Shit > Supcom 2
Thay juste too much simplified this game ...
they maked it for the console
result = the shitest game ever .
from a SUPCOM1 and FA Fan
SortilegeMETAL80 1 year ago
@SortilegeMETAL80 No wonder, Xbox 360. however, putting the game on a console does not ruin it. Some features will be on PC, such as graphical detail BUT shouldn't dumb it down at all over on the PC side.
Would have been nice to see this on PS3. Add mouse and keyboard support and your ballin. No need to stress out over "I HOPE MY COMPUTER CAN RUN IT!!!" just make sure it ain't some shitty port. *Cough* Dragon Age...
Downsider24 1 year ago
SortilegeMETAL80 1 year ago
@SortilegeMETAL80 even though the game it is on xbox the game is really meant for pc
PlayerZYX 1 year ago
Supreme commander 2 > Starcraft 2
Fiji1234 1 year ago
im going to buy it
unQuake 1 year ago
rockheads r beast
wowisuckatmath 1 year ago
great gameplay
good job game developers.
happysplinters 1 year ago
damn this game is great. i know all u sc2 whores and korean cyborgs will say that it sux . imo this one is > sc2
yes i played this one and also i played sc2 beta and full version
so i can say this based on my experience
Wargargble 1 year ago
Starcraft 2 is the real strategy game while this game suck. Nothing impress me in this game.
Solitude075 1 year ago
@Solitude075 coming from someone who cant even word a correct sentence. nice.
poiper80 1 year ago
@poiper80 Like I give a shit about it.
Solitude075 1 year ago
whats funny is SC1 was GOTY for 10 years
and during that 10 years other games in the same genre were also
labeled as GOTY. think about that for awhile blizzard fanboys.
theres a difference now, activision has thier filthy hands on SC2
and its already been botched. need to buy a different game for
each faction is just a start to all the bullshit.
samljer 1 year ago
@samljer I dont give a shit about goty crap, im talking about MONEIZ, and starcraft will make more than any other rts (except perhaps the first sc). i agree that game for each faction is idiotic, but hey, thats activision and i liked blizz better before them
WikiNixa 1 year ago
@WikiNixa its fact, and i didnt ask you either.
samljer 1 year ago
U.E.F is fucked.
powerofdestiny 1 year ago
just played the demo on steam.. Bought it an hour later... awesome
ZombiesAreCHEESE 1 year ago
This fuxking pwns! I really enjoyted the game.
juustonaksut 1 year ago
Starcraft has been game of the year for 10 years. Starcraft 2 is going to STEAMROLL this game in sales. I dont even like this game. =/
ACOGInterventioN 1 year ago
this game owns starcraft 2 so badly
YellowOaker 1 year ago
@YellowOaker Think whatever you want YellowOaker, but Starcarft 2 will be the best selling RTS ever, as was SC1.
WikiNixa 1 year ago
@WikiNixa whats funny is SC1 was GOTY for 10 years
and during that 10 years other games in the same genre were also
labeled as GOTY. think about that for awhile.
samljer 1 year ago
@YellowOaker Gas powered games has always owned blizzard products, its the truth.. Most people wont agree with me when i say this. Ive always prefered products from GPG over Blizzard
Mikester750 1 year ago
@YellowOaker why?? i ve played SUP COMM 1 campaign only and there where like 7 missions only but in those 7 missions i spent like 15 hours, they where pretty good, i have played starcraft 1 and its great i know a lot of starcraft 2 but i havent played it yet so whatis betterr in this game than sc2, i know also that both games have a different pace, sc2 is really really fast and this is pretty slow i think
degaboss 1 year ago
Im buying starcraft 2 >.>
octarock 1 year ago 2
@octarock starcraft 2 is shit. supremecommander 2.
BillyLow94 1 year ago
@BillyLow94 eh it snot too bad,i don't like supreme commander because it looks like a bunch of fighting boxes
octarock 1 year ago
@BillyLow94 starcraft 2 is an ok game with great singleplayer
multiplayer is similar to first
but supcom 2 is BS
supcom 1 fa is kickeryass at its best
MrTBSC 1 year ago
@octarock
Supreme Commander 2 disappointed me because they changed most good things in it. Starcraft 2 disappointed me because they changed fucking NOTHING in multiplayer. Sure, 2-3 new units, but that's ALL. No new innovative gameplay or sth.
Only good thing about Starcraft 2 is the campaign, it's great. Only good thing about Supreme Commander 2 is the PERFECT performance.
Well, at least Stronghold 3 won't disappoint me, all the things they announced are to my likening. 2011 will save rts^^.
Earthplayer 1 year ago
@Earthplayer strong hold is the rts set in a medieval era right? i think i played the first one a long time ago i dont remember if thats the one
octarock 1 year ago
@octarock
Yes, and Stronghold 3 will be great, comes out fall 2011
Earthplayer 1 year ago
starcraft sux :S
wrelot 1 year ago
@wrelot
try red alert 3 its the best one out so far.
imnotbad9 1 year ago
@octarock
Yea after seeing that, this looks like a ps1 game. LOL
imnotbad9 1 year ago
@octarock ... holy shit it sucks...im bought it...and....after all years FAIL...
axel007seve 1 year ago
the graphics is good the ai is smart but the bad part is there is not that many units and the story is bad
roflcopterman100 1 year ago
i wonder how will be sc3 graphics
haseng86 1 year ago
OK can someone help me out? I find it a pretty usable game as far as it comes to intuitive gameplay, but I do not seem to get understand how I can use the Nuke defence silo. Enemies can just nuke me and that make me loose my battles. So I would be glad if someone could give me a bit of a dailed description to what buttons I should push or what I should do to make my nuke defence silo stop those "strategic launch detection". I thought the silo would just nuke it out in his region, but it doesnt
PowerRedBull 1 year ago
you have to build anti nukes
sikh9741 1 year ago
@sikh9741
Thanx for the answer dude. The thing is that I build anti nukes..to the point where I had about 10 anti nukes spread around every location ...they have some 'visible reach'when you put them down. Yet when the enemry actually vires a nuke at me, nothing happends. They do not shoot that nuke out as I've seen the enemy do that to other enemeies.I'm not sure how to get those anti nukes working. They're called "anti nuke silo"If i remember correctly...do you know what I dont do right?
PowerRedBull 1 year ago